From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof•com>
To: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:56:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12ED3204-6F51-4CEC-960C-5771597ACB4D@bitsofproof.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30930479.sqHpaOe3cY@crushinator>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 887 bytes --]
I am not a lawyer, just thinking loud.
I think that technology is a strong argument before court, but I suspect that it is just that, as of now.
Tamas Blummer
On Jan 20, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015, at 6:44 pm, Tamas Blummer wrote:
>> Knowing the private key and owning the linked coins is not necessarily the same in front of a court.
>>
>> At least in german law there is a difference between ‘Eigentum' means ownership and ‘Besitz’ means ability to deal with it.
>> Being able to deal with an asset does not make you the owner.
>
> So what we're telling the newbies in /r/bitcoin is plain wrong. Bitcoins *do* have an owner independent from the parties who have access to the private keys that control their disposition. That's pretty difficult to reconcile from a technological perspective.
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1680 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 496 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 15:46 Peter Todd
[not found] ` <CAHpxFbEoDLMGKB7arHbgB+4kx8BwgcX7nBUZz6yP9k4LjZeu1A@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-20 17:15 ` Peter Todd
2015-01-20 17:23 ` Matt Whitlock
2015-01-20 17:40 ` Peter Todd
2015-01-20 17:44 ` Matt Whitlock
2015-01-20 17:44 ` Tamas Blummer
2015-01-20 17:47 ` Matt Whitlock
2015-01-20 17:49 ` Peter Todd
2015-01-20 17:56 ` Tamas Blummer [this message]
2015-01-20 17:47 ` Justus Ranvier
2015-01-20 18:48 ` Tamas Blummer
2015-01-20 19:31 ` Justus Ranvier
2015-01-20 21:33 ` odinn
2015-01-20 21:49 ` Roy Badami
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12ED3204-6F51-4CEC-960C-5771597ACB4D@bitsofproof.com \
--to=tamas@bitsofproof$(echo .)com \
--cc=bip@mattwhitlock$(echo .)name \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox