--- Day changed Thu Jun 01 2017 00:04 -!- timothy [tredaelli@redhat/timothy] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:12 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:17 -!- vicenteH [~user@135.234.15.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:22 -!- justan0theruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:23 -!- justanotheruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 00:33 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@p5DC47E9A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 00:33 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@p5DC47E9A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Client Quit] 00:52 -!- JackH [~laptop@217.149.140.177] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 00:59 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:00 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-52.dc.dc.cox.net] has quit [Quit: .] 01:00 -!- Aaronvan_ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:02 -!- Cory [~Cory@unaffiliated/cory] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] 01:03 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 01:04 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@dhcp-215-137.vpn.tu-berlin.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:06 -!- JackH [~laptop@212.78.169.180] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:08 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-52.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:09 -!- Cory [~Cory@unaffiliated/cory] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:14 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10459: I found I needed to use gmake on FreeBSD 10.3 (0.14...patch-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10459 01:25 -!- ndrchvzz [5aae022d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.90.174.2.45] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 01:30 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kfdmqypobbjivmqp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:33 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:35 -!- Aaronva__ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 01:37 -!- Aaronvan_ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 01:38 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 01:41 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #10495: contrib: Update location of seeds.txt (master...2017_06_seeds_source) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10495 01:42 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/18ba984140be...10e8c0a298b3 01:42 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1983c87 Wladimir J. van der Laan: devtools: Retry after signing fails in github-merge... 01:42 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 10e8c0a Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10486: devtools: Retry after signing fails in github-merge... 01:43 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10486: devtools: Retry after signing fails in github-merge (master...2017_05_githubmerge_sign_error) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10486 01:48 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/10e8c0a298b3...ef2d062c9f72 01:48 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1b6602f Russell Yanofsky: Fix bumpfee rpc "errors" return value 01:48 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master ef2d062 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10450: Fix bumpfee rpc "errors" return value... 01:49 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10450: Fix bumpfee rpc "errors" return value (master...pr/berr) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10450 01:51 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ef2d062c9f72...f259263a7b11 01:51 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master cd5622d Wladimir J. van der Laan: Make bitcoind invalid argument error message specific... 01:51 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f259263 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10447: Make bitcoind invalid argument error message specific... 01:51 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10447: Make bitcoind invalid argument error message specific (master...2017_05_bitcoind_commandline_error) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10447 01:54 -!- owowo [~ovovo@unaffiliated/ovovo] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 02:04 -!- Lauda [~quassel@unaffiliated/lauda] has quit [Quit: DeepSpace took me hostage.] 02:05 -!- Lauda [~quassel@2a06:8ec0:3::1:b224] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:05 -!- Lauda [~quassel@2a06:8ec0:3::1:b224] has quit [Changing host] 02:05 -!- Lauda [~quassel@unaffiliated/lauda] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:05 -!- Lauda [~quassel@unaffiliated/lauda] has quit [Client Quit] 02:06 -!- Lauda [~quassel@unaffiliated/lauda] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:12 -!- riemann [~riemann@84-10-11-234.static.chello.pl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:24 -!- JackH [~laptop@212.78.169.180] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 02:30 -!- btcdrak [uid230524@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-bllegxwipwhsbwnx] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 02:35 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:38 -!- JackH [~laptop@46.231.18.66] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:53 -!- tunafizz [~tuna@c-71-207-56-72.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 02:54 -!- tunafizz [~tuna@c-71-207-56-72.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 02:54 -!- cysm_ [cysm@gateway/shell/elitebnc/x-pwfjukivjycctwta] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 02:59 -!- cysm_ [cysm@gateway/shell/elitebnc/x-gtpdfltrjgahapaz] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:01 -!- owowo [~ovovo@unaffiliated/ovovo] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:02 -!- jtimon [~quassel@117.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:12 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 03:12 -!- jtimon [~quassel@117.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 03:15 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:23 -!- beatrootfarmer [~Beatrootg@2a02:c7d:12e:100:8016:a8d9:a35c:b6e] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:27 -!- goatturneer [~Beatrootg@2a02:c7d:12e:100:605a:ee10:7570:f89c] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 03:31 -!- jannes [~jannes@095-097-246-234.static.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:38 -!- Aaronva__ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 03:41 -!- SopaXorzTaker [~SopaXorzT@unaffiliated/sopaxorztaker] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 03:42 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 03:44 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] benma opened pull request #10496: Add Binds, WhiteBinds, Whitelistedrange to CConnman::Options (master...connman_options) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10496 03:56 -!- SopaXorzTaker [~SopaXorzT@unaffiliated/sopaxorztaker] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:00 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f259263a7b11...6a38b79de439 04:00 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master ac9cd95 Wladimir J. van der Laan: contrib: Update location of seeds.txt... 04:00 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6a38b79 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10495: contrib: Update location of seeds.txt... 04:00 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10495: contrib: Update location of seeds.txt (master...2017_06_seeds_source) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10495 04:10 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 04:16 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:19 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6a38b79de439...b6b150b01668 04:19 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 16d94d3 James Evans: Fixing typo in rpcdump.cpp 04:19 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b6b150b Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10469: Fixing typo in rpcdump.cpp... 04:20 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10469: Fixing typo in rpcdump.cpp (master...patch-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10469 04:24 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b6b150b01668...cb1716acc720 04:24 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b6fbfc2 Cory Fields: net: only enforce the services required to connect... 04:24 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master cb1716a Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10441: net: only enforce expected services for half of outgoing connections... 04:25 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10441: net: only enforce expected services for half of outgoing connections (master...serviceflags-required) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10441 04:25 -!- str4d [~str4d@27.110.123.92] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:30 -!- elkalamar [~elkalamar@84.126.69.179.dyn.user.ono.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 04:43 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 04:47 -!- Guest60055 [~john@host86-146-145-234.range86-146.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 04:47 -!- dermoth [~thomas@dsl-199-102-159-217.mtl.aei.ca] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 04:48 -!- dermoth [~thomas@dsl-66-36-135-165.mtl.aei.ca] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 04:53 -!- RubenSomsen [~RubenSoms@1.217.138.142] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 04:55 -!- JackH [~laptop@46.231.18.66] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 04:59 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 05:02 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 05:02 -!- goatturneer [~Beatrootg@2a02:c7d:12e:100:f9b0:b671:6c77:f39d] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 05:03 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has quit [Client Quit] 05:05 -!- beatrootfarmer [~Beatrootg@2a02:c7d:12e:100:8016:a8d9:a35c:b6e] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 05:07 -!- talmai [~T@c-24-147-97-55.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 05:12 -!- Guest60055 [~john@host86-146-145-234.range86-146.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 05:15 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] benma opened pull request #10497: remove the PAIRTYPE macro (master...pairtype) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10497 05:20 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.14: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/9e3ad500780b284765654cff4144451c7fa5ef6b 05:20 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.14 9e3ad50 Cory Fields: net: only enforce the services required to connect... 05:25 -!- rilos [~rilos@unaffiliated/rilos] has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…] 05:26 -!- Guest60055 [~john@host86-146-145-234.range86-146.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 05:35 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10498: Use static_cast instead of C-style casts for non-fundamental types (master...static_cast) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10498 05:36 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@p98110-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 05:40 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@173-31-39-168.client.mchsi.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:01 -!- kadoban [~mud@unaffiliated/kadoban] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 06:01 -!- kadoban [~mud@unaffiliated/kadoban] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:02 -!- Guest60055 [~john@host86-146-145-234.range86-146.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:05 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/cb1716acc720...27b99312bf09 06:05 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master afc693d Luke Dashjr: contrib/init/bitcoind.openrcconf: Don't disable wallet by default... 06:05 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 27b9931 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10451: contrib/init/bitcoind.openrcconf: Don't disable wallet by default... 06:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10451: contrib/init/bitcoind.openrcconf: Don't disable wallet by default (master...openrc_wallet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10451 06:09 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@dhcp-215-137.vpn.tu-berlin.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 06:13 < instagibbs> wumpus, if you're still looking for things to merge :P https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10475 06:18 < timothy> hi 06:19 < timothy> who maintains dev.bitcoincore.org ? 06:20 -!- jtimon [~quassel@117.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:20 -!- fanquake [~fanquake@unaffiliated/fanquake] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:21 < fanquake> instagibbs I'm sure it'll get picked up tonight 06:22 < instagibbs> fanquake, "tonight"? honest question, is there a method to the madness? :) 06:22 < instagibbs> Other than ad hoc scanning 06:25 < fanquake> instagibbs dev meeting tonight isn't there? Normally a time to get some merging done 06:28 -!- talmai [~T@c-24-147-97-55.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: mining] 06:31 < instagibbs> oh yes, I always forget it's irc meeting day 06:32 < fanquake> I probably wont be at the dev meeting, but would like opinions on Qt5.9.0 for 0.15. Compilation (brew, osx) looks ok so far, depends patches will need some fixes. Interested to see the results of the new -optimize-size option; claims of 5-20% binary size decrease. We should also be able to pass more -no-* flags to cut more crap out of our build. 06:36 -!- Guest60055 [~john@host86-146-145-234.range86-146.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 06:38 -!- Guest60055 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:39 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@dhcp-214-203.vpn.tu-berlin.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:40 -!- talmai [~T@c-24-147-97-55.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:40 -!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:306:b8e0:8160:c092:439b:71e3:67d1] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:43 -!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@239.11.24.31.ftth.as8758.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:50 -!- nemgun [~nemgun@105.101.156.143] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 06:54 -!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@239.11.24.31.ftth.as8758.net] has quit [] 06:57 -!- str4d [~str4d@27.110.123.92] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 06:59 -!- btcdrak [uid230524@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-bgdhwubmdwfqydzl] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:00 -!- talmai [~T@c-24-147-97-55.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: mining] 07:01 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@dhcp-214-203.vpn.tu-berlin.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 07:05 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/27b99312bf09...64beb1317912 07:05 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 32325a3 Jonas Schnelli: [Qt] hide bump context menu action if tx already has been bumped 07:05 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6d7104c Jonas Schnelli: [Qt] make sure transaction table entry gets updated after bump 07:05 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 64beb13 Jonas Schnelli: Merge #10449: Overhaul Qt fee bumper... 07:05 < jonasschnelli> cfields: ping 07:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #10449: Overhaul Qt fee bumper (master...2016/05/bump_qt_overhaul) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10449 07:11 -!- RubenSomsen [~RubenSoms@1.217.138.142] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:14 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:17 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has quit [Client Quit] 07:23 -!- talmai [~T@c-24-147-97-55.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:30 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-240-13-215-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:43 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@p5DC47E9A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:49 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@p5DC47E9A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 07:49 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@dhcp-214-138.vpn.tu-berlin.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 07:52 -!- Squidicuz [~squid@pool-72-74-34-138.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 07:58 -!- riemann [~riemann@84-10-11-234.static.chello.pl] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 07:59 -!- Squidicuz [~squid@pool-72-74-34-138.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:01 -!- Squidicc [~squid@pool-72-74-34-138.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:01 -!- Squidicuz [~squid@pool-72-74-34-138.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 08:11 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@dhcp-214-138.vpn.tu-berlin.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:17 -!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:306:b8e0:8160:c092:439b:71e3:67d1] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 08:20 -!- beatrootfarmer [~Beatrootg@2a02:c7d:12e:100:d92c:f9:82fc:413] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:20 -!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@107-142-8-22.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:24 -!- goatturneer [~Beatrootg@2a02:c7d:12e:100:f9b0:b671:6c77:f39d] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:26 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 08:34 -!- goatturneer [~Beatrootg@2.126.80.59] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:38 -!- beatrootfarmer [~Beatrootg@2a02:c7d:12e:100:d92c:f9:82fc:413] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 08:43 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:44 -!- Dizzle [~dizzle@108.171.182.16] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:45 -!- abpa [~abpa@96-82-80-28-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:50 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:51 -!- Aaronvan_ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:51 -!- goatturneer [~Beatrootg@2.126.80.59] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 08:51 -!- talmai [~T@c-24-147-97-55.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: mining] 08:53 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:56 -!- Dyaheon [~Dya@a91-156-192-39.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:56 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:57 -!- fanquake [~fanquake@unaffiliated/fanquake] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 08:57 -!- Dyaheon [~Dya@a91-156-192-39.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 08:57 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #10500: Avoid CWalletTx copies in GetAddressBalances and GetAddressGroupings (master...pr/wtxcopy) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10500 09:00 -!- timothy [tredaelli@redhat/timothy] has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!] 09:22 -!- tiagotrs_ [~tiago@p5DC47E9A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:33 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-52.dc.dc.cox.net] has quit [Quit: .] 09:40 -!- tiagotrs_ [~tiago@p5DC47E9A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 09:42 -!- Guest60055 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 09:42 -!- Guest44371 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:46 -!- Guest44371 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 09:47 -!- Squidicc [~squid@pool-72-74-34-138.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 09:49 -!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@107-142-8-22.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 09:56 < jtimon> mhmm FAIL: qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt on master 64beb13... Merge #10449: Overhaul Qt fee bumper 09:56 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10449 | Overhaul Qt fee bumper by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #10449 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 09:59 -!- timothy [~tredaelli@redhat/timothy] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 09:59 < jtimon> seems lie #10449 is to blame since this passes: 27b99312 Merge #10451: contrib/init/bitcoind.openrcconf: Don't disable wallet by default 09:59 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10449 | Overhaul Qt fee bumper by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #10449 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 09:59 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10451 | contrib/init/bitcoind.openrcconf: Dont disable wallet by default by luke-jr · Pull Request #10451 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 09:59 -!- elkalamar [~elkalamar@84.126.69.179.dyn.user.ono.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 10:00 -!- Guest44371 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 10:02 -!- Squidicuz [~squid@pool-72-74-34-138.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 10:06 -!- Squidicuz [~squid@pool-72-74-34-138.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 10:07 -!- Squidicuz [~squid@pool-72-74-34-138.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 10:14 < instagibbs> can someone explain to me where/how "--without-gui" is consumed? 10:15 < instagibbs> grepping for it fails :) 10:15 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] benma opened pull request #10501: remove some unused functions (master...unusedfuncs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10501 10:17 < wumpus> timothy: " who maintains dev.bitcoincore.org ?" cfields should have access at least, why? 10:17 < timothy> nothing, solved :) 10:17 < wumpus> instagibbs: it gets converted to --with-gui=no IIRC 10:19 < wumpus> --(with|without)-x and --(enable|disable)-x are standard autoconf arguments that have a special handler construct, don't know by heart how it's called though 10:19 < instagibbs> oh. there we go 10:19 < instagibbs> thanks 10:19 < Dizzle> Yep, part of the autoconf/automake stuff. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/ed09dd3f5a87db570152ebbec4d9a489e414deed/build-aux/m4/bitcoin_qt.m4#L55 10:20 < instagibbs> I knew that it was part of autoconf, which is why I asked, because it's a black box to me :) 10:21 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/64beb1317912...39039b12a744 10:22 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f128f78 Gregory Sanders: getmempool mempoolminfee is a BTC/KB feerate 10:22 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 39039b1 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10475: [RPC] getmempoolinfo mempoolminfee is a BTC/KB feerate... 10:22 * sipa loves kelvin bytes 10:23 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10475: [RPC] getmempoolinfo mempoolminfee is a BTC/KB feerate (master...poolfeerate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10475 10:23 < wumpus> Dizzle: exactly 10:24 < Dizzle> instagibbs: the source I linked deals with the flag, sets the bitcoin_enable_qt vars you'll see referenced throughout the rest of the configure/make stuff. 10:26 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #10502: scripted-diff: Remove BOOST_FOREACH, Q_FOREACH and PAIRTYPE (master...b15-boost-foreach) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10502 10:33 < gmaxwell> holy crap Block Filter Digest profiling post on bitcoin-dev. 10:51 -!- timothy [~tredaelli@redhat/timothy] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 10:59 -!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:306:b8e0:8160:d81b:6442:1d69:7ebf] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:15 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #10503: Use REJECT_DUPLICATE for already known and conflicted txn (master...more61duplicate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10503 11:16 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-52.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:28 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@173-31-39-168.client.mchsi.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 11:39 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@173-31-39-168.client.mchsi.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:47 < gmaxwell> Meeting in 12 minutes. 11:50 < wumpus> yep 11:51 < btcdrak> I might make it this time 11:52 < jtimon> I suggest we start with the priority PRs topic, that tends to be short and spring other topics 11:53 < wumpus> jtimon: ok, let's do that 11:54 < jtimon> mhm, weird error https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/237624588 11:56 < BlueMatt> cfields: is out dealing with life things, apparently 11:57 < cfields> BlueMatt: nevermind, i made it! 11:57 < BlueMatt> lolk 11:57 < btcdrak> jtimon: just needs to be restarted 11:57 -!- ndrchvzz [5aae022d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.90.174.2.45] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 11:57 < cfields> jonasschnelli: sorry, it's moving day (apparently), wasn't around earlier. You around to discuss after the meeting? 11:59 < jonasschnelli> cfields: I guess I fall to sleep in 1h. But we may make it tomorrow. :) 11:59 < jonasschnelli> No hurry 12:00 < gmaxwell> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier 12:00 < jonasschnelli> But love to hear how we can solve the wallet-tool building 12:00 < cfields> jonasschnelli: ah, ok 12:00 < sdaftuar> hi 12:00 < jonasschnelli> hi 12:00 < btcdrak> hi 12:00 < morcos> i'm kind of here for the next 25 mins 12:00 < sipa> present 12:00 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-52.dc.dc.cox.net] has quit [Quit: .] 12:00 < wumpus> #startmeeting 12:00 < lightningbot> Meeting started Thu Jun 1 19:00:41 2017 UTC. The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 12:00 < lightningbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 12:00 < achow101> hi 12:01 < wumpus> proposed topics? 12:01 < luke-jr> suggested topic: safe DoS handling around softforks 12:02 < wumpus> ok, we'll start with high-priority review as suggested by jtimon 12:02 < gmaxwell> It was proposed we talk about PRs first. 12:02 < wumpus> #topic High-priority review PRs 12:02 < jonasschnelli> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/8 12:02 < wumpus> anything to add this week? 12:02 < jonasschnelli> Please review HD auto restore... I whised we have this in 0.15. But seems to get late: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10240 12:02 < jtimon> mine still is #10339 (which contains #9717 ) 12:02 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10339 | Optimization: Calculate block hash less times by jtimon · Pull Request #10339 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:02 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9717 | Pow: Remove fCheckPOW from CheckBlockHeader by jtimon · Pull Request #9717 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:03 < jtimon> did squash and the requested rename 12:03 < cfields> wumpus: I _promise_ to review your unix socket changes this week. They slipped off my radar, but I'm aware they're painful rebases. 12:03 < gmaxwell> Where have we gotten on multiwallet? 12:03 < jonasschnelli> luke-jr: there are compile issues 12:03 < sipa> i'm currently squashing #10195, after that i'd like to request review on #10321 12:03 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10195 | Switch chainstate db and cache to per-txout model by sipa · Pull Request #10195 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:03 < jonasschnelli> Gitian won't compile I guess because of the test fixtures 12:03 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10321 | Use FastRandomContext for all tests by sipa · Pull Request #10321 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:04 < luke-jr> hmm 12:04 < jonasschnelli> Once that is fixed, I guess we can merge luke-jr first step 12:04 < jonasschnelli> But ideally we work on runtime-wallet loading 12:04 < jonasschnelli> shouldn't be that hard 12:05 < jtimon> #7729 needs rebase 12:05 < wumpus> cfields: thanks! 12:05 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7729 | rpc: introduce label API for wallet by laanwj · Pull Request #7729 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:05 < cfields> jonasschnelli: if i'm understanding correctly, that's the tl;dr for fixing the wallet tool build issue as well :) 12:05 < cfields> (my proposal, anyway) 12:05 < wumpus> jtimon: yes 12:05 < jonasschnelli> cfields: wallet-tool build issue could solve salvage, upgrade, etc. 12:06 < jonasschnelli> currently multiwallet does only allow all-or-nothing rescans/salvages,zaps, etc. 12:06 < gmaxwell> 7729 was mostly API review. I kind of got lost on it becuase I didn't see how the api can be cleanly extended to multiple lables per transaction, but I keep forgetting about it to go read in again what the api was in order to prodice more commentary. :( 12:06 < cfields> i see 12:06 < kanzure> hi. 12:06 < jtimon> just giving heads up, also #10044's tests are failing 12:06 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10044 | Run functional tests in `make check` by jnewbery · Pull Request #10044 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:07 < gmaxwell> jonasschnelli: I think it was proposed to make salvage/zap only work when one wallet was loaded. 12:07 < wumpus> gmaxwell: multiple labels per transactions simply wasn't a goal there 12:07 < gmaxwell> which seemed like a fine stopgap to me. 12:07 < wumpus> gmaxwell: I'm fine with doing it later, but let's not scope creep this, it's already getting late 12:07 < jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: Seems reasonable. 12:08 < gmaxwell> wumpus: I understand; I am not trying to suggest that it should do that, but not sure if the api can be cleanly extended later to support that. 12:08 < wumpus> the goal of #7729 was explicitly to offer the same API as the GUI has for labels 12:08 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7729 | rpc: introduce label API for wallet by laanwj · Pull Request #7729 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:08 < wumpus> to be able to drop the account system 12:08 < wumpus> after that, the label system can be improved, both in the GUI and RPC 12:08 < jonasschnelli> ack 12:08 < ryanofsky> #10244 would be my priority review, if it could be added 12:08 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10244 | [qt] Add abstraction layer for accessing node and wallet functionality from gui by ryanofsky · Pull Request #10244 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:08 < gmaxwell> okay. so long as its not an omission. I feel like we end up with our hands tied by the rpc interface pretty often. 12:08 < jtimon> sounds reasonable, certainly the priority is to remove the accounts system IMO 12:09 < jonasschnelli> setlabel and deletelabel should be multi-label compatible (API wise) 12:09 < gmaxwell> (by not an omission I mean that we don't put ourselves in a corner just because we didn't think of it. If you're aware, thats enough.) 12:09 < jonasschnelli> 7729 can be perfectly extaned later 12:09 < jonasschnelli> (without breaking the API) 12:10 < gmaxwell> OK. 12:10 < wumpus> I just think we shouldn't aim too far - we've been talking about deprecating the account system for so long and this is blocking it. But if there's suggesting for improving the API to (later) support multiple labels that's very welcome. 12:10 < jonasschnelli> Yes. We finally should do it. 12:10 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-52.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:10 < jtimon> other topics? 12:11 < wumpus> ryanofsky: sure; though we should first get the multiwallet base in, I think more abstraction around the wallet right now will break various PRs there again 12:11 < wumpus> #topic safe DoS handling around softforks (luke-jr) 12:11 < cfields> proposed quick topic: 0.14.2 12:12 < wumpus> ryanofsky: I'll add your PR to the high-priority PRs, but we need to keep that in mind 12:12 < sipa> i think DoS scoring in general needs a rework, but especially for blocks, i think that few is needed after PoW checking 12:12 < sdaftuar> #9530 12:12 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9530 | [brainstorm] DoS protection for blocks · Issue #9530 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:13 < jtimon> just add it as a depdendency in the OP and rebase on top of it maybe? 12:13 < luke-jr> it's come to light that blocks cause DoS penalties for invalid prev-blocks 12:13 < ryanofsky> wumpus, thanks. there is barely anything that would have to be change with current multiwallet prs, but i don't know what multiwallet plans for qt are 12:13 < luke-jr> which are liable to get triggered by outdated nodes following softforks 12:13 < wumpus> ryanofsky: I don't know either - just that multiwallet is priority for 0.15.0, better abstraction for the wallet can theoretically wait until 0.16 12:14 < luke-jr> part of this is easy to fix: just don't DoS-ban for invalid prevblocks 12:14 < wumpus> (would be great to get everything in, but in practice resources are limited and we have to choose) 12:14 < luke-jr> but there is also a ban for sending headers that "don't" connect (because we rejected an earlier invalid header) 12:14 < luke-jr> would there be any harm to checking the PoW on headers earlier, banning for failure there, and not banning for unconnecting ones? 12:15 < gmaxwell> luke-jr: if you do not disconnect peers on incompatible consensus rules you will likely become partitioned from nodes on consensus rules which are consistent with yourself. 12:15 < morcos> Doesn't it seem safer to keep the current banning behavior unitl we've also improved the ability to make sure we're not partitioned from nodes following our rules 12:16 < gmaxwell> One of the totally braindamaged element of BIP148 is that it does nothing to make the network of BIP148 users connected and it sounds like you'd like to make that even worse? 12:16 < wumpus> ryanofsky: but if it hardly collides in practice then it isn't a problem (sorry, will shut up about previous topic now) 12:16 < luke-jr> gmaxwell: softforks are backward compatible 12:17 < gmaxwell> luke-jr: when there is a persistant chain on invalid rules there is a hardfork. 12:17 < luke-jr> this is nothing specific to BIP148 12:17 < luke-jr> it is an issue for all softforks 12:17 < gmaxwell> BIP148 is a softfork but it creates a hardfork, its the hardfork that creates that partitioning issue. 12:17 < sipa> gmaxwell: i'm confused 12:17 < jtimon> can we stay on the issue as general to all softforks? 12:18 < instagibbs> I'm not sure how this topic arose? 12:18 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)] 12:18 < instagibbs> (I get the original topic) 12:18 < luke-jr> instagibbs: it was an observation on the current BIP148 PR that I'm investigating; but it applies to any softfork 12:18 < sipa> gmaxwell: i thought i understood your concern until you said it creates a hardfork 12:19 < BlueMatt> i assume here "hardfork" means "nodes will not converge" 12:19 < jtimon> I'm confused, are we talking about 2 different things? #9530 is from january 12:19 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9530 | [brainstorm] DoS protection for blocks · Issue #9530 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:19 < instagibbs> Yes they dont' appear to be connected? 12:19 < sdaftuar> perhaps this brainstorming should take place on #9530? the current DoS scoring is broken, and potentially problematic for softforks (though not for segwit) 12:19 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9530 | [brainstorm] DoS protection for blocks · Issue #9530 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:19 < sdaftuar> but there's no urgent issue here 12:19 < morcos> sdaftuar: +1 12:19 < sdaftuar> and lots of ways to solve, i suspect 12:19 < instagibbs> ACK 12:19 < sipa> BlueMatt: yes, nodes will risk not converging, but that's a P2P issue, not a consensus issue 12:20 < gmaxwell> ::sigh:: I give up. 12:20 < kanzure> sipa: from a payments angle, it's not just p2p. 12:20 < luke-jr> jtimon: 9530 is unrelated afaik 12:20 < gmaxwell> this terminology is too limited. 12:20 < gmaxwell> In any case, if your peers are accepting a chain you will not accept you need different peers. 12:20 < sipa> of course 12:20 < luke-jr> gmaxwell: unless those peers will accept the chain you have too. 12:21 < gmaxwell> luke-jr: not unless, you still need different peers. 12:21 < gmaxwell> (or at least _some_ different peers) 12:21 < luke-jr> or rather, they need you as a peer 12:21 < gmaxwell> they might, but you're useless to them if you're only connected to other nodes that are also on chains you won't accept. 12:22 -!- Sprh [~Sprh@12.20.48.10] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:22 < luke-jr> I wonder if we should have a different criteria for our outbound connections, than for inbound 12:22 < luke-jr> eg, tolerate more from inbound peers, but be super-strong that we are on the same block as our outbound peers 12:22 < gmaxwell> If you want to talk about making some fraction of your connection slots more agressive in enforcement than others that would be reasonable, but you can't have a case where you will never disconnect peers that accept different rules. 12:22 < morcos> yes we need a more comprehensive solution.. ideally you could figure out whether they'd accept your chain or not, and that could be a factor as well you knowing whether you'd accept theirs, but we shouldn't make ad hoc changes 12:23 < sipa> gmaxwell: am i summarizing correctly... even though DoS scoring for invalid blocks isn't needed as such, it's currently our only protection against accidentally ending up with only peers that will not accept the best chain you'd accept if you'd see it 12:23 < cfields> luke-jr: I have a patch-set worked up for making that possible. It doesn't change any current policy, just makes it more flexible to do that kind of thing 12:23 -!- BobBarker [~null@2607:5300:60:1c3f::] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:23 < gmaxwell> sipa: ya! 12:23 < sipa> ok, in that case i agree with you 12:23 -!- guest____ [5b8c103f@gateway/web/freenode/ip.91.140.16.63] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:23 < luke-jr> can we currently disconnect nodes, without banning them? 12:24 < luke-jr> I guess just set fDisconnect? 12:24 < morcos> which is what you guys said to each other on 9530 12:24 < gmaxwell> I think it would be sufficient to disconnect in those cases, yes. 12:24 < gmaxwell> (or very short ban) 12:24 < luke-jr> gmaxwell: I'm thinking of a conditional disconnect-only-if-outgoing-conn 12:25 < sdaftuar> in #9530, there's a suggestion of rotating outbound connections periodically 12:25 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9530 | [brainstorm] DoS protection for blocks · Issue #9530 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:25 < sdaftuar> and whether your outbound peer is on the same chain as you could be a criteria 12:27 < jtimon> action continue discussion on #9530 ? 12:27 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9530 | [brainstorm] DoS protection for blocks · Issue #9530 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:27 < luke-jr> 9530 sounds like too much refactoring IMO. I'm thinking for a bugfix only right now. 12:28 < luke-jr> but maybe there's enough overlap, dunno 12:29 < jtimon> anyway, next topic? 12:29 < luke-jr> in any case, is there a specific reason to disconnect for unconnectable headers, independently of the "same chain peers" issue? 12:29 < jtimon> or not 12:30 < luke-jr> we could move on if there's another topic, too; maybe someone can answer OOB if there's a need for the disconnect there 12:30 < wumpus> ok 12:30 < wumpus> #topic 0.14.2 (cfields) 12:30 -!- RubenSomsen [~RubenSoms@1.217.138.142] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 12:31 < wumpus> I think we've merged/backported everything that was tagged? 12:31 < cfields> just wanted to keep that rolling. several backports went in this week, anything else need to go? 12:31 < wumpus> if so, we can tag it after the meeting 12:31 < jonasschnelli> not yet 12:31 < wumpus> what's missing? 12:31 < jonasschnelli> Wait.. has been merged. Nm 12:32 < cfields> wumpus: +1 then 12:32 < jonasschnelli> I check the backports and seems that now everything went in 12:32 < jonasschnelli> checked 12:32 < wumpus> right, great 12:32 < jtimon> so rc? 12:32 < wumpus> that was indeed a short topic 12:33 < wumpus> yes 12:33 -!- benma [~benma@213.152.162.15] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:34 < wumpus> other topics? 12:34 < sipa> i wanted to bring up whether my writeup for style guidelines was acceptable, but i see it was already merged :) 12:34 < jonasschnelli> heh. Yes. 12:34 < jtimon> what was the pr? 12:34 < luke-jr> no, it's terrible. I'm not following it. /s 12:35 < wumpus> heh yes, it was exactly what was discussed in the previous meeting 12:35 < wumpus> #topic variable name guidelines 12:35 < luke-jr> wumpus: it was sarcasm :p 12:35 < sipa> OK. 12:35 < sipa> end topic 12:35 < wumpus> wanted to merge it as soon as possible to be able to point people at it in reviews 12:35 < sipa> yes, thank you for that 12:36 < jtimon> ok, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10461 reading now, but I assume it will be acceptable to me 12:36 < wumpus> more topics? this is becoming a high frequeny meeting 12:37 < sipa> we have 1.5 months left until feature freeze for 0.15 12:37 < sipa> anything to talk about there? 12:37 < sipa> i guess not... things happen as they happen 12:38 < wumpus> I... don't think so... would really love multiwallet to get in this time 12:38 < sdaftuar> perhaps suggestions for high priority features for 0.15? 12:38 < sdaftuar> as potentially distinct from high priority prs 12:39 < wumpus> if no PRs exist for them it might be too late already, but sure 12:39 < wumpus> #topic high priority features 12:39 < jtimon> I would love https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8994 , working on the blocksigning stuff again 12:40 < sdaftuar> i'd suggest matt's #10192 (script cache). huge validation win. 12:40 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10192 | Cache full script execution results in addition to signatures by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #10192 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:40 < sipa> ya 12:40 < cfields> +1 12:40 < jtimon> I have 2 PRs prefixed "Optimization", but didn't benchmark any of them... 12:41 < luke-jr> 10192 sounds problematic for future softforks 12:41 < wumpus> sdaftuar: any reason for not just adding that one to the high priority PRs though? 12:41 < jonasschnelli> +1 on 10192,.. seems also madable for 0.15 12:41 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #10506: Fix bumpfee test after #10449 (master...pr/bumpdis) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10506 12:41 < sdaftuar> wumpus: i was going to suggest it but thought matt might yell at me if it displaced his existing one :) 12:41 < sipa> luke-jr: i believe it shouldn't be, unless i've misunderstood the design 12:41 < wumpus> ohh okay, yes it's not really a blocker for his further work I guess, but before the feature freeze we can make an exception 12:41 < BlueMatt> yes, i still want #10179 to get in :( 12:41 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10179 | Give CValidationInterface Support for calling notifications on the CScheduler Thread by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #10179 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:42 < sipa> BlueMatt: will review 12:42 < BlueMatt> so much stuff to build on top of things 12:42 < sdaftuar> sipa: it interferes with script features that require chain-context. i think luke has proposed such a thing. 12:42 < luke-jr> sipa: specifically softforks where transactions are valid in some blocks, but not in others 12:42 < jtimon> merging something like #10427 before #10192 (I don't care his commit or mine, but would really love the nits solved) would make it simpler to review 12:42 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10427 | Consensus: Introduce static GetScriptFlags (mostly MOVEONLY) by jtimon · Pull Request #10427 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:42 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10192 | Cache full script execution results in addition to signatures by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #10192 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:42 < jonasschnelli> I think we should add 10192 to the prio list (and credit sdaftuar for it) 12:43 < wumpus> jonasschnelli: I've added it 12:43 < cfields> I have a good bit of net changes still coming, working on making them reviewable and adding tests. Definitely coming in time for 0.15. 12:43 < jonasschnelli> cfields: great! 12:44 < cfields> sipa: are you aiming to have openssl nuked in time for 0.15 ? 12:44 -!- benma [~benma@213.152.162.15] has quit [Changing host] 12:44 -!- benma [~benma@unaffiliated/benma] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:44 < sipa> luke-jr: fair enough, i agree - but i do think it's solvable (store the context-dependent script validation flags along with the entry in the cache) 12:44 < wumpus> is 'nuking openssl' really a goal? 12:45 < luke-jr> sipa: yes, but is it worth it? 12:45 < jonasschnelli> For the PRNG, I though so 12:45 < wumpus> ok 12:45 < luke-jr> hmm, 1.7x 12:46 < sipa> i'd like to be independent from OpenSSL, but that's more from a code management perspective than an actual fear for security 12:46 < cfields> wumpus: I was referring to #10299 12:46 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10299 | Remove OpenSSL by sipa · Pull Request #10299 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 12:46 < sipa> as such, i don't think removing openssl should be a priority, but i think it should eventually happen 12:46 -!- SopaXorzTaker [~SopaXorzT@unaffiliated/sopaxorztaker] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 12:46 < wumpus> I'd agree about boost but I'm... not sure trying to nuke all dependencies is a wise path 12:47 < luke-jr> dependencies are better than reinventing stuff 12:47 < luke-jr> (all else being equal) 12:47 < wumpus> that's an argument that should be considered, we can't do everything better, but yes everything else being equal 12:47 < cfields> sure, I wasn't arguing for/against, was just curious if 10299 was still desired 12:47 < jtimon> sorry for linking so many of my prs, but re boost: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10502 12:48 < luke-jr> our binaries are getting annoyingly large btw.. 12:48 < jonasschnelli> sipa: IMO the rng mostly matters for the wallet keys, and long term, I'm not sure if wallet keys created on the environments we run (Linux/OSX/Windows) are in general a "good thing". Using our own PRNG (via Fortuna, etc,) seems fine to me 12:48 < jonasschnelli> luke-jr: define "large" 12:48 < wumpus> improving the PRNG is certainly a good goal 12:49 < luke-jr> jonasschnelli: 215 MB excluding the debuginfo files 12:49 < sipa> wumpus: i'd say removing OpenSSL will come naturally once our PRNG has undergone a few more improvement 12:49 < wumpus> luke-jr: you certainly shouldn't cound debug info, no one ships that 12:49 < luke-jr> wumpus: that's why I didn't. 12:50 < cfields> luke-jr: wha?? stripped bitcoind is < 10mb on all platforms iirc 12:50 < wumpus> luke-jr: where do you think it comes from? is it just bitcoin-qt being large or everything? 12:50 < cfields> luke-jr: or did you mean all binaries combined? 12:50 < wumpus> sipa: ok, makes sense 12:50 < jonasschnelli> BitcoinD linux 64 is 9.3MB, Qt: ~33, 12:50 < jonasschnelli> Perfectly fine 12:51 < luke-jr> cfields: yes 12:51 < jtimon> and if somebody can help with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10193/commits/3f404ca62c26dae8f5a4f321820a460bf7b5373e I am kind of stuck there 12:51 < wumpus> qt is huge, but that's unavoidable,it's a lot of code... 12:51 < luke-jr> wumpus: it might be 12:51 < cfields> future builds should be much slimmer 12:51 < jonasschnelli> Qt5.9 can shrink ~20% from what I have read 12:51 < cfields> yes 12:51 < wumpus> I recently had to compile qt on a single-core ARM system (don't ask), took about 2 week 12:51 < cfields> and I'd be curious to see what lto does to bitcoin-qt ? 12:51 < jonasschnelli> hehe 12:51 < luke-jr> 2.7M bitcoin-cli; 33M bitcoin-qt; 3.0M bitcoin-tx; 8.9M bitcoind; 12M test_bitcoin 12:52 < jonasschnelli> compared to the 100GB blockchain... what should I say 12:52 < wumpus> luke-jr: it compresses very well though 12:52 < jtimon> is it a worry that test_bitcoin is big? 12:52 < jonasschnelli> no 12:52 < wumpus> nope 12:53 < wumpus> I think those numbers are pretty ok, compared to most desktop software 12:53 < jonasschnelli> indeed 12:53 < wumpus> (or even mobile software, nowadays) 12:53 < luke-jr> it adds up though 12:53 < luke-jr> but not too crazy I guess 12:53 < jtimon> I mean, if it can get smaller I don't think anybody will oppose 12:53 < luke-jr> I'd be curious what using shared libs would do for it. 12:53 < wumpus> yeah... hardly a priority though, it's only such a small part of the memory use 12:53 < luke-jr> at least for Windows, where it's trivial 12:54 -!- Aaronvan_ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 12:54 < cfields> luke-jr: there'd be a ton of circular deps to unravel 12:54 < luke-jr> cfields: ? 12:54 < wumpus> cfields: I think he just means for the deps 12:54 < luke-jr> ah 12:54 < cfields> ah 12:54 < wumpus> yes on windows it's trivial 12:55 < luke-jr> re internals as shared libs: on Linux, circular deps are not a problem, but IIRC they are for Windows 12:55 < cfields> osx as well, fwiw 12:55 < wumpus> on linux you can't simply ship .so's in the same directory and have it work 12:55 < cfields> wumpus: you can but you have to use rpath hacks :\ 12:55 < luke-jr> right, we'd need wrapper scripts (maybe okay, iff it makes a big difference) 12:55 < luke-jr> oh 12:55 < luke-jr> forgot about rpath :D 12:55 < cfields> there's a special rpath symbol that means pwd 12:56 < cfields> s/symbol/value/ 12:56 < luke-jr> yes, I use it in BFGMiner 12:56 < wumpus> cfields: doesn't that use the *current* directory instead of the application directory though? 12:56 < luke-jr> $ORIGIN 12:56 < luke-jr> the name suggests app dir 12:56 < jtimon> other super fast topic? 12:56 < wumpus> ok 12:56 < wumpus> anyhow it's worth experimenting with, possibly, for a future version 12:57 < jonasschnelli> Bitcoin Core ICO? 12:57 < jonasschnelli> *duck* 12:57 < wumpus> security might be slightly improved as well as different libs can be ASLRed relative to each other 12:57 < BlueMatt> jonasschnelli: ack 12:57 < wumpus> jonasschnelli: lol 12:57 < jtimon> testnet 4 ico at most 12:57 < luke-jr> jonasschnelli: IHO instead? 12:58 < luke-jr> compromise. 12:58 * sipa commits the Bitcoin Core.ico file 12:58 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:58 < luke-jr> (Initial Hat Offering) 12:58 < jonasschnelli> sipa: hahahaha 12:58 < jtimon> ITO 12:58 < jonasschnelli> Win32 had plenty if .ICO's 12:58 < BlueMatt> Bitcoin Series A ICO 12:58 < gmaxwell> We could sell international reply coupons... it would have a lot more substance than most ICOs. :) 12:58 -!- dclxvi [~DCLXVI@95-44-201-135-dynamic.agg1.whi.bdt-fng.eircom.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 12:59 < luke-jr> reply coupons? O.o\ 12:59 < cfields> sipa: https://bitcoincore.org/assets/images/favicon.ico 12:59 < wumpus> #endmeeting 12:59 < lightningbot> Meeting ended Thu Jun 1 19:59:47 2017 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) 12:59 < lightningbot> Minutes: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-06-01-19.00.html 12:59 < lightningbot> Minutes (text): http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-06-01-19.00.txt 12:59 < lightningbot> Log: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-06-01-19.00.log.html 13:00 < jtimon> can someone restart https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/237624588 ? 13:01 < wumpus> sure 13:04 -!- benma [~benma@unaffiliated/benma] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 13:04 < wumpus> * [new tag] v0.14.2rc1 -> v0.14.2rc1 13:04 < jtimon> thanks! 13:10 -!- Sprh [~Sprh@12.20.48.10] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:13 -!- ndrchvzz [5aae022d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.90.174.2.45] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 13:15 < cfields> woohoo 13:23 -!- Gnof [~Gnof@CPE00fc8d7da303-CM00fc8d7da300.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 13:46 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@173-31-39-168.client.mchsi.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 13:51 -!- Yogaqueef [~textual@dsl-hkibrasgw3-58c3d4-235.dhcp.inet.fi] has quit [Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…] 13:54 < sipa> travis is so slow these days 13:54 < sipa> is it because we have many pull requests and rebases? 13:54 < sipa> it seems to be lagging behind easily 14:17 -!- Char0n [~Char0n@unaffiliated/char0n] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 14:17 -!- Char0n [~Char0n@82.211.44.195] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 14:17 -!- Char0n [~Char0n@82.211.44.195] has quit [Changing host] 14:17 -!- Char0n [~Char0n@unaffiliated/char0n] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 14:37 -!- jannes [~jannes@095-097-246-234.static.chello.nl] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 14:37 -!- Gnof [~Gnof@CPE00fc8d7da303-CM00fc8d7da300.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has quit [Quit: ---] 14:58 -!- Guest60910 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 14:58 -!- Aaronvan_ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 14:59 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 14:59 -!- Guest44371 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 15:04 -!- nemgun [~nemgun@105.101.156.143] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 15:17 -!- vicenteH [~user@135.234.15.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 15:30 < jtimon> yeah travis seems to fail and lag more than usual these days 15:37 < jtimon> btw, travis didn't even run for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9176 15:38 -!- Guest60910 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 15:44 -!- Dizzle [~dizzle@108.171.182.16] has quit [Quit: Leaving...] 15:55 < sipa> what's the matter with test_bitcoin_qt failing on master? 15:58 < sipa> 16:56:50 < jtimon> mhmm FAIL: qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt on master 64beb13... Merge #10449: Overhaul Qt fee bumper 15:58 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10449 | Overhaul Qt fee bumper by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #10449 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 16:01 < jtimon> sipa: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10506 16:01 < sipa> jtimon: thanks! 16:04 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@173-31-39-168.client.mchsi.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:09 -!- nemgun [~nemgun@105.101.156.143] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:11 -!- str4d [~str4d@27.110.123.92] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:15 -!- gielbier [~michiel@unaffiliated/gielbier] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 16:16 -!- gielbier [~michiel@ip-213-127-0-162.ip.prioritytelecom.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:20 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 30 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/39039b12a744...1088b02f0ccd 16:20 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e66dbde Pieter Wuille: Add SizeEstimate to CDBBatch... 16:20 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f54580e Pieter Wuille: error() in disconnect for disk corruption, not inconsistency... 16:20 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e484652 Pieter Wuille: Introduce CHashVerifier to hash read data... 16:21 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #10195: Switch chainstate db and cache to per-txout model (master...pertxoutcache) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10195 16:26 < gmaxwell> Hey everybody!!! ^^^^^ 16:26 < gmaxwell> This means that after you pull your database will upgrade. 16:26 < gmaxwell> And will no longer be compatible with earlier versions! 16:26 * TD-Linux upgrades for speeeed 16:27 < gmaxwell> HOLY COW I'M GOING SO FAST https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb97AbB8M_o 16:27 < gmaxwell> If you do make the grave error of downgrading, you'll need to reindex. See you next month in that case. 16:28 < TD-Linux> bonus: pruned mode :^) 16:28 -!- emzy [~quassel@unaffiliated/emzy] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 16:29 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1088b02f0ccd...7cc2c670e3d7 16:29 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8906a9a Russell Yanofsky: Fix bumpfee test after #10449... 16:29 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7cc2c67 Pieter Wuille: Merge #10506: Fix bumpfee test after #10449... 16:29 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #10506: Fix bumpfee test after #10449 (master...pr/bumpdis) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10506 16:33 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #10396: Report LevelDB estimate for chainstate size in gettxoutsetinfo (master...diskdbsize) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10396 16:36 -!- emzy [~quassel@raspberry.emzy.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:38 < jtimon> if I get some more concept acks on #10339 maybe I should just close the noisy #9717 as included in it 16:38 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10339 | Optimization: Calculate block hash less times by jtimon · Pull Request #10339 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 16:38 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9717 | Pow: Remove fCheckPOW from CheckBlockHeader by jtimon · Pull Request #9717 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub --- Log closed Thu Jun 01 16:48:50 2017 --- Log opened Thu Jun 01 16:59:13 2017 16:59 -!- kanzure [~kanzure@unaffiliated/kanzure] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 16:59 -!- Irssi: #bitcoin-core-dev: Total of 194 nicks [0 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 194 normal] 17:04 -!- emzy [~quassel@raspberry.emzy.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:05 < jtimon> gmaxwell: I'm not sure what the implications of your comments about #10195 are, sadly I didn't find time to take more than a glance at it 17:05 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10195 | Switch chainstate db and cache to per-txout model by sipa · Pull Request #10195 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 17:07 < gmaxwell> jtimon: huh? 17:07 < sipa> jtimon: since 10195, at first startup, your chainstate database will be upgraded to a new format 17:08 < sipa> this may take a while, but only happens once 17:09 < jtimon> sipa: thank you, and gmaxwell is pointing out that trying to downgrade the chainstate database format would be painful, but there's no good reason to want that besides testing, right? 17:09 -!- Irssi: Join to #bitcoin-core-dev was synced in 644 secs 17:09 < sipa> indeed 17:10 < jtimon> but gmaxwell tried anyway, nice 17:11 < jtimon> and it works 17:12 < jtimon> I guess I shouldn't have started with the youtube video 17:22 < jtimon> I know it's selfish, but my plan was to partially review 10195 after squashed and merged all along 17:26 < sipa> that's a perfectly gine strategy 17:26 < sipa> *fine 17:31 -!- DCLXVI` [~DCLXVI@95-44-201-135-dynamic.agg1.whi.bdt-fng.eircom.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:33 -!- emzy_ [~quassel@raspberry.emzy.de] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:33 -!- emzy [~quassel@raspberry.emzy.de] has quit [Write error: Broken pipe] 17:33 -!- cfields [~quassel@unaffiliated/cfields] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.] 17:34 -!- cfields [~quassel@unaffiliated/cfields] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:38 -!- dclxvi [~DCLXVI@95-44-201-135-dynamic.agg1.whi.bdt-fng.eircom.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 17:43 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 17:43 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:45 -!- Aaronvan_ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 17:49 < jtimon> mhmm sipa I cannot find where this check went: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8498/commits/e1cddd6c57e0b40d63c6ed5ff8d61e2c6b44ad3e#r110544416 17:50 < sipa> doesn't exist anymore... we can't distinguish already spent from nonexisting 17:51 < sipa> it was unreliable before 17:53 -!- Dyaheon [~Dya@a91-156-192-39.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 17:53 < jtimon> thank you, I take that as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8498/commits/e1cddd6c57e0b40d63c6ed5ff8d61e2c6b44ad3e#diff-ca81084f62961a188f5c1e86a5ff1d7cL206 still being good (chnaging from 0 to 100 ) 17:53 < jtimon> rebasing just that now 17:54 < jtimon> anyway, nver mind, new checks right above 17:55 < jtimon> or are they new? I will figure it out, thanks 17:55 < cfields> wumpus: forgot to bump version before tag :( 17:56 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kfdmqypobbjivmqp] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 17:57 -!- Dyaheon [~Dya@a91-156-192-39.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:05 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@p98110-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:07 < jtimon> sipa: ping https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8498#issuecomment-305661391 18:08 -!- gielbier [~michiel@ip-213-127-0-162.ip.prioritytelecom.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 18:08 -!- gielbier [~michiel@ip-213-127-96-211.ip.prioritytelecom.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:13 -!- justan0theruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 18:14 -!- justanotheruser [~justanoth@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:33 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@173-31-39-168.client.mchsi.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 18:38 -!- harrymm [~wayne@104.237.91.152] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 18:40 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@173-31-39-168.client.mchsi.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 18:58 -!- harrymm [~wayne@104.237.91.58] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 19:13 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-52.dc.dc.cox.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 19:16 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-52.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 19:44 -!- RubenSomsen [~RubenSoms@1.217.138.142] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 20:04 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@173-31-39-168.client.mchsi.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:10 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@158.red-83-53-16.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:13 -!- RubenSomsen [~RubenSoms@1.217.138.142] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:25 -!- RubenSomsen [~RubenSoms@1.217.138.142] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 20:47 -!- RubenSomsen [~RubenSoms@1.217.138.142] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:48 -!- guest____ [5b8c103f@gateway/web/freenode/ip.91.140.16.63] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 20:58 < instagibbs> bad timing... https://github.com/drivechain-project/bitcoin/pull/10 just told them about new style guide, haha 20:59 < instagibbs> guess it's good it's merged now 21:25 -!- kadoban [~mud@unaffiliated/kadoban] has quit [Quit: bye] 22:12 -!- harrymm [~wayne@104.237.91.58] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 22:36 < wumpus> cfields: darn 22:40 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.14: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/4a41de4585a4dffb451a9be8078abb838235f336 22:40 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.14 4a41de4 Wladimir J. van der Laan: build: bump version to 0.14.2 22:40 < wumpus> well that means there will be a rc2 for sure 22:43 < gmaxwell> oh damnit we did it again. 22:43 < gmaxwell> I somehow missed that we were cutting a rc1. 22:44 < wumpus> another reason it's good that we do rcs in the first place 22:44 < wumpus> that was discussed in the meeting yesterday 22:44 < gmaxwell> yea, I missed part of it. 22:45 < gmaxwell> oh hm. testing is slightly harder because I've upgraded most of my nodes to per txo! :P 22:45 < wumpus> yes, not your fault 22:45 < wumpus> ... same here 22:49 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ckwnnylkknbfwuxe] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:00 -!- dermoth [~thomas@dsl-66-36-135-165.mtl.aei.ca] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 23:00 -!- dermoth [~thomas@dsl-66-36-135-165.mtl.aei.ca] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:05 -!- jtimon [~quassel@117.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 23:38 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 23:44 -!- Guest60910 [~john@host86-147-127-48.range86-147.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:47 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-240-13-215-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 23:48 -!- Victor_sueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:49 -!- Victorsueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 23:50 -!- Victorsueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:52 -!- Victor_sueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 23:55 -!- nemgun1 [~nemgun@105.101.30.158] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev 23:58 -!- nemgun [~nemgun@105.101.156.143] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]