--- Day changed Tue Nov 28 2017
00:39 -!- SopaXorzTaker [~SopaXorzT@unaffiliated/sopaxorztaker] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
00:40 -!- SopaXorzTaker [~SopaXorzT@unaffiliated/sopaxorztaker] has joined #secp256k1     
03:46 -!- jtimon [~quassel@164.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #secp256k1     
09:46 -!- jtimon [~quassel@164.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
11:09 -!- hdevalence [~hdevalenc@199-188-193-243.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has joined #secp256k1     
11:59 -!- jtimon [~quassel@164.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #secp256k1     
15:42 < andytoshi> so, there is a very awkward interaction between bulletproof aggregation and CA
15:42 < andytoshi> see line (61) of the paper. `g` there is the asset type, which in CA is different for every output
15:43 < andytoshi> so `g^t` needs to be a multiexp of `A_i ^ t_i` for many A_i's and t_i's
15:44 < andytoshi> so at the very least that introduces a linear scaling
17:13 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
17:26 -!- hdevalence [~hdevalenc@199-188-193-243.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
18:21 < maaku> andytoshi: linear in cost and space?
22:40 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #secp256k1