Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees

From: Eric Lombrozo <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:20:37 -0700

I definitely think we need some voting system for metaconsensus…but if we’re going to seriously consider this we should look at the problem much more generally. Using false choices doesn’t really help, though ;)

- Eric Lombrozo

> On Jun 13, 2015, at 10:13 PM, Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Eric Lombrozo <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
> 2) BIP100 has direct economic consequences…and particularly for miners. It lends itself to much greater corruptibility.
> 
> 
> What is the alternative?  Have a Chief Scientist or Technical Advisory Board choose what is a proper fee, what is a proper level of decentralization, a proper growth factor?