2015-06-23.log

--- Log opened Tue Jun 23 00:00:31 2015
--- Day changed Tue Jun 23 2015
CodeSharkof course, it's hard to measure this very accurately00:00
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@dslb-088-070-161-193.088.070.pools.vodafone-ip.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]00:00
-!- Mably [56401ec5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.197] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:05
CodeSharkit largely depends on the hash power distribution00:06
CodeSharkbut I guess we can make some simplifying assumptions00:06
CodeSharklike assuming that nobody controls more than x%00:06
CodeSharkactually, encouraging small miners to publish their work more frequently (at lower difficulty) would perhaps give us a better sense of hash power distribution00:08
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@78.179.116.60] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]00:08
CodeSharkand discouraging withholding attacks obviously would as well00:09
-!- shen_noe [~shen_noe@wired042.math.utah.edu] has quit [Quit: Leaving]00:23
-!- darwin_ [~darwin@88-103-255-166.jes.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:26
-!- Aquentin [~Aquentin@unaffiliated/aquentin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:29
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Quit: Bye]00:30
-!- jtimon [~quassel@69.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:30
-!- MoALTz_ [~no@78.11.179.104] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:30
-!- MoALTz [~no@78.11.179.104] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]00:33
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]00:34
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:34
-!- mountaingoat [~mountaing@unaffiliated/mountaingoat] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.2]00:39
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]00:40
-!- Aquentin [~Aquentin@unaffiliated/aquentin] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]00:42
-!- justanotherusr [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]00:45
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]00:49
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:49
-!- pollux-bts [uid52270@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hcjzxsdttbtkpezw] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]00:50
-!- pollux-bts [uid52270@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-yrdzjeuanwwzfehp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:50
-!- lnovy [~lnovy@2002:4d57:f055::1] has quit [Quit: Got root?]00:59
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:00
-!- andy-logbot [~bitcoin--@wpsoftware.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]01:03
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]01:03
-!- andy-logbot [~bitcoin--@wpsoftware.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:03
* andy-logbot is logging01:03
-!- SDCDev [~quassel@unaffiliated/sdcdev] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:11
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:11
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:11
-!- mountaingoat [~mountaing@unaffiliated/mountaingoat] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:14
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@78.179.116.60] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:15
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]01:18
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f10af17.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:19
-!- JackH [~Jack@host81-154-202-222.range81-154.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:22
-!- CoinMuncher [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:22
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@c3-219.i07-1.onvol.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]01:23
-!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:24
-!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.37] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:28
-!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]01:29
-!- lnovy [~lnovy@2002:4d57:f055::1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:30
-!- GAit [~lnahum@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]01:31
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]01:32
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]01:34
-!- sparetire_ [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has quit [Quit: sparetire_]01:43
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:44
-!- d1ggy [~d1ggy@p20030057E71FCD816CCE94F74A9B1175.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:44
-!- dgenr8 [~dgenr8@unaffiliated/dgenr8] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:46
-!- gielbier [~giel@f142219.upc-f.chello.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]01:47
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:52
-!- epscy [~epscy@176.126.241.239] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]01:56
maakutoday I learned that sha224(sha224(a) || sha224(b)) takes two rounds to calculate the outer hash01:57
maakuepic fail NIST01:57
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:59
phantomcircuitmaaku, dat padding02:01
-!- gielbier [~giel@095-096-099-140.static.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:01
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]02:03
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:07
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f10af17.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]02:08
-!- stonecoldpat1 [~a9380004@janus-nat-128-240-225-56.ncl.ac.uk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:10
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Client Quit]02:11
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:12
-!- stonecoldpat1 [~a9380004@janus-nat-128-240-225-56.ncl.ac.uk] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]02:15
-!- Populus [Populus@unaffiliated/populus] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:15
-!- Populus [Populus@unaffiliated/populus] has quit [Changing host]02:15
-!- Populus [Populus@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-vegrjmtyxydyyyet] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:15
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f10af17.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:16
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]02:20
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:20
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f10af17.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]02:20
maakuFIPS-202 has three bits of meaningless padding, because no reasons at all02:24
maakubut at least with the sha-3 block sizes it doesn't result in the same inconvenience02:24
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f10af17.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:25
-!- epscy [~epscy@176.126.241.239] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:26
-!- stonecoldpat [~a9380004@janus-nat-128-240-225-56.ncl.ac.uk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:32
-!- sundance30203_ [6abc6be8@gateway/web/freenode/ip.106.188.107.232] has quit [Quit: Page closed]02:33
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:38
-!- Tiraspol_ [~Tiraspol3@x5ce0f112.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:45
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]02:47
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@p20030057E7224868B57D32F32017A387.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:52
-!- d1ggy [~d1ggy@p20030057E71FCD816CCE94F74A9B1175.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]02:53
-!- yosd [~androirc@36.80.50.219] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:54
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:00
-!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8101:3c71:9422:f2cb:c0e2:3299] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]03:04
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:16
-!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]03:29
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]03:33
-!- hearn_ [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:35
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]03:38
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:40
-!- hearn_ [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]03:43
-!- prodatalab [~prodatala@2602:306:ceef:a750:577:5919:1b9c:af13] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:01
-!- Populus [Populus@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-vegrjmtyxydyyyet] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]04:01
-!- lnovy [~lnovy@2002:4d57:f055::1] has quit [Quit: Got root?]04:08
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EAB34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]04:11
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EAB34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:11
-!- prodatalab [~prodatala@2602:306:ceef:a750:577:5919:1b9c:af13] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]04:13
-!- Tiraspol_ is now known as Tiraspol04:15
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@x5ce0f112.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Changing host]04:15
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:15
-!- Mably [56401ec5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.197] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]04:15
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]04:16
-!- yosd [~androirc@36.80.50.219] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]04:31
-!- theymos [~theymos@unaffiliated/theymos] has quit [Quit: Bye]04:32
-!- theymos [~theymos@unaffiliated/theymos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:34
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:35
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has quit [Client Quit]04:35
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:35
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has quit [Client Quit]04:35
-!- MRL-Relay [~MRL-Relay@coreteam.monero.cc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:36
fluffyponytesting04:36
MRL-Relay[fluffypony] testing04:36
fluffyponyyay, works again04:36
-!- Aquentin [~Aquentin@unaffiliated/aquentin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:36
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:41
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has quit [Client Quit]04:41
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:41
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has quit [Client Quit]04:41
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:41
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has quit [Client Quit]04:41
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:43
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has quit [Client Quit]04:43
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:44
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has quit [Client Quit]04:44
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:44
-!- yosd [~androirc@114.124.6.161] has quit [Client Quit]04:44
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@76-255-129-88.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:56
-!- nessence [~alexl@c-68-51-194-2.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]05:00
-!- hashtag_ [~hashtagg_@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]05:03
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Quit: Leaving]05:04
-!- hashtagg_ [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]05:05
-!- Mably [56401ec3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.195] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:05
-!- lnovy [~lnovy@2002:4d57:f055::1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:08
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]05:10
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:12
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:17
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]05:18
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:18
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:21
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]05:24
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:25
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]05:25
-!- prodatalab [~prodatala@2602:306:ceef:a750:577:5919:1b9c:af13] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:27
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]05:29
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:30
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-57-0-181.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:33
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]05:35
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Quit: Bye]05:35
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:37
-!- cryptowe- [~cryptowes@191.101.1.104] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]05:38
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:41
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]05:42
-!- hashtag [~hashtagg_@cpe-98-157-219-44.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:50
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]06:07
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:07
-!- StephenM347 [~stephenm3@static-64-223-246-218.port.east.myfairpoint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:12
stonecoldpatwhat is mrl?06:12
fluffyponystonecoldpat: Monero Research Lab, https://lab.getmonero.org06:13
stonecoldpatahh cool! :)06:13
-!- cosmo [~james@unaffiliated/cosmo] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:15
-!- Mably [56401ec3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.195] has quit [Quit: Page closed]06:15
-!- Mably [56401ec3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.195] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:16
-!- droark [~droark@209-6-53-207.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:18
-!- binaryFate [~binaryFat@94.139.57.137] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:19
-!- binaryFate [~binaryFat@94.139.57.137] has quit [Client Quit]06:21
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]06:24
-!- c0rw|zZz is now known as c0rw1n06:24
-!- shesek [~shesek@IGLD-84-228-3-15.inter.net.il] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]06:24
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]06:27
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:27
leakypatpetertodd: is there any hashing power on Testnet with the full RBF patch?06:28
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:29
-!- ruby32 [~ruby32@38.121.165.30] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:32
-!- ruby32 [~ruby32@38.121.165.30] has left #bitcoin-wizards []06:32
-!- gielbier [~giel@095-096-099-140.static.chello.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]06:34
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has quit [Excess Flood]06:34
-!- shesek [~shesek@IGLD-84-228-3-15.inter.net.il] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:40
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:40
-!- Artimage [d88b8b32@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.216.139.139.50] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:43
-!- gielbier [~giel@f142219.upc-f.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:47
-!- copumpkin [~copumpkin@unaffiliated/copumpkin] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]06:48
-!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8101:3c71:4199:245b:b2ad:3a2c] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:48
-!- narwh4l [~michael@unaffiliated/thesnark] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:52
-!- UllrSkis [~UllrSkis@c-66-41-201-92.hsd1.mn.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]06:53
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]06:55
gavinand1esenHas anybody done any simulation or modeling or research into the interaction between the random nature of block-finding and users' time preference for having their transactions confirm sooner rather than later?06:59
-!- hashtag [~hashtagg_@cpe-98-157-219-44.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: Leaving]07:00
-!- ruby32 [~ruby32@38.121.165.30] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:00
-!- Xh1pher [~Xh1pher@pD9E3A97A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:01
-!- UllrSkis [~UllrSkis@c-66-41-201-92.hsd1.mn.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:03
-!- instagibbs [32f65962@gateway/web/freenode/ip.50.246.89.98] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:05
instagibbsthe more you frown at your wallet, the more it bumps the fee07:06
dgenr8gavinand1sen: as in, if poisson parameters were different, would users pay more or less for quick confirmation?  i guess you'd have to look at altcoins?07:06
instagibbsreally depends on the use case, clearly.07:08
instagibbsWonder if Bitpay has done a user study for their flow07:09
-!- davi [~davi@gnu/davi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:11
gavinand1esendgenr8: No, I'm thinking of the interaction between the random nature of finding blocks, either a maximum block or memory pool size, and people's willingness to pay more to see their transactions confirm sooner rather than later.07:13
dgenr8historically, highest fees - as measured in BTC - coincide with highest public interest and price runups. https://blockchain.info/charts/transaction-fees?timespan=all07:13
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 277 seconds]07:13
ThinThreadobv we should drastically raise txn fees then07:14
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]07:14
-!- droark [~droark@209-6-53-207.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: ZZZzzz…]07:14
gavinand1esenfees will automatically raise the next time we get a price spike07:14
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:15
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:15
gavinand1esen(fees as measured in dollars or euros)07:15
dgenr8gavinand1eses: yes but it's non-obvious that fees as measured in BTC have also spiked07:15
ThinThreadalmost forgot what dollars were07:15
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has quit [Excess Flood]07:16
gavinand1esendgenr8: that IS interesting, but makes sense to me-- prices spikes correspond with lots of new users, and more users == more demand for transactions == higher tx fees07:17
gavinand1esen(well, MORE tx fees at least)07:17
-!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:20
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:21
dgenr8gavinand1esen: more low-priority txes, less user sensitivity to fees07:22
dgenr8gavinand1esen: fees paid as a % of value transferred could also explain it. not sure if anyone's doing that tho07:22
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:23
-!- instagibbs [32f65962@gateway/web/freenode/ip.50.246.89.98] has quit [Quit: Page closed]07:25
-!- getplank [~getplank@65.88.88.203] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:29
-!- cosmo [~james@unaffiliated/cosmo] has quit [Quit: Leaving]07:29
-!- prodatalab [~prodatala@2602:306:ceef:a750:577:5919:1b9c:af13] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]07:38
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]07:45
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:46
-!- hearn [~mike@185.25.95.132] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:51
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]07:59
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:59
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:59
-!- jgarzik [~jgarzik@unaffiliated/jgarzik] has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]08:10
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]08:17
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@c-73-202-109-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:18
-!- prodatalab [~prodatala@2602:306:ceef:a750:577:5919:1b9c:af13] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:18
-!- jgarzik [~jgarzik@unaffiliated/jgarzik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:29
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:31
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has quit [Changing host]08:31
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:31
-!- _biO__ [~biO_@ip-37-24-195-112.hsi14.unitymediagroup.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:32
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has quit [Excess Flood]08:32
-!- _biO_ [~biO_@80.156.183.43] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]08:36
-!- _biO__ is now known as _biO_08:36
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:37
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:41
-!- prodatalab [~prodatala@2602:306:ceef:a750:577:5919:1b9c:af13] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]08:42
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has quit [Excess Flood]08:43
-!- hearn [~mike@185.25.95.132] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]08:44
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:46
-!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-185-201-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:49
maakuleakypat: there could be08:51
maakuphantomcircuit: can we deploy full-RBF to our miner?08:52
-!- Artimage [d88b8b32@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.216.139.139.50] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]08:52
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has quit [Excess Flood]08:54
-!- JackH [~Jack@host81-154-202-222.range81-154.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]08:56
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:57
-!- getplank [~getplank@65.88.88.203] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]08:58
-!- kmels [~kmels@186.64.110.122] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:59
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]08:59
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:59
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@c-73-202-109-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]09:00
-!- c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|away09:01
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]09:05
-!- shaul [~shaul@108.61.68.159] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:12
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:19
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]09:28
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:28
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:28
-!- Mably [56401ec3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.86.64.30.195] has quit [Quit: Page closed]09:31
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@74-95-207-205-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:34
-!- digitalmagus [~digitalma@unaffiliated/digitalmagus] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:35
-!- Artimage [d88b8b32@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.216.139.139.50] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:36
-!- CoinMuncher [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]09:40
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]09:46
-!- gielbier [~giel@f142219.upc-f.chello.nl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]09:53
-!- gielbier [~giel@f142219.upc-f.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:55
-!- getplank [~getplank@65.88.88.203] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:55
-!- davi [~davi@gnu/davi] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]10:01
-!- shen_noe [~shen_noe@wired042.math.utah.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:02
-!- Artimage [d88b8b32@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.216.139.139.50] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]10:04
-!- Artimage [d88b8b32@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.216.139.139.50] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:05
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]10:06
-!- jaekwon [~jae@2601:645:8001:f5c8:a165:1003:6577:710f] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:11
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@76-255-129-88.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]10:14
-!- rubensayshi [~ruben@91.206.81.13] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:15
-!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8101:3c71:4199:245b:b2ad:3a2c] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]10:18
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:18
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:22
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]10:24
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:25
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]10:27
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:27
-!- jb55 [~jb55@S0106cc3a6130fc32.vc.shawcable.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:28
-!- hearn_ [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:32
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]10:34
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@x5ce0f112.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:35
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@x5ce0f112.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Changing host]10:35
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:35
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]10:35
-!- jb55 [~jb55@S0106cc3a6130fc32.vc.shawcable.net] has quit []10:36
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:38
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]10:39
-!- hearn__ [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:39
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]10:41
-!- hearn_ [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]10:41
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:42
-!- hearn__ [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]10:44
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:53
-!- antanst [~Adium@37.6.195.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:53
-!- kmels [~kmels@186.64.110.122] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]10:53
-!- cosmo [~james@unaffiliated/cosmo] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:54
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]10:58
-!- Aquentin [~Aquentin@unaffiliated/aquentin] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]10:59
-!- MrTratta [~MrTratta@2-228-102-98.ip191.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:00
-!- antanst1 [~Adium@37.6.195.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:02
-!- antanst [~Adium@37.6.195.164] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:02
-!- antanst1 [~Adium@37.6.195.164] has quit [Client Quit]11:03
-!- kmels [~kmels@93.166.151.186.static.intelnet.net.gt] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:04
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]11:08
-!- Aquentin [~Aquentin@unaffiliated/aquentin] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:08
-!- droark [~droark@209-6-53-207.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:08
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]11:10
-!- nwilcox_ [~nwilcox@74-95-207-205-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:15
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]11:16
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:17
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]11:17
-!- nwilcox [~nwilcox@74-95-207-205-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]11:17
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]11:18
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:18
-!- luny` is now known as luny11:19
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-142-154.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:25
-!- lunchtime [lunchtime@S0106bc4dfb234e43.va.shawcable.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:29
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:30
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has quit [Excess Flood]11:39
-!- zmanian [~zmanian@c-24-5-125-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:43
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:44
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:47
-!- lunchtime [lunchtime@S0106bc4dfb234e43.va.shawcable.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving]11:51
-!- Populus [Populus@unaffiliated/populus] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:51
-!- Populus [Populus@unaffiliated/populus] has quit [Changing host]11:51
-!- Populus [Populus@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-sfnturbappgyizis] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:51
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:53
-!- justanotherusr [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:54
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]12:00
-!- nessence [~alexl@162.17.137.27] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:01
-!- Xh1pher [~Xh1pher@pD9E3A97A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]12:03
-!- kmels [~kmels@93.166.151.186.static.intelnet.net.gt] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]12:04
-!- shaul [~shaul@108.61.68.159] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]12:04
-!- kmels [~kmels@186.64.110.122] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:05
-!- zmanian [~zmanian@c-24-5-125-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]12:07
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:09
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]12:13
-!- prodatalab [~prodatala@2602:306:ceef:a750:577:5919:1b9c:af13] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:17
-!- nwilcox_ [~nwilcox@74-95-207-205-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Quit: leaving]12:20
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-57-0-181.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has quit [Quit: Leaving]12:24
-!- Artimage [d88b8b32@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.216.139.139.50] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]12:25
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EAB34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]12:34
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EAB34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:34
-!- kmels [~kmels@186.64.110.122] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]12:40
-!- jmcn_ [~jamie@2.24.158.73] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:48
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.69] has quit [Ping timeout: 277 seconds]12:52
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EAB34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]13:00
-!- Populus [Populus@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-sfnturbappgyizis] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]13:02
-!- kmels [~kmels@93.166.151.186.static.intelnet.net.gt] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:04
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-142-154.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]13:12
-!- MoALTz_ [~no@78.11.179.104] has quit [Quit: Leaving]13:14
-!- MoALTz [~no@78.11.179.104] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:20
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]13:21
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:22
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:23
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:24
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@x5ce0f112.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:28
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@x5ce0f112.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Changing host]13:28
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:28
-!- narwh4l [~michael@unaffiliated/thesnark] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:34
-!- bosma [~bosma@S01067cb21bda6531.vc.shawcable.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:34
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Quit: Leaving]13:39
-!- waxwing [~waxwing@62.205.214.125] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]13:39
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:40
-!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8101:3c71:4199:245b:b2ad:3a2c] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:41
-!- waxwing [~waxwing@62.205.214.125] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:41
-!- nivah [~linker@58.186.160.166] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:46
-!- hearn_ [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:49
-!- sparetire_ [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:51
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]13:51
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fpcguooryfpilxlb] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:57
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]13:59
-!- getplank [~getplank@65.88.88.203] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]14:00
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@x5ce0f112.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:00
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@x5ce0f112.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Changing host]14:00
-!- Tiraspol [~Tiraspol3@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:00
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f10af17.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]14:01
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]14:05
leakypatmaaku phantomcircuit that would be cool, I'm going to look at prototyping something in the testnet version of my wallet (but no point if there is noone running the patch :)14:05
-!- afk11 [~thomas@46.7.4.219] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]14:08
-!- getplank [~getplank@rrcs-72-43-97-147.nyc.biz.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:09
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:304:cff8:1580:c6e:e61f:4c56:8162] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:15
petertoddleakypat: what wallet is yours?14:15
leakypatNinki14:16
petertoddleakypat: ah cool - I jsut setup a mainnet full-rbf dns seed btw for wallet authors, I'll set a testnet one too14:16
-!- fragzle [~fr4ggs@li578-62.members.linode.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]14:16
leakypatcool14:17
petertoddmy latest full-rbf tree has the dns seed support in it, rbf-seed.btc.petertodd.org14:17
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]14:18
-!- hearn_ [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]14:20
-!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:20
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:20
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:20
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@c3-219.i07-1.onvol.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:23
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]14:23
petertoddleakypat: one thing you should do, is write your replacement code so it's full-rbf compatible, as well as fss-rbf compatible. The way I did that in my rbf demos was I made a variable for the minimum allowed value of the change output, and the loop that adding new inputs to make the change sufficiently large then would either start at 0 for full-rbf, or the previous value for fss-rbf14:23
-!- adam3us [~Adium@195.138.228.37] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]14:26
phantomcircuitmaaku, yes14:26
phantomcircuitmaaku, i'll get that working14:27
-!- nessence [~alexl@162.17.137.27] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:32
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-142-154.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:34
-!- shen_noe [~shen_noe@wired042.math.utah.edu] has quit [Quit: Leaving]14:34
-!- priidu [~priidu@unaffiliated/priidu] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]14:35
leakypatpetertodd: ok, I'll implement both as going to prod prob only feasible for fss (for the near future anyway)14:37
phantomcircuitpetertodd, which branch is the full rbf?14:38
-!- roy [~roy@darla.gnomon.org.uk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:39
-!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@148.Red-88-8-116.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has quit []14:40
royAm I right in thinking that not accepting non-final or soon-to-be-final transactions into mempool is a relatively recent change, or has that always been the case?14:41
petertoddphantomcircuit: https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/replace-by-fee-v0.10.214:42
petertoddleakypat: thanks!14:42
petertoddleakypat: lemme know how that goes - if it's not as easy to implement both with the same code I'd be interested in knowing why14:43
-!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@148.Red-88-8-116.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:43
petertoddroy: that was my first big contribution to bitcoin actually - been true for 2.5 years now14:43
roypetertodd: cool, thanks.  Was trying to understand the history of the evolution of functionality around this area (prompted by BIP68)14:45
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-142-154.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]14:48
royAlthough this also reminds me that the bit in the devloper guide (talking about nlocktime and sequence numbers) at least one place where it glosses over the history in a patronising sort of "things used to be different, but don't worry about it" way that I'm 99% convinced is likely to frustrate any developer14:49
petertoddroy: actually, that might be there because mike hearn tried to politicise it by pushing the old, broken, nSequence replacement scheme14:50
phantomcircuitpetertodd, testnet's majority hashrate is now rbf14:50
petertoddphantomcircuit: haha, awesome14:50
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]14:50
-!- cdecker [~cdecker@pc-10367.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:51
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@5ec323ea.skybroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:51
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@5ec323ea.skybroadband.com] has quit [Changing host]14:51
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:51
royI might propose a pull request - it's in github, right?  I don't want anything policical - just a very brief history of the semantics of transaction replacement, rather than saying things used to be different14:51
phantomcircuitpetertodd, and when i say majority i mean approximately 100%14:51
petertoddphantomcircuit: I'm going to have to aquire some equipment again to decentralize that situation :)14:52
phantomcircuitpetertodd, you will lose14:52
maakuphantomcircuit cheats14:52
phantomcircuiti am king of testnet!14:52
phantomcircuitking i say!14:52
royout of curiosity, what is the hash rate of testnet these days14:53
leakypatphantomcircuit: nice!14:53
maakuroy: two SP20 miners or so14:54
maakuroy: while you're at it, fix the off-by-one misconception about locktime14:54
maaku(you can't get in the chain until AFTER nLockTime)14:54
-!- hearn [~mike@84-75-197-78.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]14:57
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]15:07
phantomcircuitpetertodd, neat confrimed working15:11
petertoddphantomcircuit: wait, what's working?15:12
-!- nessence [~alexl@c-68-51-194-2.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:12
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:20
-!- roy is now known as roybadami15:22
-!- jb55 [~jb55@24.244.23.254] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:22
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@176.92.132.181] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:26
-!- erasmosp_ [~erasmospu@104.238.169.146] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:28
-!- _biO_ [~biO_@ip-37-24-195-112.hsi14.unitymediagroup.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:29
-!- erasmosp_ [~erasmospu@104.238.169.146] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:29
-!- ruby32 [~ruby32@38.121.165.30] has quit [Quit: ruby32]15:30
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@176.92.132.181] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]15:30
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]15:35
CodeSharkdoes RBF handle chains longer than a single transaction or replacing two lower fee transactions with one higher fee one?15:38
petertoddCodeShark: full RBF does15:38
petertoddleakypat: just pushed to my v0.10.2 full-RBF tree the new testnet rbf seed, rbf-seed.tbtc.petertodd.org15:38
petertoddleakypat: I also have a simple static dns record too, rbf-seed-static.tbtc.petertodd.org, and rbf-seed-static.btc.petertodd.org for mainnet15:39
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]15:39
CodeSharkleakypat, you're the ninki guy?15:40
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@176.92.132.181] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:40
-!- bosma_ [~bosma@S01067cb21bda6531.vc.shawcable.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:42
leakypatCodeShark: yes15:42
-!- bosma [~bosma@S01067cb21bda6531.vc.shawcable.net] has quit [Disconnected by services]15:42
-!- bosma_ is now known as bosma15:42
petertoddleakypat: what's the deal with the android wallet? can I use it without the desktop bit?15:43
leakypatYou can, but the idea is just to go through and complete the desktop setup15:43
petertoddleakypat: cool, installing now15:44
petertoddleakypat: let me know when you have some rbf code to test/review15:44
leakypatpetertodd: will do15:45
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@176.92.132.181] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]15:45
leakypatCodeShark: you run a wallet?15:45
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@104.238.169.146] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:45
-!- getplank [~getplank@rrcs-72-43-97-147.nyc.biz.rr.com] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]15:46
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Quit: Leaving]15:48
-!- darwin_ [~darwin@88-103-255-166.jes.cz] has quit []15:48
CodeSharkleakypat: mSIGNA15:51
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@104.238.169.146] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:52
CodeSharkit's not a problem for me to support fee increases for outbound transactions...or transactions sent from another node using the same account...but SPV makes it a little hard to compute fees for inbound transactions, generally speaking15:54
CodeSharkexcept for special cases (where the inputs are all the same)15:55
CodeSharkand even then it's only possible to compute the fee difference, not the exact fee15:55
CodeSharkI hate SPV :p15:55
CodeSharkor rather, I hate that transaction inputs don't contain the value15:56
CodeSharkor that there's no simple mechanism to query that information in an efficient, private manner15:56
CodeSharkbut SPV also makes it basically impossible to check for double-spends involving longer chains unless you maintain your own mempool15:57
CodeSharkbut you cannot build a mempool without having the utxo set15:58
CodeSharkso SPV is jacked :p15:58
CodeSharkcompletely15:58
CodeSharkplease, please, please...let's start talking about moving to an O(log n) verification protocol that doesn't have a special "simplified" mode :p15:59
CodeSharkwhat matters, ultimately, are risk metrics, probabilities, and game theory :p16:00
CodeSharkand computational complexity theory and all that...but we'll take those as givens for now16:00
Luke-Jrpetertodd: wait, RBF includes full CPFP mempool logic?16:01
-!- jgarzik [~jgarzik@unaffiliated/jgarzik] has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]16:02
dgenr8CodeShark: what if you got a "proto-block" message when the tip of an unconfirmed chain pays your bloom filter (this probably has a name, bip, something of which I'm ignorant)16:04
-!- chmod755 [~chmod755@unaffiliated/chmod755] has quit [Quit: Leaving]16:06
CodeSharkdgenr8: that would at least make certain logic possible on the client...but it involves extra overhead for the relay node and has essentially no security16:06
dgenr8CodeShark: no security is just a consequence of 0conf16:06
CodeSharkdgenr8: point being not sure it's worth the effort for this use case...which is to have a way of warning the user that a double-spend has been detected16:07
CodeSharkif you can't even be sure that the proto-block is authentic, it's basically useless16:07
dgenr8CodeShark: serving SPV is one of the more important functions of a full node imho16:07
-!- jb55 [~jb55@24.244.23.254] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:08
CodeSharkif you want to use a trusted client-server model we can design a much higher txout request API :)16:08
CodeSharkmuch higher level16:08
-!- jb55 [~jb55@24.244.23.107] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:08
CodeSharkSPV basically serves no niche here16:08
CodeSharkyou either go full verification or you trust a server16:08
CodeSharkif you trust a server, might as well use high level queries16:09
dgenr8CodeShark: "here"?16:09
CodeSharkno niche in this space...ultimately16:09
CodeSharkit's terrible at verification, it's terrible at usability, it's terrible for development16:09
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0b4d.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]16:09
CodeSharkit's a lose lose lose16:09
dgenr8CodeShark: your idea of network-wide probabilistic verification is interesting16:10
CodeSharkI think ultimately we must abandon deterministic verification if we want any level of scalability (we do in a sense with sha256 already, but we could tolerate even higher failure probability)16:10
CodeSharkwhat really matters is that the risk level be computable...and that it be possible to either make failure rates negligible...or have mechanisms to mitigate failures16:12
-!- belcher_ [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:12
CodeSharkas for mechanisms, they could involve human players as part of the ecosystem (i.e. insurance or market makers)16:13
CodeSharkbasically, a way to manage risks16:13
-!- jb55 [~jb55@24.244.23.107] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]16:13
CodeSharkprobably far cheaper than forcing every single computer on earth to validate every single purchase of an espresso16:13
dgenr8CodeShark: short-term, with SPV, if you could ask your peers to send parent chains, you can watch for double-spends.16:13
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-142-154.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:14
CodeSharkI already ask for the node mempool...and assuming the node is trusted, this isn't a problem16:14
-!- belcher [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]16:14
dgenr8how often?16:14
CodeSharkalthough it would probably be better to just add better query logic to the server side to simplify the client logic :)16:14
-!- shaul [~shaul@208.167.254.219] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:14
CodeSharksince the server perforce is better informed to make better decisions and presumably has more resources16:15
CodeSharkarchitecting it so that this logic is on the client side is totally stupid unless it provides some amount of additional security/privacy16:15
-!- jgarzik [~jgarzik@unaffiliated/jgarzik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:16
CodeSharkI query the mempool after the block sync...but then I set a bloom filter16:17
CodeSharkso it would probably make more sense to just get rid of the bloom filter after doing the historical sync16:17
CodeSharkand then just assume that transactions that don't connect to other transactions in the mempool must connect to the blockchain somewhere16:18
CodeSharkbut argh...I mean...seriously?!?!16:18
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@239-196-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]16:18
dgenr8CodeShark: i wonder what hearn thinks16:18
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]16:22
-!- StephenM347 [~stephenm3@static-64-223-246-218.port.east.myfairpoint.net] has quit []16:22
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:22
CodeSharkapparently this is what he thinks: https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/blob/0.10.2A/src/main.cpp#L410716:22
CodeSharkbut without txout commitments, might as well write a REST API :p16:24
CodeSharklol16:24
CodeSharkmight as well just build a bc.i16:24
jgarzikCodeShark, welcome to our arguments from ~12 months ago :)16:26
jgarzikCodeShark, this is why getutxos isn't upstream...16:26
CodeSharkyes, I'm aware of that16:26
CodeSharkthere really is no way to fix SPV16:27
CodeSharkSPV is completely busted and full validation is hitting a scalability wall...I hate to be a pessimist here...but....16:29
leakypat <CodeShark> but without txout commitments, might as well write a REST API :p16:29
leakypat^16:29
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:31
-!- melvster [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:32
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:304:cff8:1580:c6e:e61f:4c56:8162] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]16:35
-!- nessence [~alexl@c-68-51-194-2.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:36
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:37
-!- adam3us [~Adium@c3-219.i07-1.onvol.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:41
-!- adam3us2 [~Adium@c3-219.i07-1.onvol.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:42
-!- adam3us [~Adium@c3-219.i07-1.onvol.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]16:42
-!- zmanian [~zmanian@12.226.88.52] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:43
-!- adam3us1 [~Adium@c3-219.i07-1.onvol.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]16:43
* CodeShark summons the ghost of satoshi and asks WTF?!?!16:45
phantomcircuitCodeShark, the getutxo stuff is entirely so that mike could collect his $100k for building lighthouse16:47
phantomcircuitwhich is afaict useless16:47
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-142-154.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]16:50
CodeSharkI've unfortunately been in situations before where I had to deliver stuff for clients I knew wouldn't really work in the end...it can be hard not to be seduced into fooling yourself16:51
CodeSharkmy awareness of this is largely why I actively refuse to let that happen here16:53
dgenr8CodeShark: a parent chain with merkle proofs for all the inputs along the way doesn't work?16:54
CodeSharkdgenr8: there's no merkle proof for mempool transactions...but yes, you could have merkle proofs for inputs that do connect to the blockchain16:55
CodeSharkbut again...is it really worth the effort? :)16:56
dgenr8CodeShark: right i imagine having a full mempool involves adding a lot.  we need libmempool16:56
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has quit [Quit: Leaving]16:56
akrmnutxo commitments are a flawed system also, because there is no incentive for nodes to relay the merkle tree branches16:56
CodeSharkutxo commitments were my last hope of "fixing" SPV - but I give up - we need a new validation mechanism16:57
phantomcircuitakrmn, and are stupid expensive to calculate16:58
phantomcircuitO(n log n) n = utxo entries16:58
akrmndoes anyone have a link to a proposal for miner decentralization that doesn't involve tree chain like structures?16:59
akrmnlike something that has a good chance of scaling16:59
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@78.179.116.60] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]17:00
leakypatpetertodd: do you have builds for the RBF client or am I to compile from github myself?17:00
-!- shen_noe [~shen_noe@172.56.17.126] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:02
-!- jaekwon [~jae@2601:645:8001:f5c8:a165:1003:6577:710f] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]17:05
-!- kmels [~kmels@93.166.151.186.static.intelnet.net.gt] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]17:09
CodeSharkakrmn: working on ideas - hopefully one of these days I can be more constructive on this front rather than mostly pointing out how what we have won't work :p17:09
akrmnCodeShark: My best idea is tree-structured subchains, but if someone has a better idea I would like to read it17:13
akrmnI guess we can just set a limit on the scalability and rely on contracts17:13
akrmnbut doesn't seem elegant to me17:13
petertoddleakypat: no builds just yet; will soon17:14
petertoddleakypat: just did rbf for v0.11.0rc2 actually: https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/replace-by-fee-v0.11.0rc217:15
-!- c0rw|away is now known as c0rw1n17:15
-!- sy5error [~sy5error@unaffiliated/sy5error] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:16
petertoddleakypat: also working on a fix so full and fss RBF will be more compatibile, so you can use both at the same time17:17
CodeSharka few things: 1) it's not necessary for everyone to verify everyone else's stuff...what really matters is that validators don't collude to fool everyone else. 2) it's not necessary to check everything...it is enough that the rate of failure be sufficiently negligible and we can rely on nondeterminism. 3) It is better for those who need to construct proofs to have some stake in the result so that incentives are there to do17:17
CodeShark so. 4) Risk can be managed by adding collective fees of some sort...or encouraging insurance, market making, and other such people who are willing to assume risk17:17
-!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@92.74-67-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]17:17
-!- c0rw1n [~c0rw1n@92.74-67-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:17
CodeShark5) a nested structure is probably a good idea, with the stuff closer to the root representing more global consensus states17:18
-!- jaekwon [~jae@2601:645:8001:f5c8:a165:1003:6577:710f] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:20
akrmnCodeShark: I think you have the same idea as me (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1083345.0)17:22
akrmnYou just need a way to keep deep forks minimal. That's what I'm trying to think about now.17:23
-!- airbreather [~AirBreath@d149-67-99-43.nap.wideopenwest.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:24
akrmnlike if a deep child chain has a mistake, do all the other chains get affected?17:24
akrmnI think it should be acceptable to keep going even if there is a small mistake in a child chain transaction17:24
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fpcguooryfpilxlb] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]17:24
CodeSharkregarding things like invalid blocks, we could just roll back the bad transactions and their dependencies and punish the miner rather than rolling back the entire block if a bad transaction is discovered17:25
CodeSharkbut the process of rolling back transaction dependencies is not that cheap17:25
CodeSharkit gets more expensive with time...but at least it results in far less disruption to everyone else17:26
akrmnI think once a transaction goes from a child chain to a parent chain, the parent chain has to stick with it17:26
akrmneven if later a mistake is found in the child chain transaction17:26
-!- Aquentin [~Aquentin@unaffiliated/aquentin] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]17:27
-!- freewil [~freewil@unaffiliated/freewil] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:27
akrmnbut good to know I'm not the only one thinking about these things. Sipa doesn't seem to like it. He seems to think that only omniscient nodes are useful for network security. But I think with this kind of rule that I just gave, it can limit the effect on the parent chains so maybe it is more acceptable.17:29
CodeSharkI think sipa's main critique, if I remember seeing it right, was the cost of transfering between chains17:29
-!- triazo [~adam@198.23.202.102] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]17:30
akrmnthere's no delay if the parent gets to commit to the child.17:30
-!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8101:3c71:4199:245b:b2ad:3a2c] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]17:35
CodeSharkso one way is fast, but what about going in the other direction?17:38
akrmn(I mean: If an output goes in a transaction in a child chain, and then later in a transaction in a parent chain, then even though the value in the child chain is later found out to be wrong, nodes should just keep going with the value in the parent chain)17:38
akrmnstill need to clarify that17:38
akrmnthe child chain trusts the parent chain so it's easy the other way also17:39
dgenr8CodeShark: setting aside radical redesigns of the blockchain, and ignoring privacy, a way to ask your remaining peers to prove a new tx invalid would seem very helpful17:39
CodeSharkdgenr8: if we could somehow reward peers for doing so you may be onto something17:41
CodeSharkthen the main threat would be at the network level...where someone manages to block your connections to honest nodes17:42
CodeShark(ignoring privacy for a moment)17:43
dgenr8CodeShark: is that a big issue? they aren't rewarded for anything else...17:43
CodeSharkdgenr8: how costly is it for the node to do this? we'd need a full txout index, no?17:45
CodeSharkI mean, a full tx index17:45
CodeSharkor hmm...I guess spent outputs don't really matter17:46
CodeSharkexcept for reorgs17:46
CodeSharkit would actually be possible to pay people for these proofs if only the bitcoin script could reference other parts of the blockchain :p17:49
dgenr8CodeShark: first task is to decide what the question would be, and what the answer would look like. then how to get there.17:50
dgenr8CodeShark: sorry i can't just point you at a commit ;)17:52
CodeSharkheh17:52
CodeSharkso the question is: does this transaction conflict with any other transaction you know of? and the answer is a proof that they spend a common input17:53
CodeSharkthey or one of their dependencies, that is17:54
CodeSharkso in the general case it requires constructing two dependency chains - but it's easier to prove conflict than to prove that they connect to the blockchain17:55
CodeSharkso we really have two questions here17:55
dgenr8you started out just concerned about double-spends17:55
CodeSharkright - if you are only concerned about double-spends then just demonstrating a shared spent output is sufficient17:56
CodeSharkand you'd probably want to be able to check the signatures along the way17:56
CodeSharkbut hmm17:57
-!- nessence [~alexl@c-68-51-194-2.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:57
CodeSharkeven checking signatures, unless you check that they do connect to the main chain it's super simple to cheat17:57
CodeSharkyou could stick your own transactions in the middle and sign them...and they'll never confirm17:57
-!- jaekwon [~jae@2601:645:8001:f5c8:a165:1003:6577:710f] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]17:58
CodeSharkso it doesn't really seem worth doing unless you can prove that they do connect17:59
dgenr8ofc17:59
CodeSharkright, so I take that back :p17:59
CodeSharkit is not sufficient to just show a shared spent output :)17:59
CodeSharkI guess a more general question is: show me how this transaction connects to the block chain18:01
dgenr8an invalidation proof could consist of a single connected conflicting spend18:01
CodeSharkright18:01
-!- zmanian [~zmanian@12.226.88.52] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]18:03
dgenr8do you check whether other peers inv'ed a tx that pays you?  that means they like it18:04
dgenr8oh you have a filter18:04
CodeSharkyeah - lol18:04
dgenr8gtg ttyl18:05
CodeSharklater, dgenr8 - thanks for the thoughts18:05
CodeSharkakrmn: still looking over your proposal...18:06
phantomcircuitCodeShark, nobody has yet shown an efficient way do fraud proofs for aggregate limits short of zk-SNARKS18:07
phantomcircuitproposals to commit to the aggregate limit values in fixed locations are the closest but have significant issues18:08
CodeSharkdoesn't have to be zk, but yeah18:09
CodeSharkthe thing is that it is probably not necessary for everyone to check the fraud proofs18:10
CodeSharkbut I sense self-reference here :p18:11
CodeSharksomeone then needs to construct a fraud proof of the fraud proof :p18:12
phantomcircuitCodeShark, everybody needs to check the fraud proofs that they receive18:14
phantomcircuitthe problem is that the fraud proof for aggregate limit violations is... the entire block18:14
phantomcircuitoops18:14
akrmnCodeShark: Thanks. I don't really have a high level of popularity in this community, so it is hard to get people to give serious feedback18:14
dgenr8CodeShark: XT nodes relay direct double-spends that match your filter.  but not when they appear in a block, and not when the conflict is with an ancestor.18:15
dgenr8CodeShark: as the author of that patch i'm going to consider that ...18:15
akrmnalso I have to rewrite some things more clearly18:16
CodeSharkphantomcircuit: I was speaking regarding the ability to reward fraud proofs18:17
phantomcircuitCodeShark, uh18:17
CodeSharkbut yeah, let's not get into that problem yet18:17
phantomcircuithow do you reward the producer of a fraud proof?18:17
phantomcircuitim not sure that's possible18:17
CodeSharkwith a script that can reference the relevant parts of the state18:17
CodeSharksigned by both18:17
phantomcircuitCodeShark, and you pass the fraud proof off to a node18:19
phantomcircuitwho immediately removes your script and issues a new fraud proof with his18:19
CodeSharkhence requiring both signatures18:19
phantomcircuitboth?18:20
CodeSharkyes, it requires some blinding18:20
CodeSharkmight require some pk fancy crypto :p18:20
CodeSharkbut I think it's possible18:21
CodeSharkerr, zk fancy crypto18:21
phantomcircuitCodeShark, im thinking it's impossible18:21
phantomcircuitthe other party has to be able to validate the fraud proof18:21
CodeSharkthree phases:18:21
phantomcircuitin which case they can generate their own18:21
CodeSharkactually four rounds18:22
CodeShark1) party A requests proof from party B. 2) party B supplies zk proof, 3) party A signs, 4) party B reveals plaintext proof18:22
CodeSharkthe script is only satisfied if (4) happens, of course18:23
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]18:26
CodeSharkthere might even be a way to condense it into only two rounds with some more clever tricks18:28
-!- Madars [~null@unaffiliated/madars] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]18:30
-!- Madars [~null@unaffiliated/madars] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:30
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@xd9bf728c.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:53
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@xd9bf728c.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Changing host]18:53
-!- Dr-G [~Dr-G@unaffiliated/dr-g] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:53
-!- Dr-G2 [~Dr-G@xd9bf77f7.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]18:56
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@p20030057E7224868B57D32F32017A387.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]19:03
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@p20030057E7224868B57D32F32017A387.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:03
-!- belcher_ [~belcher-s@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving]19:08
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@p20030057E7224868B57D32F32017A387.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]19:08
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@p20030057E7224868B57D32F32017A387.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:08
-!- airbreather [~AirBreath@d149-67-99-43.nap.wideopenwest.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]19:18
-!- c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|zZz19:18
morcosThis was just posted by sdaftuar, some good thoughts on the dangers of the current hard fork crusade: https://medium.com/@sdaftuar/how-the-bitcoin-experiment-might-fail-7f6c24f99ecf19:22
-!- shen_noe [~shen_noe@172.56.17.126] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]19:23
-!- prodatalab [~prodatala@2602:306:ceef:a750:577:5919:1b9c:af13] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]19:32
-!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-185-201-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]19:46
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]20:00
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:16
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@76-255-129-88.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:19
-!- hashtag [~hashtag@cpe-69-23-213-3.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]20:21
-!- cosmo [~james@unaffiliated/cosmo] has quit [Quit: Leaving]20:22
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Disconnected by services]20:40
-!- [7] [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:40
-!- zooko [~user@2601:281:8101:3c71:c1bf:a4cf:7cc7:29d3] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:02
amillerhow "robust" is the assumption that people will treat something like money / like a commodity if it behaves one?21:12
amillerlike, how crappy can a monetary policy where tons of people will use a cryptocurrency based on it, and the system would still work21:12
amillerits too bad that there aren't yet many "appcoins" that have been a demonstrable success, because it would be easier to look at the incentives in those systems.. they wouldn't even necessarily need to compete21:14
amillernamecoin as a whole should be 'earning income' from domain name registration fees... my understanding is that no one is using it though21:14
amillerbut a cryptocurrency with some nice feature like that basically has an export economy of some kind, surely that can only help it21:15
phantomcircuitamiller, that nobody is using namecoin is itself a data point21:15
amilleryeah well i don't trust any strong inferences based on it :O21:16
-!- cosmo [~james@unaffiliated/cosmo] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:23
-!- sy5error [~sy5error@unaffiliated/sy5error] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]21:26
-!- freewil [~freewil@unaffiliated/freewil] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]21:26
zookoamiller: I don't think we can make any reliable predictions or generalizations about this.21:26
zookoBut if you do make some, I want to know!21:26
-!- sy5error_ [~sy5error@unaffiliated/sy5error] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:31
-!- execut3 [~shesek@IGLD-84-228-3-15.inter.net.il] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:35
-!- shesek [~shesek@IGLD-84-228-3-15.inter.net.il] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]21:36
-!- badmofo [~badmofo@ec2-177-71-246-238.sa-east-1.compute.amazonaws.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]21:36
-!- badmofo [~badmofo@ec2-177-71-246-238.sa-east-1.compute.amazonaws.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:36
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EAB34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:37
* leakypat compiles Bitcoin qt for the first time and reflects on what a huge responsibility running the release procedure an official version would be21:52
jgarzikphantomcircuit, amiller: it is false that no one is using namecoin21:54
jgarzikseveral identity projects are building on top of it21:54
phantomcircuitjgarzik, that's not a good idea21:55
phantomcircuitthe codebase is almost entirely unmaintained21:55
CodeSharkleakypat: welcome to the club :)21:56
jgarzikphantomcircuit, also untrue21:56
jgarzikbut whatever.  Spewing falsehoods we wish to be true on this channel is becoming the norm.21:56
amillerhere's joe bonneau's takedown of namecoin http://weis2015.econinfosec.org/papers/WEIS_2015_kalodner.pdf21:57
phantomcircuitjgarzik, i'd bet you serious money i can cripple namecoin in a matter of a few days21:57
phantomcircuitbut doing so is probably a felony21:58
amillerin this channel falsehoods must be spewed in pdf form21:58
jgarzikphantomcircuit, you also claim the ability to cripple bitcoin21:58
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:58
CodeSharkusage isn't really the point - the current design simply is not viable21:59
CodeSharkat least not beyond an experimental research network21:59
CodeSharkthat's just hard math22:00
CodeSharkit's not even controversial to anyone who bothers to make the calculations22:00
CodeSharkbut it's still a cool idea - I hope someone manages to find a way to make something like that viable22:00
CodeSharkit's hardly ever the case with any technology that early prototypes are viable. this space is a little exceptional in seeming to expect that this doesn't apply here22:03
phantomcircuitjgarzik, k22:03
CodeSharkadd to that the fact that the design makes it so that all upgrades to the plane can only be done while in flight...and if you screw up you crash...and...voila!22:04
CodeSharkfun, no? :)22:04
amilleri wish we could learn more from altcoins22:04
amillermaybe there's something to glean from them22:04
amillerbitcoin is still 'small', and so all the altcoins are really small, it's hard to believe there's a lot of signal there as far as what to do and not to do22:05
amillerdoes a crash usually kill those or is it slow atrophy22:05
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@78.179.116.60] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:06
amilleri think (not too sure) no one cares enough about them to have big hard-fork dilemmas22:06
phantomcircuitamiller, slow atrophy22:08
phantomcircuitamiller, the one thing that has been shown to be 100% true is that anything which is available on a liquid market has value regardless of actual utility22:08
phantomcircuitwhich is a neat observation22:08
amilleryeah22:08
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:09
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:16
zookojgarzik: Do you see IRC privmsgs for me? Once upon a time freenode silently silenced my privmsgs to some folks, and I've never trusted it since.22:17
zookojgarzik: from me, that is.22:17
jgarzikzooko, I just responded to your PM.   Lots going on right now and I'm kinda burned out on FUD (not yours, others).22:18
zooko*nod*22:19
-!- Mably [~Mably@unaffiliated/mably] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:20
-!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Quit: Leaving]22:34
-!- jtimon [~quassel@69.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]22:36
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p578EAB34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]22:38
-!- d1ggy [~d1ggy@p20030057E716D962244F4A334D93CDCE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:38
-!- d1ggy_ [~d1ggy@p20030057E7224868B57D32F32017A387.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]22:38
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:40
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has quit [Quit: Bye]22:45
-!- sy5error_ [~sy5error@unaffiliated/sy5error] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]22:51
-!- d1ggy [~d1ggy@p20030057E716D962244F4A334D93CDCE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]22:53
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:57
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:02
-!- droark [~droark@209-6-53-207.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: ZZZzzz…]23:08
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:16
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]23:21
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]23:24
-!- cosmo [~james@unaffiliated/cosmo] has quit [Quit: Leaving]23:25
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]23:26
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Quit: Leaving]23:26
-!- jmcn_ [~jamie@2.24.158.73] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]23:28
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@76-255-129-88.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]23:31
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.73] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:35
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]23:42
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.24.164] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:45
-!- orperelman [~orperelma@bzq-109-67-207-175.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:49
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.73] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]23:54
-!- jmcn [~jamie@2.24.158.73] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:54
-!- gill3s [~gill3s@pat35-3-82-245-143-153.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:57
--- Log closed Wed Jun 24 00:00:30 2015

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!