--- Day changed Sun Feb 12 2017
00:00 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:4d4f:f515:1114:c55a] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
00:01 -!- goksinen_ [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:5aa:8d98:8d29:1e07] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
00:03 -!- goksine__ [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:a823:1217:e092:9681] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
00:04 -!- dodomojo [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:89a4:98c9:c071:b242] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
00:05 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:4d4f:f515:1114:c55a] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
00:06 -!- goksinen_ [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:5aa:8d98:8d29:1e07] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
00:07 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:6851:a81b:bc78:7bfb] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
00:09 -!- harrymm [~wayne@191.96.49.84] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]     
00:10 -!- goksine__ [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:a823:1217:e092:9681] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
00:16 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:6851:a81b:bc78:7bfb] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
00:31 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:e006:a3c3:d713:deaa] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
00:35 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:e006:a3c3:d713:deaa] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
00:42 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
00:51 -!- Victor_sueca is now known as VIctorsueca     
00:51 -!- VIctorsueca is now known as Victorsueca     
00:52 -!- harrymm [~wayne@191.96.49.108] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
01:38 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] 34ro opened pull request #9745: [RPC] Getting confirmations command (master...add-getconfirmations-to-rpc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9745
01:56 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
02:12 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
02:49 -!- zzaj12 [~jazzybee@host-92-5-245-243.as43234.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
02:49 -!- zzaj12 [~jazzybee@host-92-5-245-243.as43234.net] has left #bitcoin-core-dev ["Leaving"]     
03:06 -!- Victorsueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]     
03:07 -!- Victorsueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
04:09 -!- FiveBroDeepBook [~gk.1wm.su@46.148.182.82] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
04:09 -!- FiveBroDeepBook [~gk.1wm.su@46.148.182.82] has left #bitcoin-core-dev []     
04:20 -!- MarcoFalke [~marco@host10-2.natpool.mwn.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
05:18 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:e006:a3c3:d713:deaa] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
05:23 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@2604:2000:c591:8400:e006:a3c3:d713:deaa] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
06:21 -!- MarcoFalke [~marco@host10-2.natpool.mwn.de] has quit [Quit: MarcoFalke]     
06:29 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
06:48 -!- d9b4bef9 [~d9b4bef9@web419.webfaction.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
06:49 -!- d9b4bef9 [~d9b4bef9@web419.webfaction.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
06:49 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
06:51 -!- udiWertheimer [~udiWerthe@bzq-82-81-94-166.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
07:14 -!- justanotheruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
07:14 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]     
08:14 -!- Soligor [~Soligor@unaffiliated/soligor] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
08:16 -!- Soligor [~Soligor@unaffiliated/soligor] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
08:29 -!- FiveBroDeepBook [~gk.1wm.su@2606:f180:1:df:df:121e:9695:caa6] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
08:29 -!- FiveBroDeepBook [~gk.1wm.su@2606:f180:1:df:df:121e:9695:caa6] has left #bitcoin-core-dev []     
08:37 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
08:48 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] kobake opened pull request #9747: Vs2015 (master...vs2015) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9747
08:50 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] kobake closed pull request #9747: Vs2015 (master...vs2015) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9747
09:02 -!- udiWertheimer [~udiWerthe@bzq-82-81-94-166.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
09:04 -!- lclc [~lclc@unaffiliated/lclc] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
09:24 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has quit [Quit: laurentmt]     
09:34 -!- kewde[m] [kewdematri@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-qzgqvvgfdgdhknix] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
09:36 -!- frabrunelle [frabrunell@safenetwork/frabrunelle] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]     
09:36 -!- lclc [~lclc@unaffiliated/lclc] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
09:48 -!- str4d [~str4d@host-78-145-19-22.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
09:57 -!- lclc [~lclc@unaffiliated/lclc] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
10:04 < arubi> I think I'm building the crediting transaction from script_tests.json wrong.  I can pass tests that don't have a checksig in them, but (e.g.) a p2pk test fails with a bad signature.  here's an example of both cases:  https://paste.fedoraproject.org/555262/92264814/raw/  .  the tests describe the crediting tx structure right at the beginning of the script_tests.json file.  would appreciate your input.
10:20 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] vosa88 opened pull request #9748: config.txt (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9748
10:21 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #9748: config.txt (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9748
10:44 -!- udiWertheimer [~udiWerthe@bzq-84-111-23-225.cablep.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
10:54 -!- RealM9 [~androirc@balticom-142-92-236.balticom.lv] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
10:55 -!- RealM9 [~androirc@balticom-142-92-236.balticom.lv] has left #bitcoin-core-dev []     
10:56 -!- RealM9 [~androirc@5.254.97.103] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
10:57 -!- RealM9 [~androirc@5.254.97.103] has quit [Client Quit]     
11:09 -!- kewde[m] [kewdematri@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-hewqhluqvjqqmjna] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
11:18 -!- jtimon [~quassel@245.30.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
11:19 -!- frabrunelle [frabrunell@safenetwork/frabrunelle] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
12:08 < jonasschnelli> sipa: re https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9743/files ...
12:08 < jonasschnelli> is std::unique_ptr<Secp256k1Init> ecc; not equivalent to ecc.reset(new Secp256k1Init());
12:09 < sipa> jonasschnelli: no
12:09 < jonasschnelli> I know I miss something... but I wonder what
12:09 < sipa> jonasschnelli: a unique_ptr is initialized to nullptr by default
12:09 < jonasschnelli> I stepped it in lldb and got a non nullptr after std::unique_ptr<Secp256k1Init> ecc;
12:09 < jonasschnelli> But maybe a -O0 issue?
12:10 < sipa> jonasschnelli: you must be doing something wrong :)
12:10 < jonasschnelli> heh.. okay. I see the point now.
12:12 < jonasschnelli> Ah. Yes. __first_ = 0x0000000000000000
12:12 < jonasschnelli> The question then remains, how could this have worked before your PR. :)
12:43 < sipa> because the secp library does right now not actually need a check the ctx pointer ther
12:43 < sipa> but it declares that argument is required to be nonnull
12:44 < sipa> so with sanitizers on, that's enforced at runtime
12:45 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@cpe-74-71-4-175.nyc.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
12:48 -!- handlex [~handlex@2804:14c:658f:4dc7:e09d:cf2d:98af:9f2d] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
12:48 -!- handlex [~handlex@2804:14c:658f:4dc7:e09d:cf2d:98af:9f2d] has quit [Client Quit]     
12:48 -!- handlex [~handlex@2804:14c:658f:4dc7:e09d:cf2d:98af:9f2d] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
12:50 -!- handlex [~handlex@2804:14c:658f:4dc7:e09d:cf2d:98af:9f2d] has quit [Client Quit]     
12:52 -!- handlex [~handlex@179.214.98.122] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
13:00 -!- handlex [~handlex@179.214.98.122] has quit [Quit: handlex]     
13:00 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Quit: Leaving]     
13:02 -!- lclc [~lclc@unaffiliated/lclc] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
13:42 -!- lightningbot [~supybot@2400:8901::f03c:91ff:febb:bbc1] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
13:45 -!- lightningbot [~supybot@2400:8901::f03c:91ff:febb:bbc1] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
13:53 -!- str4d [~str4d@host-78-145-19-22.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
13:57 -!- str4d [~str4d@host-78-145-19-22.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
14:10 -!- justan0theruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
14:10 -!- justanotheruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]     
14:27 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 0.4.2]     
14:28 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/chrisstewart5/x-62865615] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
15:36 -!- justanotheruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
15:37 -!- justan0theruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
15:54 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
16:09 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #9749: If -spkreuse=0, ensure transactions in mempool always have unique scriptPubKeys (master...unique_spk_mempool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9749
16:09 -!- jtimon [~quassel@245.30.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]     
16:28 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
16:33 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
16:35 -!- str4d [~str4d@host-78-145-19-22.as13285.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving]     
16:37 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@105.red-81-33-161.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
16:37 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@105.red-81-33-161.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has quit [Changing host]     
16:37 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
16:46 < gmaxwell> luke-jr: it would be interesting if there were a 1 bit flag in scriptpubkeys that indicated if you wanted to allow reuse or not.
16:50 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-165-227-45-190.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]     
16:50 -!- Giszmo [~leo@ip-253-233.219.201.nextelmovil.cl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
17:29 < luke-jr> gmaxwell: enforcing it consistently would require an ever-growing set, so this is more useful to simply discourage it in general
17:29 < gmaxwell> it would just be "best effort"
17:30 < gmaxwell> e.g. I promise no two in the last N blocks, beyond that, "probablistic"
17:30 < luke-jr> I can't think of any reason to ever intentionally accomidate reuse.
17:30 < gmaxwell> widespread practice.
17:31 < gmaxwell> an improvement no one uses is not an improvement.
17:31 < luke-jr> widespread practice needs to change; people enabling this puts pressure on others to stop doing it
17:31 < luke-jr> especially people doing more transaction volume
17:31 < BlueMatt> how? only realistically if its off-by-default, which we cant do, or if miners use it, which they wont
17:32 < sdaftuar> i haven't read this patch carefully, but is there anything to prevent an attacker from interfering with relay by sending a low-fee, low-value transaction to an output that he sees, and relaying that ahead of the original tx?
17:32 < gmaxwell> and what if the net effect is just someone standarziding that wallets should notice their scriptpubkey with a dummy push also strapped to it?
17:32 < gmaxwell> oh slick point.
17:32 < luke-jr> sdaftuar: there isn't. perhaps it should use RBF semantics in that case
17:33 < sdaftuar> this seems like a solution looking for a problem imo
17:33 < gmaxwell> well there are problems it would help with.
17:34 < gmaxwell> for example,, if you take some old addresses and spend all the connected coins, people have frequently then sent near dust amounts to them, seemingly with the hope that you'll spend the dust in another transaction and link the outputs.
17:34 < morcos> luke-jr: also to clarify (sorry for not just reading the code), if there are already multiple outputs encumbered by the same scriptpubkey, does this patch prevent spending more than one of them at a time?
17:35 < gmaxwell> no, it's just a creation restriction AFAICT.
17:35 < luke-jr> morcos: it doesn't prevent that.
17:35 < luke-jr> it restricts spending as well, but allows multiple of them in the same tx
17:35 < morcos> ok, the exception in your PR text confused me..   that's good at least!
17:35 < luke-jr> brb     
17:35 < morcos> wait... so it does prevent that unless you put them in the same TX????
17:37 < jcorgan> is there a particular reason bitcoin.conf only allows IP parameters by address and not hostname/dns name, other than "it hasn't been written yet"?
17:37 -!- goksinen [~goksinen@cpe-74-71-4-175.nyc.res.rr.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
17:37 < morcos> for the record, i agree with the basic gist of discouraging address reuse, but i think its crazy to make it an absolute.  i've reused (And continue to reuse) addresess many times... its a choice of convenience over.. eh.. maybe some loss of privacy
17:38 < morcos> for instance if your change output is readily discernible already..
17:38 < gmaxwell> luke-jr: probably more important is that more outputs shouldn't be made to an address once it's been spent from (and ideally wallets would spend from that address all at once)
17:40 < midnightmagic> morcos: Also, loss of privacy for other people who deal with you.
17:40 -!- Giszmo [~leo@ip-253-233.219.201.nextelmovil.cl] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]     
17:40 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-165-227-45-190.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
17:43 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-jlfdsyrfkbmtbmgw] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]     
17:50 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-165-227-45-190.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
18:05 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
18:26 < luke-jr> morcos: it's not absolute; you can wait until the transaction is mined
18:27 < luke-jr> it occurs to me the current PR already breaks RBF, so I need to fix that :/
18:31 < luke-jr> I suppose it should just treat SPK overlaps as if they shared a conflicting input
18:31 < luke-jr> solve both issues at once
18:32 < morcos> i think it makes no sense at all to have an option that makes it difficult for people to spend previously created outputs
18:32 < morcos> i'd be opposed to that
18:33 < morcos> i mean i'm basically opposed to the option in general..  but if its just an option and it defaults off..  well you have to pick your battles
18:33 < morcos> but if it prevents spending existing outputs.. that seems crazy
18:33 < luke-jr> you can spend them in separate blocks or in the same tx
18:34 < luke-jr> there is no reason anyone should ever have multiple tx in the same block anyway
18:35 < sipa> right, but why would miners enable that setting?
18:35 < sipa> and if miners don't, why would anyone else?
18:36 < sipa> i like the reasons... but it's noneconomical
18:36 < luke-jr> because some miners actually care about Bitcoin
18:36 < morcos> honestly i think this is the kind of change that should go into something like Knots
18:38 < luke-jr> I don't like the direction Core is changing to where everything must be exclusively economic incentives. Bitcoin can't work with mere economic incentives as things are today. The way things are heading, Core is no longer a reference implementation, but a specific political agenda to the exclusion of others.
18:39 < sipa> luke-jr: the only criteria for non-miner mempools is the expectancy of what will confirm
18:39 < sipa> for miners, i would argue that any non-economical property is a push for a certain policy
18:39 < sipa> the economical one is that i expect everyone to take eventually
18:40 < luke-jr> sipa: I see it more of that non-miner mempools constrain miners, by creating slower propagation of blocks that don't match the wider network policies.
18:40 < luke-jr> sipa: economical is also a certain policy. options are options.
18:40 < sipa> luke-jr: divergence between non-miners and miners just encourages people to submit directly to miners, and miners to be reachable (and thus non-anonymous)
18:41 < sipa> i think that's a far worse outcome than just rational policies
18:41 < luke-jr> lack of divergence creates centralisation pressures forcing miners to all run the same policy dictated by developers
18:41 < morcos> i would argue that a minimum bar for an option is that at least the majority of Core developers think its a good idea OR a good fraction of the user community think its a good idea
18:41 < morcos> we can't support every fringe option
18:42 < sipa> luke-jr: my assumption is that if we'd introduce non-economical policies, and they're configurable they'd be turned off, and if they're not configurable someone will create a patch to change them
18:43 < sipa> by the vast majority of miners
18:43 < morcos> i also dislike the use of policy as something that tries to constrain users to use bitcoin in a certain way..  if its not necessary for DoS prevention or resource allocation, then good usage policies/options should be at the wallet level 
18:44 < morcos> relay and mining should be essentially blind to any attribute of txs other than resource usage (which is unfortunately a multi-dimensional beast)
18:44 < luke-jr> I don't see many miners turning on acceptnonstdtxn. Or enabling full RBF (although some do exist). Miners do care to an extent, and that will hopefully improve as difficulty kills profits.
18:45 < luke-jr> morcos: that is not a sustainable view, at least as things are today. but more importantly, I concede your right to take that position, but you need to understand not everyone agrees with it.
18:46 < sipa> luke-jr: ok, i'll reformulate: my expectation is that over time we'll converge to more rational relay policies... not because developers force it, but because it's the most economical thing to do
18:46 < luke-jr> economical != rational
18:46 < sipa> short-term vs long-term?
18:46 < luke-jr> perhaps
18:47 < luke-jr> it's rational to filter SPK reuse in hopes of improving Bitcoin privacy, for example
18:47 < sipa> the only thing that actually improves privacy IMHO is consensus rules that incentivize it
18:48 < morcos> luke-jr: i'd be much more amenable to that argument if the Core wallet stopped SPK reuse..  having relay be difficult in the even of SPK reuse seems like it risks causing more harm than good
18:48 < luke-jr> neither developers nor miners control consensus rules. but miners do control policy.
18:49 < morcos> luke-jr: right!  that's why we need to work towards a bitcoin where there is no policy!!  all txs look the same
18:49 < luke-jr> no, policy is important.
18:49 < sipa> yes, let's switch to MimbleWimble. all txs look the same!
18:49 < sipa> luke-jr: in my ideal world, there can't be any policy beyond fees/size, because there is nothing else that distinguishes two transactions
18:50 < luke-jr> sipa: that's not everyone's ideal world.
18:50 < sipa> the fact that you can even say whether two outputs use the same address is a fungibility flaw on itself
18:50 < sipa> the fact that miners have censorship rights at all is a weakness
18:50 < luke-jr> I suppose
18:50 < luke-jr> no, miners are supposed to "censor" spam
18:50 < luke-jr> that's part of how the system works
18:51 < sipa> i agree with you, but only in its "development phase"... which may last a long time
18:51 < luke-jr> ?     
18:51 -!- ChatSharp [~ChatSharp@stc.66.70.188.95.dsl.krasnet.ru] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
18:51 < sipa> everyone should cooperate to make the system as usable as possible while it is not perfect
18:52 < luke-jr> morcos: btw, Core wallet never reuses SPKs
18:52 < sipa> but eventually, it will need to work in a very-close-to-perfectly-rational environment
18:52 < luke-jr> sipa: okay, I think I agree on that.
18:52 < sipa> that doesn't mean that has to happen today
18:53 < luke-jr> IMO Lightning will help take a big step toward that
18:54 < sipa> maybe
18:54 < luke-jr> well, in theory since legit txs will probably drop in blockchain data usage vs spam
18:54 -!- ChatSharp [~ChatSharp@stc.66.70.188.95.dsl.krasnet.ru] has left #bitcoin-core-dev []     
18:54 < luke-jr> hopefully that will increase the feerate of legit use beyond the point where spam is more economic
19:06 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
19:06  * luke-jr ponders if a town will ever be named std::<something> XD
19:11 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]     
19:46 -!- wdfwefewvfgew [~gk.1wm.su@2001:590:1405:2e4:2e4:762d:9e59:405b] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
19:46 -!- wdfwefewvfgew [~gk.1wm.su@2001:590:1405:2e4:2e4:762d:9e59:405b] has left #bitcoin-core-dev []     
20:07 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
20:12 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
21:09 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
21:13 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
21:42 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] rohundhar opened pull request #9750: Bloomfilter: parameter variables made constant (master...bloomVar) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9750
22:50 -!- lclc [~lclc@unaffiliated/lclc] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
22:51 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
23:12 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ccsrwyotvqjjnqtj] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
23:29 -!- harrymm [~wayne@191.96.49.108] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
23:37 -!- udiWertheimer [~udiWerthe@bzq-84-111-23-225.cablep.bezeqint.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]     
23:39 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
23:43 -!- wasi [~wasi@gateway/tor-sasl/wasi] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
23:44 -!- wasi [~wasi@gateway/tor-sasl/wasi] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
23:52 -!- harrymm [~wayne@191.96.49.7] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev     
23:55 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]