--- Day changed Thu Jan 07 2016
00:08 -!- d_t [~textual@c-98-234-64-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
00:09 < btcdrak> I love how wumpus says good morning. *merge*
00:12 < GitHub110> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/41f1a3e99bfa...de9e5ea75e46
00:12 < GitHub110> bitcoin/master 5e10922 Luke Dashjr: Combine common error strings for different options so translations can be shared and reused
00:12 < GitHub110> bitcoin/master de9e5ea Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7257...
00:12 < GitHub163> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7257: Combine common error strings for different options so translations can be shared and reused (master...reduce_opt_ts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7257
00:17 < GitHub159> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/de9e5ea75e46...d964b5bb1a1c
00:17 < GitHub159> bitcoin/master fa0765d MarcoFalke: [qa] Cleanup wallet.py test...
00:17 < GitHub159> bitcoin/master fa14d99 MarcoFalke: [qa] check if wallet or blochchain maintenance changes the balance
00:17 < GitHub159> bitcoin/master fa33d97 MarcoFalke: [walletdb] Add missing LOCK() in Recover() for dummyWallet
00:17 < GitHub11> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7229: [qa] wallet: Check if maintenance changes the balance (master...MarcoFalke-2015-rpcWalletMaintenance) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7229
00:19 < GitHub29> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.12: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/1ed938b5fe4f5760b516eaec3358f13003830907
00:19 < GitHub29> bitcoin/0.12 1ed938b MarcoFalke: [qa] wallet: Check if maintenance changes the balance...
00:24 < GitHub132> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d964b5bb1a1c...554156093800
00:24 < GitHub132> bitcoin/master fa3c7e6 MarcoFalke: [wallet] Add regression test for vValue sort order
00:24 < GitHub132> bitcoin/master faf538b MarcoFalke: [trivial] Merge test cases and replace CENT with COIN
00:24 < GitHub132> bitcoin/master 5541560 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7293...
00:24 < GitHub49> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7293:  [wallet] Add regression test for vValue sort order  (master...Mf1601-wallet-vValue) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7293
00:25 < GitHub99> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.12: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/ff9b610026067755b1d766c13a212734d96757ea
00:25 < GitHub99> bitcoin/0.12 ff9b610 MarcoFalke: [wallet] Add regression test for vValue sort order...
00:41 -!- p15 [~p15@37.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
00:47 -!- adam3us1 [~Adium@195.138.228.23] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
00:47 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.8] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
00:48 -!- adam3us1 [~Adium@195.138.228.23] has quit [Client Quit]
00:48 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.33] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
00:50 -!- p15 [~p15@8.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:02 -!- Amnez777 [~Amnez777@37.157.216.149] has quit [Changing host]
01:02 -!- Amnez777 [~Amnez777@unaffiliated/amnez777] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:11 -!- randy-waterhouse [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/randy-waterhouse] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
01:27 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]
01:27 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:34 -!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:42 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
02:02 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:02 -!- p15_ [~p15@50.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:05 -!- p15 [~p15@8.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
02:12 -!- kdfjksdfsdf [c7f191db@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.199.241.145.219] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:12 -!- kdfjksdfsdf [c7f191db@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.199.241.145.219] has quit [Client Quit]
02:15 < jtimon> wumpus I'm still on vacation and kind of waiting on #7091 before continuing with the "document-with-words-and-pictures" I promised to some people, but...what is the "right time for refactors and moveonlies"? I really don't want to miss it for the consensus encapsulation moveonly again
02:15 < jtimon> I mean something like this https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/f8c34f27d4020880647cbdbafad70793882cef79 (after #7287 )
02:15 < jtimon> it was supposed to be after major version forks, right? or is it after the major released is actually done (to avoid interfering with backports)?
02:36 -!- blur3d [~blur3d@d114-78-36-245.rdl805.qld.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:41 -!- MarcoFalke [05c7b6cb@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.5.199.182.203] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:56 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
02:58 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:58 < GitHub189> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/554156093800...7b0a9a804004
02:58 < GitHub189> bitcoin/master 6cd198f Marcel Krüger: Removed comment about IsStandard for P2SH scripts...
02:58 < GitHub189> bitcoin/master 7b0a9a8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7266...
02:58 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has quit [Excess Flood]
02:58 < GitHub11> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7266: Removed comment about IsStandard for P2SH scripts (master...zauguin-patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7266
03:00 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:00 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has quit [Excess Flood]
03:00 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:21 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has quit [Excess Flood]
03:22 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:23 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has quit [Excess Flood]
03:23 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:25 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has quit [Excess Flood]
03:25 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:25 -!- BashCo_ [BashCo@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-zenltuufgingrsqn] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:27 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.33] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
03:29 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
03:30 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has quit [Excess Flood]
03:30 -!- berndj [~berndj@azna.co.za] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
04:05 < MarcoFalke> cfields, is depends using `reference_datetime` (from gitian), another fake time or no at all?
04:20 -!- p15_ [~p15@50.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
04:22 < GitHub126> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7b0a9a804004...b1cf0058d9b3
04:22 < GitHub126> bitcoin/master faf3299 MarcoFalke: [qt] Intro: Display required space...
04:22 < GitHub126> bitcoin/master b1cf005 Jonas Schnelli: Merge pull request #7298...
04:22 < GitHub141> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #7298: [qt] Intro: Display required space (master...Mf1601-qtDataDir) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7298
04:25 < morcos> jonasschnelli: yes i think its that same thing we discussed in november.  sipa gave me an idea for how to hack it in, i should have something in a few hours. 
04:26 < jonasschnelli> morcos: Okay. Perfect.
04:29 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38791.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
04:53 -!- blur3d [~blur3d@d114-78-36-245.rdl805.qld.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Quit: blur3d]
04:58 < GitHub122> [bitcoin] jtimon closed pull request #7238: Blocksize: Some small preparations for a blocksize hardfork (master...6526-6625-remainings-0.13.99) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7238
05:01 < jtimon> sipa see my question to wumpus, do you know when is the right time for refactors/moveonlies? after 0.12 has been forked or after 0.12 has been finally released?
05:09 < MarcoFalke> jtimon, I think the best time is between 0.12.0-final and 0.13-branchoff. You don't want to conflict any backports, so better wait until 0.12.0 (or even until 0.12.1 is out).
05:10 < MarcoFalke> If the refactor is not controversial, it should also be backported, imo.
05:10 -!- teward [teward@ubuntu/member/teward] has quit [Quit: The Darkness Will Rise Again.]
05:11 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
05:12 < jtimon> MarcoFalke: I agree on both accounts (refactors before forking and backport disruptive refactors)
05:13 -!- teward [teward@ubuntu/member/teward] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
05:14 < jtimon> but wumpus (and sipa?) think it's better to do them after and I was told to wait for https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/f8c34f27d4020880647cbdbafad70793882cef79 (I just can't remember if they said "wait after 0.12 is branched" or "wait until 0.12 is released")
05:15 < MarcoFalke> Maybe, "wait after 0.12 is branched" AND "wait until 0.12 is released"? ;)
05:18 -!- brg444 [18257df2@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.37.125.242] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
05:19 -!- wumpus [~quassel@pdpc/supporter/professional/wumpus] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
05:21 -!- wumpus [~quassel@pdpc/supporter/professional/wumpus] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
05:24 < jtimon> MarcoFalke: yes, maybe, I just don't want to miss "the big moveonlies window" again like I did on 0.11.99 and 0.12.99...
05:26 < jtimon> I would interpret that as Bitcoin Core not considering libconsensus or consensus code encapsulation a priority
05:27 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
05:40 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
05:41 < wumpus> jtimon: well priority right now is fix the last minute nits for the 0.12 release
05:41 < wumpus> and segwit, in which sipa I think included some of your changes
05:55 < jtimon> wumpus so is it unreasonable for me to expect something like https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/f8c34f27d4020880647cbdbafad70793882cef79 to be merged in the 0.13.99 "refactor window" (whenever that is)?
06:01 < jtimon> if so, I'm afraid I'll have to step down on the self-assigned task of finishing libconsensus (for my own sanity)
06:03 < wumpus> e.g.  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6597  is due to be merged, but seems there were some last minute comments
06:03 < jtimon> I mean, I'll do it on top of 0.12, but I'll stop rebasing and PRing to Bitcoin Core
06:03 < jtimon> wumpus: #6597 has nothing to do with consensus code encapsulation
06:04 < wumpus> ok
06:04 < jtimon> I only have #7287 and #7091 related to libconsensus and open right now
06:05 < jtimon> so, wumpus, is it unreasonable for me to expect something like https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/f8c34f27d4020880647cbdbafad70793882cef79 to be merged in the 0.13.99 "refactor window" (whenever that is)?
06:06 < wumpus> yeah we could do some move-only things for 0.13 soon, together with c++11-ication I do expect some code churn anyway
06:07 < wumpus> that specific commit looks sensible to me, good to have that out of main.cpp
06:09 < jtimon> great, so when is the "refactor window"? now or after releasing 0.12 ?
06:10 < wumpus> now - after releasing 0.12, doesn't matter, 0.12 branch is forked off so 0.13/master can have some more intensive/risky changes
06:11 < jtimon> I see, I thought maybe we didn't wanteed to do that before releasing 0.12 for easier backports
06:12 < wumpus> nah, that's true, but backporting over move-only isn't that involved
06:12 < wumpus> if possible I want to tag 0.12.0rc1 tomorrow so 0.12 release isn't far away
06:12 < jtimon> well, my plan was to do the moveonly after #7287
06:13 < jtimon> (to avoid needing FormatStateMessage() from consensus/consensus.cpp temporarily)
06:13 < wumpus> I mean you could say the same for the segwit stuff, moving consensus related files around gives work there, but otoh rebasing that over moveonly isn't going to be rocket science
06:14 < jtimon> ok, thank you
06:16 < jtimon> I'll open it soon (among other things, as an alternative to CodeShark's #6774 )
06:16 < CodeShark> #6747
06:17 < CodeShark> no moving consensus stuff yet...just the soft fork activation mechanism
06:18 < CodeShark> making it easier to deploy testnets with specific bips applied
06:18 < CodeShark> and leaving thr activation mechansm fully open ended
06:23 < Luke-Jr> wumpus: btw, in case you missed it the other day: I don't plan to do any further rebasing, so just let me know when PRs are ready for merging and I can do the appropriate merge commit
06:24 < btcdrak> wumpus: just to confirm, dev meeting tonight right? 7pm UTC?
06:24 < Luke-Jr> right
06:31 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:32 < jtimon> CodeShark: as said I would prefer something like https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/401a951a70c666ef65c5d059c8b108c6e49abedb I don't see how #6747 makes it easier to deploy testnets with specific bips applied anyay...
06:33 < GitHub86> [bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #7308: [Tests] Eliminate intermittent failures in sendheaders.py (master...fix-sendheaders) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7308
06:35 < GitHub68> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #7309: [0.12] Update release-notes.md (0.12...Mf1601-releaseNotes0.12) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7309
06:36 < morcos> jonasschnelli: sipa: wumpus: any preference for name of forgettransaction?  forget, abandon, respend, archive, discard, ditch, vacate ? i think i vote for abandon
06:36 < jtimon> CodeShark: and you really don't need to touch the old softfork stuff to implement bip9, that's actually one of the complains rusty had about your implementation (he didn't in his)
06:36 < MarcoFalke> or discard
06:36 < jgarzik> Luke-Jr, +100
06:38 < morcos> Luke-Jr: jgarzik: I'm much newer at this than most, but someone will need to tell me how I'm supposed to review a PR with merge conflicts and if I just review it off the branch its based off of, how do I know the merge conflicts will be solved properly.
06:39 < jgarzik> morcos, "merge conflicts solved problem" is by definition a moving target.  Review as checked out from submitted branch.  When it's ready to merge, attend those issues at that time.
06:39 < morcos> I think it makes much more sense for most patches to be rebased, maybe only not for big long standing branches, of which there are not too many, but then will need to be reviewed twice in my opinion.
06:40 < jgarzik> morcos, It's a subjective judgement of the distance between submitted branch and currently.  For example:  mempool janitor PR is submitted.  Later, some other major mempool changes are merged into master.  It is fair to ask the author to merge with master. 
06:40 < jtimon> morcos: I'm sure Luke-Jr would be happy to let you rebase his commits if you think it's very important
06:41 < jgarzik> luke-jr's linked Linus post did a good job of explaining
06:41 < jgarzik> *fair to ask the author to merge with master on his branch, making his branch current.
06:41 < jgarzik> (to be clear)
06:41 < jgarzik> The focus is on the submitted branch
06:42 < morcos> yes i read linus' arguments and i think they applied to a substantially different work flow than we have on a much more mature code base, but whatever, i defer to wumpus 
06:42 < jtimon> I think it's also fair for an author to get tired of rebasing
06:42 < MarcoFalke> Especially if there is major merge conflicts, there are different ways to solve them. Shouldn't the merge commit be part of the PR then?
06:42 < jgarzik> MarcoFalke, yes, correct
06:42 < jgarzik> That's the ideal workflow
06:43 < MarcoFalke> jtimon, I don't think there is a difference in merge/rebase in regard to solving conflicts
06:44 < Luke-Jr> the difference is whether it breaks decentralised development
06:44 < jtimon> MarcoFalke: unless I'm missing something, Luke-Jris just tired of rebasing and wants to do it only one last time before Bitcoin Core is ready to accept his patch
06:44 < MarcoFalke> No
06:44 < jgarzik> jtimon: read what luke-jr just said
06:45 < jtimon> jgarzik: MarcoFalke Luke-Jr yep, it looks like I'm missing something
06:45 < Luke-Jr> jtimon: http://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg39091.html https://lwn.net/Articles/328436/
06:46 < jtimon> Luke-Jr: thanks
06:48 < jtimon> mhmm, I have rebased cfields' commits in the past (although after doing it for several months with no success I gave up)
06:49 -!- rubensayshi [~ruben@c89225.upc-c.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:51 < wumpus> morcos: I think I prefer 'archivetransaction'
06:51 < wumpus> morcos: it sounds the least destructive
06:52 < wumpus> btcdrak: yes re: meeting
06:52 < jgarzik> +1 wumpus RE archivetx
06:53 < wumpus> Luke-Jr: that's up to you, I think rebasing PRs can be useful, I like a linear-ish history, but if you can do an alternative with merges that accomplishes the same that's the same to me...
06:53 < morcos> wumpus: ok i'm happy to change to whatever people prefer but the reason i didn't go with archive originally was it sounded something like record keeping to me, and didn't indicate that it would have an economic effect.
06:54 < morcos> of course i guess it doesn't actually have an economic effect, it just changes your guess as to what the economic effect of the tx is so you can double spend
06:54 < wumpus> morcos: I'd interpret archive as in 'remove from the active set and stash in the archive somewhere', but sure there's more ways to interpret it, the most important is that the RPC is documented
06:55 < MarcoFalke> What is "the archive somewhere"?
06:55 < btcdrak> morcos: rusty kindly tested #6564 with both #6312 and #7184 variants so we should make a decision about closing one of those soon.
06:55 < wumpus> I do think archive can potentially give confusion, e.g. people will think they can archive old transactions as well
06:55 < wumpus> MarcoFalke: mark it as non-active, but it stays stored in the wallet, hidden
06:55 < morcos> wumpus: so to be clear the way im thinking about this the tx is still going to appear in your list of txs and everythign and it will still show 0 confirmations, but it will no longer effect the spentness of the txin prevouts
06:55 < btcdrak> morcos: I can add your diff commit to #6312 or we can close it in favour of #7184 which is cleaner imo
06:55 < wumpus> morcos: ok
06:56 < wumpus> morcos: I do think it should no longer be sorted at the top, at least
06:56 < morcos> wumpus: ha.  ok something else for me to learn about the wallet then
06:56 < wumpus> but hiding it completely (unless some flag) is fine with me too... it's effectively out of the picture
06:57 < wumpus> showing it is just confusing, and sorting it at the top gives priority to it
06:57 < morcos> wumpus: i actually think that is a bit dangerous. it could still be included in a block or coudl prevent a respend from relaying if its in other nodes mempools
06:57 -!- xiangfu [~xiangfu@58.101.250.18] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:57 < wumpus> sure it could be included in a block, but in that case it must be shown again like any transaction that's in a block
06:57 < morcos> wumpus: once we have RBF implemented, i think we'd require that you pass the RBF requirements to the extent you can determine them to respend it
06:58 < morcos> wumpus: so you may want to be aware that you have this potential double spend out there instead of literally forgetting about it
06:58 < wumpus> still hiding it when it reached you through a block would indeed be very wrong
06:58 < wumpus> but is it always 'out there'? what if it was never broadcasted at all?
06:58 < morcos> wumpus: well i'll probably do the PR first without looking at sorting, just to get something for people to look at anyway
06:59 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:59 < MarcoFalke> wumpus, archive means "something is final, I can put it in a box and it won't change" but that is not the case here.
06:59 < morcos> wumpus: ah! i've been thinking about that.  we are narrowing the number of cases where thats possible i think.  although i guess if you have broadcast off
06:59 < wumpus> a feature to hide transactions is extremely frequently requested, people get annoyed at all the stale transactions that drift to the top
06:59 < wumpus> MarcoFalke: well, feel free to propose a better name then
06:59 < wumpus> I won't partake in bikeshedding
07:00 < wumpus> +English is not my native language
07:00 < MarcoFalke> mine neither
07:00 < MarcoFalke> I think the pull itself is more important
07:00 < wumpus> absolutely
07:00 < morcos> ok i'm going with abandon until i here otherwise, back to work
07:00 < wumpus> morcos: ok
07:00 < morcos> s/here/hear/ and English is my only language
07:01  * Luke-Jr regrets English being his only fluent language
07:01 < morcos> btcdrak: I have a pretty strong preference for #7184, but i really want to hear what sipa thinks before making a decision.
07:01 < morcos> Luke-Jr: same
07:03 < midnightmagic> Luke-Jr: learn mandarin :)
07:09 -!- treehug88 [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:21 -!- bsm1175321 is now known as bsm117532
07:34 -!- modin [~modin@213-64-115-210-no86.tbcn.telia.com] has quit [Quit: ZNC - 1.6.0 - http://znc.in]
07:35 -!- modin [~modin@213-64-115-210-no86.tbcn.telia.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:52 -!- modin [~modin@213-64-115-210-no86.tbcn.telia.com] has quit [Quit: ZNC - 1.6.0 - http://znc.in]
07:52 -!- _Sam-- [~meat@ec2-52-192-143-219.ap-northeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:52 -!- _Sam-- [~meat@ec2-52-192-143-219.ap-northeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com] has quit [Changing host]
07:52 -!- _Sam-- [~meat@unaffiliated/sam--/x-573746] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:53 -!- modin [~modin@213-64-115-210-no86.tbcn.telia.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:03 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Quit: laurentmt]
08:32 -!- xiangfu [~xiangfu@58.101.250.18] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
08:36 -!- trippysalmon [rob@2001:984:6466:0:51d:b5ab:ab61:bed8] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
08:44 -!- Naphex [~naphex@xotika.tv] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:44 -!- Naphex [~naphex@xotika.tv] has quit [Changing host]
08:44 -!- Naphex [~naphex@unaffiliated/naphex] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:45 -!- _Sam-- is now known as Greybits
08:46 < GitHub180> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #7310: MOVEONLY: Move consensus functions out of main (master...consensus-moveonly-0.13.99) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7310
08:52 < GitHub59> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #7311: MOVEONLY: non-consensus: from pow to chain: (master...consensus-pow-moveonly-0.13.99) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7311
08:54 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:56 -!- Squidicuz [~squid@pool-173-48-117-206.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:57 < jtimon> wumpus ^^ the moveonly PRs
09:01 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.31] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:03 -!- trippysalmon [rob@2001:984:6466:0:51d:b5ab:ab61:bed8] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:06 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Quit: laurentmt]
09:08 < jtimon> regarding #6597 I think sipa is wrong, but as said that's not libconsensus related
09:12 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:17 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Quit: laurentmt]
09:31 -!- trippysalmon [rob@2001:984:6466:0:51d:b5ab:ab61:bed8] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
09:33 < GitHub116> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #7312: Add RPC call abandontransaction (master...forgetstuck) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7312
09:37 < phantomcircuit> morcos, lol you're super late for 0.12
09:40 < Luke-Jr> no kidding
10:01 -!- brg444 [18257df2@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.37.125.242] has quit [Quit: Page closed]
10:07 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:10 -!- BashCo_ [BashCo@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-zenltuufgingrsqn] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
10:27 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
10:28 < morcos> wumpus: see the weird Travis failure on #7312, something about not being able authenticate windows packages
10:28 -!- Greybits [~meat@unaffiliated/sam--/x-573746] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
10:30 < MarcoFalke> You can change the commit hash of your last commit to trigger travis again. (If no one reviewed your commits, it shouldn't matter)
10:30 -!- cryptopeddler [NSA@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-jxrrqqxbzjjmqwjg] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
10:30 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:30 < MarcoFalke> or you can fix the typo in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7312/files#diff-df7d84ff2f53fcb2a0dc15a3a51e55ceR1783
10:31 -!- d_t [~textual@c-50-136-139-144.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:36 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:36 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@173-26-115-141.client.mchsi.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:37 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38791.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
10:38 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38791.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:47 -!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@80.57.227.14] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:51 < Yoghur114_2> this may be too trivial to ask here, but in building the segwit fork - I now appear to require the libevent-dev package, which I didn't have
10:51 < Yoghur114_2> looking at configure.ac, it appears to have been added as a test in january of last year https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/3140ef92493169f1f993312b4add1fb87943c7b4
10:52 < Yoghur114_2> any clue as to why this is the first time ./configure fails while I've built the project many times since that added test?
10:52 < Yoghur114_2> on ubuntu 14.04 that is
10:55 < wumpus> for building master (or anything derived from it) you need libevent-dev it replaces boost asio
10:56 -!- arubi is now known as fIatland
10:56 -!- fIatland is now known as arubi
11:00 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:02 -!- brg444 [415ce066@gateway/web/freenode/ip.65.92.224.102] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:04 -!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-143-141.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
11:13 < phantomcircuit> Yoghur114_2, libevent-dev has been required since the rpc stuff was changed
11:16 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
11:17 < Yoghur114_2> what rpc stuff changed? that might explain why my interface has borked
11:17 < sipa> Yoghur114_2: 0.12 and master use libevent for RPC handling jnstead of boost::asio
11:22 < Yoghur114_2> aah ok, I get it now - thanks guys
11:24 < Yoghur114_2> I shall now continue to discover I am too poorly versed at interpreting the actual code :)
11:25 -!- davec [~davec@cpe-24-243-251-52.hot.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
11:27 < phantomcircuit> Yoghur114_2, please point out what/where you are confused, it's helpful to know where there should be more comments
11:29 < Yoghur114_2> it isn't the comments, it's me: I'm a Java developer by trade
11:29 < Yoghur114_2> :)
11:30 -!- Madars [~null@unaffiliated/madars] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
11:30 < Yoghur114_2> so i'll be having a hard time understanding anything even if it's documented to all hell
11:30 -!- PRab_ [~chatzilla@68.34.102.231] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:30 -!- Arnavion [arnavion@unaffiliated/arnavion] has quit [Disconnected by services]
11:31 -!- Arnavion3 [arnavion@unaffiliated/arnavion] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:31 -!- Arnavion3 is now known as Arnavion
11:31 -!- treehug8_ [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:31 -!- arowser_ [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:31 -!- treehug8_ [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
11:32 -!- treehug8_ [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:34 -!- aj_ [aj@cerulean.erisian.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:34 -!- treehug88 [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
11:38 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: aj, CodeShark, PRab, modin, MarcoFalke, arowser
11:40 -!- Netsplit over, joins: modin
11:40 -!- davec [~davec@cpe-24-243-251-52.hot.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:44 -!- CodeShark [sid126576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-bgxboebvjwjmiryd] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:48 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
11:48 -!- Greybits [~meat@unaffiliated/sam--/x-573746] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:49 < Yoghur114_2> phantomcircuit: ok I've identified the confusion more precisely (for the record): it was a git thing. What I didn't understand was why a 0.11.2 build didn't trigger this test: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/configure.ac#L717 - which I thought was added january 20th of 2015 according to the history, however, that commit was part of a PR that only got merged into master last september - after master branched off from .11
11:49 < sipa> Yoghur114_2: we started working on the 0.12 branch nearly a year ago
11:50 < sipa> 0.11.2 was released from the stable branch
11:50 < sipa> 0.12 is now about to mature into a release
11:51 -!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-143-141.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:52 < Luke-Jr> cfields: /usr/include/boost/thread/future_error_code.hpp:36:53: error: ‘enum_type’ is not a member of ‘boost::future_errc’
11:52 < Luke-Jr> this is latest stable boost on Gentoo
11:54 < cfields> Luke-Jr: thanks, will have a look after meeting
11:57 -!- zookolaptop [~user@172.56.12.25] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:01 < cfields> Luke-Jr: i can't find any reference to future_error_code.hpp. what boost version?
12:01 < cfields> (at that path, anyway)
12:08 -!- MarcoFalke [05c7b6cb@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.5.199.182.203] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:14 -!- zookolaptop [~user@172.56.12.25] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
12:23 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:27 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Client Quit]
12:39 -!- treehug8_ [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]
12:39 -!- treehug88 [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:46 < Luke-Jr> cfields: 1.56.0-r1
12:56 -!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-143-141.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
12:58 -!- alexpi____ [dcf43808@gateway/web/freenode/ip.220.244.56.8] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13:00 < alexpi____> hji
13:01 -!- alexpi____ [dcf43808@gateway/web/freenode/ip.220.244.56.8] has quit [Client Quit]
13:02 < cfields> Luke-Jr: got it, thanks
13:02 < cfields> Luke-Jr: can you paste the whole nasty error please?
13:04 < Luke-Jr> cfields: http://codepad.org/a5GoNVqQ
13:04 < cfields> Luke-Jr: i think i see. looks like we might need the force defs in a few other places
13:05 < cfields> hmm
13:14 -!- Arnavion [arnavion@unaffiliated/arnavion] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
13:14 -!- Arnavion [arnavion@unaffiliated/arnavion] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13:16 < Luke-Jr> MarcoFalke: #7081's conflicts are too trivial for a pre-pull merge.
13:18 < maaku> harding: as a matter of process, it would have been nice to have more time before merging things like #1194
13:18 < maaku> putting something significant like this up and then merging three hours later isn't a good idea
13:19 -!- go1111111 [~go1111111@104.200.154.72] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
13:21 < cfields> Luke-Jr: are you compiling in c++11 mode there?
13:24 < Luke-Jr> cfields: yes
13:24 < Luke-Jr> it works fine in non-C++11 mode
13:24 < cfields> do you know if boost was built with c++11?
13:24 < Luke-Jr> it was not.
13:24 < Luke-Jr> no major distro builds boost with C++11
13:24 < cfields> (trying to determine if the test is faulty)
13:24 < cfields> ok, good
13:25 < cfields> that looks like a legitimate boost bug, but ofc that seems unlikely
13:25 < cfields> sec for link
13:25 < cfields> https://github.com/boostorg/core/commit/9092fde17ed8bf30b2564d884a774134b53ae127
13:26 -!- Madars [~null@unaffiliated/madars] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13:26 < cfields> can you do a quick hack of your local source to check a fix?
13:27 < Luke-Jr> Bitcoin source or boost?
13:27 < cfields> boost
13:27 < Luke-Jr> I'll have to rebuild boost a few times, but I guess so
13:28 < cfields> i think only changing the header should be enough
13:29 < cfields> sec for patch
13:37 < cfields> Luke-Jr: http://pastebin.com/raw/jG5ag45p
13:39 -!- Greybits [~meat@unaffiliated/sam--/x-573746] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
13:39 < cfields> i think just patching boost in-place with that and rebuilding bitcoin should do it, no need to rebuild boost
13:43 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
13:45 < Luke-Jr> cfields: http://codepad.org/s4lin37Q
13:46 < cfields> Luke-Jr: yea, sorry. nuke the first template, they do the same thing
13:46 < cfields> so just: http://pastebin.com/raw/MC4xJ51H
13:50 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: aj_, Guest87962
13:51 -!- Netsplit over, joins: aj_, Guest87962
13:53 < Luke-Jr> cfields: that leaves me at /usr/include/boost/filesystem/operations.hpp:492: undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
13:53 < Luke-Jr> which is bound to be an ABI issue
13:54 < cfields> hmm, weird. that's the one that this should've fixed
13:55 < cfields> Luke-Jr: did you autogen/reconfigure ?
13:55 < Luke-Jr> not since patching the header
13:55 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38791.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
13:55 < cfields> nm, shouldn't matter anyway. the right things are obviously defined
13:55 -!- treehug88 [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]
13:55 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38791.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13:56 < cfields> well, one thing at a time...
13:56 < Luke-Jr> complete rebuild from autogen doesn't have a difference
13:56 < cfields> i guess i should take that patch upstream
13:57 < jgarzik> git clean -dfx
13:57 < jgarzik> when changing deps
13:57 < Luke-Jr> jgarzik: that would destroy so much data of mine..
13:57 < Luke-Jr> jgarzik: also, this is using system deps
13:57 < cfields> though in our case, 1.60 is the only version affected :\
13:58 < cfields> oh wait
13:58 < cfields> yea, 1.56. sorry.
13:59 < Luke-Jr> fwiw, the actual symbol is boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option>>>>>>::enum_type<<<<<<<<<<, boost::system::error_code*)
14:01 < cfields> Luke-Jr: can you see which object it comes from?
14:01 < Luke-Jr> ?
14:04 < cfields> hmm, i thought nm would tell you that. sec.
14:04 -!- Greybits [~meat@unaffiliated/sam--/x-573746] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14:08 < Luke-Jr> cfields: why are you defining FORCE_BOOST_EMULATED_SCOPED_ENUMS in bitcoin-config.h rather than BOOST_NO_SCOPED_ENUMS and BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS ?
14:09 < cfields> Luke-Jr: because i prefer to only define local things in that header when possible, so that usage is more explicit
14:10 < Luke-Jr> this is caused by some other header pulling in the relevant header before the latter get defined
14:10 < Luke-Jr> it's not a local thing, though, it's a boost configuration
14:11 < cfields> Luke-Jr: i'll admit, i went back and forth on it in this case. looks like you may be right
14:13 < cfields> Luke-Jr: i don't see a path that would cause it to be included somewhere else first, though
14:13 < Luke-Jr> cfields: can't assume boost doesn't do it internally..
14:14 < cfields> Luke-Jr: simple test, comment out the filesystem.hpp include in walletdb.cpp. fails to build as expected for me.
14:16 < Luke-Jr> confirmed http://codepad.org/uwX0co4G builds..
14:17 < cfields> Luke-Jr: ok, great. i think you're probably right about the global define.
14:17 < Luke-Jr> wallet/db.h includes #include <boost/filesystem/path.hpp>
14:17 < Luke-Jr> this is included from walletdb.h
14:17 < Luke-Jr> so we also need to include bitcoin-config.h before that
14:18 < cfields> yup, got it. i grepped for filesystem.hpp and missed it.
14:18 < Luke-Jr> note that test_bitcoin is hanging
14:18 -!- go1111111 [~go1111111@104.232.116.217] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14:18 < Luke-Jr> nm, it finally finished
14:19 < cfields> any chance the header patch isn't needed now that things aren't defined two ways?
14:21 < Luke-Jr> hmm
14:21  * Luke-Jr testing
14:29 < Luke-Jr> cfields: seems to work!
14:29 < cfields> weird
14:32 < cfields> probably some voodoo wrt template instantiation
14:32 < cfields> either way, glad that's all it takes :)
14:32 < cfields> you going to pr it or want me to?
14:34 < Luke-Jr> go ahead, I just started a bisect
14:34 < cfields> ok
14:34 < cfields> thanks for tracking it all down!
14:35 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38791.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
14:35 < Luke-Jr> cfields: np, thanks for doing all the hard part
14:39 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]
14:41 < morcos> sipa: wumpus: this has nothing to do with my abandon code, but i discovered in testing.
14:42 < morcos> what should happen if you have a tx in your mempool that becomes conflicted b/c of a double spend in a block (so its other inputs are now freed to respend, after #7306)
14:42 < morcos> and then that block gets reorged out and the double spend goes away?
14:43 < morcos> (i should say i _think_ it has nothing to do with my abandon code)
14:47 < Luke-Jr> cfields: do you have access to bitcoincore.org?
14:47 < Luke-Jr> https://bitcoincore.org/depends-sources/sdks/MacOSX10.7.sdk.tar.gz is 403'ing
14:47 < cfields> Luke-Jr: as intended :)
14:47 < Luke-Jr> cfields: which breaks Travis..
14:48 < cfields> hmm, travis should have access
14:48 < cfields> pr# ?
14:48 < Luke-Jr> https://travis-ci.org/luke-jr/bitcoin/jobs/100937885
14:49 < Luke-Jr> *how* should Travis have access? O.o
14:50 < cfields> Luke-Jr: it's by ip, just a best effort
14:50 < Luke-Jr> i c
14:51 < Luke-Jr> well, I guess there's another IP to add in the log..
14:52 < cfields> Luke-Jr: looking into it
15:11 < cfields> Luke-Jr: i think that should do it
15:20 -!- Greybits [~meat@unaffiliated/sam--/x-573746] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
15:32 -!- MarcoFalke [05c7b6cb@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.5.199.182.203] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]
15:43 -!- brg444 [415ce066@gateway/web/freenode/ip.65.92.224.102] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
15:44 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15:51 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
15:51 -!- randy-waterhouse [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/randy-waterhouse] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16:05 < GitHub125> [bitcoin] calebogden opened pull request #7313: Found and fixed some typos (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7313
16:12 < Luke-Jr> cfields: still no good https://travis-ci.org/luke-jr/bitcoin/jobs/100945755
16:12 < cfields> Luke-Jr: yea, just saw. testing locally
16:26 -!- sean__ [7a386462@gateway/web/freenode/ip.122.56.100.98] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16:46 -!- sean__ [7a386462@gateway/web/freenode/ip.122.56.100.98] has quit [Quit: Page closed]
17:13 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:14 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:23 < Chris_Stewart_5> What does OP_CODESEPARATOR do? The description is "All of the signature checking words will only match signatures to the data after the most recently-executed OP_CODESEPARATOR."
17:24 < Chris_Stewart_5> so it is just the index of a signature?
17:25 < Chris_Stewart_5> the actually code in core says pbegincodehash = pc;
17:29 -!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@80.57.227.14] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
17:44 -!- droark [~droark@c-24-22-36-12.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: Later.]
17:44 -!- droark [~droark@c-24-22-36-12.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:58 -!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
18:18 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rjlbmlhtvtlfghuk] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
18:25 -!- phantomcircuit [~phantomci@strateman.ninja] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
18:30 -!- phantomcircuit [~phantomci@strateman.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:00 -!- brg444 [415ce066@gateway/web/freenode/ip.65.92.224.102] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:05 -!- orbiting [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:10 < sipa> Chris_Stewart_5: historic cruft
19:21 -!- orbiting [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
19:22 -!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
19:23 -!- orbiting [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:23 -!- orbiting_ [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:26 -!- orbiting [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has quit [Client Quit]
19:27 -!- orbiting_ [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:27 -!- orbiting [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:28 -!- orbiting_ [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:28 -!- p15 [~p15@36.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:28 -!- orbiting_ [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:37 -!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:42 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
19:44 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:51 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:52 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:55 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:55 -!- wallet421 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:55 -!- wallet421 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Changing host]
19:55 -!- wallet421 [~wallet42@unaffiliated/wallet42] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:55 -!- wallet421 is now known as wallet42
19:55 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@unaffiliated/wallet42] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:55 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:56 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:56 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:56 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:56 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:57 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:57 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:58 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
19:59 -!- brg444 [415ce066@gateway/web/freenode/ip.65.92.224.102] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
20:01 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:01 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
20:08 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:09 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
20:11 -!- brg444 [415ce066@gateway/web/freenode/ip.65.92.224.102] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:23 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:25 -!- d_t [~textual@c-50-136-139-144.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
20:25 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
20:27 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@173-26-115-141.client.mchsi.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
20:38 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:38 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
20:59 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:59 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
20:59 -!- wallet421 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:59 -!- wallet421 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Changing host]
20:59 -!- wallet421 [~wallet42@unaffiliated/wallet42] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:59 -!- wallet421 is now known as wallet42
20:59 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@unaffiliated/wallet42] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
20:59 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:00 -!- brg444 [415ce066@gateway/web/freenode/ip.65.92.224.102] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
21:01 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
21:01 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:04 -!- xiangfu [~xiangfu@115.197.236.182] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:06 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
21:30 -!- xiangfu [~xiangfu@115.197.236.182] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
21:31 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:35 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
21:48 -!- orbiting [~orbiting@24.244.23.158] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
21:52 -!- Thireus1 [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:56 -!- Thireus [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
22:08 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
22:08 -!- deego1 [~user@unaffiliated/deego] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:09 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:09 -!- deego [~user@unaffiliated/deego] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
22:10 -!- Thireus [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:12 -!- Thireus1 [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
22:12 -!- Thireus1 [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:16 -!- Thireus [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
22:30 -!- Thireus [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:34 -!- Thireus1 [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
22:37 -!- xiangfu [~xiangfu@115.195.55.96] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:38 -!- randy-waterhouse [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/randy-waterhouse] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
22:48 -!- xiangfu [~xiangfu@115.195.55.96] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
22:51 -!- d_t [~textual@c-98-234-64-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:56 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-lvrkegwlfbumypww] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:00 -!- p15 [~p15@36.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
23:09 -!- d_t [~textual@c-98-234-64-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
23:10 -!- p15 [~p15@83.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:25 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:29 -!- xiangfu [~xiangfu@114.242.250.253] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:36 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
23:37 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@176.9.70.183] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:37 -!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:43 -!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
23:47 -!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:51 -!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
23:52 -!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]