--- Log opened Sat Jan 23 00:00:24 2021 00:09 -!- mryandao_ [~mryandao@gateway/tor-sasl/mryandao] has joined #c-lightning 00:11 -!- DeanWeen [~dean@gateway/tor-sasl/deanguss] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 00:12 -!- DeanGuss [~dean@gateway/tor-sasl/deanguss] has joined #c-lightning 00:12 -!- mryandao [~mryandao@gateway/tor-sasl/mryandao] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 00:20 -!- shesek [~shesek@unaffiliated/shesek] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 00:30 -!- vasild [~vd@gateway/tor-sasl/vasild] has quit [Disconnected by services] 00:30 -!- vasild_ [~vd@gateway/tor-sasl/vasild] has joined #c-lightning 00:30 -!- vasild_ is now known as vasild 01:11 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 01:12 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has joined #c-lightning 02:12 < HelloShitty> nibbier: is it possible to know why I paid like 25k sats for a rebalancing of 200k sats? I mean, I may find the last failed attempt for this rebalance and check the channels it went through. Was it possible, by checking these channels fees, to evaluate the fees along the way? Or it doesn't work that way? 02:24 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-qtzfkbumkrmirmay] has left #c-lightning [] 02:24 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-qtzfkbumkrmirmay] has joined #c-lightning 03:11 -!- mryandao_ is now known as mryanado 03:34 -!- liberliver [~Thunderbi@144.49.211.130.bc.googleusercontent.com] has joined #c-lightning 03:35 -!- jonatack [~jon@109.232.227.138] has joined #c-lightning 05:49 < blockstream_bot> [cg-tabet, Blockstream] While the other node is offline, how to `force close` the channel? Is `close` sufficient for force closing? Thanks. 06:55 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 06:56 -!- bitdex [~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex] has joined #c-lightning 07:10 -!- belcher_ is now known as belcher 07:11 < blockstream_bot> [cg-tabet, Blockstream] Sergi Delgado: teosd watchtower was able to publish a punishment Tx, and I was expected that it will keep some fee (reward) for itself, but I found that teosd was working for free. How to set a fee (reward) to teosd when sending a punishment Tx? Thanks. 09:35 -!- Victorsueca [~Victorsue@unaffiliated/victorsueca] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 09:36 -!- sr_gi [~sr_gi@static-6-109-229-77.ipcom.comunitel.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 09:36 -!- sr_gi [~sr_gi@static-6-109-229-77.ipcom.comunitel.net] has joined #c-lightning 09:54 <@cdecker> cg-tabet: close is sufficient, but by default we give the peers 2 days to come back online before we force close. See https://lightning.readthedocs.io/lightning-close.7.html for all parameters and their semantics :-) 09:55 -!- shesek [~shesek@unaffiliated/shesek] has joined #c-lightning 10:27 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-qtzfkbumkrmirmay] has left #c-lightning [] 10:27 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-qtzfkbumkrmirmay] has joined #c-lightning 11:04 -!- windsok [~windsok@unaffiliated/windsok] has joined #c-lightning 11:08 -!- Clali [~clali@wall.seedhost.eu] has joined #c-lightning 11:11 -!- _0x0ff [~potatoe@unaffiliated/0x0ff/x-1210984] has joined #c-lightning 11:17 -!- earnestly [~earnestly@unaffiliated/earnestly] has joined #c-lightning 11:21 < Clali> Is there a good breakdown/analysis of lightening networks privacy available? One that is more undergrad level than the terrible ELI5 ones knocking around 11:22 < Clali> My precise question is, could you compare the privacy afforded by lightening to that afforded by a signal group? 12:20 < nibbier> HelloShitty: I guess it's possible to find out, but I would now know how 12:21 -!- liberliver [~Thunderbi@144.49.211.130.bc.googleusercontent.com] has quit [Quit: liberliver] 12:30 -!- vasild [~vd@gateway/tor-sasl/vasild] has quit [Disconnected by services] 12:30 -!- vasild_ [~vd@gateway/tor-sasl/vasild] has joined #c-lightning 12:30 -!- vasild_ is now known as vasild 15:02 -!- zmnscpxj [~zmnscpxj@gateway/tor-sasl/zmnscpxj] has joined #c-lightning 17:57 -!- sr_gi [~sr_gi@static-6-109-229-77.ipcom.comunitel.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 17:57 -!- sr_gi [~sr_gi@static-6-109-229-77.ipcom.comunitel.net] has joined #c-lightning 18:21 -!- zmnscpxj [~zmnscpxj@gateway/tor-sasl/zmnscpxj] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 18:21 -!- zmnscpxj [~zmnscpxj@gateway/tor-sasl/zmnscpxj] has joined #c-lightning 18:38 -!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has joined #c-lightning 18:44 -!- rusty [~rusty@pdpc/supporter/bronze/rusty] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 18:47 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-qtzfkbumkrmirmay] has left #c-lightning [] 18:47 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-qtzfkbumkrmirmay] has joined #c-lightning 19:08 -!- earnestly [~earnestly@unaffiliated/earnestly] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 20:13 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-qtzfkbumkrmirmay] has left #c-lightning [] 20:13 -!- blockstream_bot [blockstrea@gateway/shell/sameroom/x-qtzfkbumkrmirmay] has joined #c-lightning 20:29 -!- az0re [~az0re@gateway/tor-sasl/az0re] has joined #c-lightning 20:53 < az0re> So what is the status of anchor commitments? Can someone please point me to the relevant issues/PRs/branches? 21:37 -!- belcher_ [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #c-lightning 21:39 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] --- Log closed Sun Jan 24 00:00:24 2021