* [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet
@ 2023-03-02 6:55 kcalvinalvin
2023-03-02 18:20 ` Luke Dashjr
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kcalvinalvin @ 2023-03-02 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 650 bytes --]
Hello all,
Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1 << 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and signet as requested by the comment in protocol.h in bitcoind (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src/protocol.h#L295-L301). There are plans to release binaries for the utreexo node (github.com/utreexo/utreexod) in the next few months so that power users can try it out. I have no plans to release binaries for mainnet yet.
Do let me know if someone else is using the same bit to signal for something else and we can coordinate accordingly.
Best,
Calvin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1004 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet
2023-03-02 6:55 [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet kcalvinalvin
@ 2023-03-02 18:20 ` Luke Dashjr
2023-03-02 21:05 ` Peter Todd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luke Dashjr @ 2023-03-02 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kcalvinalvin, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
This sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a
normal service bit assignment...?
Luke
On 3/2/23 01:55, kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1
> << 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and
> signet as requested by the comment in protocol.h in
> bitcoind (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src/protocol.h#L295-L301).
> There are plans to release binaries for the utreexo node
> (github.com/utreexo/utreexod) in the next few months so that power
> users can try it out. I have no plans to release binaries for mainnet
> yet.
>
> Do let me know if someone else is using the same bit to signal for
> something else and we can coordinate accordingly.
>
> Best,
> Calvin
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet
2023-03-02 18:20 ` Luke Dashjr
@ 2023-03-02 21:05 ` Peter Todd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Todd @ 2023-03-02 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luke Dashjr, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion,
Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev, kcalvinalvin
On March 2, 2023 6:20:35 PM GMT, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>This sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a normal service bit assignment...?
The purpose of the experimental service bits is experiments. If the details of utreexo aren't nailed down and may change, an experimental service bit makes sense.
Bit 24 is fine and AFAIK unused at the moment; full-rbf is using bit 26: https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/commit/c15b8d70778238abfa751e4216a97140be6369af#diff-8e2ffc8fe0e0847a6aac311a93b2faeebd2d76ddb2c81741bb8cf7448287807eR297
>Luke
>
>
>On 3/2/23 01:55, kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1 << 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and signet as requested by the comment in protocol.h in bitcoind (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src/protocol.h#L295-L301). There are plans to release binaries for the utreexo node (github.com/utreexo/utreexod) in the next few months so that power users can try it out. I have no plans to release binaries for mainnet yet.
>>
>> Do let me know if someone else is using the same bit to signal for something else and we can coordinate accordingly.
>>
>> Best,
>> Calvin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-02 21:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-02 6:55 [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet kcalvinalvin
2023-03-02 18:20 ` Luke Dashjr
2023-03-02 21:05 ` Peter Todd
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox