--- Day changed Mon Aug 11 2008 20:24 -!- fenn [n=pz@adsl-76-248-71-36.dsl.bltnin.sbcglobal.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 20:24 -!- Topic for #hplusroadmap: Semi-intro http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXKbzbeipmI http://diybio.org/ http://openwetware.org/ | diy bio tools: http://biohack.sf.net/ | Automated societal knowledge (put it to work): http://heybryan.org/exp.html | Channel wiki: http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/ | F/OSS re: Kurzweil: http://heybryan.org/fernhout/ 20:24 -!- Topic set by kanzur1 [] [Mon Aug 11 14:37:25 2008] 20:24 [Users #hplusroadmap] 20:24 [ bkero ] [ fenn ] [ jm|earth] [ kanzure_] [ Overand] [ wrldpc] 20:24 [ elias`] [ freer] [ kanzure ] [ nsh ] [ procto ] [ ybit ] 20:24 -!- Irssi: #hplusroadmap: Total of 12 nicks [0 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 12 normal] 20:24 -!- [freenode-info] channel trolls and no channel staff around to help? please check with freenode support: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#gettinghelp 20:24 -!- Channel #hplusroadmap created Sat Mar 22 15:44:12 2008 20:25 -!- Irssi: Join to #hplusroadmap was synced in 23 secs 21:06 < fenn> oblivierra seems like a half-cooked "millenial project" (LUF) 21:07 < bkero> Does it even have a domain anymore? 21:08 < fenn> uh, i mean the atacama desert colony, not the mmorpg 21:09 < bkero> I see. 21:10 < fenn> i'm reading logs from a couple days ago 21:10 < bkero> Google fails me. 21:10 < fenn> http://heybryan.org/chats/chats/agaboogamonger_Mar5th02005.html 21:10 < fenn> probably not all that interesting 21:11 < fenn> one problem with these self-sufficiency projects is they always consider the 'unit' to be geographically located, but the real world provides different environments that are conducive to different activities 21:12 < fenn> and so humanity has ended up with trade 21:12 < kanzure> plastic from silicon or something silly like that 21:12 < kanzure> actually it was from algae IIRC 21:12 < fenn> nothing wrong with that, but you have to consider the reasons behind it 21:13 < fenn> is it worth trying to make your own plastics? 21:13 < fenn> what is the cost in freedom vs the cost in labor 21:13 < bkero> Depends on what your goal of civilization is 21:13 < fenn> (freedom from mail order catalogs and UPS) 21:13 < bkero> If you're content with an agrarian society I'm sure it's not too difficult if you chose the right location. 21:14 < fenn> right now the US is finally taking a look at this sort of question re: oil 21:15 < bkero> The extreme left responds to "We're fucked" reports. Everyone else tends to ignore them. 21:16 < bkero> Until it starts to very quickly change the country to third world status. ;) 21:16 < fenn> even george W bush says the US needs to break its dependence from foriegn oil, so i wouldnt say it's the extreme left 21:16 < bkero> Then everyone else tries to find some other reason for it happening, because "We told you so" is too embarrasing. 21:17 * kanzure glances at the screen to his immediate left ... still scrolling with papers. 21:17 < kanzure> :)) 21:19 < bkero> "We have a problem with our dependency on foreign oil. Clearly the problem isn't with our land yachts and lack of foresight retarding environmental regulation and > 6000lb vehicle 80% tax treaks. It has to do with everyone else in the world using more, not us. This problem has not existed until now, everyone else was just waving flag for the wrong culprit." 21:20 < kanzure> if I was more energetic at the moment I'd go into a spiell about recursive publics and fully surveying available resources before exponentially cancering yourself 21:21 * bkero is using no oil besides what it takes for my good to get to the grocery store 21:21 < kanzure> doesn't matter ... dependency loops. 21:21 < fenn> if i could, i would.. that's why i'm joining the raelians to get the first shot at cloning! :) 21:21 < bkero> Yup 21:21 < kanzure> dependency-loops, not a statement that they do loop (of course they do, but no) 21:22 < kanzure> we've been able to clone for a while though 21:22 < kanzure> so why join them? 21:22 < fenn> who's we? 21:22 * bkero bicycles and drives an electric car. :) 21:22 < fenn> afaict even the raelians havent cloned anyone 21:22 < kanzure> we = everybody but me, in a lab 21:22 < kanzure> ah, well, people 21:22 < kanzure> ok 21:23 < kanzure> I'm assuming the SCNT diff between hu/sheep/ape is minimal 21:23 < kanzure> the technique has to be roughly the same 21:23 < kanzure> except perhaps chemical prep work 21:23 < fenn> has anyone succeeded in cloning sheep/ape that isnt all old and fucked up? 21:24 < kanzure> http://home.cfl.rr.com/chaosdriven/references.html 21:24 < kanzure> hm 21:24 < kanzure> mice? 21:24 < bkero> Least fucked up big cloned thing I've seen was probably a frog back in the 70s. 21:25 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/transhuman/cloning/ 21:25 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/transhuman/cloning/RefSalSCNT.zip 21:25 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/transhuman/cloning/CRi%20SCNT%20Full%20Protocol%20Final.pdf 21:25 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/transhuman/cloning/Enucleation%20Rhesus%20Monkey%20MPEG4v2.avi 21:25 < kanzure> etc. 21:25 < fenn> but.. are they viable? 21:25 < fenn> dolly was as "old" as the original sheep 21:25 < kanzure> check out the zip file 21:26 < kanzure> lots of awesome references with links to pubmedcentral 21:26 < kanzure> the dolly problem was largely because of tolemerase 21:27 < kanzure> 'Cloned creatures are cloned from diploid cells (2n) and when they divide (those diploid cells) they produce an organism exactly like the cells that they came from. In order to produce Dolly the sheep, it took over 4000 individual nuclear replacements of the cell - 21:27 < kanzure> to get them all to divide the same. Insert references to the Alien movies. Don't see Alien versus Predator - horrible. The problem with cloning is that it is a very inexact science. In order to get one good Dolly sheep it takes many thousands of attempts.' 21:27 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/school/Biology/notes/output.html 21:27 < kanzure> 'Cholesterol-based hormones (steroid hormones) are rapidly absorbed in muscle cells and many other cells. The positive effect is that they turn on genes for proteins to be built, but the problem is that it wears out the division mechanisms like with Dolly that caused increased aging rate.' 21:28 < fenn> sometimes you really do behave like a HMM robot 21:29 < kanzure> Dolly related: 21:29 < kanzure> http://www.mblwhoilibrary.org/services/lecture_series/campbell/bibliography.html 21:29 < kanzure> http://www.ncseonline.org/nle/crsreports/03Apr/RL31211.pdf 21:29 < kanzure> Who to blame for Dolly: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/biosciences/anphy/lookup/lookup_role.php?id=NjA0MjI0&page_var=publications&pubs=all&unit_id= 21:29 < kanzure> (his email address and such) 21:29 < kanzure> Wasn't there that dog cloning organization from the early 90s? 21:30 < kanzure> Some rich guy's dog was going to die, so he hired a team of 10 men to clone the bitch. 21:30 < kanzure> quite literally. 21:30 < bkero> haha 21:30 < bkero> There are a lot of businesses out there that preserve dogs DNA to be cloned when it's economically viable. 21:30 < fenn> can i get my dog's brain frozen? 21:31 < kanzure> there was an article on this in the toolkit 21:31 < bkero> It's not the freezing that kills the cells, it's the thawing out :P 21:31 < kanzure> oh, wait 21:31 < kanzure> no 21:31 < fenn> uh, no it's the freezing 21:31 < kanzure> omg omg omg 21:31 < bkero> o? 21:31 < fenn> it's the crystals, man! 21:31 < fenn> oooo 21:31 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/docs/cache-index.txt 21:31 < kanzure> Bioelectric discharges of isolated cat brain after revival from seven years of frozen storage.pdf 21:31 < kanzure> ok, found it 21:31 * kanzure feels better. 21:33 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/Bioelectric%20discharges%20of%20isolated%20cat%20brain%20after%20revival%20from%20years%20of%20frozen%20storage.pdf 21:33 < bkero> SCIENCE! 21:33 < kanzure> :) 21:34 < kanzure> hm, pdx.edu 21:34 < kanzure> that's where nchaimov is 21:34 < kanzure> why isn't he in here? 21:34 < kanzure> oh, heh. he's the one who retrieved the file for me. :) 21:35 * bkero is in portland too 21:39 * kanzure is more worried about the artificial wombs .. cloning seems ok so far, but these damn tanks seem to mutate the cargo 21:40 < bkero> Why not just use real wombs? 21:40 < bkero> Seems optimal for nutrient delivery. :P 21:40 < kanzure> bkero: Suppose you were using a von Neumann probe and flying across the galaxy. 21:40 < kanzure> Assume cryonics isn't working out too well (oops) 21:40 < kanzure> you'd have to have live supplies of women and their "real" wombs 21:41 < fenn> artificial womb needs an artificial heart, glandular system, kidneys, etc etc 21:41 < kanzure> as if the fact that it's attached to women makes them any more real, except in that we currently have them I suppose 21:41 < kanzure> artificial womb is just a tank sort of 21:41 < kanzure> let me get the Kuwabara refs 21:41 < kanzure> close but not it: http://www.uni.edu/~maclino/cl/skinner_baby_in_a_box.pdf 21:41 < kanzure> http://www.amazon.com/Ectogenesis-Artificial-Technology-Reproduction-Inquiry/dp/9042020814 21:41 < fenn> they dont have to be 'real' kidneys, just something that performs the same function. but kidneys seem like an efficient use of space and energy to me 21:41 < bkero> fenn: You merely need to produce the outputs of those. :P 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13418180.400-japanese-pioneers-raise-kid-in-rubber-womb-.html 21:42 < kanzure> there we go 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.amazon.com/Ectogenesis-Artificial-Technology-Reproduction-Inquiry/dp/9042020814 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.babytron.com/ 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.geocities.com/placenta_rb/Biblio.html 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/22/neggs122.xml 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.aec.at/festival2000/texte/nobuya_unno_e.htm 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.mindfully.org/Technology/2005/Faking-Babies-Reproduction19may05.htm 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.eshre.com/CM.NET.WebUI/CM.NET.webUI.SCPR/SCPRfunctiondetail.aspx?confID=05000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000029&sesID=05000000-0000-0000-0000-000000002074&absID=07000000-0000-0000-0000-000000014605 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19526146.200&feedId=online-news_rss20 21:42 < kanzure> for bonus points, the second one is the raelians :) 21:42 < kanzure> (babytron) 21:42 < kanzure> More: http://www.nrlc.org/Killing_Embryos/ArtificialWombs.html 21:42 < kanzure> http://www.fictionwise.com/ebooks/eBook1011.htm 21:43 < fenn> i find it curious that the only people publically advocating human cloning are UFO kooks 21:43 < fenn> why is this a taboo? 21:43 < kanzure> hm 21:43 < bkero> Can't we just have organ sacs for the purpose of feeding the fetus? 21:43 < kanzure> bkero: What? 21:44 < bkero> Autonomous sacs of organs for an artificial womb. :P 21:44 < kanzure> fenn: maybe it's because nobody has actually seriously proposed some projects or something ... something nonprofit would be needed methinks 21:44 < kanzure> bkero: Maybe. There's the tissue engineers that we could go abduct and have them make those 'sacs' you're talking about. 21:45 < bkero> fenn: It's taboo because it raises all sorts of ethical questions by people who don't understand science, but question what kind of rights it should have, and if it has a 'soul'. 21:45 < kanzure> I've always wanted to try 'exploded organism emulation' via having mostly biological components except separated by long distances with networking hardware of some sort or another in between, just so that it could all be modular and stuff. ;-) 21:45 < kanzure> why are 'rights' even a question ? 21:45 < kanzure> is that the right question to be asking? 21:45 < fenn> why would DNA makeup have anything to do with whether it has a soul? 21:45 < bkero> Could I clone myself for a housemaid? 21:45 < kanzure> I dunno, could you ? 21:45 < fenn> your clone would grow up just like any other baby 21:45 < kanzure> wrong question ;-) 21:46 < fenn> you can name your kid 'ben' but that doesnt make him the same as you 21:46 < kanzure> hint of angst there ? 21:46 < bkero> True, but could you breed 'subhumans' with less rights? 21:46 < kanzure> there's a scale of rights ? 21:46 < bkero> There used to be. 21:46 < bkero> And there still is in a portion of the world. 21:47 < kanzure> And how do you map genome to this scale ? 21:47 < fenn> they already did that in america in the 1800's 21:47 < fenn> no cloning needed 21:47 < kanzure> I don't know what 'subhuman' means :-/ 21:47 < bkero> Subhuman is more of a social distinction than a biological one. 21:48 < bkero> See: Eunechs 21:48 < fenn> what do you call a human with less performance, ie the opposite of transhuman 21:48 < kanzure> "Control, an illusion, and order our comforting lie; Through chaos, from chaos, into chaos we fly." 21:48 < kanzure> human with less performance 21:48 < kanzure> but you see, that's kind of assuming there's a performance thingy 21:48 < kanzure> erm 21:48 < bkero> Could it be a human with less value? 21:48 < kanzure> "better human" and "worse human" just doesn't make sense to me. It's the same reason why GPA doesn't make sense. 21:49 < kanzure> value to *who*? 21:49 < kanzure> It's context-dependent, remember. 21:49 < kanzure> *you're* the one making the value judgment 21:49 < kanzure> (or somebody else yelling at you) 21:49 < fenn> quality of subjective experience? 21:49 < kanzure> ? 21:49 < fenn> say i'm blind and deaf and numb and hate my life, obviously my subjective experience is of a lesser quality 21:49 < fenn> OR IS IT! 21:50 < kanzure> I don't understand. 21:50 < kanzure> are you asking me to tell you that I'd kill you or something ? 21:50 < fenn> i'm slightly undecided, but i think it's OK to argue that lesser subjective experience means that your life is inherently worth less 21:50 < bkero> kanzure: If he were that disfunctional, he would be of little value to society, however his quality as a human could be great. 21:51 < fenn> i dont mean value as in what sort of contributions i can make 21:51 < kanzure> this problem space is confusing and sucks 21:51 * kanzure ignores it. 21:51 < fenn> because eventually we will all be obsoleted by AI 21:51 < bkero> Heh 21:51 < bkero> As soon as singularity bootstraps itself. 21:51 < bkero> I'm waiting it any day now. 21:51 * kanzure points out that we're probably the bootstrappers sort of 21:52 < kanzure> if you looked at exp.html for instance.. it's one of the lazy projects we've been kicking around for a few months 21:52 < fenn> kanzure: i got in an argument with an economist once 21:52 < kanzure> how'd you survive? 21:52 < fenn> er, something like that 21:52 < fenn> not a real economist, just someone who thought he was one 21:53 < fenn> anyway 21:53 < fenn> the argument was about how much your life is worth 21:53 < fenn> he said that you could determine what monetary value the person placed on their life by measuring risks and the amount of money put into reducing those risks 21:54 < bkero> You know you're right that my eyes sort of glazed over when reading that 21:54 < bkero> Er, I'm not entirely sure that's accurate. 21:54 < bkero> That's assuming risk reduction is the primary goal 21:54 < fenn> say you are a thug, with 50% chance of getting killed tomorrow 21:55 * kanzure hates the concept of 'risk' 21:55 < kanzure> procto knows :) 21:55 < fenn> you could buy a gun for $100 that would reduce your risk of dying by 50% 21:55 < kanzure> and probability 21:56 < fenn> you could buy another gun for $1000 that would reduce your risk by 99% 21:56 < fenn> so, assuming you have $1000 and dont buy the fancy gun, you can estimate the value you put on your life at somewhere between $50 and $1000 right? 21:57 < fenn> blah 21:57 < bkero> That's not even fallacious, that's just dumb. 21:58 < fenn> it's dumb because people have an invincibility bias, they dont believe they can die 21:58 < bkero> fenn: I don't know about you, but I'm not going to die. 21:58 < fenn> well, i'm not dead yet am i? 21:58 < bkero> But do you think you will? 21:58 < fenn> i dont know, i'm death-agnostic 21:59 < bkero> http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/aubrey_de_grey_says_we_can_avoid_aging.html 21:59 < fenn> yeah yeahh your're preaching to the choir 21:59 < bkero> :P 21:59 < fenn> anyway the whole point of this was that weiwe should value human life insttrinissically 22:00 < fenn> intrinsically* 22:01 < fenn> but then saying "human life" is sort of arbitrary, so i've generalized it to subjective experience 22:01 < fenn> for all the fuzzy bunnies and whales and dolphins and robots 22:01 < bkero> Although I have to say that in an appropriately welfared society, we wouldn't have to put any surmountable amount of money into life extension. 22:05 < fenn> "I don't worry about the ethical problems. I just want to rescue the fetus where it is impossible to be rescued by present treatment" 22:05 < fenn> sad state of affairs 22:06 < fenn> hey kanzure we could lobby conservative anti-abortionists to develop artificial wombs, the rationale being that unwilling mothers wouldnt have to kill their fetuses 22:07 < bkero> Is the state going to pick up the bill for them? :P 22:08 < kanzure> not bad 22:08 < fenn> no, the rich religious nutjobs would 22:08 * kanzure recently met Aubrey in person :) 22:08 < bkero> You can't get rich religious nutjobs to pay for anything besides their 44,000 sqft creationist museum in kansas. 22:09 < fenn> bkero: then they could see the reality of the cost of bearing a child, and the guilt would be on them for not contributing, see? 22:09 < bkero> Guilting rich republicans, I like it. 22:09 < fenn> "you murderer, sending this innocent fetus to its death!" 22:09 < bkero> Of course they're simply going to claim 'its not a child' 22:09 < fenn> now if only i could figure out how to apply this to space development 22:09 < fenn> but they can't claim it's not a child 22:10 * bkero met burt rutan 3 years ago. :) 22:10 < bkero> fenn: They could claim it's not human because it lacks a soul(somehow) 22:10 < kanzure> who's burt? 22:10 < kanzure> the mothers would argue otherwise 22:10 < fenn> bkero: its not a cloned fetus, just a regular aborted (or would-be aborted) fetus 22:10 < bkero> He designs ultralight aircraft, and spaceshipone 22:10 < fenn> raised in an artificial womb 22:11 < kanzure> bkero: ultralight, like scramjets? http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/Scramjets 22:11 < fenn> not ultralights, homebuilt small airplanes 22:11 < fenn> you need a pilot's license of some sort to fly the *EZ 22:11 < bkero> fenn: I get that, but they could claim that it has neither a nurturing mother or father, it's a humunculous 22:11 < fenn> wtf the whole point of pro-life is that the fetus is worth saving 22:12 < fenn> the mother wants to kill it 22:12 < bkero> My ex girlfriends father has an ultralight in his garage. I helped him cut the styrofoam, vacuum bag it, and assemble it. 22:13 < bkero> We built one of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-EZ 22:14 < fenn> cool, that's my favorite homebuilt design i think 22:14 < bkero> Hehe, it's what john denver died in 22:14 < bkero> Burt Rutan basically wrote ALL the books on experimental aircraft. 22:14 < fenn> yeah i read the report, it was stupid 22:14 < bkero> I'm a member of 2 EAAs. The Electric Auto Association, and the Experimental Aircraft Association 22:17 < kanzure> bkero: I'll be over in 10 hours 22:17 < bkero> The aerodynamics of the Long-EZ are such that it's the same as pushing a 2sqft block through the air 22:17 * kanzure wants to see. 22:17 < bkero> haha 22:18 < bkero> I don't actually own the plane. I'm way too fucking poor. I'm still getting a pilots license. 22:18 < fenn> i have a hard time understanding why planes cost so much 22:18 < fenn> they're very simple 22:19 < bkero> Because they're made of composites, which don't have cheap manufacturing processes. 22:19 < bkero> You can roll steel and stamp aluminum 22:19 < fenn> that's not true, cessna's are made of stamped aluminum and are just as expensive 22:19 < bkero> You have to mold styrofoam then lay fiberglass on both sides of that, then epoxy it, then seal it in a bag, and run a vacuum to remove excess epoxy. 22:20 < bkero> Cessnas also demand a price premium, you pay for their product marketing. 22:20 < bkero> They're also not 'experimental'. 22:20 < fenn> experimental or not, airplanes are expensive 22:21 < bkero> Yea, those long-ez's are $35000 :/ 22:21 < bkero> Because they require a substantial bit of engineering? :P 22:22 < bkero> A piece of shit will roll, but a piece of shit won't fly. That's why engineering on planes is infinitely better than cars. 22:22 < fenn> $35k isnt too bad, that's about what someone would pay for a car 22:22 < bkero> Finished in 1985 22:22 < bkero> Then again, nobody has built substantially better planes since then. :/ 22:22 < bkero> For fuel mileage, the Vari-EZ still holds the record. 22:23 < fenn> but i'm talking to these aero-engineers who make $100k/yr and can't afford to fly 22:23 < bkero> They use fucking air-cooled Beetle engines. 22:23 < bkero> (and get better mileage than the beetle) 22:24 * fenn ponders a turbo diesel homebuilt 22:24 < bkero> airplane or car? 22:24 < fenn> airplane 22:24 < fenn> i'm interested in using a turbo diesel as the generator for a serial hybrid car tho 22:25 < bkero> http://www.deltahawkengines.com/journa00.shtml 22:25 < bkero> Already been done 22:25 < fenn> hard to find small high efficiency diesel engines for cheap-ish though 22:25 < bkero> http://www.evxteam.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=25 22:25 < bkero> Not if you tear them out of old VWs. ;) 22:26 < bkero> Electric motors are up to 98% efficient. Gasoline/diesel motors are up to 26% 22:26 * kanzure sleeps 22:26 < fenn> VW engine is too big 22:26 < fenn> big engine == car bullshit 22:26 < fenn> you end up designing the car around the engine 22:26 < bkero> Riding lawn mower? 22:28 < fenn> hmm that "hybrid supercar".. what were they thinking? couldnt afford supercapacitors so they tried to use lead acids instead? 22:28 < bkero> Supercapacitors don't story energy for very long. :/ 22:28 < bkero> They dissapate really fast. 22:29 < fenn> it says their batteries didnt provide enough power 22:29 < bkero> lol 22:29 < procto> kanzure: I don't hate concepts :> though there are concepts that I hate seeing implemented 22:29 < bkero> Lead acid batteries are really good at discharging TONS of amps at once. 22:30 < fenn> but not enough for this supercar, apparently 22:30 < bkero> The only thing that's gotten close is LiFePO3, and that's about 12x as expensive. 22:30 < fenn> what about NiCd? 22:30 < bkero> Nope 22:30 < fenn> seems to me that batteries shouldn't be used for power buffering 22:31 < bkero> NiCads discharge at about 0.75C. That means if it's a 12v 2000mAh battery, it the maximum that it can discharge is 24W 22:31 < bkero> Er, 24 * 0.75 22:31 < bkero> Batteries are used for power storage, capacitors are used for energy storage. 22:32 < bkero> Capacitors discharge on their own significantly faster though. 22:32 < fenn> uh, express that in SI units please 22:32 < fenn> "Batteries are used for power storage, capacitors are used for energy storage." 22:33 < bkero> Capacitors are great at being charged very fast with a lot of electricity. They can also discharge equally quickly, but they don't store it that well. Think of how you're supposed to wait 5 seconds after you shut your computer off to turn it back on. That's the caps discharging themselves. 22:34 < bkero> Batteries are the exact opposite. 22:34 < fenn> that's a resistor across the capacitor terminals dissipating the energy stored in the capacitor, it's a safety feature 22:34 < fenn> the capacitor doesn't have any internal leakage (not nearly as much as a battery anyway) 22:35 < bkero> But if I go and charge a capacitor to however many farads it's going to hold, and measure the wattage in there after 1 second, it's going to be significantly higher than 1 minute. 22:35 < fenn> not true 22:36 < fenn> and your units are all wrong 22:36 < bkero> Which unit? 22:36 < bkero> (s) 22:36 < fenn> if you charge a 1 farad capacitor to 12V it will stay at 12V for a very long time 22:37 < bkero> But if you put a known load on it, it can sustain the load longer if it was just charged 22:38 < fenn> if it was charged recently you mean? 22:38 < bkero> yes 22:38 < fenn> basically you are arguing that the equivalent parallel resistance of a battery is higher than a capacitor 22:39 < fenn> why oh why is this data so hard to find 22:42 * bkero shrugs. I've had this conversation before with people asking about superconductors as a remedy to the problem of charging electric cars. 22:43 < fenn> "The self-discharge of the supercapacitor is substantially higher than that of the electro-chemical battery. Typically, the voltage of the supercapacitor with an organic electrolyte drops from full charge to the 30 percent level in as little as 10 hours. 22:43 < fenn> Other supercapacitors can retain the charged energy longer. With these designs, the capacity drops from full charge to 85 percent in 10 days. In 30 days, the voltage drops to roughly 65 percent and to 40 percent after 60 days." 22:43 < fenn> so, i was wrong. sorry 22:43 < bkero> S'no problem 22:43 < bkero> I'm surprised to see it that high though. 22:43 < bkero> THey'd be really good in electric dragsters. :) 22:44 < bkero> "Look how many amps i can dump!" 22:44 < bkero> I've thought of picking up some supercapacitors, they're about $200 on digikey iirc 22:46 < bkero> 100F 2.7V are $15. 22:46 < bkero> I'd need 14 of them to power my bicycle 22:47 < fenn> ESR is a critical parameter 22:47 < bkero> 10 mOhm 22:48 < bkero> Is that the rate of dischareg? 22:48 < bkero> *discharge 22:48 < bkero> (or internal resistance) 22:48 < fenn> its resistance 22:49 < fenn> hmm that could work 22:53 < bkero> F=(A*sec)/V 22:53 < fenn> at 8kW total you'd dissipate 400W in the capacitor 22:54 < fenn> but 8kW isn't a steady state condition so it's sorta hard to estimate heat sinking requirements 22:54 < bkero> It disappates as heat, and 400w is a shitton of heat 22:54 < fenn> and also you have to consider the thermal conductivity of the insides of the capacitor 22:54 < bkero> 400w would be doable by a really big heat sink. My processor does about 210w 22:55 < fenn> also, you'd only get 20 sec of "thrust" 22:56 < bkero> Which is plenty for a dragster, but not so much a car. :P 22:56 < fenn> ya 22:56 < fenn> but you said bicycle so i assume there's some kind of regenerative braking 22:56 < bkero> Nah, I'm using a cheap motor. 22:56 < bkero> I'm using 2 36v 15Ah batteries, an ebay 750w motor, and a MY1020 750w motor 22:57 < bkero> *ebay controller 22:57 < fenn> then why use supercaps at all? 22:57 < bkero> I hadn't looked into that very much 22:57 < bkero> To put a really fat back tire on the bike and do burnouts 22:57 < bkero> Although supercapacitors would be excellent for taking regenerative braking 22:58 < fenn> well 750W isnt enough to do burnouts :0 22:58 < bkero> Priuses should use it for regen. :/ 22:58 < bkero> It is on a tiny skinny bike tire. 8) 22:58 < bkero> 745 watts = 1 horsepower 22:58 < bkero> 1 horsepower and < 100lbs 22:59 < fenn> i think i've seen remote controlled cars with >1hp 22:59 < bkero> 1 horsepower will get me up to around 22-30mph depending on if it's completely full or half empty 23:00 < bkero> Voltage drop on lead-acid batteries is aboslute shit. 23:00 < fenn> use a boost converter? eh nevermind 23:00 < bkero> I'd like to replace this pack with lithium ion cells, but that's expensive AND NOBODY MAKES BATTERY HOLDERS FOR THEM!!!! 23:01 * bkero ordered a 10 pack of 18650s on ebay last week to replace the ones in his aging iBook. 23:02 < fenn> i just never unplug my laptop 23:02 < bkero> That's pretty bad for the battery. I've ruined 2 in my powerbook that way 23:02 < bkero> If you never unplug it, I'd recommend taking the battery out. 23:03 < fenn> why? 23:03 < bkero> Battery chargers(even smart ones) maintain float voltage on the batteries. 23:03 < bkero> They burn off the top electrolyte 23:08 < bkero> The battery on my macbook is 9 months old, and the battery holds 5091mAh. The battery was originally rated for 5020mAh. 23:08 < bkero> It has 300 load cycles on it 23:09 < fenn> remaining capacity: 299 mAh 23:09 < fenn> it seems to cut that number in half each time i run on battery power 23:09 < fenn> that's "fully charged" 23:10 < bkero> errr 23:10 < bkero> What's 'original capacity'? 23:10 < bkero> / design capacity 23:10 < fenn> i think 2000-3000, not sure how to find out 23:10 < bkero> cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state 23:11 < fenn> present: yes 23:11 < fenn> capacity state: ok 23:11 < fenn> charging state: discharging 23:11 < fenn> present rate: 800 mA 23:11 < fenn> remaining capacity: 299 mAh 23:11 < fenn> present voltage: 12330 mV 23:11 < bkero> Hum, strange. 23:11 < bkero> Look up your model laptop on google. :P 23:11 < bkero> 300mAh is staggeringly bad though. My 2005 iBook is at 72% original capacity, and goes up to 3100mAh. 23:12 < fenn> i'm sorta wondering how it comes up with that number 23:13 < fenn> looks like it was probably 3600mAh 23:13 < bkero> The ACPI controller on your motherboard shows it to the bios 23:16 < fenn> i want a laptop that takes AA batteries, is that so hard 23:16 < bkero> It's entirely doable. 23:17 < bkero> You'd need 16 AAs to get a decent sized laptop battery 23:18 < fenn> that's about the same as what's there now 23:18 < bkero> The Li-ions in there now are 3.7V * 2000mAh 23:18 < bkero> That's what's been used in laptops for the last 5 years or so 23:19 < bkero> AAs can't be recharged that many times. :/ 23:19 < bkero> Sorry, rechargables are 1.2V. You'd need 20 to get a decent sized battery 23:20 < fenn> what do you mean 'decent'? 23:20 < bkero> Would last more than 1.5 hours 23:20 < bkero> At 1.2V you'd need 10 to get up to 12V. Then you have 12V * capacitory of a single cell 23:21 < bkero> Put 2 of those strings in parallel and you have 12V * double the capacity of a single cell 23:21 < fenn> ok, so NiMH AA batteries are like 2600mAh = 3.25hr 23:21 < fenn> at the 800mA which i'm currently using 23:22 < bkero> NiCAD AA's are 650-800mAh 23:22 < fenn> but i dont need nicad 23:22 < bkero> If you use NiMHs you can get them 1300-2850mAh 23:23 < bkero> Good laptops will typically draw around 18W 23:23 < bkero> So if you have 2850mAh * 12V, that's 34.2 Wh 23:23 < fenn> i guess my laptop sucks then because it's using 10W? 23:23 < bkero> Are you sure it's using 10W? 23:23 < fenn> no 23:24 < fenn> that's just what acpi tells me 23:24 < bkero> 10W is pretty good 23:24 < bkero> Then theoretically a single string of the highest capacity AAs you can find would make it last for 10/34.2 hours 23:25 < fenn> uh, what? 23:25 < bkero> Your laptop is consuming 10 watts per hour 23:25 < bkero> If the battery is 34.2 Wh, that's 10/34.2 hours it'll last 23:25 < fenn> 34.2 watt*hr/10watt = 3.42hours 23:25 < bkero> Sorry, yea 23:25 < bkero> Other way around 23:26 < bkero> Hooray checking for feasability. 23:26 < bkero> 4 hours on 10 AA's isn't too bad 23:26 < bkero> My laptop is using 1487mA at 12.371mV 23:27 < bkero> 18.4 watts :/ 23:29 < bkero> 20 AA's would be a nice auxilery battery pack though. :) 23:48 < bkero> What do you think of Human completion?