--- Log opened Thu Aug 10 00:00:45 2017 00:06 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 00:32 -!- d_t [~d_t@108-65-78-188.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 00:45 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 01:07 -!- dnaleor [~dnaleor@78-23-74-78.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 01:10 -!- d_t [~d_t@108-65-78-188.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 01:17 -!- BashCo_ [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 01:18 -!- daszorz [~daszorz@188.94.18.118] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 01:19 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 01:33 -!- BashCo_ [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 02:40 -!- CheckDavid [uid14990@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mxoaldetjklhyjan] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 02:47 -!- pro [~pro@unaffiliated/pro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 02:51 -!- g0d355__ [~lmao@104.131.75.159] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 02:56 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 03:04 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 03:40 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 03:57 -!- JackH [~laptop@46.231.18.66] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 04:01 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 04:06 -!- _whitelogger [~whitelogg@uruz.whitequark.org] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 04:07 -!- _whitelogger [~whitelogg@uruz.whitequark.org] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 04:08 -!- Noldorin [~noldorin@unaffiliated/noldorin] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 04:30 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 04:50 -!- CheckDavid [uid14990@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mxoaldetjklhyjan] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 04:59 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 05:38 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/chrisstewart5/x-62865615] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 05:38 < kanzure> .tw https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/895557678017110016 05:38 < yoleaux> @VitalikButerin Erasure coding has been known for ages as an attempted solution to the fraud proof problem; gmaxwell suggested it years ago. (@petertoddbtc, in reply to tw:895555712096419841) 05:38 < kanzure> .tw https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/895558069114896384 05:38 < yoleaux> @VitalikButerin It's also been known for ages that it doesn't work, as large-scale financial fraud can be hidden in arbitrarily small amounts of data. (@petertoddbtc, in reply to tw:895557678017110016) 05:41 < kanzure> "CVE-2017-7781/CVE-2017-10176: Issue with elliptic curve addition in mixed Jacobian-affine coordinates in Firefox/Java" http://blog.intothesymmetry.com/2017/08/cve-2017-7781cve-2017-10176-issue-with.html https://twitter.com/asanso/status/895253880572960768 05:43 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/chrisstewart5/x-62865615] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.4] 05:44 < kanzure> petertodd: don't you only need to protect against certain forms of fraud (such as: double spending, but not against bad scripts since client-side validation can handle that)? 05:59 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/chrisstewart5/x-62865615] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 06:26 -!- rgrant [~rgrant@unaffiliated/rgrant] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 06:32 < instagibbs> kanzure, pretty sure the discussion is on withheld data in a treechain like setting 06:32 < kanzure> you still need replay protection in treechainland 06:32 < kanzure> er i mean, anti-replay 07:04 -!- deusexbeer [~deusexbee@079-170-138-094-dynamic-pool-adsl.wbt.ru] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 07:05 -!- deusexbeer [~deusexbee@093-092-178-248-dynamic-pool-adsl.wbt.ru] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 07:08 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 07:16 -!- rockhouse [~rockhouse@h54110.upc-h.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 07:18 -!- Guyver2 [~Guyver@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)] 08:03 -!- Aaronva__ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 08:06 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 08:12 -!- Murch [~murch@96-82-80-28-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 08:20 -!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 08:35 -!- dnaleor [~dnaleor@78-23-74-78.access.telenet.be] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 08:38 -!- daszorz [~daszorz@188.94.18.118] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 08:40 -!- Aaronva__ is now known as AaronvanW 08:45 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:58 -!- Guest51547 [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 08:58 -!- prime_ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 09:13 -!- pro [~pro@unaffiliated/pro] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 09:32 -!- _rht [uid86914@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ovaupsfibjlfxxsg] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 09:33 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 09:34 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 09:38 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 10:02 -!- abpa [~abpa@96-82-80-28-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 10:08 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 10:10 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 10:25 -!- Noldorin [~noldorin@unaffiliated/noldorin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 10:38 -!- d_t [~d_t@108-65-78-188.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 10:53 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@91.177.138.19] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 10:54 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 10:57 < rgrant> .title http://plasma.io 10:57 < yoleaux> Plasma: Scalable Autonomous Smart Contracts 11:13 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 11:13 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 11:14 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 11:14 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 11:16 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 11:17 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 11:17 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 11:40 -!- danrobinson [~danrobins@2604:2000:e080:d400:51b9:c006:3702:4aff] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 11:40 -!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 11:42 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 11:44 -!- _rht [uid86914@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ovaupsfibjlfxxsg] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 11:48 -!- daszorz [~daszorz@cpc106809-live29-2-0-cust896.17-2.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 11:51 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 11:53 -!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@176.158.157.202] has quit [Client Quit] 11:55 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:00 -!- brutefruit [brutefruit@gateway/shell/panicbnc/x-wpcbwnktxeatpyyy] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 12:05 -!- brutefruit [brutefruit@gateway/shell/panicbnc/x-gqzuoelhkjaxjmsc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:10 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.] 12:11 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:15 -!- harrymm [~wayne@125.227.200.197] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 12:16 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@tmo-110-77.customers.d1-online.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:16 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.] 12:17 -!- prime__ [~quassel@5.146.5.174] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:18 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:20 -!- prime_ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 12:21 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@tmo-110-77.customers.d1-online.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 12:29 -!- gribble [~gribble@unaffiliated/nanotube/bot/gribble] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 12:31 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-68-243.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:41 -!- JackH [~laptop@46.231.18.66] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 12:43 -!- gribble [~gribble@unaffiliated/nanotube/bot/gribble] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:46 -!- tromp [~tromp@ip-217-103-3-94.ip.prioritytelecom.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 12:50 -!- Cory [~Cory@unaffiliated/cory] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 12:55 -!- Pasha [~Cory@unaffiliated/cory] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 12:57 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 12:58 -!- prime_ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:00 -!- Pasha is now known as Cory 13:00 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:01 -!- prime__ [~quassel@5.146.5.174] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 13:04 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 13:10 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.9] 13:11 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:13 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@unaffiliated/tiagotrs] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:14 -!- tromp [~tromp@ip-217-103-3-94.ip.prioritytelecom.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:18 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-68-243.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 13:18 -!- tromp [~tromp@ip-217-103-3-94.ip.prioritytelecom.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 13:26 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 13:29 < petertodd> kanzure: client side validating scripts is the *easy* part; preventing double-spends is where all the difficulty is 13:29 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:31 < petertodd> kanzure: hmm... actually, maybe that's the wrong way to say it: mechanisms that succesfully prevent double spends all seem to require the same data necessary to validate scripts, so solving double-spends ends up solving script validity; equally they're essentially the same problem, as the definition of a double-spend depends on script validity 13:32 < petertodd> instagibbs: it's not, vitalik appears to be talking about a very different type of system than client-side validated treechains 13:32 < petertodd> instagibbs: notably, the description of treechains in that paper is weird and misses the point 13:32 -!- tromp [~tromp@ip-217-103-3-94.ip.prioritytelecom.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:33 -!- prime_ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 13:33 < betawaffle> petertodd: can you share the point? (for my education) 13:34 < kanzure> you don't need the scripts if you are just making sure there's no double spends 13:35 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-68-243.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:35 < kanzure> anyway, double spends can't be hidden in arbitarily small amounts of data. there's a minimum size to have a spend at all. 13:35 < petertodd> kanzure: yes you do: if you can't validate the scripts I can burn your coins with a *fake* unauthorized doublespend 13:36 < kanzure> fine, use a spending authorization. but it doesn't have to be the whole script. 13:36 -!- prime_ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:36 < petertodd> kanzure: my phrasing "arbitrarily small" is in relation to the whole of transaction history - as in the fraud where inflation happens can be a single txout 13:36 < petertodd> kanzure: now, there *are* potential systems that change that property, like the limited volume schemes I've discussed on this channel a few years ago, but ethereum isn't one of those schemes 13:37 < kanzure> i think there is value on focusing on the anti-replay problem with this redundant encoding scheme stuff 13:37 < petertodd> kanzure: indeed it doesn't - I've proposed using the revealing of a hash committed nonce as a "trigger" for proof-of-publication-based single-use-seals, but the whole script *still* needs to be revealed even in that case (albeit, it can be encrypted so that only participants can understand it) 13:38 < kanzure> you need an encoding scheme where fraud can be proven such that if there's not a single sig authorizing the inclusion of the transaction in the block, then the error code should be able to flag this 13:40 -!- airbreather [~airbreath@d149-67-99-43.nap.wideopenwest.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:40 < petertodd> kanzure: explain? what do you mean by "single sig"? 13:40 < kanzure> well you need a list of inputs, if it's not signed by the owner then its inclusion in the block is irrelevant, right? 13:41 -!- blackwraith [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:41 < petertodd> kanzure: wait, so you're assuming the transaction itself will be in a block? what exact type of system are you talking about here? 13:41 < kanzure> btw, what are we talking about? is there a pdf? 13:41 -!- airbreather [~airbreath@d149-67-99-43.nap.wideopenwest.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:42 < petertodd> kanzure: a pdf for what part? :) 13:42 < kanzure> i thought there was an error correction code used over the whole block, and the goal is a system where you can prove fraud merely by showing that there were inconsistent query results when different peers tried certain queries over the data 13:43 -!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] 13:43 < petertodd> kanzure: nope, that's not enough: the query wouldn't be inconsistent - that's easy - the query would be denied 13:44 < kanzure> well that's the same as the current situation in bitcoin: you don't choose a chaintip unless you have the data or good crypto reason to accept 13:46 < petertodd> kanzure: ah, but the whole point of this stuff is to achieve a scaling improvement 13:47 -!- daszorz [~daszorz@cpc106809-live29-2-0-cust896.17-2.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:47 < petertodd> kanzure: see, note how the plasma admits it has a honest minority assumption - an assumption that *other people* are doing certain validation tasks properly. 13:48 < kanzure> oh is plasma what we're tlaking about? 13:48 < petertodd> kanzure: ignoring erasure encoding, I obviously could have a system where I assume that collectively I and others have validated a sufficient amount of a chain to detect fraud 13:48 < kanzure> (didn't know. reading is hard.) 13:49 < petertodd> kanzure: heh :) 13:49 < kanzure> hm wait why do you need to assume hte other validation results are correct, they are not proofs ? 13:49 < kanzure> you need to precommit with your peers as to which ones of you are doing what queries 13:49 < kanzure> and then if any of them abort, you need to take on that extra load 13:49 < petertodd> kanzure: basically, because to fully validate even an erasure encoded system, you need just as much data as without the erasure encoding 13:50 < betawaffle> erasure-coding != compression 13:50 < petertodd> betawaffle: exactly 13:51 < kanzure> sec, you are saying erasure coding validaion of individual proofs is ottal more work than.. er. 13:51 < petertodd> kanzure: because if those other peers aren't actually validating, they haven't helped you in any way - consider the case where fraud has been hidden in a part of the chain that you don't have, and you're assuming someone else validated it - erasure encoding or not, you still have that problem 13:51 -!- daszorz [~daszorz@cpc106809-live29-2-0-cust896.17-2.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:51 < kanzure> their validation effort should result in a proof of some kind 13:51 < kanzure> it should not be trust the peer results -_- 13:51 < betawaffle> kanzure: that's the dream ;) 13:51 < petertodd> kanzure: but see, currently other than moon math we don't know how to create a proof of validation for doublespends 13:52 < petertodd> kanzure: incidentally, I was talking to one of the zksnarks team about this - specifically treechains - and we came to the conclusion that if they do crack the recursive zksnark problem - and they think they're close - treechains will be easy to implement 13:52 < kanzure> what are the bounds on the proof sizes from the peers here? 13:52 < petertodd> kanzure: no erasure encoding needed :) 13:53 < kanzure> i am not convinced it must always be larger than just downloading the full block data or w/e 13:53 < kanzure> (or more cost than bandwidth+validate of the original data) 13:53 < petertodd> kanzure: an anti-doublespend proof is exceptionally hard, because a single double-spend that isn't caught breaks the whole system - I have a scheme to reduce the size of that by a linear factor, but no better than that 13:54 < petertodd> kanzure: I'm not saying it must be *larger*, I'm just saying it's no *smaller* 13:54 < kanzure> and what is the strength of the proof that it is no smaller? where is that coming from. 13:55 -!- Dyaheon [~Dya@a91-156-192-39.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 13:55 < petertodd> kanzure: what do you mean "proof"? erasure encoding simply takes a message k long, and transforms it into a message n long where n>k, such that the original message can be recovered by any k symbols out of n - that's obviously not smaller than not usin erasure encoding in the first place 13:56 < betawaffle> petertodd: i don't think he's asking about erasure coding 13:56 -!- Dyaheon [~Dya@a91-156-192-39.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:56 < kanzure> beween peers you transfer some proofs that you did some validation work over a part of the erasure encoded block 13:57 < kanzure> you have mmade the claim that the total transfer or work for each of these peers will be strictly no smaller than just validating the erasure-encoded block in the first place (in totality) 13:57 < betawaffle> how do you prove validation? 13:57 < betawaffle> well, even that would be an improvement on reality 13:57 < kanzure> you could probably do lots of two-way trusted snarks between your trusted peers 13:58 -!- rjak2 [~rjak@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/rjak] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 13:58 -!- rjak [~rjak@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/rjak] has quit [Disconnected by services] 13:58 < kanzure> s/two-way/one-way 13:58 -!- rjak2 is now known as rjak 13:58 < betawaffle> wait, trusted peers? 13:58 < kanzure> you are trusting them to do the work they promised. then you check their results. 13:58 < kanzure> try to keep up! :-) 13:59 < petertodd> kanzure: by "validation work", what exactly do you mean by "validation"? 13:59 < betawaffle> :D 13:59 < kanzure> petertodd: checking the chunf of erasure encoded block maybe? i'm not sure. this is underspecified. 14:00 < kanzure> hah chunfs 14:00 < petertodd> kanzure: like, can we nail this down to, say, a proof-of-publication index to shorten proofs-of-non-doublespend? 14:00 < petertodd> kanzure: remember that erasure encoding just lets us recover a data structure - you still need to validate that data structure 14:01 < kanzure> right, but it's sharded validation of some kind (i don't know if this is the right term) 14:01 < betawaffle> sharded sounds implausible 14:01 < petertodd> kanzure: you'd have to say what exactly is being validated there still :) 14:02 < betawaffle> with a subset of data, you can't prove lack of doublespends 14:03 < petertodd> kanzure: note that plasma is proposing a system that as far as I can tell assumes *multiple* currencies, that aren't actually fungible for each other 14:03 < kanzure> betawaffle: ordered data can help 14:03 < betawaffle> fair 14:03 < kanzure> petertodd: i really haven't read the paper. 14:04 < petertodd> kanzure: heh, I'm not sure I can say I've "read" the paper either, as it appears to be intentionally written to be obtuse enough that I'd need to spend quite a few more hours on it :) 14:04 < waxwing> heh sergio was just complaining how long it is :) 14:05 < betawaffle> "just make it long enough for the serious people to get bored" 14:05 < petertodd> kanzure: what *I'd* call sharded validation, is the idea that we have a commitment to a data structure - not unlike a merkle sum tree - such that the data structure is validated in parts for self-consistency, with the assumption that the total set of validators achieved complete coverage of it. Again, a merkle-sum-tree is a perfect example 14:05 < petertodd> betawaffle: it also includes nonsense like talking in terms of "computation"... 14:05 < kanzure> why that assumption about total set of validators. is this different from the trust yo peers thing? 14:06 < petertodd> kanzure: actually, "assumption" is the wrong word to use, I mean "somehow" we have to ensure that the validators have achieved complete coverage of it - or in some schemes, *sufficient* coverage 14:06 < kanzure> yes but it shouldn't be based on a trusted set of validators that you join.... 14:06 < petertodd> kanzure: for example, in my prior volume-limited ideas, sufficient coverage could be less than 100% as fraud - IE inflation - could be bounded 14:07 < petertodd> kanzure: exactly, equally, in a fintech environment, the fact that you *can* define a trusted set of validators makes scaling up quite easy - the basis of my proofchains work 14:08 < petertodd> kanzure: corda for example is apaprently going as far as to rely on SGX, which will be trivially scalable at the expense of giving Intel the ability to commit serious financial fraud 14:08 < betawaffle> oh, intel would never... 14:08 < kanzure> "oops one of our server management opcodes interfered" 14:10 < petertodd> betawaffle: I have a sneaking suspicion that at least some engineers in Intel are horrified by Corda's plans :) 14:10 < betawaffle> i bet 14:10 < betawaffle> petertodd: you don't know such engineers!? 14:10 * betawaffle is surprised 14:10 < petertodd> betawaffle: not to say that corda is necessarily *insecure* - in the context of fintech there are ways to mitigate SGX vulnerabilities w/ volume-related auditing, but it's definitely not trivial to get right 14:11 < kanzure> no doxxing 14:11 < petertodd> betawaffle: I don't actually know anyone on the SGX team 14:11 < petertodd> betawaffle: (at least, on a personal level) 14:12 < waxwing> a trust point is a security hole; the risk is never *only* fraud committed by the trust point itself. 14:13 < betawaffle> bingo 14:16 -!- prime_ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 14:20 < kanzure> http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2017-08-04.log 14:22 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:22 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:24 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:24 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:25 -!- prime_ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:25 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:25 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:26 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:26 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:27 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:27 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:27 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:27 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:28 < petertodd> kanzure: ? 14:28 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:28 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:29 < kanzure> just previous erasure coding logs 14:29 < kanzure> backlinks. 14:29 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:29 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:31 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:31 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:31 -!- danrobinson [~danrobins@2604:2000:e080:d400:51b9:c006:3702:4aff] has quit [Quit: danrobinson] 14:31 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:31 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:33 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:33 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:34 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:34 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:34 < petertodd> kanzure: ah, I couldn't find the discussion until I searched for "code" 14:35 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:35 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:35 < kanzure> reading is hard :-\ 14:35 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:36 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:37 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:37 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:38 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:38 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:39 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:39 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:40 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:40 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:41 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:42 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:43 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:43 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:45 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:45 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:45 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:46 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:46 -!- danrobinson [~danrobins@2604:2000:e080:d400:51b9:c006:3702:4aff] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:47 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:47 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:47 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:47 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:49 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:49 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] 14:50 -!- MaxSan [~one@185.156.175.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 14:51 < kanzure> colored coin stuff https://github.com/jl2012/bips/blob/color/bip-color.mediawiki 14:52 < petertodd> kanzure: ugh, there's far better tech than that :( 14:56 < betawaffle> petertodd: like? 14:58 < petertodd> betawaffle: well, admittedly, it's not packaged software, but the proofchains model that keeps all that data off the chain 14:58 < petertodd> betawaffle: though, I probably should get off IRC and do some more work on making that happen :P 14:58 < betawaffle> :P 15:02 -!- alferz [~alferz@c-73-151-159-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 15:02 -!- alferz [~alferz@c-73-151-159-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Changing host] 15:02 -!- alferz [~alferz@unaffiliated/alfer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 15:06 -!- rgrant [~rgrant@unaffiliated/rgrant] has left #bitcoin-wizards [] 15:07 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 15:09 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/chrisstewart5/x-62865615] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 15:14 -!- pro [~pro@unaffiliated/pro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 15:25 < gmaxwell> ugh thats yuck 15:27 < gmaxwell> Nitcoin is not an arbitary database for other assets and the security assumptions do not clearly apply (e.g. if you start trading around a hundred million in foo-tokens that don't become worthless if bitcoin is attacked, attacking bitcoin to break foo tokens is not discouraged by the system incentives. 15:28 < gmaxwell> Bitcoin* 15:28 < betawaffle> oh yeah! nitcoin! 15:28 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 15:28 < gmaxwell> and the registration requires additional unprunable data. 15:30 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 15:30 < gmaxwell> (and it burns nsequence bits :-/) 15:31 < gmaxwell> So effectively it proposes making bitcoin perpetually worse in several respects, for the benefit of trading competing assets which may undermine the security assumptions of the system. 15:34 -!- dnaleor [~dnaleor@78-23-74-78.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 15:34 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Client Quit] 15:34 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 15:48 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-68-243.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 15:50 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-84-163.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:00 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-84-163.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Read error: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number] 16:00 -!- daszorz [~daszorz@cpc106809-live29-2-0-cust896.17-2.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 16:01 -!- echonaut [~echonaut@46.101.192.134] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:01 -!- echonaut [~echonaut@46.101.192.134] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:01 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-84-163.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:02 -!- abpa [~abpa@96-82-80-28-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com] 16:08 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@unaffiliated/tiagotrs] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 16:08 -!- Noldorin [~noldorin@unaffiliated/noldorin] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 16:10 < bsm117532> Well, we're going to see it for reals as ERC20 assets compete with ETH 16:10 < gmaxwell> bsm117532: ethereum is far too centeralized to conduct that expirement. 16:11 < gmaxwell> If someone starts saying that miners should accept ERC20 assets instead of eth for fees, then the users of that token have a non-trivial risk that the eth foundation issues another ledger update to confiscate them to protect the value of their ether holdings, or other lesser insanities-- like just announcing that any miner that does is attacking the network and should be avoided. 16:12 < gmaxwell> (as they did when some miners started accepting free txn) 16:13 < bsm117532> This is why multi-asset chains are fundamentally a bad idea. You have a database with IOU's or you have a single asset on your chain. 16:14 < gmaxwell> Yes, that was part of my point. 16:14 < bsm117532> Just reinforcing it... 16:15 < sipa> i think IOU's on a chain are totally fine, but not wion a system that uses PoW 16:15 < gmaxwell> IOUs on a chain sounds like snakes on a plane. 16:15 < sipa> as the security of a PoW based system derives from its ability to pay miners in its native currency 16:15 < bsm117532> sipa well then your "chain" is just a database. PoW is an asset. 16:16 < gmaxwell> Databases are nice. 16:16 < sipa> bsm117532: i disagree, but let's ignore semantivs 16:16 < bsm117532> Databases are nice, and useful. 16:16 < sipa> you could argue it is a distributed database system 16:16 < sipa> but bitcoin's chainstate is also already a database 16:17 < bsm117532> Sure fine, but it has no inherent value proposition, it's just record keeping, not an asset in itself. 16:17 < sipa> the chain never replaces the chain part - but it could replace another consistency mechanism 16:18 < sipa> sure, no need for a native asset in a federated distributed database 16:18 < bsm117532> *sigh* I'm going to have to read this plasma paper... :-/ 16:18 < kanzure> just do the vulcan mind meld thing: reading is only necessary if you do not already know the answers. 16:19 < bsm117532> Well. I respect at least one of the authors. And people are poking me asking me for my opinion. So at least I should give it a fair shot at not knowing the answers in advance. :-P 16:20 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-84-163.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 16:21 < kanzure> i think there's likely to be a fraud proof censoring problem in this one. 16:22 < kanzure> if you assume non-censorship then i think you can get away with much simpler systems 16:23 < kanzure> (i'm just guessing that it's one of their operative assumptions here.) 16:27 -!- LeMiner [~LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 16:28 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:29 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-84-163.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:31 -!- Aaronvan_ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:31 -!- Aaronvan_ [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:35 -!- AaronvanW [~AaronvanW@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 16:40 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/chrisstewart5/x-62865615] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:40 -!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@cpe-70-114-192-114.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:44 -!- blackwraith [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 16:46 -!- blackwraith [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 16:50 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/chrisstewart5/x-62865615] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 17:03 -!- Noldorin [~noldorin@unaffiliated/noldorin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 17:03 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 17:09 -!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@cpe-70-114-192-114.austin.res.rr.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:15 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@pD9FD69C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 17:21 -!- ratbanebo [~ratbanebo@ptr-fyrl7zwsymfet451y6j.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 17:26 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-84-163.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 17:35 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 17:42 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 17:50 -!- alferz [~alferz@unaffiliated/alfer] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 18:04 -!- blackwraith [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 18:15 -!- danrobinson [~danrobins@2604:2000:e080:d400:51b9:c006:3702:4aff] has quit [Quit: danrobinson] 18:19 -!- dnaleor [~dnaleor@78-23-74-78.access.telenet.be] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 18:30 -!- Murch [~murch@96-82-80-28-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Quit: Snoozing.] 18:30 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-84-163.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 18:47 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-84-163.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 18:49 -!- tiagotrs_ [~tiago@p5DC47DF3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 18:52 -!- tiagotrs [~tiago@pD9FD69C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 18:54 -!- tiagotrs_ [~tiago@p5DC47DF3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 19:01 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-69-17.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:01 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-69-17.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 19:02 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-69-17.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:11 -!- LeMiner2 [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:11 -!- prime__ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:14 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-69-17.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 19:17 -!- aj__ [aj@cerulean.erisian.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:17 -!- aj__ [aj@cerulean.erisian.com.au] has quit [Client Quit] 19:18 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:18 -!- arowser_ [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:18 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Client Quit] 19:18 -!- [1]LeMiner [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:18 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- modin [~modin@h-6-164.A444.priv.bahnhof.se] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:18 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has quit [Changing host] 19:18 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:18 -!- prime_ [~quassel@ip-178-203-234-156.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- marcoagner [~user@179.177.245.14] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- LeMiner2 [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- Anduck [~Anduck@unaffiliated/anduck] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- Dyaheon [~Dya@a91-156-192-39.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- Logicwax [~Logicwax@c-76-126-174-152.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- [1]LeMiner [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- kaalia [~remote_us@45.55.206.107] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:18 -!- tuxcanfly [~tuxcanfly@146.185.169.116] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:19 -!- Anduck [~Anduck@unaffiliated/anduck] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:19 -!- Dyaheon [~Dya@a91-156-192-39.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:19 -!- chjj [~chjj@c-73-189-60-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:20 -!- tuxcanfly [~tuxcanfly@146.185.169.116] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:22 -!- Logicwax [~Logicwax@c-76-126-174-152.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:24 -!- TD--Linux [~Thomas@2604:a880:1:20::173:1001] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:24 -!- Anduck_ [~Anduck@unaffiliated/anduck] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:28 -!- kaalia [~remote_us@45.55.206.107] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:28 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:28 -!- Anduck [~Anduck@unaffiliated/anduck] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:28 -!- TD-Linux [~Thomas@about/essy/indecisive/TD-Linux] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:28 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:28 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:28 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has quit [Changing host] 19:28 -!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:28 -!- TD--Linux is now known as TD-Linux 19:28 -!- TD-Linux [~Thomas@2604:a880:1:20::173:1001] has quit [Changing host] 19:28 -!- TD-Linux [~Thomas@about/essy/indecisive/TD-Linux] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:29 -!- Noldorin [~noldorin@unaffiliated/noldorin] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…] 19:31 -!- marcoagner [~user@179.177.245.14] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:39 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-78-113.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:48 -!- pro [~pro@unaffiliated/pro] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 19:58 -!- Belkaar [~Belkaar@unaffiliated/belkaar] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 19:59 -!- Belkaar [~Belkaar@xdsl-85-197-45-51.netcologne.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 19:59 -!- Belkaar [~Belkaar@xdsl-85-197-45-51.netcologne.de] has quit [Changing host] 19:59 -!- Belkaar [~Belkaar@unaffiliated/belkaar] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 20:06 -!- chjj [~chjj@c-73-189-60-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.9] 20:10 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 20:12 < jl2012> kanzure, petertodd, gmaxwell: I didn't intend to propose the colored coin to bitcoin 20:15 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-78-113.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:18 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-78-145.dyn.mobistar.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 20:27 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.9] 20:38 < jl2012> i tried to make colored coin with covenant. But it seems overly complicated when I try to split or combine colored UTXOs 20:42 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 20:50 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 20:53 -!- Chris_Stewart_5 [~chris@unaffiliated/chris-stewart-5/x-3612383] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:55 -!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/emcy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 20:57 -!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/emcy] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 21:00 -!- hkjn0 [~zero@102.84.211.130.bc.googleusercontent.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 21:00 -!- legogris [~legogris@128.199.205.238] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 21:00 -!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@ptr-178-50-78-145.dyn.mobistar.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 21:00 -!- legogris [~legogris@128.199.205.238] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 21:32 -!- marcoagner [~user@179.177.245.14] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] 21:33 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 21:36 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 21:38 -!- [7] [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Disconnected by services] 21:38 -!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 21:40 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Client Quit] 21:41 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 21:43 -!- marcoagner [~user@179.177.246.77] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 21:51 -!- arowser_ [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.] 21:53 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 22:06 -!- ratbanebo [~ratbanebo@ptr-fyrl7zwsymfet451y6j.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be] has quit [] 22:40 -!- alferz [~alferz@unaffiliated/alfer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 22:46 -!- chjj [~chjj@unaffiliated/chjj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 23:01 -!- alferz [~alferz@unaffiliated/alfer] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 23:08 -!- fletom [~fletom@ec2-34-202-234-47.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 23:09 -!- fletom [~fletom@ec2-34-202-234-47.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards 23:43 -!- d_t [~d_t@108-65-78-188.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 23:52 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 23:53 -!- g0d355__ [~lmao@104.131.75.159] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] --- Log closed Fri Aug 11 00:00:46 2017