--- Log opened Sat Sep 07 00:00:04 2019
00:14 -!- Victor_sueca is now known as Victorsueca
01:08 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-icdpzigfnkmughei] has left #c-lightning []
01:08 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-icdpzigfnkmughei] has joined #c-lightning
01:14 -!- darosior [~darosior@107.175.255.247] has quit [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat]
01:28 -!- queip [~queip@unaffiliated/rezurus] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
01:37 -!- queip [~queip@unaffiliated/rezurus] has joined #c-lightning
01:53 -!- justanotheruser [justanothe@gateway/vpn/nordvpn/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
02:08 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #c-lightning
02:15 -!- justanotheruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #c-lightning
02:49 -!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #c-lightning
02:57 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-icdpzigfnkmughei] has left #c-lightning []
02:57 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-icdpzigfnkmughei] has joined #c-lightning
03:30 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
03:43 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #c-lightning
03:49 -!- reallll [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #c-lightning
03:51 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
04:16 -!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
04:52 -!- vincenzopalazzo [~vincenzop@host137-162-dynamic.245-95-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #c-lightning
07:50 -!- darosior [5ba5be47@91-165-190-71.subs.proxad.net] has joined #c-lightning
07:55 < darosior> If we send 2 `commitment_signed` messages before receiving a `revoke_and_ack`, would it be fatal for the channel if the peer receives the second one before(/instead of) the first one ?
08:09 -!- reallll is now known as belcher
09:53 < vincenzopalazzo> hello Guys I have another question on the rpc request, I have an problem with the command txprepare with the outputs. My question is, how c-lightning want the list output? I have try this request https://pastebin.com/H6QpMxsy but I have this error https://pastebin.com/R9DCwaUx
10:24 < darosior> I'm not sure `txprepare` take any output parameter
10:25 < darosior> Actually that's what the error states
10:25 < darosior> `man lightning-txprepare` ;-)
10:28 < vincenzopalazzo> Yes, but how I declare to the request the array the outputs? without the propriety?
10:28 < vincenzopalazzo> key not propriety, sorry
10:39 < darosior> You dont need to pass outputs to this command
10:41 < darosior> But for `fundchannel`, for example, which can take outputs as the last (iirc) argument, I think that's the good way
10:43 < vincenzopalazzo> Sorry I don't understand, the command have need the array of outputs, so the prototype outputs is this "[{address1: amount1}, {address2: amount2}]", right? 
10:43 < darosior> No
10:44 < darosior> What method are you trying to call through RPC ?
10:44 < vincenzopalazzo> I want call the txprepare
10:45 < darosior> Then dont specify an `output` parameter
10:47 < darosior> This not an argument for that command : you should read the `man lightning-txprepare` https://lightning.readthedocs.io/lightning-txprepare.7.html
10:47 < darosior> Oh sorry
10:47 < darosior> My bad
10:48 < darosior> Once again I've read too quickly...
10:49 < vincenzopalazzo> this is a correct request https://pastebin.com/hEq5pDj0?
10:50 < darosior> I did not have https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/pull/2964 locally
10:55 < vincenzopalazzo> So, this command is new inside the #c-lightning and this not is inside the official release?
10:55 < vincenzopalazzo> with another work, the my request is correct? :)
10:56 < darosior> Yeah it has just been merged 2 days ago
10:57 < darosior> Before this there was no "outputs" parameters
10:58 < darosior> txprepare destination satoshi [feerate] [minconf]
10:58 < darosior> for v0.7.2.1
10:58 < vincenzopalazzo> I have this version, right? def txprepare(self, destination, satoshi, feerate=None, minconf=None):
10:58 < darosior> yes
10:58 < darosior> the destination is an address
10:59 < vincenzopalazzo> So, If I create the new java wrapper, I must include this version?
10:59 < darosior> i.e. for your wrapper you need to make a call like `{ "destination": "a_bitcoin_address", "satoshi": x}`
10:59 < darosior> With `x` how many the tx sends
11:00 < darosior> I dont know, maybe you should be backward compatible xD
11:00 < darosior> If you had to choose, I'd say to go with the next release
11:01 < darosior> v0.7.3
11:01 < darosior> Which will include the `outputs` argument
11:02 < vincenzopalazzo> keep the code pending :) thanks
11:14 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-icdpzigfnkmughei] has left #c-lightning []
11:14 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-icdpzigfnkmughei] has joined #c-lightning
11:35 -!- queip [~queip@unaffiliated/rezurus] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
11:46 -!- queip [~queip@unaffiliated/rezurus] has joined #c-lightning
11:49 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: queip
11:53 -!- queip [~queip@unaffiliated/rezurus] has joined #c-lightning
11:57 -!- justanotheruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
12:00 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: queip
12:06 -!- queip [~queip@unaffiliated/rezurus] has joined #c-lightning
12:14 -!- justanotheruser [justanothe@gateway/vpn/nordvpn/justanotheruser] has joined #c-lightning
12:42 -!- jb55 [~jb55@gateway/tor-sasl/jb55] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
12:51 -!- vincenzopalazzo [~vincenzop@host137-162-dynamic.245-95-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
12:53 -!- darosior [5ba5be47@91-165-190-71.subs.proxad.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
12:55 -!- jb55 [~jb55@gateway/tor-sasl/jb55] has joined #c-lightning
15:29 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has joined #c-lightning
15:29 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has quit [Client Quit]
18:12 -!- mdunnio [~mdunnio@208.59.170.5] has joined #c-lightning
18:32 -!- Kostenko [~Kostenko@2001:8a0:728c:7300:5117:6e14:a99e:3d81] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
18:48 -!- mdunnio [~mdunnio@208.59.170.5] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Air has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
19:33 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-icdpzigfnkmughei] has left #c-lightning []
19:33 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-icdpzigfnkmughei] has joined #c-lightning
20:17 -!- mdunnio [~mdunnio@208.59.170.5] has joined #c-lightning
20:38 -!- mdunnio [~mdunnio@208.59.170.5] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
21:31 -!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #c-lightning
21:35 -!- Kostenko [~Kostenko@2001:8a0:728c:7300:5117:6e14:a99e:3d81] has joined #c-lightning
23:34 -!- jb55 [~jb55@gateway/tor-sasl/jb55] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
23:36 -!- jb55 [~jb55@gateway/tor-sasl/jb55] has joined #c-lightning
--- Log closed Sun Sep 08 00:00:05 2019