--- Log opened Fri Dec 13 00:00:35 2019 08:15 -!- andytoshi [~apoelstra@wpsoftware.net] has joined #bitmetas 08:15 -!- andytoshi [~apoelstra@wpsoftware.net] has quit [Changing host] 08:15 -!- andytoshi [~apoelstra@unaffiliated/andytoshi] has joined #bitmetas 11:14 -!- jonatack [~jon@2a01:e0a:53c:a200:bb54:3be5:c3d0:9ce5] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 11:49 < real_or_random> here's something I'd like to discuss before I open a PR 11:54 < real_or_random> my feeling is that in bip-schnorr it would be a more appropriate representation of reality to add nickler and me as co-authors next to sipa (I think we three somewhat stand out of the crowd, feel free to object). I've mentioned this to them already: I was going to propose this in a PR but I'm not sure how this would look if we don't do appropriate changes in the other two drafts. (I can't judge exactly what the corresponding change would be for 11:54 < real_or_random> the other two bips but I assume aj would be part of it) 11:55 < real_or_random> so we could either change the other BIPs too, only change bip-schnorr, leave everything as is, or do something else. any opinions? 11:56 < real_or_random> I certainly don't want to force anything upon people, so that's why I ask here first. 11:59 < sipa> fwiw, i certainly think more people than just me deserve authorship in the bips 11:59 < sipa> it's just hard to draw the line 12:05 -!- jonatack [~jon@2a01:e0a:53c:a200:bb54:3be5:c3d0:9ce5] has joined #bitmetas 12:11 < sipa> ok, so looking at "git blame" for the 3 documents, as well as the pre-published versions, i propose: bip-schnorr(me,jonas,tim), bip-taproot(me,jonas,aj), bip-tapscript(me,jonas) 12:12 < sipa> that's an attempt at doing it objectively, but it's not perfect 12:12 < sipa> feel free to suggest something else if you feel something is unfair 12:25 < real_or_random> git blame is a somewhat weird metric because it captures only the latest changes and also line lengths are very different (a few words to an entire paragraph) at least in bip-schnorr 12:26 < real_or_random> but yeah, it coincides with my intuition at least ^^ 12:50 < nickler> jl2012 should also deserve attribution, way more than me for bip-taproot/script. 12:50 < nickler> sipa: when git blaming did you take into account that you squashed the work we did before the bips were published? 12:51 < sipa> nickler: yes 12:51 < jl2012> nickler: thanks but there is no need for that 12:53 < sipa> blame on the pre-published version of bip-taproot: 12:53 < sipa> $ git blame bip-taproot.mediawiki | cut -c 33-45 | sort | uniq -c | sort -g 12:53 < sipa> 15 Johnson Lau 12:53 < sipa> 27 Anthony Towns 12:53 < sipa> 52 Jonas Nick 12:53 < sipa> 189 Pieter Wuille 12:53 < sipa> $ git blame bip-tapscript.mediawiki | cut -c 36-49 | sort | uniq -c | sort -g 12:53 < sipa> 1 Anthony Towns 12:53 < sipa> 19 Jonas Nick 12:53 < sipa> 45 Johnson Lau 12:53 < sipa> 82 Pieter Wuille 13:02 < real_or_random> jl2012: simply "no need" or would you actually mind being mentioned? 13:04 < jl2012> Preferred to be not mentioned 13:06 < real_or_random> ok I see 16:11 -!- achow101_ [~achow101@unaffiliated/achow101] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 16:37 -!- achow101 [~achow101@unaffiliated/achow101] has joined #bitmetas 17:22 -!- achow101 [~achow101@unaffiliated/achow101] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 17:25 -!- achow101 [~achow101@unaffiliated/achow101] has joined #bitmetas --- Log closed Sat Dec 14 00:00:37 2019