--- Day changed Wed Oct 07 2015
00:22 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
00:40 -!- ParadoxSpiral [~ParadoxSp@p508B86CA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
00:54 -!- randy-waterhouse [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/randy-waterhouse] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:00 -!- kyuupichan [~Neil@ae053102.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:00 -!- kyuupichan [~Neil@ae053102.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp] has left #bitcoin-core-dev ["Leaving"]
01:02 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:07 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Client Quit]
01:07 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:07 -!- n0n0__ [~n0n0@x4d067290.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:21 -!- Guest41021 is now known as maaku
01:25 -!- maaku [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
01:29 -!- maaku [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:30 -!- maaku is now known as Guest45905
01:36 -!- Guest45905 is now known as maaku
01:59 < GitHub94> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/4fac576c619f...49dd5c629df0
01:59 < GitHub94> bitcoin/master b196b68 Gregory Maxwell: Test LowS in standardness, removes nuisance malleability vector....
01:59 < GitHub94> bitcoin/master 49dd5c6 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6769...
01:59 < GitHub89> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6769: Test LowS in standardness, removes nuisance malleability vector. (master...no_nuisance_malleability) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6769
02:13 < GitHub107> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.10: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b1d76af0ea35dc349f96251496fdfafe3ffab759
02:13 < GitHub107> bitcoin/0.10 b1d76af Gregory Maxwell: Test LowS in standardness, removes nuisance malleability vector....
02:19 < GitHub13> [bitcoin] laanwj force-pushed 0.10 from b1d76af to 1cea6b0: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commits/0.10
02:19 < GitHub13> bitcoin/0.10 1cea6b0 Gregory Maxwell: Test LowS in standardness, removes nuisance malleability vector....
02:23 < wumpus> needed force-push: forgot the sign the commit
02:25 < CodeShark> no harm :)
02:32 < GitHub136> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.11: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/71cc9d9fe829efd9c9b012c4cd1ece1d988b4869
02:32 < GitHub136> bitcoin/0.11 71cc9d9 Gregory Maxwell: Test LowS in standardness, removes nuisance malleability vector....
02:50 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:51 < dcousens> gmaxwell: another day, another fund-losing bug in JS land
02:52 < dcousens> This one affects all devices on Android 4.3 or below
02:52 < dcousens> Not even sure how many wallets are affected
02:52 < dcousens> But, I know at least 3
02:53 < CodeShark> oh?
02:54 < dcousens> CodeShark: 4.3 web views overflow when assigning 32 bit integers to UInt8 byte arrays
02:54 < dcousens> Not consistently either
02:54 < dcousens> But,  we have solid repro
02:55 < dcousens> CodeShark: https://github.com/feross/buffer/pull/81
02:56 < CodeShark> this sounds more serious than just potentially fund-losing
02:56 < dcousens> CodeShark: question is,  where do you even post it?
02:57 < dcousens> I'm thinking about writing it up for bitcoinjs-lib,  bitcore etc
02:57 < CodeShark> contact the wallet authors?
02:58 < dcousens> CodeShark: hard to tell who uses JS under the hood
02:58 < dcousens> I know CoPay does, and it doesn't use XWalk
02:58 < dcousens> I know BlockTrail does (already contacted, their doing a migration now, Ruben helped discover this when users reported mismatched key derivations)
02:59 < dcousens> Basically every webwallet [when run on android 4.3 w/o a new version of Chrome]
02:59 < dcousens> (Assuming* they use typed arrays)
03:00 < CodeShark> all browser controls in android in all apps use this same web view control?
03:02 < dcousens> CodeShark: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/webkit/WebView.html
03:02 < dcousens> Typically the SDK has 1 WebView implementation, and depending on certain factors, it may or may not be the same one as the phones default browser
03:04 < CodeShark> and the correct behavior should be? crashing? truncation?
03:04 < dcousens> CodeShark: %256
03:04 < dcousens> mod 256
03:04 < CodeShark> so the least significant byte
03:04 < dcousens> aye
03:05 < dcousens> that is the *defined* behaviour
03:05 < CodeShark> doesn't sound good - are the android folks working on a patch?
03:06 < dcousens> CodeShark: haven't been in contact with them yet,  but I'm not sure what the dynamics/communication pathways are there yet.
03:21 < dcousens> CodeShark: any ideas on who you would contact for that?
03:22 < CodeShark> I wish I had some suggestions - unfortunately I don't know how to help
03:22 < dcousens> like,  if they could update those web views
03:22 < dcousens> Wouldn't they juts update the entire android anyway?
03:23 -!- Squidicc [~squid@pool-72-74-133-29.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
03:23 < dcousens> I get the feeling the best bet is to just put out the notices to the major JS libs and maybe ping in a few more wallet devs
03:23 < CodeShark> that's what one would think...but I'm guessing there could be compatibility issues or lack of device support that might prevent people from updating the entire android. admittedly, I'm no android expert
03:24 < CodeShark> my android development experience consists of a handful of toy apps :p
03:24 < wumpus> yes, lack of device support for updates is very common, unfortunately
03:26 < dcousens> I'm just glad I deployed the bitcoin apps I work on with XWalk (compatibility, 20mb+ to your app size, but guarantees a consistent (and new) web view across all versions)
03:29 < wumpus> so that's why all those apps are so large nowadays :-) I have a very old, severly resource-challenged smartphone and every time there's application updates available, I need to remove at least one application to make room.
03:29 < wumpus> at some point it's going to be unusable and I'm not actually sure I'm going to get a smartphone again
03:31 < CodeShark> is there still another option? pay phones? :)
03:31 < CodeShark> remember those things?
03:31 < dcousens> CodeShark: rpi with a GSM module? haha
03:32 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
03:32 < wumpus> well there's still cheap 'dumbphones' available that can only call and text. At least when I checked a year ago or so. For old people, like me :-)
03:34 < dcousens> wumpus: but are they actually 'dumb'? :P
03:36 < wumpus> good point. So that leaves... someone have an old Nokia 3310 laying around... ? :P
03:37 < CodeShark> I think I still have a Motorola StarTak somewhere
03:37 < CodeShark> lol
03:37 < CodeShark> s/StarTak/StarTAC
03:37 < CodeShark> from like the mid 1990's
03:37 < wumpus> heh
03:39 < CodeShark> I remember when I got my first cell phone - a car phone - the transciever took up like half the trunk :p
03:39 < dcousens> wumpus: whats the concern anyway, NSA paranoia? :P
03:39 < wumpus> I had a similar one, maybe even the same
03:39 < wumpus> CodeShark: awesome
03:41 < wumpus> dcousens: not so much the NSA, but exploiting vulnerabilities isn't exactly only NSA territory, especially in old software given the lack of vendor support for keeping software up to date and secure
03:44 < wumpus> the ecosystem is a mess. Would be great to have a phone that's more like a normal PC. I think that's what Nokia tried with N900, shame it didn't go very far.
03:44 < CodeShark> built-in obsolescence is a feature of all modern appliances :)
03:45 < wumpus> but not that fast
03:45 < wumpus> anyhow, this has veered very far off topic, sorry for that
03:46 < CodeShark> now to tie it back to some PR...
04:27 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
04:27 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has quit [Changing host]
04:27 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
04:42 -!- fkhan [weechat@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-ndcobfptkpdhblbm] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
05:08 -!- Squidicuz [~squid@pool-72-74-133-29.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
05:10 -!- fkhan [weechat@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-joobpgnlmpudepcs] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
05:38 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:00 < GitHub95> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/49dd5c629df0...d479311dba25
06:00 < GitHub95> bitcoin/master 1534d9a EthanHeilman: Creates unittests for addrman, makes addrman testable....
06:00 < GitHub95> bitcoin/master d479311 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6720...
06:00 < GitHub68> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6720: Creates unittests for addrman, makes addrman more testable. (master...unittest) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6720
06:08 -!- pigeons [~pigeons@94.242.209.214] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
06:08 -!- pigeons [~pigeons@94.242.209.214] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:09 -!- pigeons is now known as Guest74766
06:14 -!- adam3us1 [~Adium@c3-219.i07-1.onvol.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
06:23 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.33] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:31 -!- Justitia [527b7c22@gateway/web/freenode/ip.82.123.124.34] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
07:06 -!- d_t [~textual@c-50-136-139-144.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:22 < GitHub192> [bitcoin] CodeShark opened pull request #6774: ISM to softforks unit (master...ISM_to_softforks_unit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6774
07:28 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:49 -!- jl2012_ [~jl2012@119246245241.ctinets.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
07:50 -!- maaku [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
07:50 -!- jl2012 [~jl2012@unaffiliated/jl2012] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:50 -!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
07:51 -!- maaku__ [~quassel@173-228-107-141.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
07:51 -!- maaku [~quassel@173-228-107-141.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:51 -!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:51 -!- maaku is now known as Guest4879
07:52 -!- maaku__ [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:57 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:00 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
08:22 -!- CodeShark [CodeShark@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
08:30 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
08:36 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:00 -!- treehug88 [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:08 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.33] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
09:22 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.50] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:24 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.50] has quit [Client Quit]
09:36 -!- maaku__ is now known as maaku
10:15 < stonecoldpat> hi, is there any reason payment protocol files (i.e. paymentserver.cpp) is inside the /qt folder? 
10:15 < morcos> BlueMatt: you around?
10:15 < morcos> there is definitely some mempool stressing going on now
10:16 < stonecoldpat> (apart from the fact it is used by qt, the logic doesnt need to be there from what i can tell) 
10:16 < morcos> i started a new node running 6722 (with 50MB mempool) and within a few mins it was rejecting txs
10:16 < morcos> I think it would be great to add some more debugging output to 6722
10:17 <@sipa> stonecoldpat: it relies on qt's ssl inplementatiin, unfortunately
10:17 <@sipa> s/inplementatiin/interface/
10:18 < paveljanik> morcos, yup, https://bitcoinfees.github.io/#30m
10:19 < morcos> interestingly this "attack" does not depend only on chains of transactions.  i've had a node up running my new low limits since yesterday and its up to 178M of mempool usage itself
10:25 -!- d_t [~textual@c-50-136-139-144.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]
10:25 < stonecoldpat> sipa: ah i see, thats quite annoying! thanks though :) 
10:33 < paveljanik> example tx: 895e6500146b67dc668eb73ce490cdf6c49ad2a5682a599b8f12fa97952f2400
10:39 < Luke-Jr> hmm
10:39 < Luke-Jr> so to bring BIP70 to bitcoind probably means replacing that with libcurl or smth
10:40 < Luke-Jr> or maybe it could just use QtNetwork as an optional dep
10:42 < paveljanik> 100inputs, 1 output, fee 15000
10:43 < wumpus> Luke-Jr: evhttp would work just as well - but I don't think moving it to bitcoind would make a lot of sense, at least the fetching part. Parsing/processing of payment messages might.
10:43 < stonecoldpat> Luke-Jr: I dont know if it has QtNetwork (if its related to the Q classes), for example QByteArray is used for the payment data structure, but that isn't accessible without core
10:43 < stonecoldpat> s/core/qt
10:44 < stonecoldpat> wumpus: thats what i was hoping to do, verify payment messages using bitcoind 
10:44 < wumpus> then again, I think it'd be better to make a BIP70 handling library that is completely independent of bitcoind
10:45 < Luke-Jr> wumpus: probably
10:45 < Luke-Jr> BIP70 adoption is not going fast enough IMO
10:45 < wumpus> that would have been better, it could be done pretty much independent of any specific wallet / frontend implementation
10:45 < wumpus> and also include functionality to make payment protocol messages
10:48 < wumpus> an example could interface to bitcoind and handle BIP70 either as client as server - as long as it is clear that it is a layer on top
10:49 < kanzure> what is the measure of bip70 adoption?
10:49 < stonecoldpat> wumpus: ah you mean like another module, but it interacts with bitcoind to do the signing? (so builds payment message, and then calls rpc of bicoind to create and sign transaction?) 
10:49 < stonecoldpat> at the moment, its supported by bitpay and coinbase, so 100k+ merchants should be using it 
10:50 < wumpus> stonecoldpat: yes 
10:50 < randy-waterhouse> "should be"
10:51 < Luke-Jr> it's very hard for non-merchants to use, though
10:51 < kanzure> sounds like coinbase/bitpay might have internal metrics around adoption, but other than that we don't know? just curious what Luke-Jr is estimating from because would be useful.
10:52 < Luke-Jr> kanzure: also, most wallets besides Core don't support sending to it
10:53 <@sipa> afaik, nearly no wallets support creating payment requesrts...
10:53 -!- mode/#bitcoin-core-dev [-o sipa] by sipa
10:54 < stonecoldpat> Luke-Jr: I wouldn't say thats entirely true, core, bitcoinj, breadwallet, hive, electrum support sending payments to a payment request, but as sipa said there is no wallet that supports creating a request 
10:54 < kanzure> wallet/implementation adoption is much easier to measure than user usage. so i'll give you that.
10:54 < Luke-Jr> stonecoldpat: oh? didn't know Electrum did for example
10:55 < stonecoldpat> Luke-Jr: they seem to have code in their github for it (ive never used electrum) 
10:56 < stonecoldpat> Luke-Jr: actually, for electrum it may only be for creating a payment request, sorry for that. 
10:58 < stonecoldpat> wumpus: if it would help, I can look into making a module for bip70 that interfaces with bitcoind
10:59 < Luke-Jr> stonecoldpat: as wumpus said, an external library would probably be best ;)
10:59 < wumpus> stonecoldpat: well I would write it generally, as a library; then one of the examples could be interfacing with bitcoind
11:02 < wumpus> stonecoldpat: I think binding it to bitcoind specifically reduces the usefulness, people may want to use other wallets, or even without a wallet (just a database of addresses, of which one is dealt out for every now payment)
11:07 < stonecoldpat> wumpus: ah okay, yes that makes sense. i'll have a look into getting a library made then. This is actually better than what I planned to do, now i don't have to worry about messing with core code which should be easier. :) 
11:09 < wumpus> stonecoldpat: :)
11:27 -!- bitdevsnyc [bitdevsnyc@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-sjoljjxsgnbkytbf] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:32 -!- ParadoxSpiral_ [~ParadoxSp@p508B99E1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:35 -!- ParadoxSpiral [~ParadoxSp@p508B86CA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
11:42 -!- alpalp [6836eb1c@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.104.54.235.28] has quit [K-Lined]
11:48 -!- Guest74766 is now known as pigeons
11:52 -!- BlueMatt [~BlueMatt@unaffiliated/bluematt] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:25 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:27 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
12:46 -!- harding_ [~harding@mail.dtrt.org] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:47 -!- harding [~harding@mail.dtrt.org] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
12:49 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:49 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12:52 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
14:22 -!- treehug88 [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]
14:41 < GitHub83> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #6776: Support -checkmempool=N, which runs checks once every N transactions (master...fraccheck) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6776
14:46 -!- ParadoxSpiral_ [~ParadoxSp@p508B99E1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
15:00 -!- randy-waterhouse [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/randy-waterhouse] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
15:11 -!- bitdevsn_ [~bitdevsny@cpe-74-68-119-97.nyc.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15:15 -!- bitdevsnyc [bitdevsnyc@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-sjoljjxsgnbkytbf] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
15:24 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
15:26 -!- bitdevsnyc [bitdevsnyc@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-ntfvqspyunzfiowk] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15:28 -!- bitdevsn_ [~bitdevsny@cpe-74-68-119-97.nyc.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
15:32 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15:34 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.63] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16:24 < dcousens> wumpus: short of something more formal, https://github.com/feross/buffer/pull/81#issuecomment-146362284 should be OK for now
16:24 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
16:24 < dcousens> If you know any JS wallet devs that aren't in that post,  feel free to PM me and I'll tag (or tag them yourself)
16:43 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16:46 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
16:57 -!- goregrin1 [~goregrind@unaffiliated/goregrind] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:00 -!- goregrind [~goregrind@unaffiliated/goregrind] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
17:01 -!- n0n0__ [~n0n0@x4d067290.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
17:11 < phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, connection limiting patch successfully prevented some broken client claiming to be bitcoinj from using all my connection slots
17:14 -!- alpalp [6836eb1c@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.104.54.235.28] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:16 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:16 < GitHub33> [bitcoin] jamesob opened pull request #6777: Unobfuscate chainstate data in CCoinsViewDB::GetStats (master...obfuscate_fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6777
17:19 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
17:22 -!- adam3us1 [~Adium@195.138.228.7] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:22 -!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.63] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
17:31 < midnightmagic> adam3us1: Reconsider using Adium on your Mac. Development appears to have stalled and as far as I know they haven't verified any of the recent issues with e.g. TLS, their development branches haven't been committed-to in at least six months (https://hg.adium.im/adium/branches), the last major release was in 2014, building it on a modern OS/X is not easy with a modern OS/X, they aren't using
17:31 < midnightmagic>  a recent libpurple, etc etc ad
17:31 < midnightmagic> nauseum.
17:34 < dgenr8> la -l
17:34 < phantomcircuit> dgenr8, ooooh
17:35  * dgenr8 decides to let people wonder what "la" is ... so they only notice one screwup
17:36 < phantomcircuit> dgenr8, haha
17:41 < sipa> la is obviously a UNIX command to produce a 440 Hz sound, and the -l makes it long?
17:42 < dcousens> sipa: ha
17:48 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:51 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
17:54 -!- CodeShark_ [~CodeShark@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
18:22 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
18:31 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
18:33 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
19:23 -!- go1111111 [~go1111111@162.244.138.37] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
19:27 < cfields> gmaxwell / sipa: what do you mean by "searchable" in the context of sendheaders?
19:35 -!- go1111111 [~go1111111@104.200.154.49] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:54 < morcos> BlueMatt: ping?
20:00 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:03 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
20:04 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:06 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
20:06 < morcos> BlueMatt: I have to get to bed, I left a comment on the pull, but I don't understand what you did with removing the addition of the minrelayfee
20:06 < morcos> thats the only thing that prevents free relay
20:07 < morcos> otherwise what stops someone from constantly broadcasting at the rollingFee + epislon
20:07 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:07 < morcos> the whole point is you have to pay for the fee of what you evicted PLUS your own fee
20:10 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
20:11 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:13 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
20:14 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:16 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
20:26 -!- d_t [~textual@c-50-136-139-144.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:29 -!- PRab [~chatzilla@2601:40a:8000:8f9b:ecff:c568:dd9:bcb8] has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.92 [Firefox 41.0.1/20150929144111]]
20:47 < dcousens> morcos: that description would be great to summarise that entire PR
20:47 < dcousens> "the whole point is you have to pay for the fee of what you evicted PLUS your own fee"
20:48 < dcousens> Must admit, "cheapest transaction" doesn't convey that message to me
20:48 < dcousens> And confused me for a little bit until I read it in depth
20:49 < dcousens> I guess, 'least profitable' might be better, or 'lowest fee-paying' 
20:49 < dcousens> anyway.
20:58 -!- baldur_ [~baldur@pool-173-52-43-219.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
20:59 -!- baldur [~baldur@pool-173-52-43-219.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:09 < GitHub57> [bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #6779: build: Make use of ZMQ_CFLAGS (master...fix-zmq-cflags) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6779
21:12 -!- adam3us [~Adium@c3-219.i07-1.onvol.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:14 < jcorgan> cfields: that's a bit embarassing
21:15 -!- adam3us1 [~Adium@195.138.228.7] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
21:16 < cfields> jcorgan: should've been caught in review :\
21:16 < cfields> sorry about that
21:18 < jcorgan> my autotools fu has sharply declined since my usual code base switched to cmake a few years ago
21:19 < cfields> no worries. every projects tends to adopt its own autotools incantations anyway
21:19 < cfields> -s
21:52 -!- bitdevsnyc [bitdevsnyc@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-ntfvqspyunzfiowk] has quit []
23:18 < BlueMatt> morcos: pong
23:19 < BlueMatt> morcos: oh, I suppose I responded via email on the pr, then
23:19 -!- randy-waterhouse [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/randy-waterhouse] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:31 -!- CodeShark_ [~CodeShark@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has quit []
23:31 -!- CodeShark [~CodeShark@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:42 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:45 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
23:58 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]