--- Day changed Tue Jan 09 2018 00:01 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] aviau opened pull request #575: Update Slack invite link (master...patch-1) https://git.io/vNto6 00:11 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 00:15 -!- Pioklo_ [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has joined #lnd 00:28 < anome> good morning 00:29 < anome> is neutrino anywhere near ready? 00:30 < anome> (can i use it in development without running into lots of confusion and frustration) 00:39 -!- Pioklo_ [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 00:49 -!- pioklo [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has joined #lnd 00:51 -!- JackH [~laptop@91.189.61.70] has joined #lnd 00:52 < anome> i'm getting "unknown flag 'macaroonpath'" when trying to run lnd with --macaroonpath=dir/subdir 00:53 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 00:54 -!- pioklo [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 00:57 < Veggen> Didn't specify a macaroonpath. This means my macaroons end up in ~/.lnd/ 01:01 < Veggen> think the flags are adminmacaroonpath and readonlymacaroonpath and specifies a file. 01:01 < Veggen> --adminmacaroonpath= Path to write the admin macaroon for lnd's RPC and REST services if it doesn't exist (/home/vegard/.lnd/admin.macaroon) 01:02 < Veggen> --readonlymacaroonpath= Path to write the read-only macaroon for lnd's RPC and REST services if it doesn't exist (/home/vegard/.lnd/readonly.macaroon) 01:07 -!- pioklo [~Pioklo@host-185-73-88-133.oxylion.net.pl] has joined #lnd 01:07 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] halseth opened pull request #576: [trivial] pilot: add goroutine to waitgroup (master...goroutine-wg-add) https://git.io/vNtPV 01:18 -!- seaelem [~seaelem@1.136.109.216] has joined #lnd 01:19 -!- ajunas [adefe89e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.173.239.232.158] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 01:19 -!- naribia [adefe89e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.173.239.232.158] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 01:22 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 01:27 < sdfgsdf> wow finally the invite link is back 01:27 < sdfgsdf> happily ever after 02:13 -!- crimnak [c2412547@gateway/web/freenode/ip.194.65.37.71] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 02:16 -!- wxss [~user@109.236.91.108] has joined #lnd 02:29 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@153.142.228.110] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 02:35 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [] 02:44 -!- sovjet [~sovjet@gw.plastoform.si] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 02:47 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 02:53 -!- ninjahamstah [~ninjahams@2001:bc8:4400:2800::4b29] has quit [Changing host] 02:53 -!- ninjahamstah [~ninjahams@unaffiliated/ninjamastah] has joined #lnd 02:57 -!- nirved [~nirved@2a02:8071:b58a:3c00:216f:11e8:4e41:8ba1] has joined #lnd 03:04 -!- bp__ [89e20e0a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.137.226.14.10] has joined #lnd 03:06 -!- JackH [~laptop@91.189.61.70] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 03:09 -!- bp__ [89e20e0a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.137.226.14.10] has quit [Client Quit] 03:12 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 03:22 -!- MaxSan [~user@185.156.175.51] has joined #lnd 03:43 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 03:48 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 03:56 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #lnd 04:03 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] halseth opened pull request #577: Add integration test case name to node output (master...test-log-testcase-start) https://git.io/vNtAv 04:11 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 04:12 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 04:14 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [Client Quit] 04:15 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 04:18 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [Client Quit] 04:25 -!- seaelem [~seaelem@1.136.109.216] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 04:28 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 04:28 -!- booyah [~bb@193.25.1.157] has quit [Killed (Sigyn (Spam is off topic on freenode.))] 04:33 -!- booyah [~bb@193.25.1.157] has joined #lnd 04:36 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 04:37 -!- JackH [~laptop@91.189.61.70] has joined #lnd 04:46 -!- sdfgsdf [~sdfgsdfg@unaffiliated/sdfgsdfg] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 04:48 -!- pioklo [~Pioklo@host-185-73-88-133.oxylion.net.pl] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 04:49 -!- kexkey [~kexkey@173.209.63.133] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 04:51 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 04:56 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 05:06 -!- JackH [~laptop@91.189.61.70] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 05:10 -!- pioklo [Pioklo@ip-91.246.70.194.skyware.pl] has joined #lnd 05:12 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 05:13 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #lnd 05:21 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 05:45 -!- PaulCape_ [~PaulCapes@ip68-100-207-91.dc.dc.cox.net] has quit [Quit: .] 05:45 -!- kexkey [~kexkey@68.168.114.35] has joined #lnd 05:50 < Veggen> Could we change the penalty for cheating so that no matter how long it has gone, if a cheat is proven, he'll lose the funds in *all* his channels? 05:53 < Veggen> hmm. Would probably not be possible, but it'd be nice ;P 05:54 < Veggen> I just see too much FUD about the counterparty risk. Which is there, and it's non-zero, so it's not something that FUDsters will ever give up on ;P 05:57 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip68-100-207-91.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #lnd 06:11 < cjd[m]1> Sounds like a brilliant way to attack someone, by somehow tricking or hacking or otherwise fooling them into cheating or tricking others into thinking they cheated in order to rob them 06:11 < anome> hello again, i had a question earlier 06:11 < anome> i'm getting "unknown flag 'macaroonpath'" when trying to run lnd with --macaroonpath=dir/subdir 06:11 < cjd[m]1> generally security systems should never implement "retaliation" because that becomes just one more vulnerability 06:13 < Veggen> anome: read "lnd --help" ? 06:14 < Veggen> it's adminmacaroonpath ad reeadonlymacaroonpath 06:14 < Veggen> both of them should point to files, not to a directory. 06:14 < anome> Veggen hey, thanks 06:16 < anome> must have read an outdated tut 06:16 < Veggen> cjd: sure. But how can one counter the counter-party FUD ? :) 06:17 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-uqpwbwklayjqxwgb] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 06:17 < Veggen> risk is non-zero, potential loss can in certain situations actually be worth it, at least in theory... 06:19 -!- Erik____ [b00a89b3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.176.10.137.179] has joined #lnd 06:21 < cjd[m]1> If the code works correctly, there's no way to cheat without losing what you put in, and if there's no way to cheat without losing what you put in, there's no incentive to cheat 06:26 -!- leo18 [b35f11fd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.179.95.17.253] has joined #lnd 06:30 -!- boldface [5501bedc@gateway/web/freenode/ip.85.1.190.220] has joined #lnd 06:31 < boldface> I'm implementing a LN based webshop similar to starblocks. What's the best way to get realtime payment notifications? 06:31 < boldface> currently I use lncli listinvoices and check if settled = true 06:40 < boldface> I also see an entry in the lnd.log obviously for Payment received 06:42 < ysangkok> boldface: did you see http://api.lightning.community/#subscribeinvoices 06:42 < ysangkok> the "streaming" property makes it possible to avoid polling 06:42 < ysangkok> which i assume you are doing now? 06:45 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 06:45 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 06:46 -!- sh_smith [~sh_smith@cpe-76-174-26-91.socal.res.rr.com] has joined #lnd 06:46 < Veggen> cjd: The FUD is that you will need to be always on. Answer is watcher nodes. 06:47 < Veggen> cjd: And here comes the real GEM - since there will not be any cheating because there will always be watcher nodes to catch them, noone will know whether or not the watcher nodes are doing their job, they could suddenly stop doint it because there is no incentive for them. 06:47 < Veggen> Now that I am repeating it, I admit it sounds a bit silly. 06:52 < boldface> ysangkok: thanks .. that's what I was looking for 06:55 -github-neutrino:#lnd- [neutrino] simonhorlick opened pull request #40: Performance Improvements (master...block-caching) https://git.io/vNqY7 06:59 -!- boldface [5501bedc@gateway/web/freenode/ip.85.1.190.220] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 07:03 < Veggen> can you decode a reason from UpdateFailHTLC? I have duly forwarded reuests to endurance several times today, but they fail ;P 07:15 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 07:22 -!- Erik____ [b00a89b3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.176.10.137.179] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 07:28 -!- sderf [c0a4d32c@gateway/web/freenode/ip.192.164.211.44] has joined #lnd 07:31 -!- sderf [c0a4d32c@gateway/web/freenode/ip.192.164.211.44] has quit [Client Quit] 07:39 -!- whphhg [~whphhg@unaffiliated/whphhg] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 07:40 -!- whphhg [~whphhg@unaffiliated/whphhg] has joined #lnd 07:51 <@molz> Veggen, endurance node is down 08:04 < Veggen> hmm. But why is the channel up? 08:04 < Veggen> or, did it go down earlier today? 08:05 < Veggen> (some hours since these transactions) 08:08 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 08:09 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #lnd 08:18 -!- bolt_on [5ecc94c5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.204.148.197] has joined #lnd 08:41 -!- leo18 [b35f11fd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.179.95.17.253] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:55 <@molz> hm i think endurance node is up now 09:02 -!- mapo [d460b2a2@gateway/web/freenode/ip.212.96.178.162] has joined #lnd 09:17 -!- eck [~eck@fsf/member/eck] has joined #lnd 09:17 -!- mapo [d460b2a2@gateway/web/freenode/ip.212.96.178.162] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 09:20 -!- poordad [473c1735@gateway/web/freenode/ip.71.60.23.53] has joined #lnd 09:25 -!- kuisma_ [5b9d3e58@gateway/web/freenode/ip.91.157.62.88] has joined #lnd 09:27 -!- kuisma_ [5b9d3e58@gateway/web/freenode/ip.91.157.62.88] has quit [Client Quit] 09:42 -!- pera [~pera@unaffiliated/pera] has joined #lnd 10:02 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 10:12 -!- galileopy [~galileopy@181.120.143.157] has joined #lnd 10:34 <@roasbeef> was getting some routing errors to it the other night 10:35 <@roasbeef> they shoudl reallyjust open up starblocks so people can supply direct liquidity 10:36 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 10:37 -!- ytohua [0c5e184e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.12.94.24.78] has joined #lnd 10:38 < ytohua> Not sure if this correct place to ask about the LN, not the software lnd 10:38 < ytohua> 1. Possible to withdraw just part of my LN balance, or do I need to withdraw all of it at once? 10:38 < ytohua> 2. What about reloading, I can reload little bit at a time right? 10:39 < ytohua> 3. Lets say my LN node has balance of 500 satoshis, if 500 satoshies were routed through are those 500 sats spent, or does it remain at 500 sats? 10:39 < ytohua> 4. The amount of balance on my node determines the maximum that can be routed through it right? 10:39 < ytohua> Thanks 10:45 -!- bolt_on [5ecc94c5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.204.148.197] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 10:47 < lndbot1> 1. This is possible, roasbeef as referred to it as splicing out, but it isn’t implemented yet 10:48 < lndbot1> 2. Same goes for reloading, or splicing in, but needs to be built 10:51 < lndbot1> 3. Each side of a edge is owned by a particular node, and nodes bundle together all of their sides to form a vertex 10:51 < lndbot1> Your balance is represented as the sum of all money around that vertex 10:52 < lndbot1> When routing payments, you are just shifting balances between the outgoing edges from your node. So you don’t lose money, it’s just being shuffled between an incoming and outgoing channel, with a small amount being accumulated as fees 10:53 < lndbot1> Individual channel balances may change as a result of routing, but the sum of money controlled by you will remain unchanged ignoring fees 10:54 < ytohua> Thank you for your reply. So lets say I am running an LN node, and want to cash out any potential fees I might have earned, right now until splicing is added 10:54 < ytohua> I have to close out, then re-open connection with LN network? 10:54 < lndbot1> 4. The balance on your side of the channel determines how much money can flow out of it. Similarly, the balance on the other party’s side determines how much they could try to route through you, assuming you also have an outgoing edge that can match the capacity 10:54 < ytohua> Would doing this affect my integration with the network ? 10:55 < ytohua> Would doing this affect my integration with the network ? 10:56 < lndbot1> That’s correct, until splicing is implemented that channel would become unusable as it’s in the process of being closed. What do you mean by integration? 10:57 < ytohua> I guess, upon closing out and re-opening, would my LN have different address? Would my position in the network change ? 10:59 -!- SevenTimes_ [SevenTimes@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/seventimes] has joined #lnd 11:00 -!- madness [4fb60179@gateway/web/freenode/ip.79.182.1.121] has joined #lnd 11:00 -!- StopAndDecrypt [~StopAndDe@unaffiliated/stopanddecrypt] has joined #lnd 11:00 < madness> Hello :) 11:00 < madness> Anyone here? 11:02 < lndbot1> your node’s pubkey would remain unchanged unless you make a new wallet. any other channels you have open would be unaffected, and you could theoretically reopen a channel with the same party assuming they are still online 11:02 -!- galileopy [~galileopy@181.120.143.157] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 11:03 < ytohua> Is centralization of the network a concern with LN? What factors would determine which nodes have a central position in the network, capacity of funds? Something else? 11:04 < lndbot1> madness, hello :slightly_smiling_face: 11:04 < madness> Even if it gets somewhat centralized, the competetion is very easy 11:05 < madness> @ytohua 11:05 < lndbot1> it’s only a concern for reliability, but because LN is non-custodial there isn’t any real risk to your funds 11:06 < lndbot1> The only thing that would determine that is if a bunch of people decide to open channels with that node 11:06 < madness> anyway, i'm considering to start contributing full time job for the proj :) 11:07 < madness> for now i think this should not concern you - i've just firstly cloned the git 11:07 < madness> but i'm currently in a year off, not working 11:07 < madness> and this seems like a proj i'd love to join 11:08 < ytohua> you code madness ? 11:08 < madness> yes 11:08 < madness> also have a background in cryptography 11:09 < madness> vulnerability research 11:09 < madness> etc 11:09 < lndbot1> madness, we’d love to have you on board! there’s a million things on the todo list, would really appreciate any contributions you can offer 11:09 < ytohua> madness: you have my respect already 11:09 < madness> that's nice to here 11:10 < madness> it will take me some time to start debugging the code. i want to briefly read important parts to understand the architecture etc 11:11 < madness> but the fact you are welcoming is encouraging 11:12 < ytohua> does LN support multisig and other transactions that would normally work in P2SH on bitcoin, or just regular transactions for now? 11:12 < ytohua> and I admit I am a noob, but I am learning and reading/researchign as much as I can 11:13 < ytohua> about Ln, my knowledge in bitcoin is very in depth, but new to LN 11:13 < madness> actually I do have a question about first layer 11:14 < madness> quite a basic one 11:14 < madness> about 51% attack 11:14 < madness> which is actually possible and profitable with 25% of the network computing power 11:15 < ytohua> From my understanding, nodes enforce the rules, if miner tries to pass invalid block it would be rejected 11:16 < ytohua> but miner with majority power could artifically keep blocks low or empty, or censor transactions 11:16 < madness> so the question is: why not rejecting blockchains that are different from the blockchain you (a node) own by 6 or more blocks 11:17 < madness> and by that algedly eliminating the possiblity of reverting confirmed transaction 11:18 < madness> i.e.: A node is holding the its blockchain. Now it sees another different blockchain. very different blockchain, that has more than 6 different blocks on it 11:18 < madness> this is deffinitely a majority attack on the network 11:19 < ytohua> to create a fork with alot of confirmations would take alot of computational power 11:19 < madness> I'd assume the nodes reject this chain 11:19 < ytohua> how possible is a forking attack everyone? 11:19 < ytohua> possible with majority hashing power? 11:20 -!- eck [~eck@fsf/member/eck] has quit [Quit: we out here] 11:21 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 11:21 -!- pera [~pera@unaffiliated/pera] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 11:23 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #lnd 11:24 < madness> ytohua, i didn't follow 11:24 < madness> maybe i wan't clear 11:24 < madness> a few points 11:25 < madness> firstly: a majority attack is possible and profitable just with 25% of the computation power 11:25 < madness> take my work here 11:26 < madness> secondly: i'm proposing alledgedly a better way to mitigate against a majority attack 11:26 < madness> take my word** here 11:27 < madness> this is what currently happening: nodes gets new blocks mined by the miners all the time. the nodes concat this block to the chain they are holding. now 11:27 < madness> sometimes a node need to hold two chains, and waits to see which chain will eventually win 11:28 < madness> do you agree with my description by far? 11:28 < madness> if you agree by now i will describe my proposal 11:31 -!- pera [~pera@unaffiliated/pera] has joined #lnd 11:31 < haakonn> updated lnd to HEAD. trying to pay a yalls invoice. keep getting UnknownNextPeer. i have 3 peers. anything i can do? 11:32 -!- JackH [~laptop@amb191.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #lnd 11:32 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 11:32 < ytohua> Yeah I agree madness 11:32 < madness> Good 11:33 < ytohua> Im interesting in hearing, also maybe submit to bitcoin-dev if have ideas of improvement? 11:33 < ytohua> I mean the mailing list 11:33 -!- belcher_ [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #lnd 11:33 < haakonn> trying to pay a starblocks invoice, i get 'unable to find a path to destination' 11:33 < madness> anyway, now what happen when someone is doing a majority attack? the attacker 11:34 < madness> tryies to revert his/her own transaction 11:34 < madness> so he/she can double spend it 11:34 * ytohua stepping outside for little bit will read when back 11:34 < madness> if the receiver waited 6 confirmations before accepting the payment, 11:34 < madness> the attacker now need to change a block which is 6 blocks behind the head block 11:35 < madness> do you agree? 11:35 < madness> OH I WILL BE DAMNED WITH MY SPELLING MISTAKES 11:40 -!- pera [~pera@unaffiliated/pera] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 11:41 <@roasbeef> madness: yeh that's how reorgs work 11:42 < ytohua> back 11:42 <@roasbeef> haakonn: starblocks has been unreachable lately, the setup they have is kinda weird, the only allow a single whitelisted node to establish direct channels, so if that's unbalanced you can't open up a direct to pay or even find an alternative route 11:42 < madness> @roasbeef ok so my naive question is as follow: 11:43 < madness> if i see a chain which is so different from the chain i'm currently holding (different by 6 blocks back) 11:43 < madness> this new chain, is definitely a majority attack on the network 11:43 < haakonn> roasbeef: good to know. i'm also trying to pay yalls, and i get "unable to find a path to destination" 11:43 < madness> there is no legit senario in which such chain could have been made 11:44 < madness> so I'd expect all node to reject it 11:44 < madness> what am i missing 11:44 < madness> ? 11:45 < ytohua> madness: so your pondering that therre should be a maximum amount of block difference between two competing chains? 11:45 -!- pera [~pera@unaffiliated/pera] has joined #lnd 11:45 < ytohua> good question, 11:46 < ytohua> could ask on bitcoin chan but I am banned from there because I am not registered user 11:46 < ytohua> and I hate having to create new registration every time I use freenode if never goign to use it again 11:46 <@roasbeef> madness: no it isn't, but this isn't directly related to lightning 11:46 <@roasbeef> there is no majority attack, only a valid chain with more work 11:47 <@roasbeef> "reject reorgs more than N blocks bag" is broken 11:47 <@roasbeef> alt coins have attempted it before 11:48 < ytohua> roasbeef: what is wrong with reorg reject after N blocks? 11:49 <@roasbeef> you many never come to consensus, the entire network splinters 11:49 -!- belcher_ [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 11:54 < ytohua> so china people if have fragmented network could be on different blockchain and not know it? 11:55 < ytohua> or if global war breaks out, the blockchain could fragment into multiple chains right? 11:55 < ytohua> how can this be corrected post-fragmentation? or prevented? 12:00 -!- belcher_ [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #lnd 12:02 < midnightmagic> ytohua: there is a satellite broadcast; there can easily be radio broadcasts; and unless they can shut down the Tor network entirely, there's also Tor. There's I2P. There's VPN and skinsuit or obfs2 or whatever it is right now. 12:03 < midnightmagic> ytohua: It would be unusual if there were an entire network isolated so perfectly that no blocks would transfer across boundaries. 12:03 < midnightmagic> Also it wouldn't make any sense to try to halt btc traffic. 12:05 < booyah> midnightmagic: there is also USB stick. unstopable 12:06 * booyah steno's blockchain into vacation photo 12:08 <@roasbeef> heh slack is down rn 12:08 <@roasbeef> LONG LIVE IRC 12:09 < midnightmagic> booyah: sneakernet. although a steady stream of them fast enough to orient on consensus would be difficult to continue to maintain. 12:09 < midnightmagic> :-) 12:12 < jrick> roasbeef: pfft irc is still centralized though 12:12 < jrick> it's just open 12:13 < midnightmagic> IRC is semi-federated. 12:14 < booyah> matrix 12:16 < madness> roasbeef: yes you are right. this is not the channel for such things. anyidea what's the best place? 12:17 < madness> i'm really excited about joining in.... i've looked on the todo list, and the huge amount of work that has been done by far 12:18 < midnightmagic> matrix makes me uneasy because of its current brokenness. :( 12:18 < madness> it's seems completly possible this will be finished within 10 month even 12:18 < madness> i'm so excited 12:19 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] Roasbeef pushed 1 new commit to master: https://git.io/vNqNz 12:19 -github-lnd:#lnd- lnd/master e5b7417 Olaoluwa Osuntokun: pilot: avoid cancelling the tx subscription twice, use proper wg value... 12:21 < haakonn> will routing improve the longer lnd stays running? still unable to pay yalls 12:23 < haakonn> i have opened the port and set my external ip for good measure 12:24 < haakonn> "HSWC: unable to find links by destination unable to locate channel link bydestination hop id 0338f57dd251f2edab6f51ab3b0b7368bf9e5483d97b4393a1d1424fbbeccb5a66" 12:30 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-arowxvfimkitqwyq] has joined #lnd 12:33 <@roasbeef> haakonn: that's just a peer disconnecting, what payment error are you getting? 12:35 < haakonn> roasbeef: sometimes it's "unable to route payment to destination: UnknownNextPeer", other times it's "unable to find a path to destination" (for the same lncli payinvoice command with the same invoice) 12:35 <@roasbeef> unable to find means you don't even know of the end point, unknownpeer is a node in your selected path wasn't online 12:36 < haakonn> so it's no fault of my own? i figured maybe i needed to connect to some peer or something 12:38 -!- jigawatt [2f2ae8cc@gateway/web/freenode/ip.47.42.232.204] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 12:46 < ytohua> wow my organization was not able to connect to slack 12:46 < ytohua> good to hear not just me 12:49 < ytohua> Is LN safe to use for real transactions or only safe to use on testnet coins? 12:50 < ytohua> if not yet ready for real money, is there an ETA? 12:50 < ytohua> or "when it is ready"? 12:50 -!- eck [~eck@fsf/member/eck] has joined #lnd 13:01 < madness> ytohua: ln is not yet ready, obviously 13:01 < madness> they don't know yet. they are working on it 13:02 < ytohua> does lnd require the golang bitcoin client or can it work with my bitcoin core full node? 13:04 <@molz> haakonn, which node are you having a channel with? 13:06 < ytohua> Using LN with clearnet can be very dangerous if I understand correctly. "I see the node at this ip address has 10 bitcoins on it" makes for a target 13:06 < ytohua> LN can be set to use i2p right? 13:08 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] halseth closed pull request #576: [trivial] pilot: add goroutine to waitgroup (master...goroutine-wg-add) https://git.io/vNtPV 13:09 <@molz> ytohua, how do you see their bitcoins? 13:10 < ytohua> isnt chan capacity need known for creating routes? 13:11 -!- ajunas [adefe8a5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.173.239.232.165] has joined #lnd 13:13 <@molz> no? 13:13 < ytohua> LND can be used with i2p or .onion right though? 13:22 < haakonn> molz: my channel is with bitrefill's node 13:24 < haakonn> one strange thing is that lncli listchannels shows two channels, and both of them have "active": false. it shows this even when i use --active_only 13:24 <@molz> haakonn, then those nodes are down 13:25 <@molz> not sure what --active_only does? 13:25 <@molz> haakonn, what is bitrefill's node key that you have? 13:25 < haakonn> "--active_only, -a only list channels which are currently active" 13:26 < haakonn> how do i check that? listpeers only show node keys and i don't know which one of them is bitrefill 13:26 <@molz> listchannels 13:26 < haakonn> ah. 0338f57dd251f2edab6f51ab3b0b7368bf9e5483d97b4393a1d1424fbbeccb5a66 13:27 <@molz> that's a dead node 13:27 <@molz> that's why you can't send pmts to them 13:27 < haakonn> oh. bitrefill shut down their node? 13:28 <@molz> justin had to update it 13:28 <@molz> haakonn, you can close out that node and connect to this one: 0298d0c6987e2e64451c7f723e15aff4dfca92f0e3973d214e206257abb0d1dd55@lnd.bitrefill.com:9735 13:29 < haakonn> molz: thanks. how do you find out these things? i've just been using your pastebin :P 13:30 -!- naribia [adefe8a5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.173.239.232.165] has joined #lnd 13:30 < naribia> whats the pastebin link again? 13:30 <@molz> haakonn, hahaa welcome to lnd testing :D 13:30 <@molz> haakonn, you can ask us here 13:31 < haakonn> since the channel is "active": false, does that mean bitrefill already closed the channel 13:31 < haakonn> ? 13:31 <@molz> it means the node is down or gone 13:31 < haakonn> ok, so i have to close the channel, right? lncli closechannel, with what argument? 13:31 <@molz> haakonn, i have a short list of fun nodes here: https://paste.ee/p/zI79V#UFEtcKkrmKrwkwuBTcJ5rIXBoZEpkEmT 13:31 < haakonn> ah, chan_id 13:31 <@molz> haakonn, use channel_point 13:32 < haakonn> i tried channel_point but it failed 13:32 <@molz> no channel_point, and the index next to it 13:32 <@molz> grab the index 13:32 <@molz> lncli closechannel 13:32 <@molz> and you have to use --force too in this case 13:33 < naribia> oh cool 13:33 < haakonn> ah, --force worked 13:33 < naribia> is there a way to add my node to the list? I plan to keep it online and develop it 13:34 <@molz> ok djseeds gave two scripts for this 13:34 <@molz> to close all channels at once: lncli listchannels | jq '.[][]' | jq -r '.channel_point' | tr : ' ' | xargs -n2 lncli closechannel 13:34 < haakonn> well obviously 13:34 <@molz> to close only inactive channels: lncli listchannels | jq '.[][]' | jq -c -r 'select(.active == false) | .channel_point' | tr : ' ' | xargs -n2 lncli closechannel --force 13:36 < haakonn> when i open a channel, what is push-amt? 13:36 < naribia> its like an immediate payment to the counterparty 13:36 < haakonn> that's what i thought, but i don't understand the point 13:37 < haakonn> well maybe i open the channel to make a payment immediately, that would make sense 13:40 < poordad> madness: your 51% attack idea, on the high level, is interesting. Though I think it may be only discussion worthy, in reality anyone considering an attack like this would have already considered the devaluing implications of proving the instability of the bitcoin miner network. Looks to me like a depressing paradox for a criminal, he finds a way to steal billions of digital dollars only to completely discredit the value of the dollars he 13:41 < madness> yeah sure 13:42 < madness> poordad: but when designing a system you don't want this to be the only reason not-to-attack-the-system 13:43 < madness> i really wonder what will happen when ln comes out 13:43 < poordad> completely agreed! because there still would be incentive for those who could profit from the demise of this project 13:44 < madness> poordad: are you contributing to the project? 13:45 < poordad> i've got the coding experience of a paperweight 13:45 < poordad> but im a quick learner, starting with trying to get the lightning testnet installed and buy some fake coffees 13:48 -!- sdfgsdf [~sdfgsdfg@unaffiliated/sdfgsdfg] has joined #lnd 13:48 < ytohua> not all attacking adversaries would really care about valuation 13:48 < ytohua> poordad: 13:49 < poordad> yeah true, roger ver sure wouldnt mind lol 13:57 < ytohua> The mining algo used by monero seems to be very resistant to GPU and ASIC. 13:58 < ytohua> well, gpu can mine but not much more power than CPU, wonder if any consideration to change bitcoin mining algo 13:59 < ytohua> sorry did not mean to get off topic of LND 14:03 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip68-100-207-91.dc.dc.cox.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 14:04 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip68-100-207-91.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #lnd 14:05 < haakonn> molz: with the new channel, payment to yalls worked! still no luck with starblocks, but i understand they have some issues. thanks for all the help 14:06 <@molz> haakonn, np, do you have a channel with endurance (eclair)? 14:06 < haakonn> no, just one channel open, with bitrefill 14:07 -!- ytohua [0c5e184e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.12.94.24.78] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 14:09 < haakonn> i wish peers had something human readable to identify them. listpeers doesn't tell me much 14:13 <@molz> hm my eclair phone app shows yalls and htlc are offline 14:13 <@molz> alexbosworth 14:15 <@molz> haakonn, open a channel with endurance: lncli connect 03933884aaf1d6b108397e5efe5c86bcf2d8ca8d2f700eda99db9214fc2712b134@endurance.acinq.co:9735 14:15 <@molz> lncli openchannel 03933884aaf1d6b108397e5efe5c86bcf2d8ca8d2f700eda99db9214fc2712b134 1000000 14:16 <@molz> ok now yalls node is online but htlc node is still offline 14:19 < lndbot1> I’ll check on it later I’m afk 14:19 < lndbot1> Yalls node was reset btw 14:21 -!- drexl [~drexl@62.112.9.166] has joined #lnd 14:23 < haakonn> molz: i have the channel now, but i get "TemporaryChannelFailure: unable to de-obfuscate onion failure" 14:24 -!- wxss [~user@109.236.91.108] has quit [Quit: leaving] 14:24 < lndbot1> molz: what's your node info? 14:25 <@molz> jimmymow i'm on the eclair wallet 14:25 < lndbot1> ah 14:30 < lndbot1> Yeah htlc lnd died 14:31 < lndbot1> Restarted, back online 14:35 < Veggen> endurance is live bit fails for me... 14:35 -!- Erik_ [b00a89b3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.176.10.137.179] has joined #lnd 14:35 < Veggen> hmmf. Too few outgoing channels. anyone create a payreq for me? ;P 14:36 < Veggen> need too test if I can pay at all now, everything fails :) 14:37 < naribia> Veggen: here: lntb10u1pd923q2pp5a4qdnn8wpqlqyxv4jdyyumuv22gxx5p7xttu4v838nkkl3lpx4msdqqcqzysc000ed8h2g497xnzgtuhc6xznf9vcwh4u6dn8hhtaz6usp0zqhz44e9809f7y855hehxf6quqtv9frh3lz47qnkgxxdzpp8laasg8vcpx6tg4l 14:39 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [] 14:48 -!- deusexbeer [~deusexbee@080-250-076-170-dynamic-pool-adsl.wbt.ru] has joined #lnd 14:50 -!- zshlyk [~zshlyk@gateway/tor-sasl/intcat] has joined #lnd 14:51 -!- intcat [~zshlyk@gateway/tor-sasl/intcat] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 14:53 < Veggen> worked. 14:54 < Veggen> ok, starblocks doesn't. 14:56 < Veggen> probably still same bug. 14:57 < Veggen> probably fixed, can't update before alex' patch is merged. 15:02 -!- Pioklo_ [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has joined #lnd 15:04 -!- pioklo [Pioklo@ip-91.246.70.194.skyware.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 15:09 -!- boldface [5501bedc@gateway/web/freenode/ip.85.1.190.220] has joined #lnd 15:10 < boldface> I have a local lnd setup with neutrino/autopilot and 1 active channel. When trying to pay the acinq starblocks shop I get "payment_error": "unable to find a path to destination" - any ideas how to solve this? 15:11 <@molz> lol.. i just found out how "Paste a payment" works on Eclair wallet works, really neat 15:11 <@molz> -works 15:25 <@roasbeef> once again, note starblokcks is a singlenode that doesn't listen, so it has pretty much zero path diversity to it 15:27 < boldface> it worked fine with the eclair wallet though .. what's the best chance of reproducing that with lnd? 15:31 <@roasbeef> eclair has a fast path, they let to go directly to the starblocks end node 15:31 <@roasbeef> everyone else must go thru endurance, a single node 15:32 -!- Pioklo_ [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 15:38 < boldface> I failed to find any info about "fast paths" .. what exactly does it mean? is it hardcoded? 15:38 <@roasbeef> yes 15:47 <@molz> i don't know starblocks' node key, have always connected to endurance 15:49 <@molz> boldface, i'm sure if you want to create a similar site like starblocks and use LND, you can 15:50 <@molz> still waiting to see roasbeef.com :D 15:50 < boldface> the starblocks node shows NO public IP 15:50 < boldface> i'm trying with endurance now 15:50 <@molz> hamburger.roasbeef.com 15:50 <@molz> sushi.roasbeef.com 15:50 <@molz> pizza.roasbeef.com 15:50 <@molz> :D 15:50 -!- poordad [473c1735@gateway/web/freenode/ip.71.60.23.53] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 15:51 -!- sato_vision [~sato_visi@172.86.120.144] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 15:52 -!- sato_vision [~sato_visi@172.86.120.144] has joined #lnd 15:53 -!- Vijay_ [1800fa7f@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.0.250.127] has joined #lnd 15:54 -!- Vijay_ [1800fa7f@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.0.250.127] has quit [Client Quit] 15:56 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] Roasbeef closed pull request #572: Fix announcements flakes (master...fix-flake-announcements) https://git.io/vNLcF 15:56 < boldface> it fails even with an active channel to endurance .. am I missing something? 15:56 <@roasbeef> something is up with endurance/starblocks 15:56 <@molz> boldface, which client are you using? 15:57 < boldface> lnd / lncli with neutrino 15:57 < boldface> latest version from github 15:59 <@molz> hm i can pay starblocks on the Eclair mobile but can't pay with my lnd nodes that runs the bitcoind patch 15:59 <@molz> let me update another lnd node and see 16:00 -!- subz [c4340218@gateway/web/freenode/ip.196.52.2.24] has joined #lnd 16:02 <@roasbeef> afaik eclair mobile makes a direct connection to the starblocks proper node 16:04 -!- subz [c4340218@gateway/web/freenode/ip.196.52.2.24] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 16:05 < boldface> is there any other demo shop on testnet? 16:07 -!- vicenteH [~user@35.233.15.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has left #lnd ["ERC (IRC client for Emacs 25.2.2)"] 16:07 < boldface> trying with bitrefill site 16:07 -!- vivek__ [~vivek@157.49.209.225] has joined #lnd 16:15 -!- drexl [~drexl@62.112.9.166] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:26 < Erik_> Does anyone know a public node I can connect to? 16:27 <@molz> sure 16:27 <@molz> https://paste.ee/p/zI79V#UFEtcKkrmKrwkwuBTcJ5rIXBoZEpkEmT 16:28 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 16:28 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:28 < Erik_> Thanks a lot 16:29 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@191.101.59.148] has joined #lnd 16:38 -!- cluelessperson [~cluelessp@unaffiliated/cluelessperson] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 16:41 -!- cluelessperson [~cluelessp@unaffiliated/cluelessperson] has joined #lnd 16:45 < kexkey> roasbeef, not sure but if you have a minute, have a look in blockchain.go line 64, shouldn't be spendReport == nil || spendReport.SpendingTx == nil ? 16:47 < kexkey> shouldn't it be 16:52 -!- simlay [~simlay@gateway/tor-sasl/simlay] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:52 -!- simlay [~simlay@gateway/tor-sasl/simlay] has joined #lnd 16:55 -!- nirved [~nirved@2a02:8071:b58a:3c00:216f:11e8:4e41:8ba1] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 16:59 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@p98110-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has joined #lnd 17:08 -!- vivek__ [~vivek@157.49.209.225] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 17:19 < Styil> getting the error "dateline exceeded" when opening a channel 17:23 <@molz> Styil, are you running LND commandline? 17:23 < Styil> lightning app 17:23 <@molz> windows? 17:23 < Styil> ye :/ 17:24 <@molz> file an issue on github 17:24 < Styil> not certain if this is a code issue to file on github, checking here first 17:25 < Styil> its fine though, currently using zap with no issues 17:25 < lndbot1> kexkey, the current check is testing to see if the SpendingTxn is populated on the spend report. If it’s present, the function returns an error indicating that the output was spent 17:28 < lndbot1> Styil, do you mean deadline exceeded? 17:28 < Styil> I try to open a channel using Lightning App 17:29 < lndbot1> If so that’s a grpc error 17:29 < Styil> I get a notification at the bottom right that says "Dateline Exceeded" 17:29 -!- x_ [~x@76.14.28.158] has joined #lnd 17:29 < kexkey> conner, oh I see, thanks for checking. I got a segmentation fault on line 68 because spendReport was null, I thought the check on line 64 wasn't ok. 17:31 < lndbot1> Styil, give 5 mins to get home and then I’ll look into it a little more 17:31 < Styil> conner, could it be because I am not running BTCD? 17:31 < Styil> must I run BTCD for lightning app? 17:31 < lndbot1> kexkey, that’s good to know. The check would definitely allow nil valued spend reports to fall through. We might need to add an additional check there 17:34 < kexkey> conner, not sure how this can happen (yesterday everything was running smoothly and I didn't update code) but it happened. Do you want me to open an issue? 17:38 < lndbot1> Styil, you shouldn’t have to. It should be using neutrino and bootstrapping via DNS 17:39 < Styil> just checking, heard something about that 17:39 -!- ajunas [adefe8a5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.173.239.232.165] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 17:40 < lndbot1> kexkey, i think i found the culprit 17:40 < kexkey> conner, you're fast! :) 17:41 < lndbot1> https://github.com/lightninglabs/neutrino/blob/master/rescan.go#L995 17:41 < lndbot1> hehe :slightly_smiling_face: in this line of code, we return a nil error and a nil spend report 17:43 < lndbot1> we just need an extra check blockchain.go to handle this case 17:44 -!- belcher_ [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 17:45 -!- madness [4fb60179@gateway/web/freenode/ip.79.182.1.121] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 17:46 < kexkey> conner is da man! 17:48 -!- jonsykkle [~jonsykkel@178.62.10.8] has joined #lnd 17:50 < lndbot1> Styil, I grepped around in all of our repos for dateline exceeded, nothing showed up on google searchs either 17:50 < lndbot1> You sure it’s not this https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42973191/how-to-solve-grpc-deadline-exceeded-error 17:50 < lndbot1> ? 17:51 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] valentinewallace opened pull request #580: Add tests + checks for invoice field lengths. (master...check-invoice-field-lens) https://git.io/vNmEu 17:52 < lndbot1> Styil, I would suggest opening an issue as we should probably be handling that error more gracefully 17:54 < Styil> hmm 17:54 < Styil> cant replicate it right now it seems after restarting the app 17:54 < Styil> ill keep trying to see it 17:55 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:56 -!- pera [~pera@unaffiliated/pera] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 17:58 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 18:05 -!- Erik_ [b00a89b3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.176.10.137.179] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 18:19 -!- pera [~pera@unaffiliated/pera] has joined #lnd 18:20 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] cfromknecht opened pull request #581: Properly Handle Nil Spend Report from Neutrino Rescan (master...handle-nil-spend-report) https://git.io/vNmzg 18:21 < lndbot1> kexkey, i think this should fix your issue :slightly_smiling_face: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/581 18:21 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@191.101.59.148] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 18:21 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@191.101.59.148] has joined #lnd 18:22 < lndbot1> do you have any logs from when it panicked? i would be interested to see what might have caused this behavior 18:47 < kexkey> conner, Travis is mad. :P 18:47 < kexkey> yes 18:55 < kexkey> conner, I just saved the log of the first time it happened 18:57 < kexkey> conner, I'm reading the log and just noticed that I ctrl-C'ed lnd just before it happened the first time. May be related... 18:58 < kexkey> conner, "Gracefully shutting down" is not so graceful I guess. :) 19:10 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 19:14 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #lnd 19:18 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Client Quit] 19:33 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 19:35 < lightningbot4> kexkey, just some normal flakes on travis, restarting the failed tests 19:35 < lightningbot4> interesting about ctrl-c, can you throw the logs on pastebin? 19:36 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@191.101.59.148] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 19:40 -!- tuxcanfly [~tuxcanfly@146.185.169.116] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 19:40 -!- tuxcanfly [~tuxcanfly@146.185.169.116] has joined #lnd 19:41 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 19:42 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@81.17.17.119] has joined #lnd 20:03 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 20:06 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@81.17.17.119] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 20:07 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 20:07 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@46.243.136.13] has joined #lnd 20:30 -!- pera [~pera@unaffiliated/pera] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:30 -!- IniGit [~Gernot@62.178.56.62] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 20:54 -!- JackH_ [~laptop@aqk142.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #lnd 20:58 -!- JackH [~laptop@amb191.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 21:03 -!- simlay [~simlay@gateway/tor-sasl/simlay] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 21:09 -!- simlay [~simlay@gateway/tor-sasl/simlay] has joined #lnd 21:12 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 21:15 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@46.243.136.13] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 21:24 <@roasbeef> vim briefcase.go 21:32 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 21:33 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@46.243.136.40] has joined #lnd 21:37 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 21:42 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 21:42 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@46.243.136.40] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 21:42 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@46.243.136.14] has joined #lnd 22:24 -!- x_ [~x@76.14.28.158] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 22:32 -!- CubicEar_ [~cubiceart@c-73-181-185-197.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 22:34 -!- CubicEarths [~cubiceart@46.243.136.14] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 22:50 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-arowxvfimkitqwyq] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 23:32 -!- naribia [adefe8a5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.173.239.232.165] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 23:33 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] wilmerpaulino opened pull request #585: lncli: add 'connect' flag to openchannel command (master...openchannel-connect) https://git.io/vNmMR