--- Log opened Thu May 25 00:00:11 2023 01:34 -!- darsie [~darsie@84-113-55-200.cable.dynamic.surfer.at] has joined #hplusroadmap 02:01 -!- Jenda [~jenda@coralmyn.hrach.eu] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 02:01 -!- Jenda [~jenda@coralmyn.hrach.eu] has joined #hplusroadmap 02:59 -!- flooded [~flooded@146-70-115-163.pool.ovpn.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 03:02 -!- test_ [flooded@gateway/vpn/protonvpn/flood/x-43489060] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 03:26 -!- TMM_ [hp@amanda.tmm.cx] has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.] 03:27 -!- TMM_ [hp@amanda.tmm.cx] has joined #hplusroadmap 06:06 < muurkha> fenn: I don't think the idea behind common crawl did fail; they have a new dataset every two months now: https://commoncrawl.org/the-data/get-started/ 06:06 < muurkha> it's not suitable for PDFs because it truncates after a megabyte or something but it's great for other things 06:08 -!- test_ [flooded@gateway/vpn/protonvpn/flood/x-43489060] has joined #hplusroadmap 06:08 -!- TMM_ [hp@amanda.tmm.cx] has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.] 06:09 -!- TMM_ [hp@amanda.tmm.cx] has joined #hplusroadmap 06:11 -!- flooded [~flooded@146-70-115-163.pool.ovpn.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 06:58 < hprmbridge> kanzure> It would seem that Amjad is not aware of Vorick's human financialization scheme https://twitter.com/amasad/status/1661627266953252865 06:59 < hprmbridge> kanzure> here are some transcripts from SynBioBeta this year https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/synbiobeta/2023/ 07:58 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 08:09 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:13 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has left #hplusroadmap [] 08:14 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:22 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has left #hplusroadmap [] 08:23 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:32 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has left #hplusroadmap [Error from remote client] 08:33 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:36 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has left #hplusroadmap [] 08:37 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:39 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has left #hplusroadmap [] 08:41 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:43 -!- Guest55 [~Guest55@196.127.35.142] has joined #hplusroadmap 09:17 -!- flooded [~flooded@146-70-115-163.pool.ovpn.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 09:21 -!- test_ [flooded@gateway/vpn/protonvpn/flood/x-43489060] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 09:32 -!- Guest55 [~Guest55@196.127.35.142] has quit [Quit: Client closed] 09:56 < alethkit> Is Amjad trying to recreate a financialized version of filial piety? 10:05 < kanzure> the vorick scheme is to use a type of funding model where the organization gets funded by selling a token, and families get funded to raise a child in a vertically integrated facility (or not-- could be outside the system), and then the person grows up and works and with 10% of their salary for the 1st 10 years of labor they buy up the tokens on the market 10:05 < kanzure> thus creating an incentive to buy into the scheme 10:08 < alethkit> What's the advantage of such a scheme wrt transactions costs as opposed to having a functioning social fabric? 10:11 < L29Ah> sounds like slavery 10:50 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has left #hplusroadmap [] 11:16 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has joined #hplusroadmap 11:19 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has left #hplusroadmap [] 11:37 < hprmbridge> kanzure> we're all slaves, man, to reality. 12:26 -!- test_ [flooded@gateway/vpn/protonvpn/flood/x-43489060] has joined #hplusroadmap 12:29 -!- flooded [~flooded@146-70-115-163.pool.ovpn.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 14:31 -!- mlaga97_ [~quassel@user/mlaga97] has joined #hplusroadmap 14:37 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: faceface, mlaga97 14:51 -!- L29Ah [~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah] has joined #hplusroadmap 15:04 -!- Netsplit over, joins: faceface 15:16 < jrayhawk> there are no hard definitional boundaries between citizenship and slavery; "slavery" is a moral-affect-association term of rhetoric rather than a disciplined one 15:17 < jrayhawk> similar to "cult" vs. "religion" and "populism" vs. "democracy" 15:17 < L29Ah> sounds very usanian 15:17 < L29Ah> but yeah sure 15:20 < jrayhawk> fnord 15:26 < jrayhawk> https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/11/04/ethnic-tension-and-meaningless-arguments/ 15:26 * L29Ah is triggered by links to SSC 15:29 < jrayhawk> fnord fnord fnord 15:35 -!- flooded [flooded@gateway/vpn/protonvpn/flood/x-43489060] has joined #hplusroadmap 15:37 < alethkit> jrayhawk: I mean, one could define it as labour compulsed under the threat of force 15:39 -!- test_ [flooded@gateway/vpn/protonvpn/flood/x-43489060] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 15:51 < jrayhawk> and how do you intend to eat without exposing yourself to the threat of force via taxation law? 15:58 < jrayhawk> in the U.S., for instance, an average of 13% to 15% of labour is compelled. 15:59 < hprmbridge> kanzure> what amount of education is compelled 15:59 < alethkit> I mean, one can grow their own food 15:59 < alethkit> slavery is a useful term for mutual communication 16:00 < alethkit> One can always nitpick any given word in the English language, but linguistic meaning is fundamentally based on use 16:00 < jrayhawk> on land you intend to access without exposing yourself to compulsion how? 16:01 < alethkit> With the power of friendship, of course! 16:01 < jrayhawk> yes, and "slavery" is semantically "citizenship i don't like" 16:01 < hprmbridge> kanzure> neuralink now has a human investigational use exemption https://twitter.com/neuralink/status/1661857379460468736 16:01 < alethkit> jrayhawk: Well, except for the bit where that meaning is not commonly in use 16:02 < jrayhawk> it is the only use 16:02 < jrayhawk> your idea is that you can avoid compulsion by externalizing it to somebody else 16:02 < alethkit> kanzure: Oh, they can run experiments now! Can't wait to see the reaction of Twitter 16:03 < alethkit> jrayhawk: No, my idea is that there is a term in use to describe a given mode of anthropological relations that is useful to compare similarities across societies 16:05 < jrayhawk> okay, well, give me a definition of it that clearly distinguishes it from citizenship, then, rather than just a fnord 16:09 < alethkit> I mean, citizenship (to me) implies a degree of political and legal rights 16:09 < alethkit> there's also residency, which implies minimal political, but some degree of legal rights 16:09 < alethkit> and slavery would entail reduced (if any) legal rights 16:10 < jrayhawk> such as? 16:11 < jrayhawk> what right defines a citizen vs. a slave? 16:15 < Betawolf> slaves were not permitted to sell their labour to whomever they chose 16:16 < jrayhawk> same is true of citizens; the state restricts their economic relationships at its whim 16:16 < fenn> i'd like to point out that the reproduction-incentivizing token scheme is simply formalizing the pyramid scheme arrangement that has existed for millennia 16:18 < Betawolf> jrayhawk: the government creates some hurdles about the means, but does not in general stop citizens from getting jobs. 16:19 < Betawolf> slaves could not partake in this type of contract 16:20 < Betawolf> slaves also often had restrictions upon their personal property, but this varied in different locations and times 16:20 < jrayhawk> the state also places restrictions on your personal property 16:20 < jrayhawk> the state can also nullify contracts 16:21 < Betawolf> the state can do lots of things, the question is about what differentiates its treatment of slaves and citizens 16:21 < jrayhawk> yes, that is the qustion at hand 16:22 < Betawolf> and things like freedom of labour, freedom of personal property, democratic participation, those are differences 16:22 < jrayhawk> okay, so where is the boundary 16:25 < jrayhawk> re: democratic participation: the state can also rescind the ability to vote, and enter into treaties with no political representation. In many U.S. states, felons and children are unable to vote. are felons and children slaves? Are citizens of outlying territories and D.C. slaves for lack of representation? 16:26 < jrayhawk> Is everyone subject to the WTO a slave? the UN? 16:26 < fenn> amjad is missing the part where you get to opt out of the scheme if you want, but then you don't get the profits from your children and their children etc 16:27 < Betawolf> it seems like you want a 'if x, y, z, then that's slavery' definition, which is not a useful way to understand a concept that has been applied in multiple different specifics throughout history. 16:27 < jrayhawk> It can be useful to say "this is a form of citizenship I don't like"; its usefulness was not in question 16:28 < Betawolf> 'citizenship' is a much newer concept than 'slavery' 16:28 < jrayhawk> okay, i am fine with reversing my definition 16:28 < jrayhawk> citizenship is a form of slavery that you like 16:28 < Betawolf> why would you like citizenship? 16:29 < fenn> big guys with guns stop other big guys with guns from taking your stuff and/or killing you 16:29 < Betawolf> fenn: they'll do that if you're a slave, too, they want your stuff for themselves. 16:29 < jrayhawk> yeah, so far this form of slavery has worked out okay for me 16:29 < fenn> you get more stuff as a citizen than as a slave 16:30 < fenn> (usually) 16:30 < Betawolf> closer, but you can get a lot of stuff as a slave to a rich guy 16:33 < fenn> also amjad is missing the part where the community invests in young parents to enable them to have more children than they otherwise would have, literally investing like you would in stocks 16:47 < fenn> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unincorporated_Man 16:48 < fenn> "The premise is folks selling shares in their future income. Initial ownership is: person 75%, parents 20%, government 5% (there are no other taxes). People typically sell 12-15% to their university, more for other early training ... They then own less than 50%, must accept majority control over their careers and locations, and try over time to rebuy enough to regain control." 16:52 < jrayhawk> i have to buy the privilege to travel abroad, buy the privilege of driving a car, buy the privilege of building houses, buy the privilege to diagnosing and prescribing medical treatments, etc. 16:54 < hprmbridge> kanzure> apparently edge.org was an epstein front 16:54 < fenn> i'm shocked, shocked to hear that money was exchanged for clout 16:54 < hprmbridge> kanzure> who would do such a thinf 16:56 < docl> IMO a lot of stuff is bounded mostly by factors of scale rather than what people would like to define it as moralistically. like cult vs religion (small is cult, big is religion). that's not the only distinction but generally control scales poorly and this causes some of the other typical differences (religion being less tightly controlled). the control of citizens is less tight/centralized than 16:56 < docl> slaves, arguably also because tight control doesn't tend to scale 16:56 < hprmbridge> kanzure> fenn: yes it's a formalization but also a simplification where you strip out religious components to explain why you're doing the whole thing. 16:57 < jrayhawk> or, at least, scale requires a ludicrously, implausibly hard-working bureaucrat like Stalin 16:58 < fenn> i don't know any existing arrangement where a community invests in young people to have more children. is this a thing? 16:58 < hprmbridge> kanzure> there was something here about engineering mice that feel less pain, or poultry, like do the david pearce thing for real why not. 16:58 < hprmbridge> kanzure> I think organizations could be persuaded to adopt the low pain low suffering cattle stock for example. 16:58 < docl> well, doesn't the mormon church e.g. do a lot of investing in young people having children? not as a transactional arrangement though 16:59 < fenn> kanzure they'd probably rub themselves raw on cage bars or whatever 16:59 < hprmbridge> kanzure> fenn: also, china's fertility program should also fund fertile healthy people and give them fertility drugs. it increases the chances of multiples. 16:59 < hprmbridge> kanzure> Probably most improvements in fertility for the population will be coming from multiples for the foreseeable future. 17:00 < hprmbridge> kanzure> You might as well go for n+1 while you're at it. 17:00 < fenn> double is a big percentage improvement 17:00 < hprmbridge> kanzure> yes 17:01 < fenn> are twins as healthy and productive later in life as, er, singles 17:01 < fenn> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twins_(1988_film) 17:01 < hprmbridge> kanzure> not like that..... 17:05 < fenn> in the movie danny devito gets the "bad genes" and arnodl schwarzenegger gets the "good genes" (despite them being genetically identical?) but in the real world there actually is such a thing where one twin sucks up more nutrients and the other is undernourished 17:07 < jrayhawk> they're canonically fraternal twins 17:07 < jrayhawk> not identical 17:09 < fenn> "5–15% of identical twin fetuses will go on to develop TTTS" 17:09 < fenn> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin-to-twin_transfusion_syndrome 17:16 < fenn> ah this only happens with identical twins. fertility drugs typically stimulate follicles to release more eggs, so that wouldn't happen 17:28 < fenn> "51% of twins and 91% of triplets are born preterm, compared to 9.4% in singletons. 14% of twins and 41% of triplets are even born very preterm, compared to 1.7% in singletons." this results in bad effects like cerebral palsy, adhd, autism, and anxiety 19:23 < fenn> wow Marshall Brain turned into a doomer deathist, literally advocating euthanizing everyone at age 65. His most recent book is “The Doomsday Book” 19:32 < fenn> a lot of his argument boils down to: it would be a lot easier to just kill everyone than to fix the structural problems in our society 19:56 -!- masamune [~masamune@user/masamune] has joined #hplusroadmap 20:02 -!- TMM_ [hp@amanda.tmm.cx] has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.] 20:02 -!- TMM_ [hp@amanda.tmm.cx] has joined #hplusroadmap 20:21 -!- srk_ [~sorki@user/srk] has joined #hplusroadmap 20:24 -!- srk [~sorki@user/srk] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 20:24 -!- srk_ is now known as srk 21:06 -!- darsie [~darsie@84-113-55-200.cable.dynamic.surfer.at] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 21:48 < muurkha> fenn: you could argue that dowries and wedding gifts are pretty close to "a community invests in young people to have more children" 21:51 < muurkha> they don't usually get an ownership share in return though 22:07 -!- masamune [~masamune@user/masamune] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 22:17 < fenn> honestly i could never understand the direction of money flow in dowry arrangements, and wedding gifts are mostly useless crap that does nothing meaningful 22:19 < fenn> if it's just between the families of the bride and groom, that wouldn't count 22:19 < fenn> they can only choose to invest in some of their children more than others, which isn't much of a choice 22:20 < muurkha> money flow in dowry is from bride's parents to the new nuclear family unit 22:21 < muurkha> wedding gifts today are maybe a ceremonial remnant of a custom that was important in thinner times 22:22 < fenn> would wedding gifts actually encourage people to get married that otherwise wouldn't waste time on dating? 22:23 < fenn> or whatever passed for courtship back then 22:23 < muurkha> yes 22:25 < muurkha> I mean if you move out of your parents' house it becomes difficult to use their knives, cutting boards, washing machine, refrigerator, plates, silverware 22:25 < muurkha> this makes marriage much less appealing, because it is a descent into material poverty 22:26 < fenn> woah woah woah, washing machine, refrigerator? are you saying wedding gifts were materially relevant in the 20th century? 22:26 < muurkha> yes 22:26 < muurkha> still are in places, I think 22:27 < fenn> i regularly see all of these things on the street (well, not knives) so it's hard to imagine people lacking them 22:27 < fenn> would a car be an example of a wedding gift? 22:27 < fenn> i also see those on the street heh 22:28 < muurkha> i don't think i've heard of that tradition so we're probably looking at things that date from before 01950 22:29 < muurkha> also probably if your aunt can afford to give you a car you don't need help buying a kitchen knife 22:29 < muurkha> or a dinette set 22:29 < fenn> i'm pretty sure kids cost orders of magnitude more than anything discussed here 22:29 < muurkha> not in 01948 22:30 < muurkha> i received materially relevant wedding gifts in march of this year 22:30 < fenn> just the hospital bills for maternity stuff 22:30 < muurkha> i was born at home, no hospital bill 22:30 < fenn> pff 22:30 < fenn> lucky you 22:30 < muurkha> more things in heaven and earth --- Log closed Fri May 26 00:00:12 2023