From: "'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List" <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
To: Weikeng Chen <weikeng.chen@l2iterative•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Development Mailing List <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] Time to add CSFS to Signet?
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:40:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <-rjcTH9purJtX6ug3rqaNVdouiTPS1hKYrLVzXmcGTsXIgt4AvtTjFpFFlpfP47n529efE5Ltl5CZ5yScbc08P02c52pfdw9nTwwLQbE_cA=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f34bdb6-8088-4501-8116-99e2f182b929n@googlegroups.com>
Hi Weikeng,
I'm obviously not opposed to the idea, just not sure what makes one signet more significant than an other?
The important thing is, there is a signet up and running for protocol devs to test things out on and for people to use as playground.
Now activating LNhance on a testnet would be more fun.
BR,
moonsettler
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Tuesday, March 18th, 2025 at 7:55 AM, Weikeng Chen <weikeng.chen@l2iterative•com> wrote:
> Moonsettler,
> I can see that LNHANCE has already had a live "mutinynet" working as a functional network for testing.
> Do you think it is still necessary to add it to the "signet" signet or just wait until more progress with CTV + CSFS on the bitcoin/bitcoin repository as PRs and then to testnet?
>
> Thanks,
> Weikeng
> On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 7:12:09 AM UTC+8 moonsettler wrote:
>
> > Hi Weikeng,
> >
> > CSFS is on signet. All the LNhance opcodes are on mutinynet.
> > https://github.com/lnhance/mutinynet-bitcoin/tree/mutinynet-cat-ln-hance
> > https://faucet.mutinynet.com/
> >
> > [signet]
> > signetchallenge=512102f7561d208dd9ae99bf497273e16f389bdbd6c4742ddb8e6b216e64fa2928ad8f51ae
> > addnode=45.79.52.207:38333
> > dnsseed=0
> > signetblocktime=30
> >
> > BR,
> > moonsettler
> >
> >
> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> >
> > On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 4:38 AM, Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative•com> wrote:
> >
> > > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, CSFS isn't.
> > > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Weikeng
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups•com.
> > > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/5f34bdb6-8088-4501-8116-99e2f182b929n%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/-rjcTH9purJtX6ug3rqaNVdouiTPS1hKYrLVzXmcGTsXIgt4AvtTjFpFFlpfP47n529efE5Ltl5CZ5yScbc08P02c52pfdw9nTwwLQbE_cA%3D%40protonmail.com.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 3:38 Weikeng Chen
2025-03-17 14:11 ` 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025-03-17 14:43 ` /dev /fd0
2025-03-17 22:52 ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025-03-18 6:55 ` Weikeng Chen
2025-03-18 16:40 ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='-rjcTH9purJtX6ug3rqaNVdouiTPS1hKYrLVzXmcGTsXIgt4AvtTjFpFFlpfP47n529efE5Ltl5CZ5yScbc08P02c52pfdw9nTwwLQbE_cA=@protonmail.com' \
--to=bitcoindev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=moonsettler@protonmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=weikeng.chen@l2iterative$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox