2015-02-26.log

--- Log opened Thu Feb 26 00:00:05 2015
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:06
-!- coiner [~linker@115.79.55.177] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:06
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Quit: Leaving]00:18
-!- coinheavy [~coinheavy@108-233-255-91.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:19
-!- p15_ [~p15@198.50.160.97.static-ca.cryptolayer.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:21
-!- user7779_ [~user77790@193.138.219.233] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]00:22
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:22
-!- p15 [~p15@182.50.108.74] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]00:23
-!- coiner [~linker@115.79.55.177] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]00:25
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]00:26
-!- coiner [~linker@115.79.55.177] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:28
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]00:28
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:32
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]00:38
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:39
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/erasmospunk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:43
-!- tcrypt [~tylersmit@c-67-169-17-114.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]00:49
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:50
-!- Pan0ram1x [~Pan0ram1x@095-096-084-122.static.chello.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]00:51
-!- SDCDev [~quassel@unaffiliated/sdcdev] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:56
-!- Pan0ram1x [~Pan0ram1x@095-096-084-122.static.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:57
-!- CoinMuncher [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:57
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]01:03
-!- Pan0ram1x [~Pan0ram1x@095-096-084-122.static.chello.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]01:03
-!- andy-logbot [~bitcoin--@wpsoftware.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]01:05
-!- andy-logbot [~bitcoin--@wpsoftware.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:05
* andy-logbot is logging01:05
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:304:cff8:1580:481e:458f:1bb4:fc8a] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]01:08
-!- jtimon [~quassel@c51-71.i07-13.onvol.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:09
-!- Pan0ram1x [~Pan0ram1x@095-096-084-122.static.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:12
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]01:13
-!- dc17523be3 [unknown@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-mbunypqhzcunpcll] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]01:15
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@2a02:8108:73f:f6e4:e23f:49ff:fe47:9364] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:18
-!- luktgf [~vfbtgn@86.126.16.150] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:25
-!- oujh [~vfbtgn@86.121.70.101] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]01:28
-!- p15 [~p15@109.201.137.165] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:29
-!- p15_ [~p15@198.50.160.97.static-ca.cryptolayer.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]01:29
-!- luktgf [~vfbtgn@86.126.16.150] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]01:30
-!- SDCDev [~quassel@unaffiliated/sdcdev] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]01:31
-!- vdo [~vdo@68.Red-2-137-82.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:32
-!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:33
-!- p15 [~p15@109.201.137.165] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]01:34
-!- p15 [~p15@89.248.174.54] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:37
-!- dc17523be3 [unknown@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-floikrhfegdznsdc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:38
-!- luktgf [~vfbtgn@188.25.38.100] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:42
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]01:45
-!- luktgf [~vfbtgn@188.25.38.100] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]01:57
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:03
-!- Mably [56401ec3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.195] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:06
-!- CoinMuncher [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]02:06
-!- CoinMuncher [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:11
-!- luktgf [~vfbtgn@188.25.38.100] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:14
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]02:14
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:19
-!- moa [~moa@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]02:21
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]02:25
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@76-255-129-88.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:37
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:38
-!- embicoin_ [~chatzilla@INTERFIBRA-37-25-40-160.CPEs.villena.interfibra.es] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:41
-!- embicoin [~chatzilla@unaffiliated/embicoin] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]02:43
-!- embicoin_ is now known as embicoin02:43
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]02:46
-!- Mably [56401ec3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.195] has quit [Quit: Page closed]02:52
-!- Mably [56401ec3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.195] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:54
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:55
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]02:56
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@wilkins2.static.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]02:57
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:02
-!- hearn [~mike@205.72.194.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:03
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:05
-!- llllllllll [~lllllllll@6d482698.ftth.concepts.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:07
-!- lmatteis [uid3300@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tpojezqyirxhsytq] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:07
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]03:08
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:11
-!- iugfhvybu [~vfbtgn@188.25.73.93] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:15
-!- luktgf [~vfbtgn@188.25.38.100] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]03:17
-!- wallet421 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:19
-!- wallet421 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has quit [Changing host]03:19
-!- wallet421 [~wallet42@unaffiliated/wallet42] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:19
-!- wallet42 is now known as Guest7104003:19
-!- Guest71040 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has quit [Killed (cameron.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services))]03:19
-!- wallet421 is now known as wallet4203:19
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:20
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Changing host]03:20
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:20
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]03:21
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]03:22
-!- Logicwax [Logicwax@c-50-161-23-192.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]03:23
-!- alferz [~alferz@unaffiliated/alfer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:23
-!- Logicwax [~Logicwax@c-50-161-23-192.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:24
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Read error: Connection timed out]03:24
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:25
-!- Tjopper [~Jop@dhcp-077-249-237-229.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:25
-!- drawingthesun [~drawingth@124-148-83-165.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:26
-!- alferz [~alferz@unaffiliated/alfer] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]03:35
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@unaffiliated/wallet42] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]03:35
-!- drawingthesun [~drawingth@124-148-83-165.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Quit: Leaving]03:38
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:38
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]03:39
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:42
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:51
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has quit [Client Quit]03:51
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:57
-!- p15 [~p15@89.248.174.54] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]04:01
-!- LarsLarsen [~lars@50.161.197.33] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]04:08
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:09
-!- LarsLarsen [~lars@50.161.197.33] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:11
-!- vmatekole [~vmatekole@e179028125.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:13
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]04:13
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]04:14
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:18
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Read error: Connection timed out]04:18
-!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]04:18
-!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:22
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:30
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:39
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-57-70-101.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:40
-!- bobke [~bobke@d1F05F779.access.telenet.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]04:49
-!- coinheavy [~coinheavy@108-233-255-91.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]04:50
-!- coinheavy [~coinheavy@108-233-255-91.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:51
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]04:53
-!- coinheavy [~coinheavy@108-233-255-91.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]04:55
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:58
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@wilkins2.static.monkeybrains.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:02
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]05:03
-!- antgreen [~user@CPE687f74122463-CM84948c2e0610.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]05:04
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]05:19
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:29
-!- SDCDev [~quassel@unaffiliated/sdcdev] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:31
-!- embicoin [~chatzilla@INTERFIBRA-37-25-40-160.CPEs.villena.interfibra.es] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]05:35
-!- coiner [~linker@115.79.55.177] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]05:35
-!- amincd [1710a2c6@gateway/web/freenode/ip.23.16.162.198] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:35
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@wilkins2.static.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]05:37
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:37
-!- user7779078 [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-ebeotfmsgzljnari] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:38
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]05:42
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:42
-!- user7779078 [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-ebeotfmsgzljnari] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]05:45
-!- hearn [~mike@205.72.194.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]05:46
-!- droark [~droark@209-6-53-207.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:50
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]05:54
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:54
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-4d08d5e2.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]05:59
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]06:00
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:04
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.10.99] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]06:05
-!- SDCDev [~quassel@unaffiliated/sdcdev] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]06:11
-!- maraoz [~maraoz@43-161-16-190.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:13
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@86.125.49.61] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]06:21
-!- maaku [~quassel@50-0-37-37.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]06:25
-!- maaku [~quassel@50-0-37-37.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:25
-!- maaku is now known as Guest5856806:25
-!- jps [~Jud@cpe-74-72-116-143.nyc.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:47
-!- mpmcsweeney [~mpmcsween@c-50-189-4-61.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:51
-!- mpmcsweeney [~mpmcsween@c-50-189-4-61.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit [Client Quit]06:51
-!- SDCDev [~quassel@unaffiliated/sdcdev] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:54
-!- coiner [~linker@42.115.151.240] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:58
-!- coiner [~linker@42.115.151.240] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]06:59
-!- coiner [~linker@42.115.151.240] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:59
-!- waxwing [~waxwing@193.138.219.233] has quit [Disconnected by services]07:06
-!- waxwing [waxwing@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-nnamlpggtbmqhsuf] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:06
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]07:07
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:08
-!- SDCDev [~quassel@unaffiliated/sdcdev] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]07:10
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]07:12
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:20
-!- ryanxcharles [~ryan@2601:9:4680:dd0:c991:6ef1:1c38:e752] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]07:20
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:22
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5-12-82-187.residential.rdsnet.ro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:25
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]07:33
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:50
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5-12-82-187.residential.rdsnet.ro] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]07:52
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5-12-82-187.residential.rdsnet.ro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:53
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5-12-82-187.residential.rdsnet.ro] has quit [Client Quit]07:53
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5-12-82-187.residential.rdsnet.ro] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:58
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:58
-!- xenog [~xeno@95.83.254.107] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:19
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5-12-82-187.residential.rdsnet.ro] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]08:20
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]08:20
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.10.158] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:23
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]08:25
-!- xenog [~xeno@95.83.254.107] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]08:26
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:26
-!- xenog [~xeno@95.83.254.107] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:28
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@wilkins2.static.monkeybrains.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:29
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]08:31
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has quit [Quit: Quit]08:32
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:34
-!- devrandom [~devrandom@unaffiliated/niftyzero1] has quit [Quit: leaving]08:35
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]08:36
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:37
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Changing host]08:37
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:37
-!- Amerlin [~Duqu@65.206.95.146] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:37
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@wilkins2.static.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]08:41
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:42
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]08:45
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:46
-!- zooko [~user@c-75-70-204-109.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:47
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@95.76.156.247] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:01
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Read error: Connection timed out]09:02
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:02
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-57-70-101.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]09:03
-!- ryanxcharles [~ryan@64.124.157.148] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:03
-!- vdo [~vdo@68.Red-2-137-82.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]09:03
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:04
-!- xenog [~xeno@95.83.254.107] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]09:05
-!- p15 [~p15@114.244.159.132] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:06
-!- dabura667 [uid43070@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-leccnzhsqtmkjrlw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:14
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:19
-!- PFate [sid33238@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vzxzlepwpmvkxprh] has left #bitcoin-wizards []09:22
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:23
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]09:24
-!- user7779_ [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-mlapxnlolvkymmdb] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:24
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]09:27
-!- Mably [56401ec3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.195] has quit [Quit: Page closed]09:28
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]09:31
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has quit [Quit: Quit]09:32
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]09:33
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:33
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Changing host]09:33
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:33
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Read error: Connection timed out]09:35
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:36
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]09:41
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:41
-!- adam3us [~Adium@88-105-16-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]09:42
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]09:45
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:45
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:46
-!- CoinMuncher [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]09:50
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@95.76.156.247] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]09:54
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]09:55
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:57
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:58
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:05
-!- p15 [~p15@114.244.159.132] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]10:06
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]10:08
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:08
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:12
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]10:13
-!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:18
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:18
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has quit [Client Quit]10:18
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:19
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has quit [Quit: Quit]10:21
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has quit [Client Quit]10:21
-!- AlienProject [~Alien_Pro@72.53.101.165] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:22
-!- irc88 [~irc88@204.28.117.162] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:29
-!- Guest58568 is now known as maaku10:31
-!- irc88 [~irc88@204.28.117.162] has quit [Client Quit]10:32
-!- hktud0 [wq@unaffiliated/fluffybunny] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]10:32
-!- irc88 [~irc88@204.28.117.162] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:34
-!- tcrypt [~tylersmit@173.247.206.110] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:35
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:36
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has quit [Client Quit]10:36
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:37
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@5ec33c2d.skybroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:38
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@5ec33c2d.skybroadband.com] has quit [Changing host]10:38
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:38
-!- andytoshi [~andytoshi@unaffiliated/andytoshi] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]10:41
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:45
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:46
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]10:48
-!- bramc [~bram@99-75-88-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:55
-!- andytoshi [~andytoshi@wpsoftware.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:55
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]10:59
-!- Starduster [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]11:00
-!- HaltingState [~HaltingSt@unaffiliated/haltingstate] has quit [Quit: Leaving]11:03
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:03
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:06
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:07
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]11:09
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:09
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:10
-!- iugfhvybu [~vfbtgn@188.25.73.93] has quit [Quit: Leaving]11:10
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:16
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:16
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]11:21
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has quit [Quit: Quit]11:24
-!- Amerlin [~Duqu@65.206.95.146] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]11:24
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:26
bramcThe bitcoin foundation is sounding an awful lot like the FSF or the xcode foundation11:28
-!- cryptowest [~cryptowes@191.101.1.104] has quit [Excess Flood]11:29
-!- cryptowest [~cryptowes@191.101.1.104] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:32
bramcAs in, organizations which their intended recipients might be better off without.11:33
-!- AlienProject [~Alien_Pro@72.53.101.165] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:35
-!- AlienProject [~Alien_Pro@72.53.101.165] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:35
Luke-Jrbramc: eh, FSF does good work?11:36
-!- Amerlin [~Duqu@64.49.65.11] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:36
bramcLuke-Jr, I don't know if they've turned around in the last 10 years, but at one point they stopped funding software because nobody wanted their money any more because they were impossible to deal with. Also the GPLv3 thing is... misguided.11:36
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]11:36
Luke-Jrbramc: I don't see why people hate the GPLv3. it seems good to me.11:37
Luke-Jrclarifies some important matters people confused in the GPLv2 and addresses patent abuse problems11:37
bramcLuke-Jr, The short of it is that in practice it's way too much of a poison pill. Although that subject is rather off topic for here. In practice the gplv2 is a horrible poison pill as well, and so is the lgpl if you actually read the fine print and try to be compliant11:38
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:38
* Luke-Jr has had no issues with the AGPLv3 for Eloipool.11:39
Luke-Jrit's often a necessary "poison pill" as long as others don't play nice.11:39
bramcThe gplv3 in practice achieves nothing because it's such a poison pill that nobody uses it11:40
Luke-Jr(lots of people do)11:40
Luke-JrGPLv3 recently came in handy when Google/Nest decided to claim the GPLv2 doesn't apply to their "smart" thermostats11:41
bramcLet me clarify: I don't think I've ever heard of a single time when a business used gplv3 software. And most of them won't touch gplv2 except for certain very specific cases like linux and python (which is dual licensed anyway)11:41
-!- Starduster [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:42
bramcBut my original point was about the bitcoin foundation, and from what I'm reading now the comparison is unfair to the fsf, because they may be unpleasant and misguided, but they aren't overtly criminal and grotesguely incompetent.11:43
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:44
Luke-Jrbramc: community is more important than businesses who hate free software. I probably wouldn't buy their products anyway. Nest used GPLv3 monit, so I was able to get source out of them using it, and I am pleased with that result.11:44
Luke-Jryes, we can get back to BCF :p11:44
bramcMost big free software projects have most of their development done by people who are paid to do so as part of their jobs. Businesses are happy to participate in the community if you let them.11:45
-!- fanquake_ [~anonymous@unaffiliated/fanquake] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:46
-!- dabura667 [uid43070@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-leccnzhsqtmkjrlw] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]11:46
bramcgmaxwell, The bug in timsort only applies to extremely large arrays11:47
-!- fanquake [~anonymous@unaffiliated/fanquake] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]11:47
-!- fanquake_ is now known as fanquake11:47
bramcThe people who did the work on it figured out a patch which doesn't produce a measurable degredation in performance and *has a proof of correctness*. The Java people looked at the bug report, rejected the patch and did their own fix which does measurably reduce performance and doesn't have a proof of correctness11:48
bramc*headdesk*11:48
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]11:48
-!- lmatteis [uid3300@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tpojezqyirxhsytq] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]11:50
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]11:52
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:59
-!- Amerlin [~Duqu@64.49.65.11] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]11:59
-!- Amerlin [~Duqu@64.49.65.11] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:00
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:01
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:03
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]12:04
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]12:14
-!- orik [~orik@50.34.199.60] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:15
-!- EasyAt [~EasyAt@unaffiliated/easyat] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:20
bramcI'm reading through stuff on microchannels and have some really basic questions12:26
kanzurespeak12:27
bramcIt seems like the basic concept is that there's a 'channel', which is where I pledge a certain amount of coin which I might want to transfer to a certain counterparty at some time in the future, and then I sort of piecemeal send it to them securely over time12:27
kanzureyou give them a transaction that you will later replace12:27
bramcSo the first question is, is that correct? And the second question is, if this is done by  cancelling out old transactions, how are the old ones rendered obsolete?12:28
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:28
kanzurei don't know the exact details but if i assume there are no details then the simple answer is never send them a transaction that doesn't spend the original inputs.12:29
kanzureif you want to cancel the transaction another way is to spend those inputs to yourself separately (thus invalidating the transaction you gave them) (the transaction you gave them was not going to be accepted by the network immediately because of some feature i forget the name of)12:30
kanzureprobably nLockTime12:30
Luke-Jrbramc: the older ones have a later nLockTime12:30
kanzurecool, "from first principles" wins again. who needs to know things?12:30
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]12:31
-!- AlienProject [~Alien_Pro@72.53.101.165] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]12:33
kanzurebramc: imagine a restricted example where the user only has one input. spending the input in the first transaction might pay out only 1% of the amount, and 99% goes back to the spender as change. a second transaction with a smaller nLockTime would still have to spend the same inputs, so the original transaction would be invalid by the time it became possible to submit it and get it accepted on the network. of course, they are welcome ...12:33
kanzure... to spend that first one rather than the later ones, but then they just earn less money. (again my example was restricted with a single input)12:33
bramcActually this might all be a silly question, I can give you a transaction handing over a larger amount of my original coin, which I'm not able to deposit because you need to sign it as well12:33
bramckanzure, so why get nlocktime involved at all? It seems like that's mostly necessary for a refund in the initial coin setup12:34
bramcThe main problem seems to be that this requires a huge amount of working capital, and that original nlocktime needs to be far in the future for there to be real performance, which also sucks if my counterparty wanders off because I have to wait to get my coin back12:36
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:37
bramcBasically I'm depositing coin in a bank and the bank is doing transfers with other banks. It should be possible to set up a collaborative simultaneous transfer so that I can securely transfer coin with somebody else who's also using a bank12:37
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-29-101.dyn.columbia.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:37
bramcWhich sounds like a complicated and technical transaction but should be totally doable, I'm trying to figure out the high level things right now.12:38
kanzurewhoops yes i forgot about the signed refund transaction12:38
bramcFrom some stuff at the talk the other day I think he doesn't actually have that simultaneous transfer integration stuff worked out. Maybe I should do that.12:39
bramcBut this working capital stuff seems like a serious limitation. Everybody needs at some point to take a pile of real money and exchange it for a pile of coin12:41
-!- belcher_ [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:42
bramcAnd that needs to have at least one transaction hit the block chain12:42
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]12:42
kanzure"working capital limitations" is one reason one might want to have not all of their capital in a single utxo12:42
bramckanzure, Not sure what point you're making12:44
bramcMy point is that if I intend to spend $X over the next year, and only incur one set of transaction fees, I need to go plop down $X right now12:45
kanzurewhy is it a year-long thing?12:46
kanzureiirc people have said for a while now that channels are best used for more real-timey services12:46
bramcI can do a shorter time period, but then that incurs more real transactions on the block chain12:46
bramcThere's also something about a new opcode to incur fewer real transactions, something about locking by time since deposited. I have no idea what that's about.12:47
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]12:48
bramcIt seems like it should work for real time stuff, at least in terms of being better than green address, assuming the whole four-way transaction with two counterparties and two banks is worked out.12:49
-!- belcher_ is now known as belcher12:50
kanzurei've been having trouble lately regarding arguments about how many transactions should be on the blockchain or not12:53
kanzuretell me how to decide what the correct amount of transactions for a healthy civilization is. one billion per second? one trillion per second?12:53
maakukanzure: whatever can be supported without compromising the decentralized nature of the block chain12:53
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]12:54
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:54
kanzuremaaku: sure. i just use that rant to go into "batched settlement is good".12:54
bramcThe annoying thing is that if I have a transfer going to and from you and we hit the amount pledged on both sides then we have to make another whole new transaction with new pledges to cancel out the old one. Maybe there's something in the microchannel stuff about using nlocktime to do exactly that.12:54
Luke-Jrmaaku: well, no need for that if we can do fine with less either :p12:54
bramckanzure, microchannels are batched settlement, correct? Just secure batched settlement, instead of 'we trust the bank' batched settlement.12:55
Luke-JrI'd say as few as possible without compromising security in significant ways is ideal.12:55
kanzurewell, maybe... i will have to think more about that. batching, in my head, just means taking lots of transactions and simplifying the inputs and outputs to make the overall set smaller.12:56
bramckanzure, I'm envisioning microchannels as just a way of having secure banks. Maybe this isn't what other people are thinking. I'm pretty sure the talk the other day didn't cover that, which means that a designing a 50-message protocol is likely in my near future.12:57
kanzurejust use ISO 20022 or something else that already exists12:57
bramcFor transaction rate, let's say that the population of earth is 10 billion people and each does 100 transactions per day, that's a trillion transactions per day, or about 10 million transactions per second12:59
Luke-Jrbramc: did you by chance get to go to Joseph's presentation on Monday?12:59
bramcThat's probably high by two orders of magnitude, a 'reasonable' goal is 100 thousand transactions per second12:59
bramcLuke-Jr, yes but I was a few minutes late and it seemed it was impossible to follow all the technical details from the presentation12:59
Luke-Jr>_<12:59
bramcIt wasn't organized very well, a high level of what the protocol accomplishes with no technical machinery would have been much more helpful.13:00
bramcI *might* be sent a draft of the paper later today.13:00
-!- Amerlin [~Duqu@64.49.65.11] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]13:01
* Luke-Jr wonders when he plans to publish his paper13:01
bramcHe said the paper was going online the next day, but google isn't helping me13:01
-!- Duqu [~Duqu@64.49.65.11] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:01
bramcHe also said the paper isn't very clear yet.13:01
kanzurei'm not sure that the blockchain needs to handle all transactions in civilization anyway13:02
kanzureand consider all closed book transactions, such as random ledgers from random video games13:02
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:03
bramcI'm *guessing* that a channel is something along the lines of we each pledge an $X coin to each other, and start handing over bits of it over time, every time somebody transfers money to me you give me some of your pledged one, every time I spend some I give you some of my pledged one, and when both are completely spent we obliterate them by making a new pair with a shorter nlocktime13:04
bramcBut the work to integrate the transfers with simultaneous transfer seems to be not done yet.13:05
bramcSo technical issues, which I believe are, ahem, interesting but entirely doable, the big questions come down to working capital.13:07
bramcLike, I don't imagine a bank would be terribly eager to plop down $X of bitcoin just so I can start transacting, even if I do the same.13:08
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-29-101.dyn.columbia.edu] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:09
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-29-101.dyn.columbia.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:09
-!- zwischenzug [~zwischenz@pool-108-51-197-41.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:10
-!- embicoin [~chatzilla@INTERFIBRA-37-25-40-160.CPEs.villena.interfibra.es] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:11
-!- embicoin [~chatzilla@INTERFIBRA-37-25-40-160.CPEs.villena.interfibra.es] has quit [Changing host]13:12
-!- embicoin [~chatzilla@unaffiliated/embicoin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:12
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-29-101.dyn.columbia.edu] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]13:14
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]13:14
kanzurebramc: have you read https://bitcoinj.github.io/working-with-micropayments13:14
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:14
kanzureand https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts#Example_7:_Rapidly-adjusted_.28micro.29payments_to_a_pre-determined_party13:14
bramckanzure, was just reading that first one, will look at the second one13:16
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]13:19
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:19
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]13:19
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:22
-!- Duqu [~Duqu@64.49.65.11] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]13:24
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:25
Taekbramc: They are called micropayment channels because they're more useful for small many small payments that sum to a still-small payment.13:27
TaekWhen you create one, you're locking up some volume of coins which you can *only* send to the receiver for X time13:28
TaekSo generally you wouldn't want to do it with something as serious as banking, because if the bank decides to enforce 10% fees or whatever, you're basically stuck waiting until the refund expires.13:29
bramcGoing by my own laws of physics calculation, which in this case are really laws of arithmetic, if I want to set up an account with a bank the capital requirements should be that I have to plop down the maximum amount I might go into the hole in the future before my transactions start getting rejected up front, which involves a real transaction on the block chain. Thereafter if people transfer me coin or I send coin it se13:29
bramcems like it should be possible to not have any transactions on the block chain until my net balance goes below zero or above my initial deposit13:29
bramcSo I can get, say, my paycheck sent, which makes something new on the blockchain, and thereafter work with an untrusted bank13:30
TaekYes, but you're forced to work with your bank. Any time you send money to someone, you'll have to get a signature from your bank13:31
bramcTaek, Yes that's the other issue is that an attacker can force you to wait out the refund time13:31
TaekSuch an attack isn't a big deal if it's like $80 and you're waiting 30 days13:31
TaekIt's a bigger problem if it's 6 months of income and you're waiting a whole year13:32
bramcEven if it's a whole paycheck a month or two might not be so bad13:32
bramcCompared to how poor people get their paychecks stolen from them in overdraft fees that sort of downside scenario is no big deal13:32
Taek^ not so bad for software devs. A huge many people live paycheck to paycheck though13:32
TaekThe bank would instead just bully them, knowing it has all their money, and enforce a 10% spending fee13:33
bramcAlso, banks don't generally disappear and force you to wait a bit to get your money out all that often. They steal hundreds of dollars using overdraft fees and similar bullshit fees all the time13:33
Taekthey have no choice b/c they need to eat13:33
bramcSuch behavior would cause a severe hit to the bank's reputation13:33
TaekYou'd imagine that BS overdraft fees would do the same13:34
bramcoverdraft fees can be hidden in the fine print, with a cryptocurrency you're actually defended13:34
bramcBut this is all besides my point, I'm talking about the theoretical limits of deposit requirements, which you haven't actually disagreed with so far13:35
bramcThe work done so far seems to assume that the bank will make a backwards deposit when you make your  forwards deposit, which to me falls into the category of Things Which Will Not Happen13:36
bramcAlso I'm trying to do better than micropayment support, into blockchain scaling, which is what the presentation the other day was about.13:36
TaekA bank would do it if the deposit backwards had some sort of interest rate attatched to it13:36
bramcI think the backwards deposit is a technical problem which should have a purely technical solution.13:37
TaekI think the theoretical limit of micropayment channels is 1 transaction on the blockchain per party per cycle of coins.13:37
bramcI think it's possible to reduce the blockchain transaction to 1 transaction (or some small constant factor on top of that) on the blockchain per return timeout period13:38
Taekeven if you spend more than the initial balance/13:38
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:38
Taek*?13:38
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]13:38
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:39
bramcNo, you can't spend more than the initial deposit or have sent to you to get a balance greater than the initial deposit without incurring a new blockchain transaction13:39
bramcAlthough there might be a loophole on that second one13:39
-!- iddo [~idddo@unaffiliated/iddo] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]13:41
bramcThis still doesn't get anywhere near global scalability, but at least it gets a bunch more orders of magnitude13:41
-!- iddo [~idddo@csm.cs.technion.ac.il] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:42
Taekhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=918018.013:42
TaekThere's also a mailing list thread but I'm not sure how to link to that13:42
TaekI don't fully understand how/if it works13:43
bramcIf you assume that there's a billion people using the system and they do one transaction per month, that's about 400 transactions per second, still not feasible13:43
kanzuresourceforge has a web interface to their mailing lists but i hvaen't figured out how to predict the urls13:43
-!- devrandom [~devrandom@unaffiliated/niftyzero1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:43
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@chello084114181075.1.15.vie.surfer.at] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:46
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@chello084114181075.1.15.vie.surfer.at] has quit [Changing host]13:46
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:46
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:48
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]13:48
Taek400 tps only gets you 1 billion per month? I never made that connection before13:48
bramcYeah a billion is a lot13:50
-!- Tjopper [~Jop@dhcp-077-249-237-229.chello.nl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]13:52
Taekhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Velocity_of_M1_Money_Stock_in_the_US.png13:53
bramcIs that then number of times each dollar in circulation is spent per year?13:54
Taekyes13:54
Taekeven if you could push it out to 1 transaction per year, people tend to spend money faster than that13:54
kanzurei've been meaning to try to estimate the maximum "trouble" that counterfeitable bills will be in due to exposure to scarce assets like bitcoin13:55
kanzureor er, not maximum, just some approximation13:56
Taekas in, how much value will the US dollar lose if Bitcoin hits a  $1 trillion market cap?13:56
kanzurenope13:56
kanzurecounterfeit bills exist because there's no proofs13:56
-!- oujh [~vfbtgn@86.126.1.24] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:57
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-213-73.dyn.columbia.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:58
-!- Duqu [~Duqu@65.206.95.146] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:59
bramcTaek, the multiplier can be handled, in principle, by net settlement through intermediaries, which 'micropayment channels' can in principle do, at least I think they can. Calling them 'micropayment channels' is a misnomer at that point of course, they're really off-blockchain net settlement channels14:00
bramcTaek, the US dollar is in no danger from bitcoin14:01
bramcBut banks could be in trouble if basic banking functions could be done at lower cost14:01
TaekI was just trying to figure out what kanzure meant by 'counterfeitable bills in trouble'14:03
bramcI think he was being sarcastic, but not sure what the point was14:03
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:03
kanzureuh, no particular point, just something i've been meaning to do/estimate14:04
kanzuresome amount of successful counterfeiting seems to occur, so in the presence of a scarce asset i wonder if that becomes more or less important14:05
-!- moa [~moa@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:05
kanzurethat's all. no particular points.14:05
bramcAs long as you can use counterfeit money to get dollars, it will still be valuable14:07
-!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]14:07
bramcThe most successful counterfeiting it's claimed comes from north korea14:07
kanzureright but dosn't that eventually warp supply14:08
kanzure*doesn't14:08
bramcBy the way, those yellow markers for checking if bills are counterfeit totally work14:08
-!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:08
nubbins`imagine14:09
nubbins`the something constellation14:09
bramccounterfeit bills tend to get taken out of circulation over time, and can only be done at scale big enough to matter if you have a lot of resources but pathetically little money. Hence north korea14:09
kanzuredo you happen to know what that scale happens to be roughly?14:09
kanzure$100B/mo? $1T/mo? or is that not noticeable?14:10
-!- adlai [~Adlai@unaffiliated/adlai] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]14:10
-!- oujh [~vfbtgn@86.126.1.24] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]14:11
-!- adlai [~Adlai@unaffiliated/adlai] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:12
nubbins`ostensibly low enough that the two countries who actually do commerce with NK wouldn't notice/care14:12
-!- devrandom [~devrandom@unaffiliated/niftyzero1] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]14:12
bramckanzure, the GDP of north korea is about $1 billion/month (holy shit is that low) so if we assume that 1% of it is from counterfeiting that's about $10 million/month14:13
kanzureah, and $10M/mo is nothing compared to global supply14:13
kanzurealright14:13
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-213-73.dyn.columbia.edu] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:13
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-213-73.dyn.columbia.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:14
Taekbramc: I don't understand how the multiplier can be managed by 'net settlement intermediaries' without invoking trust for the lower sums of money14:14
TaekIf Alice spends about $100/mo and can only float about $100, she's going to need a new transaction every month?14:15
TaekI guess if her employer's got a channel open that's ready to pay her 1yr in a advance, the bank can talk to the employer14:16
bramcTaek, Oh I see what you're saying. It's probably the case that individual consumers only put 1x on the ratio and the rest is between vendors14:16
-!- user7779_ [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-mlapxnlolvkymmdb] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:17
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:18
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-213-73.dyn.columbia.edu] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]14:18
TaekThis is where my economics fall apart, but wouldn't it be the case that people with less floating cash contribute to the multiplier at a higher rate than people with lots of savings?14:18
TaekI think it's more or less a ratio of 'throughput vs savings'14:19
-!- devrandom [~devrandom@unaffiliated/niftyzero1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:19
Taek(don't hold me accountable to that I'm not actually sure)14:19
bramcTaek, It isn't clear what the practical implications of the ratio are because theres so much 'near money' and it isn't clear what boundaries should be used14:20
bramcI don't remember if the ratio going up is supposed to make the value of money go up or down14:21
-!- arubi__ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:21
-!- arubi__ is now known as arubi_14:21
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Disconnected by services]14:22
-!- arubi_ is now known as arubi14:22
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]14:22
-!- oujh [~vfbtgn@86.126.1.24] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:23
-!- jps [~Jud@cpe-74-72-116-143.nyc.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: jps]14:25
bramcIt does seem like a period of a month is about right, and most accounts are going to be one way or the other. Of course that highlights the other problem which is that hardly any commerce is kept within bitcoin today so trying to use net settlement is a little silly14:25
bramcSo the whole thing is somewhat aspirational14:25
Taeksilly today but it might not be that unreasonable in 5 years14:26
Taekthe best think that I can think of for paying Alice w/o adding a txn to the blockchain is creating a payment that's greater than what Alice owns14:26
bramcIt may be possible to increase alice's refund, or do something about reducing the refund time.14:27
bramcI'll need to stew on it more.14:27
bramcAlso get a copy of that damn paper and read it.14:27
Taekbi-directional payment channels would fix this issue14:28
bramcBut bi-directional channels require capital deposits on both sides.14:28
bramcOr maybe a payment to alice could be used as the bank's deposit, or something.14:29
Taekpresumably, the size of the channel only limits the maximum possible net flow14:30
TaekWhich I guess is still a problem for people looking to save for retirement or something14:31
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:32
bramcIt only limits the flow for the one time period until the refund option, but the capital requirements for a bank to potentially transfer to a depositor are a real problem.14:32
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:35
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:36
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]14:36
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:37
TaekThe other problem is centralization. By making these channels you're necessarily reducing the number of parties you can send coins to.14:39
TaekWhich hurts decentralization14:40
-!- devrandom [~devrandom@unaffiliated/niftyzero1] has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]14:48
-!- vmatekole [~vmatekole@e179028125.adsl.alicedsl.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:51
-!- jps [~Jud@cpe-74-72-116-143.nyc.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:52
gmaxwellTaek: only if the hub cheats you.14:54
gmaxwell(otherwise you just ask it to release some of the funds to whatever destination you want)14:55
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:55
-!- moa [~moa@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]14:56
Taeknot so bad if the hub is small, but more of a problem if you've got 1 hub controlling 30% of the bitcoin. If hubs become commonplace, I think they'll suffer similar centralization problems to mining14:57
Taekalso not a problem if you only use hubs for micropayments14:57
gmaxwellI'm not sure why you believe that, because the design is trustless and payments can cross hubs transitively, you should expect there to be a large number of them.14:57
TaekHubs take computational resources, they're signing and verifying one signature per transaction, and doing a small volume of network traffic14:58
TaekInconsequential if you're using hubs to buy coffee, but more of a problem if you're making a payment every time you visit a new page on a website14:59
gmaxwellI think you're not thinking that through. ... it's not like having hundreds of thousands of computers do the same thing is an improvement there over one.14:59
gmaxwell$random_desktop_cpu can do >50k signature verifications per second these days.15:00
Taekhmm15:00
Taekoh. The other problem is that hubs need connections to vendors, or some network of connections to vendors15:01
TaekIt's not really reasonable to expect a vendor to set up channels with 2000 different hubs. Instead they're likely to set up connections with the biggest N and call it a day15:03
TaekI guess you could make something like a DHT of hubs.15:05
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]15:08
TaekSo if you have a DHT of hubs, and on average reaching a vendor takes 7 hops, each hub taking X%15:10
Taekyou've got room for mega-hub to offer speed savings15:10
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:11
Taekplus, mega-hub might have a nicer, simpler way for websites to add support for mega-hub, while DHT support might involve more elbow grease15:11
TaekI guess I'm grabbing at straws15:12
bramcgmaxwell, I think it's possible to do unlinked transactions across hubs so you don't have to trust them15:15
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:21
-!- user7779_ [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-ptnwxiojjkvemsuv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:22
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has quit [Quit: Quit]15:23
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:23
-!- user7779078 [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]15:25
-!- PRab [~chatzilla@c-98-209-175-213.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:29
-!- moa [~moa@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:29
bramcI'm pretty sure that you can't get around the problem of a hub having to pledge to send. About the best you can get is that they can require that as much or more be pledged to them at the same time. And of course they can charge a fee.15:30
moagmaxwell: https://github.com/utxo/wheels/wiki payment channels projects links15:32
instagibbsany extra info on Strawpay? claims to be hub model, not much there15:37
moano, they said source code is "coming soon"15:38
moaiirc15:38
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:39
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]15:39
-!- AlienProject [~Alien_Pro@72.53.101.165] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:40
instagibbsthis and actual Coinshuffle implementations are the 2 things sorely needed imo.15:41
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:41
-!- AlienProject [~Alien_Pro@72.53.101.165] has quit [Client Quit]15:43
moaseems there should be market demand for a well-implemented payments channel ...15:43
-!- AlienProject [~Alien_Pro@72.53.101.165] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:43
moaGreenaddress has some elements but not a full implementation15:44
instagibbsGA.it is essentially what Impulse is, heh15:45
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@81.196.160.52] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:47
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Quit: Leaving]15:49
-!- jtimon [~quassel@c51-71.i07-13.onvol.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]15:58
-!- jtimon [~quassel@wilkins2.static.monkeybrains.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:59
-!- user7779_ [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-ptnwxiojjkvemsuv] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:59
bramcmoa, it isn't clear that there's much meaningful bitcoin commerce going on, hence the lack of demand for better bitcoin payment services15:59
moachicken and egg?16:00
moaalso 'much' is a comaprative term16:01
moas/comparative16:01
instagibbsit's chicken/egg + tragedy of commons.16:01
moathere is much more than there used to be16:02
moaand much more than before that16:02
-!- bramc [~bram@99-75-88-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]16:08
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]16:10
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:10
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:16
-!- jps [~Jud@cpe-74-72-116-143.nyc.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: jps]16:16
Luke-Jrthere's enough that I'm caught off-guard when someone says they don't take bitcoin :p16:16
moaLuke-Jr: do you take bitcoin?16:18
instagibbsNo he only mines for Ether16:18
-!- droark [~droark@209-6-53-207.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: ZZZzzz…]16:18
Luke-Jrinstagibbs: couldn't have put it better myself16:19
-!- andytoshi [~andytoshi@wpsoftware.net] has quit [Changing host]16:21
-!- andytoshi [~andytoshi@unaffiliated/andytoshi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:21
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:23
-!- jps [~Jud@cpe-74-72-116-143.nyc.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:24
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]16:26
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:26
-!- Taek [~quassel@2001:41d0:1:472e::] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]16:29
-!- binaryatrocity [~atr0phy.n@2607:fcd0:100:c21:216:3cff:fe68:30d9] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]16:29
-!- Taek [~quassel@2001:41d0:1:472e::] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:29
-!- binaryatrocity [~atr0phy.n@2607:fcd0:100:c21:216:3cff:fe68:30d9] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:29
-!- comboy [~quassel@tesuji.pl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:29
-!- nsh [~lol@wikipedia/nsh] has quit [Excess Flood]16:30
-!- nsh [~lol@wikipedia/nsh] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:30
-!- jps [~Jud@cpe-74-72-116-143.nyc.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: jps]16:31
-!- comboy [~quassel@tesuji.pl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:31
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/erasmospunk] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:32
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:46
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving]16:49
-!- afk11 [~thomas@89.100.72.184] has quit [Read error: No route to host]16:56
-!- gonedrk [~gonedrk@d40a6497.rev.stofanet.dk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:57
-!- AlienProject [~Alien_Pro@72.53.101.165] has quit [Quit: Leaving]17:00
-!- xenog [~xeno@46.7.118.40] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]17:01
-!- hashtagg_ [~hashtag@69.23.213.3] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:09
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@CPE-69-23-213-3.wi.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]17:12
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:17
-!- user7779078 [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-japzmffneynferrr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:18
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@76-255-129-88.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]17:24
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]17:25
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-198-85.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]17:26
-!- xabbix [~xabbix@unaffiliated/xabbix] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]17:28
-!- xabbix [~xabbix@unaffiliated/xabbix] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:29
-!- orik [~orik@50.34.199.60] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]17:32
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]17:36
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:36
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-180-192-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:38
-!- hashtagg_ [~hashtag@69.23.213.3] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]17:40
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-180-192-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]17:42
-!- ryanxcharles [~ryan@64.124.157.148] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]17:54
-!- zooko [~user@c-75-70-204-109.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]17:57
-!- jtimon [~quassel@wilkins2.static.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]17:57
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@2605:6000:1018:c04a:a173:13c3:ef60:78ba] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:57
-!- p15 [~p15@114.244.159.132] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:00
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]18:01
-!- Duqu [~Duqu@65.206.95.146] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]18:02
-!- starsoccer [~starsocce@ns372404.ip-94-23-252.eu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:02
-!- starsoccer is now known as Guest8678918:03
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]18:03
-!- Dr-G3 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:04
-!- zooko [~user@c-75-70-204-109.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:06
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:09
-!- bramc [~bram@99-75-88-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:11
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@dslb-092-076-006-250.092.076.pools.vodafone-ip.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:20
-!- d1ggy [~d1ggy@dslb-092-077-207-199.092.077.pools.vodafone-ip.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]18:24
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:32
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:35
-!- llllllllll [~lllllllll@6d482698.ftth.concepts.nl] has quit []18:35
-!- wizkid057 [wk@unaffiliated/wizkid057] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]18:41
-!- coiner [~linker@42.115.151.240] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]18:41
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has quit [Quit: Quit]18:55
-!- zwischenzug [~zwischenz@pool-108-51-197-41.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:07
-!- tcrypt [~tylersmit@173.247.206.110] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]19:08
-!- OneNomos [~OneNomos@pool-71-163-227-3.washdc.east.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:09
-!- coiner [~linker@115.79.55.177] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:11
-!- wizkid057 [wk@unaffiliated/wizkid057] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:12
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:23
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@81.196.160.52] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]19:23
-!- instagibbs [60ff5d39@gateway/web/freenode/ip.96.255.93.57] has quit [Quit: Page closed]19:25
-!- OneFixt [~OneFixt@unaffiliated/onefixt] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:28
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-29-101.dyn.columbia.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:29
-!- cbeams [~cbeams@unaffiliated/cbeams] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]19:30
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]19:32
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@2605:6000:1018:c04a:a173:13c3:ef60:78ba] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:35
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:35
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]19:37
bramcMy novel proofs of work ideas can be applied to proofs of steak but they don't really work because for each block the challenge has to be met by a piece of stake, and if stake is transferable then it isn't canonical and can be ground on19:40
bramcTime to switch to proofs of lamb chop19:40
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@2605:6000:1018:c04a:7db2:1af7:8c50:bfaf] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:40
bramcBlueMatt, amiller's paper explaining nonoutsourcability is at http://cs.umd.edu/~amiller/nonoutsourceable.pdf19:41
bramcreally it should be called outsourcing resistance. Outsourcing can still be done, it relies on the ratio between the cost of storage and the cost of bandwidth for it to be impractical.19:41
BlueMattmmm19:41
bramcBlueMatt, also the permacoin paper fills in some concrete numbers http://cs.umd.edu/~amiller/permacoin.pdf19:42
BlueMattmmm, i do think i read that one...mustve not had it swapped in at the time19:43
bramcThe nonoutsourcing is rather tangential to the permacoin paper19:43
bramcI really should do a blog post on some of my signature and work stuff19:46
amilleri have a new nonoutosurceable paper now, its a little better19:47
-!- maraoz [~maraoz@43-161-16-190.fibertel.com.ar] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]19:51
-!- koeppelmann [~koeppelma@dyn-160-39-29-101.dyn.columbia.edu] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:56
-!- Dr-G3 is now known as willybot19:59
moaproof of slaughter should be good across multiple meaty chains19:59
-!- tcrypt [~tylersmit@c-67-169-17-114.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:10
-!- willybot [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]20:15
-!- willybot [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:15
-!- willybot is now known as Dr-G20:17
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:29
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]20:32
-!- p15_ [~p15@124.64.96.201] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:34
-!- p15 [~p15@114.244.159.132] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]20:35
-!- orik [~orik@50-46-132-219.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:37
-!- CodeShark [~textual@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:39
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]20:54
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:54
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Disconnected by services]20:56
-!- [7] [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:56
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:56
bramcHuh, I didn't know about the factor of four rule21:01
bramcNot sure if I think that's a good idea21:01
gmaxwellin retargeting? Hm. Pretty sure I mentioned it before, must have been confusing.21:01
gmaxwellIt closes off some pretty straight forward attacks, and has never been hit (nor seems to be likely to be hit) on the production network. Even with that, it still as quartic convergence, which is quite fast.21:02
bramcIntuitively it seems reassuring, but I don't see a strong argument for it being necessary21:02
bramcYou mean logarithmic time convergence21:03
bramcIt's entirely possible somebody explained it to me and I missed it21:03
gmaxwellGo compute the cost for creating a fantasy network for a peer you've temporarily isolated. (esp if you can keep it isolated for weeks). It also makes the variance attack where you intentionally ramp difficulty as fast as possible and then attempt to get a single lucky roll that eclipses the honest network, much less likely to be successful.21:04
bramcThe intuitions behind that all make sense, but I have a feeling that if one slogs through all the calculations the rule doesn't help all that much21:07
bramcThen again, it does no harm, so there's no reason to change it.21:07
bramcalthough I'm curious enough as to whether it helps that I might slog through all that crap on principle.21:08
-!- jtimon [~quassel@c51-71.i07-13.onvol.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:08
gmaxwellwell you might be surprised to find out that an attacker with a constant 1% of the hashpower who continally attempts to replace the chain will be successful with probablity 1; assuming hashrate grows exponentially. The maximum increase greatly reduces the probablity of success in any finite time window for that attack though.21:10
gmaxwell(1% can be any constant percentage. could be 0.001% so long as its a not a falling fraction)21:11
bramcThat is surprising.21:11
-!- zwischenzug [~zwischenz@pool-108-51-197-41.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]21:12
phantomcircuitbramc, your odds of success within any reasonable finite time period remain very low21:12
phantomcircuithmm actually i haven't run the math on that21:12
phantomcircuitdo they?21:12
gmaxwellattacker constantly ramps that difficulty in their fork as fast as they can; hoping to get lucky.21:12
bramcgmaxwell, intuitively their EV should remain the same regardless of difficulty21:13
gmaxwellphantomcircuit: they do, but they are _much_ higher, without limits on how fast you can ramp the difficulty.21:14
gmaxwellbramc: it's not the sort of attack that has positive expectation. You'll mine less than if you mined honestly with this strategy in the expectation.21:14
bramcOh, so it's all about undoing transactions?21:15
bramcOr rather, claiming transactions for yourself, in case transaction rewards are greater than mining rewards?21:15
-!- sipa [~pw@2a02:348:5e:5a29::1] has quit [Changing host]21:16
-!- sipa [~pw@unaffiliated/sipa1024] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:16
gmaxwellYes. There can still be rewards other than just mining; e.g. from stealing coins ... Or the motiviation can be just setting things on fire, which some people do from time to time if they can.21:16
bramcDid somebody say that Stellar got a spontaneous fork without even an attacker?21:19
sipayes21:19
bramcDid they fix it? My impression is that Stellar is for all intents and purposes a centralized system.21:20
amillerstellar hired a reputable distributed systems researcher from stanford, they're working on building a legitimate reliable system21:21
gmaxwellThey fixed it by centeralizing it completely, which indeed works.21:21
amillerthe gossip i heard is that they are going to preserve some kind of dynamic membership, where the graph of 'good' nodes has to have adequate overlap21:22
gmaxwellamiller: he'd been working for them since their public announcement; which was written in weird third party tone to make it sound like he was an independant auditer.21:22
bramcWell, Jed never did send me his whitepaper, probably because he didn't feel like having me shit on it.21:23
amillerbramc, ripple has *a* whitepaper that i believe is true to jed's algroithm, but it sucks21:23
bramcamiller, He told me this after he'd left ripple, but maybe he was talking about the same thing21:23
gmaxwellI'm still a bit torked that I _specifically_ pointed out exactly this failure mode back when ripple was originally announced and even only barely described (as they didn't provide any real documentation basically for years); and they're all happily pretending that this was some huge surprise.21:23
gmaxwell(Amiller also pointed this out)21:24
bramcAlthough the first time he told me about how it worked I shat on the idea that there were going to be any other servers participating in the consensus building. That was before I knew about bitcoin's loophole in such difficulties.21:24
amilleri told jed on the phone this in like jan 201321:24
amillergmaxwell, i think what you are saying is that the stanford prof was on their roster even prior to their forkpocalypse?21:25
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]21:27
gmaxwellamiller: Yes sir. David Mazières https://web.archive.org/web/20141110135852/https://www.stellar.org/    (archive.org is screwy and won't seem to load the snapshots on the day stellar was made public)21:27
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:27
moaI think stellar has ricardian contracts, so a brighter supernova?21:27
gmaxwellamiller: which is part of why I found this https://www.stellar.org/blog/safety_liveness_and_fault_tolerance_consensus_choice/ to be pretty dishonest sounding.21:28
amilleri don't think that matters, maybe i'm just a sucker for academic social proof... i'm still giving prof mazieres the benefit of the doubt and eagerly awaiting what they come up with next... my speculation is that it's going to be technically sound but 'not-all-that-decentralized'21:28
bramcThe web pages which turn up when searching for 'ricardian contracts' read like they were written by marketing droids.21:29
gmaxwellsure, it's not hard to make something sound; thats part of why it was so horrifying what they had before.21:29
amillercircadian contracts21:29
moagood one21:29
* amiller quits while ahead21:30
moaself-signed circularity21:30
gmaxwellbramc: in any case the thing where the ripple/stellar consensus model is broken is just that that it's a quourom protocol where the participants don't necessarily have identical views of the membership. If you centeralized control of the membership via an external process, it works fine. If you don't you can end up with a topology where multiple orthorgonal majorities can exist, which means doom.21:31
-!- bsm117532 [~bsm117532@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]21:31
bramcgmaxwell, Yeah that was obvious to me from the get-go but I didn't think through all the failure modes, just figured that it was a huge pain to do it in a way which worked21:32
-!- ryanxcharles [~ryan@2601:9:4680:dd0:e891:e614:e2c:10f] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:33
bramcIt should be possible to throw in some voting about who to let into the group of voters and the like, which has obvious vulnerabilities but works if nodes mostly work and mostly evaluate each other well.21:33
bramcLike, it shouldn't fall apart when all the nodes are being run by the same company :-P21:33
gmaxwellit seemed like opencoin/ripplelabs heavily controlled participation; I always assumed this meant they understood the problem and were just being dishonest about the decenteralization claims (or at least using a very weak definition of decenteralized). That stellar let it break suggests that at least some of the involved people just had no clue, even after having it pointed out to them.21:33
gmaxwellbramc: yea, you can't have a system like where advertised you make your systems only listen to peers _you_ trust, but you can always have the prior membership elect a new membership.  Thats not very decenteralized, ... esp since the prior membership can possibly go back and fork the history if any later membership later votes them off the island or dillutes them below their level of preference.21:35
bramcWell you can't let any yahoo who volunteers be part of the voting group or overriding the majority is trivial21:35
bramcgmaxwell, Presumably any such system has safeguards where peers don't allow retroactive reorgs past some point21:36
gmaxwellat least in debate on bitcoin talk ripple's answer there appeared to be was just that people would configure their own trust reflecting the real world(tm) and yahoos just won't be trusted enough to matter.21:36
gmaxwellbramc: IIRC the software is actually completely unable to reorg at all, though it's been a while since I looked at it.   You still have an issue for nodes which had been offline (or are new).21:36
phantomcircuitgmaxwell, i believe it doesn't even explode if there's a reorg21:38
phantomcircuitit just ignored is21:38
phantomcircuitignores*21:38
bramcThis is sounding profoundly busted on a number of levels21:38
Taekonly if your voters or trusted nodes get corrupted21:39
bramcIt's completely reasonable to have a 'somewhat' centralized system, but it's absolutely critical that there be a mechanism where the voting members can vote in and out new members, and the conditions in which it forks need to be well-defined.21:39
gmaxwellbramc: well thats fine if you have a true consensus system where only one majority can exist... and if the majority approves, you never change your mind. Makes things much simpler too.21:39
gmaxwellbut not even remotely decenteralized.21:40
bramcgmaxwell, You can use the consensus system to make decisions about who gets into the voting group21:40
bramcWhich arguably adds a little bit of potential decentralization to the whole thing21:40
bramcIt at least makes it so the system won't explode just because the sysadmin screwed something up21:41
gmaxwellI mentioned that above, indeed. But it's not clear how much it adds. (I suppose it would be a prudent design to support none the less)21:41
moatin foil hat ... maybe stellar was Jed's death star for ripple, sure shone a bright light on the dark side of that project whatever the case21:41
bramcThere doesn't seem to be any point at all to supporting distributed consensus if you don't apply it to membership as well21:42
bramcWithout that, it's a booby trap21:42
gmaxwellbramc: well the point is perhaps regulatory indirection and playing to todays favorite flavors for asset speculation mania.21:42
gmaxwellAt least I'd always assumed that to be the case, the poof failure of the network seems at odds with that. "I notice I am confused" ::shrugs::21:43
gmaxwellkinda sad, there are plenty of legit applications for reduced risk centeralized transaction systems.21:43
phantomcircuitgmaxwell, why not both?21:43
-!- cornus_ammonis [~Cornus@pool-96-255-179-93.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]21:44
moa"When the Ripple network was created, 100 billion XRP was created. The  founders gave 80 billion XRP to the OpenCoin Inc. OpenCoin Inc. will  develop the Ripple software."21:44
sipait seems that you really just want to admit a system is centralized, and get the best out of that21:45
bramcEven a centralized 'cryptocurrency' at least has public key stuff going for it, so the centralized system can't forge transfers21:45
gmaxwellsipa: we don't have good language for this stuff; centeralized or not is a binary distinction but the real risk analysis is more complex.21:45
sipaagree21:45
sipait seems a 'fixed' version of ripple is a federation with consensus-approved membership changes21:46
gmaxwellbramc: well the ripple stuff can forge transfers fine. It has a consensus ledger, not a consensus history. So if the voting nodes decide that you really have 2000 trillion ripples, thus it is so.21:46
sipawhich is definitely not centralized in a distributed systems meaning (it has no central point if failure)21:46
bramcThere is interesting stuff in ripple about making new 'currencies', but that doesn't need any cryptocurrency stuff to be done, arguably is better off being centralized.21:47
bramcgmaxwell, Oh right, that's true21:47
bramcThat leaves basically none of the elements of actually being a cryptocurrency21:48
gmaxwellwell the original ripple stuff (ryan fluger's work) didn't need a consensus at all for the most part (there was some complexity about atomically killing a partially completed order);  for the most part the transactions were all participant to participant; as it is a debt network.21:48
gmaxwellE.g. If I want to pay you but you won't accept my IOUs, but you'll accept sipa ones, and sipa will accept my IOUs.. this is something we should be able to work out among ourselves without extensive participation in a global consensus network.21:49
bramcgmaxwell, Yes and this all sounds fairly reasonable for talking about, say, RMB deposits21:50
phantomcircuitgmaxwell, interactively it's easy21:50
phantomcircuitotherwise not so much21:51
bramcBut having centralized auditing makes it all so much easier.21:51
gmaxwellyes indeed, making transactions span offline people was one of the excuses given for adding the global consensus network.21:51
-!- cornus_ammonis [~Cornus@pool-173-73-119-83.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:51
moaand the 'gateways' would handle the most of the debt confusion users experienced figuring out who owed or owned what21:52
bramcIt seemed like ripple was a good system for setting up an RMP<->USD conversion market21:52
bramcI mean RMB, not RMP21:52
gmaxwellthough there is no reason I could come up with where you couldn't have a system that was truly person to person; but supported delegating your identity to a federation of signers (a _little_ consensus network) that acted in your stead.21:52
phantomcircuitgmaxwell, which is amusing since the only thing people use is always on trusted gateways21:52
sipawhat is RMB?21:53
bramcgmaxwell, it being centralized allows the trusted third party to do basic auditing of how much debt everybody claims they've issued21:53
phantomcircuitsipa, chinese currency21:53
bramcsipa, renminbi, aka the yuan, the chinese currency21:53
-!- coinheavy [~coinheavy@2602:306:ce9f:f5b0:8c89:784b:cd45:309a] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:53
sipaah21:54
gmaxwellbramc: sure, though you could also do that with a potentially seperate centeralized network per user as part of that users identity.  Even parts that could benefit from centeralization or consensus don't need to be global.21:54
bramcsipa, If my understanding of the thing about schnorr signatures you scrawled is correct, collaborative 2-of-2 schnorr signatures are as simple as adding up our public keys to get the joint public key, and adding together our individual signatures of something to get the joint signature21:55
sipayup21:55
gmaxwellYou shouldn't care how much debt _I_ have issued, because it's sipa thats obligated to pay you. (you would, however, care about what his exposure is).21:55
sipabut you need to agree on a public nonce first21:55
bramcgmaxwell, A lot more shenanigans are possible without the trusted third party, and allowing the debts to flow freely between them requires centralized information to work well.21:56
bramcsipa, Is the nonce one time or repeated? Can it be derived from the hash of the thing to be signed?21:56
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@81.196.160.52] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:57
bramcSupposedly Stellar is doing massive business now, anybody know if that's true and if so what their business actually is?21:57
gmaxwellbramc: I think you're missing the point there though. Yes, you need a TTP of some kind to help you audit sipa's activity (whom you moderately trust) ... but you don't care about me, and I could be off in china, using a different TTP for auditing of my activity.21:57
sipabramc: so typically you do ECDH simultaneously with signing21:57
phantomcircuit<gmaxwell> You shouldn't care how much debt _I_ have issued, because it's sipa thats obligated to pay you. (you would, however, care about what his exposure is).21:58
phantomcircuitit's not really that simple though21:58
sipaso everyone picks a secret nonce (potentially deterministically from message + your own private key)21:59
phantomcircuiteverybody in the debt chain is potentially liable21:59
sipapublishes the public point associated with thir nonce21:59
sipaeveryone adds all public nonces together21:59
sipaincluding their own21:59
sipaand the result is the public nonce used21:59
sipathis results in people not knowing eachother's private nonces22:00
gmaxwellphantomcircuit: at least how ripple was proposed, when you paid someone your IOU you were absolutely obligated to make good on it. If other people screwed you on IOUs they owed you, that was your problem.22:00
bramcsipa, I think I follow well enough to get the message flows right. They're very simple.22:00
gmaxwellphantomcircuit: no clue if it would work out in the real world(tm), but at least thats the idea as I understand it.22:01
-!- user7779_ [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:01
bramcBasically we all agree on what we want to sign, and we all make our part of the signature, and any yutz, even someone who isn't one of us, can combine them to make the signature proper22:01
phantomcircuitgmaxwell, im pretty sure that wouldn't work in the "real world"22:02
phantomcircuitsince you're basically passing bad notes22:02
-!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]22:02
-!- user7779078 [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-japzmffneynferrr] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]22:03
gmaxwellphantomcircuit: it's not a 'passing' though. nothing flows through anyone. I recieve a object of type A, and give someone else an object of type B.22:03
-!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:03
sipabramc: right, but it's not "everyone signs and then adds sigs", it is "everyone publishes nonce, everyone receives everyone's nonce, everyone signs, someone adds the sigs together"22:04
-!- coinheavy [~coinheavy@2602:306:ce9f:f5b0:8c89:784b:cd45:309a] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]22:04
sipabramc: there are necessarily 2 communication rounds22:04
gmaxwellOf course, it's more relistic if the asset is bitcoin; and then you can do constant automatic settlement on the backend, along with proof of solvency,  so it can never get too far out of wack for too long.22:04
sipaunless you have predetermined public nonces which are usable only once22:04
bramcsipa, Gotcha, thanks22:04
phantomcircuitgmaxwell, eh i suspect you'd have a hard to arguing that in court22:04
bramcgmaxwell, It's nice to have simultaneous transfer22:04
phantomcircuitbut i suspect you'd have a hard time arguing about this at all in court22:05
moa^^ which goes for anything crypto rpretty much22:06
gmaxwellphantomcircuit: perhaps, it's a weaker security model for sure; where I'd talked about it on bct was always in the context of vending machines and paying for songs and such.22:07
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@2605:6000:1018:c04a:7db2:1af7:8c50:bfaf] has quit [Quit: Leaving...]22:09
phantomcircuitgavinandresen, your pr to switch to txid caching is likely broken as gmaxwell pointed out22:23
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]22:24
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:25
gmaxwellphantomcircuit: I am not sure about that. some of the tests that it breaks are redundant ones.22:26
gmaxwellbut I do think it wouldn't be hard for it that to be an issue or become an issue.22:27
-!- cryptowest [~cryptowes@191.101.1.104] has quit [Excess Flood]22:31
-!- cryptowest [~cryptowes@191.101.1.104] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:31
-!- zwischenzug [~zwischenz@pool-108-51-197-41.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:32
-!- cryptowest [~cryptowes@191.101.1.104] has quit [Excess Flood]22:33
-!- cryptowest [~cryptowes@191.101.1.104] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:36
-!- Starduster_ [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:43
-!- Starduster [~guest@unaffiliated/starduster] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]22:45
-!- user7779078 [user777907@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-vyfoavbssgyxuyhg] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:45
-!- user7779_ [~user77790@ool-4a5987f1.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]22:48
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:53
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:304:cff8:1580:2137:d63a:c035:4b69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:05
phantomcircuitgmaxwell, sure and there's no reason it couldn't work like that (well except the dos issue which seems to be a non issue)23:06
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaways.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]23:06
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@gtng-d9ba15c8.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:06
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]23:09
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]23:37
-!- kyuupichan [~Neil@ad052024.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]23:56
--- Log closed Fri Feb 27 00:00:06 2015

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!