--- Day changed Fri Feb 07 2020 01:42 -!- jonatack [~jon@2a01:e0a:53c:a200:bb54:3be5:c3d0:9ce5] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 02:07 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 02:08 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has joined ##miniscript 02:50 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 02:50 -!- ghost43_ [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has joined ##miniscript 05:16 -!- jonatack [~jon@213.152.161.244] has joined ##miniscript 05:19 -!- jonatack [~jon@213.152.161.244] has quit [Client Quit] 05:19 -!- jonatack [~jon@213.152.161.244] has joined ##miniscript 07:18 -!- ghost43_ is now known as ghost43 07:30 -!- jonatack [~jon@213.152.161.244] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 07:56 < andytoshi> sipa: achow101 tells me that wsh(pk(key)) is a legal descriptor right now 07:56 < andytoshi> which corresponds to a wsh-wrapped miniscript of the form c:pk 07:57 < andytoshi> why does wsh(pk()) exist as a descriptor? can we change it to be consistent with miniscript? 07:59 < sipa> well it exists because it predates miniscript :) 08:00 < sipa> it's probably fine to change it, but we could also keep it 08:00 < sipa> and allow both 08:01 < sipa> i suspect nobody would be adversely affected by just changing it 08:12 < sipa> perhaps the name collision between pk() in descriptors now and pk() in miniscript is still unfortunate? 08:16 -!- jonatack [~jon@2a01:e0a:53c:a200:bb54:3be5:c3d0:9ce5] has joined ##miniscript 10:39 -!- sanket1729 [~sanket172@72.36.89.11] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 11:11 < achow101> andytoshi: sipa: some thoughts on that https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16800#issuecomment-583559190 15:06 -!- jb55 [~jb55@gateway/tor-sasl/jb55] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 15:09 -!- jb55 [~jb55@gateway/tor-sasl/jb55] has joined ##miniscript