2016-01-06.log

--- Log opened Wed Jan 06 00:00:22 2016
--- Day changed Wed Jan 06 2016
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:00
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]00:00
-!- supasonic [~supasonic@172-11-188-117.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]00:01
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:09
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]00:11
-!- nuke1989 [~nuke@178-157-152.dynamic.cyta.gr] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]00:13
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Quit: Leaving]00:18
-!- licnep [uid4387@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-moqvlkpwaialahua] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:19
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:19
-!- bramc [~bram@2601:646:c502:1cbf:d040:35f5:abea:8739] has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]00:21
-!- LeMiner [LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]00:21
-!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-67-168-82-178.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:29
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:30
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@c-67-168-82-178.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]00:33
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards00:58
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]01:03
-!- sparetire_ [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has quit [Quit: sparetire_]01:06
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:08
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]01:10
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:12
-!- AmpEater [~AmpEater@cpe-67-251-64-132.stny.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:29
-!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:31
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:36
-!- julesxx [~julesxx@host31-51-5-29.range31-51.btcentralplus.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards01:40
-!- julesxx [~julesxx@host31-51-5-29.range31-51.btcentralplus.com] has left #bitcoin-wizards []01:41
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]01:49
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit []01:54
-!- bit2017 [~linker@210.245.34.191] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:01
-!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-45-58-251-121.dyn.295.ca] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]02:03
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]02:12
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:17
-!- pozitron [~nu@104.238.169.136] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:29
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]02:33
-!- stevenroose_ [~steven@193.190.253.144] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:35
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]02:37
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:38
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:38
-!- p15 [~p15@64.145.91.101] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]02:40
-!- markus-k [~markus-k@designnet.work.de] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]02:41
-!- p15 [~p15@111.193.188.31] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:42
-!- p15 [~p15@111.193.188.31] has quit [Client Quit]02:43
-!- pozitron [~nu@104.238.169.136] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]02:43
-!- p15 [~p15@53.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:49
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards02:49
-!- justice_ [~textual@HSI-KBW-46-223-37-131.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]02:58
-!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-67-168-82-178.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]03:08
-!- markus-k [~markus-k@designnet.work.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:16
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Quit: Quitte]03:26
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:26
-!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]03:27
-!- Piper-Off is now known as Monthrect03:29
-!- tromp__ [~tromp@ool-18be0bd8.dyn.optonline.net] has quit []03:37
-!- markus-k [~markus-k@designnet.work.de] has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]03:37
-!- markus-k [~markus-k@designnet.work.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards03:38
-!- AmpEater [~AmpEater@cpe-67-251-64-132.stny.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]03:55
-!- gielbier [~giel____@unaffiliated/gielbier] has quit [Quit: Leaving]04:02
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]04:03
-!- brg444 [18257df2@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.37.125.242] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]04:06
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:08
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:09
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit []04:12
-!- pozitrono [~nu@tor-exit-node.seas.upenn.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:18
-!- p15 [~p15@53.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]04:21
-!- tucenaber_ [~tucenaber@o144.231.lokis.net.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]04:40
-!- c0rw|away is now known as c0rw1n04:45
-!- K1773R [~K1773R@unaffiliated/k1773r] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]04:46
-!- stevenroose [stevenroos@bnc1.sollidi.us] has quit [Disconnected by services]04:52
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@2a02:8108:73f:f6e4:e23f:49ff:fe47:9364] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:57
-!- K1773R [~K1773R@unaffiliated/k1773r] has joined #bitcoin-wizards04:59
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]05:05
-!- stevenroose [stevenroos@bnc1.sollidi.us] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:06
-!- jannes [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:07
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:09
-!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]05:10
-!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:10
-!- el33th4x0r [~egs@2604:6000:bd40:d500:70ae:bed2:1394:77c3] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:12
-!- trippysalmon [rob@2001:984:6466:0:51d:b5ab:ab61:bed8] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:16
-!- bit2017 [~linker@210.245.34.191] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]05:16
-!- Logicwax [~Logicwax@c-76-126-174-152.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]05:19
-!- stevenroose [stevenroos@bnc1.sollidi.us] has quit [Disconnected by services]05:20
-!- stevenroose_ is now known as stevenroose05:20
-!- stevenroose|BNC [stevenroos@bnc1.sollidi.us] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:20
-!- trippysalmon [rob@2001:984:6466:0:51d:b5ab:ab61:bed8] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]05:26
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@host217-39-13-116.in-addr.btopenworld.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:47
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@host217-39-13-116.in-addr.btopenworld.com] has quit [Changing host]05:47
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:47
-!- el33th4x0r [~egs@2604:6000:bd40:d500:70ae:bed2:1394:77c3] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]05:51
-!- el33th4x0r [~egs@2604:6000:bd40:d500:70ae:bed2:1394:77c3] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:53
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Quit: Quitte]05:53
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Quit: Leaving]05:54
-!- LeMiner [~LeMiner@94.209.175.191] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:57
-!- LeMiner [~LeMiner@94.209.175.191] has quit [Changing host]05:57
-!- LeMiner [~LeMiner@unaffiliated/leminer] has joined #bitcoin-wizards05:57
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:00
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Quit: laurentmt]06:22
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-125-203.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: GGuyZ]06:26
kanzure"interactive proof-of-stake" http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00275 i haven't evaluated, don't shoot the messenger...06:26
-!- MrHodl [~fuc@ool-43571e2c.dyn.optonline.net] has quit []06:34
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@89.197.31.78] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:36
-!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-139-55-215-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards06:37
-!- el33th4x0r [~egs@2604:6000:bd40:d500:70ae:bed2:1394:77c3] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]06:55
-!- hashtag_ [~hashtag@cpe-174-97-254-80.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]07:00
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]07:02
-!- el33th4x0r [~egs@2604:6000:bd40:d500:70ae:bed2:1394:77c3] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:08
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:08
-!- supasonic [~supasonic@172-11-188-117.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:08
-!- yang [yang@freenode/sponsor/fsf.member.yang] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]07:15
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:15
-!- laurentmt [~Thunderbi@128-79-141-196.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Client Quit]07:16
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@2a02:8108:73f:f6e4:e23f:49ff:fe47:9364] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]07:17
-!- sipi [~sipi@ip-195-14-160-197.bnk.lt] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:24
nshnew from [bitcoin-dev] 'Confidential Transactions as a soft fork (using segwit)'07:28
kanzure"Confidential Transactions as a soft fork (usingsegwit)" http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/012194.html07:28
-!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@204.28.124.82] has quit [Quit: .]07:28
nshhttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/012194.html07:28
-!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@204.28.124.82] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:30
-!- yang [yang@freenode/sponsor/fsf.member.yang] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:30
-!- luigi1111vaca is now known as luigi1111w07:32
-!- markus-k [~markus-k@designnet.work.de] has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]07:33
-!- PaulCape_ [~PaulCapes@204.28.124.82] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:35
jannesI'm wondering if this was ever commented on by core devs? https://tradeblock.com/blog/bitcoin-network-capacity-analysis-part-6-data-propagation  June 2015, so I searched wizards log, but don't see it mentioned. Data (if correct) seems pretty supportive of the predicted problems of raising blocksize.07:37
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-125-203.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:37
-!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@204.28.124.82] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]07:37
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@2a02:8108:73f:f6e4:e23f:49ff:fe47:9364] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:41
phantomcircuitjannes, it would be significantly worse than it appears without the relay network07:43
phantomcircuitnotice how at 800-900 kB the relay time goes down relative to 700-800kB? that's because iirc 100% of miners mining >750kB blocks are on the relay network07:44
phantomcircuitbut the relay network isn't a security measure07:44
phantomcircuitso their best-fit curve is off by a significant constant factor07:45
-!- c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|away07:50
-!- tucenaber [~tucenaber@o144.231.lokis.net.pl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:51
-!- tucenaber [~tucenaber@o144.231.lokis.net.pl] has quit [Changing host]07:51
-!- tucenaber [~tucenaber@unaffiliated/tucenaber] has joined #bitcoin-wizards07:51
jannesphantomcircuit: That's a cool little data point about >750kB.07:59
jannesphantomcircuit: Yeah I agree on your points about relay network. But even with that factor, this data already shows that for example 8MB is out of the question, right?07:59
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:02
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Client Quit]08:03
phantomcircuitjannes, oh absolutely08:03
phantomcircuitim saying that they understate just how out of the question it is08:03
jannesBasically my question would be, can I use this data to prove to bigblockers that the problems are very real and any increase will quickly blow things up.08:05
jannesAnd if so, I'm wondering why this data is not referenced more often in the discussions. Or maybe there is an improved study that does take the relay network into account?08:06
-!- MrHodl [~fuc@95.211.205.69] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:06
kanzurenah, they are intent on ignoring the relay network, see http://pastebin.com/jFgkk8M308:07
jannesoh geez is Peter R related to tradeblock?08:09
kanzuresorry, "they" was not meant to refer to tradeblock, my bad08:09
kanzurei have no idea. probably not?08:10
-!- PaulCape_ [~PaulCapes@204.28.124.82] has quit [Quit: .]08:10
-!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@204.28.124.82] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:10
jannesoh ok... scared me there :)   I get it, you meant "bigblockers". That's true.08:11
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:12
jannesBut if the tradeblock results _include_ the relay network and they already show that 4MB is pretty much impossible. I guess they will argue that the "propagation to 3000 nodes" is not relevant, only "propagation to the 100 miner nodes" or some such excuse.08:13
-!- atgreen [~green@CPE687f74122463-CM00fc8d24cab0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]08:16
-!- se3000 [~textual@38.125.163.25] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:16
-!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:18
phantomcircuitjannes, they end up arguing for a system with a single central mining pool and removal of the 21 million bitcoin limit08:20
-!- K1773R [~K1773R@unaffiliated/k1773r] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]08:22
-!- Erik_dc [~erik@d54c620ed.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:24
-!- K1773R [~K1773R@unaffiliated/k1773r] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:25
kanzurephantomcircuit: true, data that cannot be verified against known limits, is practically a removal of the limit08:28
kanzuresince centralized mining pools (and central transaction processing) is so trivial to achieve (especially compared to bitcoin's network and decentralization and properties), i am curious why they continue to insist on using the bitcoin p2p network for that. why don't they use a sidechain or some other mechanism? they can still use bitcoin-denominated transactions.08:30
kanzureactually i guess one (perhaps uncharitable?) explanation could be that the resulting mining centralization is a clever game of KYC hot potato :-)08:30
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@remote.digitalmoneycorp.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:32
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@remote.digitalmoneycorp.com] has quit [Changing host]08:32
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@unaffiliated/voxelot] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:32
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:32
-!- gielbier [~giel____@a149043.upc-a.chello.nl] has quit [Changing host]08:32
-!- gielbier [~giel____@unaffiliated/gielbier] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:32
jannesSorry for bringing the blocksize debate into here. Certainly didn't intend to do that. :)08:32
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]08:33
-!- bsm117532 is now known as Guest7055508:34
-!- Guest70555 [~mcelrath@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Killed (asimov.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services))]08:34
-!- Guest65074 is now known as bsm11753208:34
-!- bsm1175321 [~mcelrath@static-108-21-236-13.nycmny.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:34
bsm117532kanzure, nsh: I appreciate the mixing of segwit and confidential transactions.  Would like to see demo code.08:37
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:38
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]08:42
-!- murch [~murch@p4FE38D40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:51
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:54
-!- el33th4x0r [~egs@2604:6000:bd40:d500:70ae:bed2:1394:77c3] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]08:55
-!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]08:58
-!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:58
-!- hashtag_ [~hashtag@cpe-174-97-254-80.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:59
-!- trippysalmon [rob@2001:984:6466:0:51d:b5ab:ab61:bed8] has joined #bitcoin-wizards08:59
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@104.6.36.162] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:00
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@104.6.36.162] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]09:00
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:20
-!- sparetire_ [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:26
-!- brianhoffman [~brianhoff@185.94.28.254] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:27
-!- brianhof_ [~brianhoff@pool-173-79-161-229.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]09:29
-!- bit2017 [~linker@171.250.100.43] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:29
-!- pozitrono [~nu@tor-exit-node.seas.upenn.edu] has quit [K-Lined]09:29
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:45
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:50
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:53
-!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]09:56
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards09:59
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:01
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ynjseosftscphjwy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:02
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]10:03
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@unaffiliated/voxelot] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]10:03
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:05
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:07
MRL-Relay[tacotime] you can, of course, do CT as a softfork if you add new a whole new chunk of external validation data to a block. it's been long discussed before this, but almost everyone agreed that it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere where issues surrounding scalability dominate.10:08
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:08
-!- nabu [~nabu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/nabu] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]10:08
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:09
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:10
nsh(domination by volume does not equate to prevailing rationality)10:11
nsh(but i agree with the assessment, sadly)10:11
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:12
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@remote.digitalmoneycorp.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:14
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:14
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@46.166.188.220] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:16
phantomcircuitbsm117532, it's possible but probably not a good idea for a number of reasons10:16
bsm117532Eventually we'll get them both...10:17
-!- nabu [~nabu@179.43.156.130] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:18
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@remote.digitalmoneycorp.com] has quit [Changing host]10:19
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@unaffiliated/voxelot] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:19
-!- trippysalmon [rob@2001:984:6466:0:51d:b5ab:ab61:bed8] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]10:21
-!- ebfull [~sean@73.34.119.0] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]10:21
-!- Erik_dc [~erik@d54c620ed.access.telenet.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]10:22
coinoperatedblockchain braids sounds like the beginning of a block fabric10:22
* coinoperated reminds himself to scroll down before responding next time10:22
bsm117532coinoperated: If you set the difficulty very low you get a lot of interconnecting beads.  Let's call it a Quilt.10:23
-!- Erik_dc [~erik@d54c620ed.access.telenet.be] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:24
bsm117532A low-difficulty braid: http://imgur.com/qRwO4Oi10:27
phantomcircuitbsm117532, i can see ct being in a sidechain that is merge mined10:27
phantomcircuiti dont think we'll see ct in bitcoin core unless/until lightning (or whatever) takes a huge amount of the load off10:28
kanzurehmm i guess we should start preparing proposals for drop-in api-compatible lightning stuff....10:28
bsm117532Different way of plotting the same low-difficulty braid.  Genesis on left, braid-tips on right.  Each horizontal set of beads is one node (each have different difficulty targets). http://imgur.com/q6O3Eyo10:30
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]10:31
-!- atgreen [~green@209.171.88.190] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:32
bsm117532A high-difficulty braid: http://imgur.com/H1ynirs Only a handful of beads have siblings (analogs of orphans)10:32
bsm117532Throw questions about this at me...good ones will get answered in my paper.10:33
coinoperatedlooks "intuitively" cool, guess i need to read another paper10:33
-!- ebfull [~sean@73.34.119.0] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:34
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]10:36
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:37
kanzurebsm117532: in your hong kong presentation you claimed that block size problems are mostly about and that work solves the contributions of block size to orphan rate. i think you should include text describing assumptions about why you think this is true, and how braiding changes network shape and friction contributed by bandwidth asymmetries. if your contention is that the utility function needs to make a decision about minimum resource ...10:47
kanzure... requirements for validators, then i think you should explicitly state this (and discuss this).10:47
kanzure*and that your work solves10:47
* nsh is more interested in robust decentralised steganographic channels than efficiency of trade so pretty biased towards CT 10:47
nshthe worst thing about bitcoin is all this capitalism nonsense10:48
nsh:P10:48
kanzurensh: you mean all the p2p stuff....?10:49
kanzurensh: transactions should only be authorized by the mother nation during five-year plans? :-)10:49
bsm117532kanzure: Yes I discuss it, thanks for the reminder.  The problems with large blocks are really about latency and validation. Dividing the validation and propagation work smoothly over the entire 10 minute interval makes communication less "spiky" and doesn't max out the bandwidth, like trying to quickly transmit a 1MB block does.  1MB/10min is not a large bandwidth.10:52
kanzurewhat do you mean by "is not a large bandwidth"?10:52
bsm1175321MB/10min = 1.7kb/s.10:52
kanzurelarge is relative; this sort of assumption needs to be elucidated and discussed.10:52
bsm117532If that data were smoothly distributed over the 10 min (as it would be with braids), the bandwidth requirements are modest.10:53
kanzureimplications of existing asymmetries, implications of kicking off certain nodes from the network, etc. implications of breaking backwards-compatibility and how this effects currency value, validation, reasons for mining. on the surface this probably seems irrelevant to you for your work, but there's very little reason for mining (or for a miner to bother mining) without an interest in these other aspects :-).10:54
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards10:55
kanzurealso this applies to other validation cost metric stuff in the utility function you proposed10:55
bsm117532As a practical matter, I'm leaning toward building this as a patch to bitcoin core that operates as a collaborative pool, like p2pool.10:55
* bsm117532 takes notes, will go over your comments again as I edit the draft. Thanks!10:55
kanzurewasn't there something about the contributions of block size to orphan rate to already be minimal in situations involving the existing relay network?10:56
-!- luigi1111w [~luigi1112@unaffiliated/luigi1111] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]10:56
kanzure(while block size wasn't the motivation for your work, orphans and propagation were...)10:57
kanzureto be more clear, by "relay network" i mean http://bitcoinrelaynetwork.org/10:58
erasmospunkkanzure, the relay network helps but it is not part of the p2p network11:01
phantomcircuiterasmospunk, it is actually a p2p protocol11:01
bsm117532Yes it's clear regardless of infrastructure (relay network), as the block size goes up, orphan rates go up.  You can temporarily mitigate it with faster networks, but the effect is fundamental.11:01
phantomcircuitit just so happens matt is the only one running nodes11:01
erasmospunkphantomcircuit: obviously I am referring to the Bitcoin p2p network11:02
erasmospunkthe spiky full block propagation is the big stressor to the nodes11:03
erasmospunkthat's why increasing the block size is a bad idea11:03
bsm117532And decreasing it is a good idea.  ;-)  But you can't use a "chain" anymore if you do that.11:04
nsh>  data were smoothly distributed over the 10 min # would weak blocks work for this too?11:04
bsm117532nsh: Yes they do.11:04
erasmospunknsh: yes11:04
phantomcircuiterasmospunk, the better argument is that the relay network doesn't improve worst case behavior and thus provides zero additional security11:04
bsm117532Weak blocks essentially pre-compute the block validation, and pre-relay the majority of the block.11:05
kanzurei don't think it's possible to claim pre-consensus for adversarial conditions11:05
kanzureor, such claims would be nonsense11:05
erasmospunkphantomcircuit: the worst case is a block that is propagated by a >30% miner via the slow p2p network that contains transactions that were never broadcasted before11:06
erasmospunkkanzure: it is possible with a soft fork11:06
phantomcircuiterasmospunk, yeahhhh it's worse than that with miners doing stratum "validated" mining11:06
-!- Guest43031 [~luigi1112@198.40.253.230] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:07
-!- Guest43031 [~luigi1112@198.40.253.230] has quit [Changing host]11:07
-!- Guest43031 [~luigi1112@unaffiliated/luigi1111] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:07
-!- Guest43031 is now known as luigi1111w11:07
kanzureerasmospunk: many things are possible with a soft-fork. are you talking about "authorized" pre-consensus schemes?11:07
kanzurealso, "authorized pre-consensus" is incapable of enforcing adversary compliance, i think.11:08
erasmospunkkanzure: no, https://gist.github.com/erasmospunk/23040383b7620b525df011:08
kanzure.title11:08
yoleauxEfficient block relay format and mempool soft consensus · GitHub11:08
kanzureplease see https://gist.github.com/erasmospunk/23040383b7620b525df0#gistcomment-166193211:08
erasmospunkkanzure: thanks, for some reason I don't get notifications for gists :(11:09
erasmospunkkanzure: "the argument for smaller blocks is not just bitcoin p2p consensus latency" here you mean the ever growing blockchain size?11:13
erasmospunkwhat is the advantage of smaller block sizes except lower lag and compact blockchain?11:14
bsm117532erasmospunk: If those smaller blocks are mined, you get faster confirmations too.11:15
kanzureas requirements increase in the upward direction, you increase the minimum requirements for using bitcoin itself, which can have negative impact on compatibility with existing bitcoin nodes11:15
bsm117532erasmospunk: Since smaller blocks (probably) have lower difficulty targets, it gets smaller miners back into the game and helps decentralize mining.11:15
erasmospunkbsm117532: smaller blocks as in size?11:16
bsm117532We still need to shard the blockchain, to reduce bandwidth and storage requirements of nodes, but that's a separate problem.11:16
bsm117532erasmospunk: yes.11:16
kanzuremost validating nodes are outside of the direct proof-of-work consensus; or at least, the cost of a vlaidating node is presently cheaper than participation in mining consensus.11:16
erasmospunkhow smaller size lowers the difficulty?11:16
kanzurewell, presently cheaper than relevant participation in mining consensus. well, i mean, more than having one block every umpteen billion years.11:16
bsm117532Smaller blocks must come more frequently.  With constant global hash rate, mined smaller blocks must have a lower target.11:17
erasmospunkalso regarding validation, you don't need to re-validate transactions that were in the mempool11:17
kanzureyou can't get stuff into the mempool if your connection is already saturated11:17
erasmospunkbsm117532: ok, I understood what you mean. I don't think we will ever get rid of the 10min block interval11:18
-!- Guest43031 [~luigi1112@static-216-176-69-170.consolidated.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:18
-!- luigi1111w [~luigi1112@unaffiliated/luigi1111] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]11:18
-!- Guest43031 [~luigi1112@static-216-176-69-170.consolidated.net] has quit [Changing host]11:19
-!- Guest43031 [~luigi1112@unaffiliated/luigi1111] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:19
-!- Guest43031 is now known as luigi1111w11:19
bsm117532erasmospunk: No, the 10m block interval must remain because it is the payout schedule.  However we can decouple it propagating and validating transactions.11:19
erasmospunkkanzure: for 100tx/s you need 50KB/s if we assume 500b average tx size11:19
kanzureerasmospunk: yes i'm aware that we can calculate constants and values for these. but i don't think that's interesting :-).11:19
kanzureit would be surprising if we couldn't, heh11:20
kanzurei would say the actual values are irrelevant, but that to increase the number of participants capable of validation you generally have ot keep requirements low, or generally decreasing, or always increasing slower than technology development and perhaps even accruing benefits from tech development over time.11:21
erasmospunkbsm117532: ok. In that case do we need to include the transactions in the smaller blocks or referring them with tx ids?11:22
kanzure*accruing unused benefits11:22
bsm117532erasmospunk: Implementation detail.  You can do it both ways.  In the latter case you depend on the p2p relay network to transmit tx's.  But it's also possible to build a network *without* that layer and only relay mined tx's.  It's also possible to have a blockless system...11:23
erasmospunkkanzure: I agree. We are wasting bandwidth today with re-broadcasting transactions together with the full blocks11:23
bsm117532I'm a fan of stripping out the p2p relaying of umined tx's.  It's a DDoS target.11:24
phantomcircuitbsm117532, there's code to do that in core already11:24
erasmospunkbsm117532: interesting, how your transactions will reach the miners in that case?11:25
bsm117532phantomcircuit: wha wha wha?!?!  pointers?11:25
phantomcircuitwith the mempool limiter it's not really an issue any longer though11:25
phantomcircuitbsm117532, -blocksonly11:25
bsm117532erasmospunk: Everyone has to be a miner.  Or, make an arrangement to mine on behalf of someone else.  But that doesn't have to be a core functionality.11:25
bsm117532phantomcircuit: That's not really what I meant.  I meant a PoW hash for every tx.11:26
bsm117532e.g. hashcash everything you send me or my node will reject it.11:26
phantomcircuitbsm117532, oh, yeah that's something people have thought about, mostly for the connection eviction logic though11:26
erasmospunkbsm117532: something like a POW fee for your transaction, right? Sounds like BitMessage11:26
gavinandresenbsm117532: transaction fees are exactly the same as POW hashes. They're tiny pieces of POW hashes, re-circulated through the network11:28
-!- fuc [~fuc@ool-43571e2c.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:28
-!- fuc [~fuc@ool-43571e2c.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Client Quit]11:28
bsm117532gavinandresen: Exactly.  You can imagine a network where there's a back-and-forth between the PoW hash and tx fee.  Pay the tx fee with mining, or mine a tiny bit and include a tx fee for someone else to mine.11:29
-!- jannes [~jannes@178.132.211.90] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]11:29
-!- Logicwax [~Logicwax@c-76-126-174-152.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:29
gavinandresenbsm117532: how is that any different from what we have right now?11:29
bsm117532gavinandresen: Right now we relay tx's by p2p for free.11:30
bsm117532gavinandresen: The effect comes out in aggregate, once you integrate over mining pools (which don't need to exist for this idea)11:30
-!- MrHodl [~fuc@95.211.205.69] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]11:32
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:32
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Quit: Leaving]11:32
phantomcircuitgavinandresen, it's different but only just slightly11:32
phantomcircuitsome sort of micropayment system for nodes relaying transactions might be preferable but isn't reasonable today11:33
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]11:34
bsm117532Thank -wizards for being unreasonable.  "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." -- G. B. Shaw11:35
-!- matsjj [~matsjj@89.197.31.78] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]11:38
gavinandresenI've never seen a good explanation of why relay nodes are necessary, in an ideal network transaction creators and recipients would talk directly to each other and would just directly give transactions to miners. And miners (and whoever else was interested in doing full validation) would talk amongst themselves.... I don't see a "relay" function needed when we have a lower level network perfectly able to relay information to any co11:38
gavinandresenmputer anywhere in the world.11:38
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:38
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:39
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@c-67-168-82-178.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:41
bsm117532Relay nodes centralize mining. Every relay node should be a miner. This one way Satoshi set up the system for mining centralization.  :-/11:41
phantomcircuitgavinandresen, there's a number of reasons not the least of which is that the p2p network provides a significant amount of resistance against detection of mining nodes11:43
bsm117532Satoshi's original idea was that all nodes would be mining nodes though...11:43
gavinandresenbsm117532: ummm... no... he said most nodes would be SPV nodes.11:44
phantomcircuitcan we agree to stop trying to quote war satoshi?11:44
phantomcircuitit's not useful11:44
bsm117532Ok true, but he didn't envision non-mining, non-spv nodes that the majority of the network is composed of now.11:44
gavinandresenbsm117532: if relay nodes centralize mining... then mining would be decentralized if we got rid of relay nodes?11:44
phantomcircuitour understanding of the system has advanced significantly since that time11:44
bsm117532gavinandresen: Yes. I'll only relay your tx if you mine it a little bit. (at which point it can be added to a DMMS like a blockchain or braid)11:45
gavinandresenphantomcircuit: mining nodes hiding among lots of nodes for DoS resistance is a good point. But it probably makes more economic sense for them to just spin up a few hundred nodes instead of trying to find a scheme to incentivize people to run relay nodes.11:46
gavinandresen(note I said probably, I could easily change my mind)11:46
phantomcircuitgavinandresen, ddos filtering for bitcoin traffic is crazy expensive11:47
gavinandresenMaybe not a coincidence that btcc just announced they're running a bunch of full nodes....11:47
phantomcircuiti suspect that had something to do with trying to improve relaying of their pools blocks11:49
phantomcircuiti also suspect it wont do that but whatever11:50
phantomcircuitgavinandresen, DDoS protection for anything except http/https is very very expensive11:52
kanzurewhy would micropayments work for transaction relaying? wouldn't most people just use free relays? or is the idea that all the free relayers would evaporate over time?11:52
phantomcircuitit's pretty cheap if nobody can figure out how to target you though11:52
kanzurethe reason why relay nodes are necessary is because you don't necessarily know the next miner11:53
kanzure"resistance against detection" seems like a backwards reason to me :P11:54
-!- Logicwax [~Logicwax@c-76-126-174-152.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:54
kanzureif you know the set of miners who will in 99.99999999% likelihood generate the next block, then something has gone terribly wrong i think11:54
-!- Logicwax [~Logicwax@c-76-126-174-152.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:54
phantomcircuitkanzure, also that11:56
phantomcircuitkanzure, resistance to detection is also important though11:56
-!- Guest53483 [~psztorc@ool-4575fa8d.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]11:56
kanzureyea i agree, but i think it wont communicate anything meaningful to gavinandresen :-)11:56
phantomcircuityou can buy a ddos from shady .su sites for like $5 that will knock out most servers11:56
kanzureoh right.11:56
phantomcircuitironically they all only take bitcoin now11:57
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]11:57
-!- Guest53483 [~psztorc@69.117.250.141] has joined #bitcoin-wizards11:57
kanzureseems sort of self-defeating11:57
bsm117532This argument is circular: you need a relay network to protect (centralized) miners from DDoS, but you only get mining centralization if you have a relay network. If everyone HAD to mine to participate in the network, it would be more decentralized, and you wouldn't need free relay.11:57
bsm117532Outsourcing mining is left as an exercise to the reader.11:58
gavinandresenbsm117532: you're ignoring the possiblity that if everybody HAD to mine to participate, you'd end up with nobody participating.11:59
gavinandresenI'm not saying that's what WOULD happen....12:00
* nsh nods12:00
bsm117532I'd participate.12:00
* bsm117532 strokes his cute little 21.co mining computer on his desk.12:00
bsm117532gavinandresen: I'm not saying that all fees must be paid by mining.  I'm saying everyone must mine a *little* (even if it's CPU mining).  That incentivizes everyone to up their mining game, at the edges of the network.12:01
nsh'everyone' precludes any thin-clients / spv nodes etc.12:02
nshwhich is a big pain in the arse for PoS and other use-cases12:03
bsm117532nsh I'm excluding spv nodes from this argument.12:03
nshok12:03
bsm117532That's a different threat model.12:03
nshthe threats have an annoying indifference to which way they're modelled in practice :)12:06
-!- nabu [~nabu@179.43.156.130] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]12:07
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@46.166.188.220] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]12:11
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Quit: Leaving]12:17
-!- PeterR [18721bb0@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.114.27.176] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:18
-!- nuke1989 [~nuke@178-157-152.dynamic.cyta.gr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:19
PeterRJannes: using estimates for average network latency and propagation impedance from G. Andrew Stone's recent paper, orphan rate would be ~20% with 8 MB blocks.12:20
PeterRSee Section 6 here:12:20
PeterRhttp://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/public/downloads/subchains.pdf12:20
PeterRHere is the paper from Stone:12:22
PeterRhttp://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/1txn/12:22
bsm117532*sigh* I'm gonna have to read those, aren't I...12:23
PeterRMine has pretty pictures :-)12:23
bsm117532PeterR you and I are going to end up debating subchains vs. braids soon.12:24
PeterRYes, I'm quite interested in braids actually.  Planning to learn more about them in the next few weeks...12:24
-!- psztorc [~psztorc@ool-4575fa8d.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:24
gavinandresen... I'll bring the popcorn and see if the GHOST protocol and Emin/Ittay will debate, too....12:24
-!- psztorc is now known as Guest3759212:25
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/erasmospunk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:25
bsm117532I'm pretty down on GHOST and related papers because of selfish mining.12:27
-!- Guest53483 [~psztorc@69.117.250.141] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]12:28
-!- Guest37592 is now known as Guest5348312:28
gavinandresenI keep getting distracted, but I've been meaning to try to get together a data set that could be used as a common measuring stick for different ideas for how to optimize information propagation across the network and the process of coming to consensus12:29
-!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:33
nsha data set? i'd have imagined a dynamic simulation would be necessary in most cases12:34
nshor do you mean to a data set to use in simulation?12:34
gavinandresena data set to use in simulation, so apples-to-apples comparisons can be done.12:34
-!- MrHodl [~fuc@5.175.207.98] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:34
* nsh nods12:35
gavinandresenIdeally a data set that reflects actual transaction volume patterns....12:35
gavinandresen(or IS actual transactions)12:35
nshright. good idea12:35
bsm117532Someone has a large dataset...mentioned at Scaling Bitcoin...trying to recall who it is.  kanzure do you have the link?12:35
gavinandresenrusty has mempool data12:35
gavinandresen(that includes when his nodes first saw transactions, if I recall correctly)12:37
gavinandresenCoinScope project has a lot of data, too.... as I said, I keep getting distracted, haven't put it together....12:37
PeterRgavinandresen: good idea.  There are lots of performance metrics: orphan races, marginal orphaning risk (fee density), zero-confirm security (if any), selfish mining deterrence.12:38
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r186-55-160-144.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:39
bsm117532I'm pretty sure it was jtoomim.12:39
PeterRWould be good to compare each under apple-to-apples conditions.12:39
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:39
bsm117532Here's the transcript of his talk http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/bip101-block-propagation-data-from-testnet/12:41
-!- PeterR [18721bb0@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.114.27.176] has quit [Quit: Page closed]12:46
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79.98.72.216] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:49
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79.98.72.216] has quit [Changing host]12:49
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:49
-!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards12:55
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]13:04
-!- atgreen [~green@209.171.88.190] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]13:05
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:09
-!- binaryFate [~binaryFat@90.54.245.29] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:15
-!- Quanttek [~quassel@2a02:8108:73f:f6e4:e23f:49ff:fe47:9364] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]13:15
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:22
kanzureno it wasn't jtoomim13:37
kanzurei mean, he did have a data set, but the one you are thinking of is rusty's corpus13:37
-!- brianhof_ [~brianhoff@pool-173-79-161-229.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:37
kanzurehttps://github.com/rustyrussell/bitcoin-corpus and https://github.com/chr15m/bitcoin-notebook13:37
kanzurehttp://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/invertible-bloom-lookup-tables-and-weak-block-propagation-performance/13:37
kanzurethere was also the dataset that gmaxwell was using http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/gmaxwell-2015-11-09-mining-and-block-size-etc/13:38
kanzurewhich is definitely not the one you are thinking about13:39
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/erasmospunk] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:39
-!- brianhoffman [~brianhoff@185.94.28.254] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]13:40
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]13:44
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:45
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@213.107.7.229] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:46
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@213.107.7.229] has quit [Changing host]13:46
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:46
-!- sipi [~sipi@ip-195-14-160-197.bnk.lt] has quit [Quit: Leaving]13:46
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]13:49
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has quit [Quit: Leaving]13:51
-!- zookolaptop [~user@5.80.175.172] has joined #bitcoin-wizards13:53
-!- Jeremy_Rand_2 [~user@ip68-97-45-209.ok.ok.cox.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]13:53
-!- GAit1 [~GAit@2.230.161.158] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:02
-!- Xzibit17_ [sid50165@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ijaowonaoxogzjnd] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:04
-!- PsychoticBoy_ [sid27029@pdpc/supporter/active/psychoticboy] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:04
-!- lmatteis_ [uid3300@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-bilzeiiwhrnpnyef] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:04
-!- runeks_ [sid21167@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vkybzabbrthcmgdw] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:04
-!- lmatteis [uid3300@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-aqsoakwhqcyakbhs] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- harrow [~harrow@105.ip-167-114-152.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- mr_burdell [~mr_burdel@unaffiliated/mr-burdell/x-7609603] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- lmatteis_ is now known as lmatteis14:04
-!- e0 [~e0@cs10-dhcp123.bu.edu] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- hopey [1000@valtio.org] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- Xzibit17 [sid50165@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tgmqsbpgjqghkpfd] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- mr_burdell_ [~mr_burdel@bounce.cryptolabs.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:04
-!- wpalczynski_ [sid55851@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-jfidwbskjzemppdt] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:04
-!- e0 [~e0@cs10-dhcp123.bu.edu] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:04
-!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- PsychoticBoy [sid27029@pdpc/supporter/active/psychoticboy] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- aj [~aj@106.187.51.212] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- runeks [sid21167@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-sqgczzaoepxroayo] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:04
-!- mr_burdell_ is now known as mr_burdell14:05
-!- hopey [1000@valtio.org] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:05
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:05
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-spiamdwqmbewlcmt] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:05
-!- Fredaz [~Fredaz__@2001:1900:2104:2::86] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:05
-!- Jaamg [jhpiloma@gateway/shell/tkk.fi/x-mavjdcrywnafnzez] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:05
-!- Xzibit17_ is now known as Xzibit1714:05
-!- Jaamg [jhpiloma@gateway/shell/tkk.fi/x-lywwiwyoqsgwpfig] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:05
-!- runeks_ is now known as runeks14:05
-!- mr_burdell is now known as Guest3145614:05
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:05
-!- wpalczynski [sid55851@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-otbxjbrersacdfui] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]14:05
-!- aj [aj@106.187.51.212] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:06
-!- harrow [~harrow@105.ip-167-114-152.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:06
-!- wpalczynski_ is now known as wpalczynski14:06
-!- PsychoticBoy_ is now known as PsychoticBoy14:06
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:06
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/erasmospunk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:09
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]14:11
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]14:11
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:11
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Changing host]14:11
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:11
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xgrvejxejsnxbgzm] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:19
-!- Fredaz [~Fredaz__@2001:1900:2104:2::86] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:19
-!- c0rw|away is now known as c0rw|scrollback14:20
-!- melvster1 [~melvster@86.49.18.198] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:23
-!- brg444 [415ce066@gateway/web/freenode/ip.65.92.224.102] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:24
-!- Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has quit [Quit: :)]14:25
-!- Emcy [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:32
-!- Emcy [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Changing host]14:32
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:32
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]14:32
-!- jtimon [~quassel@103.red-80-26-235.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]14:33
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]14:35
-!- c0rw|scrollback is now known as c0rw1n14:38
bsm117532Ledger Journal (ledgerjournal.org) has extended the submission deadline for the inaugural edition to Jan 15.  For those of you working on papers.  Hop to it!14:38
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:39
-!- PeterR [cdfa7ea5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.205.250.126.165] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:40
-!- Heliox_ is now known as Heliox14:40
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r186-55-160-144.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has quit [Quit: Leaving]14:42
PeterRbsm117532: to clarify, the editorial team *may* consider submissions up to Jan 15 for the first edition, contingent upon timely peer review, and whether the paper helps to "balance" the spectrum of topics covered.14:43
moabsm117532: anonymous review?14:44
PeterRSingle-blind14:44
PeterRHigh-quality papers are always welcome of course!14:45
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]14:45
moalike with colourful animations and etc?14:46
PeterR:-)14:47
bsm117532PeterR: my braids paper is coming your way.14:48
bsm117532Just trying to stir the pot and get more things in this space peer reviewed.  ;-)14:48
PeterRLooking forward to it!14:49
bsm117532Also would be happy to review...14:49
bsm117532You've got a pretty big editorial board though, I imagine you've got it covered for the inagural issue ;-)14:50
moapeer-to-peer review14:50
PeterRAre you registered as an author already?  If you're not, please do so and send me a note with your reviewing interests, and I will add you to our reviewer database.14:51
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-143-141.as13285.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]14:51
bsm117532I am registerd.14:51
PeterRLet me know your name and I'll add reviewer credentials to your account.14:53
PeterRAcutally, I just figured who you were out on my own :)14:55
bsm117532sending you a mail.  I haven't been hiding my identity really...14:56
AdrianGPeterR: PeterR when is the first edition comping out14:56
AdrianGcoming out*14:57
PeterROK, you're now in our reviewer database.  It would be great if you could login and add your "reviewing interests" to your account.14:57
-!- JackH [~Jack@host-80-43-143-141.as13285.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:57
PeterRAdrianG: We're aiming for the spring.  April or May.  But since this is our first time, we're unsure how long it will take to push everything through peer-review and through copy-editting.14:58
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:59
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@cpc3-swan1-0-0-cust996.7-3.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Changing host]14:59
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards14:59
-!- oneeman [~oneeman@ip48-68-15-186.ct.co.cr] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:00
-!- stevenroose [~steven@193.190.253.144] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:00
-!- stevenroose|BNC is now known as stevenroose15:00
-!- stevenroose [stevenroos@bnc1.sollidi.us] has quit [Disconnected by services]15:01
moaPeterR do you need a copy-editor?15:02
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]15:02
-!- PeterR [cdfa7ea5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.205.250.126.165] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]15:05
-!- AaronvanW [~ewout@unaffiliated/aaronvanw] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]15:13
-!- Erik_dc [~erik@d54c620ed.access.telenet.be] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]15:14
-!- murch [~murch@p4FE38D40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]15:14
-!- erasmospunk [~erasmospu@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/erasmospunk] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]15:18
-!- smk [052d4a6b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.45.74.107] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:35
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit []15:35
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]15:36
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:36
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:36
-!- gielbier [~giel____@unaffiliated/gielbier] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]15:46
-!- stevenroose|BNC [stevenroos@bnc1.sollidi.us] has joined #bitcoin-wizards15:53
-!- smk [052d4a6b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.45.74.107] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]15:55
-!- dcousens [~anon@110.22.219.15] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:01
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]16:04
-!- binaryFate [~binaryFat@90.54.245.29] has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]16:05
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:08
-!- r0ach [~r0ach@107-217-214-192.lightspeed.jcvlfl.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:30
-!- mrkent_ [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:34
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:34
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]16:34
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]16:35
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:39
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]16:39
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:39
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]16:39
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:40
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@i118-19-237-2.s41.a020.ap.plala.or.jp] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]16:40
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:40
-!- atgreen [~green@CPE687f74122463-CM00fc8d24cab0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:40
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-125-203.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: GGuyZ]16:45
-!- Yoghur114_2 [~jorn@g227014.upc-g.chello.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:47
-!- zookolaptop [~user@5.80.175.172] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]16:48
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]16:48
-!- alpalp [~alp@104-54-235-28.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]16:53
-!- bsm117532 is now known as Guest3842316:53
-!- Guest38423 [~mcelrath@38.121.165.30] has quit [Killed (kornbluth.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services))]16:53
-!- bsm1175321 is now known as bsm11753216:53
-!- alpalp [~alp@104-54-235-28.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:54
-!- bsm1175321 [~mcelrath@38.121.165.30] has joined #bitcoin-wizards16:54
nshso chaum lost the plot, or what?16:58
merlincoreyhaha yeah16:59
merlincoreyI saw that16:59
bsm117532 Saw what?16:59
nshprobably the media hype is obscuring a potentially viable concept17:00
nshbut some notion of a mixnet that would obviate the need for tor/i2p, with no noticeable delay/latency and requiring just 9 servers in heterogenous legal regimes17:01
nshi haven't read the paper. being presented at Real World Crypto in Stanford today17:01
nshbut it's not getting a great reception already17:01
@gwillenwell, I gotta say, I don't like the key escrow part of it17:01
@gwillen"Chaum is also building into PrivaTegrity another feature that’s sure to be far more controversial: a carefully controlled backdoor that allows anyone doing something “generally recognized as evil” to have their anonymity and privacy stripped altogether."17:02
nsh( http://www.wired.com/2016/01/david-chaum-father-of-online-anonymity-plan-to-end-the-crypto-wars/ )17:02
* gwillen only just started reading in response to nsh's message just now17:02
* nsh nods17:02
-!- mode/#bitcoin-wizards [-o gwillen] by gwillen17:02
gwillenI wonder if he decided to call that a feature because it's a sort of inherent property of the system he built, so may as well try to rebrand it17:03
nshpossibly. i'm trying to reserve judgement on the hopes that the presentation is recorded and will be made public17:04
* gwillen nods17:05
-!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-45-58-254-230.dyn.295.ca] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:05
gwillenI wouldn't say he's lost the plot but I think he's not taking social factors into account adequately17:05
gwillenwhich is a common problem...17:05
gwillenmixnets are already pretty specialized, normal internet users expect low latency17:06
gwillenand the kind of people who would use a mixnet will not stand for a backdoored one17:06
phantomcircuitlol17:07
phantomcircuittv show, murder during a treasure hunt in manhatten, prize at the end is a flash drive with bitcoins on it17:07
phantomcircuitamusingly this actually makes total sense17:07
phantomcircuitoops wrong channel17:07
gwillenhahahaha, hi phantomcircuit  :-)17:08
* phantomcircuit waves to gwillen 17:08
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@unaffiliated/voxelot] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]17:09
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:14
-!- jaekwon [~jaekwon@75-101-96-71.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]17:20
nshgwillen, agreed. sounds like a political solution to a technical problem from an expert in the technical and not the political/social17:22
nshyou can achieve a lot if you're allowed to assume some subset of parties will never collude17:22
nshbut extending that to the anonymity of the internet is a pretty breathtaking stretch17:22
-!- Tenhi [~tenhi@static-ip-69-64-50-196.inaddr.ip-pool.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]17:24
-!- Tenhi_ is now known as Tenhi17:24
-!- Tenhi_ [~tenhi@static-ip-69-64-50-196.inaddr.ip-pool.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:25
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]17:34
jcorganinb4 all the pols say, "See we told you it was possible, David Chaum, one of you, says so!"17:34
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:38
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xgrvejxejsnxbgzm] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]17:44
nshor maybe he's playing a corker of a double-bluff, and is setting this project up to fail like the clipper chip17:46
dcousensnsh: not as uncommon as you'd think17:47
-!- smk [052d4853@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.45.72.83] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:47
moaOP_BLINDSIGN17:48
-!- pozitrono [~nu@108.61.123.66] has joined #bitcoin-wizards17:57
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-125-203.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:01
-!- dEBRUYNE [~dEBRUYNE@56-197-ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl] has quit [Quit: Leaving]18:04
-!- c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|zZz18:12
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@c-67-168-82-178.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]18:13
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:23
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:23
-!- mrkent_ [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]18:25
-!- Emcy_ [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]18:26
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]18:27
-!- stevenroose|BNC is now known as stevenroose18:33
-!- smk [052d4853@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.45.72.83] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]18:42
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-125-203.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: GGuyZ]18:49
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:49
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]18:51
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]18:53
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards18:53
-!- Burrito [~Burrito@unaffiliated/burrito] has quit [Quit: Leaving]18:58
-!- p15 [~p15@37.91.145.64.client.static.strong-tk2.bringover.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:02
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]19:04
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:08
-!- dcousens [~anon@110.22.219.15] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]19:10
-!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:16
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]19:17
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-125-203.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:22
-!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]19:22
-!- GGuyZ [~GGuyZ@216-15-125-203.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Client Quit]19:25
-!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:25
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:30
-!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]19:36
-!- brg444 [415ce066@gateway/web/freenode/ip.65.92.224.102] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]19:44
-!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-wizards19:50
-!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]20:00
-!- Emcy [~MC@unaffiliated/mc1984] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]20:04
-!- licnep [uid4387@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-moqvlkpwaialahua] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]20:06
-!- lknkln [48e3ab76@gateway/web/freenode/ip.72.227.171.118] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:11
lknklnhello20:12
-!- lknkln [48e3ab76@gateway/web/freenode/ip.72.227.171.118] has quit [Client Quit]20:12
-!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-139-55-215-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]20:18
-!- mrkent [~textual@unaffiliated/mrkent] has quit []20:20
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]20:25
-!- TheSeven [~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:27
-!- c-cex-yuriy [uid76808@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ynjseosftscphjwy] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]20:32
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]20:34
-!- r0ach [~r0ach@107-217-214-192.lightspeed.jcvlfl.sbcglobal.net] has quit []20:34
-!- Guest53483 [~psztorc@ool-4575fa8d.dyn.optonline.net] has quit [Quit: HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- It'll be on slashdot one day...]20:35
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:39
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@2606:6000:6793:a800:8dc1:9805:e1aa:eac7] has joined #bitcoin-wizards20:57
-!- dcousens [~anon@c110-22-219-15.sunsh4.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:05
-!- oneeman [~oneeman@ip48-68-15-186.ct.co.cr] has quit [Quit: Leaving]21:14
-!- Dizzle [~Dizzle@2605:6000:1018:c0b1:c5c:de9c:8632:30a1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:20
-!- nuke1989 [~nuke@178-157-152.dynamic.cyta.gr] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]21:25
-!- voxelot [~voxelot@2606:6000:6793:a800:8dc1:9805:e1aa:eac7] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]21:50
-!- davec [~davec@cpe-24-243-251-52.hot.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]21:50
-!- davec [~davec@cpe-24-243-251-52.hot.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards21:50
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]22:03
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:09
-!- bit2017 [~linker@171.250.100.43] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]22:12
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]22:15
-!- moa [~kiwigb@opentransactions/dev/moa] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:15
-!- paleh0rse [~opet@108.61.68.151] has quit []22:31
-!- hashtag_ [~hashtag@cpe-174-97-254-80.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]22:35
-!- Ylbam [uid99779@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rjlbmlhtvtlfghuk] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:35
-!- hashtag_ [~hashtag@cpe-174-97-254-80.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:35
-!- sparetire [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]22:39
-!- Yoghur114 [~Yoghurt11@131.224.198.111] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]22:42
-!- Yoghur114 [~Yoghurt11@131.224.198.111] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:42
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:45
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@79-98-72-216.sys-data.com] has quit [Changing host]22:45
-!- paveljanik [~paveljani@unaffiliated/paveljanik] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:45
-!- wiretapp [~wiretap@d206-116-41-57.bchsia.telus.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:46
wiretapphello22:46
-!- hashtag_ [~hashtag@cpe-174-97-254-80.ma.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]22:52
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]22:52
-!- sparetire [~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:52
-!- DougieBot5000 [~DougieBot@unaffiliated/dougiebot5000] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:52
-!- hashtag_ [~hashtag@cpe-174-97-254-80.ma.res.rr.com] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:53
-!- risho [~quassel@c-73-252-176-148.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]22:55
-!- CubicEarth [~cubiceart@c-67-168-82-178.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:55
-!- risho [~quassel@c-73-252-176-148.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:56
-!- bit2017 [~linker@210.245.34.191] has joined #bitcoin-wizards22:59
-!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]23:01
-!- justanot1eruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:02
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]23:02
-!- markus-k [~markus-k@designnet.work.de] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:07
-!- trippysalmon [rob@2001:984:6466:0:51d:b5ab:ab61:bed8] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:11
-!- justanot1eruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Quit: leaving]23:16
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@ip70-187-8-107.om.om.cox.net] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:16
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@ip70-187-8-107.om.om.cox.net] has quit [Signing in (justanotheruser)]23:16
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:16
-!- ThomasV [~ThomasV@unaffiliated/thomasv] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:32
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]23:35
-!- tjader [~tjader@189.60.213.1] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:39
-!- tucenaber [~tucenaber@unaffiliated/tucenaber] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]23:40
-!- coins123 [~coins123@62.94.244.225] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:45
-!- wallet42 [~wallet42@5.9.25.103] has joined #bitcoin-wizards23:48
-!- wiretapp [~wiretap@d206-116-41-57.bchsia.telus.net] has left #bitcoin-wizards []23:59
--- Log closed Thu Jan 07 00:00:58 2016

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!