--- Log opened Fri Jan 07 00:00:23 2022 04:42 -!- enick_368 [~afilini-m@2001:bc8:1828:245::2] has joined ##miniscript 09:33 -!- dr_orlovsky [~dr-orlovs@31.14.40.18] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 13:16 -!- sipa [~sipa@user/sipa] has joined ##miniscript 13:16 -!- mode/##miniscript [+o sipa] by ChanServ 13:16 <@sipa> What is the current thinking on descriptors/miniscript notation for CHECKSIGADD based multisig? 13:17 <@sipa> I vaguely remember some discussion, but not if there was any conclusion. 13:18 <@sipa> In particular: two separate fragments for the n-of-n (which is just ` CHECKSIGVERIFY CHECKSIGVERIFY CHECKSIG`) and k-of-n (` CHECKSIG CHECKSIGADD CHECKSIGADD EQUAL`) case? Or the same one. 21:09 < _aj_> sipa: both, if only so miniscript can translate the former back to "n-of-n" easily? 21:09 -!- ademan[m] [~ademanmat@2001:470:69fc:105::1:16db] has joined ##miniscript 21:09 -!- robertspigler [~robertspi@2001:470:69fc:105::2d53] has joined ##miniscript 21:09 -!- ksedgwic [~ksedgwicm@2001:470:69fc:105::ce1] has joined ##miniscript 23:53 -!- ademan[m] [~ademanmat@2001:470:69fc:105::1:16db] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 23:53 -!- ademan[m] [~ademanmat@2001:470:69fc:105::1:16db] has joined ##miniscript --- Log closed Sat Jan 08 00:00:24 2022