--- Day changed Wed Apr 15 2009 00:09 -!- PeerInfinity [n=someone@216.36.180.162] has quit [] 00:40 -!- duzt is now known as anthonyl|sleep 00:46 -!- fenn [n=fenn@cpe-72-177-52-180.austin.res.rr.com] has quit ["this computer has been assimilated"] 02:48 < faceface> can you simulate physical systems in cad like in garrysmod? 02:49 < faceface> I remember you guys talking about things on this topic, so I guess the answer is yes, I'm just wondering how quickly you can build physically realistic 'stuff' using things like pythonOCC 02:49 < faceface> and how much more physically realistic it is compared to garrys mod (where there are no gyroscopic effects for example). 03:13 < genehacker> yes faceface 03:14 < genehacker> I believe garry's mod does simulate gyroscopic effects 03:16 < genehacker> just rigid body kinematics 03:17 < genehacker> IE what I'm having a test over 03:32 -!- genehacker [n=chatzill@wireless-128-62-173-190.public.utexas.edu] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)] 05:07 -!- fenn [n=fenn@cpe-72-177-52-180.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 05:19 -!- jm|space [n=jm@p57B9CA8E.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 07:44 -!- samrose [n=samrose@c-24-11-214-181.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 07:48 < kanzure> http://www.sci-mate.org// 07:48 < kanzure> what? 07:49 < kanzure> http://www.sci-mate.org/forum/index.php?topic=22.new#new 07:49 < kanzure> I don't understand why this is novel 08:18 -!- splicer_afk [n=patrik@h8n3c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has quit ["Ex-Chat"] 08:53 < kanzure> uh oh, don't know who to send this email to. there's a certain set of people that I know that expect to be updated when I have something exciting happen, like an interview, except I don't know the bounds of this set any more since it's so large 09:12 < kanzure> what's all this about surface plasmon-enhanced stuff? 10:18 < myelinza1> now that I think about it, zotero is somewhat like my firefox extension that I wrote in 2007 to enable numberpad-scoping of google search results with an autoscroll feature 11:09 -!- jm|afk [n=jm@p57B9F9AB.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 11:17 -!- anthonyl|sleep is now known as anthonyl 11:26 -!- jm|space [n=jm@p57B9CA8E.dip.t-dialin.net] has quit [Success] 11:32 < faceface> kanzure: actually I wanted to set something like scimate up 11:32 < faceface> called 'biobuddy' 11:32 < faceface> in bioinformatics there is a specific bottleneck between biologists and informaticians 11:33 < faceface> often biologists need some very simple informatics, and informatics need some very simple bio 11:33 < faceface> the idea was to partner bio ppl with data with info ppl with algs. 11:33 < faceface> each buddy would result in a pub. 12:28 -!- nsh [n=nsh@host217-43-230-27.range217-43.btcentralplus.com] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 12:31 < kanzure> faceface: that's neat. why would it result in a publication though? says who? 12:31 -!- nsh [n=nsh@host86-141-176-82.range86-141.btcentralplus.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 12:39 -!- xp_prg [n=xp_prg3@208-106-52-115.adsl.dynamic.shocking.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 12:46 < fenn> because the result of anything at all in academia is a paper 12:46 * kanzure turns into a paper 12:46 < fenn> it's like a blog... with references, and a paywall 12:46 < kanzure> fenn: should I try to pick a date for you, me and jonathan cline to meet up? 12:47 < kanzure> I really think it would be better if he figured out how to use irc 12:47 < kanzure> but that doesn't seem to be the case so far.. 12:47 < fenn> i mailed him yesterday about meeting; he said he'd be on campus today 1-6 12:47 < kanzure> oh 12:47 < kanzure> well then. 12:47 < fenn> i said something like 'um, parking, wah! call me i guess' 12:48 < kanzure> there's a small parking lot on the south wall of my building 12:48 < kanzure> you can sometimes get away with parking there if it's not a busy day 12:54 < kanzure> using this: http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/gears/CADgears2/gears.py can you make multiple objects display on the screen? even without the file reading stuff. I seem to be unable to display multiple objects read from a file, and I've been using every debugging trick in the book (passing fake data, using constants instead of reading, etc.) 12:55 * fenn grumbles about yet another script named 'gears.py' 12:55 < kanzure> you better not look at the code. 12:55 < kanzure> it's hideous :( 12:55 < fenn> too late 12:55 < kanzure> *explosions* 12:57 < fenn> int(float())? 12:57 < fenn> you can use a relative path for visualizerOutput.txt 12:58 < fenn> why isnt this in a git repo 12:58 < kanzure> try this one: http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/gears/CADgears2/gears_20090415.py (fixes the stupid int(float())) 12:58 < kanzure> because my git repos always fail 12:58 < fenn> am i supposed to open this from InteractiveViewer? 12:58 < kanzure> yes 12:59 < kanzure> there's an "execute script" option under the 'File' menu 12:59 < fenn> do you have to do export CSF_GraphicShr='' to run InteractiveViewer? 13:00 * kanzure nods 13:00 < kanzure> but you have to set the value. 13:00 < fenn> ok i see some super mario coins 13:00 < kanzure> oh really? how many? 13:00 < fenn> five 13:00 < kanzure> hrm. 13:00 < kanzure> did you do anything to fix it? 13:00 < kanzure> are you using gears_20090415.py ? 13:01 < fenn> and i think there was a rod/cylinder but it disappeared when i rotated 13:01 < kanzure> you probably just visually lost track of it 13:01 < kanzure> ok, /me goes back to the older version to see what's up 13:01 < kanzure> gee, you know, version control would be great here 13:01 < kanzure> oh wait 13:01 * kanzure hunts down the old git notes 13:01 < fenn> no it wasnt a rod, just one of the disks on-end 13:02 < fenn> i have to exit InteractiveViewer to reload it 13:02 < kanzure> supposedly display.EraseAll() should do the trick 13:02 < kanzure> but it never works for me. 13:03 < fenn> i didnt do anything but download visualizerOutput.txt and change the path in the file 13:03 < fenn> didnt download _20090415 13:03 < kanzure> ok, don't bother 13:06 < kanzure> aw. InteractiveViewer crashes upon trying to load that script over here. how did I write it then? 13:06 < kanzure> or, erm, use it before 13:06 < kanzure> oh, it's because the path is relative 13:08 < fenn> it's kind of annoying that python doesn't give you a linenumber mechanism along with the readline() method 13:08 < kanzure> yay display.EraseAll() works now 13:10 < fenn> instead of print "foo" + str(i) + "bar" 13:10 < fenn> print "foo", i, "bar" 13:10 < kanzure> huh. makes sense. I was trying first print "foo" + i 13:11 < kanzure> but + would be the + operator for integers 13:12 < fenn> also i think it's worth defining a Gear object before stuffing all the values into opencascade 13:12 < kanzure> I had that in my glxgears.py thingy. so yeah I'll go back to that soon. 13:12 < fenn> unless you're really comfortable with pythonOCC introspection 13:12 < kanzure> nope 13:12 < fenn> didnt think so 13:12 < fenn> oh, another trick for string formatting is like printf 13:13 < kanzure> I know about printf :) 13:13 < kanzure> I told you this code was bad. 13:13 < fenn> print "foo %i bar" % i 13:13 < fenn> ok 13:13 < fenn> er, %s 13:13 < fenn> %d dammit 13:13 < kanzure> %d 13:13 < fenn> just try every letter until you get it 13:13 < kanzure> :( 13:13 < fenn> sprinkle numbers and decimal points for added effect 13:13 < kanzure> meta-script 13:14 < fenn> hey that's what unit tests are for right :P 13:14 < kanzure> eval() and then arrayofvals = range('a','z') 13:14 < kanzure> (who needs documentation) 13:14 < fenn> actually since it's a string you could do it in normal code (no eval) 13:14 < kanzure> ok, so just assemble \%'s 13:15 < fenn> last night i was working on getting a simple parallel port avr programmer going 13:16 < kanzure> now that display.EraseAll() works, I can make the script a method and just reload it instead of continuously loading a path to the script etc. it's nice when things work. 13:16 < fenn> no matter what i did, nothing worked 13:16 < kanzure> what is the programmer made out of? is this one of the makeshift "plug in some resistors and transistors and hope it works" ? 13:16 < fenn> then at the very end, on a whim i tried the usbtiny programmer i had made earlier which isnt supposed to work on old USB port 13:16 < fenn> and miraculously it works 13:16 < fenn> so now i'm really confused 13:16 < fenn> yeah resistors 13:17 < fenn> i also have a buffered programmer someone made for me a long time ago, but i might have broken it (that's why i was building the simple resistor one) 13:17 < fenn> anyway i can't get a sensible result from the parport 13:17 < fenn> voltages all over the place and i can't seem to get it to change the pin i want 13:18 < fenn> but it changes other pins 13:18 < kanzure> what? pin changing? of the parallel port pins? 13:18 < fenn> maybe i'm looking at the connector wrong? 13:18 < fenn> change of pin state, from on to off 13:19 < fenn> so i'm glad the usbtiny programmer works but i can only find one of them (i know i stole one back from IU robo club before I left) 13:19 < fenn> oh maybe it's in this tub here (usb gadgets) 13:20 < fenn> ah good there it is 13:20 < fenn> now to see if it works 13:21 < fenn> whoever came up with standard A and B connectors is an idiot 13:22 < fenn> oh, right i have to program the programmer first :) 13:22 < kanzure> "I am program, programmer, and that which is programmed." 13:23 < fenn> I AM USBTINY 13:24 < kanzure> treadwell is trying to convince me that the tiny DLP/DMD chip thingies are what I need 13:24 < kanzure> but these things are still expensive.. 13:24 < fenn> are they? i dont know where to actually buy them 13:24 < fenn> nor have i ever actually seen a unit price 13:24 < fenn> you would assume TI would sell them on digikey 13:29 < fenn> all these people talking about <$0.01 RFID tags but i cant find them for <$1 13:31 < kanzure> volume? 13:32 < kanzure> volume unit discounts 13:32 < fenn> $0.50 in qty 5000 13:33 < fenn> maybe that really is the best so far 13:33 < fenn> i just have a hard time believing they'd put a $0.50 RFID tag in just about anything you buy at a retail store 13:37 < fenn> hm printed tags only came out in february 2009? wtf 13:37 < fenn> maybe the little sticker thingies are just resonant circuits, not really RFID 13:41 < kanzure> wtfwtfwtf 13:41 < kanzure> times a million 13:41 < kanzure> http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G15426 13:41 < kanzure> " 13:41 < kanzure> This small size MEMs (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems) assembly made for a blinding output video projection unit. Consists of a .76" x .62" assembly which contains over a million mirrors mounted to a flexible PC cable with tiny gold fingers. Each mirror represents one pixel. We have no info on these however, these were rejected by QC for slight imperfections or scratches. Sold "AS IS" only- No returns. The original cost of these was over $100 each! G15426" 13:41 < kanzure> $23 13:41 < kanzure> erm, $3 13:42 < fenn> yeah good luck interfacing to it 13:42 < kanzure> what's that port interface? is that some standard that I already know? 13:42 < kanzure> heh 13:42 < fenn> i have a bunch of them already; havent we been over this? 13:43 < kanzure> oh, I thought you said you didn't know how to acquire them? 13:43 < fenn> well, ok, perhaps that wasn't 100% perfect way to say it 13:43 < kanzure> "I don't know where to actually but them" 13:44 < fenn> i dont know where to buy them with documentation on how to use it 13:44 < fenn> just finding some datasheets could help in figuring out the interface to these $3 chips tho 13:45 < fenn> i have no idea if there is any standard interface or what 13:45 < kanzure> emil and I are doing a 9 pm monsters-vs-aliens movie. 13:45 < kanzure> at the imax down the street 13:46 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/gears/CADgears2/2009-04-15.png 13:46 < kanzure> guess something must be going right 14:05 < kanzure> "Docs? We're talking Electronic Goldmine here, Bryan! 14:05 < kanzure> I've not run across any yet on Google. Perhaps we could throw this out to the Robot Group? 14:05 < kanzure> As we don't need to create video, we might be able to bootstrap the documentation ourselves. How hard could it be? Let's see...64 pins, 2 states each = 1.8E19 possibilities. You and I could split the job between us, leaving only 9E18 possibilities each." 14:08 < fenn> there's only 25 and i can guess what 4 of them are (power, ground) 14:09 < fenn> this is what they actually look like http://imagebin.org/45615 14:10 < kanzure> hm 14:11 -!- branstrom [n=branstro@c-be1ee055.438-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se] has joined #hplusroadmap 14:11 < kanzure> Hi branstrom. 14:11 < branstrom> Hi kanzure! 14:11 < kanzure> who be? 14:12 < branstrom> Found this channel through WTA - transhumanism.se - http://www.biopunk.org/swedish-transhumanists-t78.html 14:12 < kanzure> Ah, that's unfortunate. I was hoping you were someone else who I just asked to join the channel. :) 14:12 < kanzure> Anyway, welcome. 14:13 < kanzure> we're currently complaining about the lack of DMD documentation 14:13 < kanzure> care to join us? 14:13 < branstrom> I think maybe transhumanism.se should be separated from biopunk.org? 14:13 < branstrom> DMD means what? 14:13 < kanzure> digital mirror device. It's a micromechanical mirror array. 14:13 < fenn> super high resolution in a chip 14:13 < branstrom> Uh, go ahead, I'll listen in... 14:14 < fenn> they are used in digital projectors 14:14 < kanzure> transhumanism.se used to be aleph.se, ran by Anders Sandberg 14:14 < kanzure> but now Anders is some silly philosopher at Oxford 14:14 < fenn> it's long been an idea of mine to turn one into a head mounted display 14:16 < fenn> wtf is a biopunk 14:16 < branstrom> Someone should take hold of it. I could design a static site or a blog 14:17 < branstrom> I'm sure there are people who would help raise it into some remote part of the collective consciousness 14:18 < fenn> branstrom: the more generic and all encompassing you make your organization, the more people will get upset when it turns out not to be what they first imagined 14:18 < fenn> see for example 'world transhumanist association' 14:19 < fenn> 'swedish transhumanist association' is only one step down 14:19 < branstrom> It's pretty narrow already, don't you think? 14:19 < fenn> most transhumanists are highly individualistic and don't like people speaking in their place 14:20 < fenn> especially a do-nothing media-hog organization 14:21 < fenn> especially when all they ever talk about is ethics and laws, things that won't exist in a transhumanist context anyway 14:21 < fenn> but whatever, it's just a domain name 14:21 < branstrom> Hmm, true, but so are humanists, and they're on the rise. As long as you can agree on some principles, I think there's a fair chance you can accomplish something. In addition to being individualistic, I think we also like to be activists? 14:22 < branstrom> And activists have everything to gain by working together toward some common goal... 14:22 < fenn> i don't know what 'activist' means anymore 14:22 < fenn> running around in the street throwing tear gas canisters at riot cops? is that an activist? 14:22 < fenn> writing snarky comments to slashdot, activist? 14:23 < fenn> working on boring but potentially liberating technology; activist? 14:23 < branstrom> Are you so sure we won't have ethics and laws once the ball starts rolling? Maybe they'll just be incredibly more complex? 14:23 < fenn> doing said work at evil corporation/government institution X? 14:24 < fenn> branstrom: of course ethics will still be around; but it's stupid to try to predict what people will be worried about (hint: history has shown that it was never what people predicted) 14:26 < branstrom> People who want to help the technological revolution come sooner rather than later, and want to bring discussion of all the aspects of it out into the public consciousness in some way, that's an activist in this context, I think 14:26 < fenn> most important is to fix many small, easily solveable problems, not worry about grand philosophical dilemmas 14:26 < fenn> little things like, you know, not dying 14:27 < kanzure> why is it that people that think promoting discussion is so noble? 14:27 < branstrom> Except if you focus too much on the “little“ things, maybe the grand stuff floats out of your control and just evolves mindlessly, and we don't want that, do we? 14:27 < kanzure> anyoen worth their salt is already discussing it 14:28 < kanzure> branstrom: if you want to help make transhuman projects a reality, give me a fabrication facility 14:28 < kanzure> not a discussion place 14:28 < fenn> i'm tired of discussion, and i suspect anyone who's been aware of the subject for longer than i have, is also tired of discussion 14:29 < fenn> maybe i'm just tired 14:29 < branstrom> Hm. 14:30 -!- samrose [n=samrose@c-24-11-214-181.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has quit [Connection timed out] 14:30 < branstrom> So what would you do if you had... fabrication facilities? 14:30 < fenn> kanzure: were there usenet groups about these topics in the 80's? 14:31 < kanzure> fenn: there were mailing lists, but yes 14:31 < kanzure> extropy-chat goes back to the 80s, it's where everyone cool used to hang out 14:31 < kanzure> now they're just old farts who don't do anything 14:31 < kanzure> anders, eli, ray, etc. 14:31 < fenn> futurists 14:31 < fenn> not doers 14:31 < branstrom> Just increase everyone's intelligence to make them see the issues more clearly? :) 14:31 < kanzure> wtf is intelligence? 14:31 < fenn> dirty word 14:32 < fenn> just increase everyone's godliness 14:32 < kanzure> nonsense word 14:32 < branstrom> Have you read On Intelligence? 14:32 < kanzure> yes 14:33 < branstrom> Okay. 14:33 < branstrom> Still not clear on what it is? 14:34 < kanzure> he just wrote a bunch of little artificial neural networks 14:34 < kanzure> and came up with some silly HTM theory, which while nice, isn't about intelligence 14:35 < fenn> but kanzure, it's a magic bullet! 14:35 < fenn> it must be the one answer we've always been looking for 14:35 < kanzure> oh really? 14:35 < kanzure> okay branstrom solve all my problems 14:35 < fenn> obviously, because the universe arranges itself around simple elegant mathematical laws 14:35 < branstrom> I have to say I find it increasingly convincing... Read it this autumn 14:35 < kanzure> convincing of what? 14:36 < branstrom> Of course the theory isn't perfect, but no scientific theory starts out with all the pieces put together. It's an incremental process. I think this is a solid theory to start from. 14:37 < kanzure> theory of what? 14:37 < branstrom> And they've got it working, haven't they? 14:37 < branstrom> Intelligence. 14:37 < kanzure> you can't have a theory when you don't define what you're talking about 14:37 < fenn> "It is the ability to make predictions about the future that is the crux of intelligence." is his definition of intelligence 14:37 < kanzure> oh please 14:37 < kanzure> by that standard, if I make something that combinatorially generates text files of all possible sentences, I'll have the smartest thingy in the universe 14:38 < fenn> of course there are numerous counterexamples: music, interpersonal relationships, pattern recognition, abstraction 14:38 * kanzure goes back to his programming 14:39 < fenn> goal-seeking is something we're futzing with right now 14:39 < branstrom> I don't think you've tried to understand it. 14:39 < fenn> running a zillion simulations won't help find the path to the goal 14:39 < fenn> branstrom: you're right; i've had all of 7 minutes to read about it 14:40 < kanzure> branstrom: I don't think you know what I'm saying either. 14:40 < fenn> but i can tell you right now that anyone who tries to squeeze "intelligence" into a tiny little box is going to fail 14:40 < kanzure> what I'm saying is that "intelligence" is a buzzword and it doesn't actually exist- no matter how godly people try to describe themselves 14:41 < branstrom> What godly people? What do you mean by that word? How do they try to describe themselves? 14:41 < kanzure> they say "people are intelligent" 14:41 < kanzure> or "this person is intelligent" 14:41 < branstrom> And what's a “tiny little box“? 14:41 < kanzure> conceptualization 14:42 < branstrom> So what are you saying, that we can't have a unifying theory of intelligence? 14:42 < kanzure> exactly! because it's bogus! 14:42 < branstrom> Please use proper argumentation. 14:43 < kanzure> you can't have a "unifying theory" of something that doesn't exist. 14:43 < fenn> there's no logical proof for the existence/non-existence of intelligence 14:43 < branstrom> So intelligence doesn't exist? But you and me, we're intelligent, no? 14:43 < kanzure> we're what? 14:44 < fenn> what a semantic clusterfuck 14:44 < branstrom> We understand the world around us, don't we? We can make predictions and we possess abstract knowledge about the goings-on in the complex world that we live in? 14:45 < branstrom> Did you really read his book, or did you just read the back cover? 14:45 < kanzure> I read his book. 14:45 < kanzure> I don't see what any of that has to do with whether or not "intelligence" is a true thing. 14:45 < branstrom> Why would we not be intelligent? I don't get it. 14:46 < fenn> hm why don't i have this book yet, do either of you have a pdf? 14:46 < kanzure> yes, one moment. it's somewhere. /me digs 14:46 < branstrom> fenn: I put a torrent on mininova.org last year 14:46 < branstrom> http://www.mininova.org/tor/1625824 14:47 < kanzure> hm, nope, don't have it on the server 14:47 < kanzure> anyway 14:47 < branstrom> Audiobook + PDF. 14:47 < kanzure> it's actually not worth it, the wikipedia article is a good summary of the arguments 14:47 < branstrom> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory-prediction_framework This one? Okay... 14:48 < kanzure> I honestly don't see why you had to change the conversation from "intelligence" to "understanding" and "predictions" etc. etc. 14:48 < kanzure> you're just changing the terminology.. 14:48 < branstrom> Well, please explain your frustration in better detail. 14:48 < kanzure> what? 14:48 < kanzure> you're the one who believes in this magical thingy called "intelligence" :p 14:49 < kanzure> that's why I said "we're what?" 14:49 < kanzure> because you were essentially saying "we're magical" 14:49 < kanzure> and I completely disagree 14:49 < branstrom> I haven't called it magical 14:49 < kanzure> you said "we're intelligent, aren't we?" 14:49 < branstrom> Magic implies undecipherable mystery, which is far from what I mean 14:50 < kanzure> then why do you use the word "intelligence" ? 14:50 < kanzure> or why do you believe in "intelligence" ? 14:50 < branstrom> What word should I use, then? 14:50 < kanzure> for what? 14:50 < branstrom> I don't think we've grown up in the same semantic climate... :) 14:50 < fenn> the point is there's no overarching concept that covers everything 14:50 < kanzure> "what word should I use, then?" what word .. "for what" use are you going to use the word? 14:52 < fenn> ugh.. "real intelligence" vs "artificial intelligence" 14:52 < branstrom> Look, every word is ripe with assumptions supplied by our culture and upbringing and so on 14:52 < kanzure> so what? 14:53 < kanzure> what I am wondering is "for what". you asked me a question: "which word should I use then?" 14:53 < branstrom> We can't really have a conversation if I have to define every word I use. 14:53 < kanzure> that's true 14:53 < kanzure> but it's not like that 14:53 < kanzure> maybe you're not talking about anything? 14:53 < fenn> can't you guys argue about eugenics or something 14:53 < kanzure> hah 14:54 -!- elias` [n=me@unaffiliated/elias/x-342423] has quit [Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)] 14:54 < branstrom> Do you guys watch Fringe? 14:54 < branstrom> :D 14:54 < kanzure> Walter Bishop is based off of me. 14:54 < kanzure> (I'm Bryan Bishop, the real life version of the character) 14:54 < branstrom> Oh! That's... disconcerting. 14:54 < kanzure> :p 14:55 < branstrom> And strangely erotic. 14:55 < kanzure> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Bishop_(Fringe)#Walter_Bishop 14:55 < branstrom> The intelligence conversation is making me tired, we'll continue tomorrow, kay? 14:57 < branstrom> Someone's maliciously edited out the reference to you as the true basis of the character ;) 14:57 < fenn> deletionists 14:57 < kanzure> the scum of the internet 14:57 < kanzure> you'll never find a more rechid hive of scum and vilany 14:58 < branstrom> Spelled “wretched“, fyi 14:58 < branstrom> Who are you guys, anyway? 14:58 < fenn> mad scientist, internet anomaly 14:58 < fenn> something like that 14:59 < branstrom> I'm 22, from Sweden, web programmer + designer. Soon to be Cognitive Science student. 14:59 < fenn> what sort of answer were you looking for? 14:59 < fenn> i'm 26 from indiana, USA, now in austin texas to set up a hacker space. soon to be playing with wearable computers 15:00 < kanzure> i'm 19, from austin texas, employed in a bajillion academic labs and a bajillion startups and am secretly an anomaly of the internet manifesting itself in the form of Ai 15:00 < kanzure> nice to meet you 15:00 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/ 15:01 * fenn kicks fennetic.net 15:01 < fenn> not worth what i paid for it :D 15:01 < kanzure> you paid for it? 15:01 < fenn> no 15:01 < kanzure> ah I see 15:02 -!- elias` [n=me@cs78208074.pp.htv.fi] has joined #hplusroadmap 15:03 < fenn> mendeley resells your email to spammers 15:03 < fenn> oh wait, false alarm 15:03 < fenn> that was some other chem/bio thing i signed up as joe/blow 15:04 < branstrom> Nice to meet you guys, too. 15:04 < kanzure> joe blow? I know that guy. 15:04 < branstrom> Wow, you got a lot going on, kanzure. More than I have, anyhow. 15:05 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/chats/2009-04-14_SingularityHub_interview.html 15:05 < kanzure> that's a recent interview I did, maybe it will help understand what I'm up to? 15:05 < branstrom> Just a Rails programmer in the icier part of Sweden. Right near the edge of the wood. Real quiet. o_o 15:06 < kanzure> rails doesn't make you evil. quite the opposite. 15:08 < branstrom> Thanks, reading 15:10 < fenn> wow newegg sells rice cookers? 15:11 < fenn> you know a rice cooker would make a decent bio reactor 15:12 < fenn> assuming it were properly hacked for precise temperature control 15:16 < branstrom> kanzure: Have you written anything on the non-existence of intelligence, that might be illuminating to someone like me? 15:17 < branstrom> What about “abstraction“? 15:17 < branstrom> You don't think there's an over-arching algorithm to the sensory data processing taking place in our brains? 15:18 < fenn> no 15:18 < branstrom> I'm pretty much going into Cognitive Science because I'm fascinated by the possible consequences of Hawkins' theory. 15:19 < fenn> hence 'emotion' vs 'rational thought' vs 'intuition' 15:20 < branstrom> Hmm, what if I take back “brains“ and replace it with “neocortex“? 15:20 < fenn> argh motherfucking asshats 15:20 < fenn> Thanks for you interest in OpenWetWare! Unfortunately, we have a new policy regarding usernames where we ask you to give 15:20 < branstrom> fenn: alright 15:20 < fenn> your full (publication) names. Please reapply for an account with your full name, and we'll be happy to process the 15:21 < fenn> account quickly. 15:24 < branstrom> fenn: what kind of wearable computers? 15:24 < fenn> the small and unobtrusive kind, with head mounted display and advanced input devices 15:25 < fenn> i.e. not a bar of soap with tiny screen and impossible buttons 15:26 < branstrom> Advanced input devices? 15:26 < branstrom> Still wearable, even though they're “advanced“? 15:26 < fenn> right now the plan is beagleboard, myvu crystal hacked apart to resemble a microoptical, 3D accelerometer, 2D gyro, GPS module, and finger mouse; will be researching eye trackers for look-and-blink interface 15:27 < branstrom> Beagleboard? Myvu? 15:27 < fenn> google 15:28 < branstrom> Yeah, yeah. 15:34 < kanzure> fenn: do you need me to rough up the OWW people? 15:34 < kanzure> an email I just received: "I am not a total n00b--to use the WoW-speak--when it comes to the world of biobacking, transhumanism, etc, but I really want to get into the community to learn more." 15:34 < kanzure> biobacking heh 15:36 < kanzure> how tall can you make a drop of water before it succumbs to gravity effects? 15:39 * fenn mumbles something about naked singularities 15:40 < fenn> call it 2mm 15:40 < fenn> it depends on the surface it's on 15:41 < kanzure> fenn: I'm answering the latest DIYbio post asking about ways to transfer genes into organisms. 15:42 < kanzure> so I'm trying to think of the right word for "take the DNA of the organism, splice in a gene through restriction cuts, then ligate it together and then use " 15:42 < kanzure> uh, and then use the method where you tap into a cell and inject new DNA with a physical giant pointy sharp thingy 15:42 < kanzure> somatic transfer? 15:42 < kanzure> have people done that? 15:43 < branstrom> If I'd have to blink every time I wanted to click, my cornea would probably get a lot of scratches? 15:43 < kanzure> does your cornea get scratched every time you blink? 15:44 < kanzure> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic_cell_nuclear_transfer 15:44 < kanzure> hrm. I don't think people have transferred genomic DNA with SCNT though 15:44 < branstrom> No, maybe it'd work. But wouldn't you get tired eventually? 15:45 < kanzure> branstrom: the mouse was a bad idea. 15:45 < kanzure> I don't like clicking. 15:45 < branstrom> Neither do I, but blinking would be marginally worse. 15:45 < branstrom> I think. 15:45 < kanzure> hum. dunno. at least you sometimes don't realize you're blinking? 15:45 < fenn> why arent there any 'green' notebook drives? this ought to be an obvious marketing gimmick 15:46 < branstrom> Why don't we jump straight to mind control? 15:46 < fenn> branstrom: the look-and-blink interface has a lot of unknowns and will probably change significantly 15:46 < fenn> branstrom: perhaps you should ask the KGB about that 15:47 < kanzure> fenn: gene transfer methods, go! 15:47 < branstrom> BCI, I mean... 15:47 < kanzure> retrovirus, plasmids, SCNT, 15:47 < kanzure> anything else? 15:47 < kanzure> meiosis, mitosis, .. 15:47 < fenn> with two displays, one right, one left, you could only click on the right display if you wink with right eye, etc 15:48 < fenn> people dont generally wink on accident 15:49 < fenn> then you need two eye trackers though, which precludes a simple one-side attachment 15:49 < fenn> i was also considering a 'ear twitch detector' 15:50 < fenn> this would be easy to do, integrated with the glasses and well hidden, but it might get tiring after a while 15:50 -!- cis-action [n=cis-acti@adsl-76-235-67-52.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 15:50 < branstrom> A tongue movement detector thingie might work? 15:50 < fenn> no thanks 15:51 < fenn> there are other face muscles that could be used too 15:51 < fenn> i dont know their names though 15:52 < kanzure> SCNT isn't used as a gene vector? 15:55 -!- branstrom [n=branstro@c-be1ee055.438-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se] has quit ["Leaving..."] 16:02 < fenn> kanzure: do you want that drive back eventually? 16:03 < fenn> my mom is asking what i want for my birthday 16:04 < fenn> trying to reduce the number of if/and/or/else statements :) 16:12 < kanzure> fenn: no, you can have it 16:12 < kanzure> but I still think I'm being stupid by giving that to you instead of something with good stuff loaded on it 16:12 < kanzure> this would be a chance to reduce my SPOFiness 16:12 < fenn> yes 16:13 < fenn> i havent installed it yet 16:15 < kanzure> go ahead and use it for now. I have a few others. 16:15 < kanzure> I must be the laziest person on earth, you've been here for, what, two months? and I still haven't got around to this? 16:17 < kanzure> hey cis-action. 16:18 < kanzure> fenn: any ideas on coloring objects in pythonocc? I think it's the "Quantity" module from occ. 16:19 < kanzure> Quantity.Quantity_Color. but then I'm not sure how to set a color. 16:21 < cis-action> hey guys. 16:21 < fenn> there was an example of coloring 16:22 < kanzure> fenn: test_XDE.py .. but that's not what I want. 16:23 < kanzure> oh, display.DisplayColoredShape(wire.Wire(), 'RED') 16:23 < fenn> yeah 16:23 < kanzure> which of course isn't implemented blah 16:24 < fenn> it's not? i remember seeing screenshots 16:24 < kanzure> well, in BRepFeat_example.py it uses display.DisplayColoredShape(wire.Wire(), 'RED') but there's no display.DisplayColoredShape() in InteractiveViewer.py 16:24 < fenn> ./src/Display/OCCViewer.py: def DisplayColoredShape(self,shape,color): 16:25 < kanzure> not found 16:25 < kanzure> wtf-age 16:25 < kanzure> is "svn up" supposed to work? 16:26 < kanzure> oh, svn up * 16:26 < fenn> OCC.Display.OCCViewer.Viewer3d.DisplayColoredShape 16:26 < kanzure> what am I supposed to do with that? 16:26 < fenn> hell if i know 16:27 < fenn> https://mail.gna.org/public/pythonocc-users/2009-03/msg00101.html 16:28 < fenn> er, i mean https://mail.gna.org/public/pythonocc-users/2009-03/msg00098.html 16:30 < kanzure> guess it's time for me to rebuild pythonocc 16:30 < kanzure> (though I don't know why) 16:33 < kanzure> ack 16:33 < kanzure> "here's a standard protocol for PCR " *wtf* 16:33 < kanzure> it hurts so much :( 16:34 < kanzure> why doesn't anybody understand 16:37 -!- splicer_ [n=patrik@h8n3c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 17:05 < kanzure> why hasn't anybody stolen the NCBI public domain genomes yet? 17:05 < kanzure> see typical "wah, people will copyright or patent something you put into the public domain" arguments 17:05 < kanzure> then point to the public domain genomes 17:17 < fenn> because NCBI provides free hosting 17:27 -!- anthonyl [n=duzt@dsl093-216-054.aus1.dsl.speakeasy.net] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 17:35 < kanzure> fenn: I don't think that's a reasonable retort. 17:36 < fenn> because everyone that wants genome data already knows about NCBI? 17:36 < fenn> answers.com succeeded (i guess) in 'stealing' wikipedia because they have good SEO 17:37 < fenn> you can't really advance a genome, so there's no 'embrace and extend' danger 17:38 < kanzure> huh? evolution? 17:39 < kanzure> hrm 17:39 < kanzure> I see. it's questionable what an "advancement" was 17:39 < fenn> er.. well, the whole concept of patenting a genome doesn't make sense anyway, so the logic is kinda broken 17:39 < kanzure> but if somebody hooked up a magical advancement super magic bullet machine to the genome repo at NCBI, then would they be concerned and take it down? 17:39 < kanzure> I guess. 17:39 < kanzure> it's just an interesting anomaly on the internet 17:40 < fenn> on another planet there might be a torrent of all genome data 17:40 < fenn> but this is earth, where people don't give a shit 17:40 < kanzure> is there any field that studies internet anomalies? astronomers study anomalies in space, but who studies internet anomalies? 17:40 < fenn> snopes? 17:40 < kanzure> heh 17:40 < kanzure> snopes: "nope, bryan isn't an ai. stop asking." 17:47 -!- PeerInfinity [n=someone@216.36.180.162] has joined #hplusroadmap 17:59 -!- drt [n=chatzill@cpe-70-112-223-97.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 17:59 < kanzure> Hello drt. 17:59 < kanzure> yay, is that you david? 18:00 < drt> hello kanzure 18:00 < drt> yep it is i 18:00 < kanzure> fenn: treadwell is here 18:00 < kanzure> we can now proceed to take over the world 18:00 < fenn> yosh. 18:00 < kanzure> drt: earlier today we were complaining about the lack of documentation on DMD's. 18:00 < fenn> engage power to the plasmak cannons 18:01 < drt> kanzure, i've figured it out. if we each buy 4 of those MEMS devices and check a billion per second 18:01 < drt> we could finish in 30 years 18:02 < fenn> partly lack of documentation, partly simple lack of availability to 'normal people' 18:03 < fenn> if it's a component of a $500 projector it can't cost that much per unit 18:03 < drt> so buy one & take it apart 18:04 < fenn> that provides a source of reverse-engineering data, not documentation 18:04 < fenn> i'm concerned the chips they use will be power hogs 18:04 < fenn> not the DLP but the video interface stuff 18:04 < drt> if we just want the end result, we only need to hack the optics 18:05 < fenn> if you guys are doing DNA synthesis, that's much less demanding than wearable displays 18:06 < drt> fire teh lazorz @ the mems. the image part of the circuit doesn't need hacking 18:06 < fenn> so, $500 is ok for DNA synthesizer hardware? 18:07 -!- anthonyl [n=duzt@dsl093-216-054.aus1.dsl.speakeasy.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 18:07 < kanzure> oh, he's right you know 18:07 < kanzure> it would be nice to be able to display images of course 18:07 < fenn> yeah i know 18:07 < kanzure> which is a good reason to just go with giant LCDs 18:07 < kanzure> hrm 18:08 < fenn> you can display images on a DLP in a fairly straightforward way :) 18:08 < kanzure> if you have the documentation. 18:08 < fenn> if you have a whole projector you dont need documentation 18:08 < kanzure> wait, am I thinking of a DMD? or a DLP? 18:08 < kanzure> which one is the micromirror device? 18:08 < fenn> DLP is texas instrument's marketing for DMD's 18:10 < kanzure> which one has pixels for light generation? 18:10 < drt> how big do the pixels need to be? 18:10 < fenn> the smaller the better 18:10 < fenn> you'll run into diffraction soon enough 18:11 < drt> which means... a few microns, then? DVD lazor resolution? 18:11 < fenn> lasers won't fix it 18:12 < fenn> and we don't have cheap UV lasers anyway 18:12 < fenn> there's two optics problems: the size of the focusing lens, and the wavelength of light 18:12 < kanzure> drt: I haven't done the maths yet 18:12 < kanzure> but ideally, you need an array of something like 100x100 18:12 < kanzure> because you're building a strand of DNA at each spot 18:12 < kanzure> and so more => better 18:13 < fenn> 100x100 is pitifully small 18:13 < drt> so a BluRay lazer optic system would be better. 18:14 < drt> it's as good as we'll do for cheap 18:14 < drt> the MEMS devices have a megapixel or so 18:14 < fenn> a spinning disc? 18:15 < fenn> the wavelength is somewhat constrained; it has to be energetic enough to remove the photolabile group but not so much that is blasts the dna into pieces 18:15 < fenn> kanzure: do you know what wavelength they use? 18:15 < drt> no need for spinning disc. expand the beam to fit the entire MEMS array, but focus it so it'll converge on the synthesis 18:16 < kanzure> no. I don't have any wavelength specs for photolithography / DNA synthesis 18:16 < drt> so don't use UV! DNA doesn't like UV. 18:16 < fenn> drt: ok, so you're just using the blu-ray laser? not the lens/carrier 18:16 < drt> sunburn, and all that 18:16 < drt> right. just the laser 18:16 < drt> gotta run... be back in 20 min... 18:18 -!- ybit [n=heath@unaffiliated/ybit] has quit [Connection reset by peer] 18:19 -!- ybit [n=heath@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined #hplusroadmap 18:35 < drt> back 18:37 < kanzure> hey. 18:37 < kanzure> I just wrote a very long email to diybio :( 18:38 < kanzure> hah, nathan asked me for a "brief" description. oops 18:41 < fenn> kanzure you really should try to avoid linux-specific jargon when trying to convince biologists to put things in computer readable formats 18:41 < fenn> it just makes you look like a wingnut 18:42 < drt> Site-specific binding and stretching of DNA molecules at UV-light-patterned aminoterpolymer films 18:42 < drt> Jörg Opitz et al 2004 Nanotechnology 15 717-723 18:42 < kanzure> fenn: can you pick anything out in particular? 18:43 < kanzure> drt: do you need me to get that for you? 18:43 < fenn> In practice, if the 18:43 < fenn> thermocycler ends up with an ethernet connection, then you'd just 18:43 < fenn> dump/cat the file to it, or something, or if it's USB-wired, you 18:43 < fenn> wouldn't send it through /dev/eth0 but rather elsewhere like a mounted 18:43 < fenn> device. 18:43 < kanzure> oh 18:44 < kanzure> yes, that was particularly bad, I agree 18:44 < kanzure> drt: here it is: http://heybryan.org/books/papers/Site-specific%20binding%20and%20stretching%20of%20DNA%20molecules%20at%20UV-light-patterned%20aminoterpolymer%20films.pdf 18:44 -!- samrose [n=samrose@c-24-11-214-181.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 18:44 < kanzure> Hey samrose. 18:44 < drt> try this one instead. it's available online. Thanks, Canada! 18:44 < drt> Jörg Opitz et al 2004 Nanotechnology 15 717-723 18:45 < drt> oops 18:45 < drt> http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/RPAS/rpv?hm=HInit&afpf=v96-281.pdf&journal=cjc&volume=74 18:45 < drt> there 18:45 < kanzure> drt: that link above gives you it. 18:45 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/books/papers/Site-specific%20binding%20and%20stretching%20of%20DNA%20molecules%20at%20UV-light-patterned%20aminoterpolymer%20films.pdf 18:45 < drt> full paper 18:45 < samrose> hey kanzure 18:45 < drt> but it's not about DNA, but it uses the same photolabile leaving group 18:45 < kanzure> drt: I have some papers that you might be interested in about photolabile photochemistry DNA stuff 18:46 < kanzure> you can see them at the top of the list here: 18:46 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/books/papers/?C=M;O=D 18:46 < drt> mkay 18:51 < drt> i'll get right on that ;) 18:55 < kanzure> what? 18:56 < kanzure> I'm so confused. 18:59 < drt> reading your list of references 19:00 < drt> ...reading... 19:01 -!- kanzure- [n=bryan@66.112.232.220] has joined #hplusroadmap 19:03 < xp_prg> kanzure you here? 19:06 < drt> reading the paper from the Affymetrix peeps "Efficiency of light directed synthesis..." 19:06 < drt> i'lll disappear for a few minutes whilst I read this. talk amongst yourselves 19:20 -!- cis-action [n=cis-acti@adsl-76-235-67-52.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has quit [] 19:23 < kanzure-> xp_prg: yes 19:23 < kanzure-> drt: :) hope you like my paper collection 19:24 < kanzure-> drt: if you want, we can physically arrange for you to get a copy of the data. there's over 40 GB of juicy papers. 19:24 < drt> indeed! 19:24 < drt> OOOOOoooo! 19:24 < kanzure-> hehe :) 19:24 < kanzure-> do you have any paper archives? 19:24 < drt> it's like getting a PhD all over again! 19:24 < kanzure-> hah 19:24 < drt> Yep. About 250 pounds of 'em. 19:24 < kanzure-> wait then. 19:24 < fenn> is that a good thing? 19:24 < kanzure-> where then is my phd? 19:25 < fenn> er, the phd i mean 19:25 -!- genehacker [n=chatzill@wireless-128-62-174-161.public.utexas.edu] has joined #hplusroadmap 19:25 * kanzure- demands a phd 19:25 < kanzure-> genehacker: hey 19:25 < genehacker> hey 19:25 < kanzure-> drt: genehacker is the one making a reprap 19:25 < fenn> phd's for everybody! 19:25 < drt> LOL. You haven't suffered enough to have a PhD! 19:25 < genehacker> so you talked to Dr. Pryor 19:25 < kanzure-> genehacker: drt is david treadwell, a materials guy who's been helping out with me 19:25 < kanzure-> genehacker: I talked with pryor a while back, yeah 19:26 < genehacker> and? 19:26 < kanzure-> he offered me a summer job but I didn't take it 19:26 < kanzure-> wait, he is interested in what I'm doing? 19:26 < kanzure-> he didn't seem too interested when I mentioned it to him 19:26 < kanzure-> I mentioned OROCOS to him and he didn't get all excited or anything 19:27 < kanzure-> genehacker: should I send an email to pryor? 19:27 < genehacker> if you want 19:27 < fenn> how is it that you actually talk to professors? when i was a freshman they wouldn't even look at me 19:27 < genehacker> he knew what a fablab was 19:27 < fenn> 'do you have an appointment?' 19:27 < genehacker> there was this event here discussing the science of ironman 19:28 < genehacker> plus this guy is pretty cool 19:28 < kanzure-> wtf, science of ironman 19:28 * kanzure- missed it :( 19:28 < genehacker> damn 19:28 < genehacker> Err, more like engineering of ironman 19:28 < genehacker> you know what? 19:28 -!- splicer_ [n=patrik@h8n3c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)] 19:28 -!- ybit [n=heath@unaffiliated/ybit] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)] 19:28 < kanzure-> cave + iron + man => iron man 19:29 -!- splicer_ [n=patrik@h8n3c1o261.bredband.skanova.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 19:29 < genehacker> dude, didn't you see the posters? 19:29 -!- ybit [n=heath@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined #hplusroadmap 19:29 < drt> everyone wants to talk to Bryan. we're drawn to him like moths to an oxidative plasma 19:29 < genehacker> oxidative plasma? 19:29 < kanzure-> so he knew me? that's good 19:29 < kanzure-> nope 19:29 < genehacker> like a plasmak? 19:30 < genehacker> oh you know what? 19:30 * fenn repeatedly bashes head into monitor 19:30 < kanzure> gah, too much lag. 19:30 < kanzure-> genehacker: so, re: robotic arms + SLS. I have a new project in the automated design lab 19:30 < kanzure> okay, anyway. 19:30 < kanzure> oh. there I go. 19:30 < genehacker> they can design purpose built robotic workcells in about a day now 19:31 < kanzure> basically we get to do SKDB with ADL 19:31 < kanzure> and campbell is thinking of hiring new people over the summer to work on stuff 19:31 < fenn> o rly 19:31 < kanzure> fenn should still show up :) 19:31 < genehacker> pryor's working on a "I can't show you this because the military said I can't" project to make an automatic bomb assembly system 19:32 < kanzure> bah. 19:32 < genehacker> you know they assemble bombs right there on the ship? 19:32 < kanzure> do they manufacture the parts on the ship? 19:32 < genehacker> no 19:32 < genehacker> they put them together 19:32 < fenn> some replacement parts are made with SLS machines 19:32 < genehacker> with a bunch of humans that work 72 hour shifts 19:32 < drt> oooh! a self-replicating bomb! now that's a career without a future! 19:33 < genehacker> what they do is they have like missile bodies and war heads and stuff like that I presume 19:33 < genehacker> speaking of bombs... 19:34 < kanzure> ok sent an email 19:34 < genehacker> http://www.google.com/patents?id=3IApAAAAEBAJ&dq=fluidic+guidance 19:34 < genehacker> to pryor? 19:34 < kanzure> yes 19:34 < genehacker> well I won't be able to talk much, you see I haven't had any sleep 19:35 < genehacker> fluidic guidance of railgun launched missiles 19:35 < genehacker> maybe we could adapt it to make a fluidically guided people seeker 19:36 < kanzure> as fenn said, "you're just interested in it because it has the word fluid in it" 19:36 < genehacker> yeah so? 19:36 < genehacker> it's cool is it not? 19:37 < genehacker> a missile guided by a 4 pixel fluidic camera 19:38 < genehacker> a thermal imaging camera 19:48 < genehacker> http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D97J48IO2.html 19:48 < genehacker> huh? 19:48 < genehacker> well I'm afk 19:51 < drt> ttfn 19:52 < kanzure> pythonocc is broken now? wah. 19:53 < kanzure> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'delete_NISDisplay3d' 20:01 < kanzure> oh, I wasn't root when I installed it 20:01 < kanzure> Neat. I have display.DisplayColoredShape() now. 20:10 < fenn> pics or gtfo 20:11 < fenn> no, i dont really care, i just wanted to say that 20:11 < kanzure> had your fill for the day? 20:19 < fenn> i do wish the 'gears' would look sorta like gears, or at least be in the same plane 20:20 < kanzure> they are supposed to be in the same plane. 20:20 < kanzure> they don't look like gears because I don't know enough about gears to make something that reasonably correctly approximates gears 20:20 < kanzure> my idea though is to let users dump in standard gear CAD files in the future 20:20 < kanzure> so that this program will just position them 20:20 < kanzure> and the detail is a function of *their* laziness instead of mine 20:20 < kanzure> (because I'm a rotten bastard?) 20:20 < fenn> to the core 20:21 < kanzure> so I'm using display.DisplayShape(cylinders[3], 'RED') and when I rotate around, sometimes the surface is yellow, sometimes it's red, sometimes it's white 20:21 < kanzure> as if there's a light source being simulated 20:21 * fenn wonders if cline is ever going to call 20:21 < kanzure> but then in wireframe mode, the outline is always red (never color changing) 20:21 < kanzure> what's up with this? 20:22 < kanzure> fenn: he's never really called me except to say that he's lost or something 20:23 < kanzure> (or lost looking for a space to park) 20:25 * kanzure heads down to the imax and to some food 20:35 < fenn> hmm. having a hard time articulating why i don't like the openwetware 'full name' policy 20:45 -!- samrose [n=samrose@c-24-11-214-181.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 21:08 < fenn> "it's not clear how many people we are losing because they are "freaked out" that people can edit their work under a pseudonym, this number may be larger than the number of people who would be upset about having their real name associated with edits on the site." 21:09 < fenn> i must be missing something 21:10 -!- xp_prg [n=xp_prg3@208-106-52-115.adsl.dynamic.shocking.com] has quit ["This computer has gone to sleep"] 21:20 < kanzure> fenn: the whole point is to let anybody edit 21:20 < kanzure> why would we want to restrict diybio? etc. 21:36 < kanzure> it's very hard to program without documentation 21:36 < kanzure> how do I fix this lighting issue? 21:38 < kanzure> interesting. if I set the color to 'blue' in wireframe mode, and then switch to shaded mode, the 'blue' doesn't actually stick. how weird. 21:38 < kanzure> but then if I go back to wireframe, it's back to blue 21:57 -!- jm|afk [n=jm@p57B9F9AB.dip.t-dialin.net] has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)] 22:09 -!- kanzure- [n=bryan@66.112.232.220] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 22:30 < kanzure> any ideas on fixing this problem? 22:30 < fenn> can you post the script that exhibits the bug? 22:33 < kanzure> http://heybryan.org/~bbishop/docs/scripts/pythonocc-coloring-error.py 22:34 < fenn> weird 22:35 < kanzure> you see it? 22:35 < kanzure> I think XPDE might be what I'm looking for, but I'm scared of it because I have no idea where the documentation is 22:35 < fenn> bah. no readline on the python shell 22:36 < fenn> hm. ctrl+up-arrow 22:36 < kanzure> yes 22:37 < kanzure> I thought you would know that :) 22:37 < kanzure> there is also some arrow navigation with the popup menus, btw 22:40 < fenn> i like wxwidgets because of its strategic value in destroying microsoft, not because it's intrinsically well designed software 22:41 < kanzure> where'd that comment come from 22:41 < fenn> the weird shell interface 22:43 < kanzure> huh? now I'm confused 22:43 < fenn> nevermind 22:43 < kanzure> the shell implements python. 22:43 < fenn> yeah but it has all sorts of extra features that don't work the way you expect 22:48 -!- drt_ [n=chatzill@adsl-71-145-142-46.dsl.austtx.sbcglobal.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 22:52 -!- drt [n=chatzill@cpe-70-112-223-97.austin.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)] 22:52 -!- drt_ is now known as drt 22:53 < kanzure> hey drt 22:53 * kanzure is hanging out with emil tonight 22:53 < drt> aye, kanzure 22:53 -!- cis-action [n=cis-acti@adsl-76-235-67-52.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 22:54 -!- drt is now known as DrTread 22:54 < DrTread> NickServe is unhappy with my use of "drt", so i'm now the more descriptive "DrTread" 22:55 < DrTread> yes, yes, it has capital letters. think of it as shouting my name. 22:57 < fenn> that's totally unprofessional. i demand you use your full name and middle initial, so that others don't feel "freaked out" that an anonymous person could read and respond to their comments 22:57 < kanzure> shouting hurts my dendirtes 22:57 < kanzure> fenn: I don't know if DrTread reads diybio or not 22:57 < kanzure> so he might not get that 22:57 < fenn> probably not 22:57 < DrTread> am so out of teh loopz :( 22:58 < DrTread> i spends to much tymz readn teh lolcatz 22:58 < fenn> DrTread: do you think it's reasonable to require someone to register and post under their full name to an 'open science' wiki? 22:58 < DrTread> Yes. 22:58 < fenn> even if they're not doing 'science' 22:59 < DrTread> so why are they posting to a science wiki? 22:59 < fenn> because some idiot decided to make that the place where development happens 22:59 < DrTread> ah. 23:00 < DrTread> "real" is a funny word in this context. who's doing the checking? 23:01 < fenn> good question, apparently they are too cowardly to use their real name 23:04 -!- cis-action [n=cis-acti@adsl-76-235-67-52.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has quit [] 23:06 < fenn> science is in quotes because it's not really about science anyway, it's about biological engineering 23:09 < DrTread> hmmm. i have friends who post on rather dangerous chemistry bboards using a nick, but their real name is visible 23:09 < fenn> nothing dangerous, this is pretty mundane stuff 23:10 < fenn> part of what's so maddening is i can't think of any solid reasons either for or against 23:10 < kanzure> DrTread: is it the sciencemadness or rougesci forum? 23:10 < DrTread> as long as ur not making aerosolized anthrax 23:10 < DrTread> sciencemadness 23:10 < kanzure> yep :) 23:10 < kanzure> been there, done that 23:10 < DrTread> uh, ok. :) 23:10 < DrTread> first you get a dead sheep 23:10 < DrTread> and some clay... 23:11 < kanzure> hrm 23:11 < fenn> then catapult the dead sheep into a secret bioweapons bunker, and while they're busy with that you sneak in and steal the anthrax! 23:13 < DrTread> LOL "fechez les vacces" as the french kniggits said 23:23 < kanzure> googlestalk: quantified self meetup 23:23 < kanzure> mark carranza 23:23 < kanzure> http://www.kk.org/quantifiedself/ 23:28 -!- jm|afk [n=jm@p57B9F9AB.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 23:31 < kanzure> fenn: I need a scheme to get steve to move down here 23:39 < kanzure> maybe I'll use the XCAF_Doc stuff, though I can't figure out how to display the h_doc object in the interactiveviewer 23:44 -!- PeerInfinity [n=someone@216.36.180.162] has quit [] 23:48 -!- cis-action [n=cis-acti@adsl-76-235-67-52.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has joined #hplusroadmap 23:50 < kanzure> hey cis-action 23:56 < cis-action> hey