--- Log opened Sun Jul 14 00:00:11 2019
01:34 < fanquake> dongcarl: back working on the macOS toolchain upgrade. Clang 6, new cctools (with tapi library), 10.14 SDK "seems" to be working so far 🎉
01:35 < fanquake> bitcoind built on debian targeting darwin works on my macOS machine. Just need to figure out an issue with Qt.
01:36 < fanquake> I'm going to propose macOS 10.12 be the minimum required for 0.19.0, as that is the oldest supported by Qt 5.12LTS (+ other reasons), if we update to that in depends.
01:38 < fanquake> Would be a nice to have for macOS, at least dark mode would be properly supported.
01:46 < hebasto> fanquake: nice! #14797
01:47 < fanquake> hebasto yes that issue and it'll fix #16052
02:43 < fanquake> Turns out there isn't a Qt issue. It's now being picked up, and the cross compiled bitcoin-qt runs on my machine.
03:14 -!- jonatack [d598a114@213.152.161.20] has joined #bitcoin-builds
04:10 -!- jonatack [d598a114@213.152.161.20] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
04:28 -!- jonatack [56dedeb5@abayonne-654-1-79-181.w86-222.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #bitcoin-builds
05:00 -!- jonatack [56dedeb5@abayonne-654-1-79-181.w86-222.abo.wanadoo.fr] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
05:34  * dongcarl reading
05:36 < dongcarl> fanquake: I guess I'd be okay with that... I think OSX is less fragmented, but I don't really know the history of the policy surrounding upgrading like that
05:36 < dongcarl> Is it possible to maintain support for older than 10.12 with the new SDK?
05:37 < fanquake> dongcarl: I discussed it bit with Cory in AMS.
05:37 < fanquake> Potentially, but Qt 5.12+ drops support for <10.12, which means we can't upgrade to the next LTS.
05:38 < dongcarl> fanquake: When does 5.9 LTS end?
05:38 < fanquake> Generally macOS users seem to be pretty good at upgrading, and by the time 0.19.0 is released, 10.12 will have been unsupported for years.
05:38 < fanquake> Will check.
05:39 < dongcarl> May 2020 it seems
05:39 < fanquake> *10.11 unsupported
05:41 < fanquake> I can PR the changes as is, and if it's deemed too aggressive we can always crank back the versions.
05:41 < dongcarl> Yeah that sounds good, thanks for doing the work :-)
05:41 < dongcarl> It'd be nice if we could also get this patch in: https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=1ffcca4cc208c48ddb06b6a23abf1756f9724351
05:42 < dongcarl> I believe it's not in 5.12 LTS, but it'll make determinism simpler
05:42 < fanquake> Are we not already applying that?
05:42 < fanquake> fix_rcc_determinism.patch is in depends
05:43 < dongcarl> Ah, but we should conform to the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH standard tho
05:43 < fanquake> ah yea right, instead of QT_RCC_SOURCE_DATE_OVERRIDE
05:43 < fanquake> I'll look at that as well
05:43 < dongcarl> Okay next bit is just me rambling so it's on the record, no need to fix right now...
05:44 < dongcarl> The bug with QT not picking up Xlib...
05:44 < fanquake> 🐏
05:44 < dongcarl> The weird thing is that even when it doesn't, QT builds successfully and runs
05:44 < dongcarl> BUT... before one of my cleanup commits... it used to pick up XLib
05:44 < dongcarl> This was identified by looking at the logs
05:44 < dongcarl> So it's very curious why it doesn't anymore...
05:45  * dongcarl needs to re-read channel logs to figure things out
05:45 < fanquake> hmm ok
05:45 < dongcarl> even more curious is why it works even when it doesn't pick up xlib
05:46 < fanquake> Is the naive assumption that the Qt we're building doesn't actually rely on any of it..?
05:46 < dongcarl> Also... DARK MODE BITCOIN-QT LEGGGOOOOO
05:46 < fanquake> Yea I'm looking forward to having that work properly, so i don't have to make deploy before testing anything Qt related..
05:47 < fanquake> Still looks like this expect sort of worse: #14593
05:48 < dongcarl> expect sort of worse?
05:48 < dongcarl> except sort of worse?
05:50 < fanquake> I'll get a screenshot in a sec
05:52 < fanquake> dongcarl: what's your go-to image sharing platform?
05:52 < dongcarl> fanquake: imgur? (i know i'm basic)
05:52 < fanquake> that was my thought as well hah, but wanted to check there wasn't something much cooler to use
05:53 < fanquake> Also. Currently have 4.59GB left on my 1TB drive :O
05:57 < fanquake> I might have been telling lies. Building with Qt 5.13 actually looks ok: https://imgur.com/a/6gjzrzY
05:57 < fanquake> Going to rebuild with 5.9.x
06:01 < fanquake> depends 5.9: https://imgur.com/a/Js9zZpb
06:02 < dongcarl> fanquake: Oh that's pretty good
06:02 < dongcarl> we just need the svgs to be nice
06:02 < dongcarl> or whatever we use for icons
06:02 < fanquake> just clarifying you mean 5.13 is good ?
06:02 < fanquake> I have trouble looking at 5.9 like that.
06:17 < dongcarl> yeah 5.13 looks nice
06:19 < fanquake> 🍻
08:36 -!- jonatack [58aba822@jau64-1-88-171-168-34.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #bitcoin-builds
08:59 -!- jonatack [58aba822@jau64-1-88-171-168-34.fbx.proxad.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
17:45 -!- hebasto [~hebasto@95.164.65.194] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
20:18 -!- hebasto [~hebasto@95.164.65.194] has joined #bitcoin-builds
20:50 -!- hebasto [~hebasto@95.164.65.194] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
23:50 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: wumpus
23:53 -!- fanquake [sid369002@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-emiteaxrcumvxgox] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
23:53 -!- fanquake [sid369002@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-anqtzbzrpjwzkacr] has joined #bitcoin-builds
--- Log closed Mon Jul 15 00:00:11 2019