--- Log opened Sat Jun 25 00:00:39 2016
00:04 -!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@unaffiliated/debruyne] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
00:07 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
00:12 -!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
00:16 -!- Inaltoas1nistra [~jonathan@88-149-163-147.v4.ngi.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
00:17 -!- Inaltoasinistra [~jonathan@88-149-234-94.v4.ngi.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
00:21 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
00:28 -!- Noldorin [~noldorin@unaffiliated/noldorin] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
00:45 -!- spinza [~spin@197.93.182.128] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
00:47 -!- frankenm_ [~frankenmi@73.96.105.14] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
00:55 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.107.55] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
00:56 -!- nabu [~nabu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/nabu] has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
01:04 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:2dd8:4b7c:a918:868b] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:06 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.107.55] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
01:07 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.107.55] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:15 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:16 -!- dnaleor [~dnaleor@78-23-74-78.access.telenet.be] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
01:17 -!- MoALTz [~no@78-11-183-124.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:19 -!- dnaleor [~dnaleor@78-23-74-78.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:27 -!- cyphase [~cyphase@unaffiliated/cyphase] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
01:28 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.107.55] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
01:30 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.106.160] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:31 -!- frankenm_ [~frankenmi@73.96.106.160] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:31 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.106.160] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
01:33 -!- cyphase [~cyphase@unaffiliated/cyphase] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:33 -!- Iriez [wario@distribution.xbins.org] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
01:33 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.105.39] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:36 -!- frankenm_ [~frankenmi@73.96.106.160] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
01:37 -!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@unaffiliated/debruyne] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
01:37 -!- spinza [~spin@197.89.233.41] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:39 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.105.39] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
01:39 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.105.39] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:39 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.105.39] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
01:40 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.105.39] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:41 -!- xsdfdfsa [~x@unaffiliated/sdfgsdfg] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:43 -!- stqism is now known as coup_de_shitlord
01:43 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.105.39] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
01:43 -!- coup_de_shitlord is now known as coup
01:43 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.105.39] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:44 -!- coup is now known as stqism
01:44 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:46 -!- cyphase [~cyphase@unaffiliated/cyphase] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
01:50 -!- cyphase [~cyphase@unaffiliated/cyphase] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:52 -!- pro [~pro@unaffiliated/pro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:55 -!- cyphase [~cyphase@unaffiliated/cyphase] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
01:57 -!- stqism [~coup_de_s@freebsd/user/stqism] has quit [Quit: Like 3 fire emojis lit rn 🔥🔥🔥]
01:58 -!- coup_de_shitlord [~coup_de_s@freebsd/user/stqism] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
01:58 -!- coup_de_shitlord is now known as stqism
02:11 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:2dd8:4b7c:a918:868b] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
02:13 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:9572:9fca:d82c:773d] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
02:19 -!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
02:21 -!- MaxSan_ [~one@46.19.137.116] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
02:22 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]
02:22 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.105.39] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
02:26 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.107.65] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
02:30 -!- xsdfdfsa [~x@unaffiliated/sdfgsdfg] has quit [Quit: xsdfdfsa]
02:31 -!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@73.96.107.65] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
02:34 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38335.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
03:02 -!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
03:18 -!- MaxSan_ [~one@46.19.137.116] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
03:20 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
03:24 -!- MoALTz [~no@78-11-183-124.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
03:25 -!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@unaffiliated/debruyne] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
03:25 -!- MoALTz [~no@78-11-183-124.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
03:34 -!- MaxSan_ [~one@82.145.37.203] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
04:27 < kanzure> "How to backdoor Diffie-Hellman" http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/644.pdf
04:52 -!- AusteritySucks [~Austerity@unaffiliated/austeritysucks] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
05:02 -!- King_Rex [~King_Rex@unaffiliated/king-rex/x-3258444] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
05:09 -!- AusteritySucks [~Austerity@unaffiliated/austeritysucks] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
05:20 -!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
05:34 -!- ManfredMacx [~hyperion@93-142-84-146.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:00 -!- nonaTure [~nonaTure@053dbb41.dynamic.tele-ag.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:07 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:08 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:9572:9fca:d82c:773d] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
06:09 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:9572:9fca:d82c:773d] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:15 -!- MaxSan_ [~one@82.145.37.203] has left #bitcoin-wizards []
06:32 -!- Davasny [~quassel@78-11-193-195.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:32 -!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
06:36 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:45 -!- liead [~adlai@unaffiliated/adlai] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:45 -!- CodeShark_ [sid126576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dccyousuznwdbvay] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:47 -!- jbenet_ [sid17552@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hkhjbrrurtffnvhy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:47 -!- retrohacker_ [uid34590@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-yfnkrkfvxtxyznib] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:48 -!- a5m0 [~a5m0@unaffiliated/a5m0] has quit [Disconnected by services]
06:48 -!- Alanius_ [~alan@flyingarm.bar] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:48 -!- a5m0_ [~a5m0@unaffiliated/a5m0] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:48 -!- trippysa1mon [~trippy@cyberdynesys.org] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:48 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:9572:9fca:d82c:773d] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
06:50 -!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@unaffiliated/debruyne] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
06:50 -!- lysobit_ [~musalbas@2001:bc8:30c2:ff00::] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:50 -!- Noice_ [~Noice__@2001:1900:2104:2::86] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:51 -!- nsh [~lol@wikipedia/nsh] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- retrohacker [sid34590@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hfcsvzmvrlkdyict] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- artifexd [sid28611@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-uhrhhxbxfhwfbwnr] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- musalbas [~musalbas@2001:bc8:30c2:ff00::] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- freekevin [freekevin@gateway/shell/xshellz/x-tfkeqmsmlthpwxye] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38335.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- wpalczynski [sid55851@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fzglcheexrpmbvgo] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- mariorz [sid490@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qdqhekezhhaexulx] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- stqism [~coup_de_s@freebsd/user/stqism] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- Alanius [~alan@flyingarm.bar] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- epscy [~epscy@176.126.241.239] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- aspect_ [uid151486@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qotekbrmujuycrhi] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- CodeShark [sid126576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-evanvuyqmmatdbiw] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- Noice [~Noice__@2001:1900:2104:2::86] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- bitjedi [sid162488@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-visrieiafoakqhdz] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- trippysalmon [~trippy@cyberdynesys.org] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- bildramer [~bildramer@p2003004D2B377800AC9BCCA14258DFA9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- jonasschnelli [~jonasschn@unaffiliated/jonasschnelli] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- adlai [~adlai@unaffiliated/adlai] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- phantomcircuit [~phantomci@192.241.205.97] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- amiller [~socrates1@unaffiliated/socrates1024] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- Jaamg [jhpiloma@gateway/shell/tkk.fi/x-rfkyryvwxtqnmupi] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- ryan-c [~ryan@srv1.turboslow.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- jbenet [sid17552@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gplauptwgzehlqpo] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- BCBot [~BCBot@46.101.246.115] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
06:51 -!- aspect_ [uid151486@gateway/web/irccloud.com/session] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:51 -!- lysobit_ is now known as musalbas
06:51 -!- aspect_ [uid151486@gateway/web/irccloud.com/session] has quit [Changing host]
06:51 -!- aspect_ [uid151486@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ntapqxlraockvwxb] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:51 -!- coup_de_shitlord [~coup_de_s@freebsd/user/stqism] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:51 -!- amiller_ [~socrates1@li175-104.members.linode.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:52 -!- freekevin [freekevin@gateway/shell/xshellz/x-ellvdkqwgjeapczr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:52 -!- phantomcircuit [~phantomci@192.241.205.97] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:52 -!- mariorz [sid490@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ruoixdbveiknpnku] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:52 -!- retrohacker_ is now known as retrohacker
06:52 -!- bildramer [~bildramer@p2003004D2B377800AC9BCCA14258DFA9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:52 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38335.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:53 -!- jonasschnelli [~jonasschn@2a01:4f8:200:7025::2] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:53 -!- CodeShark_ is now known as CodeShark
06:54 -!- epscy [~epscy@176.126.241.239] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:54 -!- wpalczynski [sid55851@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-jxiuvmixzwuawibp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:56 -!- Jaamg [jhpiloma@gateway/shell/tkk.fi/x-zutnsnbnlsoygphl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:56 -!- ryan-c [~ryan@srv1.turboslow.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:57 -!- bitjedi [bitjedi@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-smboasgcpqaopffr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:57 -!- artifexd [sid28611@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hcwvtpombjgwwpws] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
06:58 -!- nsh [~lol@wikipedia/nsh] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:01 -!- jbenet_ is now known as jbenet
07:06 -!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:09 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:09 -!- ruby32 [~ruby32@ool-4a59b2e2.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
07:10 -!- ruby32 [~ruby32@ool-4a59b2e2.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:17 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
07:21 -!- b-itcoinssg [uid41629@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-cdxloukwjfrdlwcy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:22 -!- b-itcoinssg [uid41629@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-cdxloukwjfrdlwcy] has quit [Client Quit]
07:22 -!- b-itcoinssg [uid41629@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-milcexyncrqqovos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:28 -!- jtimon [~quassel@217.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:31 -!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
07:31 -!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
07:31 -!- arubi_ is now known as arubi
07:47 -!- Noldorin [~noldorin@unaffiliated/noldorin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
08:22 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-jooohmrqpvlwsjly] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
08:44 -!- nonaTure [~nonaTure@053dbb41.dynamic.tele-ag.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
08:46 -!- MaxSan_ [~one@82.145.37.203] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
08:47 -!- tucenaber_ [~tucenaber@o144.231.lokis.net.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
08:51 -!- jtimon [~quassel@217.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Quit: gone]
08:51 -!- jtimon [~quassel@217.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
09:03 -!- nonaTure [~nonaTure@053dbb41.dynamic.tele-ag.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
09:08 -!- Guest91676 is now known as [Derek]
09:08 -!- [Derek] [~derek@2605:6400:10:3c9:dfd3:3e96:2608:98a7] has quit [Changing host]
09:08 -!- [Derek] [~derek@unaffiliated/derek/x-8562683] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
09:11 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:497:816f:c47d:e481] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
09:24 < kanzure> https://github.com/mimoo/Diffie-Hellman_Backdoor
09:36 -!- ManfredMacx [~hyperion@93-142-84-146.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
09:41 -!- tucenaber [~tucenaber@unaffiliated/tucenaber] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
09:41 -!- b-itcoinssg [uid41629@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-milcexyncrqqovos] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
09:42 -!- Iriez [wario@distribution.xbins.org] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
09:58 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
10:00 -!- sparetire [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
10:03 -!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@unaffiliated/debruyne] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
10:08 -!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
10:09 -!- Emcy [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust336.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
10:09 -!- Emcy [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust336.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Changing host]
10:09 -!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
10:20 -!- Sosumi [~Leon@bl10-113-190.dsl.telepac.pt] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
10:48 -!- bsm117532 [~mcelrath@38.121.165.30] has quit [Killed (kornbluth.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services))]
10:48 -!- bsm1175321 is now known as bsm117532
10:49 -!- bsm1175321 [~mcelrath@38.121.165.30] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
11:05 -!- liead is now known as adlai
11:08 -!- Cory [~C@unaffiliated/cory] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
11:10 -!- ruby32 [~ruby32@ool-4a59b2e2.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
11:10 -!- Pasha [~C@unaffiliated/cory] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
11:10 -!- ruby32 [~ruby32@ool-4a59b2e2.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
11:17 -!- Pasha is now known as Cory
11:37 -!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
11:40 -!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
11:43 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:497:816f:c47d:e481] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
11:44 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:497:816f:c47d:e481] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
11:53 -!- murch [~murch@p4FE38335.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
11:56 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
11:59 -!- raedah [~x@172.58.40.9] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
12:06 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:12 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
12:19 -!- raedah [~x@172.58.40.9] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:19 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:19 -!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@unaffiliated/debruyne] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
12:21 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:21 -!- se3000 [~textual@38.125.163.25] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
12:22 -!- molz [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
12:22 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:24 -!- molly [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
12:26 -!- raedah [~x@172.58.40.9] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
12:32 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
12:34 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:39 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:39 -!- jtimon [~quassel@217.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
12:40 -!- jtimon [~quassel@217.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:43 -!- Inaltoasinistra [~jonathan@212.124.183.127] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:44 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:44 -!- Inaltoas1nistra [~jonathan@88-149-163-147.v4.ngi.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
12:50 -!- Alanius_ is now known as Alanius
12:53 < bsm117532> What would go horribly wrong with a coin that had *difficulty* as its token.  (Instead of filtering difficulty through a time-based reward schedule)  The avantage is that difficulty is fungible with itself, so it would allow chains to be merged without relying on synchronized clocks.
12:54 -!- nonaTure [~nonaTure@053dbb41.dynamic.tele-ag.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
12:57 < katu_> bsm117532: be less vague
12:57 < katu_> what is "difficulty as its token"
12:57 < katu_> eg. give example
12:58 -!- nonaTure [~nonaTure@053dbb41.dynamic.tele-ag.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
12:58 < bsm117532> E.g. if you mine a coin at today's difficulty of 209453158595, you would have exactly 209453158595 Satoshis to spend.
12:59 < vyvojar> if you want non-pyramid scheme, its been tried before in altcoins many times
12:59 < bsm117532> Coin creation would be weighted towards later times, instead of earlier times with Satoshi's schedule R(t) = 100BTC*2^(t/4 years)
12:59 < vyvojar> you break early adopter incentive and tuhs speculative value
12:59 < vyvojar> end result: such altcoins tanked faster than usual
12:59 < bsm117532> vyvojar: Has it?  Do you have any links?
13:00 < vyvojar> bsm117532: most of these were outright ridiculous schemes, but generally broke the deflationary rule. i think one was called like 'magi'
13:01 < vyvojar> just pour through btctalk trashbin
13:01 < vyvojar> *pore
13:01 < bsm117532> ugh.
13:01 < vyvojar> bsm117532: it can work very well in cryptocommodities
13:01 < kanzure> how is that not hashcash/powpay
13:01 < vyvojar> (ie if somebody manages to implement successful proof of storage for storage renting)
13:01 < bsm117532> kanzure: It is.
13:02 < kanzure> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201920.0
13:02 < bsm117532> I can always rely on you to have something relevant at your fingertips kanzure.  ;-)
13:03 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
13:03 < kanzure> yes.. fingertips... http://xkcd.com/1530/
13:03 < bsm117532> I've been thinking about it because I want to merge forks, and in order to do so you have to know how to value coins created on each side of the fork.
13:03 < bsm117532> Nice try kanzure, but I've met you in person!  :-P
13:03 < katu_> vyvojar: there's been nothing like to the date afaik, how can you be so sure about speculation?
13:04 < kanzure> bsm117532: like petertodd, that was a hired actor.
13:05 < vyvojar> bsm117532: i dont think you need to break the usual incentives for that. simply keep increasing divide factor (equivalent of halving, maybe more aggresive), but otherwise base reward pegged (before divisor) to hash rate
13:06 < bsm117532> vyovar You've just described bitcoin, up to a constant factor BTC/difficulty.
13:06 < vyvojar> yes, the magic is this is not bitcoin
13:06 < vyvojar> because hash rate peg
13:06 < vyvojar> if it halves, but hash rate doubles in the mean time, reward is still the same
13:06 < bsm117532> But you said halving too.  ;-)
13:06 < vyvojar> THE PEG
13:07 < bsm117532> But yes, another way to think of it is that difficulty adjustments are only to keep the block rate coming at a regular pace, and don't change coin allocation.
13:07 < bsm117532> Yes a peg, we're saying the same thing.
13:07 -!- nonaTure [~nonaTure@053dbb41.dynamic.tele-ag.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
13:08 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
13:08 < katu_> bsm117532, vyvojar one consequence of that would be coin inflation is no longer predictable
13:09 < bsm117532> katu_ correct.  It's closer to the usual definition of "mining" in that regard.
13:11 < bsm117532> I've come to see mining as posting an external economic asset into the crypto-coin.  Any other usage is an IOU.
13:12 < katu_> 22:06 < vyvojar> if it halves, but hash rate doubles in the mean time, reward is still the same
13:12 < katu_> no, this does not guarantee pyramid
13:12 -!- sparetire [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
13:12 < bsm117532> Anyway, this was really about merging forks.  You don't want to have to reallocate coins in the event of a merge.  I've figured out how to make a continuous reward schedule with braids (no halvings) but a merge requires the two sides to agree on their *clocks* as well as rewards.
13:12 < katu_> hash rate can simply overshoot
13:12 < katu_> eg. asics
13:12 < katu_> ton of black swans
13:13 < bsm117532> katu_: Another way of justifying the reward schedule is that early hardware is less efficient than late hardware, but this is a curve that is hard to predict.
13:13 < bsm117532> And it certainly doesn't justify the reward going all the way to zero.
13:14 < vyvojar> katu_: oh, right. but wouldnt hw eventually start copying moores law (ie asic die shrink) ?
13:14 < katu_> vyvojar: possibly, just make sure to make your halvings faster than moores. even then, you basically pray that moore's law holds.
13:15 < katu_> bsm117532: indeed, theres always potential for inflation, only bitcoin has hard cap. i dont consider this wise idea.
13:16 < katu_> (assuming the demand is massively speculative which it seems it is, at least early in the life of a coin)
13:16 < bsm117532> Another possibility would be to have the reward decay to a non-zero constant.  In the long time limit it would be equal (or equivalent to) a difficulty-based coin.
13:18 < vyvojar> bsm117532: what do you mean reward decay, you mean some sort of ceiling on reward at any given time?
13:19 < bsm117532> vyvojar: Take a reward schedule: R(t,d) = (100 BTC)*(exp(t/tau)+d)   t=time, d=difficulty, tau=(4 years)/ln(2)
13:20 < bsm117532> vyvojar: Take a reward schedule: R(t,d) = (100 BTC)*(exp((-)t/tau)+d)   t=time, d=difficulty, tau=(4 years)/ln(2)
13:20 < bsm117532> important minus sign inserted.
13:21 < bsm117532> d needs to be divided by some "initial difficulty" factor.
13:21 < katu_> bsm117532: d can always outpace your t value
13:21 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
13:21 < bsm117532> Yes, it can.  If the purpose is to incentivize early investors, that's not a huge problem.
13:22 < bsm117532> Or if the purpose is to compensate for hardware shrinks, you're just saying Moore's law came too fast and the transition to difficulty-based coin happened earlier.
13:22 < katu_> no, it is a huge problem. bitcoin is 7 years old now, and conjencture is that it relies on its pyramid property heavily. also you cant make predictions like that, maybe somebody will do asics in 2 months. its all too weak.
13:23 -!- markus-k_ [~markus-k@p4FCCD693.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
13:25 < bsm117532> katu_: think about the long-time limit. One is actually *expending* real-world assets.  If this isn't compensated by *creation* in the coin, this will place a cap on the value that enters the coin.
13:25 < bsm117532> tx fees are a zero sum game.  No one will expend very much external assets to acquire them.
13:26 < katu_> yes, it is all speculation. the consensus is that a lot of people "hodl" because they know exactly that their stakes are given and cant be devalued (in absolute bitcoin terms, not usd).
13:26 < katu_> the moment you put uncertainty in there things get ... uncertain, and thus your currency is far less attractive for speculation
13:27 < vyvojar> as i said, simply dont rely on pyramid and do something else, ie a commodity :)
13:27 < vyvojar> storage, bandwidth
13:27 < bsm117532> or difficulty.  ;-)
13:27 < vyvojar> (really hard to implement, maybe not even possible)
13:27 < vyvojar> bsm117532: difficulty is not commodity.
13:27 < vyvojar> outsiders wont buy it for its intrinsic value.
13:28 < bsm117532> As a proxy for CPU power or electricity, it certainly is.
13:28 < bsm117532> vyvojar: It has no value.  It certainly has a *cost*.
13:28 < vyvojar> what we're talking about is elastic supply. inflation as whatever commodity (eg storage server "hashrate" grow), deflation if it shrinks.
13:29 < vyvojar> this makes it extremely unattractive for speculation
13:29 < vyvojar> but
13:29 < vyvojar> the tokens will have still value, simply by the virtue of service provided to customers
13:29 < vyvojar> in fact, the value could be even quite stable.
13:29 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
13:30 < bsm117532> I think it would be quite stable.  It's the only way invented to cause individual database rows to have a non-negligible cost, and therefore, become valuable as a medium of exchange.
13:30 < vyvojar> bsm117532: note that new coins are "minted" only if total supply increases. if the network hashrate flatlines, no new coins are minted, miners get all their reward by simply providing service.
13:30 < bsm117532> Everything else is IOUs.
13:31 < bsm117532> vyvojar: correct.  I don't think that's a stable situation because of the ease of performing a 51% attack.
13:32 < vyvojar> indeed, its all rather theoretical
13:32 < bsm117532> So it seems to me that any coin actually does need there to be continuous creation of new coins.
13:32 < vyvojar> and all proof of storage schemes i've seen are NaS-like
13:32 < vyvojar> adding to the injury :(
13:32 < bsm117532> This is why PoW works -- it sacrifices an external asset.  Storage doesn't actually sacrifice the asset.
13:33 < vyvojar> indeed, storage is PoS-like
13:33 -!- nonaTure [~nonaTure@053dbb41.dynamic.tele-ag.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
13:33 < bsm117532> Though you could argue for the time-value of storage, and then the asset sacrificed is electricity to run your HDDs and replacement costs for failure.
13:34 < vyvojar> bsm117532: well, thats the general idea of providing open storage market
13:34 < vyvojar> the contracts are size*duration, contract default is failing to provide proof of storage etc
13:34 < bsm117532> Honestly I haven't dug into the storage question :-/
13:35 < vyvojar> bsm117532: i did a bit and it's not looking good :( have a stab at it though, it would be really interesting to have cryptocommodity
13:35 < bsm117532> Taek is around here somewhere...
13:35 < vyvojar> if storage happens, anything which can be online-proved can work similiarly (ie bandwidth, or even some mechanical-turk like contracts)
13:37 < katu_> vyvojar: for all intents and purposes, bitcoin style is the simplest. just provide irrefutable guarantee that it cant suddenly inflate at any later time, and speculators do the rest :)
13:37 < bsm117532> FWIW I think having proof of storage is very important.  It's a big piece of sharding the UTXO set and guaranteeing the whole schebang is still consistent!
13:39 < vyvojar> bsm117532: that could be already done. nodes prioritizing network communication in exchange for storage proofs, ie tit-for-tat style, trivial online proof commitment. but it cant be easily commoditized into full blown economy as a central token.
13:39 < vyvojar> at least im not sure how it could be done :/ i suppose something very vaguely broken like a PoS could work, but ..
13:40 -!- bildramer [~bildramer@p2003004D2B377800AC9BCCA14258DFA9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
13:40 -!- adamg [~akg@50.242.93.33] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
13:41 -!- bildramer [~bildramer@p2003004D2B377800AC9BCCA14258DFA9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
13:43 < katu_> vyvojar: run a PoW coin, and have this as side tx consensus rule. ie miners can snitch on storage nodes which fail on their continuous storage proof contract.
13:43 -!- nonaTure [~nonaTure@053dbb41.dynamic.tele-ag.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
13:44 < vyvojar> katu_: huh?
13:45 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
13:45 < katu_> vyvojar: basically a script extended with oracle opcode "check this storage proof of bond XYZ", online
13:46 < vyvojar> katu_: erm, nope.
13:46 < vyvojar> katu_: first, split network view, ie not all miners can possible arrive at the same answer.
13:47 < vyvojar> katu_: second, just do fidelity bonds off chain for a service, like wifi hotspots in payment channel :)
13:48 < vyvojar> the point is to base whole chain on this (ie base miner incentive is _only_ this), its not stashed on the side. this would get rid of the immense energy cost currently attached to each transaction.
13:51 < katu_> vyvojar: Well, the cost will go down the moment mining rewards are gone and its all tx funded (presumably, blocks will be *very* large)
13:52 < katu_> for bonds, the network would not be self-organizing, it would be something like oniontip is now .. things would gravitate to few central providers pooling the bonds, which is why the oracle idea.
13:54 < katu_> you have a point about the split view, though :(
13:58 < vyvojar> katu_: BTW, the most interesting research relating to this is various proposals to reward Tor relays, similiar problem, but bandwidth (which is harder to prove, as there is no succinct proof)
14:21 -!- MaxSan_ [~one@82.145.37.203] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
14:25 -!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
14:31 < amiller_> storage is a consumable resource
14:31 < amiller_> if you're storing one thing, you can't also be storing another thing
14:31 < amiller_> i don't get your point bsm117532
14:32 < bsm117532> amiller_: which point?  about the time-value of storage?
14:32 < amiller_> even if you aren't spending any electricit
14:32 < amiller_> or replacing for failure
14:32 < amiller_> it's still a resource you can spend
14:33 < bsm117532> But it has zero marginal cost to you.  This is why no one pays for individual database rows.
14:34 < amiller_> i think that's a distortion because of not having good ways to allocate or distribute it, it does seem that way but it's because of these other effects
14:34 < amiller_> physically it's a limited a resource
14:35 < bsm117532> So is air.  But you don't worry about running out of air when another person enters the room.  It's *marginal* cost is zero.  You don't worry about the cost of storing one more byte.
14:36 < amiller_> that could change rapidly
14:37 < amiller_> ilke, right now there isn't any way for me to monetize my storage
14:37 < bsm117532> And when it does we'll see a market develop for storage coins.  ;-)
14:37 < amiller_> if there were, then i'd use it all up, and then i wouldn't have any more unless i bought more hard drives and rented more rooms to store them in
14:37 < amiller_> yeah ok fair enough
14:38 < amiller_> when bitcoin started, cpu cycles were free, becuase no one had a way of monetizing their old laptops and last year's gaming gpus
14:38 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Quit: brb]
14:38 < bsm117532> Yes, it wasn't until real value in terms of GPUs and ASICs became serious that its price started climbing.
14:38 < bsm117532> When the marginal cost of generating bitcoins was zero, someone paid 10,000 BTC for a pizza.
14:40 < bsm117532> If people were planning out their "storage mining rigs" the way they did for BTC, LTC, and ETH, we'd be in a different realm.
14:41 < bsm117532> amiller_: what's your opinion on that, are we still lacking algorithms to make that work?
14:42 < r0ach> aren't storage as a resource coins doomed since you need to apply a continous wear to the source, otherwise you end up with fractional reserve storage, so you're really replicating PoW?  But maybe it can be replicating PoW using less energy in some manner...
14:42 < amiller_> bsm117532, yes, still lacking, i think bramc and the SpaceMint folks at mit and austria are getting close
14:43 < amiller_> r0ach, the hope is that the continuous wear can be very small relative to the amount of storage needed
14:45 < r0ach> once you think it through all the way to the end
14:46 < r0ach> it honestly seems like it would centralize more
14:49 < r0ach> You're giving the most benefit to the fabs to crank out high volume storage at lowest marginal cost.  That means just 1 single variable.  Right now you two 2 main variables, access to the fabs at a low price, plus good marginal cost of energy...
14:50 < r0ach> but of course after sha256d is commoditized, it would go to 1 variable for BTC of just energy
14:52 < r0ach> For the sake of argument, I'm going to say there is a much greater ability for entrepreneurs to try and find/create a low marginal cost energy setup than them trying to build a fab to create state of the art storage.  So the gateway into the system might be more "permissionless" with energy as the main factor.
14:53 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
14:57 < bsm117532> From a physics perspective, data storage is just entropy.  (Think Shannon entropy)  The two are inter-convertible.
15:02 < r0ach> I'm definitely seeing storage PoW as worse now.  We all know 1 BTC confirmation is completely arbitrary and meaningless since Satoshi didn't solve Byzantine generals.  So the only way confirmations are useful is leveraging the fact they have no upper limit with the idea that cost to attack is high and can't be sustained, yet with storage having a low marginal cost to sustain.
15:02 < r0ach> Your entire security model goes out the window IMO...
15:06 -!- grashopr [~grashopr@host31-48-228-104.range31-48.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
15:07 -!- grashopr__ [~grashopr@host31-48-228-104.range31-48.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
15:14 -!- shesek [~shesek@bzq-84-110-108-87.cablep.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
15:14 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:497:816f:c47d:e481] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
15:16 < bsm117532> r0ach: interesting argument.  Indeed Satoshi's solution places an assumption on the resources of an attacker, instead of identifying generals.  I've made this argument before.... "Your coin is secure as long as an attacker can't hold up a Google data center".
15:17 < bsm117532> (Frankly I strongly dislike identifying generals/nodes in the first place...but assumptions about resources are difficult to make).
15:24 -!- Davasny_ [~quassel@195.150.236.122] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
15:25 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:e8f2:7479:f4a0:ca9e] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
15:26 -!- Davasny [~quassel@78-11-193-195.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
15:28 -!- Cory [~C@unaffiliated/cory] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
15:31 -!- Cory [~C@unaffiliated/cory] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
15:39 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]
15:47 -!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@unaffiliated/debruyne] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
15:47 < vyvojar> amiller_: the storage is contract of time*objectsize, not just objectsize.
15:47 < vyvojar> as for spacemint and filecoin, arent these broadcast schemes? you dont want it to work like that.
15:47 < vyvojar> put/get requests
15:48 < amiller_> what do you mean by broadcast schemes?
15:48 < vyvojar> put/get
15:48 < vyvojar> and random pickers
15:48 < vyvojar> also economics of filecoin are all over the place
15:48 < vyvojar> anyhow, read the log what i had in mind :)
15:48 < amiller_> filecoin is put/get and spacemint is not
15:49 < amiller_> yeah time*objectsize is more what i had in mind not just objectsize
15:50 < vyvojar> amiller_: spacemint is not what i had in mind (its just another naive burstcoin)
15:50 < amiller_> i have no idea what you mean by 'naive burstcoin'
15:50 < vyvojar> its literally quoted in spacemint paper
15:51 < vyvojar> spacemint relies on tightrope nash to "solve" NaS
15:51 < vyvojar> which is no solution at all
15:51 < amiller_> tightrope nash?
15:52 < amiller_> anyway i didn't advocate spacemint
15:52 < vyvojar> anyhow, until this issue is addrssed
15:52 < amiller_> they have a proof of space protocol that, while i think there is a flaw in it, is good and i think can be fixed
15:52 < vyvojar> its basically dead in water :(
15:52 < vyvojar> oh, if you mean PoS primitive
15:52 < vyvojar> there are plenty of reliable ones
15:53 < vyvojar> thats not the issue
15:53 < vyvojar> (PoS=pospace in this case)
15:53 < amiller_> all the known constructions have problems with "grinding" or amortization basically
15:54 < vyvojar> yep
15:54 < amiller_> so the question is if that can be fixed
15:54 < vyvojar> it will have have to completely abandon the misguided idea of peercoin
15:55 < vyvojar> amiller_: the good news that the resource *is* external, ie one cant rewrite reality as is the case with stake. problem is merely with mining of multiple forks.
15:56 -!- Davasny_ [~quassel@195.150.236.122] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
15:56 < vyvojar> bad news the proof is online one, so its even dubious if its worth it to keep blockchain, since the guarantees will be more closer to that of say, ripple
15:59 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
16:02 -!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@unaffiliated/debruyne] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
16:11 -!- Starduster_ is now known as Starduster
16:44 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:e8f2:7479:f4a0:ca9e] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
17:02 -!- hazirafel [~hazirafel@bzq-79-176-75-117.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
17:37 -!- MoALTz [~no@78-11-183-124.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
17:52 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
17:52 -!- rasengan [rasengan@pdpc/corporate-sponsor/privateinternetaccess.com/rasengan] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.6-frutas]
17:54 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
18:10 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~Chris_Ste@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
18:36 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
18:38 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
18:44 -!- AdrianG [~User@unaffiliated/amphetamine] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
18:47 -!- heretolearn [uid110997@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-elcgsfqfjgavchst] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
18:54 -!- pro [~pro@unaffiliated/pro] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
19:09 -!- jtimon [~quassel@217.31.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
19:11 -!- Noldorin [~noldorin@unaffiliated/noldorin] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
19:47 -!- King_Rex [~King_Rex@unaffiliated/king-rex/x-3258444] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
19:53 -!- copumpkin [~copumpkin@haskell/developer/copumpkin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
19:58 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
20:05 -!- bitcoin-wizards1 [6302c70e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.99.2.199.14] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
20:09 -!- bitcoin-wizards1 [6302c70e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.99.2.199.14] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
20:11 -!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-174-97-254-80.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
20:25 -!- copumpkin [~copumpkin@haskell/developer/copumpkin] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
20:32 -!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
21:05 -!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-jooohmrqpvlwsjly] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
21:36 -!- BlueMatt [~BlueMatt@unaffiliated/bluematt] has quit [Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in]
21:38 -!- BlueMatt [~BlueMatt@unaffiliated/bluematt] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
21:45 -!- [7] [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Disconnected by services]
21:45 -!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
22:41 -!- heretolearn [uid110997@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-elcgsfqfjgavchst] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
22:47 < r0ach> fluffy, I think you might be the smartest person in this room being able to talk about flexcaps for 1 hour straight without even breathing in between
22:50  * bsm117532 scrolls up...
22:52 < r0ach> on youtube:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM2ra-LzMQk&feature=youtu.be
22:53 < bsm117532> Oh god, that means I'm probably up there too...
22:54 < bsm117532> Good to attach names to faces.  :-)
22:55 < bsm117532> Also I would like to give a huge THUMBS DOWN on any future online conferences.  They suck.
22:56 < bsm117532> It wasn't my first one.  They're always disasters.
23:02 -!- Aranjedeath [~Aranjedea@unaffiliated/aranjedeath] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
23:02 -!- roman_ [~quassel@2a01:cb1d:4a4:2e00:e0e1:3471:3a79:16d8] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
23:07 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
23:09 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
23:11 -!- N0S4A2 [~weechat@216-243-38-141.users.condointernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
23:24 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
23:26 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
23:51 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
23:53 -!- Alopex [~bitcoin@cyber.dealing.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-wizards
23:55 -!- vyvojar [~v@ns382631.ovh.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
--- Log closed Sun Jun 26 00:00:40 2016