Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Contradiction in BIP65 text?

From: xor <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:08:55 +0100

On Friday, November 13, 2015 09:53:57 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The first text is explaining nlocktime without BIP65 in order to
> explain the reason for having BIP65.

Thanks. I would recommend changing the BIP65 to clarify what you just said, 
this clearly is the missing piece of information there.