2015-04-11.log

--- Log opened Sat Apr 11 00:00:49 2015
-!- hktud0 [wq@unaffiliated/fluffybunny] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]00:06
-!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@210.207-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]00:06
-!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@210.207-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:07
-!- hktud0 [ncidsk@unaffiliated/fluffybunny] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:08
-!- AllieSenbub1 [~AllieS@c-98-210-139-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]00:36
-!- AllieSenbub [~AllieS@c-98-210-139-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:37
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]00:42
-!- Pan0ram1x [~Pan0ram1x@095-096-084-122.static.chello.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]00:45
-!- Pan0ram1x [~Pan0ram1x@095-096-084-122.static.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:52
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]01:03
-!- andy-logbot [~bitcoin--@wpsoftware.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]01:04
-!- andy-logbot [~bitcoin--@wpsoftware.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:05
* andy-logbot is logging01:05
-!- aakselrod [~kvirc@pool-96-253-123-21.rcmdva.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]01:11
-!- aakselrod [~kvirc@pool-96-253-123-21.rcmdva.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:12
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:13
-!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]01:14
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:18
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:21
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:22
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.184.143] has quit [Excess Flood]01:24
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.184.143] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:28
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:36
-!- DrGrid [b2c5e2d1@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.178.197.226.209] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:45
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@95.6.28.61] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:49
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:49
-!- AllieSenbub [~AllieS@c-98-210-139-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]01:54
-!- iugfhvybu [~vfbtgn@86.127.129.247] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]01:55
-!- RoboTedd_ [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:59
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]02:01
-!- RoboTedd_ [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]02:03
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]02:17
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]02:25
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/erasmospunk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:27
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@86.127.129.247] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:36
-!- jtimon [~quassel@189.Red-83-59-238.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:42
-!- Crowley2k [~Crowley2k@93.113.62.93] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:43
-!- Crowley2k [~Crowley2k@93.113.62.93] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:43
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@95.6.28.61] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]02:44
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/erasmospunk] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]02:48
-!- luktgf [~vfbtgn@188.27.91.213] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:49
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@178.162.211.232] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:50
-!- jtimon [~quassel@189.Red-83-59-238.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]02:51
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@86.127.129.247] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]02:51
-!- luktgf [~vfbtgn@188.27.91.213] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]02:58
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]03:07
-!- pollux-bts [uid52270@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mwsttptobbkobydi] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]03:14
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:14
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@86.121.71.250] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:22
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]03:24
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]03:29
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:30
-!- jtimon [~quassel@189.Red-83-59-238.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:32
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@178.162.211.232] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]03:34
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]03:34
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]03:36
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@86.121.71.250] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]03:42
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@5-12-204-46.residential.rdsnet.ro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:44
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:304:cff8:1580:c047:8aeb:b953:a993] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:50
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@178.162.211.217] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:07
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:15
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@5-12-204-46.residential.rdsnet.ro] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]04:16
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Quit: Bye]04:17
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:29
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Client Quit]04:30
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:31
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@5-12-204-46.residential.rdsnet.ro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:31
-!- crowleyman [crowleyman@gateway/shell/bnc4free/x-rexassodomyzfrvm] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]04:33
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]04:35
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f10af17.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:42
-!- jgarzik [~jgarzik@unaffiliated/jgarzik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:49
-!- adam3us [~Adium@modemcable130.142-161-184.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:54
-!- jtimon [~quassel@189.Red-83-59-238.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]04:59
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]05:00
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:07
-!- HostFat_ [~HostFat@adsl-ull-187-93.42-151.net24.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]05:14
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:15
-!- skeuomor1 [~skeuomorf@unaffiliated/skeuomorf] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:20
-!- skeuomor1 is now known as skeuomorf05:20
-!- jhogan42 [~jhogan42@c-67-169-168-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]05:26
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:27
-!- jb3000 [32bed4de@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.50.190.212.222] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:29
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:31
-!- skeuomorf [~skeuomorf@unaffiliated/skeuomorf] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]05:32
-!- skeuomorf [~skeuomorf@unaffiliated/skeuomorf] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:33
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]05:36
-!- jb3000 [32bed4de@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.50.190.212.222] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]05:37
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]05:48
-!- zooko [~user@184-96-103-97.hlrn.qwest.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:49
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:51
-!- recalcitrant22 [~ubuntu@static-108-45-93-93.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:54
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]05:59
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:02
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]06:03
-!- zooko [~user@184-96-103-97.hlrn.qwest.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]06:11
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]06:15
-!- adam3us [~Adium@modemcable130.142-161-184.mc.videotron.ca] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]06:25
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:32
-!- fanquake [~fanquake@unaffiliated/fanquake] has left #bitcoin-wizards []06:34
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]06:37
-!- btcdrak [uid52049@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-cazuamsllwhyeliq] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]06:39
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:49
-!- skeuomorf [~skeuomorf@unaffiliated/skeuomorf] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]06:50
-!- btcdrak [uid52049@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fiwshphqjvilvbbg] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:56
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:00
-!- Guest68867 is now known as amiller07:00
-!- amiller [~socrates1@li175-104.members.linode.com] has quit [Changing host]07:00
-!- amiller [~socrates1@unaffiliated/socrates1024] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:00
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@5-12-204-46.residential.rdsnet.ro] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]07:06
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@188.27.89.70] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:07
-!- zmachine [uid53369@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ijjooeomkazaaayv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:15
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:304:cff8:1580:c047:8aeb:b953:a993] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]07:24
-!- binaryFate [~binaryFat@94-139-57-95.dsl.billi.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:35
-!- skeuomorf [~skeuomorf@unaffiliated/skeuomorf] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:40
-!- p15x [~p15x@182.50.108.93] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]07:43
-!- p15x [~p15x@60.247.108.99] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:45
gmaxwellhttps://plus.google.com/103188246877163594460/posts/WTrnyFsRmHv08:05
jcorgancongrats08:07
fluffyponygo rusty!08:07
amillernice08:09
-!- recalcitrant22 [~ubuntu@static-108-45-93-93.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]08:26
-!- nessence [~alexl@c-68-51-194-2.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:29
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:34
-!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:34
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]08:34
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:35
-!- recalcitrant22 [~ubuntu@108.61.68.145] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:38
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]08:39
kanzure.title08:43
yoleauxLeaving IBM May 4. Joining blockstream.com May 11. In 1997 I went to Usenix's…08:43
-!- satwo [~satwo@unaffiliated/satwo] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:48
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:50
-!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Quit: Leaving]08:50
-!- MoALTz__ [~no@78.11.179.104] has quit [Quit: Leaving]08:53
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@188.27.89.70] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]08:57
-!- DrGrid [b2c5e2d1@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.178.197.226.209] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]08:58
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@188.27.93.162] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:59
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@188.27.93.162] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]09:06
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:09
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]09:13
-!- user7779078 [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-zgxapfpzxsexbtrv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:13
-!- x98gvyn [~vfbtgn@188.27.93.162] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:21
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:24
-!- yorick [~yorick@oftn/member/yorick] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]09:33
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:34
-!- yorick [~yorick@oftn/member/yorick] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:35
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:35
-!- yorick [~yorick@oftn/member/yorick] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]09:35
-!- yorick [~yorick@ip51cd0513.speed.planet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:36
-!- yorick [~yorick@ip51cd0513.speed.planet.nl] has quit [Changing host]09:36
-!- yorick [~yorick@oftn/member/yorick] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:36
-!- yorick [~yorick@oftn/member/yorick] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]09:37
-!- yorick [~yorick@ip51cd0513.speed.planet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:37
-!- yorick [~yorick@ip51cd0513.speed.planet.nl] has quit [Changing host]09:37
-!- yorick [~yorick@oftn/member/yorick] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:37
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]09:39
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]09:40
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]09:44
-!- zmachine [uid53369@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ijjooeomkazaaayv] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]09:46
-!- shesek [~shesek@77.127.158.156] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]09:52
-!- satwo [~satwo@unaffiliated/satwo] has quit []09:53
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:55
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]09:57
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:57
-!- copumpkin [~copumpkin@unaffiliated/copumpkin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:02
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:08
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]10:13
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]10:16
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:23
-!- satwo [~satwo@unaffiliated/satwo] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:23
-!- fanquake1 [~fanquake@203-59-86-189.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:24
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]10:30
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:36
-!- btcdrak [uid52049@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fiwshphqjvilvbbg] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]10:39
-!- HostFat [~HostFat@adsl-ull-187-93.42-151.net24.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:39
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]10:40
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:43
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:44
-!- Crowley2k [~Crowley2k@93.113.62.93] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]10:46
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:49
-!- Crowley2k [~Crowley2k@93.113.62.93] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:50
-!- CodeShark [~textual@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:51
-!- bitbumper [~bitbumper@161.47.143.24.cm.sunflower.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:51
-!- pollux-bts [uid52270@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vbxqtpbbejohthlo] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:52
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:304:cff8:1580:c047:8aeb:b953:a993] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:56
-!- bosma [~bosma@S01067cb21bda6531.vc.shawcable.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]11:01
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:02
-!- btcdrak [uid52049@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-pqwxdboxcfmvlrgu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:06
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:08
-!- jhogan42 [~jhogan42@c-67-169-168-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:12
-!- lclc [~lucas@unaffiliated/lclc] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]11:16
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@178.162.211.217] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]11:21
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]11:28
-!- recalcitrant22 [~ubuntu@108.61.68.145] has quit [Quit: Leaving]11:29
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:30
Taekrusty congrats11:31
-!- nivah [~linker@183.91.30.143] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:31
Taekalso congrats to blockstream11:32
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:41
-!- Crowley2k [~Crowley2k@93.113.62.93] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]11:48
-!- koshii [~0@cm-171-100-165-124.revip10.asianet.co.th] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]11:53
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@unaffiliated/cannacoin] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]11:58
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Quit: Bye]12:07
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]12:13
jgarzikTaek, great addition to the _bitcoin_ dev team :)12:20
jgarzik(meaning the wider bitcoin community)12:20
jgarzikThe BTC community needs more smart, capable people like Rusty.12:20
bsm117532What happened?12:20
andytoshi+1 jgarzik , and congrats rusty12:21
jgarzik<random>12:22
jgarzikI am vaguely tempted to see if I could find funding just to hire a "bitcoin intern" -- take a motivated C/C++'er and teach them bitcoin, to grow the community.  Cheap payroll for me, intern learns bitcoin core, and the bitcoin community grows.12:22
-!- bosma [~bosma@S01067cb21bda6531.vc.shawcable.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:25
-!- p15x [~p15x@60.247.108.99] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]12:26
-!- p15x [~p15x@60.247.108.99] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:30
-!- bosma [~bosma@S01067cb21bda6531.vc.shawcable.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]12:31
morcosyou should definitely do that!  get a Ga Tech CS student for the summer12:32
-!- p15x [~p15x@60.247.108.99] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]12:32
-!- Cornholio [Cornholi0@ip72-193-168-218.lv.lv.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:34
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]12:34
-!- Cornholi0 [Cornholi0@unaffiliated/cornholi0] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]12:34
jgarzikmorcos, yup12:35
-!- bosma [~bosma@S01067cb21bda6531.vc.shawcable.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:38
-!- Guest65932 [~guest@5ED11658.cm-7-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:41
-!- Starduster_ [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]12:44
-!- satwo [~satwo@unaffiliated/satwo] has quit []12:44
-!- Guest65932 [~guest@5ED11658.cm-7-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]12:48
-!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:49
-!- afk11 [~thomas@86.46.16.201] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:52
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:52
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:56
-!- nuke_ [~nuke@176.92.19.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:56
-!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Quit: Leaving]12:58
-!- nuke1989 [~nuke@46-149-36.adsl.cyta.gr] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]13:00
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]13:00
-!- Crowley2k [~Crowley2k@93.113.62.93] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:18
-!- IRCFrEAK [~jircii@dhcp-108-168-3-60.cable.user.start.ca] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:21
-!- IRCFrEAK is now known as thufir13:21
-!- Starduster [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:23
-!- AnoAnon [~AnoAnon@197.37.12.56] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:23
-!- AnoAnon [~AnoAnon@197.37.12.56] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]13:24
thufirSo, my NSA killing project is about to have the first public PREVIEW release. It is cloud 2.0, decentralized. Next step is incentivized. It will use bitcoin. The hash power cannot be split. I grok this. This is a purpose other than enabling cloud 2.0. It gives bitcoin intrinsic value that exists only on the internet (ie, no exchange needed, my project is an exchange for btc->bandwidth,storage,and more). Anyways, I come to ask.13:24
thufirIs bitcoin ready yet!?! IE: I NEED NLOCKTIMEDLAY!!! (or something like that to do probabilitc payments, channels, etc.. i need massive transaction amount)13:24
thufirplease say yes and how...13:25
-!- adam3us [~Adium@207.253.217.242] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:26
sipaif by nlocktimedelay you mean checklocktimeverify (bip 65), feel free to help test the implenentation and contribute13:26
thufirso that is enabled on test net at least?13:27
sipaif you need massive transaction amount, the bitcoin blockchain won't help you (it is directly in conflict with the ability for the world to validate it)13:27
thufirand thank you! for that information (i will read bip65)13:27
sipano, it is not even implemented entirely13:28
thufirsipa: probabibilistic payments13:28
sipawrt killing the NSA: take it elsewhere13:28
thufir1/1bill lotto ticket = 1 billion x transaction count13:28
thufirsure, if you are afraid of satan i understand13:28
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:28
andytoshithufir: keep it civil13:29
thufirandytoshi: i won't mention it again while sipa is around, i am civil.13:29
thufirso is that nlock thing enabled on the test net?13:29
sipai just told you it is not even implemented entirely13:30
sipalet alone an actual deployment plan13:31
sipalet alone being in production13:31
andytoshithufir: it's not just sipa. this channel is about research and technology; while these sort of stuff is hard to separate from the political context there's no need for name-calling or manifesto-type comments13:31
thufirdon't be mad, i wasn't attacking you, i am just done with being afraid of them. we must be open, it is the antidote to their system. if we are open, we find each other. if we are closed, we find allies much slower.13:31
sipafeel free to contribute to its development, however13:31
thufiryes, sorry13:32
kanzureinflammatory comments are obvious and they are very boring13:32
sipathufir: if i was afraid of them i wouldn't be asking you to stop talking about it in a publicly logged channel. this channel is about technical research. anything else is off topic, whether you agree with the statements or not13:33
thufiri said none. only objective pragmatic fact. you are the ones who keep talking about that. i am here to yes, contribute to development13:33
thufirasking me to stop is doing their job, so i would now guess yes, afriad13:33
thufirlets stop talking about it then and talk about development, no?13:33
sipagood13:33
kanzuresipa: if he is this bad at thinking about that topic, why would you expect him to be capable of contributing on other topics13:34
thufirso then, bip 65 is the state of the art in what I seek? (enabling probabilistic payments?) and it isn't implemented even in test net yet? i thought some nlocktimedelay was done and in testnet?13:34
sipai do not know what nlocktimedelay is, nor do i know the state of the art for probabilistic payments13:35
thufirkanzure: not asking him then, but i don't judge, i hope he learns. i am open to all who want to join, regardless of their past.13:35
thufirok, i might have it wrong, sec...13:35
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-180-192-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:35
thufirI guess it is just nLockTime (no delay)13:36
sipado you have some reference for s probabilistic payment scheme that uses nlocktimedelay (and do you have something describing what nlocktinedelay is, if not checklocktimeverify)?13:36
andytoshithufir: i think bip62 (non-malleability) is sufficient for probabilistic payments13:36
thufirwell, bip-65 is referenced as "revisiting nLockTime" by qntra.net13:37
thufiri found now in search, thanks to you guys so thanks, and no hard feelings, i am just forward13:37
thufiroh awesome andy!13:37
thufiris that implemented in at least test net? :( :)13:37
thufirbecause yes, only flaw of probabilistic payments is the darn malliability13:38
sipabip62 is not fully implemented13:38
thufirbecause fixing malliability would save on tracactions.. nLockTime would require transactions still and might not really work for probabilisitc payments at the scale i know that fixing malliability would13:39
andytoshithufir: you can build and test systems which depend on bip62 since transactions which violate its restrictions are nonstandard to most nodes13:39
andytoshiactual deployment would need to wait for it to be fully implemented13:40
sipaandytoshi: the low-s rule is not enforced however13:40
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Quit: Bye]13:40
andytoshioh, oops, i thought it was13:40
thufiris it implemented enough that i could use testnet as the backing for my system? when you guys are ready i switch it over? testnet would be enough as my system is not gold if you loose it, just bandwidth13:40
sipano, it is not implemented enough13:41
sipanowhere13:41
thufirah ok, thank you!13:41
sipaand implementation is not sufficient: you need the actual network to adopt it13:42
thufirwell, i might be joining your dev team to help because the free world needs cloud 2.0, and cloud 2.0 needs bitcoin (i refuse to use an alternative like creating a filecoin, i already know it must be bitcoin)13:42
thufirbut that sucks cause it will slow me down13:43
sipawth is cloud 2.0?13:43
sipastop using buzzwords13:43
thufirmy project. my purpose in life.13:43
fluffyponysipa: it's just before cloud 3.013:43
fluffyponyand inbetween IAAS 1.5 and SAAS 2.813:43
thufirok, then you heard it here first. only the "unnamable" knows its name, and one friend. now you all do: morphis13:44
thufirit deprecates bittorrent to start13:44
sipawhitepaper? research? code? design documents?13:45
thufir3 months in the coding, years and years of thinking and planning.13:45
fluffyponyguitar lessons: http://www.morphis.com13:45
fluffypony.title13:45
yoleauxBeginner Guitar Lessons :: morphis.com13:45
thufiri say maybe a month until preview release that will sufficiently deprecate bittorrent13:46
thufiryes, i don't care13:46
thufirmorph.is13:46
thufir:)13:46
thufireat your heart out guitar guy13:46
thufiroh btw, i taught myself classical guitar, will check out your site :)13:46
kanzurewhat is your opinion of mkultra13:46
fluffyponywhere's bramc when you need him...13:46
thufirmight be what created me,13:46
fluffyponythufir: it's not my site13:46
thufirah :( i could use more guitar expert friends13:47
thufirkanzure: why do you ask?13:47
thufirwell, i also know it to be a failure. unless you wanted your control of the interenet to be lost13:48
thufirI see. we'll i guess I'll wait for Todd. Thanks for the info so far though guys.13:54
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]13:56
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@2601:8:a380:e29:81cc:502:a98b:d6f0] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:57
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@2601:8:a380:e29:81cc:502:a98b:d6f0] has quit [Changing host]13:57
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@unaffiliated/cannacoin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:57
-!- Sub|afk [~SubCreati@2601:8:a380:e29:c555:5318:daf2:c953] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:07
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@unaffiliated/cannacoin] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]14:09
-!- Sub|afk is now known as SubCreative14:11
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@2601:8:a380:e29:c555:5318:daf2:c953] has quit [Changing host]14:11
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@unaffiliated/cannacoin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:11
-!- dardasaba [~cinch@ec2-52-10-119-235.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:14
-!- PRab [~chatzilla@2601:4:400:2105:91f6:b3f4:6f79:f8e6] has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.91.1 [Firefox 36.0.4/20150320202338]]14:15
-!- dardasaba [~cinch@ec2-52-10-119-235.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:15
thufirso what is the low-s rule?14:16
-!- dardasaba [~cinch@ec2-52-10-119-235.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:16
-!- PRab [~chatzilla@2601:4:400:2105:91f6:b3f4:6f79:f8e6] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:16
-!- nullbyte [~WW@unaffiliated/loteriety] has quit [Quit: leaving]14:16
-!- hhogan420 [~WW@unaffiliated/loteriety] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:17
andytoshithufir: ECDSA sigs consist of a pair of numbers (s, r) which each live in a field of order roughly 2^256; turns out for each (s, r) that ($field_order - s, r) is also a valid sig, creating a degree of freedom that an attacker can use to change data on the wire (which doesn't affect any functionality but can confuse things); the low-s rule says that only one of these is actually valid, removing that14:18
andytoshidegree of freedom14:18
thufirso low-s means the sig is only valid if it is the lowest possible sig? so it is not implemented yet because? i guess it is impossible to know the lowest possible s (ie, someone might know math that would calculate a valid lower one) ?14:20
andytoshithat's not what it means; it means exactly what i said. it's not implemented because it was overlooked that this degree of freedom could be problematic, it's still not problematic for systems in use today, and changes in a consensus system are slow to happen14:21
thufiryes, i understand. i mean the low-s rule, it means only accept lowest s?14:21
-!- b_lumenkraft [~b_lumenkr@unaffiliated/b-lumenkraft/x-4457406] has quit [Quit: b_lumenkraft]14:22
gmaxwellWhat do you mean not implemented? all Bitcoin Core nodes produce low-s signatures, but it cannot be enforced in the network currently because  it would break existing wallets.14:22
thufirI don't know what you mean by "rule says that only one of these is actually valid". one of what?14:22
thufiroh, is that all?14:23
thufirlike you guys know you know the math to know the lowest s? so you could implement such a rule? if only it didn't break existing wallets with higher s's?14:23
gmaxwellIt's implemented in bitcoin core, but not enforced for other people's transactions.14:23
thufirwow. damn. i understand the problem that we can't force old wallets to have to move their coins. damn14:24
gmaxwellnot move their coins, but not create incompatible transactions.14:24
-!- afk11 [~thomas@86.46.16.201] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:25
thufirso can't it be simple like: if coins come from < block (351720) then don't apply low-s rule, otherwise, transaction must be low-s to be accepted?14:25
gmaxwellGreat, and now your coins are all stuck becuase you have some unupgradable hardware wallet.14:26
thufirbecause that hardware wallet might genereate a non low-s new address?14:27
thufironly generate14:27
gmaxwellthis has nothing to do with addresses.14:27
gmaxwellIt's the /SIGNATURE/.14:27
-!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:28
Taekwhile people are asking dumb questions: do schnorr signature schemes have curves? I confess I still don't understand them well14:28
thufirhmm, ok i think i see. hardware wallet that makes high-s transaction signatures can't escape its coins14:28
thufirgmaxwell: thank you immensiley. i am thinking :)14:29
thufirit would be too much cpu or something for the rule i proposed to be instead of < block 351720, to instead be: if all input coins to a TX come from low-s signed transactions, then the TX must be low-s as well.14:30
gmaxwellTaek: schnorr is a signature system based on groups where discrete logs are hard.14:30
gmaxwellTaek: it can be used over integer rings or EC or other groups that have the right properties.14:31
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:31
gmaxwellthufir: what software people who send you coins runs doesn't imply anything about the software you run!14:31
thufirbut i mean if me and alice want to do something that requires malliability fixed, then i can transfer my coins into a valid low-s TX if they are not already. then I can do my probablistic TX to alice. she knows that since the coins in this probabilistic TX come from a low-s TX that the lotto ticket is valid?14:34
thufirvalid i mean safe, not winning, you knew that probably14:36
Taekgmaxwell: ok, I think I understand that. You could use secp256k1 as 'g' because discrete logs are hard in that field? But more typically a Schnorr group is used?14:36
gmaxwellI have never personally seen schnorr implemented over an integer ring in deployment.14:37
thufirgmaxwell: does that solve it? ie, anyone else doesn't care about low/high-s. but for those who do because they are looking at a probabilistic ticket, they can know it is valid if it is low-s signed and all input coins come from low-s TXs, because that is the new low-s rule?14:38
thufiryour pause is getting me excited... because it means you haven't found the flaw yet? ;)14:40
gmaxwellthufir: I am unable to decode your request!14:40
thufirlol (crying laugh) :)14:40
gmaxwellwhat the heck is a "probablistic ticket"? :)14:41
thufirprobabilistic payments14:41
thufironly broken due to malleability14:41
andytoshithufir: the problem is that -in transit- somebody can change a signature from low-s to high-s; it doesn't matter if everyone involved agrees to use low-s14:41
thufira cheap way for 1 billion x tx on btc14:41
thufiryes, humans won't like it. but autonomous agents won't mind14:41
gmaxwellI think you need to step back and understand actually the mechenism by which things are broken.14:41
thufirandytoshi: so if that high-s tx has only coins from low-s txs then it won't be accepted with my proposed low-s rule.?14:42
thufirgmaxwell: i think i do understand it :)14:42
gmaxwell(also, I'm not aware of probablistic payment scheme which is broken by malleability)14:42
gmaxwellthufir: the transaction _you_ accept isn't your issue in any case.14:43
thufirif i know the ticket i was given is low-s and matches the rule so low-s rule will be applied then i know the network won't accept any other14:43
andytoshithufir: you're confusing different parts of the system; coins don't come "from txs" (see https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/bitcoin-faq.pdf ) for an explanation of low-s vs high-s see https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/malleability-faq.pdf14:43
thufirandytoshi: thx14:44
gmaxwellthufir: we just explained that the network cannot currently reject violating transactions because that will break existing wallets.14:44
andytoshithufir: btw everything in there about mt gox is probably false14:44
andytoshibut the technical content is correct14:44
thufirgmaxwell: so are you saying one of the probabilistic payments schemes does work 100%?14:44
gmaxwellI'm saying that issues they have are not malleability related.14:45
thufirgmaxwell: even with my altered rule? existing wallets would make non low-s txs, but the coins would come from non... shit, i guess it is random. its coins might be in low-s TXs but its next TX it would ever generate is high-s? that is the issue?14:45
thufirgmaxwell: i've heard that before that the only issue is humans14:45
andytoshithufir: you aren't making sense, please read the PDFs i linked you14:46
thufirgmaxwell: is that what you mean? human acceptance of a losing lotto ticket as payment?14:46
thufirgmaxwell: if that is the only problem, my system doesn't mind that, it understands that is a valid payment.. the risk14:46
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:46
thufirandytoshi: i am, thank you14:46
gmaxwellthufir: thats a problem with it, most people reject the idea very agressively in my expirence. Not the only one.14:46
thufirgmaxwell: ok, that one for me is 100% not relivent. I do understand it, but for my system to use it in the background it doesn't mind what humans think.14:47
thufirgmaxwell: what are the other problems if not malleability?14:47
thufirandytoshi: i did read these back in mtgox days, still thank you14:47
gmaxwellWhat made you think malleability was an issue at all?  All the proposals I've seen have double spending problems.14:48
thufirexactly. isn't that due to malleability?14:48
thufirthat the double spend is possible?14:48
gmaxwellNo.14:48
gmaxwelle.g. you use the same coin to probablistically pay many people concurrently instead of sequentially.14:49
thufirhmm14:49
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]14:50
thufirfrom https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Nanopayments: "If need be, this could be solved with hub servers that nanopayment recipients would use to announce coins currently in use to other nanopayment recipients."14:50
thufirso that is what you are speaking of then14:50
thufirthat is the problem and if i fix that then malliability is for sure not a problem?14:50
gmaxwellthufir: I still have no idea why you thought malleability was an issue to begin with!14:51
thufirbecause my system deprecates 'hub servers' so very well might be the symbiant of bitcoin that fixes nano-payments14:51
gmaxwell(for that application)14:51
gmaxwellthufir: that fix requires they be a semitrusted cosigner on the coins.14:52
thufiri am sorry, it is not fresh in my mind. i realized it when mtgox made it an issue. so i forget the thinking.14:52
andytoshigmaxwell: iirc a payment that goes through is a pair of chained transactions that get confirmed together14:52
andytoshiso there's a potential loss if the first gets marred then confirmed14:53
-!- Cornholio is now known as Cornholi014:53
-!- Cornholi0 [Cornholi0@ip72-193-168-218.lv.lv.cox.net] has quit [Changing host]14:53
-!- Cornholi0 [Cornholi0@unaffiliated/cornholi0] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:53
thufiryes, what andy is saying sounds familiar14:53
thufirif i had a winning ticket they can jam it or whatever he is saying14:53
thufirbefore i broadcast it14:53
gmaxwellandytoshi: in the last protocol I remembered all it did is jam.14:53
thufiri think they invalidate the tx the coins in the winning ticket came from14:53
thufiri can fix the semitructed cosigner to fix the double spend. i believe it in easy due to nature of my system14:54
gmaxwellI find this doubtful.14:54
thufirbut that thing andytoshi is talking about I do not know how to solve unless my low-s rules sounds good??14:54
andytoshigmaxwell: the one in the wiki can't jam, the payer creates a tx and sends it to the payee, that is the entirety of the payment14:54
andytoshithen if it happens to be valid, the payee broadcasts it14:54
gmaxwellandytoshi: yea, indeed.14:55
thufirso by your opinions, the link i sent nanopayments. if my code doesn't mind like a human (that isn't the issue), and i have a magic oracle to register the source tx with like the wiki says: "A hub server would be pretty simple, just a single lookup table. A merchant sends it a reserve message. The server checks that the signature matches the coin. If a reserve is already in effect for that coin, it returns an error, otherwise14:57
thufirOK." (just assume like human problem this doesn't exist), then in your guys exper opinions, the wiki nanopayment is 100% perfect? no malleability problem?14:57
andytoshii also had some idea that double-spending wasn't a problem except with pretty low probability (if you send two payments then 0, 1 or 2 of the will go through; if you double-spend then the "2" case results in theft, but that's unlikely), but i can't remember the details14:57
andytoshiand to double-spend you need your txid guess to be in-range for multiple probabilistic transactions, which if the range is small and random, is unlikely to occur14:57
gmaxwellandytoshi: you _always_ concurrently spend, it's a direct division of your payment, undetectably, proportially to the parallelism you can achieve.14:58
andytoshithufir: ...but i really didn't think these things through, please don't go building systems based on these half-bakked thoughts!14:58
thufirhehe14:58
thufirno thank you so much14:58
andytoshigmaxwell: oh, right, derp14:58
thufirandytoshi: i am sorry to say that i am already 3 months into full time development of it, 1 month until first version (0 bitcoin in it)14:59
thufirandytoshi: but next step is what i've planned for years, since you first proposed nanopayments!14:59
gmaxwellif you have a (semi-)trusted cosigner then you can stop the multiplication.15:00
andytoshithufir: i didn't propose them, it was mike caldwell i think, i had an old article about them that didn't cite him upfront (but it is now fixed to do this)15:00
thufiri stand on the shoulder of giants. credit to you all15:00
thufirthanks both of you for your time so far, i can't thank you enough. well, hopefully my contribution helps15:01
thufirMy name is Sam Maloney, btw. This is my usual nick on freenode. Take care for now.15:04
-!- Sub|afk [~SubCreati@2601:8:a380:e29:143f:7a56:b480:1e1d] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:07
-!- thufir [~jircii@dhcp-108-168-3-60.cable.user.start.ca] has quit [Changing host]15:08
-!- thufir [~jircii@unaffiliated/thufir] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:08
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@unaffiliated/cannacoin] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]15:08
-!- metamarc [~snizysnaz@unaffiliated/agorist000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:15
-!- metamarc [~snizysnaz@unaffiliated/agorist000] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]15:21
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:38
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]16:03
-!- mengine [~mengine@14.84-234-132.customer.lyse.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]16:07
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]16:11
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:11
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has quit [Client Quit]16:11
-!- Sub|afk is now known as SubCreative16:21
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@2601:8:a380:e29:143f:7a56:b480:1e1d] has quit [Changing host]16:21
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@unaffiliated/cannacoin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:21
-!- Crowley2k [~Crowley2k@93.113.62.93] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]16:23
-!- adam3us [~Adium@207.253.217.242] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]16:23
Elielif there's just one extra version of a tx producable through malleability, then couldn't you just produce continuation txs for both versions to effectively make malleability a non-issue?16:27
-!- satwo [~satwo@unaffiliated/satwo] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:28
-!- unlord [~nathan@pool-173-79-149-156.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:44
-!- unlord_ [~nathan@pool-173-79-149-156.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]16:47
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:52
-!- skeuomorf [~skeuomorf@unaffiliated/skeuomorf] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]17:00
-!- d1ggy [~d1ggy@dslb-092-077-241-011.092.077.pools.vodafone-ip.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:03
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@dslb-188-108-088-146.188.108.pools.vodafone-ip.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]17:06
-!- bit2017 [~linker@183.91.30.143] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:13
-!- psgs [~psgs@CPE-58-174-37-49.mjcz1.woo.bigpond.net.au] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:14
-!- nivah [~linker@183.91.30.143] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]17:17
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]17:17
-!- CodeShark [~textual@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:18
thufirEliel: i think there are essentially 2^256 different valid ones, not just one17:22
sipafor ECDSA, just one17:26
sipabut read BIP62, there are many ways through which a transaction can br malleated that does not rely on ECDSA malleability17:27
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]17:28
-!- metamarc [~snizysnaz@unaffiliated/agorist000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:29
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@c-24-13-158-60.hsd1.in.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:33
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@c-24-13-158-60.hsd1.in.comcast.net] has quit [Changing host]17:33
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:33
-!- metamarc [~snizysnaz@unaffiliated/agorist000] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]17:38
-!- fanquake [~fanquake@unaffiliated/fanquake] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:41
hhogan420i conco17:42
hhogan420concur*, if anything the bullet point summary was a really important takeaway for understanding malleability 'vectors'17:43
-!- fanquake1 [~fanquake@203-59-86-189.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]17:43
hhogan420(from BIP62)17:43
-!- user7779078 [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-zgxapfpzxsexbtrv] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]17:56
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:59
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.184.143] has quit [Excess Flood]18:00
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.184.143] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:01
-!- dabura667 [uid43070@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ktcmepgggbkqlalp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:04
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-180-192-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]18:06
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving]18:06
-!- psgs [~psgs@CPE-58-174-37-49.mjcz1.woo.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Quit: Leaving]18:06
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]18:16
-!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]18:24
-!- koshii [~0@cm-171-100-165-124.revip10.asianet.co.th] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:25
-!- bit2017 [~linker@183.91.30.143] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]18:25
-!- koshii [~0@cm-171-100-165-124.revip10.asianet.co.th] has quit [Client Quit]18:26
-!- koshii [~0@cm-171-100-165-124.revip10.asianet.co.th] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:28
-!- adam3us [~Adium@modemcable130.142-161-184.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:32
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has quit [Quit: Leaving]18:54
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@xd9ba10d6.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:01
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has quit [Disconnected by services]19:01
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f10af17.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]19:02
-!- hhogan420 [~WW@unaffiliated/loteriety] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]19:08
-!- zooko [~user@c-75-70-204-109.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:14
-!- Starduster [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]19:24
-!- Starduster [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:25
-!- Sub|afk [~SubCreati@c-76-121-19-166.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:34
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:34
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@unaffiliated/cannacoin] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]19:36
-!- airbreather [~AirBreath@d149-67-99-43.nap.wideopenwest.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]19:37
-!- Sub|afk is now known as SubCreative19:39
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@c-76-121-19-166.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Changing host]19:39
-!- SubCreative [~SubCreati@unaffiliated/cannacoin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:39
-!- airbreather [~AirBreath@d149-67-99-43.nap.wideopenwest.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:41
-!- adam3us [~Adium@modemcable130.142-161-184.mc.videotron.ca] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]19:44
-!- JoiIto [~textual@c-50-137-79-91.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:53
-!- jeremyrubin [~chatzilla@2601:6:8000:4a8:4d86:873e:12b1:f83] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:57
-!- user7779_ [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-penaenjutoztnixw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:08
-!- hhogan420 [WW@unaffiliated/loteriety] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:09
-!- hhogan420 [WW@unaffiliated/loteriety] has quit [Changing host]20:09
-!- hhogan420 [WW@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-inymajjwxkrnvpjn] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:09
rustyHmm, would it ease enforcement of low-s-value normalized txs if bitcoin core flipped non-conformant signatures?  A bit weird, of course, to normalize other peoples transactions...20:10
phantomcircuitrusty, there's nodes that add null padding20:11
phantomcircuitso why not20:11
rustyphantomcircuit: null padding?20:11
siparusty: i don't think it would help20:12
phantomcircuitopenssl didn't correctly enforce the DER minimum encoding rules until very recently20:12
sipaenforcement is about being sure that no malleated form enters the blockchain20:12
sipaphantomcircuit: it also did not intend to20:12
phantomcircuitso you were free to add null padding since it was BER20:12
-!- unlord_ [~nathan@pool-173-79-149-156.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:12
phantomcircuitsipa, the function names indicate someone at some point intended to20:13
phantomcircuitd2i and such20:13
sipawell they have a fully fledger ber decoder20:13
rustysipa: sure, so you start with making them non-standard (but do the normalized step first), then later at some point soft-fork to make them invalid.20:13
phantomcircuit(btw they didn't fix the actual decoder, they merely do a decode/encode/compare)20:13
phantomcircuitsipa, sure but that is a super set of a der decoder20:14
siparusty: that would hurt wallets more than just making it opt-in20:14
sipaphantomcircuit: if the intention was not supporting full ber, they could have used 10 times less code20:15
phantomcircuitto be fair i wouldn't suggest they actually fix the DER functions since it's such a mess of macros20:15
-!- dabura667 [uid43070@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ktcmepgggbkqlalp] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]20:15
sipai am pretty sure that the intention was supporting full ber on decoding20:15
-!- unlord [~nathan@pool-173-79-149-156.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]20:15
phantomcircuitsipa, i was under the impression that DER is simply the minimal encoding of BER20:16
sipaindeed20:16
phantomcircuitis that wrong?20:16
rustysipa: by making it opt-in, you're suggesting some kind of "normalized-only" sighash flag?20:16
siparusty: i am suggesting bip 62 :)20:16
sipanormalizing sighashes is not avoiding malleability... it is making malleability harmless20:17
sipabip 62 provides an opt-in way to have consensus rule enforce a single encoding of a transaction20:17
sipabut bip62 does not protect against a sender re-signing20:17
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:304:cff8:1580:c047:8aeb:b953:a993] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]20:19
rustysipa: Thanks, I missed that nuance when I read "but it cannot be enforced in the network currently because  it would break existing wallets." from gmaxwell in earlier logs.20:19
phantomcircuitsipa, so it looks like DER is strictly a subset of BER with a bunch of encoding constraints intended to maintain 1:1 value:encoding mapping20:20
sipayup20:21
sipaD = distinguished20:21
phantomcircuitso what20:21
-!- [7] [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Disconnected by services]20:21
phantomcircuitsomeone implemented BER because they didn't understand the purpose of DER?20:22
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:22
sipano20:22
phantomcircuitthe decoding function names seem to indicate they intended them to use DER at some point20:22
sipai am pretty sure that the intention was supporting full ber20:22
phantomcircuitthat's mad20:22
sipaeven if the standard says using der20:22
sipaone would want to support more than strictly necessary on input20:23
sipathat was fashionable at some point20:23
sipabe strict on output, not strict on input20:23
rustysipa: a-la Postel20:24
phantomcircuitsipa, ichy20:24
* sipa scratches20:24
phantomcircuitichy not itchy...20:24
sipaah20:25
phantomcircuiti can see that in non security things20:25
sipayup20:25
sipabut even then20:25
sipait makes behaviour unpredictable20:25
-!- binaryFate [~binaryFat@94-139-57-95.dsl.billi.be] has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]20:26
phantomcircuitsipa, sure but for example a date field on some website accepting 2015-03-13 and 03/13/1520:26
phantomcircuitseems reasonable (note not 03/03/15 ...)20:27
phantomcircuitok so maybe bad example...20:27
sipaeven for unix tools etc20:28
sipait results in differences between different platforms/implementation20:29
sipaat least for DER it was well defined what the "correct" subset was supposed to be20:29
sipabut how many people here have actually read the DER standard? :)20:30
rustysipa: using DER/BER was weird in the first place though.  Two 32-byte integers would have been simpler and more optimal.20:31
thufirwhy not just serialize the numbers as straight forward as possible? why use their purposely convoluted standards?20:31
thufirheh, exactly!20:31
sipathufir: ask satoshi20:32
sipai don't think anyone disagrees with this20:32
sipabut change is ridiculously hard20:32
thufirok, i'll get around to it ;)20:32
thufiryea, true. so that is the answer then, hehe20:32
phantomcircuitrusty, there is virtually zero documentation on what the openssl signature structure is20:33
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:34
sipathe code is self-documenting!20:34
phantomcircuit(like 90% of openssl)20:34
thufirmy purposed DER replacement: http://pastebin.com/VvzyRTPB20:34
phantomcircuitsipa, yeah like how the d2i functions are defined by macros at compile time and are roughly impossible to find20:34
sipathufir: we're not using rsa20:34
thufiryes of course, adapt it. mostly a joke on how silly it is to use der/whatever.20:35
sipaoh, sure, fully agree there20:35
thufiryou know, i looked at implementing either TLS or SSH-TRANSPORT in my project. I went with SSH because it took me a couple weeks to do it from scratch from RFCs. Looking at TLS, it would take me a year, and most of that would be implementing the crazy encoding of the certificates. that is practically a turing complete language onto itself. complication is bad, i think put there on purpose. more surface area for bugs.20:38
thufirie, the biggest surface area of attack in my opinion on TLS is the encoding of the certs. encoding. so change is hard, but, keep that in mind is all.20:40
thufirnot saying at all satoshi did. he was pragmatic and chose what tools were available to get 'er done.20:43
-!- JoiIto [~textual@c-50-137-79-91.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]20:45
phantomcircuitthufir, SSH-TRANSPORT being the ssh protocol itself or some sort of transit over ssh using the openbsd ssh-client ?20:51
phantomcircuiti wouldn't suggest reimplementing ssh either...20:51
thufirin the rfcs its broken up into SSH-AUTH, SSH-TRANSPORT, and SSH-CONNECT, essentially the SSH auth, encryption, integrety, and multiplexing20:52
thufirbasically the best damn p2p protocol now thanks to python asyncio and my python asyncio ssh implementation.20:52
thufiri needed a high performance encrypted p2p library. i didn't want to 'invent it myself' and fail at security, so i followed the rfcs. its cool because i can ssh into my program with openssh :)20:53
thufiri would have used paraminko, but as I said, i needed a high perf one, so async io. twisted is twisted, so yea :)20:54
thufiri'll release it lgpl in a few weeks along with my gpl program20:55
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]20:57
-!- sofdg2 [~sofdg2@unaffiliated/sofdg2] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:11
-!- nemela [~000100@unaffiliated/sheer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:12
-!- nemela [~000100@unaffiliated/sheer] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]21:15
-!- ucerron [49cc4c7f@gateway/web/freenode/ip.73.204.76.127] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:22
-!- nullusr1 [~macbook@173.209.46.138] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:24
-!- nullusr1 [~macbook@173.209.46.138] has quit [Client Quit]21:25
-!- zooko` [~user@c-75-70-204-109.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:32
-!- zooko [~user@c-75-70-204-109.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]21:34
-!- zooko` [~user@c-75-70-204-109.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]21:52
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]22:04
-!- bitbumper [~bitbumper@161.47.143.24.cm.sunflower.com] has quit [Quit: Leaving]22:05
-!- ucerron [49cc4c7f@gateway/web/freenode/ip.73.204.76.127] has quit [Quit: Page closed]22:06
-!- Cornholio [Cornholi0@ip72-193-168-218.lv.lv.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:15
-!- Cornholi0 [Cornholi0@unaffiliated/cornholi0] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]22:17
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:20
-!- user7779_ [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-penaenjutoztnixw] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]22:22
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]22:24
-!- Cornholi0 [Cornholi0@unaffiliated/cornholi0] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:27
-!- Cornholio [Cornholi0@ip72-193-168-218.lv.lv.cox.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]22:28
-!- pollux-bts [uid52270@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vbxqtpbbejohthlo] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]22:34
-!- Crowley2k [~Crowley2k@93.113.62.93] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:36
-!- andy-logbot [~bitcoin--@wpsoftware.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]22:43
-!- apoelstra [18e3de9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.227.222.157] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:44
-!- andytoshi [~andytoshi@unaffiliated/andytoshi] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]22:44
-!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]22:45
-!- btcdrak_ [uid52049@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mozngasrfdwgaald] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:46
-!- dasource_ [uid48409@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gngnpmatdmivuwlb] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:46
-!- andytoshi [~andytoshi@unaffiliated/andytoshi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:46
-!- apoelstra [18e3de9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.227.222.157] has quit [Client Quit]22:47
-!- NeatBasisW [quasselcor@irc.bittiraha.fi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:47
-!- jbenet_ [sid17552@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ctnmvcqsuwmfteyi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:47
-!- btc____ [sid40798@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ffumfpwmuyeaxtxk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:48
-!- richardu1 [~richardus@2605:2700:0:3::4713:9a16] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:48
-!- mappum_ [sid43795@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-iemztinuprtswzid] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:49
-!- wump [~quassel@pdpc/supporter/professional/wumpus] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:49
-!- cfields_ [~quassel@unaffiliated/cfields] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:50
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: mappum, jbenet, NeatBasis, forrestv, dasource, richardus, wumpus, Krellan, btc___, cfields, (+1 more, use /NETSPLIT to show all of them)22:53
-!- btcdrak_ is now known as btcdrak22:54
-!- dasource_ is now known as dasource22:55
-!- mappum_ is now known as mappum22:55
-!- btc____ is now known as btc___22:56
-!- jbenet_ is now known as jbenet22:57
-!- Netsplit over, joins: Krellan22:59
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:01
-!- forrestv [forrestv@unaffiliated/forrestv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:01
-!- thufir [~jircii@unaffiliated/thufir] has left #bitcoin-wizards []23:04
-!- sofdg2 [~sofdg2@unaffiliated/sofdg2] has quit [Quit: Saindo]23:20
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@83.66.118.141] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:27
-!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:30
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]23:36
-!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:38
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:51
-!- blackwraith [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:52
-!- b_lumenkraft [~b_lumenkr@unaffiliated/b-lumenkraft/x-4457406] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:54
-!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]23:54
--- Log closed Sun Apr 12 00:00:50 2015

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!