--- Day changed Sun Jun 08 2008 00:00 < Vedestin> you're going to get kidnapped 00:00 < Vedestin> and held to ransom 00:00 < Vedestin> this is a targetted nigerian scam 00:00 < kanzure> I'm going to be thrown over a bridge, that's what 00:00 < Vedestin> in a carpet? 00:00 < kanzure> no, in a casket 00:01 < Vedestin> this is a confusing burial tradition 00:01 < Vedestin> are you half indian or something? 00:01 < kanzure> no? 00:01 < Vedestin> casket + river 00:01 < kanzure> well, it's the mafia 00:01 < Vedestin> mafia use carpets 00:01 < kanzure> is that so? 00:01 < kanzure> I thought they used bags, and bricks 00:01 < Vedestin> sometimes they use engine blocks and chains 00:01 < kanzure> I see. 00:02 < kanzure> I'll watch out for that. 00:02 < Vedestin> do 00:02 < Vedestin> if the meeting is scheduled at a scrap yard, don't go 00:02 < kanzure> at least there aren't any bridges nearby 00:02 < Vedestin> there might be a car crusher 00:03 < Vedestin> i think russian mafia just shoot you and bury you 00:03 * Vedestin shrugs 00:03 < Vedestin> how do you know they're mafia 00:04 < kanzure> I'm making a joke 00:04 < kanzure> because the Russian government is somehow notoriously linked to their mafia 00:05 < Vedestin> oh, i thought the russian transhumanists were linked to the mafia 00:05 < Vedestin> i thought that was your joke 00:05 < kanzure> no 00:05 < kanzure> well 00:05 < kanzure> they aren't 00:05 < kanzure> but that is the joke, yes 00:05 < kanzure> because anybody Russian has to have mafia ties, righ? 00:05 < kanzure> *right 00:06 < Vedestin> anybody with internet 00:06 < Vedestin> or money 00:22 -!- Splicer [n=p@h87n1c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 00:23 < kanzure> Hey Splicer. 00:23 < kanzure> What happened to Biopunk? 00:24 < Splicer> russian maffia 00:25 < Splicer> were you serious about being contacted by russian tranhumaninsts btw? 00:25 < Splicer> claiming gov ties? 00:26 < kanzure> yes 00:26 < Splicer> hehehehe.. cool 00:28 -!- Vedestin [n=Vedestin@d122-109-35-58.sbr3.nsw.optusnet.com.au] has left #hplusroadmap [] 00:31 < Splicer> I feel a bit sorry for the russians.. they have been through a lot of shit and now it looks like it's beginning again 00:34 -!- Biopunk [n=p@h87n1c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 00:34 -!- Splicer is now known as Biopunk 00:45 < Biopunk> time to sleep... cu 00:45 -!- Biopunk [n=p@h87n1c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has quit [] 01:12 < kanzure> I must be running out of memory. 01:13 < kanzure> Didn't I come up with the idea of abstracting the template way, using template-independence, by transfering diffused 'template ghoster molecules' (of separate triphosphate base structs, for the different polymerases), and then these polymerases would have to select a nucleotide that matches it. 01:13 < kanzure> (hopefully a normal nucleotide) 01:13 < kanzure> therefore I don't need to do selection nonsense 01:48 -!- Vedestin [n=Vedestin@d122-109-35-58.sbr3.nsw.optusnet.com.au] has joined #hplusroadmap 02:03 < ybit> kanzure, you up? 02:03 < kanzure> ybit: yes 02:03 < ybit> you wouldn't happen to have an introductory neurosci ebook would you? :) 02:04 < ybit> if not, i suppose i could print off my textbooks and read them instead while bored at work 02:09 < kanzure> hrm 02:09 < kanzure> yes, I believe I do 02:09 < kanzure> but not right now 02:09 < kanzure> let me get you something better 02:09 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/bookmarks/bookmarks-old2//Biology/Neuroscience/index.html#3.18 02:10 < kanzure> I need sleep. g'night 02:11 < ybit> 'night 08:45 -!- Vedestin [n=Vedestin@d122-109-35-58.sbr3.nsw.optusnet.com.au] has quit ["User pushed the X - because it's Xtra, baby"] 10:05 -!- procto [n=boo@logarchy.org] has joined #hplusroadmap 10:08 < procto> nsh: fancy seeing you here :> 10:12 * nsh victory rolls 11:56 < kanzure> Hey procto. 11:58 < kanzure> procto: We seem to be in agreement re: logarchy.org. 11:58 < kanzure> Ah, I see you're influenced by Max More. 11:59 < kanzure> However, the first one. Governments should not be providing freedoms. They should be building new ways of liberation. 12:20 < procto> hi kanzure 12:21 < procto> perhaps I didn't phrase quite right. i didn't mean them to provide freedoms, but merely assuring them 12:22 < procto> what freedoms exactly? depending which gov'ts subscription service you buy 12:22 < procto> i'll rephrase the sentence 12:23 < procto> I meant more "provide for the maintenance" 12:23 < procto> kanzure: I think that's better articulated on the govt page http://logarchy.org/govt.html 12:24 < procto> good catch :> 12:25 < fenn> maybe you shouldn't even use the word "government" at all 12:25 < fenn> it has a tendency to cause magical thinking 12:26 < fenn> "the government should send a manned mission to mars" 12:26 < fenn> "the government should do something about the economy" 12:26 < kanzure> Hrm, assuring them? 12:26 < procto> agreed. but if I ommitt the word, people who aren't used to that close up immediatly 12:26 < fenn> or that it just springs up out of nowhere on its own 12:27 < fenn> people have to _make_ it happen 12:27 < kanzure> procto: So, let me describe something we talk about in here frequently 12:27 < procto> mumbling something about anarchists 12:27 < kanzure> it's actually one of fenn's uhh 'goals' or whatever 12:27 < kanzure> one of his projects :) 12:27 < kanzure> he wants space habitats so that he can do what he wants 12:27 < kanzure> without other people interferring, and without doing anything naughty to too many others 12:27 < kanzure> So, in the case of the current governments, 12:27 < procto> right 12:27 < kanzure> they're imposing artificial limitations on us really 12:27 < kanzure> since they are giant resource hogs etc. etc. 12:27 < kanzure> and they aren't trying to make it so that we are more 'liberated' 12:28 < kanzure> by liberated I mean in the sense of http://heybryan.org/exp.html 12:28 < kanzure> check out the Gershenfeld quote on there 12:28 * procto has bee inquiring as to the prices of decomissioned tankers and cargo ships and certain aspects of maritame law 12:28 < fenn> the current government feels threatened by civilians with rocket technology, and have imposed laws to prevent the dissemination of knowledge (ITAR) 12:28 < kanzure> sure, decomissioned tech would be an interesting thing to acquire 12:28 < kanzure> so I guess you're versed in micronations 12:28 < kanzure> but micronations (on earth) don't quite solve the problems 12:28 < kanzure> plus, their nations 12:28 < kanzure> *they're 12:29 < procto> agreed 12:29 < procto> but it'll be a starting point 12:29 < procto> it's a seed that's immediately feasible granted funding 12:29 < kanzure> hrm, Max More in Second Life today: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Extropia%20Core/160/58/22/?img=http%3A//translook.com/images/9/97/Extropiacore3s.jpg&title=SL-Transhumanists%20@%20Extropia%20Core&msg=Welcome%20to%20SL-Transhumanists%20@%20Extropia%20Core 12:29 < kanzure> now if only Second Life worked for me 12:29 < fenn> *wank* 12:30 < kanzure> but you know what, I don't know if I'm going to bother with Second Life today 12:30 < procto> I'm perhaps a decade away from the funds required 12:30 < kanzure> procto: What are you working towards? 12:30 < kanzure> fenn: if Max wants me to use SL to hear him talk, that's totally BS 12:30 < kanzure> he should just show up on skype with a chat function or something 12:30 < kanzure> recently they've been wanting me to use web interfaces to listen to 'Mind' speak on justin.tv, 12:30 < procto> well, a logarchy 12:30 < kanzure> or Second Life to do other naughty things 12:30 < kanzure> totally retarded 12:30 < kanzure> we have skype, we have IRC 12:31 < kanzure> and both of those have low overhead 12:31 < kanzure> procto: Why's that? 12:31 < procto> yes 12:31 < fenn> kanzure: there is a point to SL interaction, but it shouldn't be the only information channel 12:31 < fenn> most people say the same thing over and over anyway 12:32 < procto> kanzure: hmm, that's a fairly complicated question. 12:32 < kanzure> "Here are my points: 1, 2, 3. Okay. Any questions?" 12:32 < kanzure> procto: indeed it is 12:32 < fenn> if you need to attend every virtual talk, you may be a fanboy 12:32 < kanzure> but I've taken similar lines of thought before, so if you do a dense text output in an attempt to explain it, I'm sure I can catch on 12:32 < kanzure> fenn: well, supposedly this is a "how to get transhumanism back on track" 12:32 < kanzure> but the fact that it's in Second Life makes me question it 12:32 < kanzure> I mean, Max is a good guy, I've met him, he can be awesome at times 12:32 < kanzure> but this is retarded :( 12:33 < fenn> was it ever 'on track'? 12:33 < procto> kanzure: I wish for myself to be granted certain freedoms, and in order to be self fulfilled, my close family and friends should be covered by those freedoms as well 12:33 < kanzure> I'd argue yes 12:33 < kanzure> fenn: it's what got the Mind Uploading Research Group together 12:33 < fenn> ah, ok 12:33 < fenn> its all lost in the mists of time for me 12:33 < kanzure> procto: So shouldn't that be done via tech, instead of a government? 12:33 < kanzure> 'granted' means totally nill when faced with the destructive firepower of this battle station 12:33 < kanzure> or whatever the Star Wars quote is :) 12:33 < procto> however, these freedoms cannt be granted via nonscoercive measures, if restricted to that group 12:33 < kanzure> fenn: same here, I wish I would've shown up back then 12:34 < kanzure> procto: what the hell are you talking about with 'granted' 12:34 < kanzure> whether or not you can do X is totally dependent on technical feasability, not politics 12:34 < fenn> procto: freedom is the natural state of things, only limited by oppression and coercion 12:34 < fenn> and technical feasibility :) 12:35 < procto> heh, I don't interact enough with other transhumanists and such, so my nomenclature is tuned to be least offensive to an average person 12:35 < procto> but yes, i am fully agreed on that point 12:35 < procto> so "granted" is in refernce to the current state of things 12:35 < procto> where I have them restricted 12:36 < procto> rather than positing an authority that may be in the business of granting freedoms 12:36 < procto> when i say "government" I merely mean a framework. an infrastructure for social decisions 12:36 < kanzure> I see. 12:36 < procto> I think the best way to do that is via tech 12:36 < fenn> perhaps you should identify the current methods of oppression and restriction forced upon you 12:36 < procto> currently we have a large beurocrcay performing the same function 12:38 < procto> I tend to follow a cycle of collecting knowledge intensely which alternates with creating thingC[C[C[C[C[C[C[Cs 12:38 < fenn> the problem with tech is that right now you have to be a multinational corporation to provide your liberating tech to a large segment of the population 12:38 < procto> right now I'm in the knowledge acquisition stage 12:39 < fenn> and you need to affect a large segment of the population to influence popular opinion, cultural norms, laws, etc 12:39 < procto> so i'm planning to be involved in diybio, which is how I found this channel 12:39 < procto> D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D[D/whois fenn 12:39 < procto> ding 12:40 < procto> sorry, some weird lag is going on 12:40 < fenn> how do you plan on avoiding harassment as a 'possible bioterrorist'? 12:40 * kanzure just read an awesome quote on extropy-chat; http://heybryan.org/emails/death_does_not_give_meaning_to_life.html 12:40 < fenn> its hard to even order chemicals, much less specific biotech reagents and kits 12:41 < procto> at the moment, I am merely learning by learning, rather than learning by oind. I do not know enough of what I may want to do to formulate protection against my intentions being misconstrued 12:41 < procto> perhaps it may be even more complicated for me, since I am not even a US citizen 12:42 < kanzure> procto: knowledge acquistion stage? 12:42 < kanzure> procto: I'm glad that you found us through diybio.org :) 12:42 < kanzure> procto: http://biohack.sf.net/ was what I had online a few months before diybio.org showed up on the scene 12:42 < kanzure> so now I'm organizing it a bit better, see the youtube link 12:43 < procto> kanzure: yeah. i mean, I "geek out" on a subject intensely usually for a couple of mons 12:43 < kanzure> it's turning into http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/Bioreactors but very slowly 12:43 < kanzure> procto: So do I. 12:43 < kanzure> procto: re: geeking out, check this stuff out: 12:43 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/thinking.html 12:43 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/intense_world_syndrome.html 12:43 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/Sustained_attention 12:43 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/2008-05-13_hyperfocusing.html 12:43 < fenn> procto: 'larval stage' 12:43 < procto> hehe 12:44 < procto> i have a blog at http://mockingeye.com btw 12:44 < kanzure> procto: http://heybryan.org/shots/2008-05-23_autoscholar.png <-- that's what my machine mostly looks like 12:44 * kanzure boots up akregator (110k unread feed items) 12:44 * nsh chastises kanzure for 'off of' 12:44 < kanzure> nsh: hrm? 12:44 < procto> and my main project right now is http://djiyo.com 12:44 < nsh> "Minicolumns, genius and autism; the research being reported in the a-shade-of-grey blog article is from Casanova (m0casa02@louisville.edu) (Wp) (researcher), studying the minicolumnar basis of the hierarchical temporal memory (HTM) (cite Jeff Hawkings / On Intelligence) structure of the brain, based off of the organization of minicolumns into macrocolumns." 12:44 < nsh> maybe not your notes 12:45 < procto> there is nothing wrong with off of 12:45 < nsh> bad americanism though. v. bad 12:45 < nsh> this isn't up for debate. 12:45 < kanzure> nsh: they are 12:45 < kanzure> hrm 12:45 < kanzure> "based off of the" 12:45 < kanzure> that's bad? 12:45 < nsh> from please 12:45 < procto> it isn't 12:45 < nsh> or i will be unable to read :-) 12:45 < nsh> or 'on' 12:45 < kanzure> nsh: /me goes to edit 12:45 < procto> don't listen the prescriptivist brain washing :> 12:45 < nsh> some things just reflect badly 12:45 < fenn> 'based on' not 'based from' 12:46 * nsh nods: either from or on depending on the context 12:46 < kanzure> nsh, procto - if you read intense_world_syndrome.html, I suggest you refresh it 12:46 < procto> well, there are things which you may place in certain registers. the wrong register may be being used. 12:46 < kanzure> nsh: I've finally updated that page, I was stupid for not putting the intro at the top 12:46 < nsh> kanzure, cool. nice one 12:46 < kanzure> procto: So, one of my projects is a 'geeking out' system. See the sustained_attention wiki page I linked to above. 12:46 < procto> discrimintating en the basis of register choice is worse than the misselection 12:47 < nsh> procto: seriously though. it's in the same column as "could care less", and "rediculous" 12:47 < kanzure> The idea is to maintain a sustained attention / hyperfocusing / insightful session for as long as possible. Btw, sleep is allowed, just saying. 12:47 < kanzure> procto: re: djiyo, see http://heybryan.org/exp.html - fenn and I want to 'ground the semantic web' (in a sense) 12:47 < kanzure> it's not quite the same thing 12:47 < kanzure> but it's on the same plane of thought 12:48 < fenn> hmm djiyo seems more relevant to augmented reality than anything 12:48 < procto> nsh: that's fine. I just want you to realize that your ingrained dislike for registers, delegating them to basilect status may be unfair, and without true merit. the usual claim is that basilects somehow hinder efficient communication, which is false. 12:48 < procto> fenn: yes, it's an agumented reality system 12:48 < fenn> procto: wtf is a register? 12:49 < procto> just that most augmented reality projects seem to be mostly working on fancy goggles 12:49 < fenn> i want some fancy goggles 12:49 < procto> sorry, sometimes I forget to define my terms 12:49 < procto> goggles are nice, but expensive and hard 12:49 < fenn> slaved to a laptop 12:49 < procto> bluetooth headsets are already here and cheap 12:49 < procto> and also, socially acceptable 12:49 < kanzure> procto: Re: virtuality, virtual reality, other stuff like that: 12:49 < kanzure> grr 12:49 < kanzure> hold on, formatting 12:49 < fenn> well, really i just want a small HUD based on a DLP chip 12:50 < fenn> glasses-mounted, not big VR goggles so much 12:50 < procto> fenn: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Register_%28linguistics%29 12:51 < kanzure> `DZ: I would say that is exactly true. And more, I would say that the so-called virtual realities are misnamed: they should be called something like "simulated experiences." Because they aren't real, and can never be so, any more than a map can be the territory.  12:51 < kanzure> And more, for the same reason that a map is necessarily less detailed than the territory that it describes, a virtual reality can only 12:51 < kanzure> ever be a pale shadow of the real thing. Such constructs might prove amusing, or even useful and illuminating, but how could they ever take the place of the essential reality that they represent?` 12:51 < fenn> i think nsh's objection is to 'dumbing down' the language, which leads to 'dumbing down' the interaction and the ideas presented 12:52 < kanzure> there's certainly no lack of dense terminology and wordplay on my site :( 12:52 < procto> I agree. how does one define what is more dumb? 12:52 < fenn> if we started talking about eminem, it would be dumb 12:52 < kanzure> how do you define intelligence anyway? ;-) 12:52 < fenn> even if we used proper formal grammar 12:52 < kanzure> Intelligence doesn't exactly have a good track record yet. 12:52 < procto> most prescriptions in the english language today date from the 19th century where latin grammar was arbitrarily imposed on english 12:53 < nsh> ASD? 12:53 < kanzure> nsh: Autism spectrum disorders 12:53 < nsh> autistic spectrum disorders? 12:53 < nsh> ah 12:53 < kanzure> heh, the auties out on the internet did a press release in 2004 12:53 < kanzure> asking for "international immunity" and acknowledgement as a minority group 12:53 < procto> specifically as a form of social distinction 12:53 < fenn> kanzure: "virtual realities" are indeed real, they're electrical currents moving around in computer chips around the world 12:54 < kanzure> fenn: I just remembered that many people use 'intelligence' to mean something close to 'the ability to overcome genetic constraints'. 12:54 < procto> formal grammars (distinguish from a fromal register) are unnecessary, and can hinder communication more than discregarding them 12:54 < kanzure> fenn: yes, but you're still relating them to the fundamental reality on the electrical circuits and so on 12:54 < kanzure> fenn: whereas escaping into a virtual reality and thinking it's totally real, is not a good idea, for you are ignoring so much of the implementation details 12:54 < nsh> did anyone read permutation city? 12:54 < kanzure> nsh: I had a friend read it for me 12:54 < fenn> an electrical current is just as real as sunshine and butterflies 12:54 < kanzure> a 'goon' :) 12:55 * nsh smiles 12:55 < kanzure> fenn: No, there's something else going on there that I think you're neglecting. 12:55 < fenn> many people escape into the wilderness, forgetting that the sun is a fusion reactor and a butterfly is an insect that's close to death 12:55 < kanzure> it's more that some people think they want 'virtual reality' to replace 'reality' 12:55 < procto> I'm not familira with al-l you mod els and nomenclature yet, but I strive towards making virtual "stuff" a facet of the world 12:56 < kanzure> fenn: and it's important to realize that 'virtual reality' can never fundamentally replace 'reality' 12:56 < nsh> one of the themes was the ontological independence of reality from its substrate 12:56 < nsh> like the independence of various phase transitions to their underlying mechanics in renormalisation group theory 12:56 < nsh> we're only seeing the tip of the iceberg of universality at the moment, i'd venture 12:56 < fenn> kanzure: is a sign real? are buildings real? 12:56 < kanzure> no matter how clueless you are, those nuclear reactors are still chugging away 12:57 < kanzure> fenn: I would argue that this is more about the person's brain; should they happen to know about signs, buildings and the wilderness, would they be intellectually honest with thinking that their escapism (virtual reality) truly fixes whatever issues are out there beyond that virtual reality? 12:57 < kanzure> procto: So, that merging of the digital and the physical is much of Gershenfeld's ideas. 12:57 < procto> kanzure: http://heybryan.org/shots/2008-05-23_autoscholar.png 404 12:57 < kanzure> procto: whereas we like to stay somewhat away from Kurzweil. (These two were paired side by side in the IEEE Spectrum article this month) http://heybryan.org/fernhout/ for some essays 12:57 < kanzure> procto: gimme a moment 12:57 < kanzure> bah, wrong month 12:57 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/shots/2008-03-23_autoscholar.png 12:58 < fenn> time flies when you're having fun :) 12:58 < procto> kanzure: did i say something kurzweilian? 12:58 < kanzure> procto: no 12:58 < kanzure> procto: hold on 12:58 < kanzure> procto: I'm just saying that you said something like Gershenfeld. 12:58 < fenn> making virtual "stuff" a facet of the world 12:59 < kanzure> And I pulled out a reference to Kurzweil since Gershenfeld and Kurzweil were paired as "opposite sides of the spectrum" in IEEE Spectrum. 12:59 < kanzure> And then I linked over to some F/OSS perspectives on Kurzweil. 12:59 < procto> ah, I see 12:59 * nsh needs to study glutamate more 12:59 < kanzure> nsh: indeed :) 12:59 < kanzure> so do I. 12:59 < kanzure> I want to read up on the glutamatergic system and the cholinergic system more. 12:59 < procto> kanzure: Ive read thoese 12:59 < kanzure> procto: /fernhout/ ? 13:00 -!- kanzure changed the topic of #hplusroadmap to: Intro: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXKbzbeipmI http://diybio.org/ http://openwetware.org/ | diy bio toolkit: http://biohack.sf.net/ | Automated societal knowledge (put it to work): http://heybryan.org/exp.html | Channel wiki: http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/ | F/OSS perspectives on Kurzweil: http://heybryan.org/fernhout/ 13:00 < fenn> eegh 13:00 < fenn> is the topic long enough yet? 13:00 < kanzure> nope, maybe I can put all of my links in there 13:00 < kanzure> we need a way to tone it down 13:00 < fenn> all 20k of htem 13:00 < kanzure> yep 13:01 * nsh is lost in entoptic phenomena 13:02 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/topic.html 13:02 < kanzure> there 13:02 < procto> kanzure: yeah. I saw them linked on the diybio list 13:02 < kanzure> Huh? 13:02 < kanzure> oh, the fernhout essays 13:02 < kanzure> good 13:02 < kanzure> You like? 13:02 < procto> kanzure: are you in the area? i.e. attend the diybio meetings? 13:02 < kanzure> procto: No, I am in Austin, Texas. 13:03 < kanzure> Totally wrong part of the continent. 13:03 < procto> I like, but disagree with some parts of them 13:03 < kanzure> How so? 13:03 < kanzure> Oh, the microbes on virtual brains stuff 13:03 < kanzure> That was a bit out there. ;-) 13:03 < procto> hang on, I'll try to find an example of something I disagreed with 13:04 < kanzure> I think we need some essays like that, in general. It's good to be able to point out what I don't quite like about Kurzweil. 13:04 < fenn> structured argument 13:04 < kanzure> hrm? 13:05 < fenn> its one of the engelbart ideas that never made it into the www 13:05 < fenn> not yet at least 13:05 < kanzure> nsh: "One of the themes was .." <-- themes of what ? 13:05 < kanzure> I think we already implement that idea though 13:05 < kanzure> such as when we are trying to come up with a way to make an idea work / be technically feasible 13:05 < kanzure> feasability testing / validation (re: autospec in skdb) 13:05 < kanzure> or autogenix, whatever 13:06 < kanzure> I think that's autogenix. not skdb. 13:06 < fenn> layers of abstraction is an important engineering concept 13:07 < fenn> it reduces the amount of itnelligecne reqireud to understand something 13:07 * kanzure still doesn't know about this whole 'intelligence' thing 13:07 * fenn wonders if he's really typing this stuff 13:07 < nsh> kanzure, themes of permutation city 13:08 < nsh> they upload themselves into a virtual city, running on a virtual exponentially-replicating von-neuman processor 13:08 < procto> kanzure: in kurzweil1.html there is a strong argument based on work by Marshall Sahlins which i haven't read 13:08 < kanzure> nsh: So, I mentioned I had a goon read it. The goon reported that Egan was talking about 'virtual realities that would separate from their fundamental reality and exist forever and ever even if the microprocessor on which it was running was smashed'. I don't know if Egan would go that route, however. 13:09 < nsh> that's a rough charactature of the idea 13:09 < nsh> but essentially correct 13:09 < kanzure> if it's just an exponential von Neumann thing, then that's more reliable 13:09 < nsh> it's worth reading the book, imho 13:09 < fenn> does he use faster than light communications? 13:09 < nsh> or the short story 'dust' which was its basis 13:09 * kanzure has it on his shelf 13:10 < kanzure> and in my cache apparently 13:10 < kanzure> okay, I'm getting back into business mode 13:11 < fenn> http://fennetic.net/pub/irc/Greg%20Egan%20-%20Permutation City.pdf 13:11 < kanzure> :) 13:11 < fenn> missed one 13:11 < fenn> http://fennetic.net/pub/irc/Greg%20Egan%20-%20Permutation%20City.pdf 13:12 < kanzure> fenn: instead of the selections for stupid polymerases, why not just use a polymerase that has (1) a mutated template-reading-arm that accepts an unnatural nucleotide, (2) binding to a beta clamp on a DNA strand that is being made (since the template strand thinger is taken); (3) incorporation of biosynthetic pathways into the genome so that the unnatural nucleotides can be manufactured 13:12 < nsh> beta clamp? 13:12 < kanzure> now we'd need an inhibition/activation genetic regulatory network / circuit deal to control the production of those unnatural nucleotides 13:12 < fenn> its the polymerase subunit that attaches/slides along the DNA 13:13 < kanzure> synthetic circuits would be awesome for that, unfortunately those don't work in vivo 13:13 < procto> kanzure: but I disagree with the view of a hunter gatherer model as a more... idyllic way. there are some examples of agrarian, but non-specialived societies with central beurocracies. this is true only to a certain degree. yes, the farms were mostly self-sufficient, however, their surplus output is what allowed for the creation of cities, which is where the specialization occured. 13:13 < nsh> i see 13:13 < kanzure> procto: sure, I don't know how important the hunter-gatherer model is to his arguments 13:13 < kanzure> fenn: so maybe we'd need in vitro transcription to make the proteins? but this means implementing the majority of the cellular functionality in vitro 13:13 < kanzure> and that sounds absurd 13:13 < procto> kanzure: at the same time, I am in total agreement as far as kurzeil utter naivete in regards to "evolution" 13:14 < fenn> kanzure: you can just feed them unnatural nucleotides.. i dont know what they're used for in your experiment? 13:14 < kanzure> fenn: the unnatural nucleotides are used to signal the polymerases 13:14 < kanzure> so we still have four polymerases 13:14 < kanzure> but each one has a modified template arm thinger that matches only to each of the four types of different unnatural nucleotides 13:14 < nsh> remind me what the main objective is here, kanzure 13:14 < procto> intelligence is clearly not a convergent feature 13:14 < kanzure> nsh: in vitro DNA synthesizer, totally biological 13:15 < fenn> in-vivo hopefully 13:15 < kanzure> nsh: http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/In_vitro_DNA_synthesizer 13:15 < nsh> dank 13:15 < kanzure> right 13:15 < kanzure> fenn: so, just feeding them the unnatural nucleotides sounds like it might require additional nonbiological components 13:16 < fenn> procto: the reprap project has the same problem regarding misunderstanding evolution 13:16 < fenn> kanzure: ok, i thought the unnatural nucleotides were somehow part of your selection protocol 13:16 < kanzure> maybe a genetic regulatory network ( http://heybryan.org/genetic-circuits.html at the bottom re: the oxytocin production circuit ) 13:16 < kanzure> nope, no massive selections needed in this case :) hurray 13:17 < fenn> why not? 13:17 < kanzure> I mean, it might require selections for the unnatural nucleotide stuff, in a sense 13:17 < kanzure> well, it's just not the same level of infeasability I suppose 13:17 < kanzure> before, we were going to have to come up with a completely new polymerase 13:17 < kanzure> a retarded polymerase, one that had very little chance of selection because naturally it can't produce itself and so on 13:18 < kanzure> for procto or nsh or something -- a retarded polymerase that writes only A's, or only C's or only G's or only T's etc. 13:18 < fenn> you're sending the information with nucleotide concentration "smoke signals"? you change the idea every couple hours, hard to follow 13:18 < kanzure> fenn: yes 13:18 < nsh> kanzure, right 13:18 < kanzure> fenn: but remember, that's what we were thinking of before anyway 13:18 < kanzure> with signaling polymerase. 13:18 < fenn> no, not me 13:18 < kanzure> yeah we were 13:18 * nsh brb but will catchup buffer (if you don't steam ahead too fast) 13:18 < fenn> too slow 13:18 < kanzure> meh 13:18 < fenn> and unreliable 13:18 < kanzure> not unerliable 13:18 < kanzure> *unreliable 13:18 < fenn> you have to rely on stochastic processes like degradation 13:19 < kanzure> since nucleotides diffuse quickly, I figure we can also diffuse something to eat the nucleotides before our next round 13:19 < kanzure> but you're right about slowness 13:19 < fenn> it will go away with a half life, a logarithmic decay curve 13:20 < fenn> so 1/2^(delay) percent chance of getting it wrong 13:20 < procto> must be off now! I will be back 13:20 < fenn> something like that anyway 13:21 < fenn> nice to meet you procto 13:21 < nsh> peace procto 13:22 * nsh would suspect that protein inactivation by reactive oxygen species generation would not be easily reversible 13:23 < kanzure> my unnatural nucleotide smoke signals will not work because of the difficulty of acquiring the unnatural nucleotides 13:23 < kanzure> okay, so what if we had some other random idea 13:24 < kanzure> and it still required nucleotides 13:24 < kanzure> it's going to :) that's a given 13:24 < kanzure> these nucleotides are going to come from somewhere too 13:24 < kanzure> in the bioreactor case they are going to come from cell cultures that are producing them somehow, and we just kill the part of the culture to come up with our nucleotides 13:24 < kanzure> yes? 13:24 * nsh ponders 13:24 < kanzure> so that would be the same for unnatural nucleotides 13:24 < kanzure> however, if we are *using* the nucleotides as smoke signals 13:24 < nsh> can you explain what you mean by unnatural exactly? 13:24 < kanzure> we need to either (1) control their biosynthesis and production and so on, or (2) be able to separate them very, very accurately 13:25 < kanzure> nsh: there's some researchers that are able to augment the alphabet of life 13:25 < kanzure> by expanding it with unnatural nucleotides 13:25 < nsh> oh, i see 13:25 < kanzure> so, not A's, not C's, not T's, not G's. Other stuff. :) 13:25 < nsh> are they viable for long dna strands? 13:25 < kanzure> apparently :) 13:25 < fenn> nsh: a cell normally makes NTP's to use for energy distribution, synthesizing DNA. you cant change the concentrations if doing so kills the cell 13:26 * nsh nods 13:27 < nsh> i'm thinking 13:27 < kanzure> so how would we purify unnatural nucleotides, or even NTPs, in the case of the cell cultures producing them thanks to input foods (sugars, probably) ? 13:28 < kanzure> more to the point, how do we control the release of those nucleotides as smoke signals 13:28 < kanzure> in genetic regulatory networks we could have feedback systems and so on 13:28 < kanzure> which would be awesome 13:28 < kanzure> but at the moment I don't see how any of this would work in vivo 13:28 < kanzure> (the GRNs could regulate the production of those smoke signalers) 13:30 * nsh was entertaining the idea of a tandem reaction: polymerase constructing dna from NTPs and another enzyme degrading DNA to produce NTPs 13:30 < nsh> if you could have reciprocal feedback between these coupled reactions 13:30 < kanzure> hm? 13:30 < nsh> then you might be able to lock the logic such that nucleotides could only be added in a predetermined sequence 13:30 < kanzure> yeah, some way to control the rates of each 13:31 < nsh> right, so the polymerase can't do anymore until it gets some new NTPs 13:31 < nsh> and the degradation enzyme needs some DNA to degrade 13:31 < kanzure> yes, and the polymerases can't really move (beta clamp lock method -- just put something in its way, etc.), and the polymerases might not have motors, or something like that 13:31 < nsh> right 13:32 < kanzure> the degradation enzyme would be present in the "smash up a percentage of the cell culture" tank/pod/portion 13:32 < kanzure> and then we need a purification system (ugh) 13:32 < nsh> biggest problem then is converting the desired sequence into a system of logic gates made from these coupled reactions 13:32 < fenn> i really like the tagged protein idea 13:32 < fenn> for purification 13:33 < kanzure> purification of NTPs? 13:33 < kanzure> or just purification of everything else 13:33 < fenn> no, just everything else 13:33 < kanzure> hrm 13:33 < nsh> i remember reading some stuff about PCR computing that seemed able to make logic gates from PCR products 13:33 < fenn> its easy once you have a direct write DNA synthesizer :) 13:33 < kanzure> nsh: transcriptional switches, yeah 13:33 < fenn> that's kanzure's lab 13:34 < nsh> cross-pairing ring a bell? 13:34 < nsh> i think that was the term they used 13:34 < kanzure> not quite 13:35 < nsh> you have elsevier access atm? 13:35 < kanzure> yes 13:35 * kanzure has most everything access :) 13:35 * kanzure grins 13:35 < nsh> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VHX-4PKPH3T-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ae21ce2ec1e3c774443ee7d5c10b7aaa 13:35 < nsh> you should set me up a proxy 13:35 * nsh annoyed to have to wait until lab to access articles 13:35 < kanzure> nsh: your lab doesn't have a proxy? 13:35 < kanzure> usually it's through the library's ezproxy system 13:35 < nsh> doesn't seem so 13:36 < nsh> i explored briefly to no avail and no-one seemed to have a clue 13:36 * nsh should push it some more 13:36 < kanzure> finland? 13:37 < nsh> university of tampere, finland 13:38 < kanzure> http://www.uta.fi/laitokset/kirjasto/english/nelli/remote.php 13:38 < kanzure> http://www.uta.fi/laitokset/kirjasto/english/nelli/remote.php 13:38 < kanzure> erm 13:39 < kanzure> http://www.nelliportaali.fi/V/9HYD5KUUF82PDFXVK7PJ6DMIFBM9LNU38LHCQQLRM97TGGAP22-10793?func=file&file_name=home 13:39 < kanzure> http://www.nelliportaali.fi/V/9HYD5KUUF82PDFXVK7PJ6DMIFBM9LNU38LHCQQLRM97TGGAP22-45380?func=file&file_name=home 13:39 < nsh> yeah, it has a database of journals 13:39 < nsh> but no proxy function that i could find 13:39 < kanzure> right .. 13:39 < kanzure> it's "remote access" 13:39 < kanzure> https://weblogin.uta.fi/ 13:40 * nsh has tried :-) 13:41 < kanzure> I keep losing track of what problems I am thinking about.; 13:41 < kanzure> if we have cells that can do the biosynthesis of the nucleotides, and if we have a way to do the purification procedures, I think it's good 13:42 < nsh> heh, i got it working this time 13:42 < nsh> kanzure++ 13:50 < kanzure> so far it seems like we'd need to manually move the purified nucleotides over to the in vitro synthesizer tank 13:50 < kanzure> actually, it could be in vivo since we don't need the transcriptional switches any more 13:50 < kanzure> but that's only if we can get the GRN to accept laser input 13:51 < kanzure> so the production of nucleotides would be within the cells, and somehow they would get to our polymerases and so on 13:51 < kanzure> but how would you control those cells and their production of each of the enzymes used to make the nucleotides and so on? 13:53 < kanzure> the project that I am working on in the lab is in vitro, but it is an attempt to make a system where by the frequency of laser input or some other input can be translated into kinetic changes 13:53 * nsh hates ingentaconnect 13:53 < kanzure> ingentaconnect doesn't do much to connect 13:53 < nsh> should be called ingentawithhold 13:54 < nsh> can you elaborate on kinetic changes? 13:54 < kanzure> one of the advantages of the massive number of computer viruses out there is that many people have written viruses to steal university library proxy login credentials 13:54 * nsh smiles 13:54 < kanzure> nsh: by that, specifically, I mean that the frequency of a laser shining could be translated into morris code in some readable format by the biological circuit 13:55 < nsh> morse? 13:55 < kanzure> moirs? 13:55 < kanzure> *moris? 13:55 < nsh> . . . - - - . . . morse :-) 13:55 < kanzure> right 13:55 < kanzure> so that's binary 13:55 * nsh nods 13:56 < kanzure> so if the circuit involves transcriptional switches which logically dictate what actions happen next 13:56 < kanzure> then you're just flipping the switches 13:56 < nsh> right 13:56 < kanzure> we're working on a tiny component of it 13:56 < kanzure> namely the oscillator portion 13:57 < kanzure> I'm not convinced yet that the entire system is feasible 13:57 < nsh> is there a description of the project anywhere? 13:57 < kanzure> nsh: gimme your email address 13:57 < kanzure> actually 13:57 < kanzure> hold on 13:57 < nsh> ffr: lauri.love@gmail.com 13:57 < nsh> (for future reference) 13:58 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/ellingtonia/ellingtonia/86-NJ820__04_14_2008_06_06_10_PM.pdf_[Q62jfc].pdf 13:58 < nsh> ty 13:59 < kanzure> pg 7 diagram 14:00 -!- Splicer [n=p@h87n1c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 14:00 < kanzure> Hey Splicer. 14:00 < Splicer> hi Kanzure 14:01 * nsh needs to start pushing document folding harder 14:01 < kanzure> ? 14:01 < nsh> for example, that pdf: if i just wanted a basic idea of what it is, i should only need a paragraph 14:02 < kanzure> sure 14:02 < kanzure> the abstract :) 14:02 < nsh> then if i wanted to get an overview of how it's going to be implemented, i could unfold that into there or four 14:02 < kanzure> yep 14:02 < nsh> then keep unfolding to the degree of detail i require 14:02 < kanzure> btw, I have an idea for how to do that 14:02 < kanzure> via catching the unused output of the human brain while writing sentences 14:02 < kanzure> and then having machines elaborate and incorporate that data so that grammar can be 'unfolded' 14:02 < kanzure> to some extent, at least. 14:02 < nsh> hmm 14:03 < nsh> how do you mean unused output? 14:03 < kanzure> when you are thinking about what to write, there are many more things to be said than what you actually do end up saying 14:03 < kanzure> this is the nature of an axon, sadly 14:03 < nsh> right 14:03 < kanzure> many inputs, only one output 14:03 < nsh> hmm 14:04 < kanzure> I don't even know what I was originally thinking of, to get the smoke signals with transcriptional switches ... it's not going to happen. You need to have enzymes. What more, you need to control the production of the nucleotides too. 14:05 < kanzure> if you're using some sort of frequency input, you need that 'phase lock system' to some extent 14:05 * nsh agrees 14:05 < kanzure> but then that requires the switches 14:05 < kanzure> well. 14:05 < kanzure> I guess we can have transcriptional switches bound to a metal plate upstream, and have them all communicate to figure out what the frequency input is saying 14:06 < nsh> hm 14:06 < kanzure> need to get a message downstream 14:06 < kanzure> where the cells are 14:09 < Splicer> on the hi-def MRI discussion yesterday, have you seen this(x-ray):http://www.jove.com/index/Details.stp?ID=737 14:11 < nsh> 20.5 KeV is non-invasive 14:11 * nsh smiles 14:13 < Splicer> 0.7micrometer resolution 14:13 < nsh> 0.7 micrometer is pretty impressive resolution 14:13 < nsh> yeah 14:13 < Splicer> yeah 14:14 < nsh> you could probably lower that with software by some creative use of angles and displacements 14:16 < nsh> argh, it's eating me! 14:17 * nsh wonders what the scan-time is 14:17 < nsh> "Samples were measured with an energy of 20.5 keV. The radiographs were recorded with a cooled CCD (ESRF FReLoN camera) with a 14-bit dynamic range, 2048×2048 pixels and an effective pixel size of 0.7 µm. 1500 projections were recorded over the 180° sample rotation with an exposure time of 0.35 s for each projection. The detector-to-sample distance was 20 mm." 14:19 < kanzure> wasn't there something about genetic regulatory network logic gaes 14:19 < kanzure> *logic gates 14:19 < kanzure> aha, yes 14:20 < nsh> mm? 14:20 < kanzure> and it's my understanding that the original Elowitz ring oscillator was a GRN too 14:21 < kanzure> so that means that we can potentially do all of this in vivo 14:21 < kanzure> no transcriptional switches 14:21 < kanzure> now the trick is seeing about an implementation of that paper re: a phase-lock loop system, implemented in terms of a GRN 14:22 < kanzure> the frequency input still gets to me, I'm not sure how quite to do that in vitro nor in vivo 14:22 * nsh doesn't like it when a google query returns more PPT files than PDF 14:22 < nsh> it tells me: hype 14:22 < kanzure> what query? 14:23 < nsh> Elowitz ring oscillator digital logic 14:23 < nsh> (also, i don't have a ppt reader on this box, annoyingly) 14:24 < nsh> actually, probably less hype than pedagogical overviews 14:25 < nsh> http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/pierre.lescanne/ENSEIGNEMENT/GAMES_AND_LOGIC/Wolf_D_Motifs_modules_and_games_in_bacteria.pdf looks interesting 14:25 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/ellingtonia/genetic-circuits/Toggles and oscillators - new genetic circuit designs.pdf 14:25 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/ellingtonia/genetic-circuits/Robust control in bacterial regulatory circuits.pdf 14:25 < kanzure> in fact, 14:25 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/ellingtonia/genetic-circuits/ 14:26 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/ellingtonia/weiss/Towards in vivo digital circuits - protein-based - BioSPICE - Weiss - Tom Knight - dimacs99-evocomp.pdf 14:26 < kanzure> Tom Knight hurray \o/ 14:27 < kanzure> now I remember something sucking about GRNs 14:27 < kanzure> what was it? 14:28 < nsh> scaling? 14:28 < kanzure> nah 14:28 < kanzure> maybe something about protein engineering being needed in some cases 14:28 < kanzure> I'll ask the grad student when I go back to the lab 14:29 < kanzure> I wonder if I should be there today 14:29 < nsh> what's the time in austin? 14:30 < nsh> are you -4 UTC? 14:30 < kanzure> 1:30 14:30 < kanzure> we're GMT -6 14:30 < kanzure> "I don't believe in time zones any more. I'm done with that bullshit." 14:30 < kanzure> "Why?" 14:31 < kanzure> "Well, are you in my time zone?" 14:31 < kanzure> "No." 14:31 < kanzure> "And yet you're talking with me at the same time. Huh. Seems like a scam to me." 14:31 * nsh smiles 14:31 < nsh> circadian rhythms aren't a scam :-) 14:32 < kanzure> orly 14:32 < nsh> they're biological baggage 14:33 < nsh> and the problem is, we're not entirely sure what's in the baggage, and how useful it might be to us in the future 14:33 < nsh> so we have to lug it around for a while longer 14:35 -!- Phreedom [n=freedom@www.online.dn.ua] has quit [Remote closed the connection] 14:36 * nsh likes how this Tom Knight paper is (C) 0000 (Copyright holder) 14:40 < nsh> i'm going to take a break and ruminate 14:40 < nsh> catch you later 14:40 < kanzure> cya 14:41 < kanzure> http://elowitz.caltech.edu/ 14:41 < kanzure> having yourname.caltech.edu is neat :) 14:45 < kanzure> ' logous phenomena at other levels of biological organization. Synthetic biology: One example of this approach is the Repressilator, a synthetic oscillatory network constructed in the bacteria Escherichia coli (Elowitz & Leibler, 2000). The Repressilator is designed to cause oscillations in the level of gene expression o 14:45 < kanzure> http://elowitz.caltech.edu/research.html 15:30 < Splicer> It's interesting that the swatch time never took off. I thought it was a good idea at the time. 15:30 < kanzure> ? 15:30 < Splicer> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time 17:50 < kanzure> http://superkuh.ath.cx/ 17:56 < kanzure> meh, maybe lasers won't be required 17:56 < kanzure> just use some proteins 18:00 -!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)] 18:05 -!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined #hplusroadmap 18:35 -!- percent [n=percent@66.158.193.28] has joined #hplusroadmap 18:35 < kanzure> There we go. 18:35 < percent> Well, I'm here. 18:35 < kanzure> Where were we? 18:36 < percent> Dunno, something about interior decoration? 18:37 < percent> So what is this place? 18:37 < percent> Some backwater biohacker haven? 18:37 < kanzure> Yes. It's where I collect brains. 18:38 < percent> In jars or in heads? 18:38 < kanzure> Meh. Depends on how cooperative they are. 18:38 < percent> Splicer runs biopunk, yes? 18:38 < kanzure> Yes. 18:39 < percent> So what now? I can just ask random bio questions here? 18:39 < percent> Even stupid ones? 18:39 < kanzure> Sure, but I'd prefer it if you have a goal in mind or something. 18:40 < percent> Let's cure cancer. 18:40 < percent> Actually, hepatitis D is more interesting to me. 18:40 < percent> Name another virus that does genetic silencing in humans. 18:41 < kanzure> Okay, so curing cancer. 18:41 < kanzure> What's so bad about cancer? 18:41 < kanzure> Specifically, to humans. Not in general. 18:42 < percent> Aside from uncontrolled cellular growth? Nothin'. 18:42 < kanzure> Uh? Impairment of functionality. 18:42 < kanzure> That's a big one. 18:43 < percent> I was being sarcastic. 18:43 < kanzure> My point is that the problem of cancer can be treated with the nanoparticle delivery of toxic agents via laser activation, it could be treated with more stringent controls on DNA and so on, but man. It's a bad problem. 18:43 < kanzure> So instead, why not just get rid of anything that fails. 18:44 < percent> I don't know much about DNA repair and failure. 18:46 < kanzure> Basically it all sucks. 18:46 < kanzure> The alternative is to get rid of those components. Let's replace them. 18:46 < kanzure> hrm, a neuronal patch clamp + neurogenesis + stem cell researcher in ##neuroscience just linked me to - http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/18/4/763 re http://heybryan.org/intense_world_syndrome.html 18:49 < kanzure> So, if it can go cancerous, it's not good. 18:50 < kanzure> The main thing that we have to worry about is brain cancer, I think. 18:50 < kanzure> Since there's generally no solution to maintaining any sense of persistency pertaining to the brain, its structures, development, any tricks the tissues might know, and so on. 18:52 < Splicer> wasn't there some guy who was researching a way to boot up mithochondria in cancer cells... something about cancer bypassing mitochondria for energy and they were the ones who initiated apostosis. 18:54 < Splicer> (nice to see you mr percent) 18:56 < kanzure> Splicer: You mean Aubrey? 18:57 < Splicer> Evangelos Michelakis 18:58 < Splicer> this guy: http://twit.tv/fib21 19:03 < percent> sorry, i had a phone call 19:03 < percent> Okay, I have a dumb question 19:04 < percent> Let's say we have a genetic cure for cancer, magical, right? How do we implement it? 19:05 < percent> And nice to meet you too, Splicer. 19:07 < percent> So, if cancer cells run only on glucose...are their mitochrondia broken because of this, or are broken mitochondria the cause of this? 19:09 < kanzure> Screw the cells. They suck for being cancerous. 19:09 < kanzure> Backups, backups, backups. 19:10 < percent> why reinvent the wheel? the cells know they're cancerous, don't they? wouldn't they undergo apoptosis if they could? 19:10 < Splicer> i actually don't know how to patch something that would pass to the next generation 19:11 < percent> I was speaking more about a full human body. 19:11 < percent> Or a mouse. 19:11 < percent> actually screw mice those things are mean 19:14 < Splicer> there are many things in this I don't know... but it the current idea seems to be that cancer shuts dom mithocondria on purpose to avoid apostosis... as opposed to the way it used to be seen.. that the metabolism was a byproduct oc the cancer. 19:15 < Splicer> I got into a discussion with a dr about this and she made me understand there was more to this... 19:16 < percent> So, even in bacteria, the modifications wouldn't last long? 19:17 < percent> And is that because of restriction enzymes? 19:18 < Splicer> not sure how you mean 19:19 < percent> Let's say I have bacteria. I create an altered genetic profile for it, to make it glow or something equally novel. 19:19 < Splicer> yeah.. the next generation will glow too 19:20 < percent> How exactly do I implement it? Wouldn't the DNA be destroyed by the bacteria's defense mechanisms? 19:20 < percent> like restriction enzymes? 19:20 < percent> I'm new at this, so forgive my dumb questions 19:20 < Splicer> me too 19:22 < Splicer> the bacteria hacking thing is hit/miss... the way I understand it the plasmids used to add the injected DNA puts it in random locations 19:23 < Splicer> then the wanted bacteria are selected for.. and after that... they have that DNA and that's the DNA they copy forwards to 19:25 < percent> "Copy forward" = replicates to? 19:25 < kanzure> Anybody know Larry Christianse? 19:26 < Splicer> percent: yes, kanzure: no 19:29 < Splicer> monkeys have a cool retrovirus called PtERV... some monkeys eons ago were infected with it numerous times... so chimps have like 150 copies of it now, partially written over eachother. 19:29 < percent> It says here that uracil "usually" takes the place of thyamine in in RNA. 19:29 < percent> Always or usually? 19:29 < percent> *thymine 19:30 < Splicer> i think it always works the same way in the same organism.. but that organisms can be different 19:36 < percent> Let's say I want to make a sample of one and only one type of bacteria. How would I do that? 19:37 < kanzure> Hrm. 19:37 < kanzure> Safety procedures might be able to detail that. Purification can be difficult, from what I hear. 19:37 < kanzure> I think a good way to do it might be flamethrowers / flaming an entire chamber that you plan to use. 19:38 < percent> Biohacking involves FLAMETHROWERS? 19:38 < percent> best subculture ever 19:40 < percent> So I have a clean chamber, what then? 19:41 < Splicer> start with one bacteria maybe.. i don't know how much they spontaneously mutate 19:42 < percent> And how do I go about isolating one specific bacteria? 19:43 < kanzure> You usually don't. Most of the protocols out on the internet might help. Lots of people assume you just buy from some company that has something like nine 9's of purity. 19:44 < percent> Sounds expensive. 19:44 < kanzure> Yes. That's why I'm building the damn bioreactor-kit-toolbox-thing. 19:44 < kanzure> Buy it once, let it self-replicate. 19:45 < percent> I bet they'd sue you for that. 19:45 < percent> Can you copyright bacteria? 19:45 < kanzure> Who the hell cares? 19:45 < kanzure> I mean, what are they going to do? 19:45 < kanzure> "ERROR! ILLEGAL LIFEFORM DETECTED." 19:45 < kanzure> Really? 19:46 < percent> Depending on who finds us. 19:46 < Splicer> but how important is the purity thing?... can't I just set plasmids to random collections of E Coli and see what sticks? 19:46 < percent> They'll either just kill you or sue you. Or not even pay attention. 19:46 < percent> I should read more about plasmids. Is e. coli an important model organism? 19:46 < kanzure> Yes. 19:47 < kanzure> And yeast. 19:47 < percent> E. coli is easy enough to find, no? 19:47 < kanzure> You shit them out. 19:47 < kanzure> Wait. 19:48 < kanzure> Yeah, okay. Yes, you shit them. 19:48 < percent> ..is there any less disgusting way of procuring samples? 19:48 < Splicer> yes 19:48 < kanzure> oh, many :) 19:49 < kanzure> http://www.ecolirep.umn.edu/ecoliisolation.shtml 19:49 < percent> I see PCR is involved 19:49 < percent> PCR is about the most important thing ever, is this true? 19:50 < kanzure> PCR? 19:50 < kanzure> I don't see it on that page. 19:50 < percent> rep-PCR 19:51 < kanzure> ? 19:51 < percent> Top of the page. 19:53 < Splicer> kanzure... i wrote something about gov supevision of biohacking today... it's been on my mind, could you just read it and say whay you think? 19:53 < Splicer> http://www.biopunk.org/thoughts-on-public-perception-and-politics-t39.html 19:53 < percent> I'd wanted to ask about that. 19:53 < percent> What will the public think of underground genetic engineering? 19:53 < Splicer> i'm gonna get shit now I think 19:54 < Splicer> they're gonna hate it 19:54 < kanzure> percent: http://synbiosafe.eu/forum/ 19:54 < percent> We'll be demonized. 19:54 < percent> Nothing we're not used to though, as hackers in general. 19:55 < percent> I, however, don't give a damn what the public thinks of science. 19:55 < kanzure> Yawn. 19:55 < kanzure> Anybody who sleeps with women is a biohacker. 19:55 < percent> 95% of them want a presidential debate on science. 100% of scientists want the politicians to shut up and not tell them what to do. 19:58 < kanzure> I posted. 19:58 < kanzure> http://www.biopunk.org/post111.html#p111 20:00 < Splicer> i agree... i thought you'd give me shit for that.. thanks 20:02 < Splicer> next topic 20:03 < kanzure> hm? 20:07 < Splicer> (the notion that some form of supervision probably has to be endured) 20:08 < kanzure> yes, I should have given you shit for that 20:08 < kanzure> :) 20:08 < kanzure> you're right 20:09 < Splicer> ;) 20:20 < kanzure> hehe 20:20 < kanzure> Tony said to me, "(2008-06-08 19:24:05) Tony: I'd suggest relabeling "singularity" before you look for serious money. 20:20 < kanzure> What you are really talking about is breaking the one brain one lifespan limit to the growth of intelligence." 20:23 < Splicer> ? 20:24 < nsh> second line is still Tony's words? 20:24 < kanzure> yes 20:26 < Splicer> very transhuman 20:29 < kanzure> Maybe I can get him in here some time. 20:29 < percent> Who's this tony? 20:29 < kanzure> I met him a few years ago on the net by randomly clicking through Wikipedia. 20:30 < kanzure> http://meme.com.au/ his page is not representative of what he's thinking about 20:30 < nsh> what's he thinking about? 20:32 < Splicer> not my kink 20:32 < percent> So you're all pretty much transhumanists? 20:32 < Splicer> i'm not 20:33 < kanzure> I don't think most everybody here likes labels all that much. I'd say that a significant number of ideas are strikingly similar. 20:33 < kanzure> nsh: still trying to get to the root of it all 20:34 * nsh is just transhuman 20:34 < nsh> , glib 20:34 < percent> Care to explain? 20:36 * nsh suspects that he respects wolfram too much 20:36 < nsh> hmm? 20:37 < nsh> ben goertzel does a good job of explaining (some of the reasons) wolfram is an idiot^W^Wover-confident of his own importance 20:38 < kanzure> oh really? 20:38 < kanzure> can you link? 20:38 < kanzure> nsh: re: just transhuman, that's a good way to put it. 20:38 < kanzure> Wolfram has been known to be overly self-absorbed, and if Goertzel has a good way of saying it, :) 20:38 * kanzure knows Ben's son 20:38 < Splicer> I see myself as a biopunk, when I look at the world I see evolution and natural selection. 20:38 < kanzure> or at least one of them 20:39 < nsh> htttp://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2002/WolframReview.htm and a few other pages on that site 20:42 < kanzure> thank you :) 20:43 < kanzure> ' Wolfram’s Principle of Computational Universality does contain a very deep insight, one going beyond standard universal computation theory, which is: Almost any dynamical system that doesn't lead to random or transparently fixed or oscillatory behavior, is likely to be a universal computer. ' 20:43 < kanzure> heh 20:45 < nsh> ironically, that statement is itself a little misleading: such systems are only potential universal computers. actually implementing universal computation within such systems would require much stronger requirements 20:47 < nsh> really, wolfram showed that the complexity of ruleset required before computation can be embedded within a large enough parameter space is lower than was originally considered 20:48 < nsh> but control of parameters is not such a simple thing when you're not running a simulation 20:48 < nsh> and goertzel's arguments about efficiency are poignant and completely unaddressed by wolfram 20:48 < procto> I used to think #swhack would get dense at times, but it was well within easy grokking limits 20:49 < procto> it's nice to see the density can increase substantially 20:49 < kanzure> What's #swhack? 20:49 < Splicer> who's dense? 20:50 < procto> another freenode chan 20:50 < procto> density of information 20:50 < Splicer> thanks 21:04 < kanzure> I don't understand. 21:05 * nsh is not responsible, only culpable 21:05 < Splicer> ....swhack is a zoo 21:05 < kanzure> but really 21:05 < Splicer> hehehe 21:06 < nsh> #swhack is publically logged... 21:07 < Splicer> wow 21:07 < kanzure> http://swhack.com/ makes sense 21:07 < kanzure> but the channel doesn't 21:09 < nsh> a certain times, perhaps 21:09 < nsh> *at 21:10 < kanzure> it looks like the idea is to randomly generate stuff to prep the mind 21:10 < kanzure> but this is just Enki-2's xsublism 21:10 < kanzure> *xsublims 21:10 < nsh> oh? 21:12 < Splicer> that was one of your first questions 'are you all bots?' 21:13 < kanzure> heh :) 21:13 -!- Phreedom [n=freedom@www.online.dn.ua] has joined #hplusroadmap 21:20 < kanzure> So, nsh is a bot. 21:21 < nsh> how would you measure the complexity of mistaken detail. 21:22 < Splicer> i'm just a sexy girl 21:22 < kanzure> yep 21:25 < nsh> kanzure: Discordianism is a modern religion centered on the idea that chaos is as important as order. 21:26 < kanzure> Ah, so are these discords of the order of nonorder? 21:27 < Splicer> 21:28 < nsh> the ratio order-in-disorder to disorder-in-order is itself amenable to reordering 21:28 < Splicer> it's divisible by 5 is it not? 21:29 < nsh> would have to be, i assume 21:29 < Splicer> i liked RAW 21:30 < kanzure> Keep the bullshit in there. 21:30 < kanzure> Not in here. 21:31 < nsh> Robert Anton Wilson, wrote the illuminatus trilogy and other reasonably popular fiction, as well as some pretty good nonfiction 21:31 < nsh> Prometheus Rising probably the most noted, if not notable 21:48 < wrldpc> I read Illuminatus! 21:48 < wrldpc> Some novel ideas ... dolphin allies and so on ... private submarines. 21:48 < wrldpc> Don't know who had the telepathic dolphin idea first, RAW or Gibson. 21:50 < Splicer> RAW was ironic 21:50 < nsh> Gregory Bateson 21:51 < nsh> (he studied dolphin communication and worked with John C. Lilly on a project to teach dolpins human language) 21:52 < nsh> the real experiment would be trying to teach humans dolphin language 21:57 < Splicer> Wilson was my entry to the skeptics 21:59 < nsh> he certainly hid the fact that he was a ranking member of the freemasons incredibly well 22:00 < Splicer> was he? hehehe 22:00 -!- xp_prg2 [n=knoppix@c-67-169-126-205.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 22:01 < Splicer> It's not so easy to know with him. 22:15 -!- Vedestin [n=Vedestin@d122-109-35-58.sbr3.nsw.optusnet.com.au] has joined #hplusroadmap 22:22 < Splicer> nite 22:22 -!- Splicer [n=p@h87n1c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has quit [] 22:48 < percent> wait, who's talking about Robert Anton Wilson 22:48 < percent> I'm currently reading Schroedinger's Cat 23:13 -!- Netsplit zelazny.freenode.net <-> irc.freenode.net quits: kanzure 23:17 < wrldpc> nice 23:17 < wrldpc> haven't read that yet 23:20 -!- kanzure [n=bryan@cpe-70-113-54-112.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 23:20 -!- kanzure [n=bryan@cpe-70-113-54-112.austin.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)] 23:21 -!- kanzure [n=bryan@cpe-70-113-54-112.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 23:37 < kanzure> Is it possible to screw up cooking raman noodles? 23:51 < Vedestin> yeah 23:51 < Vedestin> you can boil them dry 23:51 < Vedestin> and burn them