2012-11-13.log

--- Log opened Tue Nov 13 00:00:11 2012
-!- thoughtcrime [~doomboxsa@75.105.12.23] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]00:03
-!- _Sol_ [~Sol@c-174-57-58-11.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]00:34
-!- ThomasEgi [~thomas@panda3d/ThomasEgi] has joined ##hplusroadmap01:21
-!- Maluseth1 [~Maluseth@99.235.138.30] has quit []01:48
-!- sylph_mako [~mako@103-9-42-1.flip.co.nz] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]02:04
-!- nmz787 [~Nathan@50.43.43.17] has joined ##hplusroadmap02:08
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: lichen02:12
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: epitron, augur, AlonzoTG, upgrayeddd, ParahSailin02:12
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: ParahSail1n, Thorbinator02:12
-!- Netsplit over, joins: augur, ParahSailin, lichen, AlonzoTG, Thorbinator, ParahSail1n, upgrayeddd, epitron02:15
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: devrando102:20
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: ThomasEgi, gedankenstuecke, nmz787, He||eshin02:21
-!- Netsplit over, joins: nmz787, ThomasEgi, devrando1, He||eshin, gedankenstuecke02:22
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: ElixirVitae02:23
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: heathjs, curt1s, superkuh02:23
-!- Netsplit over, joins: ElixirVitae, superkuh, heathjs, curt1s02:24
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: nmz78702:25
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: ThomasEgi02:26
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: devrando1, He||eshin02:26
-!- Netsplit over, joins: nmz787, ThomasEgi02:27
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: gedankenstuecke02:27
-!- Netsplit over, joins: devrando1, He||eshin, gedankenstuecke02:27
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: AdrianG02:28
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: brownies02:28
-!- Netsplit over, joins: AdrianG, brownies02:28
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: Lemminkainen_02:30
-!- Netsplit over, joins: Lemminkainen_02:30
-!- ParahSail1n [~eg@50-194-178-148-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]03:49
-!- ParahSail1n [~eg@50-194-178-148-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap03:52
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has joined ##hplusroadmap03:55
-!- Maluseth1 [Maluseth1@99.235.138.30] has joined ##hplusroadmap04:53
Maluseth1I have spent days now searching for this "universal" machine for making precision parts, 'micromachining.' Instead purchasing different machines at 20k to 50k, I thought why not buy a 200k to 300k machine that does it all?04:55
Maluseth1but such thing does not exist.04:55
ThomasEgisrsly.. what did you expect :D04:56
Maluseth1if you were to pick 2 machines that could fundamentally cover all axis and angles -04:56
Maluseth1which machines would they be?04:56
Maluseth1lathe and mills?04:56
ThomasEgiall??04:56
ThomasEgiall are a lot of degrees of freedom04:56
Maluseth1specifically then04:56
Maluseth1gears. and outer shells.04:56
Maluseth1and holes04:57
Maluseth1so thats... lathe = gears04:57
ThomasEgidoubt you can get a one-size-fits all machine04:57
Maluseth1outer shell shaping = 5 axis machine04:57
Maluseth1holes = drills ?:04:57
ThomasEgiyou can mill gears on a 5 axis machine just fine.04:57
ThomasEgiyou can also get a 5axis and a rotary table04:58
ThomasEgibut those are not really for micro-mechanics04:58
Maluseth1there seems to be 5 axis machines for precision manufacturing04:58
ThomasEgiyeah but... precision is to be defined04:58
Maluseth1so like i imagined, 5 axis would be the ultimate choice.04:58
Maluseth1been reading up on swiss-type lathes.04:59
ThomasEgithere's a big difference between precision in regular machines, micromachines, and stuff like nano structures04:59
Maluseth1but this does long screw type of work and gears.04:59
Maluseth1yes definitely04:59
Maluseth1when they say precision, i have to read up on it carefully04:59
ThomasEgiyou can't cover all with just one machine.05:00
Maluseth1see how "precise it really can go."05:00
Maluseth1yes05:00
Maluseth1but starting with a 5 axis would be a safe bet no?05:00
Maluseth1i gotta try and find something universal...05:00
Maluseth1or things that have lots of mod-capable....05:00
ThomasEgifor bigger parts, a 5 axis machine sure is a sweet toy. but you probably want to build furniture with it rather than clockworks05:00
Maluseth1yes05:01
Maluseth1clockworks are mostly gears - and these are suitable for swiss-style lathes05:01
Maluseth12d work almost.05:01
Maluseth1gears.05:01
Maluseth1so that's what it looked like on the videos...05:01
Maluseth1i am dazed.05:01
Maluseth1i've gone crazy, there are so many manufacturers,05:02
Maluseth1so many tools05:02
Maluseth1i didn't think there'd be this many05:02
ThomasEgithere are countless.05:02
Maluseth1infinite05:02
ThomasEgifor each range of precision.05:02
Maluseth1it's a universe.05:02
Maluseth1i am tired now05:02
ThomasEgithe question is. what do you want to build05:02
ThomasEgiand then. you can get the right tools for that.05:02
Maluseth1my goal is i guess making precise machines for medical stuff05:03
ThomasEgiand there are wolrds between a the gear of a wristwatch, and MEMS stuff05:03
Maluseth1something between wristwatch parts and MEMS stuff05:03
Maluseth1in the scale of realm (size)05:03
Maluseth1so that's quite small05:04
Maluseth1ok05:04
Maluseth1i will keep on looking05:04
ThomasEgiso.. in the range of single-digit cm in maximum size. and very high resolution?05:04
Maluseth1i wish someone could just give me the answer.05:04
Maluseth1mm i would say,05:05
Maluseth1or microm05:05
Maluseth1Um05:05
ThomasEgihm.. piezo hexapod might be of interest for you05:05
Maluseth1i just saw that on an ad05:05
Maluseth1that portable looking thing05:05
Maluseth1is it computer numerical controlled?05:05
ThomasEgiwell you can controll it using analog potentiometers too :D05:06
ThomasEgibut they all come with computer controlls05:06
Maluseth1but this is more like MEMS you stack things in layers05:07
Maluseth1i am hoping something like rapid prototyping05:07
Maluseth1milling to be specific05:07
Maluseth1hmm05:07
Maluseth1back to those universal centers05:07
Maluseth1i will find05:08
Maluseth1thank you for your suggestions...........05:08
ThomasEgithere's laser sintering05:08
ThomasEgiwhich is pretty precise too.05:08
Maluseth1lasers yes05:09
Maluseth1always precise05:09
Maluseth1right ok05:09
ThomasEgibut milling and rapid protoyping usualy are 2 different things :d05:09
-!- _Sol_ [~Sol@c-174-57-58-11.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap05:09
Maluseth1laser sintering, is this LAM ? additive manufacturing?05:10
ThomasEginot very experienced with that.05:10
Maluseth1i thought they aren't out yet by commercially the machines05:10
ThomasEgithere definetly are laser sintering for metals05:11
ThomasEgihttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_laser_sintering05:12
Maluseth1this is incredibly difficult. one wrong move and it will be many years before i can re-begin05:12
Maluseth1SLS05:13
Maluseth1got it05:13
Maluseth1it looks amazing05:13
ThomasEginot sure bout precision and surface properties tho05:14
ThomasEgibut. definetly a worth a look05:14
Maluseth1how much would they cost though05:14
Maluseth1hope it's affordable05:14
ThomasEgiaffordable is a question on how much money you have05:14
ThomasEgithose things wont be cheap05:14
ThomasEgineither on purchase, nor on operation05:14
Maluseth1i believe 150k is possible05:15
Maluseth1maybe even more05:15
Maluseth1at 200k to 250, even 300k, but they must be universal05:16
Maluseth1in such a way that it pretty much can shape anything,05:16
Maluseth1and no other tools (or just some lesser costly tools) required05:16
ThomasEgithere's no such thing as "truly universal"05:16
-!- upgrayeddd [u2969@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rcgoicjgeesyztqq] has quit [Excess Flood]05:16
ThomasEgilaser sintering is as universal as it can get05:17
ThomasEgiit works wtih many materials and allows you to build very complex things. but depending on what you want to do, other tools might be a lot cheaper05:17
Maluseth1maybe i should just get a precision 3d printer and use the machine shop services05:17
Maluseth1for metallic manufacture.... sigh05:17
Maluseth1i can't believe SLS is real05:18
Maluseth1amazing info05:18
Maluseth1thank you05:18
ThomasEgiit got poor resolution tho05:18
-!- upgrayeddd [u2969@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kxinmafyvpodyjnj] has joined ##hplusroadmap05:18
ThomasEgiDMLS exists too. but my guess is, that it's more expensive05:19
Maluseth1wow05:20
Maluseth1ok05:20
ThomasEgiagain.. same drawbacks on surface quality and stuff05:21
Maluseth1then there are machines for surface finishing05:21
Maluseth1at least the shapes are formed with rapid prototyping -like universal way05:22
Maluseth1that just makes everything simpler if not simple05:22
Maluseth1yes dmls makes 20 to 40 microns05:23
Maluseth1thats small05:23
Maluseth1precise05:23
Maluseth1versal dmls machine05:25
Maluseth1oops05:25
Maluseth1typo05:25
ThomasEgithat's like.. the size of a boulder comparet to MEMS tho05:25
ThomasEgihttp://www.bacteria-world.com/mems-hinge.htm05:26
Maluseth1could there be machines so precise that goes into the realm of mems w/lasers05:26
Maluseth1wow couldnt sleep at all05:28
Maluseth1hope i'll find the answer i hope dmls is ===05:28
Maluseth1in the range of purchase05:28
ThomasEgilasers are cool but they have limits,too.05:29
Maluseth1600k + it seems05:29
ThomasEgiwas about so say..05:29
ThomasEgiit's probably a lot cheaper to just ask a protoyping service to do the parts05:29
ThomasEgicause unless you operate those machines 24/7 they won't pay off05:30
Maluseth1yeah05:30
Maluseth1what i was thinking so a precise 3d printing machine for prototypes05:30
Maluseth1best tangible building05:31
Maluseth1blocks05:31
Maluseth1i can touch n see05:31
ThomasEgi3d printing what material?05:31
Maluseth1plastic filaments of course05:31
Maluseth1but enough to visualize05:31
ThomasEgiso. just a regular 3d printer?05:31
Maluseth1and send over specs to services05:31
Maluseth1no high definition printer in 3d05:32
Maluseth1very high definition05:32
ThomasEgifilament printing has limits05:32
ThomasEgiat some point there's no way around sintering05:32
ThomasEgideveloping an open-source laser-sinter machine would be pretty cool tho05:33
Maluseth1yes but what i saw, they can print up to parts size of a... dot05:33
Maluseth1yeah sintering seems to be the singularity of all manufacturing process05:33
Maluseth1about the money.... sigh05:34
ThomasEgiwell precision comes at a price05:34
Maluseth1yes thank you so much for this05:37
Maluseth1information05:37
ThomasEgijust.. stay out of the mm range05:37
Maluseth1now i can make a step at least05:37
ThomasEgieither go bigger. or smaller^05:37
ThomasEgiand if you have to produce parts in that size range. ask some prototyping service.05:37
Maluseth1yes i think i must go bigger (cause it's cheaper)05:37
ThomasEgiif you go smaller it becomes cheaper,too.05:38
ThomasEgigoing away from mechanical manufactoring05:38
Maluseth1really? but not CNC right-05:38
Maluseth1yes i thought so05:38
Maluseth1somekind of lithography technique or something05:38
Maluseth1manual05:38
ThomasEgiwell lithography is not so manual05:39
Maluseth1i dont know what im talking about05:39
Maluseth1hahaha05:39
ThomasEgiit does involve more process steps.05:39
Maluseth1i get it though05:39
ThomasEgibut it can be done at a budget05:39
ThomasEgithe masks used for lithography, are of course, engineered on a compter05:39
ThomasEgiprinted out, minified etc.05:39
Maluseth1so far HD 3d printer + just average fabrication tools for bigger objects.05:40
Maluseth1i see05:40
ThomasEgireally doubt the printer would pay off05:40
ThomasEgiunless you produce in big numbers05:40
ThomasEgiwhich.. i don't think you will.05:40
chris_99you can avoid masks using stereolithography, if you're making 3D objects05:40
Maluseth1what the hello05:41
Maluseth1ok05:41
Maluseth1incredible05:41
Maluseth1and incredibly complex05:41
chris_99gives a lot higher res than filament though05:42
ThomasEgistill.. comparebly simple05:42
Maluseth1ok back to planning.05:44
Maluseth1my goal is biomedical invention of somesort05:44
-!- thoughtcrime [~doomboxsa@75.105.12.23] has joined ##hplusroadmap05:44
ThomasEgihm. there's also multi jet modelling05:45
ThomasEgithey are a bit like inkjet plotters for 3d.05:46
ThomasEgithey are more of the desktop-version of a 3d printer.05:46
ThomasEgiwhen doing biomedical stuff. you not only have to take care about precision. but also the material itself, biocompatibility, coating it etc.05:47
ThomasEgiso.. you probably want to at some coating tools to your list. to do parylene and teflon coating, maybe metallic coatings,too.05:48
-!- heathjs [quassel@2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:6e5b] has quit [Changing host]05:50
-!- heathjs [quassel@unaffiliated/ybit] has joined ##hplusroadmap05:50
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]05:53
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has joined ##hplusroadmap05:54
Maluseth1yes i read palladium is biocompatible05:57
Maluseth1w/ out any allergic reactions05:57
Maluseth1or rejection among few other synthetic materals05:57
Maluseth1there appears to be moulds making with sand in dmls05:58
Maluseth1i wonder if its cheaper05:58
ThomasEgiyou.. probably want to step back and look at what you really need again.06:02
ThomasEgior rather. what you plan to develop06:02
ThomasEgiand then look for the tools06:02
ThomasEgiin any case. get a sandwich toaster.06:02
ThomasEgithose things are awesome06:03
-!- audy [~audy@heyaudy.com] has quit [Changing host]06:35
-!- audy [~audy@unaffiliated/audy] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:35
ThomasEgiMaluseth1, in case you are still wide awake http://objet.com/3d-printers06:35
ThomasEgithey offer material for producing parts with certain medical compatibility06:36
ThomasEgitheir desktop version goes for 20k06:39
-!- ElixirVitae [~Shehrazad@unaffiliated/shehrazad] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]06:41
ThomasEgitheir object30 pro, goes for bout 43k06:43
chris_99bargain06:43
ThomasEgiindeed06:43
ThomasEgiespecially as the 30pro can print 7 materials06:43
ThomasEgiamongst them, transparent and high-temperature resistant. so you can print vacum-forms with it06:44
ThomasEgiand.. that's something that might even pay off.06:44
ThomasEgithat thing's pretty sweet actually. you could print molds for parts ,too.06:51
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@unaffiliated/shehrazad] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:53
-!- delinquentme [~asdfasdf@igb-carlcrott.igb.illinois.edu] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:54
kanzurehttp://diybioeurope.eventbrite.com07:05
kanzurehttp://www.diybio.eu/diybio-europe-kick-off-meeting-1st-dec-paris/07:06
ThomasEgithose multimaterial printers are pretty impressive07:14
chris_99they could even print glass i think?!07:15
ThomasEgitransparent materials yes. glass no07:16
chris_99yeah maybe that one can't but - http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/computing-components/peripherals/3d-printers-can-now-print-in-glass-63863607:17
-!- lichen [~lichen@c-24-21-206-64.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]07:17
-!- Jaakko96 [~Jaakko@94-194-89-130.zone8.bethere.co.uk] has joined ##hplusroadmap07:19
ThomasEgichris_99, doesn't look too impressive tho07:19
ThomasEgii wonder if they can get the crystal-clear surface,too.07:20
ThomasEgiwithout manual polishing07:20
chris_99yeah07:20
chidokanzure: do you know of anyone from here headed there?07:23
kanzurenope07:23
kanzurei mean, i don't know who's going07:23
ThomasEgihm. there's a direct train to paris.. running from a city close to mine.07:32
ThomasEgiprobably won't attend tho07:33
-!- lichen [~lichen@c-24-21-206-64.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap07:34
archelsBrain energy metabolism and blood flow differences in healthy aging07:44
archelsspot the oxymoron.07:44
-!- Jaakko96 [~Jaakko@94-194-89-130.zone8.bethere.co.uk] has quit [Quit: Nettalk6 - www.ntalk.de]07:49
-!- abetusk [~abetusk@cpe-24-58-232-122.twcny.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: Leaving]08:00
-!- augur [~augur@208.58.5.87] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]08:04
-!- delinquentme [~asdfasdf@igb-carlcrott.igb.illinois.edu] has quit [Read error: Operation timed out]08:33
-!- augur [~augur@129-2-129-35.wireless.umd.edu] has joined ##hplusroadmap08:39
kanzureyashgaroth: have you stalked "doug wilson"?09:13
nmz787kanzure, how was the cabin?09:19
nmz787so I didn't make it past the second google interview09:20
nmz787i thought I did pretty decent, but I knew afterwards there were some mistake09:20
nmz787but they were pretty minimal I thought09:20
-!- devrando1 is now known as devrandom09:21
kanzurecabin was interesting09:24
kanzurewhat were the google interview questions this time?09:24
nmz787implement memcopy in c09:26
nmz787implement memmove (memcopy with a check for overlapping data bounds)09:26
nmz787implement in python a function that increments a number that is stored as a string09:26
kanzureint(number_stored_as_string)+109:29
nmz787then you have to cast it back09:30
kanzurestr(int(number_you_stored_as_string)+1))09:30
nmz787i also offered an if/then tree checking just the last char, then setting it back to the next value, except in case of 909:30
kanzurealso i bet they would be a douche about it and make the number have commas, so you'd have to use the number formatting functions09:30
nmz787oh actually you can't cast to int,09:30
nmz787because they said it was for BIG integers09:31
nmz787i.e. bigger than int could store09:31
nmz787no commas decimals, only whole nums09:31
kanzureseems to work to me.. int(str(2 ** 10000))09:31
nmz787yeah but for a number that's longer than int can hol?09:32
nmz787hold?09:32
nmz787so anyway I said the if/then 0-9 cases would be less operations than the casting09:32
nmz787and went that route09:32
ThomasEginmz787, python automatically handles big ints09:33
nmz787hmm, well google said they wanted me to use strings with big ints09:34
ThomasEgiso.. kanzure's sollution will totaly work. if they told you something else... then well. tell them to eat their friggin questions..09:34
nmz787'imagine you were making a library to handle really big numbers using strings to store them in, how would you add 1 to a number you've stored with this library?'09:34
ThomasEgiin worst case.. install scipy. i think they allow for numbers up to infinite09:35
nmz787heh09:35
nmz787well anyway i didn't make it09:35
nmz787prob because i didnt tell them to use scipy09:35
kanzureinterviewers really hate it when you tell them the answer is to use a standard library09:36
kanzurenevermind that a standard memcopy is going to be thousands of times better than whatever crap you come up with in 5min09:36
nmz787yeah09:37
ThomasEgijust checked. python's interpreter automatically switches over to another backend when numbers grow big. there's no integer limit09:37
nmz787i just had a for loop depp copying each data block09:37
ThomasEgiso.. you can just do.. yournumber +=1 #bitch please09:37
nmz787but i realized after that i didnt pass in a pointer so it wouldn't have worked09:37
kanzure"#bitch please" is not pep8 compliant :o09:37
nmz787but it was mostly there09:37
nmz787first line was to check if the dest was =009:38
nmz787but again i forgot the & there09:38
nmz787huh09:38
nmz787well09:38
nmz787i guess if they know that, then i really screwed that up09:38
ThomasEgikanzure, prefer triple quotes?09:39
kanzurepep8 just says something about including a space after the '#' symbol09:39
ThomasEgithose are just recommendations anyway09:39
ThomasEgilooks like python's limit for long integers is 4,294,967,295 digits.09:41
ThomasEgi4.. billion... forking.. digits. that's bout as many digits as i have bytes in my RAM.09:42
ThomasEgiwhere did you apply for anyway?09:43
ParahSail1nis the backend for that GMP?09:43
ThomasEgihttp://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0237/09:44
nmz787they contacted me, it was for site reliability09:44
nmz787so bug fixin09:44
ParahSail1noh no, that wouldnt be license compatible09:44
nmz787i'd rather be doing lithography or cloning, but hey I need a job09:44
kanzurehm. the quadcore w520 laptops seem to support 32 GB RAM.09:52
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@unaffiliated/shehrazad] has quit [Quit: Leaving]10:13
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@unaffiliated/shehrazad] has joined ##hplusroadmap10:14
-!- augur [~augur@129-2-129-35.wireless.umd.edu] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]10:26
-!- augur [~augur@129-2-129-35.wireless.umd.edu] has joined ##hplusroadmap10:27
ParahSail1noverheard in DIYBio list "I'm interested in culturing some soil bacteria and screening it for the ability to break down lipofuscin (this is not my idea originally, you may have read of it being proposed by Aubrey de Grey - but as far as I can tell nobody has actually carried out the experiment)."10:42
ParahSail1nfacepalm10:42
ParahSail1ni guess i should have published something in the journal of negative results in biomedicine10:43
kanzureiirc there was also some longecity/imminst soil study that was done too10:44
kanzureParahSail1n: what exactly did you do?10:45
nmz787its weird that you would choose soil bacteria though10:45
ParahSail1nwell for a while i was a SENS grad student10:46
nmz787the soil bacteria are a good start for enzyme mining, but they seem unlikely to be directly beneficial10:46
nmz787do we have longnow folks in here?10:46
ParahSail1ni tried in wastewater treatment plant activated sludge10:47
kanzurei used to be into the longnow stuff10:47
kanzurelongnow/brand was the reason i used to write all my dates in 02006 format until i realized i was lame.10:48
kanzureParahSail1n: yeah i know your SENS background, i just haven't heard about your involvement in a lipofuscin project or the results or what happened10:49
-!- alusion [~alusion@unaffiliated/alusion] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]10:51
nmz787kanzure: do you know john bishop http://norsam.com/about-us.html11:03
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@unaffiliated/shehrazad] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]11:24
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@78.174.63.193] has joined ##hplusroadmap11:28
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@78.174.63.193] has quit [Changing host]11:28
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@unaffiliated/shehrazad] has joined ##hplusroadmap11:28
-!- He||eshin is now known as Helleshin12:00
-!- augur [~augur@129-2-129-35.wireless.umd.edu] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]12:35
-!- devrandom [~devrandom@gateway/tor-sasl/niftyzero1] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]12:43
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]12:54
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has joined ##hplusroadmap12:54
-!- devrandom [~devrandom@gateway/tor-sasl/niftyzero1] has joined ##hplusroadmap12:56
-!- wtf [~doomboxsa@75.105.12.23] has joined ##hplusroadmap12:57
-!- sylph_mako [~mako@103-9-42-1.flip.co.nz] has joined ##hplusroadmap12:57
-!- thoughtcrime [~doomboxsa@75.105.12.23] has quit [Read error: Operation timed out]12:58
-!- augur [~augur@208.58.5.87] has joined ##hplusroadmap13:09
-!- alusion [~alusion@173.79.17.100] has joined ##hplusroadmap13:23
-!- alusion [~alusion@173.79.17.100] has quit [Changing host]13:23
-!- alusion [~alusion@unaffiliated/alusion] has joined ##hplusroadmap13:23
kanzure13:28 <+iimarckus> kanzure: do you have to manually approve wiki accounts?13:28
kanzurejrayhawk: do i have to type addaccess for each new user?13:28
jrayhawkNo, the wiki is 066613:29
kanzurewhat about haxwiki?13:29
jrayhawkoh, yeah, unless you want to pinyconfig haxwiki core.sharedrepository 066613:29
jrayhawkand rebuildrepo haxwiki since apparently i haven't updated piny on there for a while13:30
kanzureand then rebuildre-- ok yeah13:31
-!- Juul [~Juul@171.65.210.170] has joined ##hplusroadmap13:33
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@unaffiliated/shehrazad] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]13:45
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@78.174.63.193] has joined ##hplusroadmap13:49
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@78.174.63.193] has quit [Changing host]13:49
-!- elixirvitae [~elixirvit@unaffiliated/shehrazad] has joined ##hplusroadmap13:49
nmz787kanzure: hey so do you know that dude?13:57
kanzurenmz787: nope14:08
kanzurespeaking of stewart brand.. i just got an email he blasted out about some people that are going around fixing broken clock towers14:48
kanzure"A few years ago these underground hackers and artists became infamous when one morning the clock at the Panthéon, that had not worked in years, began chiming.  There have been 15 such restorations done without permission."14:48
kanzure"The secretive members of the Paris Urban eXperiment, known internally as "The UX", have spent the last 30 years surreptitiously probing into the vast hidden world under the city --- and improving it."14:48
nmz787fenn: maybe there could be a bio CO2 capture system AKA the desert zeolite water collector using PEI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyethylenimine#CO2_capture15:00
nmz787fenn: well doesn't have to be bio*15:01
-!- wtf is now known as thoughtcrime15:31
ThomasEginmz787, wish there'd be more efficient ways to collect H2O15:38
-!- Juul [~Juul@171.65.210.170] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]15:48
-!- Juul [~Juul@171.65.210.170] has joined ##hplusroadmap15:52
-!- delinquentme [~asdfasdf@igb-carlcrott.igb.illinois.edu] has joined ##hplusroadmap15:56
-!- joshcryer [g@c-76-25-9-95.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap15:58
-!- joshcryer [g@c-76-25-9-95.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Changing host]15:58
-!- joshcryer [g@unaffiliated/joshcryer] has joined ##hplusroadmap15:58
-!- Juul [~Juul@171.65.210.170] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]16:02
-!- Juul [~Juul@171.65.210.170] has joined ##hplusroadmap16:06
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has quit [Quit: Leaving]16:08
kanzurewhy aren't charities run on bitcoins? you could prove that your bitcoins are going to the exact things that you earmarked them for.16:30
-!- Juul [~Juul@171.65.210.170] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]16:38
-!- Maluseth1 [Maluseth1@99.235.138.30] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]16:45
-!- aristarchus [~aristarch@unaffiliated/aristarchus] has joined ##hplusroadmap16:50
-!- delinquentme [~asdfasdf@igb-carlcrott.igb.illinois.edu] has quit [Quit: Leaving]16:53
AdrianGbecause charities arent really about helping anyone16:54
-!- nmz787 [~Nathan@50.43.43.17] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]17:03
ThomasEgiAdrianG, thank you for helping us help you help us all.17:04
streetyWhat would be the advantage of that? It's all just accounting, unless some bitcoins are different to other bitcoins.17:08
AdrianGThomasEgi, pls send a cheque. i am not a charity.17:08
kanzurestreety: some people donate to charities expecting the money to go to a certain thing17:09
AdrianGfools17:09
ThomasEgii'd even send you 2cent for that wisdom above. but that'd be uneconomical due to the banks17:09
AdrianGorly17:10
ThomasEgicharity.. is mostly psycological treatment, with a tad of self-sustainment, a lot of paperworks, and, more often than not, too little effect.17:10
ThomasEgimoney gets donated, nice pictures for websites are taken. real help... usualy nowhere to be found outside the field of vision of the cameras.17:10
streetyThis I know, but I still don't see the advantage. They could just route other bitcoins to other causes they would ordinarily have given to my requested cause17:11
ThomasEgiyou see.. if you could trace the money.. you.d see that most gets wasted. so why saw of the branch you'r sitting on?17:11
kanzurethe idea is that if you have a more effective charity model, you could theoretically eat up the donations that are usually going to all the other shitty charities17:14
kanzurethrowing millions of dollars at random, unrelated grants to "cure cancer" isn't necessarily going to build an informed research strategy (and neither will crowdsourcing, for that matter)17:16
ThomasEgiif throwing around millions would do any good... the Federal Reserve would be like mother theresa. we all know... they'r not.17:19
streetyFrom a talk I attended recently James Watson seems to be of a similar opinion, better to throw cash at a small number of high risk high reward projects/investigators17:21
streetyThough that's probably not such a good appeal to authority, he largely came across and cross and a little bit crazy17:22
kanzurestreety: so you disagree with the approach here? http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/open-science-summit-2010/scott-johnson-myelin-repair-foundation/17:23
streetytaking a look now17:26
kanzureaha there's the number. "in 2009 nearly $304 billion was given to nonprofits" http://fundingchangeconsulting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Philanthropy-in-the-United-States.updated.pdf17:31
kanzureso anyway, what if you could buy the same amount of charity for only $152 billion?17:32
ThomasEgiso they got 300billion.. and.. what did they do with it?17:36
kanzureare you asking me, or in general, or what?17:39
-!- nmz787 [~Nathan@static-50-43-43-17.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:41
streetykanzure, there were lots of points I'm not entirely sure hold together. Having said that I agree with the approach17:42
streetyI think you need more than that though, the approach is incremental rather than transformative in terms of the scientific output17:43
kanzuremany many charitable organizations need a small amount of engineering to solve their missions17:44
kanzureyou don't need a revolution in fucking science to make a cheaper malaria cure patent17:44
kanzureright?17:44
kanzureare you saying that charity must necessarily be transformative, rather than incremental?17:45
streetyyou don't need very much at all for a patent of any sort17:45
streetyan actual cure though? Perhaps you do17:45
streetynot at all, a charity can do whatever it wants17:46
kanzurewell, my comment was a combination of (1) anger that charities pay patent licensing fees or that they lease out their patents and make money that way, and (2) just an example that doesn't require transformative output17:46
kanzureok17:46
kanzurebut yes, buying "a unit of transformative output" with bitcoins is much more murky to envision than "buying a centrifuge for SENS' latest research project"17:48
kanzure*buying a centrifuge... with bitcoins17:48
streetyat the moment it seems a defendable patent does help with getting a treatment to market, it's probably better that it be with a charity focusing on treatment than with most other entities17:48
kanzurei bet charities are so inefficient because nobody has bothered to sit down and design something better17:51
streetyskipping back to a point earlier when you say "cure cancer" what exactly do you mean?17:52
kanzurethey don't really have the same pressure to be efficient like businesses that are competing one-to-one except in the vague sense that they compete for donations (but the only way they would fail to raise the same amount of money is related to bad publicity, not so much product/output)17:52
streetyefficiency is going to rather, largely because of the people running them17:52
-!- yashgaroth [~f@cpe-66-27-117-179.san.res.rr.com] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:52
kanzurestreety: it's well known among researchers that you don't "cure cancer". cancer is far too vague of a word and refers to many different conditions.17:53
streetyindeed, I would argue it is even more complicated than that17:53
streetyeven for a narrowly defined cancer the idea of a cure is vague17:54
kanzuredespite that fact, there are still charities that accept donations in the name of "curing cancer"17:54
kanzuredoes that answer your question?17:54
AdrianGit does not.17:54
streetypartly, I was curious at what stringency of cure achieved you would consider good value for money to be received17:56
streetywhere "you" is the channel participants in general17:56
kanzurepersonally i would probably not donate under most reasonable circumstances (there are unreasonable circumstances where i would) mostly because i think that spending money on fixing inefficiencies in $300B would be more valuable17:58
yashgarothmoney spent per cure is a silly metric when you don't have a drug ready for development; we'd be far better off putting dem cancer moniez into basic biology research17:58
kanzuree.g. what if only $3M/year would increase charitable efficiency by 10%? that would be like donating $30B ;)17:58
AdrianGin your dreams maybe17:59
yashgarothevery fucking molbio paper out there has to mention how the research is tangentially related to curing something, often cancer17:59
streetythe problem comes when you don't agree with the mission of every charity17:59
AdrianGyashgaroth, this research is known to the state of California to cause cancer.18:01
yashgarothyo momma's known to blah blah you know the rest18:01
AdrianGto cause cancer?18:01
yashgarothin california, yes18:02
yashgarothanyway, when you're looking at biology through the lens of disease only, you tend to miss things that are often important18:03
streetyThe state of california in thr US substitutes for the Daily Mail in the UK as the go-to source for cancer cause/cure classification?18:04
yashgarothnah they just pass a lot of stupid ballot initiatives18:04
streetyyashgaroth, agree completely, that's what I meant for transformative science18:04
streetyI'm not sure if that is better or worse18:05
yashgarothnothing is worse than the daily mail18:05
streetybut does it cause cancer?18:06
yashgarothmetaphorical18:06
yashgarothI'd imagine charity has an obligation to be transformative, since they don't need to turn a profit or have popular support (i.e. industry and gov't respectively)18:07
streetyonly transformative within the scope of their mission though18:09
AdrianGlol daily mail is known the state of california to cause cancer18:24
-!- augur [~augur@208.58.5.87] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]18:30
-!- augur [~augur@208.58.5.87] has joined ##hplusroadmap18:31
-!- thoughtcrime [~doomboxsa@75.105.12.23] has quit [Read error: Operation timed out]18:33
-!- ThomasEgi [~thomas@panda3d/ThomasEgi] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]18:38
-!- augur is now known as arabcoffee18:49
-!- arabcoffee is now known as augur18:50
-!- Tabrenus [~Tabrenus@213.211.132.86.static.edpnet.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap19:42
-!- aristarchus [~aristarch@unaffiliated/aristarchus] has quit [Quit: Leaving]19:47
-!- delinquentme [~asdfasdf@173-165-51-5-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap19:51
-!- delinquentme [~asdfasdf@173-165-51-5-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]20:08
-!- delinquentme [~asdfasdf@173-165-51-5-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap20:21
-!- user123abc [~sally@67.171.79.251] has joined ##hplusroadmap20:28
-!- Tabrenus [~Tabrenus@213.211.132.86.static.edpnet.net] has quit [Quit: Tabrenus]20:37
-!- Adifex [~Adifex@65-128-22-247.hlrn.qwest.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap21:17
-!- justi499 [~smuxi@184-76-124-69.war.clearwire-wmx.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap21:20
-!- ParahSailin [~parah@unaffiliated/parahsailin] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]21:26
-!- ParahSailin [~parah@unaffiliated/parahsailin] has joined ##hplusroadmap21:26
-!- justi499 [~smuxi@184-76-124-69.war.clearwire-wmx.net] has left ##hplusroadmap []21:26
-!- justi499 [~smuxi@184-76-124-69.war.clearwire-wmx.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap21:26
-!- justi499 [~smuxi@184-76-124-69.war.clearwire-wmx.net] has left ##hplusroadmap []21:26
-!- BioGuy_ [~BioGuy@184-76-124-69.war.clearwire-wmx.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap21:30
-!- delinquentme [~asdfasdf@173-165-51-5-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]21:35
-!- alusion [~alusion@unaffiliated/alusion] has left ##hplusroadmap ["Leaving"]21:58
-!- yashgaroth [~f@cpe-66-27-117-179.san.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: Leaving]22:37
-!- Adifex [~Adifex@65-128-22-247.hlrn.qwest.net] has quit [Quit: Adifex]22:51
-!- BioGuy_ [~BioGuy@184-76-124-69.war.clearwire-wmx.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]23:03
-!- BioGuy_ [~BioGuy@184.76.124.69] has joined ##hplusroadmap23:10
-!- mgodinho [~user@pdpc/supporter/active/mgodinho] has joined ##hplusroadmap23:15
kanzureboop23:26
-!- klafka [~textual@c-67-174-253-229.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap23:43
--- Log closed Wed Nov 14 00:00:12 2012

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!