--- Day changed Tue May 17 2016 00:01 -!- dzer45 [9e4004cf@gateway/web/freenode/ip.158.64.4.207] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:02 -!- dzer45 [9e4004cf@gateway/web/freenode/ip.158.64.4.207] has quit [Client Quit] 00:06 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fpdrrhpjgeekknkg] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:11 -!- MarcoFalke [05c7b6cb@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.5.199.182.203] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:26 < warren> Hmm, why is -debug=proxy separate from -debug=net? They should probably be merged? 00:26 < GitHub137> [bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #8065: Addrman offline attempts (master...addrman_offline_attempts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8065 00:28 < GitHub54> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 5 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1f01443567b0...e2bf830bb6c1 00:28 < GitHub54> bitcoin/master ac40ed7 error10: Increase timeout waiting for pruned blk00000.dat... 00:28 < GitHub54> bitcoin/master fa72f7d MarcoFalke: [doc] Remove outdated line from listunspent RPC help, fix typo 00:28 < GitHub54> bitcoin/master fadd048 MarcoFalke: [doc] Link to clang-format in the developer notes 00:28 < GitHub58> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8038: [qa, doc] Various minor fixes (master...Mf1605-trivial12) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8038 00:34 -!- BashCo_ [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 00:58 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:01 < GitHub14> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #7884: Optimize CScript.FindAndDelete (master...optimize_FindAndDelete) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7884 01:05 -!- droark [~droark@c-24-22-36-12.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 01:05 -!- g0lem [~g0lem@50.248.81.65] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 01:05 -!- g0lem [~bhurp@50.248.81.65] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:11 -!- xiangfu [~xiangfu@111.198.29.53] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 01:18 -!- jannes [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:37 -!- donal [57c6ce7a@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.87.198.206.122] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client] 01:53 < GitHub130> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e2bf830bb6c1...5c3f8ddcaa11 01:53 < GitHub130> bitcoin/master 1475ecf EthanHeilman: Fix de-serialization bug where AddrMan is corrupted after exception... 01:53 < GitHub130> bitcoin/master 5c3f8dd Pieter Wuille: Merge #7696: Fix de-serialization bug where AddrMan is left corrupted... 01:53 < GitHub129> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #7696: Fix de-serialization bug where AddrMan is left corrupted (master...bug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7696 02:03 < petertodd> anyone know of some up-to-date UTXO age distribution graphs? (or better yet, UTXO priority distribution graphs) 02:09 < GitHub50> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8066: [qa] test_framework: Use different rpc_auth_pair for each node (master...Mf1605-qaAuthPairDiff) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8066 02:09 -!- AtashiCon [arnavion@unaffiliated/arnavion] has quit [Quit: AtashiCon] 02:09 -!- Arnavion [arnavion@unaffiliated/arnavion] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 02:11 -!- Arnavion [arnavion@unaffiliated/arnavion] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:16 -!- AtashiCon [arnavion@unaffiliated/arnavion] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:19 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:46 -!- MarcoFalke [05c7b6cb@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.5.199.182.203] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client] 02:48 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@79.242.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:28 -!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@c-73-68-232-79.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:29 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:29 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has quit [Client Quit] 03:32 -!- gabridome [~gabridome@2.43.228.254] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:59 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 04:09 -!- jron [~okok@ec2-54-161-129-226.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 04:10 -!- jron [~okok@ec2-54-161-129-226.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:29 -!- gabridome [~gabridome@2.43.228.254] has quit [Quit: gabridome] 04:38 -!- jtimon [~quassel@162.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:39 -!- cryptapus_ [~cyptapus@unaffiliated/cryptapus] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:43 -!- cryptapus_ is now known as cryptapus 04:52 -!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@c-73-68-232-79.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 04:59 -!- fengling [~fengling@111.198.29.53] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.4] 05:02 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 05:07 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 05:07 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:04 -!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8301:1f00:2161:6613:8308:eab] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:04 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:05 -!- donal [57c6ce7a@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.87.198.206.122] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:11 -!- pet_rock [~pet_rock@workgroup.ucsd.edu] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:37 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 06:40 -!- tom3 [~tom@unaffiliated/tommc] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:45 -!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8301:1f00:2161:6613:8308:eab] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 06:50 -!- cryptapus [~cyptapus@unaffiliated/cryptapus] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 06:53 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:55 -!- cryptapus [~cyptapus@66.119.84.15] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:55 -!- cryptapus [~cyptapus@66.119.84.15] has quit [Changing host] 06:55 -!- cryptapus [~cyptapus@unaffiliated/cryptapus] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:59 -!- tom3 is now known as TomMc 07:16 -!- petertodd [~pete@ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 07:17 -!- petertodd [~pete@ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:28 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Read error: No route to host] 07:28 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:40 -!- bysherper [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:43 -!- earlest [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 07:45 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@79.242.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 07:47 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@79.242.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:47 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@79.242.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 07:48 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@79.242.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:13 -!- cryptapus [~cyptapus@unaffiliated/cryptapus] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 08:29 -!- cryptapus [~cyptapus@unaffiliated/cryptapus] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:45 -!- zooko [~user@67.51.154.114] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:47 -!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@c-73-68-232-79.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:49 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 08:58 -!- zooko` [~user@173-8-240-177-Colorado.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:01 -!- zooko [~user@67.51.154.114] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 09:08 -!- spudowiar is now known as [` 09:08 -!- [` is now known as `] 09:09 -!- `] is now known as spudowiar 09:10 -!- earlest [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:13 -!- bysherper [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 09:38 -!- zooko [~user@173-8-240-177-Colorado.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:42 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:53 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 10:04 -!- zooko` [~user@173-8-240-177-Colorado.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 10:04 -!- zooko [~user@173-8-240-177-Colorado.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 10:14 -!- jtimon [~quassel@162.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 10:26 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 10:31 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 10:40 -!- zooko` [~user@2601:281:8000:8387:2161:6613:8308:eab] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 10:50 -!- zooko` [~user@2601:281:8000:8387:2161:6613:8308:eab] has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)] 10:51 -!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8000:8387:2161:6613:8308:eab] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:12 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@79.242.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 11:15 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@79.242.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:17 -!- kadoban [~mud@unaffiliated/kadoban] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:19 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@79.242.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 11:21 < BlueMatt> sipa: re: std::unordered_map hasher creation: funny, I cant find any references to it online :( 11:22 < sipa> BlueMatt: it follows from type generality :) 11:22 < sipa> BlueMatt: you can pass in a hasher type that has no no-arg constructor 11:22 < sipa> so unordered_map cannot construct it on its own 11:23 < sipa> so you need to pass it in 11:23 < BlueMatt> wait, how does that work? when passing it in as a class reference unordered_map has to be able to create it somehow? 11:24 < sipa> explicit unordered_map( size_type bucket_count, const Hash& hash = Hash(), const KeyEqual& equal = KeyEqual(), const Allocator& alloc = Allocator() ); 11:24 < sipa> is the constructor 11:24 < BlueMatt> ohhhh, oops, yea, missed that 11:31 -!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@c-73-68-232-79.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit [] 11:32 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@167.225.61.94.rev.vodafone.pt] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:36 -!- pedrobranco [~pedrobran@167.225.61.94.rev.vodafone.pt] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 11:44 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 12:00 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:19 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/spudowiar] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 12:21 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:22 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has quit [Client Quit] 12:25 -!- phish [~phish@unaffiliated/phish-] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 12:28 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 12:28 -!- pan-tester [~pan_teste@46.166.137.245] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:29 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:32 -!- pan-tester [~pan_teste@46.166.137.245] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 12:36 -!- cryptapus [~cyptapus@unaffiliated/cryptapus] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 12:36 -!- cryptapus_ [~cyptapus@unaffiliated/cryptapus] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:41 < Chris_Stewart_5> Question about BIP113, if I have a locktime transaction I need the locktime on that tx to be < the median block timestamp for the last 11 blocks correct? 12:41 -!- cryptapus_ [~cyptapus@unaffiliated/cryptapus] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 12:49 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:00 -!- pavel_ [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:00 -!- pavel_ [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 13:00 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:06 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 13:10 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [] 13:15 -!- bysherper [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:18 -!- earlest [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 13:18 -!- earlest [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:21 -!- bysherper [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 13:27 -!- cryptapus_afk is now known as cryptapus 13:31 < gmaxwell> Jeff Garzik is attacking the project's work again, https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/732648223823695874 13:33 < gmaxwell> I think it's doubtful that he's ever thought about the deployment implications of SW as a hardfork, having actually done it in elements alpha and found it barely workable there-- because doing it the HF way so throughly destroys all software compatiblity-- I continue to be surprised at the level of ignorance displayed here. 13:35 < gmaxwell> I'm also disappointed to see yet another transparently political move-- which is all I could characterize someone clammering to halt segwit when it's relatively uncontroversial (except emong those trying to use the lack of it as a wedge to force other rule changes onto the network, like Jeff.)-- while at the same time he supported (and continues to support) trying to force a hardfork onto the sy 13:35 < gmaxwell> stem using a much lower criteria of 75% hashpower. 13:36 < gmaxwell> I've been contacting Jeff for months in private raising my concerns about his unproductive tyrades-- seemingly motivated by creating drama to bring attention to his business-- while he continues to contribute no ongoing technical work the the bitcoin ecosystem. Most of my emails have gone unresponded or not meaningfully responded. 13:38 < gmaxwell> https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/729511340008611840 last week Jeff was offering his Bloq company as a provider for "segwit roadmap with dates"; at the time I thought it was inexplicable considering AFAIK no one with Bloq has been contributing to segwit development/testing at all. With today's comment it seems like it was an request for proposal for payment to attack and delay segwit. 13:44 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/spudowiar] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:54 -!- bysherper [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:54 < gmaxwell> I was reading this: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/greenaddress-is-first-bitcoin-wallet-to-launch-replace-by-fee-bitcoin-transactions-miner-adoption-slow-1463516896 13:54 < gmaxwell> and saw the "Editors note: Shortly before publication, Bitcoin Core developers pointed out that an RBF-notification might be added soon, after all." and was confused by that. 13:55 < gmaxwell> Whats the context? I think based on petertodd's measurements saying that a subset of transactions are replacable would be misleading. All unconfirmed transactions a fairly reliably replacable. 13:56 -!- Don_John [~Don@ip72-211-182-139.tc.ph.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:56 -!- Don_John [~Don@ip72-211-182-139.tc.ph.cox.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 13:57 -!- earlest [~denetrabu@96.93.57.150] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 14:01 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 14:02 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 14:03 < btcdrak> gmaxwell: AaronvanW (the author) is in here. 14:05 < AaronvanW> that's what jonasschnelli told me 14:05 < AaronvanW> unless I misunderstood 14:05 < AaronvanW> also in this channel iirx 14:05 < AaronvanW> iirc 14:05 < AaronvanW> yesterday 14:07 < AaronvanW> (I don't think I misunderstood) 14:08 < instagibbs> s/RBF-notification/bip-125 replaceable notification/ 14:08 < instagibbs> it's a bit of a mouthful though 14:09 < instagibbs> RBF-signaling, perhaps 14:10 < btcdrak> aaronvanw: gmaxwell: There is a PR open for it https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7817 14:20 < TD-Linux> it's kind of hard to convey "you shouldn't accept this yet" vs "you REALLY shouldn't accept this yet" 15:02 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:06 -!- musalbas [~musalbas@2001:bc8:30c2::] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:07 -!- musalbas- [~musalbas@2001:bc8:30c2::] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:09 < luke-jr> petertodd: your NACK there is IMO incomplete. in theory, if you + others sign an outgoing tx (eg, CoinJoin), it can still be double-spent by those others 15:10 < luke-jr> AaronvanW: probably should stress the "might" there. I don't think such notification will get sufficient agreement to merge. 15:12 -!- gevs [~greg@unaffiliated/gevs] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 15:14 -!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 15:25 -!- gevs [~greg@unaffiliated/gevs] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:29 < gmaxwell> AaronvanW: oh, I'm not suggesting that you had anything wrong. 15:29 < gmaxwell> AaronvanW: only perhaps that someone responded to you without having discussed it or thought it through. 15:31 < gmaxwell> aaronvanw: at least the form shown in the example of another wallet with a red warning I'd oppose as materially misleading and likely to result in funds loss. 15:44 -!- cryptapus is now known as cryptapus_afk 15:56 -!- AaronvanW [~ewout@172pc231.sshunet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 15:56 -!- AaronvanW [~ewout@172pc231.sshunet.nl] has quit [Changing host] 15:56 -!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:01 -!- YolandiVisser is now known as justanothesure 16:01 -!- justanothesure is now known as justanotheruser 16:05 -!- PRab [~chatzilla@c-68-62-95-247.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:23 -!- droark [~droark@c-24-22-36-12.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:24 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 16:28 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:45 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)] 16:50 -!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 16:50 -!- alpalp [~allen@104-54-235-28.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:50 -!- alpalp [~allen@104-54-235-28.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Changing host] 16:50 -!- alpalp [~allen@unaffiliated/alpalp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:58 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:59 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has quit [Client Quit] 17:01 -!- PRab [~chatzilla@c-68-62-95-247.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:47 < petertodd> luke-jr: but that's unrelated to the opt-in rbf detection; I agree that in general we want to display doublespends 17:48 < luke-jr> petertodd: well, I mean if we're displaying "replacable" as an indication 17:51 < petertodd> luke-jr: right, but I'm only talking about incoming txs 18:05 -!- dermoth__ [~thomas@dsl-66-36-159-8.mtl.aei.ca] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 18:06 -!- dermoth__ [~thomas@dsl-66-36-159-8.mtl.aei.ca] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:19 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 18:20 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:21 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fpdrrhpjgeekknkg] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 18:29 -!- alpalp [~allen@unaffiliated/alpalp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 18:30 -!- alpalp [~allen@unaffiliated/alpalp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:30 < GitHub150> [bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #8067: travis: use slim generic image, and some fixups (master...travis-generic-image) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8067 18:33 -!- molz [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:36 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 18:41 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 18:44 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 18:49 < GitHub3> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #8068: Compact Blocks (master...udp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8068 18:53 -!- alpalp [~allen@unaffiliated/alpalp] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 18:54 -!- alpalp [~allen@unaffiliated/alpalp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 19:01 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 19:05 -!- Michail1 [~michail@michail.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 19:07 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 19:23 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 19:25 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 19:34 -!- Michail1 [~michail@michail.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 19:37 -!- TomMc [~tom@unaffiliated/tommc] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 19:38 -!- alpalp [~allen@unaffiliated/alpalp] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:40 -!- Michail1 [~michail@michail.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 19:50 -!- Michail1 [~michail@michail.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 20:21 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 20:22 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 20:44 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 20:45 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 21:17 -!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 21:18 < BlueMatt> sipa/gmaxwell 21:18 < BlueMatt> so I was just going back and checking, and the new varint stuff doesnt help anywhere that matters 21:19 -!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 21:20 < BlueMatt> its an extra few kb in getblocktxn, but thats not really critical-path since that is still one-per-block-per-node 21:20 < BlueMatt> its only like 10 or 20 bytes in cmpctblock, which is the all-important potentially-multiple-times-per-block 21:22 < BlueMatt> gmaxwell: since you're the one with no b/w at home, how much would you care if there is an extra few kb (if even that) in getblocktxn? 21:23 < BlueMatt> somehow I had thought it was a savings in cmpctblock 21:24 < sipa> i'm fine with sticking to the existing varint scheme 21:24 < luke-jr> "one" <.< 21:24 < luke-jr> BlueMatt: How is blocktxn not part of the critical path? 21:27 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 21:27 -!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8000:8387:2161:6613:8308:eab] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 21:56 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 21:57 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:05 -!- jl2012_ [uid133844@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-zqffegomkfdlrtbk] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:11 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:11 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has quit [Changing host] 22:11 -!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:11 -!- Pat_Boy [xyz@192.99.249.215] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:13 -!- Evel-Knievel [~Evel-Knie@d5152f744.static.telenet.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 22:13 -!- amiller [~socrates1@unaffiliated/socrates1024] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 22:13 -!- jl2012 [uid133844@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-riqkwbicbtslafyr] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 22:13 -!- da2ce7_mobile [~da2ce7@opentransactions/dev/da2ce7] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 22:13 -!- PatBoy [xyz@192.99.249.215] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 22:13 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/spudowiar] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 22:13 -!- JackH [~Jack@79-73-185-113.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 22:13 -!- Pat_Boy is now known as PatBoy 22:13 -!- jl2012_ is now known as jl2012 22:13 -!- Evel-Knievel [~Evel-Knie@d5152f744.static.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:14 -!- JackH [~Jack@79-73-185-113.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:15 -!- amiller_ [~socrates1@li175-104.members.linode.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:16 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/spudowiar] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:17 -!- da2ce7_mobile [~da2ce7@opentransactions/dev/da2ce7] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:24 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 22:25 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 22:28 -!- pet_rock [~pet_rock@workgroup.ucsd.edu] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 22:57 -!- tErik_mc [~tErik@unaffiliated/terik] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:00 < BlueMatt> luke-jr: I said getblocktxn 23:00 < BlueMatt> luke-jr: meh, do you care about an extra few kb once per block? 23:00 < luke-jr> right, but that's before blocktxn 23:00 < BlueMatt> indeed? 23:01 < luke-jr> I don't know if it matters; it may not. 23:02 < BlueMatt> it'll be an extra packet or two 23:02 < BlueMatt> and it doesnt effect udp stuff 23:13 -!- gribble [~gribble@unaffiliated/nanotube/bot/gribble] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 23:20 -!- jannes [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 23:22 -!- gribble [~gribble@unaffiliated/nanotube/bot/gribble] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:26 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 23:26 -!- gabridome [~gabridome@host53-42-dynamic.9-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:27 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:38 -!- gabridome [~gabridome@host53-42-dynamic.9-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has quit [Quit: gabridome] 23:43 < jonasschnelli> luke-jr, petertodd: would you silently ignore (list as normal) incoming RBF txes? 23:44 < luke-jr> jonasschnelli: sure. they are no different in any practical sense than any other incoming txs 23:44 < jonasschnelli> except that they can be replaced.. :) 23:44 < luke-jr> all unconfirmed txs can be replaced. 23:45 < jonasschnelli> Sure. But they don't signal it explicit. 23:45 < luke-jr> irrelevant. 23:45 < jonasschnelli> So why do we have RBF then? 23:45 < luke-jr> because politics 23:45 < luke-jr> if you mean BIP 125 23:45 < luke-jr> RBF in general is just common sense really 23:46 < luke-jr> double spending was always easy for the criminal uses. RBF makes it practical for legitimate users too. 23:47 < luke-jr> BIP 125 is necessary to get around anti-RBF trolls. 23:48 < jonasschnelli> I don't care about politics and trolls. All I care is about a mempool rule that was written down in a Bip (125) and if a tx matches that bip rule (nSequence), it should be visible somewhere (can also be in the tx details once you doubleclick a tx). 23:50 < luke-jr> I don't care if you have the unenforcable nSequence stuff in the tx debug info window you get by double clicking it. I just don't think it should be presented to end users and relevant. 23:50 < luke-jr> mempool policy is not a rule, and is a per-node decision 23:50 < jonasschnelli> I kinda agree. 0-conf should be listed a 0-conf... maybe a slightly different icon (but same color attributes)? 23:51 < luke-jr> there are plenty of nodes and even some miners who do RBF ignoring BIP 125 signalling, and that's not a problem. 23:51 < luke-jr> there's no such thing as 0-conf, it's unconfirmed ;) 23:52 < luke-jr> unconfirmed should of course be presented differently from confirmed, but AFAIK we already do that 23:52 < jonasschnelli> luke-jr: requesting BIP number assignment for Peer-to-Peer Communication Encryption (https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/362/files) (https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-April/012599.html) 23:52 < luke-jr> jonasschnelli: just encryption? or auth too? 23:52 < jonasschnelli> Number assignment for "Authentication" is not required at this point. 23:52 < jonasschnelli> (needs further discussion) 23:53 < luke-jr> k, 151 for encryption 23:53 < jonasschnelli> Super. Thanks! 23:53 < luke-jr> I guess split the PR up so 151 can be merged alone..? 23:55 < jonasschnelli> Yes. I'll remove the auth BIP from the PR and update the enc bip