--- Log opened Fri Dec 10 00:00:56 2021 01:25 < maaku> how do people have time to read a 50-page blog post by gwern or scott alexander? 01:53 -!- ptrcmd [~ptrcmd@user/ptrcmd] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 02:35 -!- darsie [~darsie@84-113-55-200.cable.dynamic.surfer.at] has joined #hplusroadmap 03:07 -!- Malvolio [~Malvolio@user/malvolio] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 03:28 < fenn> https://hackaday.com/2021/12/09/molding-complex-optics-in-a-completely-fluid-system/ 03:29 < fenn> .title https://www.osapublishing.org/optica/fulltext.cfm?uri=optica-8-11-1501&id=464960 03:29 < saxo> Fabrication of freeform optical components by fluidic shaping 03:29 < fenn> i think you could get more degrees of freedom with applied electric fields to control the wetting angle between the two fluids 03:35 < fenn> these captchas are getting out of hand 03:37 < fenn> as a human, what would you expect to type when presented with this? http://fennetic.net/irc/captcha_optica_wtf.png 03:37 < fenn> if you guessed "OEciA" you would be so, so wrong 03:44 -!- Codaraxis [~Codaraxis@user/codaraxis] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 04:25 -!- spaceangel [~spaceange@ip-78-102-216-202.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #hplusroadmap 05:03 < muurkha> maaku: start at the beginning, read until you reach the end, then stop 05:06 < muurkha> fenn: good point 05:09 < fenn> i guess you're saying "don't read the comments" 05:09 < muurkha> it's optional 05:09 < fenn> which reduces it from 50 pages to 5 pages 05:10 < fenn> .title http://youtu.be/mfAGivG9Koc 05:10 < saxo> Making DIY Lenses with Epoxy - YouTube 05:10 < fenn> lots of very specific information if you actually decide to do this 05:11 < fenn> he needs to add "grog" to his molds 05:21 < fenn> .wik CR-39 05:21 < saxo> "CR-39, or allyl diglycol carbonate (ADC), is a plastic monomer commonly used in the manufacture of eyeglass lenses alongside the other material PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate). / The abbreviation stands for 'Columbia Resin #39', which was the 39th formula of a thermosetting [...]" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CR-39 05:50 < fenn> i wonder why nobody ever does two-part molds, with an inner mold surface of silicone, and an outer rigid backer of, say, plaster 05:51 < fenn> the plaster part has a simpler, non-undercut surface so it's easy to remove from the silicone, and then the silicon peels off the finished part 05:51 < fenn> uses way less silicon so it's not as expensive 05:51 < fenn> silicone* 05:52 < fenn> since the plaster is very rigid it should result in a more accurate surface than a completely flexible mold 06:41 -!- flooded is now known as _flood 06:44 -!- Malvolio [~Malvolio@user/malvolio] has joined #hplusroadmap 07:53 -!- balrog [~balrog@user/balrog] has quit [Quit: Bye] 07:59 -!- balrog [znc@user/balrog] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:00 -!- ptrcmd [~ptrcmd@user/ptrcmd] has joined #hplusroadmap 08:16 -!- spaceangel [~spaceange@ip-78-102-216-202.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 08:25 < superkuh> CR-39 is by far the best material for eyeglasses, imo. Decent refractive index but more importantly it has a fairly high abbe number. 08:28 < kanzure> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29510672 08:28 < L29Ah> tfw Zenni doesn't tell the names of the available materials except polycarbonate that sucks 08:28 < fenn> .t 08:28 < saxo> HN has really embraced our current techno-pessimistic culture, so all the things... | Hacker News 08:29 < fenn> a comment on "Ask HN: Where do you find weird and wonderful future tech nowadays?" 08:29 < superkuh> zenni lenses are okay if you have moderate eyesight. But anything beyond 8 diopter or so and it's not worth trying them. 08:29 < L29Ah> oh, and CR-39 that sucks too but not as much 08:29 < superkuh> Better to go local and get custom spherical curveture and bevels. 08:29 < L29Ah> i went local and was shocked by prices and unavailability of titanium frames with huge lenses 08:32 < L29Ah> grabbed https://www.zennioptical.com/p/mens-halfrim-memory-titanium-aviator-eyeglass-frames/1714?skuId=171412 in the end 08:33 < muurkha> does "memory titanium" mean Nitinol? 08:33 < L29Ah> idk but it is springy as hell 08:33 < superkuh> People with minor vision corrections don't have to worry about chromatic abberation, but it's really the limit on effective glasses for higher prescriptions material-wise. 08:33 < L29Ah> took a lot of effort and some tools to get it bent around my face 08:34 < fenn> superkuh: would it be possible in principle to use mirror optics? 08:34 < superkuh> I can't imagine how. 08:34 < muurkha> three reflectors over each eye 08:34 * darsie has -4 D or so. 08:34 < superkuh> http://eyestilts.com/log04.html 08:34 < superkuh> Tangential. 08:35 < L29Ah> the frame just doesn't care if you fold the lenses together as far as possible, for instance 08:35 < fenn> a convex mirror ring and a secondary mirror over the eye. the secondary could be half-silvered so others can see your eyes 08:35 < muurkha> one that reflects the beam four centimeters to the left, one that reflects it back over the eye, and a third one that redirects it toward the world again 08:38 < fenn> my idea was basically this but with a demagnifying mirror (a convex mirror) instead of a concave mirror https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassegrain_telescope 08:38 < fenn> anyway i suck at optics 08:40 < Malvolio> (see also ##optics for more optics) 08:57 < L29Ah> https://www.cyclingweekly.com/products/are-ford-about-to-reinvent-the-bicycle-derailleur nitinol as electromechanical drive, cute 08:57 < L29Ah> apparently no commercial product yet tho 08:58 < muurkha> why is nitinol so expensive? I mean it's orders of magnitude worse than its component metals 08:59 < muurkha> just because vacuum? 08:59 < L29Ah> because it's a royal PITA to do anything with it 09:00 < L29Ah> or maybe just underdeveloped market? shouldn't differ much from titanium tbh 09:01 < muurkha> it's very different from titanium. I mean I think it has about as much in common with titanium as beryllium copper has with copper 09:31 < Malvolio> gee. how do you sit through a 5 hour podcast? some rather lengthy content is clearly meant for cab drivers and pilots and people who wear comfortable shoes 09:40 < Malvolio> and the types of people who host and attend lectures and podcasts. :x bbl 09:43 < muurkha> .t https://birdsite.xanny.family/mattparlmer/status/1465807303895048192#m 09:43 < saxo> URLError: (title:73) 09:43 < muurkha> .tw 1465807303895048192 09:43 < saxo> Banksian modafinil rationalists vs Buddhist LSD rationalists // Many such cases (@mattparlmer) 09:44 < muurkha> .tw 1465809376942383108 09:44 < saxo> The chad "let's build rockets, reactors, and expert systems so we can get this interstellar colonization project going" vs the virgin "we're not a sex cult, we just hang out in grouphouses in Marin while we wait for not-God to initiate the not-rapture" (@mattparlmer, in reply to tw:1465807556580986885) 12:06 -!- Codaraxis [~Codaraxis@user/codaraxis] has joined #hplusroadmap 14:50 < docl> https://alanse.medium.com/why-is-everyone-so-consistently-wrong-about-launch-assist-systems-d21288084421 14:51 < docl> .title 14:51 < saxo> Why is Everyone so Consistently Wrong about Launch Assist Systems? | by Alan | Medium 14:51 < docl> alan is against tethers, wish he'd gotten a little more into why 15:01 < docl> (for mx transfer purposes, specifically) 15:01 < fenn> before when i said the orbital ring would constantly be cycling tension, i meant in a system where the mass bolts are thrown around by tethers at each station on the ring 15:03 < docl> hmm. what's the min length of a tether that throws and catches stuff at orbital velocity wrt the station? 15:03 < fenn> who is az5_button? 15:03 < docl> that's roko 15:04 < docl> (the roko) 15:04 < fenn> there's no min or max length but the parameters change, (taper ratio, rpm) 15:05 < docl> doesn't it get to more absurd tensile requirements as you get shorter? 15:06 < fenn> i don't remember 15:06 < fenn> the timing issues get worse 15:07 < docl> gonna plug some values in here and see what happens https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/centrifugal-force 15:07 < fenn> a=v^2/r 15:08 < docl> ok so if you have a tenth the length of r, a will be 10x as great 15:09 < fenn> no because v changes 15:09 < fenn> holding v constant, yes 15:10 < fenn> i was thinking rpm would stay the same 15:11 < fenn> a = (rpm * 2pi*r)^2 / r 15:11 < fenn> for funny a units with minutes in them 15:11 < docl> if you're talking about a system with the same orbit, v is constant... you can go to lower v by going further out of course, but it's going to be roughly 8km/s if you're trying to build the system in LEO 15:12 < fenn> what do you mean "the station"? 15:13 < docl> the stationary platforms you want your elevator cable attached to 15:13 < fenn> they should be exchanging masses at far greater than orbital velocity 15:14 < fenn> or it could be enormous masses at slightly greater than orbital velocity, but i've never seen anyone proposing that 15:15 < fenn> anyway let's say 30 km/s 15:18 < docl> for a 100m radius spinning tether with tip moving at 30km/s there's 900k gees 15:19 < fenn> here's an example calculation https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/40748/ 15:19 < fenn> .title 15:19 < saxo> atmosphere - What would be the challenges for a 50 km long tether to the surface of Venus to get recurrent surface samples there? - Space Exploration Stack Exchange 15:21 < fenn> uh maybe a bad example, it's not immediately obvious how to plug acceleration into the equation there 15:23 < fenn> it's past my bedtime and i may be completely useless for the rest of eternity due to external factors 15:23 < fenn> read some of the papers in the wayback machine at tethers.com/...Bibliography.html 15:24 < fenn> there's definitely a taper ratio calculation in there somewhere 15:24 < fenn> gee forces don't really matter for throwing around dumb masses 15:25 < fenn> i agree that's an excessive number of gees, but all the numbers in that equation are silly 15:25 < docl> ok say we have a sling style tether launcher that's 50km long, and they can handle the 1800 gees with tapering, you could throw stuff from tether A to tether B at 30km/s that way with both being at the top of a space elevator, and space these in a polygonal shape around earth with good line of sight... it seems like a really awkward way to do an orbital ring to me but not fundamentally impossible 15:27 < fenn> there's also this "two stage tether" concept which i don't really get 15:27 < fenn> it's a spinning tether with a spinning tether on the end 15:28 < fenn> "two tier tether" 15:28 < fenn> and you can keep going with three tiers and so on 15:28 < fenn> it sounds horribly complicated 18:02 -!- darsie [~darsie@84-113-55-200.cable.dynamic.surfer.at] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 23:01 -!- nmz787 [~nmz787@user/nmz787] has joined #hplusroadmap 23:03 < nmz787> I haz made downpayment on the excavator 23:05 -!- spaceangel [~spaceange@ip-78-102-216-202.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #hplusroadmap 23:39 -!- CryptoDavid [uid14990@id-14990.uxbridge.irccloud.com] has joined #hplusroadmap 23:43 -!- Codaraxis [~Codaraxis@user/codaraxis] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 23:57 -!- hellleshin [~talinck@108-225-123-172.lightspeed.cntmoh.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] --- Log closed Sat Dec 11 00:00:57 2021