--- Day changed Sun Feb 04 2018 00:03 -!- Ulmo2 [~ulmo@c-24-4-228-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 00:16 -!- rompert [sid13298@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hakngdcimdzsgyvf] has joined #lnd 00:16 -!- hsmiths [uid95325@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-iwgqkrikrlbgelbk] has joined #lnd 00:47 -!- tenev [~tenev@87.126.41.46] has joined #lnd 01:33 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 01:38 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rmijntuokqphciru] has joined #lnd 01:43 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 01:44 -!- bryan_w [~is@2600:2108:9:8a90:f3b8:cb41:7595:463f] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 01:49 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 01:56 -!- kunla [~kunla@bl4-53-189.dsl.telepac.pt] has joined #lnd 01:57 -!- pioklo [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has joined #lnd 02:41 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 03:22 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 03:31 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 03:34 -!- iv4n [~iv4n@1.47.174.25] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 03:48 -!- nirved [~nirved@2a02:8071:b58a:3c00:a8b8:16f8:d7fd:b330] has joined #lnd 03:52 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 04:11 -!- sovjet [~sovjet@user182.c2.sevnica.kabelnet.net] has joined #lnd 04:26 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 04:33 -!- sovjet [~sovjet@user182.c2.sevnica.kabelnet.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 04:34 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 04:46 -!- MaxSan [~user@86.105.9.67] has joined #lnd 04:54 -!- tenev [~tenev@87.126.41.46] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 04:55 -!- MaxSan [~user@86.105.9.67] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 05:06 -!- MaxSan [~user@86.105.9.67] has joined #lnd 05:06 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #lnd 05:08 -!- MaxSan [~user@86.105.9.67] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 05:35 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 05:53 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rmijntuokqphciru] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 06:06 -!- PaulCapestany [~PaulCapes@ip72-209-228-50.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #lnd 06:26 -!- iv4n [~iv4n@1.46.133.241] has joined #lnd 07:00 -!- jukuli [jrasi@kapsi.fi] has joined #lnd 07:13 -!- grubles [~grubles@unaffiliated/grubles] has joined #lnd 07:19 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #lnd 07:20 -!- tenev [~tenev@78-83-102-210.spectrumnet.bg] has joined #lnd 07:27 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 07:32 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [Client Quit] 07:32 -!- llllllllll [526618a8@gateway/web/freenode/ip.82.102.24.168] has joined #lnd 07:34 < llllllllll> if lightning allows you to not enter an amount on an invoice, why are all the wallets wanting me to enter an amount? 07:37 -!- llllllllll [526618a8@gateway/web/freenode/ip.82.102.24.168] has quit [Client Quit] 07:37 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 07:49 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 08:04 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 08:10 -!- iv4n [~iv4n@1.46.133.241] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 08:23 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 08:23 -!- dermoth [~dermoth@gateway/tor-sasl/dermoth] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 08:24 -!- dermoth [~dermoth@gateway/tor-sasl/dermoth] has joined #lnd 08:24 -!- ChunkyPuffs [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has joined #lnd 08:24 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] stridentbean closed pull request #700: lnrpc: adds active_only flag to listchannels command (master...feature/active-only) https://git.io/vNQyY 08:24 -!- dermoth [~dermoth@gateway/tor-sasl/dermoth] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 08:25 -!- dermoth [~dermoth@gateway/tor-sasl/dermoth] has joined #lnd 08:38 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #lnd 08:56 -!- sh_smith [~sh_smith@cpe-76-174-26-91.socal.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 08:59 -!- sh_smith [~sh_smith@cpe-76-174-26-91.socal.res.rr.com] has joined #lnd 08:59 -!- fra [6d4958da@gateway/web/freenode/ip.109.73.88.218] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 09:08 -github-lnd:#lnd- [lnd] yancyribbens opened pull request #731: remove header from bitcoin conf documentation example (master...docs/fix-bitcoin-conf-instructions) https://git.io/vNptd 09:14 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 09:15 -!- bryan_w [~is@2600:2108:9:8a90:5a69:d114:68b8:dae2] has joined #lnd 09:16 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mrqxtqinezjpglad] has joined #lnd 09:18 -!- sovjet [~sovjet@user182.c2.sevnica.kabelnet.net] has joined #lnd 09:22 -!- Rubeus [uid78442@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-pmgsvsmbgvmcxxfd] has joined #lnd 09:28 -!- iwkse_ is now known as iwkse 09:30 -!- iwkse [~iwkse@sinusia.com] has quit [Changing host] 09:30 -!- iwkse [~iwkse@unaffiliated/iwkse] has joined #lnd 09:33 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 09:38 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 09:41 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [Client Quit] 09:49 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 09:57 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 10:02 -!- Osso [~osso@2600:1700:37a0:1068::2] has joined #lnd 10:10 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 10:17 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 10:23 -!- kunla [~kunla@bl4-53-189.dsl.telepac.pt] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 10:25 -!- kunla [~kunla@bl10-85-39.dsl.telepac.pt] has joined #lnd 10:50 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 10:55 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 11:00 -!- colatkinson [~colatkins@cpe-67-240-56-42.nycap.res.rr.com] has joined #lnd 11:15 -!- colatkinson [~colatkins@cpe-67-240-56-42.nycap.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: colatkinson] 11:22 -!- ChunkyPuffs [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 11:22 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has joined #lnd 11:24 < cryptodechange> Cool, the pending force closed channel has matured, that limbo balance has returned 11:24 < cryptodechange> Unfortunately the unconfirmed balance is still there, I'mma deem it lost 5eva 11:24 < cryptodechange> { "total_balance": "832866", "confirmed_balance": "234344", "unconfirmed_balance": "598522" } 11:25 < cryptodechange> Will archive the lnd data dir just in case it would magically reappear, assuming it would ever be readable when lnd gets it's first public releas 11:26 < cryptodechange> I'll keep an eye on development though, as I'll implement lightning on my store (www.cryptodechange.com) as soon as it's wise to do so 11:38 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 11:45 -!- someone235 [~someone23@unaffiliated/someone235] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 11:51 -!- flavr [b03b10c3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.176.59.16.195] has joined #lnd 11:57 < cryptodechange> [lncli] rpc error: code = Unknown desc = insufficient funds available to construct transaction 11:58 < cryptodechange> A suggestion: return fee needed (sat_per_byte*bytes) in that error message 11:58 < cryptodechange> when using sendcoins, sendtomany 11:58 < cryptodechange> that way it can easily be deducted from amt 12:12 < cryptodechange> maybe sendcoins --getfee 12:13 < cryptodechange> so it doesn't try to send it, just return the fee 12:20 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 12:41 -!- Rubeus [uid78442@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-pmgsvsmbgvmcxxfd] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 12:45 -!- sovjet [~sovjet@user182.c2.sevnica.kabelnet.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 13:03 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #lnd 13:24 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 13:25 -!- flavr [b03b10c3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.176.59.16.195] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 13:31 -!- cryptodechange_ [~cryptodec@host86-141-180-232.range86-141.btcentralplus.com] has joined #lnd 13:32 -!- cryptodechange [~cryptodec@host86-168-228-108.range86-168.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 13:32 -!- cryptodechange_ is now known as cryptodechange 13:41 -!- cryptodechange [~cryptodec@host86-141-180-232.range86-141.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 13:42 -!- cryptodechange [~cryptodec@host86-172-250-93.range86-172.btcentralplus.com] has joined #lnd 13:55 <@roasbeef> hmm what hhappened to testnet? 13:56 < contrapumpkin> what about it? 14:00 <@roasbeef> mega blockstorm re-org it seems 14:02 < contrapumpkin> interesting 14:02 <@roasbeef> like thousands of blocks 14:02 < contrapumpkin> how's that work? someone repointing major hashpower at testnet? 14:03 < grubles> rip testnet LN? 14:05 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mrqxtqinezjpglad] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 14:09 <@roasbeef> contrapumpkin: someone mining with an asic on testnet, for w/e reason 14:10 <@roasbeef> there's a bug in the testnet difficulty calculation 14:10 <@roasbeef> where you can manipulate timestamnps to cause difficult drops to zero 14:10 < contrapumpkin> ah 14:15 -!- tenev [~tenev@78-83-102-210.spectrumnet.bg] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 14:17 -!- colatkinson [~colatkins@cpe-67-240-56-42.nycap.res.rr.com] has joined #lnd 14:23 -!- bryan_w [~is@2600:2108:9:8a90:5a69:d114:68b8:dae2] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 14:25 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 14:46 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 14:47 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has joined #lnd 14:57 -!- nirved [~nirved@2a02:8071:b58a:3c00:a8b8:16f8:d7fd:b330] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 15:18 -!- kunla [~kunla@bl10-85-39.dsl.telepac.pt] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 15:19 -!- anome [~anome@unaffiliated/anome] has quit [] 15:37 < onryo> roasbeef, do I still need to hard code alias? Did not see a commit that has changed. Some guy as work said it had. 15:38 < onryo> Really no big deal but would be a nice perk 15:39 < mlz> onryo, that alias PR was merged weeks ago 15:41 < onryo> mlz, wut? Saw a thingy called setalias a while back but there was a lot of back and forth about about it. Seems it got removed. 15:41 < mlz> that one was changed 15:41 < mlz> all you have to do is run lnd with --alias=yourname or set it in lnd.conf 15:42 < onryo> mlz heh kk. Gonna give it a shot 15:44 < onryo> mlz, thx worked perfectly. 15:45 < mlz> yup, piece of cake 15:50 -!- pioklo [~Pioklo@118-40.echostar.pl] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 15:51 < onryo> Any safe way to update lnd and not loose my test coins? 16:03 < lndbot> close channels, send to a different testnet wallet? 16:03 < lndbot> then you can blow away the directories and start fresh without any worries 16:17 < onryo> yeah guess that would be the safest way. 16:20 < mlz> yup we still have to burn channel.db and .lnd before major updates but soon, hopefully the updates can be backwards compatible 16:26 < onryo> mlz, its all good. Just tried it on my mainnet node. 16:27 < onryo> open'n and close'n channels is really cheap now. 16:33 < blademccool> one day 95% of the on chain tx will just be ln channel stuff. haha 16:33 < blademccool> btw what is "Can't accept connection: chacha20poly1305: message authentication failed" all about? 16:35 < lndbot> I think that means the node trying to talk to your node's message didn't match it's pubkey signature 16:50 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:58 -!- ghost43 [~daer@gateway/tor-sasl/daer] has joined #lnd 16:58 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rwksbwzdenbudfhi] has joined #lnd 16:59 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@p98110-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has joined #lnd 17:11 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:11 < onryo> is there a way to list my lnd address? 17:12 < onryo> addresses* 17:12 < onryo> something like listaddressgroupings 17:12 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has joined #lnd 17:29 -!- django [~wings@s91904421.blix.com] has joined #lnd 17:30 -!- colatkinson [~colatkins@cpe-67-240-56-42.nycap.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: colatkinson] 17:31 < django> If I close my channel will the funds I have left go back to the wallet that sent them to that channels automatically? 17:33 < contrapumpkin> there's no safe way to return to sender in bitcoin 17:33 < contrapumpkin> in general 17:34 < django> contrapumpkin, so how do I get my funds out of the chains to a legacy wallet? 17:34 < contrapumpkin> I don't know how lnd does it, but it must maintain its own wallet so closing a channel probably just sends to a fresh address that it controls, if I were to guess 17:35 < contrapumpkin> (and then it can be sent from there to another traditional bitcoin address) 17:36 < django> yeah it does I would think but how can that wallet send to a traditional wallet. 17:37 < django> I am using btcd as a backend. This is just testnet stuff but I am still wondering 17:37 < django> Dont think I saw that in the tits. 17:37 < django> tuts 17:39 < django> contrapumpkin, so you saying the lnd wallet can actually send directly to a legacy wallet? Have not tried that. 17:40 < contrapumpkin> it looks like lncli has a sendcoins command 17:42 < mlz> django, lncli sendcoins amt 17:43 < django> ncli --help |grep sendcoin 17:43 < django> sry 17:43 < django> yeah see it. Thanks 17:43 < django> mlz is there a way to set the fee when doing that? 17:50 < django> lncli sendcoins --sat_per_byte=20 aaaaaaaaa xxxxxx 17:50 < django> does that work? 17:50 < mlz> yea you can try, im not sure if it works 18:03 < cryptodechange> it worked for me 18:08 -!- arubi_ [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #lnd 18:09 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 18:18 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 18:25 -!- arubi_ [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 18:30 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #lnd 18:43 < B0g4r7> Y'all have probably already seen this, but in case not: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/23/go_math_error_has_potential_to_crock_crypto_software/ 18:43 < B0g4r7> Looks like it got mopped up in go 1.9.3. 18:46 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #lnd 18:52 < django> seems to work with and without the "=" between values. lncli sendcoins --addr 1django1uHwq8gkj6bM3iKMhxuHTde18JG --amt 300000 --sat_per_byte 20 18:52 < django> Or should I use a formate like --amt=300000 18:52 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@p98110-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 18:52 < django> this is just bs tx example 18:56 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@p98110-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has joined #lnd 18:58 < grubles> you don't need --addr at all, i'm pretty sure 18:58 < grubles> nor --addr 18:58 < grubles> i just used: sendcoins --sat_per_byte n
amount 19:23 -!- Giszmo [~leo@pc-204-28-214-201.cm.vtr.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 19:36 < django> grubles, thx! 19:37 < django> If I want to add more funds to a channels that is already open do I need to pay a fee? 19:41 < django> I mean if you just want to top off the amount of funds that are in there. 19:42 < BB-Martino> adding funds that are not there yet means on-chain afaik 19:42 < django> =/ 19:48 -!- an0maly [422658df@gateway/web/freenode/ip.66.38.88.223] has joined #lnd 19:51 < django> is the fee deducted from the amt or is it added? 19:51 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 19:52 < django> say you have 250000 sat. Could you do --sat_per_byte=20 --local_amt=250000 19:52 < django> in core etc you have the option to pick 20:04 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 20:05 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has joined #lnd 20:14 < django> ok it is not deducted. wow 21sat/byte was instantly confirmed right away. What is like 40 cents right? 20:14 < django> Fees 0.00003515 BTC 20:18 -!- Memetic [~ChunkyPuf@gateway/tor-sasl/chunkypuffs] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 20:30 < django> what is "commit_fee" took a good chunk out of joining a channel 20:32 < django> anyway to lower that? 21:01 -!- arowser [~quassel@106.120.101.38] has joined #lnd 21:22 -!- colatkinson [~colatkins@cpe-67-240-56-42.nycap.res.rr.com] has joined #lnd 21:29 -!- Osso [~osso@2600:1700:37a0:1068::2] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 21:29 < onryo> django, I would actually like to know the answer to that too. How is commit_fee calculated and what is the reason for it. 21:31 < onryo> The only info I could find was "commit_fee int64 optional The amount calculated to be paid in fees for the current set of commitment transactions." 21:32 <@roasbeef> cryptodechange: if it was the case that a funding transaction failed to broadcast or something like that, then you can use the dropwtxmgr tool to force a rescan using the keyset 21:33 <@roasbeef> cryptodechange: also yeh have recv'd that req for more control when moving cois 21:35 < django> roasbeef, eer, is that an answer to what we are asking? 21:36 <@roasbeef> commit_fee is the fee onthe commitment transaction 21:36 <@roasbeef> its regulated internally 21:37 <@roasbeef> currently no expose way to adjust it, but we'll be adding for fee control related functionality to the rpc interface 21:37 < django> roasbeef, ok so 2.50 cents is about normal to open a channel? It is a one time fee right? 21:38 <@roasbeef> commit_Fee isn't the fee to open, it's the fee that would be paid if one forcibly exited the channel, the estimation needs a bit of tuning, tho, we'll be siwitchg over to vbyte purely internally soon 21:39 <@roasbeef> if you did a cooperative close, so just signing the multi-sig then you start a fee negotiation that tyupically results in a lower fee 21:42 -!- zaptrem [4a4716aa@gateway/web/freenode/ip.74.71.22.170] has quit [Quit: Page closed] 21:43 < django> roasbeef, right when I opened and funded a channel I noticed that "commit_fee": "28236" was deducted from the "capacity": "250000", so "local_balance": "221764", 21:43 < django> so that normal? 21:44 <@roasbeef> yeh the commit fee is deducated fromt eh total balance in a channel 21:44 < django> one time fee right? 21:49 < django> roasbeef, ah think I see what you mean. Sort of a deposit in case somebody forcibly exits the channel. Is the fee refunded if the channel is closed correctly? 21:51 < mlz> 28236 sat for a tx fee isn't that high though 21:54 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@p98110-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 21:55 < mlz> for each channel you open, you have a one time opening tx fee and a one time closing tx fee, those are fees like what you have to pay for any normal txs on chain 21:55 < django> mlz I paid 31 cents on mainnet for the tx. Cost only 0.00003515 BTC 21:55 < mlz> then during the time you have the channel you can make multiple txs with very low fees or no fee 21:56 < mlz> django, sure, if you only make a few txs a year and onchain fees are cheap, you don't need LN 21:57 < mlz> it's very difficult to predict fee estimation, even for bitcoin core right now 21:57 < django> mlz, yeah I just paid 20sat/byte. Very cheap. 21:58 < mlz> right, for now, but a few weeks ago, everybody was bloody screaming about fees like the world was about to end 21:58 < django> mlz, I thought that was the fee to open the channel? 21:58 -!- bryan_w [~is@2600:2108:9:8a90:5a69:d114:68b8:dae2] has joined #lnd 21:58 < django> mlz, is there a lightning fee too? 21:59 < mlz> to get on LN you have to make an onchain tx, just like any normal onchain tx 21:59 < mlz> like you have to make a tx anyway 21:59 < mlz> then you open a channel with someone on LN because you plan to have a lot of txs 21:59 < Veggen> I guess fees will trend down to what is needed to cover channel openings/closings over time. 22:00 < mlz> django, but if you only need to make ONE tx, you don't need LN 22:00 < django> mlz, that one tx was to fund channel. Gonna buy some stuff with it now 22:01 < mlz> django, and while you're on LN, when you need to route a payment, you have to pay a fee, like 1 sat 22:01 < mlz> although clightning and eclair might charge more than 1 sat if you happen to route thru their nodes 22:02 < django> mlz, so that fee is just a one time thing to open the channel. 22:02 < mlz> you still don't understand that in order to open a channel you have to make an ON-CHAIN tx? 22:02 < django> https://blockchain.info/tx/90871d44efe6b5b3ee08dac3d78e3b8c55b71c4d333275f00e9ae93a26094c9c 22:02 < django> yeah cost 31 cents 22:03 < django> but then there was a commit_fee from lnd that cost 2.5usd 22:04 < mlz> you still don't understand what roasbeef said? 22:04 < django> anything that is done on chain will cost since the miners want some 22:05 < mlz> commit_Fee isn't the fee to open, it's the fee that would be paid if one forcibly exited the channel, the estimation needs a bit of tuning, tho, we'll be siwitchg over to vbyte purely internally soon 22:05 < mlz> if you did a cooperative close, so just signing the multi-sig then you start a fee negotiation that tyupically results in a lower fee 22:07 < django> mlz, what would the best way to join a channel be? 22:07 < django> mlz, I did - openchannel --node_key=02f6725f9c1c40333b67faea92fd211c183050f28df32cac3f9d69685fe9665432 --sat_per_byte=20 --local_amt=250000 22:15 < mlz> im wondering where did all the txs go, the chain was filled with outrageous high fees and stuck txs couple weeks ago 22:16 < mlz> wow.. getmempoolinfo: "size": 5099, 22:16 -!- colatkinson [~colatkins@cpe-67-240-56-42.nycap.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: colatkinson] 22:18 < mlz> wtf.. ~$ bitcoin-cli estimatesmartfee 6 22:18 < mlz> "feerate": 0.00157296, 22:18 < mlz> bitcoin core still can't get fee estimation right 22:25 < django> mlz, yeah makes you really wonder if bitcoin was being intentionally spammed. 22:25 < django> mlz, that on-chain fee of 31 cents was confirmed in 3 min. 22:26 < django> mlz, so for 5 bucks you could open 15 channels ! 22:35 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has joined #lnd 22:46 -!- melvster [~melvin@ip-86-49-18-198.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 22:59 -!- dabura667 [~dabura667@p98110-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has joined #lnd 23:15 -!- Styil [Styil@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/styil] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 23:23 -!- maret [~maret@ip-88-212-28-50.antik.sk] has joined #lnd 23:23 -!- an0maly [422658df@gateway/web/freenode/ip.66.38.88.223] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 23:26 -!- meteo [~meteo@52.201.229.182] has joined #lnd 23:38 -!- meshcollider [uid246294@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rwksbwzdenbudfhi] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 23:52 -!- dionysus69 [~Thunderbi@unaffiliated/dionysus69] has joined #lnd