--- Log opened Tue Sep 27 00:00:31 2022
02:25 -!- jonatack2 [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
02:51 -!- jonatack2 [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has joined ##miniscript
02:56 -!- jonatack2 [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
03:13 -!- jonatack2 [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has joined ##miniscript
04:22 < darosior> sipa, andytoshi, sanket1729, achow101, others here: have you seen this "wallet policy" post from Salvatore Ingala? https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-May/020423.html. It's about the challenges of implementing output descriptors (with Miniscript) on a hardware signing device and trying to come up with a standard as close as
04:22 < darosior> possible to BIP380. If you have a minute he would very much welcome feedback on this.
05:40 -!- jonatack3 [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has joined ##miniscript
05:42 -!- jonatack2 [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
06:37 -!- jonatack3 [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
07:44 -!- jonatack3 [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has joined ##miniscript
07:56 -!- MatrixBot123 [~matrixbot@2001:bc8:1824:bc3::1] has joined ##miniscript
08:00 -!- andytoshi [~apoelstra@user/andytoshi] has quit [Quit: leaving]
08:00 -!- andytoshi [~apoelstra@user/andytoshi] has joined ##miniscript
08:00 -!- MatrixBot123 [~matrixbot@2001:bc8:1824:bc3::1] has quit [Client Quit]
08:00 -!- MatrixBot123 [~matrixbot@2001:bc8:1824:bc3::1] has joined ##miniscript
08:48 -!- stevenroose [~steven@2001:19f0:6801:83a:a49e:b3dd:ec60:6788] has joined ##miniscript
08:49 < stevenroose> Would it be fair to say that the `MiniscriptKey::Hash` type would maybe have been better named `Id` or something? Given that it's quite common to implement that as just the key itself
08:49 < stevenroose> like String does
10:28 -!- MatrixBot123 [~matrixbot@2001:bc8:1824:bc3::1] has quit [Quit: Bridge terminating on SIGTERM]
10:35 -!- MatrixBot123 [~matrixbot@2001:bc8:1824:bc3::2] has joined ##miniscript
10:42 < andytoshi> no, it represents an actual hash in the script
10:42 < andytoshi> it's only common to implement it as the key itself as a hack
10:42 < andytoshi> and as we push pkh support to be more second-class maybe that'll go away
10:56 < stevenroose> andytoshi: currently it represents the hash but only to represent the key in a semantic policy
10:57 < stevenroose> but as I understood it, that was just to have a unified common denominator way to represent keys
10:58 < stevenroose> like, many keys are not actually represented by key hash, but by raw pubkey (tapkeyspend, raw multisig) (to the point that if you had another pubkey with the same hash, it wouldn't actually semantically identical)
10:59 < andytoshi> right, that's changed in https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript/pull/461
10:59 < andytoshi> we use the pubkey for this now
10:59 < andytoshi> well, once that merges
11:00 < stevenroose> ah nice
11:00 < stevenroose> I like that better
11:00 < stevenroose> so we don't need the hack
11:00 < stevenroose> :)
11:00 < stevenroose> awesome work :)
16:15 < andytoshi> thanks :)
16:15 < andytoshi> though it was sanket1729 
19:23 -!- andytoshi [~apoelstra@user/andytoshi] has quit [Quit: leaving]
19:23 -!- andytoshi [~apoelstra@user/andytoshi] has joined ##miniscript
--- Log closed Wed Sep 28 00:00:32 2022