2015-08-25.log

--- Log opened Tue Aug 25 00:00:51 2015
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:06
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]00:13
-!- dc17523be3 [unknown@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-rhdlalfizsperhwj] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]00:15
-!- p15 [~p15@111.193.191.151] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:25
-!- p15 [~p15@111.193.191.151] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]00:26
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:29
-!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-185-201-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]00:31
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]00:33
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.100] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:34
-!- dc17523be3 [unknown@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-mgldsjhafjqdpzhr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:39
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:49
-!- ishahnaz [~null@unaffiliated/ishahnaz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:54
-!- ishahnaz [~null@unaffiliated/ishahnaz] has quit [Client Quit]00:54
-!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:26
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]01:33
-!- Naphex [~naphex@unaffiliated/naphex] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:36
-!- tromp__ [~tromp@rtc35-240.rentec.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:37
-!- tromp_ [~tromp@rtc35-240.rentec.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]01:39
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:58
-!- p15_ [~p15@111.193.191.151] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:13
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.100] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:15
-!- c0rw|zZz is now known as c0rw1n02:17
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:24
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:30
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:31
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has quit [Client Quit]02:32
-!- gill3s [~textual@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:33
-!- gill3s [~textual@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has quit [Client Quit]02:34
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:34
-!- mkarrer_ [~mkarrer@19.Red-81-44-6.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:38
-!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@19.Red-81-44-6.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]02:38
-!- b-itcoinssg [uid41629@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-miqdgwcefdnuvmka] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:39
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:40
-!- sparetire_ [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:44
-!- dc17523be3 [unknown@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-mgldsjhafjqdpzhr] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]02:52
-!- dc17523be3 [unknown@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-jerumvzraciuecol] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:53
-!- gmaxwell [greg@wikimedia/KatWalsh/x-0001] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:56
gmaxwellhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3iazge/multisig_on_steroids_using_tree_signature/02:56
gmaxwellIf a link to that hasn't already been shared.02:56
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]03:06
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f11db5b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:07
-!- CodeShark_ [~CodeShark@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:25
-!- metamarc [~cypher@unaffiliated/agorist000] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]03:28
-!- metamarc [~cypher@unaffiliated/agorist000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:28
-!- bedeho [~bedeho@50-202-37-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]03:43
-!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:45
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]04:05
-!- kang_ [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:12
-!- p15x_ [~p15x@111.193.191.151] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]04:16
-!- p15x [~p15x@64.145.91.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:17
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:19
-!- King_Rex [~King_Rex@37.sub-70-193-103.myvzw.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:21
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:22
-!- jgarzik [~jgarzik@unaffiliated/jgarzik] has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]04:22
-!- SDCDev [~quassel@unaffiliated/sdcdev] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:29
-!- drwin [~drwin@out-nat-33.jes.cz] has quit [Read error: No route to host]04:34
-!- drwin [~drwin@out-nat-33.jes.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:35
-!- jgarzik [~jgarzik@unaffiliated/jgarzik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:37
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:40
-!- kang_ [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]04:41
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]04:55
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Quit: Leaving]05:00
-!- kang_ [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:01
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EB313.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]05:06
-!- p15_ [~p15@111.193.191.151] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]05:13
-!- vmatekol_ [~vmatekole@p5DDBAF61.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:23
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@76-255-129-88.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:24
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]05:27
-!- CodeShark_ [~CodeShark@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]05:29
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:39
kanzure"Due to script’s operation count limitations, this approach works in theory up to a 1-of-4,294,967,296 multisig, although the tree becomes annoyingly large to construct at that point. Up to 1-of-1,000,000 should be doable, though."05:44
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]06:04
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]06:09
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]06:13
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:13
-!- ASTP001 [~ASTP001@50-78-139-78-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:31
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.56] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:33
-!- AlphaTech [AlphaTech@unaffiliated/alphatech] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]06:35
-!- copumpkin [~copumpkin@unaffiliated/copumpkin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:36
-!- AlphaTech [AlphaTech@super.programmer.port0.org] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:38
-!- p15x_ [~p15x@64.145.91.70] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:40
-!- p15x [~p15x@64.145.91.38] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]06:40
-!- AlphaTech [AlphaTech@super.programmer.port0.org] has quit [Changing host]06:41
-!- AlphaTech [AlphaTech@unaffiliated/alphatech] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:41
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:21
-!- snthsnth [~snthsnth@c-98-207-208-241.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]07:26
-!- binaryatrocity_ [~quassel@69.85.87.117] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:33
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.56] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]07:33
-!- binaryatrocity_ is now known as binaryatrocity07:34
-!- binaryatrocity [~quassel@69.85.87.117] has quit [Changing host]07:34
-!- binaryatrocity [~quassel@unaffiliated/br4n] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:34
-!- hearn [~mike@77-59-53-131.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:35
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f11db5b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]07:36
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:39
-!- kang_ [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]07:45
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]07:46
-!- kang_ [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:54
-!- kang_ [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has quit [Quit: Page closed]08:06
-!- p15x [~p15x@61.149.246.157] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:07
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:08
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]08:08
-!- p15x_ [~p15x@64.145.91.70] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]08:08
-!- hearn [~mike@77-59-53-131.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]08:12
-!- hearn [~mike@77-59-53-131.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:12
-!- zooko [~user@67.51.227.94] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:14
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@c-73-202-109-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:14
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:18
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]08:19
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:38
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]08:46
-!- hearn [~mike@77-59-53-131.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]08:50
-!- hearn_ [~mike@77-59-53-131.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:50
-!- [kerneloops] [~Tee@cpe-76-174-180-4.socal.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:52
-!- hearn_ is now known as hearn08:58
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:59
-!- p15x [~p15x@61.149.246.157] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]09:03
-!- p15x [~p15x@61.149.246.157] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:05
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:09
-!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-185-201-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:12
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]09:13
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@c-73-202-109-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: leaving]09:16
-!- hearn [~mike@77-59-53-131.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]09:17
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:17
-!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]09:20
-!- hearn [~mike@79.108.199.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:23
-!- ASTP001 [~ASTP001@50-78-139-78-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]09:24
-!- [kerneloops] [~Tee@cpe-76-174-180-4.socal.res.rr.com] has left #bitcoin-wizards ["Buh-byes"]09:31
-!- zooko [~user@67.51.227.94] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]09:34
-!- zooko [~user@67.51.227.94] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:36
runeksIs there any form of ordering for the transactions in a block? I mean, can a transaction later in the list of transactions be redeemed by a transaction earlier in the list? I assume so, but I want to know.09:46
runeksI'm talking within a single block.09:46
TaekThat's a #bitcoin-dev (maybe even #bitcoin) question09:49
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]10:07
-!- antgreen [~user@184.151.178.17] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:19
-!- ASTP001 [~ASTP001@50-78-139-78-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:19
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:23
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:28
-!- chester` [~GERwhitey@c-66-229-113-117.hsd1.fl.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:29
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:38
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:44
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@74-95-207-205-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:46
-!- bedeho [~bedeho@50-202-37-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:47
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:51
runeksOk10:51
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:56
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:56
-!- sturles [~sturles@unaffiliated/sturles] has quit [Quit: Rebooting server..]10:57
-!- zooko [~user@67.51.227.94] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]11:02
-!- hearn [~mike@79.108.199.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]11:08
-!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]11:08
-!- Starduster_ [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:11
-!- coryfields_ [~quassel@2001:4802:7800:1:6fc4:c486:ff20:1fa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:13
-!- Starduster [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:14
-!- Luke-Jr [~luke-jr@unaffiliated/luke-jr] has quit [Excess Flood]11:14
-!- coryfields [~quassel@2001:4802:7800:1:6fc4:c486:ff20:1fa] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]11:14
-!- Luke-Jr [~luke-jr@unaffiliated/luke-jr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:14
-!- prosodyContext is now known as misalias11:15
-!- NLNico [~NLNico@unaffiliated/nlnico] has quit [Quit: Leaving]11:15
-!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@186.79-67-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]11:19
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@dhcp-18-189-25-152.dyn.mit.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:20
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-165-121.dsl.scarlet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:23
-!- ASTP001 [~ASTP001@50-78-139-78-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]11:23
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@104-6-36-162.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:29
gmaxwellruneks: the block creates a total order, and no a later transaction cannot be redeemed by an earlier one.11:35
gmaxwell(and taek was right about #bitcoin :) )11:35
runeksgmaxwell: thanks. Gmaxwell has spoken, and I know consider the matter settled :)11:38
runeks*now11:39
gmaxwell(this prevens having forcing the verifier to sort the transactions, or having cycles, etc.)11:39
runeksYeah it totally makes sense. Forced intra-block ordering by txid would also make sense. Respecting redemption order, of course.11:42
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@dhcp-18-189-25-152.dyn.mit.edu] has quit [Quit: GGuyZ]11:42
nwilcoxruneks: When you say forcing ordering by txid (also constrained by redemption order), are you imagining a canonicalization that strives to ensure a given set of txns can only be encoded one way into a valid block?11:44
runeksnwilcox: I guess so, yes.11:44
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@dhcp-18-189-25-152.dyn.mit.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:50
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@dhcp-18-189-25-152.dyn.mit.edu] has quit [Quit: GGuyZ]11:55
-!- zooko [~user@c-73-217-16-2.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:57
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:59
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@dhcp-18-189-25-152.dyn.mit.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:03
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@dhcp-18-189-25-152.dyn.mit.edu] has quit [Client Quit]12:06
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:09
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EB313.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:10
-!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@186.79-67-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:22
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@74-95-207-205-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]12:23
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EB313.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]12:28
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has left #bitcoin-wizards []12:28
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]12:30
-!- fuc [~fuc@179.43.174.162] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:51
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]12:52
-!- fuc is now known as mrhodl12:54
-!- zooko [~user@c-73-217-16-2.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]12:56
-!- CodeShark_ [~androirc@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:57
-!- mrhodl is now known as MrHodl12:57
-!- CodeShark [~androirc@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]12:59
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@104-6-36-162.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]13:13
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@104-6-36-162.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:17
-!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:18
-!- chester` [~GERwhitey@c-66-229-113-117.hsd1.fl.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]13:20
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has quit [Quit: Leaving]13:23
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@104-6-36-162.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]13:26
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@104-6-36-162.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:27
-!- K1NGREX [~King_Rex@37.sub-70-193-103.myvzw.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:30
-!- King_Rex [~King_Rex@37.sub-70-193-103.myvzw.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]13:32
-!- zooko [~user@c-73-217-16-2.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:34
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:39
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:40
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.133] has quit [Excess Flood]13:42
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.133] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:42
kanzurevoting simulation visualizations http://zesty.ca/voting/sim/13:45
-!- chester` [~GERwhitey@c-66-229-113-117.hsd1.fl.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:45
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:47
zookoclear13:47
zookowhoops13:47
zookoThat could've been worse.13:48
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:58
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@99-121-56-190.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:00
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:01
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:09
gmaxwellkanzure: have you seen the voting power analysis tools/page?14:10
gmaxwellkanzure: http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~ecaae/14:10
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f11db5b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:10
gmaxwellwrt those visulizations, they only work for a small number of dimensions, and there are many voting systems where you can't get the really interesting cases with only a few dimenisons. (e.g. need at least 5 candidates and 11 voters to form a preference cycle in some cases.14:11
gmaxwellpretty cool though.14:12
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EB313.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:14
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]14:15
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:16
-!- antgreen [~user@184.151.178.17] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]14:21
-!- b-itcoinssg [uid41629@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-miqdgwcefdnuvmka] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]14:49
-!- MrHodl [~fuc@179.43.174.162] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]14:49
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:57
-!- isis [~isis@abulafia.patternsinthevoid.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]15:04
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]15:04
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-165-121.dsl.scarlet.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:06
-!- bigreddmachine [~bigreddma@ccardhcp-248.colorado.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:06
-!- MrHodl [~fuc@179.43.176.98] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:08
-!- MrHodl [~fuc@179.43.176.98] has quit [Client Quit]15:08
-!- p15x [~p15x@61.149.246.157] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]15:13
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-123-91.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:18
-!- p15x [~p15x@61.149.246.157] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:20
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has quit [Quit: Leaving]15:23
-!- jtimon [~quassel@c-24-4-96-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:24
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]15:31
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:31
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Quit: Leaving]15:34
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:35
-!- zooko [~user@c-73-217-16-2.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]15:37
-!- CodeShark_ [~androirc@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]15:38
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.70] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:40
-!- kangkang [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:43
-!- kangkang [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has left #bitcoin-wizards []15:43
-!- kangkang [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:43
-!- kangkang [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has left #bitcoin-wizards []15:44
-!- kang_ [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:44
kanzuregmaxwell: if anything it just screams "voting is weird don't do it" to me :-/15:48
Adlailast question from tonight's panel (on the whos whys and wtfs of the silverware drama) was indeed about governance... too bad screaming from the back row "mining incentives are all the governance you'll ever need" would've been a tad impolite15:49
gmaxwellkanzure: yea, blame the brainwashing in modern democracies. "Voting" (as if there was only one kind) is presentual as an unblemished univeral solution to common decision problems. People do so fully aware of the many limitations, because voting has good social satability properties (it has a very high ratio of actual disenfranchisement to feeling of power)15:51
-!- snthsnth [~snthsnth@c-98-207-208-241.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:51
kanzurewouldn't it be more useful to have people obsessed with ballot creation more than they are obsessed with voting?15:53
gmaxwellPeople are concerned with that. They're also concerned with control of the voter rolls.15:54
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]15:55
Adlaithat's not fair, some people are better at ballot creation (cleaner/faster handwriting?) than others15:55
Adlaigetting fairness out of the way makes the problem much easier, because it absolves the need for democracy theater15:55
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]16:01
kang_Democratic voting is broken in that sense. On a free knowledge forum, 'to the moon' memes are sure to get more votes than some in-depth posts due to the span of direct individual influence. But in a ballot, each upvote is money. This can be solved to an extent by weighted importance of votes. Like each science subreddit vote should get more importance than justin bieber subreddit vote, but now the problem is who decides what16:02
Adlaikang_: how do you allocate potential-upvotes... IPs? cookies? PGP WoT?Hashcash? bitcoin burning? birth certificates?16:04
gmaxwellkang_: yes, thats been a principle in some of the closed loop control proposals-- that any 'vote' should have a cost.16:04
kang_For now people are considering miner's votes as real important, whereas their rationality, aligned by inbuilt economic incentive, is in the near long-term. Miner dont care if bitcoin dies after 2 years.16:04
gmaxwellUnfrotunately giving things a cost also means that money is power. :(16:04
Adlaiminers still care that they'll be able to sell their vote-receipts16:04
Adlaithis requires bitcoin to maintain value for at least a few... hours?16:05
* Adlai suddenly realizes why coinbases should not be spendable right away16:05
belcherlong enough to amortize their equipment16:05
Adlaiinb4 coinbase spendability hardfork >_<16:06
c0rw1num they need to cash out and not crash the rate while doing it16:06
Adlaic0rw1n: yes, "bitcoin to maintain value" is a statement about market liquidity16:06
kang_gmaxwell: I am not talking about cost to voting in proportion to importance of voter, but in proportion to cost of importance of the subject.16:07
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:08
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vsyprvrptiwlcrhf] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:09
gmaxwellkang_: one problem is that if you make voting more expensive you exacerbate power imbalances (especially when the vote is over a source of that imbalance), and you also discourage the participation from people without a vested monetary interest.16:10
gmaxwellFor example if the vote is to build a coal power plant vs not and have clean, enjoyable air... there is a lot of money behind one side, and the other side is people's hard to value well being, and people who are not as powerful.16:11
gmaxwellIs it right to give the power company more access to the vote?16:11
* Adlai has yet to see an electorate not as expensive as the buyer is willing to pay16:11
kang_The constitution(satoshi's implementation) is becoming more important than the priciples of the country(satoshi's principle(debatable)).16:12
-!- drwin [~drwin@out-nat-33.jes.cz] has quit [Read error: No route to host]16:12
-!- drwin [~drwin@out-nat-33.jes.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:13
Adlaicalling the satoshi client a 'constitution' implies that people still read it...16:13
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:15
gmaxwellA constutution only has power to the extent that it gets read and understood; there is no tidy comparison. The Bitcoin rules are somewhere between an informal agreement and a law of nature.16:15
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EB313.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]16:15
gmaxwellThey're self-enforcing in a way that a constution isn't; but only if people are running nodes of some kind.16:15
kang_No I am calling '10 minutes' etc parameters as the constitution. Transaction throughput rate is number of blocks per unit time. Can be increased by 1. larger blocks, 2. faster time, 3. Abstraction of transactions. Since 2 is constitution and 3 looks like conflict of interest, for eg sidechains, people think that 1 is the only way16:16
kang_Why is 10 minutes - the parameter more sacred than blocksize the parameter?16:18
Adlaibitcoin's constitution is self-enforcing only to the extend that the effecting network values self-enforcement16:19
gmaxwellNo one is going around saying that changing the interblock expected gap will increase the price of bitcoin.16:21
phantomcircuitgmaxwell, im sure there is some fool doing that :/16:22
kang_Changing the interblock time will increase the number of transactions accommodated. Point is both parameters are equally sacred. Also, equally important to the algorithm theoretically. Shorter block time means more forks but larger block times mean a headstart to the miner.16:24
kanzure"sacred"16:24
nwilcoxCan anyone recommend an analysis of the issues around turning down interblock target time?16:24
nwilcoxI'm mainly interested in orphan rate or vulnerabilities to attacks, and less so in the fact that this changes the realtime rate of monetary base growth...16:25
kang_:) Sacred because touching '10 minutes' is a big no but we assume we are free to play with blocksize, as if it was less imp in the protocol.16:25
kanzurepropagation rate, orphaned blocks, various synchronization issues16:25
gmaxwellnwilcox: it increases the base cost for light clients, and below some critical threshold (a multiple of network radius) the network just stops converging (expected reorg length tends to infinity).  I don't have a nice closed form analysis but if you run a numerical simulation you see this.16:26
kanzurealso the best reference is probably old -wizard logs16:26
gmaxwell10 minutes isn't magic, and maybe 5 minutes would be just as good(?-- esp if scaling blocksize down to match) but below some point the system will go off the rails. In the real world the network radius isn't constant or easily measurable, so its reasonable to be pretty cautious.16:27
gmaxwellThere is the ghost paper (and its follow up the original had more problems) that improves the behavior, though at the cost of greatly amplifying selfish mining.16:27
gmaxwellprobably the ghost paper is some of the better general analysis, though they ignore a lot of interesting issues (like incentives problems!) and mostly just focus on the system achieving convergence at all.16:28
nwilcoxgmaxwell, kanzure: Thanks.16:28
Adlaikang_: sacredness is in the eye of the worshipper. some parametrs (eg potential M0) are much more easily worshipped than others... the effecting network has edges, and you want maximal agreement on altar shape, for maximal network strength16:29
kanzureAdlai: i recommend tabooing the word "sacred" and "altar". it's not a word that conveys much signal.16:29
nwilcoxSo there's some lower bound region on time that leads to a qualitative state change (eg: failing to ever converge).16:29
nwilcox-and with block size there's probably also an upper bound range.16:29
gmaxwellI don't think any parameter is actually sacred in the eyes of the users.  There are suicide pact elements to bitcoin, but ultimately it's not a suicide pact.16:29
* Adlai was not the first to introduce nuclear vocabulary to the region16:29
kang_Exactly, so both the parameters should esentially let be and rather everyone should try to think how to abstract the transactions so that more can be accommodated in the current shape. One way of abstraction is definitely sidechains, where multiple transactions are abstracted to 2 tx on bitcoin block16:29
nwilcoxIt's interesting that turning up block size doesn't immediately impact SPV client costs, right?16:30
Adlainwilcox: assuming a sufficiently-implemented SPV client, sure. but de facto, it increases response time to getutxo and its equivalents16:31
gmaxwellLets imagine the most 'sacred' parameter, the supply of coins.  Now imagine a future 25 years from now where subsidy is very low, and TX fees are not picking up the slack (e.g. fee market has failed or is insufficient) and the security of the system is failing, the network is being reorged by byzantine attackers with generation old hashpower. Security and usability are evaporating. Something must16:31
gmaxwell be done.16:31
gmaxwellWith bitcoin's utility failing, saying you now need to pay fees when you haven't the last 10 years may not be a credible argument.16:31
gmaxwellSo what do you do?16:31
gmaxwellDo you introduce signed blocks?16:32
gmaxwellSomething else that no one has invented yet?16:32
Adlaiwait for more confirmations?16:32
Adlaiie, slow down your own use of the network, without changing its basic function16:32
gmaxwellAdlai: if they have a localized majority no amount of wait is safe.16:32
gmaxwellYou could wait 100 blocks and poof. reorged.16:32
gmaxwellor they could constantly reorg the tip so you make no progress.16:32
Adlaiguess #2: switch PoW, preferably to one that doubles as utxo queries16:33
gmaxwellThere is no promise that these attacks will be expensive-- we see altcoins attacked like this all the time today.16:33
Adlaiutxo queries cost, uh, something!16:33
gmaxwellAdlai: but end up with the same situation because the fundimentals haven't changed.16:33
nwilcoxGotta run, but wish I could keep lurking...16:33
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@99-121-56-190.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Quit: leaving]16:33
kanzurenwilcox == iwilcox?16:34
gmaxwellAnother option is to implement 0.1% inflation to subsidize security ongoing. This is a tax on coins at rest, maybe even lost coins.16:34
kanzurebeen confused about this16:34
gmaxwellkanzure: no.16:34
kanzureah! interesting.16:34
kanzurethis might explain a few things....16:34
Adlaianother possibility is that by the time this happens, "bitcoin-og" will have lost market share due to negative feedback of lost market share and lost PoW-share...16:35
Adlaiie, for the benefit of a wholly distinct consensus network16:35
gmaxwellAdlai: and if not for the inability to actually achieve a true fixed rate, I would have even argued that it would have been a good initial parameter of the system.16:35
kang_Ya I had read about this on your alt-ideas page16:36
Adlaiso this becomes a question of "should consensus networks doubling as censorship-free broadcast networks tripling as settlement layers incentivize scroogeiness?"16:36
Adlaibecause once you have any nonzero protocol inflation, you have nonzero spending incentive16:36
kanzureperhaps lightning fees could be used to fund mining in that hypothetical miners-all-died-yo scenario16:37
* Adlai suspects the best we can do, today, is "insufficient data for meaningful answer"16:37
kanzure(for rebootstrapping)16:37
* Adlai waits for the day when half the opportunity cost of mining is covered by running a channel rebalancer16:38
Adlai(with breath unbaited)16:38
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.70] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]16:40
kang_Just after 4-5 halvenings the network would be producing 0.78 coins per block. Whatever situation you are imagining in 25 years w.r.t mining hashrate, will happen much before that. The market will take care of itself to either adjust the price so that those coins remain of same or more "value" as 25 coins of today OR the market kills the price totally, which requires political initiative to happen because raational spenders 16:47
* Adlai waits for the arrival of once-we-fork multipools for sha256d, breath *baited*16:48
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:49
Adlaithe beautiful thing about which is plausible deniability for violent fork-triggering. "we only wanted to test on production!"16:49
-!- bigreddmachine [~bigreddma@ccardhcp-248.colorado.edu] has quit []16:50
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]16:55
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:04
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.70] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:04
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]17:05
* Adlai floats a hypothesis: the only way blocksize can increase (noncoercively) is for a miner with sufficient profit margins to willingly produce larger-than-consensus orphans as an unfakable vote17:10
Adlaithis is only +EV when the transaction backlog pushes fees to the point where a couple dozen orphans are worth the future payoff from raising the consensus size limit17:11
phantomcircuitAdlai, that's sort of like the suggestion for flexcap17:13
rustyAdlai: that would seem to have the classic logjam properties that I do the work, we all benefit.17:13
phantomcircuitwhich is, to produce a larger block you need to commit to producing a block with a lower target (ie harder to produce)17:13
-!- jtimon [~quassel@c-24-4-96-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:13
Adlaiphantomcircuit: oh, i like that one17:13
phantomcircuitif you do that you can produce a larger block than the current limit17:13
phantomcircuitthat part is actually really easy to implement17:14
Adlaiimplement, sure. mine on it with hard-earned hardware? let's wait and see...17:14
phantomcircuitbut then you want to do things like have the limit be the average of the previous 2016 blocks or something so that they dont have to always do that17:14
phantomcircuitwhich gets expensive rapidly17:14
-!- hazirafel [~hazirafel@31.154.92.150] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:15
Adlai... why? why not let game theory develop a practical counterpart?17:15
phantomcircuitAdlai, you cant do a linear trade off otherwise someone with 1% of the mining power sets their target 1000x and waits to get lucky with a block that crashes the entire network17:16
Adlaiphantomcircuit: who cares if one miner gets "lucky"?17:17
* Adlai wants to see a retargetwindow'sworth of orphaned blocks before raising his defaults17:17
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:18
hazirafelnovv\\\\\\\bb17:18
hazirafelsorry.17:18
hazirafelvv17:18
hazirafellol17:18
Adlaiwelcome to #b-w.17:19
hazirafelyay for everyone17:19
* Adlai appends his jacktheripper db17:19
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@104-6-36-162.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Quit: leaving for a bit]17:19
hazirafeldon't kill me for being a bear price concerened  bitcoiner . who's gonna pay for shit?17:20
-!- snthsnth [~snthsnth@c-98-207-208-241.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]17:23
-!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving]17:25
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]17:31
-!- veleiro [~veleiro@fsf/member/veleiro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:33
-!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8301:e87f:d800:8a24:ee6d:98a0] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:37
dgenr8kang_: satoshi's design is that bitcoin becomes more valuable to offset the gradual lost subsidy.17:44
dgenr8kang_: the main way to help it become more valuable is to help it be more widely used17:44
rustydgenr8: no, his suggestion in the original whitepaper was that fees offset subsidy.17:44
rustydgenr8: otherwise the subsidy wouldn't go to zero.17:45
veleirowho cares what satoshi thinks, think for yourself! do you want a global payments system, or do you want an uncensorable currency?17:48
veleirowhat takes place over everything else?17:49
c0rw1nuncensorable global payment currency system ?17:56
veleiroc0rw1n: haha, but you have to ask yourself, which of those are you willing to give up in place of the other?17:57
c0rw1nif it's uncensorable nothing prevents it from being global17:57
c0rw1nso that takes precedence17:57
rustyveleiro: the expectations of users are important, and so it's worth correcting misinterpretations when that's involved.17:59
veleirorusty: what misinterpretations do you mean?18:00
rustyveleiro: dgenr8's comment I was replying to, which you were indirectly replying to.18:01
-!- snthsnth [~snthsnth@c-98-207-208-241.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:02
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.70] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]18:04
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]18:05
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]18:06
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:06
-!- snthsnth [~snthsnth@c-98-207-208-241.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]18:09
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-123-91.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: GGuyZ]18:10
-!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8301:e87f:d800:8a24:ee6d:98a0] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]18:12
-!- sparetire_ [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has quit [Quit: sparetire_]18:13
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:35
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.70] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:35
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]18:36
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:38
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@x4d08a2b9.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]18:38
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vsyprvrptiwlcrhf] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]18:42
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]18:42
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:53
-!- PRab [~chatzilla@2601:40a:8000:8f9b:4dcd:e89:4b5d:3e87] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]18:56
-!- PRab [~chatzilla@2601:40a:8000:8f9b:4dcd:e89:4b5d:3e87] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:58
-!- NLNico [~NLNico@unaffiliated/nlnico] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:08
-!- ebfull [~ebfull@73.34.119.0] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]19:09
-!- hazirafel [~hazirafel@31.154.92.150] has quit [Quit: Leaving]19:10
-!- kang_ [67efea65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.103.239.234.101] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]19:10
-!- ebfull [~ebfull@73.34.119.0] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:12
livegnikSerious question: Whatever happened to Satoshi's proposed solution for solving Bitcoin's block size limit issue that lay ahead? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1347.msg15366#msg1536619:12
livegnikI assume this has probably been discussed. Can anyone here provide me with a link / some thoughts on it?19:13
Adlailivegnik: what kind of pathetic excuse for a solution is that19:13
-!- snthsnth [~snthsnth@c-98-207-208-241.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:13
Adlaii mean, what kind of pathetic attempt at appeal to authoritarianist excuse for a solution is that19:13
livegnikI don't know, you tell me.19:14
Adlaiok, here's a rough tough off-the-cuff attempt: the economic supermajority of bitcoin ownership has implicitly asserted its acceptance of 1mb-blocksize-bitcoin-economics, and it would violate that social contract to implement the offhand sillyness espoused in that link19:17
livegnikI was thinking that maybe it could be combined with some sort of a curve that gradually grows along with Moore's law, but I'm not much of a coder and couldn't get my question answered elsewhere, therefore I'm coming to you with this.19:18
Adlai"coming to you" would be /msg, this is coming to an entire irc channel. try #bitcoin or pm.19:18
livegnikAh. The consensus regarding the social contract. Thank you.19:18
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f11db5b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]19:21
-!- K1NGREX [~King_Rex@37.sub-70-193-103.myvzw.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:30
-!- veleiro [~veleiro@fsf/member/veleiro] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]19:30
-!- veleiro [~veleiro@fsf/member/veleiro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:32
-!- King_Rex [~King_Rex@37.sub-70-193-103.myvzw.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:37
-!- p15_ [~p15@61.149.246.157] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:37
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.70] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]19:40
-!- King_Rex [~King_Rex@37.sub-70-193-103.myvzw.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:41
-!- copumpkin [~copumpkin@unaffiliated/copumpkin] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]19:49
-!- c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|zZz19:51
dgenr8rusty: no worries there.  today's fees are already more than the subsidy will be in 2040, with another hundred years to go19:54
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:57
kanzureAdlai: i think you can make arguments much stronger than those about "social contracts"20:17
Adlaigo on20:17
kanzurewell, quite trivially, that moore's law is not a law20:21
kanzureno need to resort to social contract handwavium20:21
-!- vmatekol_ [~vmatekole@p5DDBAF61.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]20:24
-!- [7] [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Disconnected by services]20:24
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:25
* Adlai mutters something about the "social 'contract'"20:25
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:26
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]20:30
moa'social contract' conjures up imagery of 'socially contracted ...." malaise of one type or another20:37
-!- luke-jr_ [~luke-jr@unaffiliated/luke-jr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:40
-!- Luke-Jr [~luke-jr@unaffiliated/luke-jr] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]20:40
-!- luke-jr_ is now known as Luke-Jr20:48
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-123-91.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:56
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.133] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]21:06
-!- BitName [~user@71-90-215-93.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]21:06
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.23.142] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:08
-!- p15x [~p15x@61.149.246.157] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]21:33
-!- p15x [~p15x@61.149.246.157] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:34
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-123-91.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: GGuyZ]21:46
-!- kisspunch [~za3k@deadtree.xen.prgmr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]22:00
-!- kisspunch [~za3k@deadtree.xen.prgmr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:01
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:13
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:14
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]22:19
-!- NLNico [~NLNico@unaffiliated/nlnico] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]22:37
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:52
-!- TheDarkLord [~thedarklo@ip-81-11-160-158.dsl.scarlet.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]22:52
-!- NLNico [~NLNico@unaffiliated/nlnico] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:54
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EB313.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:04
-!- xabbix [~xabbix@unaffiliated/xabbix] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]23:14
-!- p15_ [~p15@61.149.246.157] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]23:22
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]23:27
-!- Casper- [~Casper@linux-cryptofree2-a.xn--cdaan2d.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:43
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Quit: Leaving]23:56
--- Log closed Wed Aug 26 00:00:52 2015

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!