--- Day changed Sun Aug 21 2016 00:14 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 00:14 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #joinmarket 00:24 -!- shotwild [~shotwild@2a04:1980:3100:1aab:e61d:2dff:fe29:fc01] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 00:28 -!- shotwild [~shotwild@2a04:1980:3100:1aab:e61d:2dff:fe29:fc01] has joined #joinmarket 00:30 -!- coins123 [~coins123@unaffiliated/coins123] has joined #joinmarket 01:38 -!- fqtw_ [~me@x590dfcfc.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket 01:38 -!- fqtw [~me@x590dfcfc.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 01:40 -!- fqtw__ [~me@x590dfcfc.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket 01:43 -!- fqtw_ [~me@x590dfcfc.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 01:51 -!- arubi_ [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has joined #joinmarket 01:53 -!- arubi [~ese168@unaffiliated/arubi] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 02:20 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@159.red-83-47-122.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 02:21 -!- mkarrer [~mkarrer@159.red-83-47-122.dynamicip.rima-tde.net] has joined #joinmarket 02:33 -!- coins123 [~coins123@unaffiliated/coins123] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 03:22 -!- Giszmo1 [~leo@ppp-188-174-71-72.dynamic.mnet-online.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 03:33 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 03:50 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 03:50 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #joinmarket 03:51 -!- pweh [~OurChanne@unaffiliated/ourchannelbot] has joined #joinmarket 03:51 -!- pweh [~OurChanne@unaffiliated/ourchannelbot] has left #joinmarket ["Leaving"] 03:56 -!- coins123 [~coins123@unaffiliated/coins123] has joined #joinmarket 05:32 -!- fqtw_ [~me@x4db05d7a.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket 05:35 -!- fqtw__ [~me@x590dfcfc.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:43 < waxwing> pigeons: did you try to register the pit2-test channel on OFTC? i think you'd have to leave if i wanted to? 08:49 < pigeons> ok left 08:49 < waxwing> tks pigeons 08:49 < waxwing> pigeons: btw did you find a hidden service address? 08:49 < waxwing> it's mentioned on the page but google didn't tell me 08:50 < pigeons> no 09:02 < waxwing> pigeons: did you manage to connect over Tor? i'm wondering about ports 09:09 < waxwing> k, got it by running via TBB, i wonder what the right way to start Tor is without using that. 09:22 < pigeons> I must mis-understand. The only difference I know of connection to tor with the TBB vs the tor daemon is TBB uses TCP 9051 as default port while regular daemon defaults to 9050 09:23 < waxwing> is that it? i'm finding 9150 works with TBB and 9050 *should* work but doesn't with just 'tor' 09:23 < waxwing> or was it 9050 with TBB 09:24 < waxwing> i could have screwed up my config at some point, so there's that 09:24 < pigeons> oh maybe 9150 instead of 9051 i dont remember 09:24 < pigeons> but yeah thats the only difference 09:25 < pigeons> i mean its likely a slightly different version, the one included with TBB vs whatever else you installed or your distros, but its just an included tor daemon 09:25 < waxwing> sure; most likely explanation is i botched up the config file when i was messing around with HS 09:31 -!- fqtw__ [~me@x590ca848.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket 09:34 -!- fqtw_ [~me@x4db05d7a.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 09:36 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket 09:45 < waxwing> hmm, that's why i'm finding it hard to diagnose; seems oftc is flaky or doesn't like Tor, same settings that fail there work on CgAn 09:53 < waxwing> huh, that's interesting, volatile limits nicks to 9 chars :) 09:57 < opal> _o< heh hi >o_ 10:16 < grubles> hey i just wanted to say that joinmarket-qt is awesome :) 10:17 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #joinmarket 10:19 < belcher> back from vacation 10:22 < waxwing> belcher: :) 10:22 < waxwing> having an interesting convo with opal on Volatile rn 10:22 < waxwing> they actually implement RFC 9 char limit for nicks :) 10:22 < belcher> volatile ? 10:23 < opal> _o< irc.volatile.ch >o_ 10:23 < waxwing> http://volatile.ch/policy.htm#servers 10:23 < belcher> ah, an irc network 10:23 < opal> _o< welcome back from vacation :p >o_ 10:24 < waxwing> in other news, confirmed that oftc has disabled Tor recently :( 10:24 < opal> _o< yep >o_ 10:27 -!- Giszmo [~leo@250.red-213-97-251.staticip.rima-tde.net] has joined #joinmarket 10:32 -!- arubi_ is now known as arubi 10:36 < waxwing> any other candidates left for Tor support? i'm prepared to do the legwork if you have any names 10:36 < waxwing> or is it time for i2p? :) 10:36 * waxwing has never tried to use it, heard it's slow tho' 10:36 < opal> _o< it's as slow as you make it >o_ 10:36 < opal> _o< works fast for me >o_ 10:36 < opal> _o< i know a few tor-only networks >o_ 10:37 < opal> _o< one is just a place for a few vegan paedophile weirdos who are into free software >o_ 10:37 < opal> _o< well not "just" >o_ 10:37 < waxwing> good point, i never thought about Tor-*only*, not sure if that's a problem. 10:37 < opal> _o< but you do run that concern to anyone >o_ 10:37 < opal> _o< uh wtf >o_ 10:37 < opal> _o< one sec >o_ 10:37 < opal> _o< LOL >o_ 10:37 < opal> _o< someone's botting me on one network >o_ 10:37 < opal> _o< umode +R it is >o_ 10:38 < belcher> waxwing there are a couple of tor-only networks found on the hidden wiki 10:38 < waxwing> yeah but can we use them or is it going to cause problems with the users who *don't* use Tor 10:38 < belcher> i think clearnet and tor is the only way otherwise the bots get split up, not sure though 10:38 < waxwing> right 10:38 < opal> _o< as i was saying >o_ 10:39 < opal> _o< but you do run that concern to anyone who decides t oanalyse which network theyre using >o_ 10:39 < opal> _o< kinda bad rep to see joinmarket using a server with a #boys chan >o_ 10:39 < opal> _o< lol >o_ 10:39 < belcher> possibly 10:39 < opal> _o< on one hand that speaks wonders for its free speech >o_ 10:39 < opal> _o< but you have people who are deathly against that shit >o_ 10:39 < belcher> well right now CGAN is a hangout for left wing revolutionary anarcho-communists 10:39 < opal> _o< haha >o_ 10:40 < opal> _o< anarplex is another such place >o_ 10:40 < opal> _o< and indymedia but i believe they restrict tor access >o_ 10:42 < belcher> if someone wants to smear joinmarket and bitcoin by association, they have plenty of material with drug marketplaces, ransomware, pedophiles, weapons, tax evasion, counter-revolutionary activity, etc 10:43 < opal> _o< hehe >o_ 10:43 < belcher> we'll always lose the PR battle if we look at it like that, the best thing to do is point out the many legitimate uses, how privacy is a human right according to the UN, etc 10:43 < belcher> the place i went on vacation to has a new bitcoin ATM :) 10:44 < belcher> i was reading on some foreign language forums someone earned an amazon voucher, wanted to sell it for BTC and was asking what the markup was on this ATM 10:45 < waxwing> cool 10:52 < waxwing> well, except for the spectacular cut in value if they actually do that :) 10:53 < opal> _o< 17 53 08 <@opal> _o< waxwing you know what server-local channels are? >o_ >o_ 10:54 < opal> _o< 17 53 10 <@opal> _o< such as &channel >o_ >o_ 10:54 < opal> _o< 17 53 19 <@opal> _o< they dont get sent across the network, they just stay on one server >o_ >o_ 10:54 < opal> _o< belcher >o_ 10:54 < opal> _o< waxwing told me to ask in here haha >o_ 10:54 < waxwing> is there an advantage? 10:54 < opal> _o< i was thinking of configuring one of the servers on my network for bots >o_ 10:54 < opal> _o< to avoid flood limits caused by pm bursts >o_ 10:55 < opal> _o< the advantage is just less noise across the network >o_ 10:55 < belcher> waxwing im not sure amazon even delivers to that country 10:55 < waxwing> yes i see 10:55 < opal> _o< if i knew how flood limits worked better then i could end up saying "fuck it" and giving the roundrobin to connect to >o_ 10:56 < opal> _o< but i think e.g. i have flood limit set to 20 then it will only let twenty clients pm another client before messages get dropped >o_ 10:56 < opal> _o< one sec i'll test on myself >o_ 10:58 < opal> _o< ya only ten pms went through when i set floodcount to 10 >o_ 10:58 < opal> _o< and i was sending from like a hundred targets i think >o_ 10:58 < opal> _o< that's no issue if i decide to up the floodcount to something high (or set it unlimited) but i cant assure thats the same on servers that arent mine >o_ 11:03 < opal> _o< eh i think its safe to say that currently the other two opers on my net have floodcount set high >o_ 11:05 < opal> _o< is host cloaking a concern? >o_ 11:06 < waxwing> i think it's good, but i suppose those privacy-focused are using Tor. 11:06 < belcher> it would be better if the ip address wasnt visible to everyone 11:06 < belcher> freenode shows your ip to everyone :\ 11:07 < opal> _o< ya i have a stance against host cloaking, but my test server does support it >o_ 11:07 < opal> _o< i could switch it on for connecting users on that server >o_ 11:07 < belcher> what motivates your stance? 11:07 < belcher> since couldnt you get the same string used for banning by host if you hash the ip and use that instead 11:08 < opal> _o< i set -x everywhere i go, so for me personallyy it doesnt make sense >o_ 11:08 < opal> _o< and like waxwing said, tor is a thing >o_ 11:08 < opal> _o< vpns are a thing, vpses, bouncers, etc >o_ 11:08 < opal> _o< quite a lot of people who connect to irc dont really care one way or the other >o_ 11:09 < opal> _o< with joinmarket that may be skewed a bit more >o_ 11:09 < opal> _o< people will prefer privacy >o_ 11:09 < belcher> yes 11:09 < opal> _o< so i get that >o_ 11:09 < belcher> a significant number of joinmarket users dont even know they're using irc 11:09 < opal> _o< i know a chat network like that >o_ 11:09 < opal> _o< they have this awful frntend client >o_ 11:10 < opal> _o< i do funky stuff with irc and everyone asks what im doing >o_ 11:10 < opal> _o< since their client shows stuff funny >o_ 11:10 < opal> _o< i can also just flat out spoof users coming from that server >o_ 11:11 < opal> _o< so they all show as a static host >o_ 11:11 < belcher> yeah you look a bit funny here :p 11:11 < opal> _o< haha >o_ 11:11 < opal> _o< quack >o_ 11:11 < belcher> coloured writing surrounded by _o< >o_ 11:11 < opal> _o< ducks >o_ 11:11 < opal> _o< :3 >o_ 11:11 < waxwing> at least it doesn't look like hebrew this time :) 11:11 < belcher> hehe 11:14 < waxwing> belcher: JM was very busy last 2 weeks or so (quietened down now). curious, but there it is. 11:15 < belcher> obviously they waited for me to be afk to mix 11:15 < waxwing> :) 11:15 < belcher> interesting yes 11:15 < waxwing> i'd have to double check, but i think i had my busiest day personally in that period. but it was ~ 10 days maybe, not sure. 11:16 < belcher> i wonder if some economist wants to figure out what forces drive the bitcoin economy 11:30 < opal> _o< client_flood_max_lines = 2000; >o_ 11:30 < opal> _o< client_flood_burst_rate = 500; >o_ 11:30 < opal> _o< client_flood_burst_max = 100; >o_ 11:30 < opal> _o< client_flood_message_time = 1; >o_ 11:30 < opal> _o< client_flood_message_num = 50; >o_ 11:30 < opal> _o< heh >o_ 11:30 < opal> _o< i should suggest that to freenode >o_ 11:31 < waxwing> whatever freenode has now is fine for us, fwiw, with the throttling we impose on ourselves 11:31 < waxwing> and cgan too of course 11:32 < waxwing> although i don't know what happens if we go from 50-70 bots up to 100+ 11:35 < opal> _o< fakelag needs to die >o_ 11:35 < opal> _o< also i thought i disabled ident check on the other server >o_ 11:35 < opal> _o< lol >o_ 11:51 < opal> _o< install.gentoo.today +6697 has spoofing enabled now >o_ 11:51 < opal> _o< and either of the onions work as well >o_ 11:51 < opal> _o< same ports >o_ 11:51 < waxwing> spoofing? 11:52 < opal> _o< ya "~whatever@bot-gateway.invalid" >o_ 11:52 < waxwing> oh right thanks 11:52 < opal> _o< yep >o_ 11:52 < opal> _o< someone else runs a dedicated i2p server >o_ 11:52 < opal> _o< i can get the b32 >o_ 11:53 < opal> _o< well its on the website >o_ 12:03 -!- unwantedEquity is now known as ajvpot 12:07 < waxwing> running another tumble, hopefully get another test of the waiting-for-confirms bit. not able to do reasonable counterparty size though. but still. 12:24 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has joined #joinmarket 13:12 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 13:13 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #joinmarket 13:53 -!- malte_ [~malte@alkaid.uberspace.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 13:54 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 13:54 -!- malte [TbmIQUUDFq@alkaid.uberspace.de] has joined #joinmarket 13:55 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 13:58 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket 13:59 -!- grubles_ [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket 14:03 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 14:04 -!- grubles_ is now known as grubles 14:06 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #joinmarket 14:07 -!- coins123 [~coins123@unaffiliated/coins123] has quit [] 14:07 -!- coins123 [~coins123@unaffiliated/coins123] has joined #joinmarket 14:09 -!- malte [TbmIQUUDFq@alkaid.uberspace.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 14:17 -!- malte [sKguQMyoF9@alkaid.uberspace.de] has joined #joinmarket 14:19 -!- fqtw_ [~me@x590cbb29.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket 14:22 -!- fqtw__ [~me@x590ca848.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 14:40 -!- coins123 [~coins123@unaffiliated/coins123] has quit [] 15:33 -!- HeySteve [~Lizard__W@unaffiliated/heysteve] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 16:05 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] btw, as waxwing mentioned: last few days were pretty much JM activity. The 1% yearly yield mark isnt that impressive any more currently, as noted on reddit, belcher. Boosted my returns for a >50 btc JM wallet from about 1.5% to 16:05 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] best block is 000000000000000002f6759591d00e6a1bd4e1653f324bb5159cb31294dfadd8 continuously compounded equivalent annual interest rate = 3.87279659082 % 16:06 < JM-IRCRelay> [belcher] post that here? https://www.reddit.com/r/joinmarket/comments/4hwwa0/calculate_your_yield_generators_perannum_return/ 16:06 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] dont really want it to be google-able for all eternity, sorry :) 16:07 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] pretty interesting times. Hope usage for both yieldgens and tumblers increases in 0.2, it would be awesome to have a good alternative to the upcoming mycelium privacy enhancements 16:08 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] but feel free to post for me without actually mentioning my name, if you like 16:08 < JM-IRCRelay> [belcher] ok 16:08 < JM-IRCRelay> [belcher] AlexCato isnt your real name is it? 16:09 < JM-IRCRelay> [belcher] :p 16:09 < JM-IRCRelay> [AlexCato] course not :) But OpSec is hard, never know when it fails 16:42 -!- Giszmo [~leo@250.red-213-97-251.staticip.rima-tde.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 17:52 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 18:46 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 18:47 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket 19:05 -!- fqtw__ [~me@x590d121c.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket 19:09 -!- fqtw_ [~me@x590cbb29.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 20:05 -!- aharlan [~aharlan@dyn-160-39-63-154.dyn.columbia.edu] has joined #joinmarket 20:05 -!- aharlan [~aharlan@dyn-160-39-63-154.dyn.columbia.edu] has quit [Client Quit] 20:53 -!- fqtw_ [~me@x590d121c.dyn.telefonica.de] has joined #joinmarket 20:56 -!- fqtw__ [~me@x590d121c.dyn.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 21:10 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 23:55 -!- moli [~molly@unaffiliated/molly] has joined #joinmarket 23:58 -!- ratoder [~ratoder@static.111.19.201.138.clients.your-server.de] has joined #joinmarket