From: <eric@voskuil•org>
To: "'Anthony Towns'" <aj@erisian•com.au>
Cc: 'Bitcoin Protocol Discussion' <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:05:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <009a01d8dcf4$6e913290$4bb397b0$@voskuil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0LMTtOYdNjzJ1MN@erisian.com.au>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian•com.au>
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay
> > > > > > Protocol cannot be defined on an ad-hoc basis as a "courtesy"
> > > > > BIPs are a courtesy in the first place.
> > > > I suppose if you felt that you were the authority then this would
> > > > be your perspective.
> > > You seem to think that I'm arguing courtesy is not a good thing, or
> > > that we couldn't use more of it?
> > That is neither what I said nor implied. You were clearly dismissing
> > the public process, not advocating for politeness.
>
> And that is neither what I said nor implied, nor something I believe. If
you
> think courtesy is something that can be ignored in a public process, I
don't
> think you should expect much success.
"BIPs are a courtesy in the first place."
> If you'd like to actually participate in public standards development,
please
> feel free to make some technical comments on my proposals, or others, or
> make your own proposal, either here or on github, or heck, anywhere else.
"RE: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay"
> I mean, that's what I'd suggest anyway; I'm not your boss. I promise to at
> least be entertainingly surprised if you make any progress with your
current
> approach though.
Grow up Anthony.
e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-10 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-05 20:43 Eric Voskuil
2022-10-06 4:32 ` eric
2022-10-07 6:31 ` Anthony Towns
2022-10-08 19:58 ` eric
2022-10-09 5:52 ` Anthony Towns
2022-10-09 7:00 ` eric
2022-10-09 13:27 ` Anthony Towns
2022-10-10 22:05 ` eric [this message]
[not found] <A485FF21-3B14-49B4-BC53-99AFAA90E38D@voskuil.org>
2022-09-27 19:21 ` Eric Voskuil
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-08 22:43 eric
2022-09-26 17:50 ` alicexbt
2022-09-26 21:19 ` eric
2022-09-27 9:29 ` alicexbt
2022-10-04 15:15 ` Suhas Daftuar
2022-10-05 0:01 ` eric
2022-10-05 6:55 ` Anthony Towns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='009a01d8dcf4$6e913290$4bb397b0$@voskuil.org' \
--to=eric@voskuil$(echo .)org \
--cc=aj@erisian$(echo .)com.au \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox