2015-12-13.log

--- Log opened Sun Dec 13 00:00:35 2015
-!- p15 [~p15@ip-25-214-104-93.static.contabo.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:01
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ovjubesloptmmxff] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]00:01
CubicEarthjl2012: I like you UTXO idea00:03
-!- Erik_dc [~erik@d54C620ED.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:03
-!- CautiousNarwhal [ad03d8c6@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.173.3.216.198] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]00:04
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:06
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-njqunhunyfwcjcub] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:07
CubicEarthI think the least controversial way to go about it would be to only archive UTXOs starting after some future block.  That way it wouldn't be retroactive.00:09
gmaxwellCubicEarth: I don't see why.00:11
gmaxwelland getting rid of the gigabyte of deadweight is probably more important than anything else.00:11
gmaxwellPetertodd actually proposed basically the same idea to litecoin a couple years ago and was supposted to get paid to do it, but decided to drop the contract to focus on other things.00:12
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]00:12
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit []00:13
tulipCubicEarth: a reasonable portion of the UTXO today is junk, heuristically there's a huge amount of outputs which are likely just ASCII text.00:13
jl2012CubicEarth: my proposal makes sure all spendable UTXO are still spendable, even if the signature was made before the softfork. All they need is an archive node to complete the membership proof00:16
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:16
jl2012tulip: also those "you lose" outputs from SatoshiDice00:18
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:18
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]00:19
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:20
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:20
CubicEarthgmaxwell: Only because when a utxo is created today, it is with the assumption that it can be spent in a certain way, which is by creating a transaction of a certain type00:21
-!- raver_edm [~vegas_nig@2602:306:b8e0:8160:95a4:f8cb:4bcb:d950] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:22
gmaxwellCubicEarth: that doesn't change. (well the p2p protocol changes, has changed many times, and will change)00:22
-!- TBI_ [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:24
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]00:25
-!- TBI [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]00:26
CubicEarthgmaxwell: under the proposal, a sender of a dormant utxo has to include - in my own words here - a merkle "map" of where to find utxo in blockchain so that it can be readily found and verified.  That's an extra requirement.  But let me just be clear:  The extra step doesn't bother me at all... I was just trying to anticipate criticism from the more ideological people in the community.00:26
gmaxwellIt's not actually an extra requirement though.00:28
gmaxwellConsider, say you have a private key. Can you create a transaction using that? No. You need a map to the coins assigned to it.00:28
gmaxwellCan you get that map from a p2p bitcoin node? No.00:29
gmaxwellYou have to either run a full node yourself, or consult some special public index.00:29
gmaxwellWhich is exactly the same thing jl2012's writeup needs... just it would send a bit more data.00:29
CubicEarthgmaxwell: What's a p2p node that isn't a full node?00:38
CubicEarthspv?00:39
CubicEarthor...?00:39
CodeSharkwe need new terminology :)00:39
CodeSharkthe concept of a "full node" is becoming less and less meaningful00:39
tulipin the original Satoshi code a "node" is one which is mining.00:39
tulip"To support the network by running a node, select: Options->Generate Coins"00:40
gmaxwellCubicEarth: where did you get "isn't a full node"?00:41
CodeSharkwe have at least two orthogonal dimensions here: full/partial validation and complete/pruned history00:41
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:42
gmaxwellCubicEarth: no node speaking the bitcoin protocol will act as a blockchain index server.00:42
CodeSharkand mining was pulled out of nodes a long time ago00:42
tulip2015-12-13 08:42:57 BitcoinMiner started00:43
tulip2015-12-13 08:42:57 Running BitcoinMiner with 7 transactions in block (5305 bytes)00:43
CodeSharktulip: Bitcoin Core still has a built-in miner...but it's only really useful for testnet and regtest00:44
moait's a natural splintering into specialised layers what the original prototype client did wholistically00:44
CubicEarthgmaxwell: I thought you were contrasting a "p2p bitcoin node" with a "full node", but I might have misunderstood.00:44
CubicEarthmoa: yes.  It's great to watch.00:45
CodeSharksatoshi's model consisted of two types of nodes - full nodes and SPV nodes...and only the details for the former were really spelled out - and it served its purpose...it was a great proof-of-concept using simplifying assumptions00:46
CodeSharkbut it was really a prototype :)00:47
CodeSharknow we need to drop some of the simplifying assumptions and work more towards a layered architecture00:47
gmaxwellCubicEarth: you misunderstood. :)00:47
-!- Erik_dc [~erik@d54C620ED.access.telenet.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]00:49
CodeSharkin the end, a "full bitcoin node" makes about as much sense as a "full Internet node"00:50
CodeSharkin particular, the word "full" is superfluous at best and inaccurate at worst, depending on interpretation ;)00:51
CubicEarthWe need a nomenclature committee00:53
CodeSharkit's interesting to note that in the satoshi white paper, the term "full network node" is only used once...in the SPV section00:53
gmaxwellthis is all a tangent.00:53
gmaxwellbecause, even the fullest of full nodes, won't provide over the network the service cubicearth's assumptions required of them.00:54
-!- Jeremy_Rand [~jeremy@ip68-97-45-209.ok.ok.cox.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]00:56
CodeSharkI'm not familiar with CubicEarth's assumptions, but in any case the terminology is confusing00:57
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@n182z6l196.static.ctm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:57
CubicEarthCodeShark: gmaxwell: I'm not sure I am familiar with my own assumptions, to be honest00:58
gmaxwellheh00:58
-!- Jeremy_Rand [~jeremy@ip68-97-45-209.ok.ok.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:01
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:03
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has quit [Client Quit]01:03
CodeSharkif I could redesign Bitcoin from scratch with the benefit of hindsight, I'd define the consensus layer solely by cryptographic commitment structures independent of network messages and network serializations01:07
CodeSharkwith the objective of enabling short, efficient proofs01:08
CodeSharkand allow for potentially more than one network protocol for message propagation and synchronization01:09
CodeSharki.e. with git you can use http, ftp, ssh, etc...01:09
tulipyou can definitely understand why Bitcoins P2P network is built the way it is though, it evolved rather than being defined.01:09
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@n182z6l196.static.ctm.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]01:11
-!- Jeremy_Rand is now known as Jeremy_Rand_201:12
-!- Jeremy_Rand_2 is now known as Jeremy_Rand01:12
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:12
CubicEarthCodeShark: would say the relaynetwork is an example of an "network protocol for message propagation and synchronization"?01:13
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@z113l3.static.ctm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:13
CodeSharksure, why not?01:13
tulipit was pretty late in the design that the block header gained a version for example, they used to be 76 bytes long.01:13
CubicEarthCodeShark: I agree.01:14
CodeSharkbitcoin started out as an academic proof-of-concept...and academic project implementations tend to largely ignore long-term extensibility and maintainability concerns because they are really designed to demonstrate an abstract idea01:15
CodeSharknot to build a platform upon which an entire global industry can operate01:16
CodeSharkusually, if the idea works, later on other people figure out how to implement it in more practical ways - problem with Bitcoin is it can't simply be restarted without disenfranchising early adopters01:17
CodeSharkand now it's even more complicated because any such attempt is likely to splinter the effort01:18
CodeSharkit's a prototype aircraft that must be upgraded while in flight and can never land01:20
tulipI don't think it is presented like that, the first unreleased version maybe, but later on it is clearly designed to be a real-world system.01:21
CodeShark"presented to be" yes - "designed to be" not so much01:21
CodeSharkthe catch is that to demonstrate this idea a real currency had to be created01:22
CodeSharkwhich de facto turned it into a real-world system01:22
-!- Jeremy_Rand_2 [~user@ip68-97-45-209.ok.ok.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:24
CubicEarthWell in some respects, yes it was, considering the address space, the number of satoshis, were very generous in their resolution.  But in other respects I can see your point.01:24
tulipCubicEarth: in the 2008 source code there's considerably less precision.01:25
CubicEarthOh yeah?01:25
gmaxwellyes it was originally cent resolution.01:26
gmaxwellthe 21e6 bitcoin limit comes from the size of a signed integer.01:26
-!- Jeremy_Rand [~jeremy@ip68-97-45-209.ok.ok.cox.net] has left #bitcoin-wizards ["Konversation terminated!"]01:26
gmaxwellIt's the limit arising from highest 'round number' of coin per block reward that will fit into an unsigned int with cent resolution.01:27
ajgmaxwell: you mean a signed int?01:29
gmaxwellI said it right the first time. :P01:30
tulipaj: it's signed, that's why an underflow of the value created billions of coins in 2009.01:30
ajgmaxwell: ahh, taking a bet both ways. clever!01:30
gmaxwell"spread spectrum"01:31
gmaxwellI've noticed when talking lately I've said one when I meant the other.01:31
gmaxwellbut when coding, I don't think I've ever made an error like that. werid.01:32
CodeSharkI think satoshi was the other way around :p01:32
CubicEarthgmaxwell: what is/was the absolute highest value of that signed int?01:32
CodeShark2^63 - 101:33
tulipCubicEarth: unsigned.01:33
gmaxwellint, not long. :)  2^31 -1 :)01:33
aj2^31-1 gives 21.47483648 *100 million01:34
ajgmaxwell: int, not long long ym :)01:34
gmaxwell(LP64 forever!)01:34
CodeSharklol - even the C language has its design flaws :p01:36
CodeSharkmixing application level stuff with hardware-specific stuff01:36
ajthey're not flaws, they're implementation defined features01:36
CodeSharkin principle, an "int" should be whatever integer datatype is best supported natively by the architecture, IMO...and we should be specific when we require a certain width01:37
gmaxwell(2^31-1) implies 51.1305 coins per block, if there is cent resolution, with bitcoin's inflation schedule.01:37
CodeSharkwe should not rely on "int" being a specific width01:39
CubicEarthI had though the 21-Million had to do with the exponentially decreasing reward series.  But the series was 'targeted' at 21 million after the fact, it seems by setting the having every 210,000 blocks.01:39
CodeSharkunless we are writing specifically for a certain architecture and portability is not really a concern01:39
CubicEarthhaving every 190,000 blocks would probably yield 19,000,000 coins, i'm guessing01:40
ajCodeShark: int being "whatever's fast" makes sense if you're recompiling code on new hardware and living with whatever the hardware's limits are, not so much if you want programs on different hardware to interoperate01:44
CodeSharkright - as long as you're well below the overflow...or for things like pointer arithmetic...it makes sense to just use ints. but if your datatype specifically requires n bits it is bad style to rely on the hardware specs, IMO...and it's far better to have a library of datatypes of specific width implemented optimally for the specific hardware01:46
CubicEarthA formal specification would help a lot.  Maybe there should be two - an economic specification, and a technical one01:49
CodeSharkCubicEarth: Σ τ(ri * 2^(-k)), k = [0, ∞01:49
CodeSharkCubicEarth: Σ τ(ri * 2^(-k)), k = [0, ∞)01:49
CubicEarthCodeShark: Nice!01:50
gmaxwellCubicEarth: in this space specifications are mostly useful as retorical tools.01:50
CodeSharkwhere ri is the initial block reward and τ is the halving integral01:50
CodeSharkerr01:50
CodeSharkhalving interval01:50
gmaxwellBecause at the end of the day what _counts_ is what the network does; not what some dirty woodpulp says.01:50
gmaxwellAnd if something is right to do, it's right to do on its own merits; not because some dirty woodpulp says so.01:51
gmaxwellOr wrong to do.01:51
gmaxwellNow specs can be useful to help level set-- but _documentation_ in general does that, and we have a bunch of that (though need much more)01:51
CodeSharkΣ τ(ri * 2^(-k)) = τ*ri Σ 2^(-k) = 2τ*ri :)01:52
CubicEarthwell perhaps just the economic spec then.01:52
Luke-JrCubicEarth: like https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Prohibited_changes ?01:53
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]01:54
CodeSharkit's sorta funny looking at that document in light of the events of the last several months01:56
CodeSharkchanges that affect costs of running nodes also have economic impact01:57
Luke-JrCodeShark: it's a wiki, update it ;)01:57
CubicEarthsomething like that, but I was imagining something much more formalized.  It's be interesting to see just how widespread the agreement would be around such a document, and how to measure such agreement.01:57
CodeSharkarguably even more short-term economic impact than, say, increasing the asymptotic limit of issued bitcoins01:58
-!- RoboTedd_ [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:00
CubicEarthIt would be from the users perspective... what they want and expect in their financial system.02:01
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@z113l3.static.ctm.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]02:01
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@n182z6l196.static.ctm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:02
CubicEarthand the goal of the tech would be to serve those interests02:02
gmaxwellcodeshark: yea, a change to subsidy = max(subsidy, 1.0 btc) would have no direct effect for a great many years... but woah would it have an effect now.02:03
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:04
CodeSharkI think more important than the enduser's perspective are the economic and security properties of the system and how well the system can be maintained and improved02:04
CodeSharkif done right, endusers shouldn't even have to know anything ;)02:04
-!- RoboTedd_ [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]02:05
CodeSharki.e. if the system cannot be self-sustaining economically...or can be subverted by hostile entities...it's probably not a good thing :)02:07
CubicEarthCodeShark: You could almost say that about the current financial system... most end users don't know anything about it, yet they are getting deceived and ripped off by a very sophisticated financial apparatus02:07
moathey perceive a net benefit or they would disengage02:08
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:09
gmaxwellBenefits come in many shapes and sizes.02:09
* gmaxwell points to the existance of smokers: a product that provably kills its users, but slowly enough that its still widely used02:10
CodeSharkgmaxwell: makes a salient point...bitcoin should be designed such that failures are immediate and containable :)02:11
CubicEarthmoa: in the current financial system there isn't much of an alternative, yet :) , and in monopoly situations there isn't much choice.  As for disengaging with bitcoin, currently bitcoin has many benefits to offer relative to its surroundings, but as the system matures, it will have to adopt finer-grained social optimizations to keep it's standing or to grow very very large.02:12
CubicEarthmoa: I'm not disagreeing though02:12
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:18
-!- runeks [sid21167@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-zgsgralqsgcbwxzt] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]02:18
-!- runeks [sid21167@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dmjrogaobkbnvujy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:19
CubicEarthThink about a body of law (the kind a state has, written with words) that centered around the Bitcoin economic model.  There is clearly an economic theory the white paper and code point.  What would it sound like to have that formalized, in English (or other) and with equations.  Not with computer code.02:20
CubicEarth"The total number of Bitcoins shall not exceed 21,000,000"02:21
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:22
CubicEarth"A Bitcoin is composed of 100 million subunits"02:22
gmaxwellwait, what if we the people want to increase the precision?02:22
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:23
CubicEarthThey could change the spec02:23
CubicEarth(and then the code)02:23
gmaxwellbut the spec would mostly be used as a retorical device to argue for or against changes. thats like ... all it would actually be used for. :)02:23
-!- kumavis [sid13576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vhoadetbncwaddfs] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:24
-!- btcdrak [uid115429@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-sgzicjiphxigkbmd] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:24
-!- corb is now known as JackH02:25
-!- ibrightly [sid113387@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-bqtepjtmuzfggipy] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]02:25
-!- Toxodont_ [sid110179@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kcoyxecuncumzchd] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:25
-!- licnep [uid4387@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ofmxbmjxalyykyvb] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:25
CubicEarthYes.  It would be helpful for non-technical people to understand the basis for their money.  A large institution could hire a technical person and ask them if the code did what the spec sheet said.02:25
-!- mikolalysenko [sid34553@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-nvcherpwaevurtux] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]02:25
-!- dasource [uid48409@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-sbzrxfjtjmvihsfl] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:25
-!- Xzibit17 [sid50165@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-bffqsyvwynoewztv] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]02:25
-!- artifexd [sid28611@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vvyjzqmhscuxbrpa] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]02:25
gmaxwellI'm just saying, writing in details that aren't actually important would only create drama.02:25
-!- runeks [sid21167@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dmjrogaobkbnvujy] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:26
CubicEarthYes, retorical in the sense that people would use it to communicate with each other to gain a better understanding of the world around them :)02:26
-!- alexkuck_ [sid117875@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-buzcvlzwaswlpnvj] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:26
-!- zmanian_ [sid113594@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-sskeiezucgcweaqb] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:26
-!- jlyndon [sid10913@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-cmgsrhhvyykrhrnx] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:26
-!- prosody [sid32673@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-lscaxjxwobjhttql] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:26
gmaxwellI think the precision is a technical detail, which better not matter economically.02:26
-!- adams__ [sid73416@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-myohlmhnqpymkffp] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:26
CubicEarthMaybe the spec sheet should say02:26
CubicEarth...02:26
CubicEarth"And each bitcoin shall have enough units too do x....."02:27
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:27
-!- CodeShark [sid126576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ohvqqvnuicdybeeq] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]02:27
-!- bitkarma [sid124593@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-usnufbcclwwnyquv] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]02:27
CubicEarthPeople like things to read02:27
-!- mariorz [sid490@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tsyadxcgrixeaach] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:28
CubicEarthHelps them to understand stuff02:28
-!- jbenet [sid17552@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dsvurpjyhklbycqm] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:28
-!- PsychoticBoy [sid27029@pdpc/supporter/active/psychoticboy] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]02:28
CubicEarthOr to help answer this question02:29
-!- robmyers [sid75499@gnu/social/robmyers] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]02:29
-!- mappum [sid43795@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fdnszqbmkdxeovbf] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]02:29
CubicEarth"As a user, what can I expect from bitcoin?"  (sorry I keep hitting return by accident between lines)02:29
-!- lomax__ [sid52157@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gmdqresgijaxioth] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:29
-!- bassguitarman [sid40024@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-univssspdrqzwjzu] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]02:30
-!- jlyndon [sid10913@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xmnujlebtxjlyxrw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:31
-!- SheffieldCrypto_ [sid28532@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ixvvixztcwehvlpr] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:32
-!- artifexd [sid28611@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-nsfupxmhkljerjrr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:32
Luke-JrCubicEarth: "nothing. it's an experiment."02:33
-!- wpalczynski [sid55851@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kvnclxwinjwevjkr] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:33
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]02:34
-!- Toxodont_ [sid110179@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-oncuhubdotxejkaj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:36
-!- CodeShark [~textual@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:37
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:37
-!- artifexd [sid28611@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-nsfupxmhkljerjrr] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:37
-!- jlyndon [sid10913@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xmnujlebtxjlyxrw] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]02:40
jannes__I sent an email to dev mailing list the other day about Segregated IBLT. Kalle Rosenbaum politely pointed to the flaw in my thinking. The idea was to save a few bytes by reducing the redundancy slightly for only the signatures but not the naked transactions.02:40
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:40
jannes__Would it make sense to use k=3 for naked transaction slices, but k=2 for signatuture slices? (k being number of hashes performed on each slice)02:40
CubicEarthLuke-Jr: That's either a tounge-in-cheek or cynical02:41
CubicEarthI can't tell02:41
-!- Toxodont_ [sid110179@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-oncuhubdotxejkaj] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]02:42
CubicEarthUnless you consider everything to be an experiment, at some point Bitcoin will stop being experimental and become 'normal' or 'stable' or whatever you want to call something when it is no longer experimental.02:42
jannes__CubicEarth: I've never seen him non-serious.02:42
-!- mariorz [sid490@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dyyilexsvqrzpmrt] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:42
-!- wpalczynski [sid55851@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-otbxjbrersacdfui] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:42
-!- bitkarma [sid124593@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-wzksljhbfbftsezp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:43
Luke-JrCubicEarth: at some point, Bitcoin *may* stop being experimental; but we're far from that point today still02:43
Luke-Jrjannes__: I'm quite often less than 100% serious ;)02:43
-!- licnep [uid4387@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mcmlxiysqyqlxxyc] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:43
CubicEarthLuke-Jr: That may be true, but that does not mean users should expect 'nothing'02:44
-!- PsychoticBoy [sid27029@pdpc/supporter/active/psychoticboy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:44
-!- mappum [sid43795@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mefqzjnwnpkpqeyu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:44
CodeSharkperhaps it would be better to ask app developers rather than users02:44
Luke-JrCubicEarth: what exactly do you think they can expect? there are no guarantees. everything is an experiment available as-is.02:45
CubicEarthLuke-Jr: Everything, or bitcoin as it is today02:45
CubicEarth?02:45
-!- kumavis [sid13576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-cxebqlzihpyhetml] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:45
-!- robmyers [sid75499@gnu/social/robmyers] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:45
-!- jbenet [sid17552@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-aeaeizojtgrgjkde] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:45
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]02:45
-!- runeks [sid21167@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gvjbntktthdlsmec] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:45
Luke-JrCubicEarth: I wouldn't even promise 0.12.0 won't have a bug that loses all its users' bitcoins02:45
-!- Xzibit17 [sid50165@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mcododusorikabhj] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:45
Luke-JrI mean, it's unlikely.. but it's not impossible.02:45
jannes__Luke-Jr: my conclusion came from lack of data. :)02:45
-!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@75-175-72-226.ptld.qwest.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]02:46
-!- alexkuck_ [sid117875@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ogzbjhzlywsnmplk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:46
-!- CodeShark_ [uid126576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-saclfdnhbfpddign] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:46
-!- dasource [uid48409@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rnednvonmmougvkp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:47
CubicEarthLuke-Jr: It's not even about any software that you may or may not write.  The can expect there to be a limit of 21m coins, for instance, with the software they have today.  That is not an expectation of you.02:47
-!- ibrightly [sid113387@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gmjmtumpogxzbtwg] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:47
jannes__CubicEarth: It would probably be better if they would expect 'nothing'. Judging by the trolling on reddit and forums, a lot of them already expect to be millionaires before 2016 is out.02:47
Luke-JrCubicEarth: okay, I concede that expectation is reasonable.02:48
-!- mikolalysenko [sid34553@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kwoqwcnztbqtcupm] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:49
-!- prosody [sid32673@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-zaitblpxiawewrou] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:49
CubicEarthLuke-Jr: Are there any other reasonable expectations?  Or is that the only one?02:49
-!- zmanian_ [sid113594@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-azexdphkhiefqzqh] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:50
-!- bassguitarman [sid40024@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tdxbvyvvhpdrdsma] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:50
-!- adams__ [sid73416@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xogriaoubganlnux] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:50
-!- lomax__ [sid52157@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ermahoqwjguhejyg] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:50
-!- SheffieldCrypto_ [sid28532@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-jokakpfhsirmoktx] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:51
CodeSharkit's a rather superficial expectation, IMHO, from the perspective of an end user - it's just an arbitrary number. a more profound expectation is something along the lines of "nobody can unilaterally decide to inflate the money supply nor counterfeit coins"02:51
Luke-JrCubicEarth: not adding things like demurrage seems like a reasonable expectation also - but I don't know if it's a good one02:51
-!- jlyndon [sid10913@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-etapimwbdnrejcft] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:51
-!- Toxodont_ [sid110179@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fqpnqpfobiqppkmb] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:52
-!- artifexd [sid28611@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rifpgxarymdcofrx] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:53
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:53
-!- btcdrak_ [uid115429@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-lplwilrleoijurdp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:53
-!- btcdrak_ is now known as btcdrak02:53
-!- btcdrak [uid115429@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-lplwilrleoijurdp] has quit [Client Quit]02:53
CubicEarthLuke-Jr: do you think that demurrage could be a more efficient way to pay for security in the future?02:54
Luke-JrCubicEarth: it also means UTXOs effectively pay rent on their database entry02:55
Luke-Jrright now that's no cost02:55
CubicEarthLuke-Jr: yes.02:55
CodeSharkthey should pay rent by the square foot…not by how much gold rests atop that square foot :)02:56
CubicEarthCodeShark: Yes.02:56
Luke-Jrbut someone did recently post an alternate idea to the dev ML that can make them no longer no-cost, without demurrage02:56
CubicEarthCodeShark: so by the square foot, not the CubicFoot02:56
-!- btcdrak [uid115429@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-wkiupwvmmmnghymy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:56
CodeSharkconvert to your unit of choice :p02:57
Luke-JrCodeShark: it's harder to figure logic for that02:57
CodeSharkLuke-Jr: yes, the mechanism is tricky but the incentive structure is better :)02:58
CubicEarthThe idea that "no one should be able to freeze a users funds" is an interesting one.02:58
CodeSharkthat one requires qualification in light of multiuser scripts ;)02:59
jannes__What Luke-Jr is referring to, sounds pretty good:  http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011952.html02:59
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:00
CubicEarthjannes__: Yes.  It is a simple, seemingly solid plan.03:00
gmaxwelljl2012's scheme is a reinvention of Petertodd's STXO, I must remind.03:01
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:01
jannes__gmaxwell: yeah you mentioned that there :)03:01
CodeSharkdid the STXO proposal specifically mention only requiring this for outputs that are at least of some particular age?03:05
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]03:05
CodeSharkif so I hadn't heard of that part03:06
jannes__gmaxwell: BTW respect for how much patience you have with trolls. It's good for other readers, even if the trolls refuse to want to understand. Too bad that the downvoting hides so much of it.03:06
gmaxwelljannes__: thanks; that's why I do it.03:07
-!- justice [~textual@HSI-KBW-46-223-37-131.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]03:07
gmaxwellGood to hear that it's helpful from someone.03:08
-!- p15 [~p15@ip-25-214-104-93.static.contabo.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]03:08
CodeSharkgmaxwell: at risk of repeating myself too many times, you really should publish more well-edited stuff in places that are easier for people to find so that those who are interested don't have to read through all the trollage to find it ;)03:08
jannes__gmaxwell: Yeah absolutely is. I learn from it too. And I upvote where I can. The 1st few times you talked about quitting Bitcoin if XT takes over my heart skipped a few beats. But I totally agree with you. Please PM me, so I can sell the few coins I have. :)03:11
CodeSharkso correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems petertodd's innovation is placing the burden of proving existence/unspentness on the sender by committing to a TXO tree…and jl2012's innovation is only making this a requirement for outputs beyond a certain age03:11
gmaxwellCodeShark: petertodd also proposed having a size limited utxo.03:12
gmaxwelljl2012 suggests age, PT was suggesting that it just be FIFO and a fixed size.03:12
CubicEarthgmaxwell: utxo or utxo set?03:12
gmaxwellCubicEarth: always assume the thing that makes some sense? :) (the latter)03:13
jannes__gmaxwell: In light of what CodeShark just said. I saw you mentioning StackExchange the other day and you didn't seem eager to join. Is that some (non) open source/wikipedia experience reason? Or just not interested in yet another account? I must say I find it one of the best resources for FAQs. Mostly because it's indexed so well by google.03:13
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:14
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:14
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]03:17
CodeSharkgmaxwell: the FIFO thing makes the UTXO size constant…but it incurs more overhead in commitments (although perhaps amortizing this cost along the lines of what bramc has proposed could make it significantly less costly)03:18
gmaxwellwell, it could always be 'quantized fifo'... e.g. expire a big chunk at a time.03:19
gmaxwellBut if the size is small, the commitment scheme is cheap.03:19
CodeSharkthe other problem I see with it is that it makes it harder for thin nodes to know when the full proof is required03:20
CodeSharkI suppose blocks could commit to the UTXO delta or something03:21
CodeSharkthat is, how many net UTXO were created by the block03:21
gmaxwellwell, you could always just commit to how high (block height) the UTXO covers.03:21
CodeSharkyes, that too03:21
CodeSharkbut that's essentially jl2012's proposal using a dynamic min age03:22
Luke-JrI wonder if there's a way to do STXO without consensus rules determining when they are required03:22
Luke-Jreg, make that a matter of policy03:22
CodeSharkit could be done - relay nodes could be queried to see whether they have a utxo…one more roundtrip in i/o03:23
CodeSharkbut then we need the TXO commitment tree to always be current03:24
gmaxwellLuke-Jr: well technically the utxo depth could be peer to peer negoiated.03:25
gmaxwelle.g. if you have a small utxo, and a proof, but I have a big one, you clould just not send the proof to me.03:25
gmaxwellBut going the other direction requires generating a proof, which needs extra data.03:26
CodeSharkalso, the negotiation isn't necessarily transitive :)03:26
CodeSharkwhat if the relay requires multiple hops?03:26
CodeSharkthat would mean the higher utxo node would have to construct a proof03:26
CodeSharkand the incentive structure starts to get more complex03:27
CodeSharkfor relay, the node could just use the policy of the smallest utxo node it is connected to, I suppose03:29
CodeSharkthe sender has a clear incentive to get the tx propagated…but the relayer might require a fee in order to add a proof03:30
gmaxwellIf it always had the data to construct the proof then it would be no big deal.03:31
gmaxwellAlas, thats extra data.03:31
gmaxwellI suppose though someone who has all the data you could at least omit them.03:31
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:34
-!- ttttemp [~ttttemp@pc-10236.ethz.ch] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]03:34
-!- s1w- [~s1w@128.199.100.16] has quit [Changing host]03:34
-!- s1w- [~s1w@unaffiliated/someoneweird] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:34
-!- s1w- is now known as s1w03:34
CodeSharkin principle I like making these kinds of things a matter of policy…but in practice we need a way to provide direct monetary incentives, I think03:35
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]03:35
CodeSharkthere should be direct incentives for storing a large utxo as it cuts down on bandwidth requirements03:36
CodeSharkbut it shouldn't be a requirement to run a relay node03:37
-!- ttttemp [~ttttemp@pc-5305.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:38
CodeSharkhowever, it's not just a bandwidth/space tradeoff…such proofs also allow for greater granularity in partial validation03:38
CodeSharkyou could get security between SPV and full validation03:39
CodeSharki.e. nodes that are only interested in relaying certain kinds of transactions…or only interested in monitoring certain transactions03:39
moagold stars and a jelly bean if there's no tears03:43
moaoops03:44
gmaxwellCodeShark: I tihnk it would be super useful to communicate your minrelayfee.03:47
gmaxwelllike, why are people spamming you with crap you're just going to drop.03:47
-!- SgtStroopwafel [~Chuck@s5597aba6.adsl.online.nl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]03:47
-!- Terry4 [~Terry4@garza.riseup.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]03:47
gmaxwellI was thinking about how that could be handled transitively.. but the schemes I came up with all suffered from any cycles in the graph pinning state.03:48
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Quit: Leaving]03:49
gmaxwelle.g. what a node says it will relay is the max(self,min(other peers will relay)).03:49
-!- SgtStroopwafel [~Chuck@s5597aba6.adsl.online.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:50
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]03:55
CodeSharkif the sender sends directly to the recipient and it's the recipient's responsibility to get it propagated, there could be other interesting types of negotiation03:58
CodeSharki.e. someone who receives a large number of transactions might have an incentive to store a large utxo04:00
-!- Terry4 [~Terry4@2605:e000:4ddb:7300:916:cf47:4352:2de6] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:01
-!- jannes__ [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has quit [Quit: Leaving]04:01
CodeSharkin general, senders only really need to maintain proofs for their own utxos assuming they are ok with less-than-full-validator security04:02
CodeSharkregardless of incentive structure specifics, it's a good idea to design the commitment structures to afford a lot of flexibility in these matters04:04
CodeSharkthe incentive structures can arise over time…especially as we improve upon 2nd layer protocols04:05
-!- tulip [~tulip@unaffiliated/tulip] has quit [Quit: tulip]04:20
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:21
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]04:22
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]04:24
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:24
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]04:28
-!- dasource [uid48409@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rnednvonmmougvkp] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]04:30
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:32
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:44
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]04:49
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f11db5b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:54
-!- Piper-Off is now known as Monthrect05:13
-!- licnep [uid4387@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mcmlxiysqyqlxxyc] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]05:16
-!- fkhan [weechat@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-fjinjzkztxjhdlob] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]05:17
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.10.241] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]05:18
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:20
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Client Quit]05:22
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:24
-!- MoALTz [~no@78-11-180-214.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]05:26
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.10.241] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:29
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]05:29
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:49
-!- MoALTz [~no@78-11-180-214.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:49
-!- MoALTz_ [~no@78-11-180-214.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:52
-!- MoALTz [~no@78-11-180-214.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]05:55
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:57
-!- rustyn [~rustyn@unaffiliated/rustyn] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:08
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:10
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]06:10
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]06:14
-!- CodeShark [~textual@cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: Goodbye]06:20
-!- CodeShark_ is now known as CodeShark06:20
-!- fkhan [weechat@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-thnermlnmhejccyp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:26
-!- fkhan [weechat@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-thnermlnmhejccyp] has quit [Changing host]06:26
-!- fkhan [weechat@unaffiliated/loteriety] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:26
-!- fkhan [weechat@unaffiliated/loteriety] has quit [Changing host]06:26
-!- fkhan [weechat@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-thnermlnmhejccyp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:26
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]06:40
-!- tromp [~tromp@24.190.11.216] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:40
-!- tromp [~tromp@24.190.11.216] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]06:45
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:56
-!- davec [~davec@cpe-24-243-251-52.hot.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:58
-!- LeMiner2 [LeMiner@5ED1AFBF.cm-7-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:58
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]07:00
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]07:00
-!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-45-58-251-147.dyn.295.ca] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:07
-!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-45-58-251-147.dyn.295.ca] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]07:08
-!- ttttemp [~ttttemp@pc-5305.ethz.ch] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]07:11
-!- ttttemp_ [~ttttemp@pc-10236.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:11
-!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-45-58-251-147.dyn.295.ca] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:12
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:17
-!- sparetire_ [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:20
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:27
-!- bramc [~bram@99-75-88-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:29
-!- Myagui [Myagui@shell.xshellz.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]07:42
-!- jcorgan|away is now known as jcorgan07:46
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:49
-!- seg [~seg@fsf/member/seg] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]07:56
-!- seg [~seg@fsf/member/seg] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:57
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]08:03
-!- smk [5e663891@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.102.56.145] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:16
-!- MoALTz_ [~no@78-11-180-214.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]08:19
-!- MoALTz_ [~no@78-11-180-214.static.ip.netia.com.pl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:20
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:21
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:22
-!- MoALTz_ is now known as MoALTz08:26
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:45
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]08:50
-!- bramc [~bram@99-75-88-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]08:50
-!- ManfredMacx [~hyperion@93-136-57-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:02
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]09:05
-!- Quent [~Quent@unaffiliated/quent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:07
QuentNot sure if this is the right chan, but I couldn't find a better one. I was wondering whether there is any concrete reason why no one has tried forking the bitcoin chain with the aim of creating a concurrent chain, rather than creating a new coin with a new genesis block.09:09
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]09:09
-!- coinoperated_tv [~coinopera@c-73-163-103-87.hsd1.dc.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]09:09
alpalpQuent: I believe that has happened on some alt-coins.09:10
Quentthere have been tons of altcoins and everyone seems to have tried plenty of things, but did no one think to just fork bitcoin itself (prob quite unlikely) or am I missing something?09:10
Quentand how did that go alpalp ?09:11
alpalpIIRC Feathercoin did it from litecoin09:11
Quentyeah, I haven't looked much into feathercoin, but it still "lives", I think, so I suppose there isn't anything technically or fundamentally wrong in the sense that it would make algochanged forking unworkable?09:13
Quentso then why did everyone decide to start with a new genesis block and not one with a forked chain?09:13
smkwhere is the profit in forking if you cant scoup up any premine09:13
alpalpQuent: since the vast majority of altcoins are just get rich schemes, that doesn't work well if you can't premine a bunch and sell to rubes.09:14
Quentwas litecoin pre-mined?09:14
MRL-Relay[tacotime] Quent: Google "NameCoin"09:14
smkbitcoin client is open source so you can (and many do) run versions with patched and subtle changes to their wallets09:14
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]09:14
Quentyou'd think that any fork of bitcoin would be far superior to litecoin due to the in-built network effects, so making it worth quite a bit early on, but also easily minable, ergo profits09:15
Quentproblem is obviously current btc holders can sell it to death...09:16
QuentI mean, it would be free money09:16
alpalpQuent: you are assuming alt-coins are created for reasons other than trying to get free money.09:16
MRL-Relay[tacotime] NameCoin was the first blockchain that was merge-mined with Bitcoin and one of the earliest alt coins too.09:16
-!- TBI [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:17
-!- smak [5e663891@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.102.56.145] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:17
MRL-Relay[tacotime] alpalp: Yeah, Satoshi had a good model.09:17
Quentalpalp, some altcoins seem to have unique propositions, such as faster tx times (regardless of the merits) and higher privacy such as monero etc09:17
Quenta forked bitcoinchain would basically be a sidechain but with no ability to go back09:18
sipaQuent: an altcoin by definition resets the network effect... why does it matter whether you fork bitcoin or something else (there are good reasons for using bitcoin's codebase, but network effect seems.to be not one of them)09:18
alpalpQuent: Agreed, but if you can create one where you can benefit, or other people benefit, which are you going to create?09:18
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-npfishiefvnaulah] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:18
-!- TBI_ [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]09:18
alpalpsipa: if you can distribute coins to a wider number of people in a "fair" way, it may trigger usage.  PayPal gave away free money to get going for example.09:18
Quentalpalp, if it was my choice, I'd prob want bitcoin's network effect09:18
-!- smk [5e663891@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.102.56.145] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]09:19
-!- smak is now known as smk09:19
Quentobviously that network effect would diminish every day the fork goes on, but I just find it curious no one has even tried, making me wonder whether the idea itself is unworkable09:20
alpalpQuent: that would assume Bitcoin users would find it useful, and the initial dump phase might make that an issue.09:20
alpalpQuent: If someone did that, I would dump my free alt-coins for whatever price I could get.  I imagine quite a lot of others do the same.09:21
Quentwell, it would depend wouldn't it09:21
Quentif the forkcoin is clearly a looser then sure, but if it has at least one decent ups you'd expect the vast majority to hold out09:21
Quentthere would be some complex games for sure, but my point is why has no one even tried09:22
alpalpIt would depend if it were superior money or not.  Thats the only thing I would judge it on.  And I find it highly unlikely that it would be superior, and even if it were, its changes would have to be made in a way it would be completely incompatible with Bitcoin and could not be merged in.09:22
MRL-Relay[tacotime] Quent: Forking the blockchain/reusing the UTXO set has happened too, see Peter R's spinoffs (BCT) or Stellar.09:23
QuentI was just reading that thread MRL-Relay, haven't finished it yet09:23
Quentbut, for example, zerocoin could be a fork of bitcoin...09:24
Quentrather than a new genesis, if it s possible for it to be a fork of course09:24
Quentin that situation I don't think you'd just sell it because you would not know of it's value, so probably the vast majority would hold out09:25
MRL-Relay[tacotime] That's basically the logic between the sidechains series of alt coins, except using a new blockchain and pegging to tokens.09:25
alpalpQuent: The value would almost always be 0, and anyone paying more would be giving me free money09:26
Quentfeathercoin isn't valued at 009:27
alpalpIf you gave me feathercoin, I would sell all of it as fast as I could.09:28
Quentbut yeah, there is a free money aspect09:28
QuentI mean, in many ways it is a huge pre-mine09:28
alpalpso as long as someone will pay me anything for it09:28
MRL-Relay[tacotime] (this is more #cryptocurrency)09:29
Quentbut I wouldn't sell a zeroforcoin for example09:29
Quentand MRL-Relay, I don't think so, it isn't much different than sidechains09:29
alpalpsidechains can come back home09:30
Quentexcept that sidechains allow you to go back09:30
MRL-Relay[tacotime] No I mean, this channel is usually for discussion of papers or math09:30
Quentyeah09:30
Quentwell, no other discussion is happening right now...09:30
alpalpThat doesn't mean we should discuss the score of some football games going on in here.09:31
Quentit does mean you can just ignore and not take part in the discussion as would be the case if the discussion was score games09:31
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:31
Quentbut, anyway09:32
Quentif you want to go back to dead chan that's cool09:32
MRL-Relay[tacotime] Quent: s/n is tried to be kept high here because a number of the people reading scrollback work in the field and try to keep up with everything going on from an academic perspective, it's hard when it gets cluttered09:32
QuentI just thought it was an interesting topic09:32
Quentfor the wizzards09:32
alpalpAnd you are being told repeatedly its off topic for this chan.09:32
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]09:36
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Quit: laurentmt]09:36
-!- wangchun [~wangchun@li414-193.members.linode.com] has quit [Quit: leaving]09:46
-!- gwillen is now known as gwillen|testing09:50
-!- gwillen|testing is now known as gwillen09:50
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:56
-!- wangchun [~wangchun@li414-193.members.linode.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:00
-!- gwillen is now known as gwillen|testing10:02
-!- gwillen|testing is now known as gwillen10:02
-!- gwillen is now known as gwillen-testing10:03
-!- gwillen-testing is now known as gwillen10:03
-!- Toxodont_ [sid110179@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fqpnqpfobiqppkmb] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:06
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-njqunhunyfwcjcub] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:06
-!- Toxodont_ [sid110179@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-pqjphgsnuwfzwodl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:06
-!- gocrazy [~gocrazey@69.7.121.63] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]10:06
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-yzzedusvovnbjujn] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:06
-!- TBI_ [~TBI@84.48.195.20] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:08
-!- _whitelogger_ [whitelogge@fehu.whitequark.org] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:09
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]10:09
-!- mappum_ [sid43795@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-lfykcvkwzfnjmdpv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:09
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:10
-!- adams___ [sid73416@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hwhwrdavzudwsxdq] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:10
-!- CodeShark_ [uid126576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qeenomxiovgfzlky] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:11
-!- wangchun_ [~wangchun@li414-193.members.linode.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:12
-!- seg_ [~seg@fsf/member/seg] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:13
-!- argh_ [~grantsmit@2607:5300:60:69b1:fed5:0:fd54:70de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- _whitelogger [whitelogge@fehu.whitequark.org] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- mappum [sid43795@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mefqzjnwnpkpqeyu] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- dignork [~dignork@unaffiliated/dignork] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- seg [~seg@fsf/member/seg] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- CodeShark [uid126576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-saclfdnhbfpddign] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- katu [~kat@lua.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- adams__ [sid73416@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xogriaoubganlnux] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- s1w [~s1w@unaffiliated/someoneweird] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- binaryFateCloud [~jeremie@joule.ulb.ac.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- TBI [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- phantomcircuit [phantomcir@2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe73:6892] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-140-204.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- Monthrect [~P4rtyV4n@2a03:b0c0:1:d0::d0:b001] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- wangchun [~wangchun@li414-193.members.linode.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- ttttemp_ [~ttttemp@pc-10236.ethz.ch] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:13
-!- binaryFateCloud [~jeremie@joule.ulb.ac.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:13
-!- s1w [~s1w@2400:6180:0:d0::4e1:5001] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:13
-!- CodeShark_ is now known as CodeShark10:13
-!- null_radix [Elite7851@gateway/shell/elitebnc/x-vjxylsqmelkfaizs] has quit [Excess Flood]10:14
-!- mappum_ is now known as mappum10:14
-!- ManfredMacx [~hyperion@93-136-57-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has quit [Quit: Leaving]10:14
-!- JackH_ [~Jack@host-80-43-140-204.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:14
-!- grantsmith [~grantsmit@unaffiliated/grantsmith] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:14
-!- seg_ is now known as seg10:14
-!- adams___ is now known as adams__10:14
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]10:15
-!- phantomcircuit [~phantomci@strateman.ninja] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:15
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:16
-!- null_radix [Elite7851@gateway/shell/elitebnc/x-nksjbsktlqiljgxo] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:16
-!- smk [5e663891@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.102.56.145] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]10:19
-!- ttttemp [~ttttemp@pc-10236.ethz.ch] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:19
-!- binaryFateCloud [~jeremie@joule.ulb.ac.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:20
-!- s1w [~s1w@2400:6180:0:d0::4e1:5001] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:20
-!- binaryFateCloud [~jeremie@joule.ulb.ac.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:20
-!- s1w- [~s1w@128.199.100.16] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:20
-!- q-biq [~mirkk@unaffiiliated/q-biq] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:24
-!- binaryFateCloud [~jeremie@joule.ulb.ac.be] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]10:26
-!- Monthrect [~P4rtyV4n@2a03:b0c0:1:d0::d0:b001] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:26
-!- binaryFateCloud [~jeremie@joule.ulb.ac.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:26
-!- katu [~kat@lua.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:27
-!- q-biq [~mirkk@unaffiiliated/q-biq] has left #bitcoin-wizards ["Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com"]10:28
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:35
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:36
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Client Quit]10:38
-!- Erik_dc [~erik@d54c620ed.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:44
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:47
-!- CautiousNarwhal [ad03d8c6@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.173.3.216.198] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:47
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has quit [Changing host]10:47
-!- gielbier [~giel____@unaffiliated/gielbier] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:47
-!- rustyn [~rustyn@unaffiliated/rustyn] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]10:50
-!- rustyn [~rustyn@unaffiliated/rustyn] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:51
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]10:52
-!- CautiousNarwhal [ad03d8c6@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.173.3.216.198] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]10:54
lmatteisguys i've been having this idea and i'd be interested in learning whether it's not just mumbo jumbo but rather something interesting.10:56
lmatteisimagine a blockchain (outside of bitcoin) which is only used as a timestamp server; no transactions. every 60 minutes a block is found which essentially contains the "top news of that latest hour" - an ordered set of items.10:57
lmatteisthe miner that wins the pow, and finds the block, chains it with the latest one, and can decide the contents of the latest hot news10:58
sipawhat is the incentive?10:58
sipawhy do you need a consensus system for this?10:58
bsm117532It's already being done with different kinds of data on top of bitcoin in OP_RETURN.  What's the point of "latest hot news"?10:59
sipawhat is wrong with a website that aggregates upvotes instead?10:59
lmatteisas the difficulty increases, users can coalesce in p2p mining pools such as p2pool, and instead of deciding on the % for their payout (bitcoin), they decide on what their news item should be and where it would be ranked in the block (the power CPU, the highest it could be)10:59
sipabitcoin's value is essential for providing the economic incentive for the blockchain to converge11:00
lmatteisMiners have the incentive to participate in the system as they are given the chance to decide on the content of the block11:00
sipawhat problem are you trying to solve?11:01
lmatteisok, so the goal would be to create a news system that is totally unbiased11:01
sipawhy would tue result be unbiased?11:01
bsm117532I can see an iteration of that idea being useful to pay news content providers.  After-the-fact payment would be better than the clickbait bullshit we have going on now.11:02
sipathere is no incentive to participate in your system, and pay for the pow expenses11:02
lmatteiswell, the idea is that since the ranking of the items in the block is decided by the participants, via their CPU power, it could be less biased than regular news outlets11:02
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.10.241] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]11:03
sipai thonk it would quickly degenerate into a system where advertizers pay to get their content included11:03
lmatteissorry, "totally unbiased" might be impossible - goal is to make it less biased than current centralized systems11:03
sipai think it's far worse11:03
sipathere is no reputation for miners to uohold11:03
bsm117532lmatteis: I don't see the use of PoW here.  You might have a look at the prediction market ideas and apply them to news.11:03
lmatteisbsm117532: PoW is only used to achieve consensus11:04
lmatteissipa: right i see11:04
bsm117532But this is an opinion poll.  Consensus isn't required.11:04
bsm117532OTOH prediction markets force users to commit resources to their "bets", and may be more relevant for you.11:04
lmatteishrm i don't really know what and how prediction markets are11:07
lmatteisor work11:07
-!- chmod755 [~chmod755@unaffiliated/chmod755] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:07
bsm117532https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market11:07
-!- spinza [~spin@197.89.10.241] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:08
lmatteissipa: well you have to imagine that the pow expenses only increase with interest. so in the beginning, it'll be easy to mine with basic hardware11:08
bsm117532See also http://www.augur.net/11:08
lmatteismy interest is simply to have a "news page" every 30-60 minutes or so, which contents and order is decided by the amount of pow given by users. i think the results could be interesting at first; users could dedicate some of their CPU time towards specific news items they want to see at the top11:10
lmatteishowever, i do of course see  that it could degenerate; advertisers could outpace the regular users and promote their own content11:10
sipalmatteis: cpu time can be bought; ultimately you are providing anhorribly inefficient pay-for-distribution scheme11:11
sipaat least reddit requires solving some captchas :)11:11
lmatteiswith you still have to trust reddit admins11:11
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:12
sipayou can still turn it into a distributed system... use something like a WoT identities where users vote on interesting stories etc11:13
-!- justice_ [~textual@HSI-KBW-46-223-37-131.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:13
lmatteisyou still need someone central to verify WoT identities are valid (not bots)11:14
bsm117532lmatteis: All you really need is people to commit resources to their vote, doesn't have to be PoW resource, it could be bitcoin instead.  Also then you don't care about bots.  If someone wants to pay for bots to falsely upvote something, let them.  Someone else profits from it.11:16
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]11:16
bsm117532The Scientologists have been doing this for years, buying out copies of Dianetics at bookstores to keep it on bestseller lists.11:16
bsm117532(At a loss to them though)11:16
-!- wangchun_ [~wangchun@li414-193.members.linode.com] has quit [Quit: leaving]11:19
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:19
-!- wangchun [~wangchun@li414-193.members.linode.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:19
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Client Quit]11:19
-!- dignork [~dignork@unaffiliated/dignork] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:24
-!- gocrazy [~gocrazey@69.7.121.63] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:25
-!- giel__ [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:29
-!- gielbier [~giel____@unaffiliated/gielbier] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:30
-!- gocrazy [~gocrazey@69.7.121.63] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]11:30
-!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:32
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: larraboj, devrandom, epscy, jaromil, guruvan, ryan-c, otoburb, pigeons, roasbeef, Fistful_of_Coins, (+33 more, use /NETSPLIT to show all of them)11:34
-!- Netsplit over, joins: brand0, Guyver2, gmaxwell, Starduster, myeagleflies, indolering, lclc, OxADADA, grandmaster2, livegnik (+32 more)11:34
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:34
-!- bobke_ [~bobke@94-226-145-186.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:37
-!- digitalmagus8 [~digitalma@unaffiliated/digitalmagus] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]11:37
-!- bobke [~bobke@94-226-145-186.access.telenet.be] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]11:37
-!- lomax__ [sid52157@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ermahoqwjguhejyg] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]11:37
-!- zmachine [~zmachine@pool-74-100-90-30.lsanca.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]11:37
-!- digitalmagus8 [~digitalma@unaffiliated/digitalmagus] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:38
-!- lomax__ [sid52157@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fyqhhdnvncdblpng] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:38
-!- jouke_ [~jouke@a83-163-42-163.adsl.xs4all.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]11:38
-!- jouke [~jouke@a83-163-42-163.adsl.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:39
-!- zmachine [~zmachine@pool-74-100-90-30.lsanca.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:39
-!- smk [689ce490@gateway/web/freenode/ip.104.156.228.144] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:39
-!- dave4925 [dave4925@unaffiliated/dave4925] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]11:39
-!- dave4925 [dave4925@unaffiliated/dave4925] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:39
-!- so [~so@unaffiliated/so] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]11:39
-!- gribble [~gribble@unaffiliated/nanotube/bot/gribble] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:40
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:41
-!- c0rw|zZz is now known as c0rw1n11:42
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:45
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:50
-!- smk [689ce490@gateway/web/freenode/ip.104.156.228.144] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]11:56
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:07
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:306:b8e0:8160:9d49:902d:4b04:7afc] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]12:10
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]12:21
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit []12:24
-!- bramc [~bram@99-75-88-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:24
-!- smk [505240ef@gateway/web/freenode/ip.80.82.64.239] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:28
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:29
-!- luigi1111w [~luigi1112@unaffiliated/luigi1111] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]12:30
-!- Guest43031 [~luigi1112@static-216-176-69-170.consolidated.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:31
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]12:35
-!- so [~so@unaffiliated/so] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:35
-!- Emcy [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:35
-!- Emcy [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Changing host]12:35
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:35
-!- jtimon [~quassel@74.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]12:36
-!- jtimon [~quassel@74.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:37
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]12:39
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:40
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@rrcs-74-87-213-251.west.biz.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:43
-!- zookolaptop [~user@2601:281:8001:26aa:6d4c:c7eb:6a6a:6504] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:55
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:57
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:57
-!- bramc [~bram@99-75-88-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]13:00
-!- maaku [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]13:02
-!- Jeremy_Rand_2 [~user@ip68-97-45-209.ok.ok.cox.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]13:03
-!- Jeremy_Rand_2 [~user@ip68-97-45-209.ok.ok.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:04
-!- kisspunch [~za3k@za3k.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]13:05
-!- STRML [~STRML@unaffiliated/strml] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]13:07
-!- STRML [~STRML@unaffiliated/strml] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:10
-!- kisspunch [~za3k@za3k.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:10
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:11
-!- maaku [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:12
-!- maaku is now known as Guest1543513:12
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]13:15
-!- Guest15435 [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has quit [Client Quit]13:15
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]13:16
-!- mjerr [~mjerr@p5B20901A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]13:17
-!- kisspunch [~za3k@za3k.com] has quit [Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in]13:18
-!- maaku_ [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:20
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:23
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:24
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:24
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]13:26
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]13:27
-!- coinoperated [~coinopera@c-73-163-103-87.hsd1.dc.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:28
-!- smk [505240ef@gateway/web/freenode/ip.80.82.64.239] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]13:30
-!- maaku_ [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]13:31
-!- maaku_ [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:33
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:43
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:43
-!- TBI [~TBI@84.48.195.20] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:46
-!- TBI_ [~TBI@84.48.195.20] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]13:47
-!- Terry4 [~Terry4@2605:e000:4ddb:7300:916:cf47:4352:2de6] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]13:52
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Quit: Leaving]13:53
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has quit [Quit: Quit]13:55
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:56
-!- pistdov [d0a7fe15@gateway/web/freenode/ip.208.167.254.21] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:07
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:18
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:20
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:29
-!- giel__ [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]14:29
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:29
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has quit [Changing host]14:30
-!- gielbier [~giel____@unaffiliated/gielbier] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:30
-!- franendar_ [~franendar@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/franendar/x-63182485] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:38
-!- gielbier [~giel____@unaffiliated/gielbier] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]14:44
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:45
-!- franendar_ [~franendar@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/franendar/x-63182485] has left #bitcoin-wizards ["Leaving"]14:45
-!- nuke1989 [~nuke@178-157-152.dynamic.cyta.gr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:48
-!- Erik_dc [~erik@d54c620ed.access.telenet.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:59
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:17
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Changing host]15:17
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:17
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]15:19
-!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@204.28.124.82] has quit [Quit: .]15:20
-!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@204.28.124.82] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:22
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]15:24
-!- davec [~davec@cpe-24-243-251-52.hot.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]15:27
-!- pistdov [d0a7fe15@gateway/web/freenode/ip.208.167.254.21] has quit [Quit: 3rd reicht]15:27
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has quit [Quit: Leaving]15:31
-!- davec [~davec@cpe-24-243-251-52.hot.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:31
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@n182z6l196.static.ctm.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]15:33
-!- tripleslash [~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:55
-!- TBI [~TBI@84.48.195.20] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]15:56
-!- TBI [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:57
-!- gocrazy [~gocrazey@69.7.121.63] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:00
-!- Newyorkadam [~Newyorkad@wikipedia/Newyorkadam] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:03
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:08
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]16:10
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:17
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]16:19
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@rrcs-74-87-213-251.west.biz.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]16:24
-!- Newyorkadam [~Newyorkad@wikipedia/Newyorkadam] has quit [Quit: Newyorkadam]16:26
-!- Newyorkadam [~Newyorkad@wikipedia/Newyorkadam] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:29
-!- Newyorkadam [~Newyorkad@wikipedia/Newyorkadam] has quit [Client Quit]16:29
-!- Monthrect is now known as Piper-Off16:30
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@ip1f11db5b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]16:35
-!- metric [~metric@199.127.226.246] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:39
-!- metric is now known as Guest7836116:40
-!- shesek [~shesek@bzq-84-110-34-170.cablep.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]16:49
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-yzzedusvovnbjujn] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]16:51
-!- bramc [~bram@99-75-88-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:53
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit []17:00
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r179-25-243-17.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:09
-!- zookolaptop [~user@2601:281:8001:26aa:6d4c:c7eb:6a6a:6504] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]17:16
-!- c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|zZz17:24
-!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-139-55-215-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:26
-!- zookolaptop [~user@2601:281:8001:26aa:6d4c:c7eb:6a6a:6504] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:27
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:36
-!- shesek [~shesek@bzq-84-110-34-170.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:38
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has quit [Quit: Leaving]18:09
-!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]18:09
-!- chmod755 [~chmod755@unaffiliated/chmod755] has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]18:13
-!- adam3us [~Adium@141.8.72.43] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]18:15
-!- adam3us [~Adium@141.8.72.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:17
-!- Jeremy_Rand_2 [~user@ip68-97-45-209.ok.ok.cox.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]18:18
-!- gocrazy [~gocrazey@69.7.121.63] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]18:24
-!- zookolaptop [~user@2601:281:8001:26aa:6d4c:c7eb:6a6a:6504] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]18:37
-!- gocrazy [~gocrazey@104.156.228.154] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:37
-!- sneak [~sneak@unaffiliated/sneak] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]18:50
-!- sneak [~sneak@2a01:4f8:141:ffc:8dce:c946:a9e0:d4bf] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:51
-!- sneak [~sneak@2a01:4f8:141:ffc:8dce:c946:a9e0:d4bf] has quit [Changing host]18:51
-!- sneak [~sneak@unaffiliated/sneak] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:51
-!- Newyorkadam [~Newyorkad@wikipedia/Newyorkadam] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:53
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:306:b8e0:8160:2df1:ce34:8cf7:c6b3] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:56
-!- tachys [~alex@c-50-131-227-138.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:01
-!- TBI_ [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:03
-!- TBI [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]19:05
-!- tachys [~alex@c-50-131-227-138.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:06
-!- Jeremy_Rand_2 [~user@172.58.104.183] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:11
-!- bitdevsnyc [bitdevsnyc@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-faddhdopkreqmwwr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:13
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:15
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]19:19
-!- RoboTedd_ [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:19
-!- Jeremy_Rand [~jeremy@172.58.104.183] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:20
-!- bit2017 [~linker@171.250.100.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:20
-!- Jeremy_Rand [~jeremy@172.58.104.183] has left #bitcoin-wizards []19:21
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]19:22
-!- kisspunch [~za3k@za3k.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:24
-!- justice_ [~textual@HSI-KBW-46-223-37-131.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]19:24
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has left #bitcoin-wizards []19:25
-!- justice [~textual@HSI-KBW-46-223-37-131.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:31
-!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-139-55-215-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]19:37
-!- Piper-Off [~P4rtyV4n@2a03:b0c0:1:d0::d0:b001] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:50
-!- jcorgan is now known as jcorgan|away19:51
-!- Newyorkadam [~Newyorkad@wikipedia/Newyorkadam] has quit [Quit: Newyorkadam]20:01
-!- Newyorkadam [~Newyorkad@wikipedia/Newyorkadam] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:03
-!- Jeremy_Rand_2 [~user@172.58.104.183] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]20:14
-!- RoboTedd_ [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]20:18
-!- tachys [~alex@c-50-131-227-138.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:23
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:24
-!- tachys [~alex@c-50-131-227-138.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]20:27
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r179-25-243-17.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has quit [Quit: Leaving]20:28
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:306:b8e0:8160:2df1:ce34:8cf7:c6b3] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]20:33
-!- raver_edm [~vegas_nig@2602:306:b8e0:8160:95a4:f8cb:4bcb:d950] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]20:33
-!- raver_edm [~vegas_nig@2602:306:b8e0:8160:95a4:f8cb:4bcb:d950] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:33
-!- NewLiberty [~NewLibert@2602:306:b8e0:8160:2df1:ce34:8cf7:c6b3] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:33
-!- kisspunch [~za3k@za3k.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]20:35
-!- malte- [~malte@2a00:d0c0:200:0:b9:1a:9c2c:1] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]20:36
-!- malte [~malte@alkaid.uberspace.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:37
-!- kisspunch [~za3k@za3k.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:37
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:41
-!- epopt [~epopt@108-208-198-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:41
-!- s1w- [~s1w@128.199.100.16] has quit [Changing host]20:51
-!- s1w- [~s1w@unaffiliated/someoneweird] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:51
-!- nubbins` [~leel@unaffiliated/nubbins] has quit [Quit: Quit]20:51
-!- [7] [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Disconnected by services]20:54
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:54
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:55
-!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]20:55
-!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:56
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]21:15
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:19
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:20
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@62.214.5.194] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:21
-!- Newyorkadam [~Newyorkad@wikipedia/Newyorkadam] has quit [Quit: Newyorkadam]21:23
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]21:24
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@62.214.5.194] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]21:27
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]21:29
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-npfishiefvnaulah] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]21:31
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]21:39
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:41
-!- go1111111 [~go1111111@104.232.116.217] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]21:48
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:49
-!- tachys [~alex@50.131.227.138] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:49
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:52
-!- tachys [~alex@50.131.227.138] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]21:54
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]21:58
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]22:04
-!- shesek [~shesek@bzq-84-110-34-170.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]22:09
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:12
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:25
-!- CautiousNarwhal [ad03d8c6@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.173.3.216.198] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:26
-!- Quent [~Quent@unaffiliated/quent] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]22:28
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:30
-!- RoboTeddy [~roboteddy@c-67-188-40-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]22:30
-!- weex_ is now known as weex22:32
-!- weex is now known as Guest24622:32
-!- Guest246 is now known as weex_22:34
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]22:35
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]22:38
-!- Terry4 [~Terry4@testbed-users.tor-exit.calyxinstitute.org] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:42
-!- frankenmint [~frankenmi@75-175-72-226.ptld.qwest.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:45
-!- nuke1989 [~nuke@178-157-152.dynamic.cyta.gr] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]22:45
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70.36.136.123] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:53
-!- p15 [~p15@ip-27-214-104-93.static.contabo.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:55
-!- CautiousNarwhal [ad03d8c6@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.173.3.216.198] has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]22:57
kanzurejl2012: sorry about getting moderated. FWIW i think your email was on-topic.22:57
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]22:59
-!- bit2017 [~linker@171.250.100.43] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]23:01
-!- Quent [~Quent@unaffiliated/quent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:07
btcdrakjl2012: me too23:08
gmaxwellme too;  though the thread was getting circular; but it wasn't the fault of jl2012.23:12
gmaxwellBitcoin-dev is just not a safe space to discuss new ideas.23:12
jl2012anyway, I believe it's better to move to somewhere else, as it is just a rough idea not for implementation in near term23:13
bramcI'm missing context here, but the thought which may or may not be relevant is what you really want in blocks is roots of three things: utxos added this block, utxos removed this block, and utxos after the previous block23:13
gmaxwellyea, it's further out. And I think it's okay that the list isn't there.23:14
-!- p15x [~p15x@114.248.217.16] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:14
gmaxweller list isn't ideal for that regardless.23:14
bramcThat way you have a whole block of time to recalculate a utxo root, which is good because that might take a few dozen milliseconds or more.23:15
gmaxwellThough I am a bit unhappy with the confused shouting out by people who AFAIK have little background in the subject matter... since it makes the list inapproiate for things that are nearer term too.23:15
-!- weex_ is now known as weex23:17
-!- weex [~weex@web1.bitcoinatmlocations.org] has quit [Changing host]23:17
-!- weex [~weex@fsf/member/weex] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:17
jl2012kanzure: I don't mind moving away after some initial discussion. Just wonder why I have to wait for moderation for all my posts23:18
-!- TBI_ [~TBI@20.84-48-195.nextgentel.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]23:21
gmaxwellI'd say that it would be beneficial to hammer out things like that in plances where the audience will not be as likely to get caught up in misunderstandings.. but your post I think was pretty clear. I think if I checked it first I wouldn't have suggested any clarifications, beyond pointing you to where very similar things had been discussed before.23:21
bramcI'm trying to guess what y'all are discussing based on previous traffic on this channel and it isn't clear.23:22
gmaxwellSomeone have an archive link for bramc.23:23
gmaxwell?23:23
-!- bitcoin-wizards7 [8984030a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.137.132.3.10] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:25
jl2012gmaxwell: Would you please point me to Peter Todd's similar proposal?23:25
jl2012If a proposal is useful and not done, the probability for it to be reinvented approaches 1.23:27
gmaxwellbramc: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011952.html23:27
bramcgmaxwell, thanks23:28
jl2012please continue the discussion in https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinwizards/comments/3wr4yz/forget_dormant_utxos_without_confiscating_bitcoin/23:29
gmaxwelljl2012: I'm not sure what the best link is. He has propsed 'stxo' commitments which is an insertion ordered commitment over every txout created (or in some versions he's described it as being over all the txouts that fall off the end of a fixed size FIFO utxo set). When a STXO is spent the spend includes an update proof the shows membership and sets it to an empty alue.23:29
-!- bit2017 [~linker@115.79.55.177] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:29
gmaxwellSo more or less what you were thinking, but the original direction of the approach is different, and some details were different: e.g. fixed size vs time based.23:30
gmaxwellThis would let you have determinstic storage requirements for nodes.23:30
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:32
bramcSounds like a reasonable idea, although I'd add in a few things (these may be in the proposal already, I'm not fully clear on the details): There should be batches over time, possibly each batch doesn't need to be included until a few blocks after it ends, to give time for its computation. It has the downside of making transactions quite a bit bigger (those paths to merkle roots are much larger than signatures). We don't23:32
bramc need it yet.23:32
jl2012time based UTXO limit + block size limit also indirectly sets an upper UTXO limit, at least you could calculate a theoretical one23:33
gmaxwellFWIW, most of the path is common to almost every transaction (the top of the tree)23:35
gmaxwellso if you require nodes to keep track of the top couple levels of the tree, those directly go off the count.23:35
bramcgmaxwell, They're still big, at least compared to ECC hashes23:36
gmaxwelle.g. doesn't take much state to store the top 16 levels of the tree (65536 leaves), and would cut 512 bytes off every stxo txin23:37
bramcA hash is 256 bits, or 32 bytes. With a set of 1000 things, that winds up being 320 bytes23:37
-!- tromp [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]23:37
gmaxwellI think this could actually be negoiated too. e.g. "I keep the top X, don't send me that"23:37
fluffyponyheh23:38
bramcYou could also have the batches be referred to by number, and do them frequently. That would cut down on size as well. But still, any way you slice it resurrecting an archived utxo would require several times as many bytes as a regular transaction23:38
fluffyponyjl2012: not sure if you're aware, but ThomasV proposed exactly this like a year ago23:38
gmaxwellyes, in these schemes the archived txouts take more space to spend for sure.23:39
gmaxwellthough as I said, degrees of fractionality of the tree to could be hop by hop negoiated.23:40
gmaxwellSo people could freely make space/bandwidth tradeoff decisions.23:40
-!- bitcoin-wizards7 [8984030a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.137.132.3.10] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]23:40
kanzurejl2012: you have to wait for moderation because we keep forgetting to unset your moderation bit! sorry about that. i'll try to remember.23:41
-!- damethos [~damethos@unaffiliated/damethos] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:42
jl2012for a block with 1024 UTXOs, 10 layers of hash would take 320bytes, plus other required info it should not take more than 400 bytes23:43
jl2012so the size is inflated by 100-200% for a normal 250bytes tx. Not a big deal IMO23:44
gmaxwellyea, and 10 layers is a lot, if you're assuming 16 layers of "common data"23:45
-!- go1111111 [~go1111111@104.232.116.217] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:46
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]23:48
-!- melvster [~melvster@86.49.18.198] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:48
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:51
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-chpkftmygwwoqlsm] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:54
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70.36.136.123] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]23:58
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@70-36-136-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:59
--- Log closed Mon Dec 14 00:00:36 2015

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!