--- Log opened Fri Apr 07 00:00:25 2023
00:01 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@user/AaronvanW] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
00:45 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@user/AaronvanW] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
00:59 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:04 -!- tromp [~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
01:15 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@user/AaronvanW] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
01:25 -!- pakaro [~quassel@cst2-172-130.cust.vodafone.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:29 -!- pakaro [~quassel@cst2-172-130.cust.vodafone.cz] has quit [Client Quit]
01:46 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@user/AaronvanW] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:56 -!- wudu_ [~wudu@dynamic-077-190-185-240.77.190.pool.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
02:00 -!- miod[m] [~miodmatri@2001:470:69fc:105::2:d219] has quit [Quit: You have been kicked for being idle]
02:25 -!- someone235 [uid419897@id-419897.ilkley.irccloud.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
02:48 -!- greypw25460021 [~greypw254@grey.pw] has quit [Quit: I'll be back!]
02:48 -!- greypw25460021 [~greypw254@grey.pw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
02:51 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@user/AaronvanW] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
03:24 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@user/AaronvanW] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
04:56 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net] has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
06:26 -!- wudu_ [~wudu@dynamic-077-190-185-240.77.190.pool.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
06:54 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:42 -!- tromp [~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
09:54 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has quit [Quit: = ""]
10:00 -!- stoner19 [~stoner19@user/stoner19] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
10:30 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@user/AaronvanW] has quit [Quit: Leaving...]
11:24 < harding> I'm writing an explainer about schnorr-based multisignatures and threshold signatures in the context of Bitcoin where we also explain OP_CHECKMULTISIG-based multisig.  I've been finding it convenient to call the opcode-based construction "script multisignatures/threshold signatures" and the non-opcode version "scriptless multisignatures/threshold signatures" to distinguish between them.  Is there any reason that's terrible terminology?  I don't 
11:24 < harding> think it materially conflicts with the idea of scriptless scripts, which is a term readers may later encounter, and which is the only potential conflict I've thought of so far.
11:52 < andytoshi> I think this is fine
11:52 < andytoshi> and it is consistent with the other use of "scriptless scripts" I think, so hopefully won't cause confusion
13:15 < harding> andytoshi: thanks!
13:35 -!- tristan_ [~tristan_@122.50.206.51] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
13:37 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net] has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
14:14 -!- EleYah [~ElEYah@cpe-70-121-74-63.austin.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: EleYah]
16:28 -!- wudu_ [~wudu@dynamic-077-190-185-240.77.190.pool.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
19:13 -!- wudu_ [~wudu@dynamic-077-190-185-240.77.190.pool.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
19:39 -!- Saloframes [~Saloframe@user/Saloframes] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
21:47 -!- tristan_ [~tristan_@122.50.206.51] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
21:51 < _aj_> harding: that terminology does seem convenient
--- Log closed Sat Apr 08 00:00:26 2023