--- Day changed Sat Feb 03 2018 00:00 -!- bryan_w [~is@2600:2108:9:8a90:5a69:d114:68b8:dae2] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 00:00 -!- pioklo [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has joined #lnd 00:03 -!- Pioklo_ [Pioklo@ip-91.246.70.194.skyware.pl] has joined #lnd 00:03 -!- MaxSan [~user@86.105.9.67] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 00:04 -!- Styils [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 00:05 -!- Styils [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 00:06 -!- pioklo [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 00:20 -!- Styils [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 01:20 -!- Blackadderrr [~blackadde@94.242.246.20] has joined #lnd 01:27 -!- erols [~erols@2001:1c02:2d0f:6b00:1475:a492:e97e:a731] has joined #lnd 01:33 -!- BashCo_ [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has joined #lnd 01:36 -!- BashCo [~BashCo@unaffiliated/bashco] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 01:36 -!- kemi [6d817cdb@gateway/web/freenode/ip.109.129.124.219] has joined #lnd 01:38 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #lnd 01:40 < kemi> Hi all, finally synced a full node. At the stop it says Go 1.9.1 is the recommended version, but when I try to install version 1.9.1 I can't find it. I used sudo apt-get install golang-1.9.1 01:55 < lndbot> I installed golang-1.9-go, which puts the go binary in /usr/lib/go-1.9/bin/, which you can then just add to your $PATH. 01:56 < lndbot> I think Ubuntu's repos have like virtual packages for Go or something, which makes it kind of confusing 01:59 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 02:08 -!- RusAlex_ [~Chel@89-212-19-164.static.t-2.net] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.9.1] 02:09 -!- RusAlex [~Chel@unaffiliated/rusalex] has joined #lnd 02:13 < lndbot> kemi: https://paste.ee/p/b0n35#8ckJAm8fNcJEydZhyQBrIKLdblLMsSOE 02:21 < erols> Hi. I used `lncli payinvoice` to make a payment to y'alls. However I don't see it in the docs at http://api.lightning.community - Is it deprecated or is it new? 02:39 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@209-204-163-3.vpn.sonic.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 03:03 < cryptodechange> how does one close an inactive channel? listchannel gives me chan_id=0 03:13 < lndbot> if the other node is online to do a cooperative close, `lncli closechannel --sat_per_byte [how many satoshis per byte you want to pay] [funding txid] [output index]` 03:14 < lndbot> if the channel is offline and you want to force close the channel, `lncli closechannel --force [funding txid] [output index]` though I don't know that output index is necessary 03:15 < lndbot> on another note, is there a way currently to balance your channels by paying out one channel and receiving your own payment on a different channel? 03:16 < cryptodechange> Can I close pending channels? 03:19 < lndbot> I don't think so. I think you have to wait for the channel to either get fully confirmed or if it never gets mined, wait for lnd to mark it as failed, if it even does that. I'm not sure. 03:20 -!- kunla [~kunla@bl13-61-148.dsl.telepac.pt] has joined #lnd 03:21 < cryptodechange> Ok thanks. What part of the channel info is the funding transaction? 03:22 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 03:22 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has joined #lnd 03:24 < lndbot> `channel_point`, and the `:0` or `:1` on the end refer to the output index 03:24 < lndbot> in the future those numbers might be bigger 03:25 -!- kemi [6d817cdb@gateway/web/freenode/ip.109.129.124.219] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 03:27 < cryptodechange> One of my pending channel are not visible on the blockchain, looks like it wasn't broadcast or something 03:27 < cryptodechange> can I get rid of it? 03:27 < cryptodechange> is not* 03:30 < BB-Martino> ps. I was reminded of the mention of "closechannel" - when I first tried to use it, it said the argument needs to be the *funding txid*. That would have been kind of annoying. I found out it didn't really want the funding txid, not the "chan_id" but "channel_point" - but that was kind of a bruteforce to figure out. 03:36 < cryptodechange> I think channel_point==funding_id 03:36 < cryptodechange> funding txid* 03:41 < lndbot> yes, that's correct 03:42 < lndbot> channel point just means the point on the blockchain where the channel was opened, which is identified by a TXID but since there are two parties, just TXID isn't sufficient. the client also needs to know which output is theirs, thus TXID:output index, which is called a channel point 03:44 < cryptodechange> I'm getting [lncli] rpc error: code = Unknown desc = channel with chan_id=X not found 03:44 < cryptodechange> When trying to close a channel with "active": false 03:45 -!- wxss [~user@185.38.150.120] has joined #lnd 03:46 < lndbot> you need to --force 03:46 < lndbot> if active : false 03:46 < cryptodechange> \o/ 03:46 -!- Blackadderrr [~blackadde@94.242.246.20] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 03:46 < cryptodechange> thanks! 03:47 -!- wxss [~user@185.38.150.120] has quit [Client Quit] 03:48 -!- wxss [~user@185.38.150.120] has joined #lnd 03:51 -!- wxss [~user@185.38.150.120] has quit [Client Quit] 03:51 -!- wxss [~user@130.185.151.235] has joined #lnd 03:57 -!- sovjet [~sovjet@user182.c2.sevnica.kabelnet.net] has joined #lnd 04:03 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 04:06 -!- someone235 [~someone23@unaffiliated/someone235] has joined #lnd 04:17 -!- nirved [~nirved@2a02:8071:b58a:3c00:a8f5:b3a8:c4c1:7a80] has joined #lnd 04:20 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/saleemrashid] has joined #lnd 04:39 -!- Guest11379 [~x@2001:8b0:121b:8547:229d:7220:32cb:75d0] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 04:45 -!- bitconto [~bitconto@31.7.63.198] has joined #lnd 05:15 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 05:18 -!- Soopaman [~soopaman@198.16.243.66] has joined #lnd 05:32 < someone235> Hi, which GUI wallet is recommended? I want to have two testnet wallets and transact to myself 05:33 < cryptodechange> someone235, Zap is a desktop wallet that uses lnd 05:34 < someone235> cryptodechange, is it possible to have two wallets at once on the same computer? 05:34 < cryptodechange> You mean addresses? 05:35 -!- Soopaman [~soopaman@198.16.243.66] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 05:35 < cryptodechange> Simultaneously, sure, you'd need to recompile zap with some extra params to use a different datadir to the default 05:35 < someone235> cryptodechange, I want to have two different addresses, and two different lightning public keys 05:36 < someone235> cryptodechange, hmm, I need to actually recompile for this? 05:36 < someone235> cryptodechange, if I'll use lnd directly from CLI it should work without recompiling I guess, right? 05:36 < cryptodechange> https://github.com/LN-Zap/zap-desktop/blob/master/app/main.dev.js 05:37 < cryptodechange> Add a new line after 148 05:37 < cryptodechange> '--datadir=/New', 05:37 < cryptodechange> Change that to wherever you want lnd to store your second wallet 05:38 < cryptodechange> so on windows it could be C:\Users\Account\AppData\Local\Lnd2 05:38 < someone235> I guess I'll just use lnd directly 05:38 < someone235> it'll be much easier 05:42 -!- erols [~erols@2001:1c02:2d0f:6b00:1475:a492:e97e:a731] has quit [Quit: erols] 05:48 -!- bjh4 [~bjh4@cpe-173-95-130-175.nc.res.rr.com] has joined #lnd 05:48 -!- someone235 [~someone23@unaffiliated/someone235] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 05:49 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #lnd 05:51 -!- someone235 [~someone23@unaffiliated/someone235] has joined #lnd 05:53 < bjh4> I'm trying to compile lnd from a git clone. 'glide install' is throwing errors while version checking. Do I need to modify the yaml file? https://pastebin.com/FFuEtMwQ 05:57 < cryptodechange> tried sudo? 05:58 < bjh4> @cryptodechange I just figured it out. Old glide cache needed to be cleared 06:07 < cryptodechange> Where can I find the transactions that are contributing to 'unconfirmed_balance'? 06:08 < lndbot> `lncli pendingchannels` 06:08 < lndbot> or wait 06:08 -!- tenev [~tenev@87.126.41.46] has joined #lnd 06:08 < lndbot> there are a few situations where your balance would go to pending 06:08 < lndbot> every time you do it yourself, it should kick out a txid 06:09 < cryptodechange> I have one in pending_force_closing_channels, but it's fully confirmed on the blockchain, and the amount doesn't match what's in my unconfirmed_balance 06:09 < cryptodechange> "limbo_balance": "226923" 06:09 < cryptodechange> "unconfirmed_balance": "598522" 06:09 < lndbot> force closed channels have a timelock 06:09 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #lnd 06:10 < lndbot> I think the default is often 144 blocks 06:10 < cryptodechange> Ah I see, the maturity_height 06:10 < cryptodechange> but my limbo balance is inconsistent with my unconfirmed? 06:11 < lndbot> not sure, I know local balances take into account `commit_fee`s 06:12 < lndbot> `lncli listchannels` `lncli channelbalance` `lncli pendingchannels` `lncli walletbalance` 06:12 < lndbot> compare the outputs of these and see if you can find the source of the discrepancy I'd say 06:13 < cryptodechange> listchannels empty, channelbalance 0 06:13 < cryptodechange> pendingchannels total_limbo_balance": "226923" 06:13 < mlz> you're using an older commit, joe 06:14 < cryptodechange> { "total_balance": "625053", "confirmed_balance": "26531", "unconfirmed_balance": "598522" } 06:17 < cryptodechange> I have a pending_open_channel on another wallet.db that was never broadcast 06:19 < cryptodechange> When I try to force close 06:19 < cryptodechange> rpc error: code = Unknown desc = -25: Missing inputs 06:23 -!- kunla [~kunla@bl13-61-148.dsl.telepac.pt] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 06:25 -!- kunla [~kunla@bl10-85-39.dsl.telepac.pt] has joined #lnd 06:28 < cryptodechange> Going through all of my unspent outputs, I should have a total balance of ~868572, "total_balance": "625053", 06:32 < mlz> look at your commit fees 06:35 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qittimexvownqspw] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 06:38 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #lnd 06:39 < bitconto> whats the difference between the on-chain fee to open a channel and the 'commit fee', it's not the same right? 06:40 < lndbot> commit fee is like, a chunk of the local balance reserved to pay miners fees when you broadcast the final state of the channel to close it 06:47 < cryptodechange> So with my pending_force_closed_channels (226923) and my total_balance (625053), it seems about right 06:48 < cryptodechange> But I don't know why my unconfirmed_balance is still there, as it's not reflected in my pendingchannels 06:49 < cryptodechange> As I was expecting 868572, and see 851976 in my unconfirmed and pending channels, I presume 16596 was my commit fee 06:50 < cryptodechange> It would be nice to see the txids, channel_points, etc that make up my unconfirmed balance 06:50 < cryptodechange> nice to see a breakdown of* 06:52 -!- bryan_w [~is@2600:2108:9:8a90:5a69:d114:68b8:dae2] has joined #lnd 07:14 -!- tenev [~tenev@87.126.41.46] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 07:20 -!- oogle [~user@185.45.13.11] has joined #lnd 07:20 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/saleemrashid] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1] 07:22 -!- Osso [~osso@2600:1700:37a0:1068::2] has joined #lnd 07:25 < oogle> I just upgraded my lnd client with these three steps: "git pull; glide install; go install . ./cmd/..." Since then my wallet passphrase will not work. ~/.lnd/ seems to not be changed so I don't really understand what I did wrong, any ideas? 07:31 < lndbot> yes, there have probably been so called 'breaking changes' since you last updated, so you have to go back, close the channels first and then update 07:32 -!- smash_ [640f7bf4@gateway/web/freenode/ip.100.15.123.244] has joined #lnd 07:32 < lndbot> not 100% sure if that already causes the wallet unlock to fail though, maybe somebody else knows 07:35 < oogle> thx, how can I backup/restore the wallet? 07:39 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@c-24-4-228-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 07:39 < oogle> nm, I just keep a copy of the whole ~/.lnd/ 07:39 < Ulmo2> some rando posted a medium saying an Antminer S5 works to solo mine coins on testnet at https://medium.com/@lopp/how-to-solo-mine-on-bitcoin-s-testnet-6073c917b495 and that was 2.5 years ago. I already had Bitcoin to seed my mainnet LN nodes, but where do I get testnet coins? 07:40 < oogle> Ulmo2: in chan topic: https://faucet.lightning.community/ 07:41 < oogle> also just google "bitcoin testnet faucet" 07:43 < cryptodechange> oogle, make sure to copy both your wallet.db and channel.db over 07:43 < cryptodechange> Don't make my mistake and forget the channel.db 07:47 -!- Pioklo_ [Pioklo@ip-91.246.70.194.skyware.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 07:48 < oogle> cryptodechange: thx 07:48 < Ulmo2> lnc newaddress p2wkh: [lncli] rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = grpc: the connection is unavailable................earlier I had: 2018-02-03 07:46:55.657 [ERR] RPCS: unable to shutdown password gRPC proxy: close tcp 127.0.0.1:8080: use of closed network connection; I never authorized anything on port 8080, and I don't see grpc documented anywhere. What's going on? 07:48 < Ulmo2> oogle thanks 07:50 < oogle> Ulmo2: you might have something else running on 8080 it's a pretty popular port. Check with netstat what has 8080 open. 07:50 < oogle> on linux: netstat -antlop 07:50 < oogle> on win: netstat -ano 07:50 < Ulmo2> oogle: I don't. 07:51 < oogle> maybe another instance of lnd? 07:51 < Ulmo2> It's not running. How would that affect it? 07:51 < Ulmo2> I have two btcd's. 07:52 < Ulmo2> The thing is I have no idea why it's using gprc and port 8080 if I already set up a rpc and rpc has config settings but grpc doesn't. grpc is also not documented. What is it referring to? 07:52 < oogle> you have to check with netstat what is open on 8080. 07:53 < Ulmo2> wait I'm getting this too, so I'm going to poke away more. btcd: 2018/02/03 07:53:26 http: TLS handshake error from 127.0.0.1:55174: remote error: tls: bad certificate 08:07 -!- oogle [~user@185.45.13.11] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 08:12 < Ulmo2> 2018-02-03 08:11:43.476 [INF] LNWL: Opened wallet 08:12 < Ulmo2> 2018-02-03 08:11:43.477 [ERR] RPCS: unable to shutdown password gRPC proxy: close tcp 127.0.0.1:8080: use of closed network connection 08:12 < Ulmo2> is that a warning or an err? 08:13 < Ulmo2> 2018/02/03 08:11:48 http: TLS handshake error from 127.0.0.1:35730: remote error: tls: bad certificate 08:13 < Ulmo2> never mind .. it's happening again. 08:21 -!- smash_ [640f7bf4@gateway/web/freenode/ip.100.15.123.244] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:27 < Ulmo2> fixed it. too many of roasbeef's defaults use the username's home directory rather than the login home directory, oddly enough. I wonder if it is hardcoded into the local binary compiliation in go. 08:33 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 08:39 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 08:40 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [Client Quit] 08:40 < Ulmo2> This is the sort of thing that makes me mad: unable to create chain control: open /home/testnet/.btcd/rpc.cert): no such file or directory BUT THE FILE EXISTS. 08:41 < Ulmo2> oh wait -- forgot the parenthesis. 08:41 < Ulmo2> they used to use [] rather than () 08:44 < mlz> like 30 yrs ago? 08:44 < mlz> or 50 yrs when they used to use fortran and ada and cobol? 08:50 -!- ChunkyPuffs [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has joined #lnd 08:52 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 08:58 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #lnd 09:29 -!- oogle [~user@185.45.13.11] has joined #lnd 09:32 < oogle> does --sat_per_byte work for openchannel? Twice I've set the flag to "2", but the tx still uses over 100 sat/b. Here is an example of my cmd: lncli openchannel --sat_per_byte 2 --local_amt 150000 --node_key 02.... 09:33 -!- jukuli [jrasi@kapsi.fi] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 09:33 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 09:36 < oogle> I'm on master if it matters 09:38 -!- fra [6d4958da@gateway/web/freenode/ip.109.73.88.218] has joined #lnd 09:59 -!- ChunkyPuffs [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 10:03 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #lnd 10:08 -!- ctrlbreak [~ctrlbreak@fctnnbsc38w-47-55-95-227.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 10:08 < oogle> I see there's already an issue: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/620 10:16 -!- go1111111 [go1111111@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/go1111111] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 10:37 -!- hbastidas [ba5d4e64@gateway/web/freenode/ip.186.93.78.100] has joined #lnd 10:37 < hbastidas> hello guys 10:38 < hbastidas> i have this -> "[lncli] rpc error: code = Unknown desc = wallet not found" 10:43 < hbastidas> I updated the node, then it broke. I'll go back to commit d66528c7 that worked for me. 10:44 < mlz> hbastidas, did you close all your channels and remove the old channel.db before you updated? 10:45 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 10:47 < hbastidas> I didn't do it. mlz 10:48 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@c-24-4-228-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 10:48 < hbastidas> That must be the procedure forever? mlz 10:48 < mlz> no 10:50 < mlz> devs are working on the code so there are breaking changes in updates, so we have to do this procedure, unless you want to have a lightning implementation that only works half ass 10:55 < hbastidas> I imagine they programmed a command like lncli update to do all these tasks. 11:01 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #lnd 11:01 < lndbot> once it's ready for primetime, migrations will be handled gracefully but no reason for the devs to tiptoe at this point 11:04 < hbastidas> thanks to everyone!! 11:04 -!- hbastidas [ba5d4e64@gateway/web/freenode/ip.186.93.78.100] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 11:06 < blademccool> my lnd sees a graph with 736 addresses advertised from a total of 684 nodes. however it can only actually connect to 82 of those addresses at the moment. when do unreachable nodes go away from the graph, or do they? 11:07 < blademccool> so this also is to say that testnet appears to only actually have 82 reachable nodes rn 11:10 < mlz> blademccool, are you connected to a node that starts with "03ac6927" ? 11:12 -!- go1111111 [go1111111@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/go1111111] has joined #lnd 11:12 < blademccool> mlz: dont think so no, not seeing that string in my logs 11:12 < mlz> blademccool, it's a reachable node but your node can't see.. so im not sure how we can tell how many nodes on testnet are reachable 11:14 < blademccool> hrm weird. does it advertise itself? why wouldnt it appear in the graph? 11:14 < blademccool> i havent read that part yet how that works. just putzin with autopilot but i didnt like how autopilot seemed to spend most of its time creating directives to make channels with nodes that arent actually online. 11:19 -!- oogle [~user@185.45.13.11] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 11:29 < mlz> blademccool, i think you can't see it because it doesn't have a channel yet, but it's reachable if you know it 11:30 < blademccool> oh. yes. hrm, the graph only shows nodes with channels. gggggrrrrraah 11:31 < mlz> yea i've been wondering how we can see nodes that have never had a channel 11:32 < blademccool> but if he doesnt have a channel, who am i to take on the responsibility of bootstrapping into the network. so then maybe it is more reasonable to say only 82 nodes are online with established channels. 11:33 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@c-24-4-228-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 11:33 < Ulmo2> yay! I got up lnd, btcd (and lighting-c, bitcoind) on testnet alongside all the same on mainnet (except lnd mainnet). 11:36 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 11:37 < cryptodechange> Is there a reason why channel.db and wallet.db are separate? 11:37 < Ulmo2> Here's one big reason to test on mainnet, which doesn't have this rediculous restriction: [lncli] rpc error: code = Unknown desc = funding amount is too large, the max channel size is: 0.16777216 BTC 11:38 < pigeons> mainnet does have that restriction 11:38 < Ulmo2> lightning-c also has the same restriction: { "code" : -1, "message" : "Funding satoshi must be <= 16777215" } 11:38 < cryptodechange> As both are holding keys to user funds, wouldn't it make sense to merge the two db formats? 11:38 < Ulmo2> oh; I did not know. 11:39 < cryptodechange> On mainnet I have funded channels with 0.00001 BTC 11:39 < Ulmo2> my mistake. I thought I opened a channel at .2 once. 11:39 < pigeons> if the implementation follows the BOLT, that restriction is in place for now 11:39 < pigeons> largest payment is 1/4 of that 11:40 < cryptodechange> "unconfirmed_balance": "598522" 11:40 < cryptodechange> :( I wish I can find out why that's still there 11:40 < cryptodechange> All of my outputs are fully confirmed (from my initial on chain txn) 11:40 < Ulmo2> I have a weekday job that takes minimum 113 of 144 weekly hours of my time, so I haven't had time to read the BOLT spec. My bad. 11:42 < pigeons> Some people would prefer it wasn't there, but its seems it will be for the start 11:42 < cryptodechange> This roasbea 11:43 < cryptodechange> But this was roasbeef's original vision /s 11:43 < pigeons> poon and adaibat's original vision 11:47 -!- go1111111 [go1111111@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/go1111111] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 11:52 -!- JackH [~laptop@host-80-47-85-14.as13285.net] has joined #lnd 11:53 < cryptodechange> Is there a way to expose the private keys of each on-chain address? 11:53 < cryptodechange> or even a list of where the walletbalance is coming from? It'd be nice to get to the bottom of why this balance is not confirming 11:54 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/saleemrashid] has joined #lnd 11:54 < blademccool> the funding limit could be removed between two nodes that agree to remove it tho, no? all they'd have to do is run hacked code 11:55 < blademccool> or what ... how would other nodes handle the graph if 2 rogue nodes were advertising a active channel with 1BTC in it? 11:56 -!- ghj [bc393a9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.57.58.157] has joined #lnd 11:56 < ghj> hi 11:56 < ghj> is mainnet started? 11:57 < blademccool> ghj: only you can start mainnet. 11:57 < cryptodechange> I would say not yet, but I would be a hypocrite :P 11:57 < cryptodechange> So I'll let mlz say no 11:58 < ghj> testnet finished? 11:58 < blademccool> i heard someone bought stickers via mainnet ln, so mainnet must be started. 11:58 < spudowiar> cryptodechange: Haha :) 11:58 < spudowiar> My mainnet explorer is making progress. I have tooltips like ACINQ 11:58 < cryptodechange> Someone used Bitbargain's lightning wallet to buy a t-shirt from Blockstream 11:58 < ghj> can we earn fee now from mainnet nodes? 11:58 < blademccool> spudowiar: will yours drop nodes that havent been seen in a while? 11:59 < spudowiar> blademccool: No 11:59 < spudowiar> blademccool: I could add that though 11:59 < cryptodechange> Do nodes stay open forever until they are closed manually then? 11:59 < blademccool> or a toggle like 'only show nodes seen since date x' could be cool 11:59 < cryptodechange> My understanding was that if a node was offline for a long time, the online node would close it? 12:00 < spudowiar> blademccool: Shouldn't be hard to add (with the lastUpdate property) 12:00 < ghj> adding each node require fee? 12:01 < ghj> or only one fee 12:01 < cryptodechange> It requires a fee to open and close the channel 12:01 < cryptodechange> Which are the on-chain transaction fees 12:01 < spudowiar> blademccool: I could also just make the opacity of the nodes relative to when they were last seen 12:01 < ghj> how the people will know our channel? system automacially or not 12:02 < spudowiar> blademccool: i.e. Old nodes are almost completely transparent and new nodes are opaque 12:03 < cryptodechange> --autopilot would open channels for you depending on the BTC on your chain address 12:03 < mlz> cryptodechange, lmao 12:03 < blademccool> spudowiar: some cool ideas for sure. looking forward to see the end result :) 12:03 < spudowiar> blademccool: Have you seen the existing images I've posted? 12:03 < ghj> when we start to earn fee? 12:04 < ghj> from the transactions 12:04 < blademccool> spudowiar: havent no 12:04 < spudowiar> blademccool: https://twitter.com/spudowiar/status/958056758131544064 12:04 < cryptodechange> Hop fees, but you need to have a good route between nodes for people to use it 12:04 < spudowiar> It live-updates from lnd :) 12:04 < blademccool> ghj: when your node routes a tx, you can earn a fee. make a big node with lots of funds locked up, advertise it as being able to pay the sticker people. or something 12:04 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #lnd 12:04 < cryptodechange> And of course, you need people to actually use lightning for payments, which people are not doing much of yet on mainnet 12:05 < cryptodechange> Lots of nodes, lots of channels, not much use 12:05 < cryptodechange> And you'll earn ~microsatoshis for a hop 12:05 < blademccool> spudowiar: ahh yeah nice 12:05 < ghj> is raspberry pi 3 enough for the sys requirements , what is the mininum sys requirements 12:06 < cryptodechange> For a GUI, your raspbery pi will set aflame as soon as you try to view the node map 12:06 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@c-24-4-228-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 12:06 < cryptodechange> findroute is pretty intensive too 12:08 < cryptodechange> I mean, it doesn't hurt to run the testnet one just I did for a total of 5 minutes before compiling to mainnet 12:08 < cryptodechange> I did/have lost bitcoin (atm), but that's my fault 12:09 < ghj> if i will not view the node map, is raspi enough for the running node? 12:09 < cryptodechange> Well it doesn't hurt to just try the testnet lnd and find out yourself 12:11 < ghj> is there any step by step guide for this 12:11 < ghj> ? 12:11 < ghj> türkçe bilen var mı? 12:12 < cryptodechange> The easiest way is to try Zap on windows or something 12:12 < cryptodechange> Then go backwards, lnd 12:13 < cryptodechange> See it working in a GUI, then try the commands 12:13 < ghj> ok thank you 12:13 < ghj> only zap is enough for win? 12:13 < ghj> i read it before the zap 12:15 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/saleemrashid] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1] 12:15 < cryptodechange> It was only a suggestion, you can compile and run lnd yourself too 12:15 < ghj> thank you for your all answers 12:16 < ghj> i hope ln will rescue btc 12:18 -!- ghj [bc393a9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.57.58.157] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 12:20 < mlz> cryptodechange, i have two nodes on mainnet, but you don't see me harrass the devs for help when you should've already known on testnet 12:21 < mlz> i think the devs wouldn't care if you know what you do, and matter of fact they like for you to run nodes on mainnet if you can and figure out yourself but because mainnet is full of outdated code and noobs who just want to get on mainnet for silly reasons 12:22 -!- rhavar_ [uid237883@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fcaakowuvclojzph] has joined #lnd 12:24 < cryptodechange> I agree, but harassing? what? 12:25 < cryptodechange> Was that a generalisation or were you incinuating I am doing that? 12:26 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qzmdojsgrjkzyekp] has joined #lnd 12:26 < cryptodechange> :| 12:30 < cryptodechange> But a problem I highlighted regarding wallet.db and channel.db, regardless if it was a known issue or not, I believe was valid 12:30 < cryptodechange> They should be consolodated into one file 12:30 < cryptodechange> consolidated* 12:31 < mlz> code it up and submit a PR, joe 12:31 < mlz> you still don't know what's in the channel.db and what's in the wallet.db do you 12:33 < cryptodechange> I'm browsing the contents now 12:34 < cryptodechange> joe? Are you australian or something? 12:34 < cryptodechange> what? 12:34 < mlz> shit? 12:35 < mlz> im still waiting for you to edit the channel.db too 12:35 < mlz> and teach me how, genius 12:35 < cryptodechange> I can't edit it without it being corrupted cap'n 12:35 < mlz> ah.. so you finally figured out 12:36 < cryptodechange> https://github.com/br0xen/boltbrowser 12:36 <@roasbeef> cryptodechange: if you're connected to a node that doesn't recognize segwit, then you may get that missing inputs error. 12:37 < cryptodechange> @roasbeef I think the pending channel was never broadcasted on chain 12:38 < cryptodechange> Does it check whether or not the funding txn is still in mempool? 12:38 < mlz> roasbeef, he's running a very old commit 12:38 < cryptodechange> c'mon now guy 12:38 <@roasbeef> cryptodechange: no thye shouldn't be in one file, they're very distinct databases 12:39 < cryptodechange> It's the latest pull!" 12:39 < mlz> i would teach him how to run a current version on mainnet but since he's suck a dick... 12:39 < mlz> oop such* 12:39 < cryptodechange> uh... 12:39 < cryptodechange> Well that's the first time I've ever been called a dick in my time in crypto 12:39 <@roasbeef> waxwing: what do you think of this? https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/719#issuecomment-362769025 12:39 <@roasbeef> value of N still to be tuned 12:40 <@roasbeef> to fiddle with it so we get a sane number of words when encoded 12:41 < cryptodechange> @mlz C:\Go\src\github.com\lightningnetwork\lnd>git pull Already up to date. 12:41 < cryptodechange> :( 12:41 <@roasbeef> cryptodechange: relax 12:42 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/saleemrashid] has joined #lnd 12:42 <@roasbeef> they can't be consolidated as their diff sources of storage all together, channel.db will always be there for lnd, but wallet.db depends on the wallet backend, and it's mostly encrypted 12:43 < cryptodechange> I see, makes sense 12:45 < waxwing> roasbeef, interesting, i'll take a look. one thing from reading motivation: you might want to ask thomasv why he doesn't have birthday, because i for sure remember him mentioning that (and of course versioning was why he didn't/doesn't like bip39, or one reason anyway) 12:45 <@roasbeef> well for electrum they just hit a server 12:45 <@roasbeef> whcih has an address index 12:45 <@roasbeef> so for them it doesn't matter 12:45 <@roasbeef> while for our light client, we'd like to avoid hitting such a server 12:46 -!- tenev [~tenev@87-126-41-46.ip.btc-net.bg] has joined #lnd 12:46 <@roasbeef> waxwing: electrum's version is weird tho 12:46 <@roasbeef> they like tack on a nonce to brute force the hash to be a paerticualr prefix 12:46 <@roasbeef> while this just enciphers our seed description 12:46 <@roasbeef> the evolution on this then would be to describe the key derivation schema for all the relevant keys we need 12:47 <@roasbeef> so 5 sub-trees 12:47 < cryptodechange> Is there a way to see the breakdown of inputs that make up walletbalance? I've had an unconfirmed balance for a while, following all of my transactions since my initial funding, all have been confirmed. 12:47 <@roasbeef> then given a seed, and a static channel description (doesn't have pubkeysm but just sub-tree #4, index #5) you can reconstruct all you need to import/export a channel (aside from dynanic data) 12:47 < cryptodechange> There is one force-closed txn that is waiting for maturity but I don't think that's the cause 12:47 <@roasbeef> the force close one you might get back in a day or so 12:48 <@roasbeef> depends on how small the output was, there's an existing bug related to trying to sweep outputs that are too small 12:48 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 12:48 < cryptodechange> { "total_balance": "625053", "confirmed_balance": "26531", "unconfirmed_balance": "598522" } 12:49 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has joined #lnd 12:49 < cryptodechange> closing txn: "limbo_balance": "226923" 12:53 < mlz> cryptodechange, what do you have when you do "git show"? 12:53 < cryptodechange> commit bba2ff1871afb23313e974e67cc2e5b1cb925332 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) 12:54 <@roasbeef> sent a buncha payments over tor last night, it felt right 12:54 <@roasbeef> kek 12:54 <@roasbeef> cryptodechange: limbo balances aren't showed in unconfirmed as they're in special outputs the intenral wallet doesn't know about 12:55 < spudowiar> roasbeef: git grep kek | wc -l 12:55 < spudowiar> 14 12:55 <@roasbeef> lol 12:55 < spudowiar> I'm surprised it wasn't higher :) 12:55 < cryptodechange> Hm I figured, now to just figure out how/where the unconfirmed balance is coming from 12:57 -!- drrty [~newuser@209.205.124.54] has joined #lnd 13:04 < mlz> roasbeef, payments over tor on mainnet? 13:05 <@roasbeef> testnet 13:05 < mlz> oh 13:05 <@roasbeef> have a patch to also pipe neutrino over tor 13:09 < cryptodechange> am digging through waddrmgr and wtxmgr 13:13 -!- wxss [~user@130.185.151.235] has quit [Quit: leaving] 13:22 < cryptodechange> roasbeef, is there a straight forward way to recover the private keys used by lnd? 13:22 < cryptodechange> for the main wallet 13:29 < cryptodechange> :/ 13:50 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-50.dc.dc.cox.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 13:53 < cryptodechange> When trying to send [lncli] rpc error: code = Unknown desc = insufficient funds available to construct transaction 13:53 < cryptodechange> Is it possible that the input was spent on a different channel.db, and is not reflected in the other channel.db? 13:57 -!- blademccool [~BladeMcCo@node-1w7jr9ss1inb968eucy9yen8e.ipv6.telus.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 14:06 -!- bitconto [~bitconto@31.7.63.198] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 14:07 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 14:09 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #lnd 14:14 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@c-24-4-228-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 14:24 -!- dviola [~diego@unaffiliated/dviola] has joined #lnd 14:24 < dviola> hi 14:25 < dviola> does lnd works with bitcoin core (bitcoind) just fine? 14:25 < dviola> last I checked there was a pull request to make it work, or some patches, but I'm not updated on that 14:26 -!- Lairem [b968b86b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.185.104.184.107] has joined #lnd 14:28 -!- blademccool [~BladeMcCo@node-1w7jr9ss1inbb4e2xtvc90c4q.ipv6.telus.net] has joined #lnd 14:28 < lndbot> Yes bitcoind is supported now 14:28 < pigeons> seems to work if you have zmq socket and txindex 14:29 -!- sovjet [~sovjet@user182.c2.sevnica.kabelnet.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 14:30 -!- spudowiar [~spudowiar@unaffiliated/saleemrashid] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1] 14:31 < Ulmo2> djseeds, I wish I knew that before. I spent a few weeks geting my btcd node up. Of course, I saved the datadir, so now it only takes me two days to transfer it to another node with txindex=1 (and addrindex=0) from bittorrent 5B7C5B8E1E7FF9FD89D800A59311A17C12707170 torrent 14:31 < Ulmo2> That was on mainnet 14:31 < Ulmo2> It took me only one night to get testnet up on btcd, so much different 14:32 < Osso> I got a new problem today 14:32 < Osso> lncli openchannel --node_key=028e50849ae7a20e012e8136ff0222a39b6a1dde08f6bf17164157d4b752987f79 --local_amt=1000000 14:32 < Osso> [lncli] rpc error: code = Code(185) desc = Unknown chain-hash 000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943 14:32 < dviola> nice, thanks 14:33 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 14:33 <@roasbeef> Osso: that's fine, they're on a diff chain 14:35 < Osso> uh I can have a peer on a different chain 14:35 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qzmdojsgrjkzyekp] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 14:42 < Ulmo2> TestNet3 has Genesis Hash 000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943, and Packet Magic 0x0b110907. 14:44 < Ulmo2> Osso, what is output of command lncli getinfo |grep block_hash? 14:44 < Ulmo2> Mine is: 14:44 < Ulmo2> "block_hash": "0000000049760c723a27f53383ec0974153cc7e630e110f15a96b4948c54c954", 14:44 < Ulmo2> And can be found at https://live.blockcypher.com/btc-testnet/block/0000000049760c723a27f53383ec0974153cc7e630e110f15a96b4948c54c954/ which is part of testnet 14:44 < Ulmo2> *testnet3 14:46 < Ulmo2> Oh wait, the PEER is on a different chain, right. I see. 14:46 * Ulmo2 feels dumber every decade 14:57 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] Roasbeef closed pull request #702: Update install instructions to provide a sample bitcoin.conf (master...feature/add-bitcoind-conf-to-install-docs) https://git.io/vNQFF 15:03 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 15:03 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #lnd 15:16 < mlz> :thumbsup: thanks, roasbeef! 15:17 <@roasbeef> yeh seems a lot of peeps didn't ensure they would emit block notifications, so they would see things like channels not being detectred as open,e tc 15:26 < Ulmo2> roasbeef, since I haven't even read the BOLT spec yet, I didn't want to ask this question until after it so I had an idea of how to ask it propertly, but I'm starting to realize as the days and weekends go by, I may never get there, so here goes: Will lnd recover well from a crash state, such as start from a known good state of channels it cares about, then review the blockchain for new status, as well as review what is going on within channel 15:27 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-erwucgxqnosdsngp] has joined #lnd 15:34 < Lairem> Thanks 15:44 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 15:45 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 15:46 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #lnd 15:59 -!- nirved [~nirved@2a02:8071:b58a:3c00:a8f5:b3a8:c4c1:7a80] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 16:14 -!- kunla [~kunla@bl10-85-39.dsl.telepac.pt] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 16:23 -!- ChunkyPuffs [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has joined #lnd 16:45 -!- tenev [~tenev@87-126-41-46.ip.btc-net.bg] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 16:46 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:46 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #lnd 17:03 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has joined #lnd 17:05 -!- ChunkyPuffs [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 17:10 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:10 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #lnd 17:21 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@c-24-4-228-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 17:42 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 17:49 -!- bryan_w [~is@2600:2108:9:8a90:5a69:d114:68b8:dae2] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 17:52 < akihabara> hi gues 17:52 < akihabara> guys 17:52 < akihabara> ive got allllll night tonight!! i have to make it work 17:53 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:53 < Lairem> setting up a ln node? 17:53 < Lairem> I should have mine set up tonight 17:53 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has joined #lnd 17:54 < akihabara> yes 17:54 < akihabara> im stuck at lnd 17:54 < akihabara> linux returns an unknown error 17:54 < akihabara> when i unlock the wallet 17:54 < Lairem> are you new to linux? 17:55 < akihabara> no, but i am not very experienced user. any help would be apreciated 18:03 -!- bryan_w [~is@2600:2108:9:8a90:f3b8:cb41:7595:463f] has joined #lnd 18:09 < mlz> akihabara, do you know how to reinstall bitcoind? 18:10 < akihabara> mlz i can remove it 18:10 < akihabara> and install it again 18:10 < mlz> you are on a VPS with a terminal screen and no GUI, correct? 18:10 < akihabara> sudo apt-get remove bitcoind 18:10 < akihabara> yes just putty ssh 18:14 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] Roasbeef pushed 3 new commits to master: https://git.io/vNxPj 18:14 -github-lnd:#lnd- lnd/master bb17429 Olaoluwa Osuntokun: lnd: remove redundant server shutdown for REST wallet unlock... 18:14 -github-lnd:#lnd- lnd/master 71a8376 Olaoluwa Osuntokun: funding: on startup only re-create funding barriers if channel is pending... 18:14 -github-lnd:#lnd- lnd/master 30dbbd6 Olaoluwa Osuntokun: funding+htlcswitch: dynamically update short chan id of existing link... 18:19 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 18:21 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #lnd 18:23 -!- go1111111 [go1111111@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/go1111111] has joined #lnd 18:23 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 18:25 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 18:30 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 19:05 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 19:16 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 19:18 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@c-24-4-228-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #lnd 19:30 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #lnd 19:34 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 19:40 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #lnd 19:50 -!- auser_ [43a95738@gateway/web/freenode/ip.67.169.87.56] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 19:52 < Ulmo2> I skimmed BOLT. It looks like a full week's reading. 19:54 < Ulmo2> Is someone running 51% attack tests on testnet? 19:55 < mlz> no 19:56 < Ulmo2> What's all the orphaning? 19:56 < cryptodechange> Orphaned nodes? 19:57 < cryptodechange> Oh, derp 20:11 < cryptodechange> https://codesuppository.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/psa-please-do-not-use-lightning-network.html 20:41 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 20:44 -!- Osso [~osso@2600:1700:37a0:1068::2] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 20:53 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] merehap opened pull request #728: test: adding unit tests for connectPeer (master...master) https://git.io/vNxSk 21:34 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 21:35 -!- dviola [~diego@unaffiliated/dviola] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1] 22:08 -!- gethh_ [uid264798@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ilcvnujiewwtumqh] has joined #lnd 22:08 -!- ChrisMorrisOrg_ [sid151627@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-bhktbfqszhhhpbdu] has joined #lnd 22:10 -!- iwkse_ [~iwkse@sinusia.com] has joined #lnd 22:10 -!- danielh_ [~danielh@speedtest.sbbs.se] has joined #lnd 22:10 -!- kemyd__ [dawid@136.243.148.21] has joined #lnd 22:11 -!- tweeaks [~tweeeaks@unaffiliated/tweeeaks] has joined #lnd 22:15 -!- gethh_ is now known as gethh 22:15 -!- ChrisMorrisOrg_ is now known as ChrisMorrisOrg 22:16 -!- Netsplit over, joins: sato_vision 22:17 -!- TerminusAlamond4 [~TerminusA@sj0.logicfailed.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 22:19 -!- TerminusAlamond4 [~TerminusA@sj0.logicfailed.com] has joined #lnd 22:19 -!- cryptodechange [~cryptodec@host86-168-228-108.range86-168.btcentralplus.com] has joined #lnd 22:21 -!- rhavar_ [uid237883@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fcaakowuvclojzph] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 22:22 -!- nhill [~nhill@192.241.254.22] has joined #lnd 23:00 -!- Lairem [b968b86b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.185.104.184.107] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 23:23 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 23:46 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-erwucgxqnosdsngp] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]