Hi Dave,

Below are the differences between proposed BIP and earlier proposals:

> 
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/014193.html

- It uses OP_RETURN
- It requires some percentage of tagged input addresses to reach a certain 
level

> 
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014321.html

- It requires soft fork and a new opcode OP_CHECKBLOCKVERSION

> 
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-April/020344.html

- It requires soft fork

> 
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2013-June/002729.html

- It involves Proof-of-Stake voting based on UTXOs

/dev/fd0
floppy disk guy

On Monday, August 19, 2024 at 2:13:33 PM UTC David A. Harding wrote:

> On 2024-08-18 19:08, /dev /fd0 wrote:
> > - Users can broadcast their transactions with one of these numbers
> > used as `nLockTime` to show support
>
> Variations on this idea have been proposed many times before; here's a 
> few I quickly found:
>
> - 
>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/014193.html
>
> - 
>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014321.html
>
> - 
>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-April/020344.html
>
> - 
>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2013-June/002729.html
>
> I think it'd be useful if you could explain how your proposal 
> meaningfully differs from previous proposals.
>
> -Dave
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/003b5d22-a3c6-403c-b56d-0b2f3aca1e2an%40googlegroups.com.