--- Day changed Sat Jan 05 2019
02:01 -!- undeath [~undeath@hashcat/team/undeath] has joined #joinmarket     
04:01 -!- asymptotically [~asymptoti@gateway/tor-sasl/asymptotically] has joined #joinmarket     
04:45 -!- ananteris [~user@gateway/tor-sasl/ananteris] has joined #joinmarket     
04:52 -!- ananteris [~user@gateway/tor-sasl/ananteris] has quit [Quit: ananteris]     
07:17 -!- raedah [~x@192.30.89.59] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]     
08:16 < waxwing> https://gist.github.com/AdamISZ/4551b947789d3216bacfcb7af25e029e#gistcomment-2800791
08:27 < waxwing> very interesting data. i've coded it in line with the previous comment i made there. the apparently large ambiguity suggests to me very much that this is a good/practical approach.
09:00 -!- grubles_ [~grubles_@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
09:11 -!- grubles_ [~grubles_@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket     
09:19 -!- grubles_ [~grubles_@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
09:19 -!- grubles_ [~grubles_@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket     
09:21 -!- grubles_ [~grubles_@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
09:22 -!- grubles_ [~grubles_@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket     
10:49 -!- grubles_ [~grubles_@unaffiliated/grubles] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
11:01 -!- grubles_ [~grubles_@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #joinmarket     
11:59 -!- achow101 [~achow101@unaffiliated/achow101] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]     
12:01 -!- achow101 [~achow101@unaffiliated/achow101] has joined #joinmarket     
12:06 -!- stoner19 [~stoner19@unaffiliated/stoner19] has quit [Excess Flood]     
12:06 -!- stoner19 [~stoner19@vmi221374.contaboserver.net] has joined #joinmarket     
12:06 -!- stoner19 [~stoner19@vmi221374.contaboserver.net] has quit [Changing host]     
12:06 -!- stoner19 [~stoner19@unaffiliated/stoner19] has joined #joinmarket     
14:01 -!- asymptotically [~asymptoti@gateway/tor-sasl/asymptotically] has quit [Quit: Leaving]     
14:31 -!- GitHub164 [GitHub164@gateway/service/github.com/x-ipxszyewiuhucgfb] has joined #joinmarket     
14:31 < GitHub164> [joinmarket-clientserver] AdamISZ opened pull request #279: Implement payjoin (p2ep) direct payment joins (master...p2ep) https://git.io/fh3Nd
14:31 -!- GitHub164 [GitHub164@gateway/service/github.com/x-ipxszyewiuhucgfb] has left #joinmarket []     
14:34 < arubi> \o/     
14:34 < arubi> I also have something interesting..  writing the PR message now :)
14:44 -!- GitHub30 [GitHub30@gateway/service/github.com/x-xgzqzycmokzybjvo] has joined #joinmarket     
14:44 < GitHub30> [joinmarket-clientserver] fivepiece opened pull request #280: PoC - verify transactions with libbitcoinconsensus (master...poc-btcconsensus) https://git.io/fh3AC
14:44 -!- GitHub30 [GitHub30@gateway/service/github.com/x-xgzqzycmokzybjvo] has left #joinmarket []     
14:48 < waxwing> arubi, oh that's a cool idea yes .. it's funny how it's only the last couple of weeks it even occurred to me that we don't really verify inputs :)
14:48 < waxwing> well it was more like, we were never ambitious before and just assumed inputs were from our wallet.
14:49 < arubi> hehe yea, I got the idea from the comment in verify_tx_input that codeseparator isn't handled.  but yea for our own inputs, we do what we can
14:49 < waxwing> right. was gonna ask you about codeseparator and then realised it's irrelevant :)
14:50 < waxwing> you know about testmempoolaccept right? but i suppose that's not relevant since you're being more ambitious, interrogating individual scriptsigs/witnesses
14:51 < arubi> oh right there's that, but I don't think it works unless the parent tx is in mempool or utxo
14:51 < waxwing> yes, another good point
14:52 < arubi> what I think this libcon verify_script lacks is ability to verify in context of locktimes
14:53 < arubi> other than that seems to be complete
14:54 < arubi> what I mean by "in context", say the spend is for csv and the sequence is correct in the transaction, it'd return true but really the actual block height might still be in the future.  but yea that's very easy to check I think
14:56 < arubi> oh no what did I break, it was working fine lol
14:57 < arubi> oh actually it /is/ working.  I just forgot to remove the "return False" I set to test something :)
15:11 < arubi> lol waxwing looks like the linter got you
15:12 < waxwing> arubi, yeah i've put that off, wasn't expecting to actually pass yet, haven't even run locally
15:13 < arubi> ah cool :)
15:14 -!- undeath [~undeath@hashcat/team/undeath] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.3]     
17:47 -!- AgoraRelay [~jmrelayfn@p5486656E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]     
18:01 -!- AgoraRelay [~jmrelayfn@p5DE4AE9D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #joinmarket     
23:14 -!- nothingmuch [~user@62.102.148.164] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]