--- Log opened Wed Jan 30 00:00:37 2019 01:52 < t0mix> when I use "lightning-cli pay ", does c-lightning check for case when I have channel open directly with payee? it takes several seconds to make payment even with channel opened directly. I'm searching for bottleneck. (I run Raspberry Pi 2, 1GB RAM, 5400rpm HDD via USB) 02:03 -!- kexkey [~kexkey@172.98.82.4] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 02:21 -!- spinza [~spin@155.93.246.187] has quit [Quit: Coyote finally caught up with me...] 02:25 -!- spinza [~spin@155.93.246.187] has joined #c-lightning 03:27 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 03:28 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has joined #c-lightning 03:50 -!- spinza [~spin@155.93.246.187] has quit [Quit: Coyote finally caught up with me...] 03:59 -!- spinza [~spin@155.93.246.187] has joined #c-lightning 05:57 -!- bitonic-cjp [~bitonic-c@92-111-70-106.static.v4.ziggozakelijk.nl] has joined #c-lightning 06:16 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has quit [Quit: = ""] 06:59 -!- spaced0ut [~spaced0ut@unaffiliated/spaced0ut] has joined #c-lightning 08:09 < blockstream_bot> [Christian Decker, Blockstream] It used to randomize the route even in those cases. That should no longer be the case at least when compiling from `master` 08:14 < t0mix> compiled from https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/archive/v0.6.3.zip 09:13 -!- bitonic-cjp [~bitonic-c@92-111-70-106.static.v4.ziggozakelijk.nl] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 12:08 -!- spaced0ut [~spaced0ut@unaffiliated/spaced0ut] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 13:22 -!- spaced0ut [~spaced0ut@unaffiliated/spaced0ut] has joined #c-lightning 14:13 -!- spinza [~spin@155.93.246.187] has quit [Quit: Coyote finally caught up with me...] 14:39 -!- spinza [~spin@155.93.246.187] has joined #c-lightning 16:07 -!- michaelsdunn1 [~michaelsd@unaffiliated/michaelsdunn1] has joined #c-lightning 16:12 -!- michaelsdunn1 [~michaelsd@unaffiliated/michaelsdunn1] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 16:50 -!- Victorsueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 16:51 -!- Victorsueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has joined #c-lightning 17:33 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 17:33 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has joined #c-lightning 17:56 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 17:57 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has joined #c-lightning 18:04 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 18:04 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has joined #c-lightning 18:12 -!- spinza [~spin@155.93.246.187] has quit [Quit: Coyote finally caught up with me...] 18:22 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 18:22 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has joined #c-lightning 18:36 -!- spinza [~spin@155.93.246.187] has joined #c-lightning 19:21 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 19:22 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has joined #c-lightning 19:26 -!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #c-lightning 19:36 -!- michaelsdunn1 [~michaelsd@unaffiliated/michaelsdunn1] has joined #c-lightning 19:40 -!- michaelsdunn1 [~michaelsd@unaffiliated/michaelsdunn1] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:02 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 20:04 -!- mn3monic [jsz@unaffiliated/mn3monic] has joined #c-lightning 20:38 -!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:48 -!- michaelsdunn1 [~michaelsd@unaffiliated/michaelsdunn1] has joined #c-lightning 20:52 -!- michaelsdunn1 [~michaelsd@unaffiliated/michaelsdunn1] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 21:15 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-evztbxqdurfwpjrm] has left #c-lightning [] 21:15 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-evztbxqdurfwpjrm] has joined #c-lightning 23:36 < t0mix> is there any value added by having more peers connected to my node (without necessarily having channel open with each peer)? or may I even consider it not desired state? --- Log closed Thu Jan 31 00:00:36 2019