* [bitcoin-dev] BIP number request for wallet policies @ 2023-12-16 14:10 Antoine Poinsot 2024-01-25 16:49 ` Michael Folkson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Antoine Poinsot @ 2023-12-16 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitcoin-dev Wallet policies, a standard for implementing support for output descriptors in hardware signing devices was introduced by Salvatore Ingala a year and a half ago [0]. A pull request to the BIP repository was opened more than a year ago [1]. It's been waiting for a BIP number to be assigned since then. There is now 3 majors hardware signing devices using this standard in production (Ledger, BitBox02, Jade). There has been multiple pings on the PR in the past year to get assigned a BIP number. It would be nice to hear from the BIP editors about their expectations from the author, so we can move forward with this document specifying what's already become an industry standard. Antoine Poinsot [0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-May/020492.html [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1389 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP number request for wallet policies 2023-12-16 14:10 [bitcoin-dev] BIP number request for wallet policies Antoine Poinsot @ 2024-01-25 16:49 ` Michael Folkson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Michael Folkson @ 2024-01-25 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Antoine Poinsot; +Cc: bitcoin-dev Just to inform this list, this pull request has since been assigned a BIP number (BIP 388) [0]. Thanks Michael [0]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1389 -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at protonmail.com GPG: A2CF5D71603C92010659818D2A75D601B23FEE0F Learn about Bitcoin: https://www.youtube.com/@portofbitcoin On Saturday, 16 December 2023 at 14:10, Antoine Poinsot via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Wallet policies, a standard for implementing support for output descriptors in hardware signing devices was introduced by Salvatore Ingala a year and a half ago [0]. > > A pull request to the BIP repository was opened more than a year ago [1]. It's been waiting for a BIP number to be assigned since then. > > There is now 3 majors hardware signing devices using this standard in production (Ledger, BitBox02, Jade). There has been multiple pings on the PR in the past year to get assigned a BIP number. > > It would be nice to hear from the BIP editors about their expectations from the author, so we can move forward with this document specifying what's already become an industry standard. > > Antoine Poinsot > > [0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-May/020492.html > [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1389 > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-25 16:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-12-16 14:10 [bitcoin-dev] BIP number request for wallet policies Antoine Poinsot 2024-01-25 16:49 ` Michael Folkson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox