Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed new P2P command and response: getcmds, cmdlist

From: Amir Taaki <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:34:53 -0700 (PDT)

Introspection/command discovery is nice, but I would prefer it to be immediately done in the first version exchange so no assumptions as to how a network is operating need to be made.

I like the idea of a flat list of commands. It might make sense to have "meta"-commands that alias to groups of commands. i.e "original" for the current core subset up to (and including) "pong". The aliases could exist in a text definition file which is held on github or bitcoin.org/

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]>
To: Bitcoin Development <[email-masked]>
Cc: 
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 2:13 AM
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed new P2P command and response: getcmds, cmdlist

Outside of major features advertised network-wide in nService bits,
P2P protocol lacks a good method of enumerating minor features or
extensions.  The version number increment is coarse-grained, and is
not self-documenting.  A simple extension which lists supported
commands is added, as demonstrated in this pull request:

    https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1471

Another option is for verack to return this information at login,
eliminating the need for a separate command/response.

-- 
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
[email-masked]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
[email-masked]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development