--- Log opened Thu Aug 08 00:00:16 2024
00:08 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
00:18 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
00:24 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
00:51 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
00:57 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
01:10 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:15 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
01:18 -!- BrandonOdiwuor [~BrandonOd@105.163.156.120] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
01:23 -!- gribble [~gribble@bitcoin/bot/gribble] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
01:25 -!- gribble [~gribble@bitcoin/bot/gribble] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:25 -!- mode/#bitcoin-core-dev [+o gribble] by ChanServ
01:27 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:33 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
01:33 -!- Earnestly [~earnest@user/earnestly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:35 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
01:45 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
01:54 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
02:07 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:5ddc:5c9d:864f:d5af] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:21 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #29790: [DO NOT MERGE] cmake: Migrate CI scripts to CMake-based build system -- WIP (master...240402-cmake-DA) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29790
02:21 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:5ddc:5c9d:864f:d5af] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
02:28 -!- Guest20 [~Guest20@182.23.5.155] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:29 -!- Guest20 [~Guest20@182.23.5.155] has quit [Client Quit]
02:30 -!- mudsip [~mudsip@user/mudsip] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:34 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:40 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
02:52 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
02:57 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
03:09 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:15 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
03:15 -!- mudsip [~mudsip@user/mudsip] has quit []
03:28 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:34 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
03:46 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
03:51 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:9d8b:8304:4cb8:9a76] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
04:02 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:5ddc:5c9d:864f:d5af] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
04:08 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:5ddc:5c9d:864f:d5af] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
04:20 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:550d:5de1:a8af:7534] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
04:26 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:550d:5de1:a8af:7534] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
04:37 -!- noonien808310429 [~noonien@86.125.147.232] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
04:39 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
04:44 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
05:16 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:550d:5de1:a8af:7534] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
05:21 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #30609: guix: bump time-machine to 7bf1d7aeaffba15c4f680f93ae88fbef25427252 (master...guix_nuke_openssl_1_x_python_2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30609
05:36 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fjahr closed pull request #30516: Assumeutxo: Sanitize block height in metadata (master...2024-07-au-blockheight-san) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30516
06:03 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has quit [Quit: = ""]
06:05 -!- Guest16 [~Guest16@105.112.125.129] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:08 -!- Guest16 [~Guest16@105.112.125.129] has quit [Client Quit]
06:22 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:550d:5de1:a8af:7534] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
06:26 -!- nanotube [~nanotube@user/nanotube] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
06:31 -!- andrewtoth [~andrewtot@gateway/tor-sasl/andrewtoth] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:38 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:550d:5de1:a8af:7534] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:39 -!- nanotube [~nanotube@user/nanotube] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:43 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:550d:5de1:a8af:7534] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
06:52 < achow101> #proposedmeetingtopic Future of priority projects
06:56 -!- kashifs [~kashifs@syn-069-206-167-209.res.spectrum.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:56 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
06:58 -!- Emc99 [~Emc99@212.129.77.182] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:00 < achow101> #startmeeting
07:00 < achow101> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: achow101 _aj_ amiti ariard aureleoules b10c BlueMatt brunoerg cfields darosior dergoegge dongcarl fanquake fjahr furszy gleb glozow hebasto instagibbs jamesob jarolrod jonatack josibake kallewoof kanzure kouloumos kvaciral laanwj LarryRuane lightlike luke-jr MacroFake Murch phantomcircuit pinheadmz promag provoostenator ryanofsky sdaftuar S3RK stickies-v sipa sr_gi theStack TheCharlatan vasild
07:00 < sdaftuar> hi
07:00 < tdb3> hi
07:00 < b10c> hi
07:00 < glozow> hi
07:00 < brunoerg> hi
07:00 < Murch[m]> hi
07:00 < fjahr> hi
07:00 < sr_gi[m]1> hi
07:00 < lightlike> hi
07:00 < furszy> hi
07:00 < stickies-v> hi
07:01 < hebasto> hi
07:01 < achow101> There is one preproposed meeting topic, any last minute ones to add?
07:01 < willcl-ark> hi
07:01 < jonatack> hi
07:01 -!- dzxzg [~bezel@99-8-160-223.lightspeed.anhmca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:01 < fjahr> I will yapp on about assumeutxo one more time :)
07:01 < achow101> #topic package relay updates (glozow)
07:02 < glozow> #30110 still priority. It hasn't actually gotten any review comments yet, so I'm not thinking it'll be in 28.0
07:02 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30110 | refactor: TxDownloadManager + fuzzing by glozow · Pull Request #30110 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:02 < glozow> That's all for me
07:02 < achow101> #topic cluster mempool updates (sdaftuar)
07:03 < sdaftuar> cluster mempool is progressing! #30285 was merged a few days ago. #30286 is up next and has gotten some review already
07:03 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30285 | cluster mempool: merging & postprocessing of linearizations by sipa · Pull Request #30285 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:03 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30286 | cluster mempool: optimized candidate search by sipa · Pull Request #30286 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:04 < sdaftuar> happy to take questions but that is it from me
07:04 < achow101> #topic legacy wallet removal updates (achow101)
07:05 < achow101> Since 28.0 is coming up, I'd like to get https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/824 and #30265 in.
07:05 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30265 | wallet: Fix listwalletdir listing of migrated default wallets and generated backup files by achow101 · Pull Request #30265 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:05 < achow101> these are more like bug fixes though so I think don't have to make the feature freeze deadline
07:06 < achow101> Otherwise, haven't gotten any review on the other PRs
07:06 < achow101> #topic Ad-hoc high priority for review
07:06 < theStack> hi
07:06 < achow101> Anything to add or remove from https://github.com/orgs/bitcoin/projects/1/views/4
07:07 < sipa> hi
07:08 < achow101> #topic 28.0 release priorities
07:08 < achow101> Feature freeze is scheduled for this Monday
07:08 < achow101> anything we should add or remove to the milestone?
07:08 < fjahr> I know I’ve been harping on about this for a while but since we are so close, it would be great if we could tag the remaining important Assumeutxo PRs for v28. #29519 already has two ACKs. #28553 would be necessary too and we had intense discussions over the last two days so I hope we can lay this to rest quickly now. Technicallyyyy both of these are fixing bugs in the existing assumeutxo feature (signet/testnet3) so I 
07:08 < fjahr> don’t think they would necessarily even need to make it in before feature freeze. And then of course #30598 which technicallyyyy is updating chain params which is also something we usually do after feature freeze :p
07:08 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29519 | p2p: For assumeutxo, download snapshot chain before background chain by mzumsande · Pull Request #29519 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:08 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28553 | validation: assumeutxo params mainnet by Sjors · Pull Request #28553 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:08 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30598 | assumeutxo: Drop block height from metadata by fjahr · Pull Request #30598 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:08 < fjahr> Most importantly I think a lot of people have been involved in, improved and better understood assumeutxo over the last 6 months (again see #29616) and the vibe I have been getting from others is that there is agreement that the feature is ready for mainnet use, especially since setting an initial height at 840k is really low risk.
07:08 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29616 | AssumeUTXO Mainnet Readiness Tracking · Issue #29616 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:09 < achow101> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/milestone/66
07:09 < fjahr> Ah, I see the issue for #30598 was already added
07:09 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30598 | assumeutxo: Drop block height from metadata by fjahr · Pull Request #30598 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:10 < achow101> fjahr: added all 3
07:10 < fjahr> achow101: thank you!
07:10 < hebasto> the 28.0 milestone in the GUI repo -- https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/milestone/13
07:11 < achow101> fjahr: was that your assumeutxo topic?
07:11 < sipa> i'd really like to see #30043 in sooner than later, but it can use more review (unsure if before feature freeze is reasonable)
07:11 <@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30043 | net: Replace libnatpmp with built-in PCP+NATPMP implementation by laanwj · Pull Request #30043 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
07:12 < achow101> sipa: I think it might not make it for feature freeze
07:12 < achow101> maybe for 29.0?
07:12 < fjahr> achow101: yepp, nothing else to add
07:12 < sipa> achow101: agreed
07:13 < achow101> #topic Future of priority projects (achow101)
07:14 < achow101> At the last CoreDev, we had a discussion about priority projects. I recall that the general sentiment was that it was getting less effective since we moved to doing online polling and such.
07:15 < achow101> IIRC we concluded that for the next set of priority projects, we would determine them in person at the October CoreDev
07:15 < sipa> that would be my preference
07:15 < fjahr> I think this is something that is best discussed in an in-person meeting but as an idea: it might be an interesting experiment to see what happens to priority projects if there isn’t one champion but 2-3 instead. If there are not 2-3 people interested in or capable of championing for a project, then maybe it’s not a good fit (yet).
07:16 < achow101> So I think once we past feature freeze on Monday, the current priority projects will be cleared, and we'll not have any until next CoreDev
07:16 < sipa> fjahr: my view is that *any* vote for a priority project should mean "i commit to actively contributing/reviewing PRs related to this feature if it ends up winning"
07:16 < glozow> achow101: that makes sense to me
07:16 < fjahr> sipa: that would be ideal but doesn't seem to be the reality :/
07:17 < sipa> fjahr: that seems to be a communication issue to me
07:17 < fjahr> maybe there should be the option or urge for people to not put in all of their votes if they don't want to do that
07:17 -!- bezel_ [~bezel@2600:1700:8d41:8880::49] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:17 -!- bezel_ [~bezel@2600:1700:8d41:8880::49] has quit [Client Quit]
07:17 < fjahr> but best discussed in person probably..
07:17 < sipa> fjahr: yeah
07:17 < jonatack> would contributors not attending coredev be asked for input?
07:19 < sipa> i think it makes sense to start proposals/nominations before coredev, and then continue permitting voting by org members after... but the benefit of actually having the fast interactive discussion in person seems evident to me
07:19 < fjahr> I guess these are different side of a spectrum on forming teams around a priority project, which I think would be a good direction for experimenting
07:19 < fjahr> *sides
07:20 < lightlike> i don't think that the voting modus has much to do with the effectiveness. I think if there aren't enough people who would be willing change what they will work on based on the outcome of the vote, the vote doesn't  really make a difference.
07:20 -!- dzxzg [~bezel@99-8-160-223.lightspeed.anhmca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
07:21 < achow101> I think a big component of why it worked the first time was because we did it in person and the vote gave people the motivation to shill their projects and convince others to work on it while we were all in the same place
07:22 < jonatack> it could possibly furthermore be argued that both coredev and additional project management processes can be centralization pressures, to an extent. so while they can be more or less somewhat effective, my preference is more in the direction of ad hoc rather than process
07:22 < Murch[m]> I wouldn’t perceive it as a vote in that sense: it’s more of taking a census of what people intend to work on, and giving projects with a lot of contributors a focus in the meetings.
07:22 < fjahr> lightlike: I think sipa's point is less about the mode of voting but actually buy in from the voters
07:22 < achow101> jonatack: tbh this is pretty ad hoc. we're making up the process as we go :p
07:23 < jonatack> achow101: :)
07:23 < furszy> I think we should just take it as a public way of forming working groups with weekly updates on the most voted ones.
07:24 < achow101> anyways, the point is that we'll try something different for 29.0, and it will likely be centered around discussions that occur at CoreDev
07:24 < achow101> Any other topics?
07:24 -!- willcl-ark [~willcl-ar@user/willcl-ark] has quit [Quit: left]
07:26 < glozow> fwiw, I disagree that trying to communicate what our plans are to form working groups is centralization pressure. We can be decentralized without being disorganized.
07:26 < jonatack> achow101: sure. if/when in doubt, suggest less process over more. side benefit: more interesting, less mechanical meetings
07:27 < achow101> #endmeeting
07:27 -!- kashifs [~kashifs@syn-069-206-167-209.res.spectrum.com] has quit [Quit: Client closed]
07:27 -!- Emc99 [~Emc99@212.129.77.182] has quit [Quit: Client closed]
07:27 < achow101> jonatack: we did that for years before the first batch of priority projects and "more interesting, less mechanical meetings" is categorically untrue
07:28 < achow101> those meetings were boring as hell and very mechanical, with me being the only person talking because I was running them
07:28 -!- willcl-ark [~willcl-ar@cpc123780-trow7-2-0-cust177.18-1.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:28 -!- willcl-ark [~willcl-ar@user/willcl-ark] has changed host
07:28 < jonatack> achow101: i'm referring to meetings earlier than that. certainly, that's my opinion.
07:29 < achow101> and clearly something stopped working between then and for the few years prior to priority projects. I don't think going back to that is going to help anyone, nor is sticking with what we currently do
07:30 < achow101> changing things up might mean "process", but I think that trying to organize to get stuff done is better than the cycle of stalling that we were stuck in for years
07:32 < fjahr> It's tricky, I would say that assumeutxo was a success as in we got a lot done over the last 6 months without any organizational structure and without it even being a priority project. But I wouldn't say that this is repeatable because there were also years of lingering for that project before that. Ideally things don't take that long to begin with and for that I think amore structure is necessary.
07:33 < jonatack> sure, "change" is fine and the way of things.
07:33 < jonatack> (fine, as in, to be expected)
07:38 < ajonas> The purpose of priority projects is not to tell people what to do, but rather to help contributors collaborate in a more efficient way. The exercise of writing down goals and checking in on them has an effect.
07:40 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:42 -!- pigeons [~pigeons@d23-16-131-51.bchsia.telus.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
07:42 -!- pigeons [~pigeons@user/pigeons] has changed host
07:55 -!- bugs_ [~bugs@user/bugs/x-5128603] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:29 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net] has left #bitcoin-core-dev [Closing Window]
08:29 -!- puchka [~puchka@185.203.122.72] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:50 -!- abubakarsadiq [uid602234@id-602234.hampstead.irccloud.com] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
08:51 -!- preimage [~halosghos@user/halosghost] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:55 -!- TheCharlatan [~drgrid@2a01:4f9:4a:2adc::2] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
08:55 -!- TheCharlatan [~drgrid@2a01:4f9:4a:2adc::2] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
08:59 -!- uasf [~uasf@2604:a880:2:d0::1bda:1001] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
08:59 -!- Sjors[m]1 [~provooste@2620:6e:a000:ce11::1f] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
09:00 -!- mcey_ [~emcy@148.252.146.198] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:00 -!- Sjors[m]11 [~provooste@2620:6e:a000:ce11::1f] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:01 -!- uasf [~uasf@2604:a880:2:d0::1bda:1001] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:02 -!- mcey [~emcy@148.252.145.21] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
09:04 -!- zeropoint [~alex@45-28-139-114.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:25 -!- Earnestly [~earnest@user/earnestly] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
09:25 -!- jamesob443688173 [~jamesob@108.44.248.162] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:25 -!- jamesob15 [~jamesob@108.44.248.162] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
09:43 -!- jonatack [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
10:03 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@98.226.206.182] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
10:25 -!- dermoth [~dermoth@user/dermoth] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
10:29 -!- dermoth [~dermoth@user/dermoth] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:33 < sipa> the line "m_ibd_chainstate->ForceFlushStateToDisk();" in ChainstateManager::MaybeCompleteSnapshotVal
10:33 < sipa> idation
10:35 < sipa> since the flush/sync separation, is it desirable/necessary that this call wipes the cache, or does just writing changes to disk suffice?
10:37 -!- andrewtoth [~andrewtot@gateway/tor-sasl/andrewtoth] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
10:39 -!- andrewtoth [~andrewtot@gateway/tor-sasl/andrewtoth] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:39 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2600:1700:b30:47c0:8482:fc74:baf7:d777] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:47 -!- oneeyedalien [~oneeyedal@user/oneeyedalien] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:49 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #30610: validation: do not wipe utxo cache for stats/scans/snapshots (master...202408_force_sync) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30610
10:57 -!- Earnestly [~earnest@user/earnestly] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10:58 -!- oneeyedalien [~oneeyedal@user/oneeyedalien] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
11:02 -!- jonatack [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:11 -!- pigeons [~pigeons@user/pigeons] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
11:17 -!- oneeyedalien [~oneeyedal@user/oneeyedalien] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11:21 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] andrewtoth opened pull request #30611: validation: write chainstate to disk every hour (master...write-chainstate-every-hour) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30611
11:21 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] andrewtoth closed pull request #15218: validation: sync chainstate to disk after syncing to tip (master...flush-after-ibd) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15218
12:42 -!- puchka [~puchka@185.203.122.72] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
12:46 -!- Talkless [~Talkless@mail.dargis.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
13:10 -!- zeropoint [~alex@45-28-139-114.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Quit: leaving]
13:11 -!- oneeyedalien [~oneeyedal@user/oneeyedalien] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
13:22 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] whitslack opened pull request #30612: Fixes for GCC 15 compatibility (master...gcc15-fixes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30612
13:34 -!- bugs_ [~bugs@user/bugs/x-5128603] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
13:38 -!- TallTim_ [~talltim@165-23-61-81-dynamic.midco.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13:42 -!- TallTim [~talltim@165-23-61-81-dynamic.midco.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
13:54 -!- zeropoint [~alex@45-28-139-114.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14:06 -!- abubakarsadiq [uid602234@id-602234.hampstead.irccloud.com] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14:19 < bitcoin-git> [gui-qml] johnny9 opened pull request #414: qml: uncomment DebugMessageHandler install (main...re-enable-debuglog) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/414
14:20 < bitcoin-git> [gui-qml] johnny9 closed pull request #414: qml: uncomment DebugMessageHandler install (main...re-enable-debuglog) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/414
14:23 < bitcoin-git> [gui-qml] johnny9 reopened pull request #414: qml: uncomment DebugMessageHandler install (main...re-enable-debuglog) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/414
15:02 -!- pigeons [~pigeons@user/pigeons] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15:03 -!- preimage [~halosghos@user/halosghost] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 4.3.5]
15:34 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2600:1700:b30:47c0:8482:fc74:baf7:d777] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
16:53 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
17:21 -!- zeropoint [~alex@45-28-139-114.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Quit: leaving]
18:42 -!- andrewtoth [~andrewtot@gateway/tor-sasl/andrewtoth] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
18:42 -!- andrewtoth [~andrewtot@gateway/tor-sasl/andrewtoth] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:11 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2600:1700:b30:47c0:8482:fc74:baf7:d777] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
19:14 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2600:1700:b30:47c0:8482:fc74:baf7:d777] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
20:04 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:2134:8d9a:4728:7301] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:05 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:2134:8d9a:4728:7301] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
20:20 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:2134:8d9a:4728:7301] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:25 -!- kevkevin [~kevkevin@2601:241:8703:7b30:2134:8d9a:4728:7301] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
20:26 -!- gribble [~gribble@bitcoin/bot/gribble] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
20:33 -!- gribble [~gribble@bitcoin/bot/gribble] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20:33 -!- mode/#bitcoin-core-dev [+o gribble] by ChanServ
21:01 -!- cmirror [~cmirror@4.53.92.114] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
21:01 -!- cmirror [~cmirror@4.53.92.114] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:07 -!- abubakarsadiq [uid602234@id-602234.hampstead.irccloud.com] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
21:14 -!- jonatack [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
21:17 -!- jonatack [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
21:24 -!- adiabat [~adiabat@63.209.32.102] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
21:26 -!- adiabat [~adiabat@63.209.32.102] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:01 -!- mcey [~emcy@148.252.146.198] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22:01 -!- mcey_ [~emcy@148.252.146.198] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
23:14 -!- lbia [~lbia@user/lbia] has quit [Quit: lbia]
23:56 -!- mailman [~mailman@2401:ba80:aa90:2d85:3:1:8530:c978] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
23:56 -!- mailman [~mailman@2401:ba80:aa90:2d85:3:1:8530:c978] has quit [K-Lined]
--- Log closed Fri Aug 09 00:00:17 2024