--- Day changed Thu Dec 03 2015 00:06 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:09 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 00:25 -!- guest234234 [~guest2342@223.207.200.223] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:45 -!- randy-waterhouse [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/randy-waterhouse] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 00:46 -!- btcdrak [uid115429@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-imneqdqceqwudrgv] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 00:48 -!- [1]evoskuil [~evoskuil@c-73-225-134-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:49 -!- evoskuil [~evoskuil@c-73-225-134-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- IRC with a difference] 00:49 -!- [1]evoskuil is now known as evoskuil 01:02 -!- btcdrak [uid115429@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-imkciojtlmbbmjjp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:03 -!- bsm1175322 [~mcelrath@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 01:12 -!- bsm117532 [~mcelrath@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:20 -!- bsm117532 [~mcelrath@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 01:22 -!- bsm117532 [~mcelrath@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:35 -!- bsm117532 [~mcelrath@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 01:39 -!- evoskuil [~evoskuil@c-73-225-134-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 01:39 -!- bsm117532 [~mcelrath@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:44 -!- evoskuil [~evoskuil@c-73-225-134-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:47 < GitHub48> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #7159: [RPC] Add RBF opt-in possibilities to rawtx functions (master...2015/12/rpc_rbf) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7159 01:53 < GitHub138> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/aeedd8a53b2d...3cd836c1d855 01:53 < GitHub138> bitcoin/master fab8347 MarcoFalke: [qt] Use tr() instead of _()... 01:53 < GitHub138> bitcoin/master 3cd836c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7158... 01:53 < GitHub45> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7158: [qt] Use tr() instead of _() (master...MarcoFalke-2015-translations) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7158 02:17 < wumpus> dcousens: because "As defined in W. Richard Stevens' 1990 book, Unix Network Programming (Addison-Wesley, 1990), a daemon is 'a process that executes 'in the background' (i.e., without an associated terminal or login shell)" 02:17 < wumpus> at best, stderr is connected to nowhere, at worst, it causes some other trouble... 02:30 -!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:32 < dcousens> wumpus: assuming you run bitcoind in `-daemon` mode :P 02:32 < wumpus> obviously 02:33 < dcousens> perhaps `-printtoconsole` should override that behaviour, allowing stderr to be meaningful 02:33 < wumpus> (just want to put it in context besides bitcoin) 02:34 -!- MarcoFalke [c3523fc6@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.195.82.63.198] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:44 < dcousens> haha, yeah, thanks for the ref :) 02:52 < wumpus> and sure - something could be said for an 'error log' in addition to the 'debug log' for serious issues, which in case of printtoconsole could go to stderr 02:54 < wumpus> * [new branch] 0.12 -> 0.12 02:55 < MarcoFalke> :3 02:57 < sipa> wheeeeeee 03:02 < BlueMatt> ! 03:03 -!- zxzzt [~prod@static-100-38-11-146.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 03:11 -!- evoskuil [~evoskuil@c-73-225-134-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 03:14 < GitHub145> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/c12ff995f7d70aafb12f34887fb64aa7482bbc85 03:14 < GitHub145> bitcoin/master c12ff99 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Now that 0.12 has been branched, master is 0.12.99... 03:17 -!- zxzzt [~prod@static-100-38-11-146.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:20 -!- guest234234 [~guest2342@223.207.200.223] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 03:24 < GitHub32> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.12: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/29850008085811fc93b71b345fb2da4146d695e4 03:24 < GitHub32> bitcoin/0.12 2985000 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Bump version to 0.12.0... 03:24 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:25 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 03:26 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:27 < gmaxwell> weee 03:34 < wumpus> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7062 is still open for 0.12 milestone, but we'll just backport that when merged 03:35 < MarcoFalke> What is https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/milestones/0.11.0 03:36 < sipa> MarcoFalke: things that ought to be backported to 0.11 if we do a new release in that branch 03:37 < wumpus> MarcoFalke: I was somewhat surprised too :) 03:37 < wumpus> but yes what sipa says makes sense 03:37 < sipa> hah, greg tagged it as 0.12 AND 0.11 03:37 < sipa> but it seems github only remembers one 03:38 < MarcoFalke> It was never done this way, but yeah. 03:38 < wumpus> right, as only one milestone is remembered, it's not terribly convenient for selection 03:38 < sipa> maybe we just need tags for milestones 03:39 < wumpus> not for milestones, but a tag 'needs backport' may be useful, dunno 03:39 < MarcoFalke> milestones are for future releases? 03:39 < MarcoFalke> yes, per wumpus 03:39 < MarcoFalke> "backport .11" tag 03:40 < wumpus> I'm not even sure it needs an explicit version in it, a general tag may be enough, then the issue itself could mention to what versions 03:40 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 03:41 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:42 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 03:43 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:49 < gmaxwell> Damn, github seemed to show "added 12 and 11" in the log, so I assumed it actually did add it to both. 03:49 < GitHub142> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6745: Net: Remove "Address refresh broadcast" logic. (master...addr_known_reset) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6745 03:52 < gmaxwell> What height are people at right now? 03:52 < sipa> 386520 03:52 < sipa> ;;height 03:52 < gribble> Error: "height" is not a valid command. 03:52 < sipa> ;;blocks 03:52 < gmaxwell> darn it, why is my laptop saying "0 blocks received in the last 4 hours" ? It's at 386520. 03:52 < gribble> 386520 03:52 < midnightmagic> 38652 03:53 < midnightmagic> er +0 03:53 < midnightmagic> ;;tblb 03:53 < gribble> (tblb ) -- Calculate the expected time between blocks which take at least seconds to create. To provide the argument, a nested 'seconds' command may be helpful. 03:53 < midnightmagic> ;;tslb 03:53 < gribble> Time since last block: 13 minutes and 38 seconds 03:53 < gmaxwell> sipa: that gribble command just queries bc.i ... perhaps we should cluestick nanotube about the rest interface in bitcond. :) 03:53 < sipa> gmaxwell: i know, but more information is useful 03:54 < gmaxwell> I think what might happen is that while the laptop is in my bag and offline the warning triggers and it doesn't go away when back online. 03:55 < btcdrak> oh look, we branched :) 04:16 -!- MazrimTaim [~mazrimtai@ool-18ba8bdf.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:17 < GitHub182> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 7 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c12ff995f7d7...884367662155 04:17 < GitHub182> bitcoin/master ec73ef3 Gregory Maxwell: Replace setInventoryKnown with a rolling bloom filter.... 04:17 < GitHub182> bitcoin/master e206724 Gregory Maxwell: Remove mruset as it is no longer used. 04:17 < GitHub182> bitcoin/master 6b84935 Patick Strateman: Rename setInventoryKnown filterInventoryKnown 04:17 < GitHub120> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7133: Replace setInventoryKnown with a rolling bloom filter (rebase of #7100) (master...known_bloom) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7133 04:18 -!- fanquake [~Adium@unaffiliated/fanquake] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:33 -!- fanquake [~Adium@unaffiliated/fanquake] has left #bitcoin-core-dev [] 04:37 < GitHub84> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/884367662155...54a550bef8a8 04:37 < GitHub84> bitcoin/master 086ee67 Pieter Wuille: Switch to a more efficient rolling Bloom filter... 04:37 < GitHub84> bitcoin/master 54a550b Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7113... 04:37 < GitHub22> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7113: Switch to a more efficient rolling Bloom filter (master...betterrolling) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7113 04:37 < GitHub154> [bitcoin] laanwj reopened pull request #6745: Net: Remove "Address refresh broadcast" logic. (master...addr_known_reset) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6745 04:53 < sipa> wumpus: i'll review more PRs (merged and unmerged ones) for 0.12, but first HK 04:54 < GitHub52> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/54a550bef8a8...5548d9cb11c8 04:54 < GitHub52> bitcoin/master b440409 Matt Bogosian: Add missing automake package to deb-based UNIX install instructions. 04:54 < GitHub52> bitcoin/master 5548d9c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7152... 04:54 < GitHub183> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7152: Add missing automake package to deb-based UNIX install instructions. (master...posita/fix-doc-build-unix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7152 04:55 < wumpus> sipa: sure! 04:58 < GitHub168> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.12: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/cfb44ce97a939cb9b6db96f4b273c2a618e11d88 04:58 < GitHub168> bitcoin/0.12 cfb44ce Matt Bogosian: Add missing automake package to deb-based UNIX install instructions.... 05:13 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [] 05:34 < jtimon> so when is 0.12 going to branch? 05:35 < jtimon> wasn't it supposed to be dec 1st? 05:35 < MarcoFalke> It already did? 05:35 < jtimon> MarcoFalke: oh, I missed that, thanks 05:37 < MarcoFalke> jtimon maybe you can create a separate PR for the first 3 commits of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6625/commits 05:37 < MarcoFalke> So they don't go through the rebase every time. 05:38 < jtimon> now I can start working on top of 3cd836c1, great! 05:40 < jtimon> MarcoFalke: yeah I suggested it https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6625#issuecomment-157403741 but sipa said that wasn't necessary. As said here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6625#issuecomment-161610648 is what I'm going to do the next time that the last commit causes conflicts 05:41 < jtimon> btcdrak: said it was fine for 0.12 too, but that didn't ended up being the case 05:46 -!- MarcoFalke [c3523fc6@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.195.82.63.198] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client] 06:10 < GitHub156> [bitcoin] ptschip opened pull request #7164: Do not download transactions during initial blockchain sync (master...tx_getdata) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7164 06:17 < GitHub142> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #7165: WIP: build: Enable C++11 in build, require C++11 compiler (master...2015_12_c++11) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7165 06:21 < gmaxwell> \O/ 06:22 < sipa> and the crowd goes wild 06:22 < wumpus> hah! 06:23 < sipa> test/scheduler_tests.cpp:31:13: warning: ‘void scheduler_tests::MicroSleep(uint64_t)’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static void MicroSleep(uint64_t n) 06:24 < wumpus> sipa: yeah that function is not used pending fixing of the scheduler tests, harmles 06:24 < sipa> i'm aware, just wasn't sure whether we were aware of the warning :) 06:24 < wumpus> I was aware 06:24 < wumpus> scheduler stuff really needs to be fixed, I just have no time for that right now 06:25 < sipa> understood 06:25 < wumpus> (this is better than having travis hang 4% of the time) 06:31 < gmaxwell> :-/ 06:36 < wumpus> not sure even if it's a bug in the test or the implementation. Though I'm not aware of any issues with it that don't concern the test, although in practice we only use it single-threaded so whatever trips up the test is likely not an issue in practical use... 06:37 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 06:37 < wumpus> if the intent is to only ever use it single-threadedly, both the implementation and the test could be simplified a lot 06:38 < wumpus> (although it is always difficult to test something inherently time-based) 06:39 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:55 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:25 < jl2012> Why Antpool is not upgrading to BIP65? It is the last major pool to upgrade 07:25 < jl2012> sorry wrong group 07:27 < cfields> oh, i hadn't seen the 0.12 branch yet. woohoo :) 07:31 < cfields> sipa: i have a few questions about addrman when you have a min 07:33 < cfields> sipa: for one, i'm not understanding the timing used for Connected() 07:33 -!- ParadoxSpiral [~ParadoxSp@p508B8293.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:34 < jtimon> btcdrak: could you make me a branch with bip68 and bip112 on top of 3cd836c1 ? 07:35 < cfields> (specifically, why it's called when a node is deleted). Is that meant to mean "this is the last time i saw that i was connected to this node" ? 07:35 < jtimon> no hurry though, I can do it myself if you don't have time as well 07:36 < sipa> cfields: yup 07:36 < jtimon> would be nicer to wait for them to get merged before backporting the commits, but I'm not sure I can wait that long... 07:36 < sipa> that's why it's done then, to not leak information beforehand about being connected to that node 07:37 -!- treehug88 [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:37 < cfields> sipa: ok. So is it reasonable to call that any time is a node is disconnected, whether done via forced disconnect/ban, shutdown, timeout, etc? 07:38 < cfields> i assume yes? 07:41 < sipa> yes 07:41 < sipa> i guess it would be even better to pass along the timestamp, and send it the lastreceived timestamp of CNode 07:42 < cfields> yes, that's what i was planning to change it to 07:43 < cfields> well, i was intending to use the disconnect time itself. lastreceived makes more sense i guess 07:44 < sipa> don't think it matters much 07:44 < cfields> max(lastsent,lastreceived) maybe? 07:44 < cfields> ok 07:44 < cfields> lastly, mind commenting on https://github.com/theuni/bitcoin/commit/792b0f5da618ea51ecd7b21db633faa6743c1e68 ? 07:46 < sipa> lastsent doesn't mean much, we want to know when we last saw the node 07:47 < sipa> will look, but not now 07:47 < cfields> the range/mask is up for bikeshed, i'm just interested in your general opinion 07:47 < cfields> np, thanks 07:49 < cfields> gmaxwell: would be great to get your thoughts on that as well since it was your idea :) 07:50 < jtimon> cfields: any further thoughts on #7091 ? 07:51 < cfields> jtimon: i haven't been keeping up with those. looking now. 07:51 < jtimon> cfields: thanks! 07:54 < cfields> jtimon: i really don't care for the idea of building everything twice when a helper lib can be used to avoid that. Also, as-is, that seems like a slipperly slope as everything that's lib-friendly is likely to start ending up in that last. 07:54 < jtimon> no, only whatever is required to expose verifyblock in libconsensus should end up there 07:55 < jtimon> but things are being built twice for libconsensus already, that doesn't change 07:56 < jtimon> main, chain and coins should never end up there, even if they end up being lib-friendly 07:56 < cfields> jtimon: understood. but if you're creating a helper lib, may as well use it 07:57 < jtimon> I don't undesrtand the point about the helper lib 07:57 < jtimon> why is it a "helper" lib? 07:57 < jtimon> and how is the consensus package not being used? 07:58 < cfields> by "helper" i mean a private lib that's only used for linking into public binaries 07:58 < cfields> jtimon: i gave a patch a few days ago that shows how to link the helper directly into libconsensus.so rather than building twice 07:59 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:00 < jtimon> oh, yes, I focused on your nits (and finding out that for some reason the packages have to be build in backards order [linking order]), but I forgot about cherry picking from your branch 08:00 < jtimon> I'll look into that 08:01 < jtimon> btw, you never answer that question, why autotools wants the packages to be build in the same order that is needed for linking (the opposite of what I was trying to achieve) 08:01 < jtimon> ? 08:02 < cfields> jtimon: i responded on github 08:02 < jtimon> cfields: but to be clear, your improvement is kind of orthogonal to mine, isn't it? 08:03 < cfields> jtimon: no, the helper lib needs to be created one way or the other 08:03 < jtimon> I had further questions: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7091#issuecomment-160295304 08:04 < jtimon> cfields: but that can be done after 7091, no? 08:04 < cfields> jtimon: no, the lib syntax and usage is different 08:04 < jtimon> oh, I didn't knew that 08:05 < cfields> one is an automake lib, the other is a libtool lib 08:05 < jtimon> I guess I'll have to close #7091 and start over 08:05 < cfields> jtimon: you'll be in HK? 08:05 < jtimon> yes 08:06 < cfields> maybe we can hack on it a bit there? 08:06 < jtimon> yeah, it would be nice to do this in front of you (or you do it in front of me) 08:07 < cfields> yea, realtime would be much easier i think 08:07 < jtimon> does that sound good to you, peer programming this? I think it will be very fast that way 08:07 < cfields> you're staying for the dev meetup on the 8th/9th? 08:07 < jtimon> great, closing 7091 then 08:07 < jtimon> yes 08:08 < sipa> jtimon: don't close things too eagerly :) 08:08 < cfields> great! yea, let's plan some time then 08:10 < cfields> sipa: heh, he's not shy about re-opening :) 08:10 < sipa> i know 08:10 < GitHub19> [bitcoin] jtimon closed pull request #7091: Consensus build package (master...consensus-build) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7091 08:12 < jtimon> well I have been told to create a new one instead, but since "the lib syntax and usage is different" is going to be quite different anyway, who knows, maybe we do it in cfields' computer 08:12 < sipa> ok! 08:13 < jtimon> there's no point in have to rebase if say you do something nice like moving merkle to the consensus folder or something 08:13 < cfields> jtimon: sipa has a point though. by all means if you think you're right, fight me on it :) 08:14 -!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 08:16 < jtimon> cfields: but I agree with building the objects only once, I'm just not sure how much of 7091 as is, is incompatible with what you want to do, if you prefer to tell me that in person next week 08:17 < jtimon> and I don't close it because you have objections to it, just because I'm not going to rebase it as is if it's incompatible with building only once, which I also want for bitcoin jt 08:18 < jtimon> the code is in jtimon/libconsensus-f2 (pre-bitcoin-jt) anyway 08:19 < cfields> ok 08:37 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:55 -!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-143-143.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:22 -!- MazrimTaim [~mazrimtai@ool-18ba8bdf.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 09:32 -!- zookolaptop [~user@ip-64-134-152-1.public.wayport.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:39 -!- Amnez777- [~Amnez777@37.157.216.171] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:39 -!- Amnez777 [~Amnez777@unaffiliated/amnez777] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 09:40 -!- Amnez777 [~Amnez777@37.157.216.168] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:40 -!- Amnez777 [~Amnez777@37.157.216.168] has quit [Changing host] 09:40 -!- Amnez777 [~Amnez777@unaffiliated/amnez777] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:41 -!- MazrimTaim [~mazrimtai@24.186.139.223] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:44 -!- Amnez777- [~Amnez777@37.157.216.171] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 09:46 -!- ParadoxSpiral_ [~ParadoxSp@p508B8B1C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:49 -!- ParadoxSpiral [~ParadoxSp@p508B8293.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 10:17 -!- zookolaptop [~user@ip-64-134-152-1.public.wayport.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 10:50 -!- cocoBTC [~cocoBTC__@213.113.58.35] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:04 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 11:11 -!- raedah [~raedah@mfc0536d0.tmodns.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:17 -!- neha [~narula@mint-square.mit.edu] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 11:19 -!- neha [~narula@mint-square.mit.edu] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:23 -!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-143-143.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 11:24 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:27 -!- afk11 [~afk11@unaffiliated/afk11] has quit [Client Quit] 11:29 -!- neha [~narula@mint-square.mit.edu] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 11:30 -!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-143-143.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:35 -!- neha [~narula@mint-square.mit.edu] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:17 < GitHub29> [bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #7166: Disconnect on mempool requests from peers when over the upload limit. (master...mempool_p2p_when_overlimit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7166 12:17 -!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Quit: Lost terminal] 12:30 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:35 -!- raedah [~raedah@mfc0536d0.tmodns.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 13:13 -!- amiller [~socrates1@unaffiliated/socrates1024] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 13:18 -!- Guest2192 [~socrates1@li175-104.members.linode.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:21 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)] 13:31 -!- Guest2192 is now known as amiller 13:31 -!- amiller [~socrates1@li175-104.members.linode.com] has quit [Changing host] 13:31 -!- amiller [~socrates1@unaffiliated/socrates1024] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:31 -!- zookolaptop [~user@50.141.118.136] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:37 -!- zookolap` [~user@2601:281:8001:26aa:54b7:b2d7:9870:a514] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:38 -!- zookolaptop [~user@50.141.118.136] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 13:40 < jgarzik> Wizards, 13:40 < jgarzik> Has anybody written up designs for a "wallet" does not have complete control over the keys? 13:40 < jgarzik> A bank that cannot steal from you :) 13:41 < jgarzik> er, oops, wrong channel 13:54 -!- zookolap` is now known as zooko 14:00 -!- moley [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 14:03 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 14:22 -!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8001:26aa:54b7:b2d7:9870:a514] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 14:22 -!- treehug88 [~textual@static-108-30-103-59.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com] 14:26 -!- Thireus [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 14:27 -!- Thireus [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 14:56 -!- ParadoxSpiral_ [~ParadoxSp@p508B8B1C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: cya] 15:01 -!- Amnez777 [~Amnez777@unaffiliated/amnez777] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 15:08 -!- Amnez777 [~Amnez777@37.157.216.149] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:10 -!- moley is now known as moli 15:32 -!- Thireus [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 15:33 -!- jgarzik [~jgarzik@unaffiliated/jgarzik] has quit [Quit: up up and away! Hong Kong] 15:33 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 15:33 -!- zookolaptop [~user@2601:281:8001:26aa:54b7:b2d7:9870:a514] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:36 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:39 -!- cocoBTC [~cocoBTC__@213.113.58.35] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 15:40 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:45 -!- tulip [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:59 -!- Thireus [~Thireus@vps-92.197.170.217.stwvps.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:01 < GitHub68> [bitcoin] jameshilliard opened pull request #7167: Move TestBlockValidity into a background thread (master...TBVBackground) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7167 16:36 < phantomcircuit> so we should probably reconsider a block that's marked invalid once for every valid header on top of it (since we cant tell if the blocks on top are invalid) 16:36 < phantomcircuit> that might help with the "my system is shitty and randomly flips bits" people 16:41 < gmaxwell> I'm not really comfortable with people running wallets on such systems; not at least until we add a fair bit more protection. 16:44 < tulip> maybe just run CheckBlock in a loop until the bit happens to flip back. 17:04 < phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, fair 17:05 < phantomcircuit> tulip, har 17:20 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ynvqqyrnjrhdwitf] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 17:23 -!- Tera2342 [~Tera2342@223.207.200.223] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 17:29 -!- tulip [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has quit [] 17:35 -!- tulip- [~tulip@2a03:b0c0:3:d0::ea:3001] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:36 -!- tulip- [~tulip@2a03:b0c0:3:d0::ea:3001] has quit [Client Quit] 17:37 -!- tulip- [~tulip@2a03:b0c0:3:d0::ea:3001] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:38 -!- tulip- [~tulip@2a03:b0c0:3:d0::ea:3001] has quit [Changing host] 17:38 -!- tulip- [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:39 -!- tulip- [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has quit [Client Quit] 17:39 -!- tulp [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:51 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 17:57 -!- tulp [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has quit [Quit: tulip] 18:08 -!- tulp [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:08 -!- tulp [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has left #bitcoin-core-dev [] 18:08 -!- tulp [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:30 -!- tulp is now known as tulip 19:05 -!- CodeShark_ [~CodeShark@202.171.211.253] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 19:15 -!- zookolaptop [~user@2601:281:8001:26aa:54b7:b2d7:9870:a514] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:36 -!- aj [aj@cerulean.erisian.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:43 -!- aj [~aj@cerulean.erisian.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 20:14 < GitHub149> [bitcoin] tadasvaranavicius opened pull request #7168: Fix socket recv buffer bug (master...fix_network_buffer_bug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7168 20:23 -!- droark [~droark@caraway.whatbox.ca] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 20:35 < GitHub179> [bitcoin] tadasvaranavicius closed pull request #7168: Fix socket recv buffer bug (master...fix_network_buffer_bug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7168 20:48 -!- nkuttler [~nkuttler@unaffiliated/nkuttler] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 20:49 -!- nkuttler [~nkuttler@unaffiliated/nkuttler] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 21:02 -!- droark [~droark@caraway.whatbox.ca] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 21:06 -!- pmienk [~pmienk@c-71-227-177-179.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 21:08 -!- roasbeef [~root@104.131.26.124] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 21:20 -!- pmienk [~pmienk@c-71-227-177-179.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 21:24 -!- therealnanotube is now known as nanotube 21:28 -!- instagibbs [~instagibb@100.15.115.26] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 21:32 -!- raedah [~raedah@172.56.38.153] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 21:41 -!- instagibbs [~instagibb@100.15.115.26] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:16 -!- raedah [~raedah@172.56.38.153] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 22:20 -!- moley [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:22 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.] 22:23 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:23 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 22:32 -!- dcousens [~anon@1.136.96.226] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:33 -!- instagibbs [~instagibb@100.15.115.26] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 22:34 < dcousens> gmaxwell: rpc is still slow as *insert crude culturally relevant derogitory comment here* 22:34 < dcousens> at least, in terms of parsing the whole blockchain over it :P 22:38 -!- instagibbs [~instagibb@100.15.115.26] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:43 -!- raedah [~raedah@172.56.38.153] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:54 -!- raedah [~raedah@172.56.38.153] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 22:57 -!- droark [~droark@caraway.whatbox.ca] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:02 -!- dcousens [~anon@1.136.96.226] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 23:17 < GitHub136> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #7169: [Trivial] Disable compiler warnings about unused functions (master...20151204_scheduler_tests_warning) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7169 23:28 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:28 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has quit [Changing host] 23:28 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev