--- Day changed Tue Jun 14 2016
03:17 < waxwing> raedah: thanks for heads up
03:24 < waxwing> been running a yg on two IRC channels for several days now, it's done a bunch of transactions and seems OK. Is anyone else willing to join me in that test? See https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket/pull/568
03:27 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has joined #joinmarket
03:42 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@80.red-79-151-141.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has quit []
03:45 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@80.red-79-151-141.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has joined #joinmarket
03:51 -!- lnostdal [~lnostdal@99-102-11.connect.netcom.no] has joined #joinmarket
04:06 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
04:23 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@197.93.138.137] has joined #joinmarket
04:23 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@197.93.138.137] has quit [Changing host]
04:23 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has joined #joinmarket
04:35 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
04:43 < belcher_> the #156 spy seems to have gone ?
04:43 < belcher_> waxwing: ill test with you soonish, been super busy lately
04:44 < waxwing> belcher_: hey, no problem.
04:44 < waxwing> i just started looking at the wallet sync process again. melts my brain :)
04:45 < belcher_> yeah its a mess, maybe i should fix it since i wrote it
04:46 < waxwing> well either way i have to understand it. i'm trying to write a test that simulates restart (without actually restarting)
04:46 < belcher_> ok
04:46 < waxwing> once it works i can set all kinds of conditions on it and try to get it working properly in spammer presence. that's the goal anyway.
04:48 < belcher_> yeah
04:49 < belcher_> well yeah fixing/improving 156 is a priority now
04:49 < belcher_> that its been exploited
04:49 < belcher_> i wonder if that was just a warning shot
04:50 < belcher_> bbl
04:50 < waxwing> k, cya
04:55 < waxwing> hmm i just noticed that's an anagram of сука , even american teenagers know what that means :)
05:05 < GithubBot5678> [joinmarket] chris-belcher closed pull request #569: yieldgens: fix issue 567 for max_size orders (develop...fix_issue_567) https://git.io/voZbu
05:09 < pigeons> far from teenager so i had to duckduckgo it
05:25 -!- lnostdal [~lnostdal@99-102-11.connect.netcom.no] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
05:40 -!- puddinpop [~puddinpop@unaffiliated/puddinpop] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
05:57 -!- puddinpop [~puddinpop@unaffiliated/puddinpop] has joined #joinmarket
06:11 < waxwing> hmm, it's looking like the behaviour of syncing is not as intended: if the last few updates to the cache were not in completed txs, then those addresses will not appear in used_addr_list during sync_addresses, which means the new setting of the index, based on last_used_addr, will not take those requests into account.
06:14 < waxwing> https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket/blob/develop/joinmarket/blockchaininterface.py#L641 that line
06:15 < waxwing> to be clear, you only break out of the loop once you're ahead of the cache, but the setting is not based on the final index (the cache value), but the last used address (as measured by doing listtransactions)
06:58 -!- lnostdal [~lnostdal@99-102-11.connect.netcom.no] has joined #joinmarket
07:13 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has joined #joinmarket
07:57 -!- fqtw [~me@x5d80780c.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket
07:57 < fqtw> is there a windows binary for joinmarket?
08:02 < waxwing> https://github.com/Joinmarket-Org/jmbinary fqtw take a look there
09:34 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@80.red-79-151-141.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has quit []
10:00 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@96.red-79-151-27.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has joined #joinmarket
10:33 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] interesting. I'm trying to send funds from my first YG to the 2nd for the message channel tests
10:34 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] and run into the "not enough funds" error from that issue: https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket/issues/570 . Even though i'm only sending 0.9 btc from a mixdepth that contains >2 btc
10:39 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] though some of the btcs in that mixdepth might be unconfirmed. Current tx backlog might have screwed this up, afaik the wallet-tool also displays amounts from transactions with 0 confirmations
10:41 < waxwing> yes, by default it does
10:43 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@96.red-79-151-27.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has quit []
10:46 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] ok, the 2nd YG is up and running. You shouldnt be alone one freenode any more
10:46 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
10:46 < OverlordQ> dont think there's an easy way to differentiate w/o doubling the calls to the blockchain backend
10:47 -!- Einherjer [~einherjer@69.64.40.177] has quit [K-Lined]
10:47 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato]  [MCThread    ] [DEBUG]  Failed to find an alternative message channel for: Lowetijex, marking as left from: ('6dvj6v5imhny3anf.onion', 6698)
10:48 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] guess thats not a bad thing (that guy just requested !orderbook on the CgAn irc)
10:49 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@54.red-79-151-27.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has joined #joinmarket
10:50 < waxwing> AlexCato, yes that's going to be spit out constantly
10:50 < waxwing> just count it as debug, i might leave the message in but make it look less worrying or something
10:50 < waxwing> thanks!
10:51 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] no prob, will leave it running for a few days
10:51 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] also i'm both connected via TOR hidden service on one message channel and the clearnet freenode on another channel. That combination seems to work fine
10:52 < waxwing> yes, great. it would be pretty crazy if it didn't work, but nice confirmation anyway :)
10:53 < waxwing> i guess soon i'll test a taker but unfortunately the way the code works it'll just overwhelmingly likely choose makers from cgan anyway. well, there's been some testing on miniircds locally anyway.
10:55 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #joinmarket
10:55 -!- mkarrer_ [~mkarrer@54.red-79-151-27.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has joined #joinmarket
10:56 -!- mkarrer_ [~mkarrer@54.red-79-151-27.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has quit [Client Quit]
10:56 < waxwing> to be clear "choose from cgan" here refers to choosing cgan for private messaging, even if the bot is on both.
10:59 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@54.red-79-151-27.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
11:00 < waxwing> actually, scratch that, it's not true. If you manually choose makers on both with -P, then they should be about equally likely to choose one or the other for private messaging (they just choose based on where they last saw a message).
11:27 < OverlordQ> Well at least the spammer is consistent
11:27 < OverlordQ> makes it easier to block
13:00 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@41-135-115-151.dsl.mweb.co.za] has joined #joinmarket
13:00 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@41-135-115-151.dsl.mweb.co.za] has quit [Changing host]
13:00 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has joined #joinmarket
13:26 < waxwing> the tailsjoin script having been updated (in 2 places) to fix the libnacl directory path bug, no longer completes because the gpg sig doesn't verify against the script.
13:27 < waxwing> it's a little annoying as it's a forked repo so can't open an issue, but maybe someone can PR it.
13:31 -!- HostFat [~HostFat@2-235-224-2.ip230.fastwebnet.it] has joined #joinmarket
13:37 < waxwing> belcher_: did you see what i said earlier about last_used_addr? i'm pretty sure of it now. i have a test set up and working, i'll probably make a PR tomorrow for discussion (I think), albeit this is devilishly tricky stuff.
13:48 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #joinmarket
14:08 -!- jm_user [jclofk@bitcoinshell.mooo.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
14:08 -!- jm_user [jclofk@bitcoinshell.mooo.com] has joined #joinmarket
14:21 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
14:59 -!- lnostdal [~lnostdal@99-102-11.connect.netcom.no] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
17:09 -!- molz [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #joinmarket
17:10 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
17:20 -!- molz [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
17:20 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #joinmarket
17:29 -!- Qyyy382 [63f8fbaf@gateway/web/freenode/ip.99.248.251.175] has joined #joinmarket
17:29 < Qyyy382> Anyone willing to help a noob quickly?
17:29 < Qyyy382> Trying to use sendpayment.py and keep running into code 500, did you sign your transaction.
17:30 < Qyyy382> Tried to find it in the github guides, but couldn't
17:36 < belcher> Qyyy382 are you using blockr or bitcoin core ?
17:36 < belcher> as a blockchain interface
17:36 < Qyyy382> I haven't connected bitcoin core to it yet
17:38 < Qyyy382> Is that a requirement before I can proceed?
17:38 < Qyyy382> I have had successful payments spat out before
17:39 < belcher> hmm
17:39 < belcher> no idea
17:52 < Qyyy382> k got it
17:52 < Qyyy382> n/m. thnx
17:53 -!- Qyyy382 [63f8fbaf@gateway/web/freenode/ip.99.248.251.175] has quit [Quit: Page closed]
18:18 -!- fqtw_ [~me@x5d8048cd.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket
18:21 -!- fqtw [~me@x5d80780c.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
18:34 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
20:17 -!- HostFat [~HostFat@2-235-224-2.ip230.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
20:47 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-122-14-46-190.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
22:14 -!- dingus [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
22:27 -!- dingus [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket
22:31 -!- coins123 [~coins123@unaffiliated/coins123] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
22:31 -!- coins123 [~coins123@unaffiliated/coins123] has joined #joinmarket
22:46 -!- JacobApplbaum [Elite16197@gateway/shell/elitebnc/x-ihsnzegrvtlumerj] has joined #joinmarket
23:38 -!- molz [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #joinmarket
23:40 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
23:44 < waxwing> wonder what software dooglus used to make this picture: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.msg15212016#msg15212016
23:48 < JacobApplbaum> is it true 3 people were in this transaction?
23:48 < JacobApplbaum> could it be that it was 2 people
23:48 < JacobApplbaum> one from 2 adddress
23:48 < JacobApplbaum> the other from 1 address
23:50 < waxwing> sure. it could be one person also :)
23:51 < gmaxwell> JacobApplbaum: hi
23:52 < gmaxwell> Under very broad assumptions it could be up to six people involved in that transaction.
23:52 < gmaxwell> actually, up to 17 under the broadest assumptions.
23:53 < gmaxwell> The "broader assumptions" are that the participants are paying each other, not just walking away with the same amount they went in with.
23:53 < JacobApplbaum> 17
23:53 < JacobApplbaum> ?
23:53 < JacobApplbaum> or 18?
23:54 < JacobApplbaum> hi gmaxwell
23:54 < gmaxwell> I count 17 inputs + outputs, if there are actually 18 I miscounted.
23:54 < gmaxwell> though that "broader assumption" isn't currently very realistic, since I'm not aware of any software that will facilitate such a transaction today... it might be the case in the future.
23:58 < JacobApplbaum> whoever was running a yield on that probobly made a few k in that transaction!
23:59 < JacobApplbaum> or around 500$
23:59 < JacobApplbaum> if 1%