--- Log opened Tue Apr 20 00:00:31 2021 06:53 <+JoinMarketRelay> [hackint/mojo_] Question: Does this 1000 sats imply the fees paid in contract transaction? 06:53 <+JoinMarketRelay> [hackint/mojo_] https://github.com/mojoX911/teleport-transactions/blob/f6878d7a47e9f05b5453c610b5edd97d0a0b3de5/src/contracts.rs#L147 07:56 < belcher> mojo_ yes thats the miner fee, which right now is just hard coded as you see but one of the TODOs is to handle miner fees properly 07:57 < belcher> obviously that code right now wouldnt work well on mainnet because 1000 sat miner fee may or may not be enough to get a confirmation 08:01 <+JoinMarketRelay> [hackint/mojo_] Thanks. Ya makes sense. 08:33 <+JoinMarketRelay> [hackint/mojo_] If i understand it correctly, the protocol design suggests that receiver and sender will have different contract transaction for the same funding outpoint. But this is not yet implemented. Is that correct? 08:34 < belcher> yes thats right 08:35 < belcher> its implemented in the sense that there are seperate functions `create_senders_contract_tx` and `create_receivers_contract_tx`, but right now they create exactly the same transaction 08:35 < belcher> the receivers contract txes will use "collateral inputs", a thing that was required to be invented to solve one attack 15:20 -!- thorie [~thorie@76-226-84-35.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 17:01 -!- belcher_ [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined ##coinswap 17:04 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 17:11 -!- belcher_ is now known as belcher --- Log closed Wed Apr 21 00:00:32 2021