2008-06-05.log

--- Day changed Thu Jun 05 2008
kanzurea projection fallacy?00:00
Phreedomwishful thinking/cognitive dissonance00:00
joshcryer1.0 was met, so hah!00:01
joshcryerJust FYI I doubt a RepRap developer, even if he lurked on IRC, would address some of these comments.00:05
Phreedomjoshcryer: why?00:07
joshcryerPhreedom, why waste time arguing with someone on IRC? :)00:08
fennbecause academics never respond to direct, reasonable questions from the general public00:08
fennespecially not on irc00:08
Phreedomfenn: you hate academics ;)00:08
fennit's true, those fuckers never answer my email00:09
fennno polite "i'm too busy to talk to the unwashed masses"00:09
joshcryerThey always answer mine.00:09
joshcryerI recently emailed Robert Sheldon with regards to the Dusty-M2P2 concept he had going.00:10
joshcryerMaybe you fill your emails with useless jargon.00:10
fennmaybe a lot of things, i dont know what the problem is00:10
Phreedomfenn: quit emailing, do something ;)00:12
fennPhreedom: i made some shelves today, they're very pretty (no pics sry)00:13
Phreedomlol00:14
Phreedomthat's gonna help replication :)00:14
fennthen i stacked my prototyping supplies on them00:14
fennPhreedom: hey at least i have a design for a less expensive motor driver00:14
Phreedomlike?00:14
fennuh, this is the overview i guess http://fennetic.net/machines/index.php?motherchip00:15
Phreedomfenn: microstepping driver?00:15
fennno, steppers suck00:15
Phreedom:)00:16
Phreedomso what are you going to use for position feedback?00:16
fennencoder on the motor00:27
Phreedomas usual00:31
Phreedomoh well00:31
Phreedomfenn: do you have any completion timeframes00:31
fennnope00:37
Phreedomfenn: so you aren't actively developing it00:37
Phreedomok00:37
Phreedomanyhow it would be hard for us to cooperate at this particular moment :(00:38
-!- ybit [n=u1@unaffiliated/ybit] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]01:19
-!- wrldpc [n=wrldpc@pool-71-174-89-247.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has joined #hplusroadmap01:45
kanzurefenn: uh02:30
kanzureby the way02:30
kanzureso, as you know, I mentioned that Andy's lab has DOD funding02:30
kanzureas it turns out, the synthetic biology group that I am in, is specifically funded by a grant from DOD02:31
fennwhee02:31
kanzureso02:31
kanzurebasically I have evidence with you and on the site that I've done all of htis already02:31
kanzuretherefore there's no way they can claim it02:31
kanzureand do weird things to me.02:31
fennhmm, guys with guns can take whatever they want02:32
fenn'national interest' and all that02:32
kanzureoh right02:32
fenneminent domain, they'll plow your house over02:32
kanzurefun stuff.02:32
fennto make a toll booth02:32
fennyah, anyway, i think DOD is too clueless to recognize the significance02:32
kanzurebut they are funding it02:33
kanzureoh02:33
kanzurepoint.02:33
kanzurewho knew that a humanitarian project would ultimately be funded by DOD.02:33
fennlots of good stuff has come out of it.. polywell was not DOE but Navy02:34
fennthey're just focused on killing machines, that's all02:34
kanzurehumanitarian killing machines?02:34
fennworks both ways02:34
fenntechnology can do good or bad02:34
fennICBM's gave us the space program (for what its worth)02:35
kanzureeh, what about the original rocketgangbangers ?02:35
fennwho?02:35
kanzuredon't know their names :)02:35
kanzurethe russian, the American, those guys02:35
kanzurepioneers of rocketry stuff02:35
fennvon braun was making toys in his yard until WWII02:36
fennthen he made thousands of V2's02:36
fennsupersonic rockets fifty feet tall02:36
-!- joshcryer [n=g@unaffiliated/joshcryer] has left #hplusroadmap []02:36
kanzureooh.02:36
fennbtw the russian, were you thinking tsiolkovsky?02:37
kanzuredon't know :(02:37
fennits sad, funny, and relevant that nobody believed in rockets until they were demonstrated02:38
kanzureis that so?02:38
fenn"theres nothing to push against" was the general consensus02:39
kanzurebirds are like rockets02:39
kanzureexcept possibly more intelligent?02:39
fennthe objection was against flight in a vacuum02:39
fenner, powered flight02:39
fennblah02:40
kanzurewhat happened to newton02:40
fennwhat happened to freitas02:40
fennor von neumann02:40
kanzuredrexler happened to freitas02:40
kanzuredeath happened to von Neumann.02:40
fenni mean, von neumann had a theory of replicators02:41
fennand now we're stuck with "someone will think of a way"02:41
kanzureI don't know why von Neumann wasn't more ... mechanical. He had his abstract theory, and his von Neumann machine theories, he was even a chemical engineer so I *know* he knew about manufacturing engineering02:41
fennit was too complex to build at the time02:42
kanzuredunno, it's worth a footnote02:42
fenni guess he didnt want to pull a babbage02:42
kanzureheh02:42
kanzureI've been impressed by the old fashion mechanical calculators, the ones that were as large as rooms02:42
kanzurejust to do multiplication :)02:43
fennthe zuse 1 was actually desktop sized02:43
kanzurelike Leibniz's machine, Pascal's, Babbage's logic engine, etc.02:43
kanzureoh?02:43
kanzureI heard it was tin pans in Konrad Zuse's parent's kitchen02:43
fennhttp://www.visionfutur.com/img/histoire/zuse1-2.jpg02:43
fenncost something like a million dollars (2008 dollars)02:44
kanzureimpressive02:44
fenni think it could be scaled down easily02:44
fennthe question is how far02:44
fenner, how far do you want to scale it down02:44
fenni'm skeptical of drexler MNT02:45
fennit's just too far from working everyday experience to say anything about02:45
fennlike people talking about colonizing mars back when they thought there were plants and stuff02:45
kanzureyes02:46
kanzureright now Drexler and Freitas are working on comp chem tools to do simulations and so on02:46
kanzurethey even have nanomanipulators for like, well, hydrogen02:46
kanzureand are slowly building an atomic toolkit of sorst02:46
kanzure*sorts02:46
kanzurebut I haven't seen evidence that they have their heads on straight02:46
kanzurethe fact that they know about comp chem tools is suggestive that they might02:47
kanzureespecialyl re: their molecular assembler desktop machine ideas02:47
kanzureFreitas has good visualization skills, but...02:47
fenn you know the reprap conversation reminds me of that AI researcher talking about building a good theoretical framework first02:51
fennroles reversed02:52
kanzurehm?02:52
kanzureto me it seems like the reprap guys are like the ai guys02:52
kanzurebut the weird thing is that the reprap guys are calling us the ai guys02:52
fennoh the top down bottom up thing?02:52
kanzurenot so much that, but that they think we're just sitting here waiting for ai to come about to solve the problem for us02:53
kanzurewhereas that's what *they* are doing (waiting for somebody to come along to do it)02:53
kanzurewhen you jump the spectrum from linear to parallel, from non-replication to replication, from computational stuff to fabricational stuff, roles and jobs get reversed in weird ways02:54
kanzureso the communication issue is more apparent02:54
kanzureultimately we're both taking what seems to be a more computational approach to it all02:54
kanzureit's obvious too, it's processes02:54
kanzurehrm, anyway, I need to sleep, dream about some protein engineering tactics or something, and then figure out what I'm doing tomorrow02:54
kanzure'night02:54
fennnight02:54
* kanzure wonders if anybody has done any serious protein engineering before02:55
-!- kanzure [n=bryan@cpe-70-113-54-112.austin.res.rr.com] has quit ["Leaving."]02:55
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined #hplusroadmap04:52
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has quit [Remote closed the connection]04:54
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined #hplusroadmap04:57
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]04:58
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined #hplusroadmap04:59
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]05:55
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined #hplusroadmap06:05
nshwhat's this jibbajabba now?06:45
nshit seems i've been slandering some machine06:45
-!- Vedestin [n=Vedestin@d122-109-35-58.sbr3.nsw.optusnet.com.au] has quit ["User pushed the X - because it's Xtra, baby"]09:05
-!- shogunx [n=shogunx@rrcs-24-73-158-97.se.biz.rr.com] has joined #hplusroadmap10:06
-!- kanzure [i=bryan@dhcp-146-6-213-183.icmb.utexas.edu] has joined #hplusroadmap10:37
kanzureHi all.10:43
shogunxkanzure  re previous thread with you and fenn... check freegeek.org10:59
fennportland is the only place in the world that can support something like that11:00
kanzurewhy portland?11:01
kanzureshogunx: looks like a charity?11:01
kanzurehttp://freegeek.org/mission.php11:01
kanzure'REE GEEK is a 501(c)(3) not for profit community organization that recycles used technology to provide computers, education, internet access and job skills training to those in need in exchange for community service.'11:01
shogunxits a recycling lab started in portland11:02
fennkanzure: because people are too jaded/apathetic everywhere else11:02
shogunxorganizing as a non-profit can be very handy.11:02
shogunxfenn, actually, there are other chapters springing up all over the place.11:03
fennhow are they doing?11:03
kanzureshogunx: re: freegek.org, http://freedomofscience.org11:03
shogunxits turning into a very popular idea.11:03
kanzureI'm starting to hate chapter organizations11:03
kanzurediversity sucks, we need unification11:03
shogunxi hear you on that, but this is a good one.11:03
kanzureno, I don't care whether it's good or bad11:03
kanzureeven if it's bad I would still try to show up and help out -- i.e., subtle approach11:04
kanzurehowever11:04
kanzurethere's too many of these chapters11:04
shogunxthey are essentially replicating a known functional model.11:04
kanzurehplusclub, meetup, metalworking, makerfairegroup, dorkbot, geekaustin, indieaustin, atxfutureclub, lab, 11:04
kanzurenono, hold on, let me suggest my alternative11:04
kanzuremy suggestion is to have the /community/ integrate the chapters together11:05
kanzureto serve their needs, so that they can get the same people, who would otherwise be unable to attend all of the chapters, still doing good work11:05
shogunxfreedomofscience looks pretty good... i made the solarnet development pretty open along those lines.11:05
kanzureoh, add NSS and other rocket society chapters to that list11:05
kanzureshogunx: I've been talking with the freedomofscience guys, I want to see what comes of it11:05
kanzurehave you heard of them before ?11:05
kanzureare these guys respectable etc. ?11:05
fennkanzure: most people dont see the connection between i.e. metalworking and computers11:05
shogunxfreedomofscience?  have not heard of them11:05
kanzurethe connection /is/ hard to see11:06
kanzurehow many people know about silicon itself11:06
shogunxfenn  that is the role of genius... to put together the disparate building blocks scattered around society for the greater good.11:06
kanzuremore to the point, how many people know about the fabrication setups that go behind the computers11:06
kanzuregreater good? shogunx, just to make it clear, this all /just so happens/ to have a byproduct that might look like 'greater good'11:07
kanzureI'm completely, totally selfish11:07
kanzuremany people are worried that exponential growth will *not* be for The Greater Good11:07
fenngood thing you are not a nanobot11:07
shogunxlook...  i know you are a very smart lad, so I will say this once and drop it:  99.9 percent of the world are total sheep.  those of us who are not have a choice:  be a wolf, or a shepherd.11:08
kanzurehm?11:08
kanzurea wolf in sheep's clothing comes to mind11:08
nsh{{{{ }X }X }}}}}11:09
shogunxyou don't have to be toally selfless, but we are the modern shamen.  it is our role to guide the masses.  if we do it solely for personal gain, that gain comes at the expense of society as a whole.11:09
shogunxcurrent president is a perfect example.11:09
kanzureexpense?11:11
shogunxyes, expense.11:12
kanzureyou're assuming scarcity11:12
fennhe means oppression11:12
fennkilling, slavery, mind control11:13
kanzureI don't see how you can get from 'what we are doing' here to --> opression (killing, slavery, mind control)11:13
shogunxdon't get me on the tangent of artificial scarcity of commodities...  i'm talking about the guy who gives you $10/hour then bills $100/.hour for your work product.11:13
fennuh, ok i guess he does mean expense11:14
shogunxboth examples are right.11:14
shogunxmine is simply in microcosm.11:14
fennshogunx: do you understand what 'post scarcity society' means?11:14
shogunxof course.11:14
fennso, how does trying to build a post scarcity industrial base turn into giving people less money than you earn?11:15
shogunxkanzure, i was not saying that you were indulging in these odious behaviours, but you will have the opportunity to in your lifetime.11:15
fennshogunx: which is worse, giving the guy $10/hr or building a robot that does his job automatically?11:16
* fenn thinks giving him $10/hr11:16
shogunx$/10 hour, for sure.  with the robot, you are not stealing the guys life.11:16
fennso, i think that's what we're doing, systematically11:17
fennhuman-free factory11:18
fennwell, that's the end goal at least11:18
fennthis site really pisses me off http://techref.massmind.org/11:20
fenn"look at all the cool info we've aggregated, but YOU CANT HAVE IT"11:20
shogunxyeah, thats absurd11:31
shogunxi'm sure you guys saw this one this morning:11:33
shogunxhttp://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/04/2312227&from=rss11:33
fennnah i dont read news :)11:33
fennlies, LIES!11:34
shogunxheh heh11:34
fennwell at least the commenters have some sense11:35
shogunxthat is usually the case.  technocrat.net is a reasonable source... belongs to bruce perens11:37
kanzurekl;fjl;kdfjkljfklasdfja11:54
kanzureI did NOT need to click that Slashdot link11:55
kanzureoh my god I love Slashdot :)11:55
kanzurefirst few comments call out the bullshit11:55
shogunxas always... :)11:57
* kanzure feels better.11:58
kanzurehaha12:38
* kanzure grins12:38
kanzurehttp://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/2008-06-0512:38
kanzurefenn: polymerase "pause" problem solved (more or less). Now on to the nucleotide typing problem. Your mechanical/chemical belt (of tips) idea seems like the only thing so far, but I'm still looking.12:39
kanzurefenn: I don't understand how you expect polA to be able to make a new strand without a template to read from.12:57
kanzureI'm looking at some papers that describe the physical sites of action in the polymerase molecule and how this works12:57
kanzureand it's looking like the requirement of an input template strand to copy from is highly required12:58
kanzureI mean, to hack up polymerase to just have a matching nucleotide-tip activated or whatever, would be a tremendous feat of engineering12:58
kanzurehttp://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/bichaw/1996/35/i07/abs/bi951682j.html13:03
kanzurehm, they have to be bound to a strand in the first place /me checks the logs13:05
Phreedomkanzure: I don't see anyone on slashdot addressing actual shortcomings except for "self-replication", like degradation of parts over several generations13:06
kanzurethere were a few people pointing out that the design is flawed13:07
kanzurei.e., it doesn't self-replicate13:07
kanzurethere must be an easier way to say that13:07
kanzurefrom the outside it looks degrading13:07
kanzurelike saying "well, your book isn't complete, so you suck"13:07
kanzurebut that's not the point at all13:07
kanzurehow do I express this?13:07
kanzurea book can be written, typed out; the design of a self-replicating machine isn't quite like that ... it's something totally new that nobody knows how to do, and they claim /they/ do, and they are lying13:08
kanzure(2008-06-03 21:28:52) fenn: you wouldnt be copying the template strand, just using it to crawl along13:11
kanzure(2008-06-03 21:29:01) fenn: the information comes from elsewhere13:11
kanzureaha13:11
kanzure(2008-06-03 21:29:16) fenn: so its not actualy a template, more like a scaffold13:11
kanzure(2008-06-03 21:29:53) fenn: so, when you add some arbitrary sequence opposite the scaffold strand, the bases dont really fit13:11
kanzure(2008-06-03 21:31:09) fenn: normally the "doesnt really fit" would activate the proofreading domain13:11
kanzurehrm13:11
kanzurethe template is specifically used to figure out what dNTP to bind with 13:11
kanzurehowever, if we can "lock" it somehow ..13:12
kanzurefor example, making it so that the first nucleotide that polymerase reads is locked in place, or that the polymerase structure is pre-set and doesn't actually care about input molecules13:12
kanzure(oh, plus inhibition of DNA repair / checking mechanisms)13:15
fennthe way i see it, the template strand presses against some levers which activate the various nucleotide types13:15
fennso just hack those levers off and replace them with some kind of photonic signalling mechanism13:16
fennand you need a 'feed' switch too of course13:16
fenn'next'13:16
fennone problem with the scaffold strand idea is.. where does the scaffold come from? if its just some random dna then the strand being written won't stick, and it'll pull the enzyme off13:17
kanzurehrm, the strand won't stick? 13:32
kanzureI thought that it's attached to the DNA backbone13:33
fennno, sequence specific hybridization, remember13:33
kanzurewell, I'm ok with it not sticking really; the polymerase still does the input feeding thing13:33
kanzureso it's still attached13:33
fenni guess13:33
kanzurekind fo like by a hair thread ... :/13:33
fennwould be annoying to only be able to print 50 bp before it falls off13:34
kanzure'Expanding the Substrate Repertoire of a DNA Polymerase by Directed Evolution' <-- I've emailed the authors and asked about /reducing/ the substrate repertoire13:34
fennwhat does 'substrate repertoire' mean?13:34
kanzurethe number of nucleotide types that polymerase can use13:34
kanzure"Residues 614 and 615 are located in the C-terminus of the third strand of the four-stranded antiparallel  sheet of the "palm" region of the polymerase, at the junction with an -helix.30 The residues are part of the DYSQIELR motif A sequence, highly conserved in the DNA polymerase I enzyme from prokaryotes and eubacteria.45 This strand is of obvious functional relevance as it contains Glu610, which chelates one of the two catalytic13:35
kanzure'The problem with simply creating space in the active site for the OMeNTP by mutation of Glu615 to Gly or Ala is that the other functions of the Glu615 side chain will be lost. Thus, secondary mutations are required to restore these functions, possibly including binding a Mg2+ ion or a minor groove water molecule. This may explain why each of the isolated mutants also possesses mutation of Ile614 to Glu or Tyr, either of which shou13:36
kanzure'. In fact, two of the three unique protein sequences isolated (SFM19 and SFM30) contain the Ile614Glu mutation, including the most active SFM19 clone, possibly to most efficiently compensate for the loss of other Glu615 side-chain functions. Thus, it appears that the directed evolution process succeeded by first creating space for the 2'-substitutent and then retailoring the binding site as required for function.'13:36
kanzure'. CSR is based on a simple feedback loop consisting of a polymerase that replicates only its own encoding gene. ' 13:39
kanzure'' By using three cycles of CSR, we obtained variants of Taq DNA polymerase with 11-fold higher thermostability than the wild-type enzyme or with a >130-fold increased resistance to the potent inhibitor heparin13:39
fennnice13:41
fenn11-fold, so it should be good up to 1000C right? :)13:41
kanzureheh13:42
kanzurehttp://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/6/1307 'In addition, the mutagenesis rate can be controlled over a wide range by the inclusion of Mn2+or Mg2+during DNase I digestion, by choice of DNA polymerase used during gene reassembly as well as how the genes are prepared for shuffling (PCR amplification versus restriction enzyme digestion of plasmid DNA). These protocols should be useful for in vitro protein evolution, f13:43
* kanzure cries a little bit inside14:48
kanzurethe grad student I am assigned to mentioned RepRap and that it replicates14:49
wrldpcAnyone here in Boston know if the DIYBio meeting is actually happening tonight?15:26
wrldpcThere's been little to know communication.15:26
wrldpc*no15:26
kanzurecheck the mailing list16:50
kanzurealthough that might have been your email16:50
-!- kanzure [i=bryan@dhcp-146-6-213-183.icmb.utexas.edu] has quit ["Leaving."]17:19
-!- Vedestin [n=Vedestin@d122-109-35-58.sbr3.nsw.optusnet.com.au] has joined #hplusroadmap20:04
-!- kanzure [n=bryan@cpe-70-113-54-112.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #hplusroadmap20:15
kanzureHey.20:16
Phreedomkanzure: FUD seems to do wonders for RepRap ;)20:16
kanzureHow's that?20:16
Phreedom(21:48:59)  kanzure:  the grad student I am assigned to mentioned RepRap and that it replicates 20:17
kanzureso, I talked with him about it20:17
kanzureand it turns out that what the problem might be, re: the definitions and so on, is more about issues related to the sigmodal levelling off of the exponential ideal of self-replication, i.e. exponentially goes up, then exponentially levels off (since parts to RepRap /cost/ money)20:18
kanzurewhereas I want to maximize the exponential up via 'philanthropic bootstrapping' (which I've recently decided isn't the best thing to hope for -- but he thinks it's ok, I could possibly be persuaded)20:19
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has quit [Remote closed the connection]20:56
-!- ybit [n=h@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined #hplusroadmap20:59
-!- Phreedom [n=freedom@www.online.dn.ua] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)]23:04
-!- Phreedom [n=freedom@www.online.dn.ua] has joined #hplusroadmap23:16

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!