--- Day changed Thu Jul 24 2008 00:17 < ybit> oh yeah, back 00:17 * ybit makes a note not to annoy others with his status on IRC 00:20 < kanzure> hm? 00:36 < ybit> it´s annoying for others and for myself 00:39 -!- kanzure [i=bryan@66.112.232.74] has quit ["Leaving."] 00:46 -!- kanzure [i=bryan@66.112.232.74] has joined #hplusroadmap 02:26 -!- willPow3r [n=will@cpe-66-75-6-181.san.res.rr.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 03:03 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/egan.html quantification of the problem 03:43 -!- willPow3r [n=will@cpe-66-75-6-181.san.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 05:07 -!- Splicer [n=p@h124n1c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has quit [] 06:21 -!- jm [n=jm@p57B9FD0C.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:56 -!- Democritus [n=ard@c-68-49-79-239.hsd1.md.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 09:04 < kanzure> http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Design 09:04 < kanzure> from my inbox today, someone from that site contacted me 09:20 < kanzure> yep, I'm impressed 12:36 < ybit> http://www.lumenlab.com/ 12:36 < ybit> link courtesy of Phreedom 12:37 < ybit> http://www.lumenlab.com/robotics/ - all the parts only cost around $500 13:11 < fenn> hype 13:16 < ybit> ah, less than $2000 13:16 < ybit> fenn: why do you say that? 13:16 < fenn> more importantly, it's made up of rods like a printer 13:17 < fenn> try machining some aluminum with a printer carriage and see what happens 13:18 < fenn> it might work on wood, but slowly 13:21 < fenn> also i dont see any electronics to run the servos 13:22 < fenn> its like they just threw a bunch of stuff in a box without seeing if it would actually work 17:42 < fenn> hmm. diaspora is starting to read like a lecture on 5-dimensional physics 17:45 < kanzure> I first encountered it when I was 12 17:45 < kanzure> didn't like it much 17:45 < kanzure> while the idea is "of course" and nice that he tried, eh 17:50 < fenn> "if there are known effects, doesn't this render the whole damn map pointless? The map is not the territory, but if you "know" the territory, then why the hell have the map?" 17:50 < fenn> they didnt know the results of all possible combinations (points on the map) 17:51 < fenn> i got the impression that some parts of the map were more thoroughly sampled than others 17:53 < kanzure> so perhaps it's to the point where it's "roughly mapped" 17:53 < kanzure> I'm pretty sure that we somewhat have Egan's map with Google Mouse, but there needs to be some way to record something about the brains that the SNP data produces :-) 17:53 < kanzure> if this ends up being just some natural language the brain supposedly inputs into the system, so be it :-( (mostly useless) 17:54 < fenn> honestly the google mouse looks like a bunch of colored squiggles to me 17:54 < kanzure> the idea or implementation 17:54 < kanzure> basically Google Mouse can also be the ABA Brain Explorer (my implementation) so it's 3D and showing cortices and so on 17:54 < kanzure> does your comment still apply in that context ? 17:55 < fenn> it doesn't show the relationship between physical structure and behavior/functionality 17:56 < kanzure> correct 17:56 < fenn> then what does it show? 17:56 < kanzure> it was going to be a 'scaffold' where I could somehow constrain my research 17:56 < kanzure> i.e., tag some possible avenues for research 17:56 < kanzure> if there's a statistical correlation between some genes and some perceived functionality, then that would be relevant to search for, no? 17:56 < fenn> right 17:57 < kanzure> but there's still no way to do this functionality mapping 17:57 < kanzure> argh 17:57 < kanzure> worst case scenario it's just random measurements from lab testing 17:57 < fenn> but a realtionship between some gene and functionality doesn't have any bearing on your map (haha) 17:57 < kanzure> "ok, does the brain respond to theta waves ... does it respond to amphetamine ... make the following measurements ..." 17:57 < kanzure> that's true 17:57 < kanzure> epistasis and such 17:58 < kanzure> I was hoping that could be sorted out by the massive statistical aspect of the thing ... if you have a few SNP datasets and measurements from each of the brains, that could get useful, no? 17:58 * kanzure doesn't know if 1k is enough to sort out that many damn variables 17:58 < kanzure> and /me admits how nasty a hack this is 17:59 < kanzure> I was going to email Greg and yell at him about it 17:59 < kanzure> but I don't know if he'll have any ideas 17:59 < fenn> you could correlate genotype with phenotype (the google map) and use that to infer a relationship between gene and physical shape, which would link to gene/function studies (i think i need to rephrase this sentence) 17:59 < kanzure> well I thought the issue with that would be multiply confluencing genes 17:59 < kanzure> polymerase without helicase just isn't the same 18:00 < fenn> but it's not n! combinations either 18:00 < kanzure> heh 18:00 < kanzure> oh, right 18:00 < kanzure> the lab above me was doing giant correlational studies with yeast 18:00 < kanzure> the same could be done for brain circuits 18:00 < kanzure> i.e., Marcotte was isolating the genetic regulatory networks 18:00 < kanzure> http://reactome.org/ 18:01 < kanzure> so he had the entire yeast knockout library frozen in a few fridges upstairs 18:02 < kanzure> so how does one describe phenotype anyway? 18:02 < fenn> that's some interesting javascript 18:02 < kanzure> I remember in my first biology class ever, the first week, I was assigned the task of writing down descriptions of little critters in jars 18:02 < kanzure> probably filled with formaldehyde or something 18:02 < kanzure> formalin, whatever 18:02 < kanzure> anyway, being the way that I am, 18:02 < kanzure> I neglected to write down "arm, leg" and such because I just thought that it wasn't all that scientific approach to phenotypic descriptions 18:03 < kanzure> so I went hardcore with "projection from the 5th millimeter of the upper extremity" 18:03 < kanzure> of course I failed miserably, but the idea applies here 18:03 < fenn> well, insects dont really have arms 18:04 < kanzure> :) 18:04 < kanzure> exactly 18:04 < fenn> just a bunch of differently shaped plates 18:04 < kanzure> these things aren't really 'legs' even though they have correlated functions 18:04 < fenn> arm or leg is really a functional description 18:04 < kanzure> which seems to be more .. ethology, perhaps 18:06 < fenn> reactome.org is really impressive 18:06 < kanzure> I agree. 18:07 < kanzure> haven't gotten around to digesting the whole thing yet 18:07 < fenn> heh there's a lot of nodes to digest 18:09 < kanzure> well, I refer to the framework as well 18:09 < kanzure> how they are doing this 18:11 < kanzure> so the phenotypic description of wtf the brain is doing 18:11 < kanzure> let's magically assume we have a way to describe the function of the brain 18:11 < kanzure> could this information be routed back into the map in a constructive way ? 18:13 < fenn> yes, with physical "knockout" studies (lesions) 18:13 < fenn> but i dont see a whole lot of value in that 18:14 < kanzure> wasn't this what enki-2 was saying .. "since we can't say it, let's just specify everything that isn't right, and do it in prolog" 18:14 < kanzure> there were some objections to that method in a logic/computational context for something else 18:14 < kanzure> psychometrics are out of the question I think 18:14 < fenn> aroo? i mean burn some cells at a specific location and see what the functional effect is 18:14 < kanzure> or molecular lesions btw 18:15 < fenn> hrm. molecular things are so much easier to directly correlate to genes 18:16 < fenn> psychometrics is the same as your magical functional description 18:16 < kanzure> psychometrics uses that layer of grammar and natural language though 18:16 < kanzure> it fits, yes, but 18:17 < fenn> not entirely.. there's a lot of abstractions, like what does IQ represent 18:17 < fenn> "it represents G, the general intelligence factor!" 18:17 < fenn> whoopee 18:17 < kanzure> variables dependent on the organism's function during a very particular context for "IQ testing" 18:18 < fenn> but they're aiming for a context independent measurement 18:19 < kanzure> let's not use IQ, that has a lot of baggage 18:19 < kanzure> can you make the point with another variable/abstraction? 18:19 < fenn> ok, i dont know any other psychometric tests 18:19 < kanzure> Stroop attentional task 18:19 < kanzure> it's where you read the color of a word that represents another color 18:19 < kanzure> "red" but it's in blue 18:19 < fenn> ok 18:19 < kanzure> and the measurement is something like hit to miss ratio 18:19 < fenn> seems like its measuring some kind of cross talk 18:20 < fenn> is that a function? 18:20 < kanzure> hm? 18:20 < kanzure> is what a function, crosstalk? 18:20 < fenn> yeah 18:20 < kanzure> sure, why not 18:20 < kanzure> that would be good to have on a map, if it exists 18:20 < kanzure> dunno if the stroop test is measuring it ... that would be better suited for fMRI or something 18:21 < fenn> semantic cross talk, not necessarily electrical 18:21 < kanzure> definitely not necessarily electrical 18:22 < kanzure> maybe my framing is off 18:22 < kanzure> I've been considering some other possible scenarios 18:22 < kanzure> for instance, just mapping *people* on to the map 18:22 < kanzure> and saying "go look at kanzure for this" 18:22 < kanzure> pointers/refs 18:22 < fenn> sure, each person is a combination of many functions in varying degrees 18:22 < kanzure> doesn't really help do anything though ... 18:23 < fenn> you could decompose them into basis functions with enough samples 18:23 < kanzure> yeah, how many? 18:23 < fenn> a lot 18:23 < kanzure> "a lot" is a *shit* load, probably 18:23 < kanzure> consider the trillions of synapses 18:23 < kanzure> and 20,000 brain-related genes 18:23 < fenn> well, you dont have to get a 100% complete map 18:24 < fenn> its like a hypercube, most of the volume is in the corners 18:24 < kanzure> okay, so let's talk about nematodes instead 18:24 < kanzure> 100 neurons, right? 18:24 < fenn> but as long as you map the central region you have a good idea what a hypercube looks like 18:24 < fenn> what functionality does a nematode brain provide? 18:25 < kanzure> someone in the torrent-vid that nsh hated yesterday, has been layering neurons on top of silicon circuit paths and testing the neurons individual with different wirings and connections .. using the surface as a scaffold, then listening to their conversations 18:25 < kanzure> dunno ... surely it's doing something 18:25 < fenn> that's a good idea 18:25 < fenn> better than poking at them with syringes :P 18:25 < kanzure> different silicon patterns for different networks 18:25 < kanzure> yeah, realy 18:25 < kanzure> *really 18:26 < fenn> its sorts like an inverse nanobot 18:26 < fenn> instead of nanobots swarming into the rigid structure of the brain, you have brain cells swarm into the rigid structure of a microchip 18:27 < kanzure> layered the paths with some sort of food for the neurons to grow on 18:27 < kanzure> perhaps it was hormone or something 18:28 < kanzure> out of all of the things that you can say about the brain, what's the most general? 18:28 < kanzure> (yet still correct/sayable) 18:28 < fenn> um, pass 18:28 < kanzure> heh 18:28 < kanzure> I'm still on the phenotype question 18:28 < kanzure> clearly the brain is passing information about itself to others 18:29 < kanzure> thus we have our 'memes' hypothesis 18:29 < kanzure> ideas/thoughts and the like. 18:29 < fenn> that has nothing to do with nematodes 18:29 < kanzure> but it's by no means rigid 18:29 < kanzure> hrm 18:29 < fenn> i was thinking something like 'responds to its environment' or 'responds to stimulus' 18:29 < fenn> but then i got lost in semantics 18:30 < kanzure> any observation that we record of its response is psychometric testing, no? 18:30 < kanzure> like "it wiggles (only) left" 18:31 < kanzure> and then what's "wiggle" ? 18:31 < kanzure> hurray for semantics 18:32 < fenn> brain is much faster than most single-cell control mechanisms, i think that's why it evolved 18:32 < fenn> "something's biting my tail, get it off me!" 18:33 < fenn> or for controlling circulatory system pumps where chemical diffusion isn't fast enough 18:34 < fenn> actually they do use sodium/potassium diffusion but it's phase locked 18:35 < kanzure> ultimately we do have the instruments to measure variables about brains, particularly look at patch clamp or the neurons-on-a-chip stuff, 18:35 < kanzure> btu we can't ask 20,000 users to slice open their heads, build these instruments, and make the measurements 18:37 < fenn> bah i hate google 18:37 < kanzure> neurofeedback is interesting because it allows the user to isolate an internal variable ... many people claim to be able to control their pulse quite easily with the proper equipment, and then some training and soon enough they don't have to use the equipment any more. 18:37 < fenn> sure why not 18:38 < kanzure> I was thinking of the natural language / psychology problem here with semantis 18:38 < kanzure> and I figure that it's like trying to draw somethng through a damn pin hole 18:38 < fenn> ah so you have an objective quantity to measure with an instrument 18:38 < kanzure> but having that neurofeedback component isolates an internal variable and can bring it to the forefront of attention 18:38 < kanzure> yes 18:39 < fenn> so hopefully some people will be able to do this and others won't, and that means something? 18:39 < kanzure> or the range of numbers they can generate perhaps? 18:39 < kanzure> would that be useful? 18:39 * kanzure is afraid of the possibility of a lack of interesting measurements 18:40 < fenn> dunno, maybe if the isolated variable has some effect on magical semantic 'functionality' 18:40 < kanzure> s/generate/control/ 18:40 < fenn> what are you going for exactly? 18:40 < fenn> end-goal 18:40 < kanzure> extraction of phenotype-variables 18:40 < kanzure> and their values 18:40 < fenn> why? 18:40 < kanzure> to map on top of Google Mouse/earth 18:40 < fenn> why? 18:41 < fenn> :) 18:41 < kanzure> mostly to constrain my own research to figure out what areas to attack attention at 18:41 < kanzure> that was what it originally started out as 18:41 < kanzure> I have all of this information, but it's pretty useless 18:41 < fenn> say you finally invented the magical attention pill, what would you do with it? 18:42 < kanzure> use it 18:42 < kanzure> it's not a pill btw, it's more like a health monitoring system 18:42 < kanzure> think of galaga except on steroids to destroy destractions automatically so you can continue working uninterrupted :-) 18:42 < fenn> how do you determine what's a distraction? 18:43 < kanzure> I don't even know what a 'distraction' is in terms of the brain or signals/noise 18:43 < kanzure> whatever it is, it stops me from doing really awesome work 18:43 < fenn> the way i see it, when you're doing research, each answer opens up ten more questions.. which of those questions are distractions and which are important? 18:43 < kanzure> s/work/stuff/ 18:44 < kanzure> don't know if that's the right way to put it 18:44 < kanzure> the way that distractions work for me are quite weird 18:45 < kanzure> it's not a matter of useless research -- that's bound to happen anyway methinks unless you get more keen at selection -- it's like running through a program and not following it through to completion 18:47 < kanzure> blah, you have me quite off track now 18:48 < fenn> its hard to finish projects when you dont have a specific end state 18:48 < kanzure> btw, a good solution to the Mouse problem is to just leave the instrumentation question open 18:48 < kanzure> sure 18:48 < kanzure> *open and extendable by other programmers 18:53 < kanzure> actually the idea wasn't so much 'attention' as it was whatever I mentioned on humancortex.html 18:53 < kanzure> I think the way I worded it was 'system administrator's guide to the brain" or not so much guide as framework for dealing with it 18:53 < kanzure> distraction-elimination would be one technique to employ, should it ever end up with an actual technique 18:54 < kanzure> so in a sense it could be said that the Mouse/map thing could be used as a way to figure out what possible 'internal variables from that pinhole to draw through' and methods of dealing with them are possible 18:54 < kanzure> it's easy to say in words, but not the implementation methinks 18:54 < kanzure> EEG/MRI/neurofeedback on the sysadmin side of things 18:55 < kanzure> but again, finding easy variables to isolate from users? ehh ... 19:03 < kanzure> sounds kinda useless 19:04 < kanzure> but it's somewhat based off of the distinction between nearterm (me) versus longterm (something less fucked in the long run than I am) http://heybryan.org/recursion.html 19:04 < kanzure> and buildingbrains.html 19:04 * kanzure goes to eat 19:20 < kanzure> Heh. 19:20 < kanzure> hearing terrible tales of compiler errors from across the tables 19:20 < kanzure> awesome. 19:23 -!- Splicer [n=p@h208n2c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 19:27 < ybit> sounds like fun 19:27 < ybit> referring to geek speak 19:57 < kanzure> fenn: http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Design 20:09 < kanzure> hm 20:09 < kanzure> phase-sensitive optical low coherence reflectometery? http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=12&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.opticsexpress.org%2Fviewmedia.cfm%3Furi%3Doe-12-11-2377%26seq%3D0&ei=QBiJSJOLDqjeigGDj7zSDA&usg=AFQjCNFizM-n14E1yRHQHVfg6fT5cJb4Xg&sig2=WeSUyJPuAdjmux-KNaTXEA 20:09 < kanzure> aka backscattered light upon action potentials 20:09 < kanzure> this is another one picked up from whatever the hell it is that Superkuh is up to 20:10 < kanzure> R. U. Maheswari, H. Takaoka, H. Kadono, R. Homma, and M. Tanifuji, “Novel functional imaging technique 20:10 < kanzure> from brain surface with optical coherence tomography enabling visualization of depth resolved functional 20:10 < kanzure> structure in vivo,” J. Neuroscience Methods 124, 83-92 (2003). 20:10 < kanzure> Now doesn't that sound promising? 20:11 < kanzure> T. Akkin, “Biomedical applications of a fiber based low-coherence interferometer for quantitative differential phase measurements,” Dissertation: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, (2003). 20:13 < kanzure> Rapid mechanical changes were reported in the garfish olfactory nerve using a stylus recording device fastened to a piezoceramic bender [6,7]. The recorded swelling signal and 20:13 < kanzure> aha, that's why he's looking for the Tasaki paper 20:13 < kanzure> finding this one might be interesting: K. Iwasa, and I. Tasaki, “Mechanical changes in squid giant axons associated with production of action potentials,” Biochem. Biophysic. Res. Comm. 95, 1328-1331 (1980). 20:17 < fenn> reminds me of flanagan's neurophone 20:22 < kanzure> interesting idea 20:22 < kanzure> does it .. work? 20:22 * kanzure was reading http://www.neurophone.com/tech.htm 20:40 -!- jm [n=jm@p57B9FD0C.dip.t-dialin.net] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 21:23 < fenn> hmm they changed their story.. used to be claiming that you could send information down ordinary tactile-sense nerves and it would be decoded as audio by the brain 21:24 < fenn> he started out using high voltage pads you stuck to your thigh or palm or whatever 21:25 < fenn> then they figured out that the high voltage would cause the skin to deform like a piezo actuator, so they tried it with piezo's and got the same result 21:25 < fenn> the claim used to be that even nerve-deaf people could hear with it 21:52 < kanzure> odd :) 22:25 < ybit> next year, aarpa can do my taxes 22:25 < ybit> ick 22:25 < ybit> that´s been on the to-do list for awhile now :P 22:26 < ybit> have any of you read neverness? 22:26 < ybit> that´s on the todo list 22:26 < ybit> fenn, i´m guessing since that it´s on your sever you have read the book? 22:27 < ybit> aarp*.. 22:33 < kanzure> ybit: I've read it. 22:33 < kanzure> I'm the one recommending it to all of you :) 22:47 < fenn> ybit: just finished it 22:47 < fenn> uh, i think he covered all the bases :) 22:48 < kanzure> who? 22:48 < fenn> egan 22:48 < kanzure> neverness is zindell 22:48 < fenn> ah whoops a bit of selective blindness on my part, sorry 22:48 < kanzure> but still, that's what I was wondering 22:49 < kanzure> you might have meant "bryan covered the bases by saying he's the one recommending it" 22:49 < fenn> ok, i just finished diaspora 22:51 < fenn> shooting people with introdus would make a great "non-violent" video game 23:10 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:11:26) kanzure: Hey. 23:10 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:11:32) Carissa: hello 23:10 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:11:41) Carissa: it works? 23:10 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:12:23) Carissa: it took me forever to figure out why this thing wouldn't work 23:10 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:12:46) Carissa: oh? were not on pidgin are we???????????/// 23:11 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:12:51) Carissa has left the conversation. 23:11 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:14:11) kanzure: I'm on pidgin, but you might not be. 23:11 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:14:28) Carissa: it doesn't say i am 23:11 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:14:36) kanzure: Are you in gmail? 23:11 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:14:49) Carissa: no i'm on theinternet 23:11 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:14:58) kanzure: You're in gmail. 23:11 < kanzure> (2008-07-24 22:15:01) Carissa: no 23:11 < kanzure> How cute. 23:15 < fenn> uh, check your clock? 23:17 < fenn> "Aromantic asexual. And atheist! Triple A rating!" 23:17 < kanzure> wtf 23:18 < kanzure> my clock is wrong? 23:18 < kanzure> also, the p2pfoundation guy did Technocalyps, nsh 23:18 < kanzure> what an odd coincidence 23:19 < fenn> either that, or an insidious conspiracy 23:19 < kanzure> insidious conspiracy for 200 please 23:21 < fenn> your answer: "The richest collection of free modes available anywhere in the net and on the planet." 23:21 < fenn> what was the question? 23:24 < kanzure> where arez teh porns? 23:26 < fenn> http://thehomebased.com/?p=28 23:27 < fenn> i still can't figure out the 12th pic 23:28 < kanzure> what an oddly specific answer :-) 23:28 < kanzure> conspiracy! 23:41 < ybit> kanzure: haha, i´m assuming the above was an excerpt from you and your little sis ^^ 23:42 < ybit> argh, i am indeed getting tired, hopefully i´ll get my provigil soon 23:42 < kanzure> yes, Carissa is she 23:42 < ybit> my mum just mentioning going to dubai, india for a vacation o_O 23:43 < ybit> i wouldn´t mind at all, but when she realizes that ´dubail´ is india, she´ll change her mind quickly 23:43 < kanzure> my mom's evil twin (or is that the other way around) was living in India a few years after living in Taiwan, China, Spain, England, all sorts of assbackwards places. 23:43 < ybit> that´s cool, but spain and england aren´t assbackwards :) 23:43 < kanzure> on the contrary 23:44 < kanzure> ever take a dump in England? 23:44 < kanzure> in a toilet 23:44 < ybit> lol 23:44 < ybit> i have not 23:44 < kanzure> exactly 23:44 < ybit> lol 23:44 < ybit> but i know people who have (besides you) :) 23:44 < kanzure> I haven't. 23:44 < ybit> they don´t have backwards asses 23:45 < ybit> heh 23:45 < kanzure> backwards arses 23:45 < kanzure> fine 23:45 < ybit> getting english on me are you? 23:45 < kanzure> i bloody well ought to 23:45 < ybit> i´m tasked with choosing a vacation resort 23:45 < kanzure> Austin, Texas. 23:46 < kanzure> or Bloomington, Indiana and you can bug fenn 23:46 * ybit looks for resorts in spain 23:47 < ybit> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Seaside_resorts 23:48 < ybit> bah 23:48 < ybit> spain doesn´t have any nice resorts 23:49 < kanzure> I think I'll give up on attention 23:49 < kanzure> bullshit idea anyway