--- Log opened Sat Sep 12 00:00:16 2020 00:22 -!- jonatack [~jon@2a01:e0a:53c:a200:bb54:3be5:c3d0:9ce5] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 00:23 -!- fjahr [sid374480@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vddusacsufeecjsf] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 00:24 -!- fjahr [sid374480@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-iivtmbwrteacwior] has joined ##hwi 01:23 -!- jonatack [~jon@37.173.136.184] has joined ##hwi 04:46 -!- jonatack [~jon@37.173.136.184] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 07:06 -!- jonatack [~jon@static-176-139-55-163.ftth.abo.bbox.fr] has joined ##hwi 07:10 -!- jonatack [~jon@static-176-139-55-163.ftth.abo.bbox.fr] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 07:12 -!- jonatack [~jon@109.232.227.138] has joined ##hwi 08:26 -!- jonatack [~jon@109.232.227.138] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 09:10 < achow101> instagibbs: any idea why ledger signing performance would be a lot slower on HWI than on electrum? 09:10 < achow101> see https://blog.keys.casa/bitcoin-multisig-hardware-signing-performance/, towards the bottom 09:17 -!- jonatack [~jon@2a01:e0a:53c:a200:bb54:3be5:c3d0:9ce5] has joined ##hwi 11:49 < instagibbs> would help to have a parallel API to time usage. HWI is just a thin-ish wrapper around a vendored version of their same python lib 17:23 < ghost43> did he try signing the exact same transactions? e.g. the size of the prevout tx (non_witness_utxo) probably matters a lot. e.g. consider signing a 100 input tx where each prevout tx is a small 1-in-1-out, vs 100 input tx where all prevouts are from a huge tx that created lots outputs batched 23:48 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: wumpus 23:48 -!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: ghost43, jb55 23:52 -!- jonatack [~jon@2a01:e0a:53c:a200:bb54:3be5:c3d0:9ce5] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] --- Log closed Sun Sep 13 00:00:17 2020